Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in the emergency department

We describe 3 patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) with stroke, deep venous thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism and renal failure after undergoing cardiac surgery 7 to 17 days earlier. Their onset of thrombosis after previous heparin exposure was temporally plausible for complications of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, an immune-mediated thrombotic disorder triggered by heparin. The patients had normal platelet counts at presentation, yet each had circulating heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibodies that were ultimately confirmed. Two patients had heparin reexposure in the ED, 1 of whom developed thrombocytopenia with new thrombosis and died. Alternative parenteral anticoagulation prevented further thrombosis in 2 patients. Because heparin use can be catastrophic in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, physicians should be vigilant in suspecting heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients with thrombosis after recent hospitalization or heparin exposure. Alternative anticoagulants are available for these at-risk patients.     

Thrombosis in suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia occurs more often with high antibody levels

ObjectiveThe study objective was to determine whether higher antiplatelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibody levels using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay are associated with more frequent thrombotic events in patients with clinically suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is an immune-mediated adverse drug reaction. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay detects anti-PF4/heparin antibodies to support a suspected clinical diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. The utility of quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay results is uncertain.MethodsOur single-centered study evaluated quantitative anti-PF4/heparin antibody levels using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in consecutive hospitalized patients with a clinical suspicion of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and positive anti-PF4/heparin antibody levels between July 2003 and December 2006.ResultsOverall, anti-PF4/heparin antibody values were available for 318 patients with clinically suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. The median level was 0.85 optical density units (range 0.31-4.0). The overall rate of arterial or venous thrombosis was 23.3%. A 1-unit increase in anti-PF4/heparin antibody level was associated with an approximate doubling in the odds of thrombosis by 30 days (odds ratio, 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-2.6; P = .0001). The proportion of patients with pulmonary embolism increased with higher anti-PF4/heparin antibody levels.ConclusionHigher levels of anti-PF4/heparin antibody are associated with increased thrombosis risk among patients with clinically suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and might have clinical utility for prediction of true heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and the development of thrombosis.     

Intraoperative anticoagulation management during cardiac transplantation for a patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and a left ventricular assist device

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is an immunologically mediated syndrome that is associated with potentially life-threatening arterial and venous thrombosis. Re-exposing patients who have heparin-induced thrombocytopenia to heparin during cardiopulmonary bypass may be hazardous. We describe the re-exposure to unfractionated heparin of a patient with a left ventricular assist device and evidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia who needed cardiac transplantation, which was accomplished without complications.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis: Incidence,analysis of risk factors,and clinical outcomes in 108 consecutive patients treated at a single institution

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis (HITT) can lead to serious morbidity and may be potentially fatal. We reviewed our experience with this entity over a 4-year period, to determine the following: 1) incidence and type of thrombosis in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), 2) clinical consequences of thrombosis, i.e., amputation, cerebrovascular accidents and death, 3) risk factors associated with development of thrombosis, and 4) impact of therapy on clinical outcomes in patients with HITT. Between 1991–1994, 108 patients were diagnosed to have HIT by heparin-induced platelet aggregation test. Thirty-two (29%) of these developed thrombotic complications, of which 20 were venous, 8 arterial, and 4 both. Five of the 32 died, 3 underwent amputations, and 3 had cerebrovascular accidents. The patients who developed thrombotic complications, when compared to those with HIT alone, were older (68.7 ± 11.5 vs. 63.3 ± 16 years, P = .05), had more severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count 46,300 ± 30,400/mm³ vs. 62,500 ± 34,400/mm³, P = .02), and developed it earlier (6.0 ± 2.9 vs. 7.4 ± 3.1 days, P = .03). Multivariate analysis showed that severity of thrombocytopenia and early fall in platelet count were independent risk factors for development of thrombotic complications. We did not find an association between development of thrombosis and clinical events (myocardial infarction, cardiac procedures or surgery, noncardiac surgery, and sepsis) that occurred immediately prior to onset of thrombocytopenia. Heparin was stopped in all 32 patients with HITT. Six received no additional therapy, and one received a single dose of aspirin. Three of these 7 died. The other 25 received anticoagulant or multiagent therapy, with 2 deaths. The death rate was lower in those who were treated with anticoagulant or multiagent therapy (P = .05). We conclude that: 1) Thrombotic complications occur in about 29% of hospitalized patients who develop HIT. 2) Early, severe fall in platelet count in elderly patients receiving heparin appears to be associated with development of thrombotic complications. 3) Our data do not show an association between development of thrombotic complications and clinical events immediately preceding the diagnosis of HIT. 4) In addition to discontinuation of heparin, anticoagulant or thrombolytic therapy should be considered in patients with HITT. Am. J. Hematol. 56:12–16, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a prothrombotic drug reaction caused by platelet-activating antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 and heparin. OBJECTIVE: To describe a syndrome termed delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, in which thrombocytopenia and thrombotic events begin 5 or more days after withdrawal of heparin. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Secondary and tertiary care hospitals. PATIENTS: 12 patients who presented with serologically confirmed, delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, including 6 outpatients presenting after hospital discharge. MEASUREMENTS: The platelet serotonin-release assay was used to measure IgG-induced heparin-dependent and heparin-independent platelet activation; an enzyme immunoassay that detects IgG against platelet factor 4-heparin complexes was also used. RESULTS: Patients with delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia presented with thrombocytopenia and associated thrombosis a mean of 9.2 days (range, 5 to 19 days) after stopping heparin therapy. Nine patients received additional heparin, with further decrease in platelet counts. Compared with controls, patients with delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia had higher titers of IgG antibodies to platelet factor 4-heparin and greater IgG-induced heparin-dependent and heparin-independent platelet activation. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia should be suspected when patients present with thrombocytopenia and thrombosis up to 3 weeks after exposure to heparin. This syndrome could be caused by high titers of platelet-activating IgG induced by heparin.     

Argatroban: update

Unfractionated heparin has historically been used as the anticoagulant of choice in the management of a number of thrombotic diseases. Recognition of the limitations of heparin has led to the development of a newer class of anticoagulants, the direct thrombin inhibitors. Argatroban is a synthetic small molecule that selectively inhibits thrombin at its active site. In preclinical studies, argatroban has been shown to be more effective than heparin in preventing arterial thrombosis and in promoting vessel patency in conjunction with thrombolysis in a number of animal models. In clinical trials, argatroban has been shown to be as effective as heparin in the management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in conjunction with thrombolysis. It has been shown to be an effective anticoagulant in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. In patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia complicated by thrombosis, argatroban significantly decreases the risk of thrombotic events. Small studies have demonstrated a potential role for its use in ischemic stroke and hemodialysis. Additional studies are warranted to confirm argatroban's efficacy in a wide variety of clinical settings.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with or without thrombosis has been recognized increasingly as a serious complication of heparin use. This article reviews type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, which is mediated by an antibody that in most cases has specificity for a complex between heparin and platelet factor 4, a secreted platelet alpha-granule protein. The antibody-heparin-platelet factor 4 complex can activate platelets and endothelial cells, thereby initiating thrombosis. Clinical thrombosis in this syndrome may be arterial or venous. Treatment of the syndrome requires discontinuation of heparin and institution of an alternative anticoagulant.     

Thrombocytopenia induced by heparin. Diagnosis, treatment, physiopathology: current concepts

Iatrogenic thrombocytopenia is a rare, but severe complication of treatments with heparin and heparinoids. Mean temporary thrombocytopenia failing to show any complications are usually diagnosed as quite different from acute and delayed thrombocytopenia of which severity depends mainly on thrombotic symptoms demonstrated in 65 p. 100 of cases; the initial evolution of an average thrombocytopenia is not easy to diagnose; it may as well exist a connection between the two diseases, from a physiopathogenic point of view. The diagnosis of severe thrombocytopenia depends:--clinically, on the initial data, delayed as compared with the heparin treatment beginning and existence of arterial and/or venous thrombosis;--biologically, by demonstrating an aggregating activity for platelets in presence of heparin, in the patient plasma. Such an activity requires the suppression of standard heparinotherapy as well as the choice of substitutive anticoagulant treatment in case of evolutive thrombosis. Low molecular weight heparins are prescribed only if in vitro tests of platelet aggregation with the patient's plasma are negative. Antivitamins K are to be used as soon as possible alone or combined with heparin fractions. Antiaggregants are prescribed alone, above all in case of isolated thrombocytopenia and combined with AVK. Treatment of thrombotic complications depends on surgical disobstruction if arterial thrombosis, and use of fibrinolytics if pulmonary embolisms. The acute reaction of some thrombocytopenia to heparin as well as therapeutic difficulties demonstrate the efficiency of an early diagnosis performed thanks to systematic platelet numerations during the first 15 days of a treatment with heparin, as well as to the prevention along with systematic association with aspirin, especially if replaced with AVK.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: association with a platelet aggregating factor and arterial thromboses.

Eleven patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia were studied. Thrombocytopenia appeared 3-16 days following the initiation of prophylactic or therapeutic doses of heparin. The mean lowest platelet count recorded was 48,000/mm3. When heparin was stopped, recovery from thrombocytopenia began within 24 hours and was complete by ten days. Two patients developed fatal thromboses, and two others had myocardial infarctions while thrombo-cytopenic. In the serum of seven patients, including three of the four with arterial thrombosis, a heparin-dependent platelet aggregating factor was present. The factor caused release of platelet 14C serotonin but did not lyse platelets. It was present in the globulin fraction of all positive sera, and in one serum studied it was isolated in the IgG/IgA immunoglobulin fraction. The factor was not present in 16 normal sera or in the sera of 15 nonthrombocytopenic patients receiving heparin. Our observations suggest that heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is common and that, in some patients it may be accompanied by severe arterial thrombosis. In vivo platelet aggregation is a possible explanation for the thrombocytopenia and the thrombosis in this disorder.     

The endocarditis that was not: an unusual case of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with unusual complications.

The complications of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia have been well described previously. However, evidence of the possibility that heparin-induced thrombocytopenia can trigger a thyroid storm has never been published before. A catastrophic evolution of a man referred with a high endocarditis suspicion previously treated with heparin, who successively developed arterial thrombosis and thyroid storm, is described.     

Failure of early heparin cessation as treatment for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

PURPOSE: The complications of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia include thrombosis and death. The purpose of the study was to determine whether early heparin cessation can prevent these outcomes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia diagnosed by platelet aggregometry. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory findings were compared in patients by whether heparin treatment was stopped early (< or = 48 hours) or late (>48 hours) after the onset of thrombocytopenia, as well as between patients with and without thrombosis. Thrombocytopenia was defined as a 50% decline in baseline platelet counts or an absolute platelet count < 100,000/mm3. RESULTS: Of the 113 patients, 38% developed thrombosis and 27% died. One-half of patients had thrombosis diagnosed >24 hours after heparin cessation. No difference in thrombosis or mortality was found in the 40 patients with early heparin cessation [mean (+/-SD) time of cessation 0.7 +/- 0.6 days] compared with the 73 patients with late heparin cessation (5 +/- 3 days). Thrombosis >24 hours after heparin cessation occurred in 61% of the patients in the early group and in 40% of the late group (P = 0.17). In a multivariate analysis, only a lower nadir of the platelet count (percent of baseline) was associated with thrombosis. Neither thrombosis nor the time to heparin cessation were associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Early heparin cessation was not effective in reducing morbid events in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Treatment strategies other than heparin cessation alone should be considered in patients with this condition.     

Treatment of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT)

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a novel prothrombotic disorder characterized by thrombosis, thrombocytopenia, and disseminated intravascular coagulation identified in hundreds of recipients of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford/AstraZeneca), an adenovirus vector coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine. VITT resembles heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in that patients have platelet-activating anti-platelet factor 4 antibodies; however, whereas heparin typically enhances platelet activation by HIT antibodies, VITT antibody-induced platelet activation is often inhibited in vitro by pharmacological concentrations of heparin. Further, the thrombotic complications in VITT feature much higher frequencies of atypical thrombosis, most notably cerebral vein thrombosis and splanchnic vein thrombosis, compared with HIT. In this review, we outline the treatments that have been used to manage this novel condition since its recognition in March 2021, including anticoagulation, high-dose intravenous immune globulin, therapeutic plasma exchange, corticosteroids, rituximab, and eculizumab. We discuss the controversial issue of whether heparin, which often inhibits VITT antibody-induced platelet activation, is harmful in the treatment of VITT. We also describe a case of “long VITT,” describing the treatment challenges resulting from platelet-activating anti-PF4 antibodies that persisted for more than 9 months.     

Ischemic vascular complications following thrombopenia induced by heparin. Diagnostic and therapeutic problems

The authors report 21 cases of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with ischemic vascular complications. The clinical presentations were peripheral arterial ischemia (16 cases), hemiplegia (1 case) and deep vein thrombosis (4 cases). The vascular surgeon confronted by these complications in an emergency situation should recognise the difficulties of clinical diagnosis (atypical forms) and biological investigations (problems of tests of platelet aggregation). Arterial occlusions are usually accessible to disobliteration with a Fogarty catheter without peroperative heparinisation. Delayed diagnosis explains the seriousness of these complications; in our series of 21 patients, there were 2 deaths, 1 paraplegia, 4 amputations due to arterial problems, 4 severe post-deep vein thrombosis conditions, two of which followed trans-metatarsal amputation. The diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia implies immediate withdrawal of heparin therapy. A relay with a low molecular weight heparin is not without risk and should only be undertaken after a negative platelet aggregation test (with the low molecular weight heparin). These tests are rarely practicable in emergency situations and a relay using oral anti-vitamin K antagonists with a rapid onset of action is probably the safest option.     

Efficacy and safety of danaparoid sodium (ORG 10172) in critically ill patients with heparin-associated thrombocytopenia.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and the safety of danaparoid sodium in the treatment of critically ill patients with standard unfractionated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) or low-molecular-weight HIT. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 42 consecutive critically ill patients who were admitted for HIT between October 1992 and February 1997 and were treated either with therapeutic or prophylactic doses of danaparoid sodium. RESULTS: Among the 26 patients treated with therapeutic doses, neither new thrombotic complications nor thrombosis extension was clinically suspected. Two deaths were directly related to lower limb acute arterial thrombosis associated with HIT. Two major hemorrhagic complications were observed when aspirin in addition to danaparoid sodium was administered. When danaparoid sodium was used in prophylactic doses (20 courses of treatment) to prevent either postsurgical or medical thrombotic complications, no thrombotic event was observed. No death related to HIT or danaparoid sodium treatment was observed. One aggravation of a postsurgical cerebral lesion was observed. During danaparoid sodium treatment, a persistence or a recurrence of thrombocytopenia was observed in 6.5% of patients without thrombotic complications. CONCLUSION: Danaparoid sodium appears to be an efficient and safe treatment in critically ill patients with HIT. The concomitant use of aspirin in addition to danaparoid sodium seems to represent an important additional hemorrhagic risk that should be avoided in patient management.     

A case of pulmonary thromboembolism with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia]

In February 2000, a 70-year-old man was admitted to our hospital complaining of back pain and dyspnea on exertion. Pulmonary thromboembolism was diagnosed, and he was treated with intravenous urokinase and heparin. The pulmonary thromboembolism improved, though heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) was subsequently observed. The thrombocytopenia was then improved by withdrawing the intravenous heparin, but thrombosis appeared extending from both femoral veins to the inferior vena cava. The thrombosis was dispersed by catheter-directed thrombolysis. There have been few reports of HIT in Japan. Heparin is frequently used for the treatment of pulmonary thromboembolism, but special care must be taken, since severe thrombotic complications are associated with HIT.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is the most frequent and the most important idiosyncratic haematological drug reaction. It is important for several reasons: first, because heparin is used so often, and the frequency of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is high, the risk of a hospitalized patient developing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is high. Second, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia poses a major therapeutic dilemma for the clinician - continue the heparin and risk a worsening of the thrombocytopenia, or stop the heparin and risk extension or embolism of the thrombus. Finally, a small subset of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia develop the disastrous complication of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia plus arterial thrombosis. Some of these patients die. In this review, we will summarize some of the issues concerning heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, including its frequency, the various techniques used to diagnose the condition, its pathophysiology and approaches that can be used to manage patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.     

Delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a syndrome in which thrombocytopenia and thrombosis begin several days after heparin discontinuation. Delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is caused by immunoglobulin G antibodies that are reactive against the heparin-platelet factor 4 complex in the absence of circulating heparin. We describe 2 patients with delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia who presented to the emergency department. An 88-year-old man and a 62-year-old man experienced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis 9 or more days after heparin cessation and demonstrated a further decrease in platelet count on reexposure to heparin. Delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia should be included in the differential diagnosis of a patient with recent heparin exposure who presents with thrombosis or thrombocytopenia.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia as the cause of gluteus muscle necrosis: a case study describing the benefits of multidisciplinary physical and psychosocial interventions

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, an increasingly recognized aspect of heparin therapy, occurs in 0.6% to 30% of patients receiving heparin. Approximately 1% of those patients develop the more severe heparin-induced thrombocytopenia II, also called white clot syndrome, in which synchronous venous and arterial thrombi impede blood flow in central vessels. Mortality (as high as 25%) and morbidity are related to the site and extent of thrombi formation. Following vascular surgery, one patient manifested an unusual consequence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia II when thrombotic blockage of the vessels supplying the bilateral gluteus maximus and minimus muscles resulted in tissue ischemia and death. Supporting the patient through numerous complications and managing the extensive wound healing process required multidisciplinary skills and innovative technology, including use of vacuum-assisted closure therapy, platelet-derived growth factors, parenteral and enteral nutritional support, and spirit-restoring favorite foods. This article describes the patient's life-threatening and long-lasting effects from an allergic reaction to heparin therapy. In addition to information about the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, this article also describes management of the wound and other aspects of care and comforting that occurred over a 9-month hospitalization.     

Rapid anticoagulation using ancrod for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

In order to determine the efficacy and safety of ancrod, a rapid acting defibrinogenating drug, for patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, 11 consecutive patients who required anticoagulant therapy because of venous thromboembolism and who developed acute heparin-induced thrombocytopenia or had a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia were treated with ancrod. Heparin therapy was discontinued (in patients receiving heparin) and ancrod started at a dose of 1 to 2 U/kg every 24 hours with subsequent daily doses adjusted to maintain fibrinogen levels between 0.5 and 1.0 g/L. Ancrod was continued until warfarin had become effective. The platelet count increased to more than 150 x 10(9)/L within 2 to 10 days in all thrombocytopenic patients. Two patients with a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia maintained normal platelet counts while receiving ancrod. Two patients had recurrent venous thrombosis while receiving warfarin, 10 days after ancrod was discontinued: one of these patients had metastatic pancreatic carcinoma and developed phlegmasia cerulea dolens and the other patient developed a venographically proven extension of her deep venous thrombosis. One patient suffered a bleeding episode into the thigh with a 16-g/L decrease in her hemoglobin level while receiving ancrod therapy. No other side effects were noted. Our experience indicates that ancrod therapy is a reasonable approach for patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia who require anticoagulant therapy.     

Argatroban: a direct thrombin inhibitor for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and other clinical applications

Argatroban, a direct thrombin inhibitor derived from arginine, is an effective anticoagulant indicated for prophylaxis or treatment of thrombosis in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Argatroban has been used as an alternative anticoagulant in patients with HIT in various clinical conditions including interventional cardiovascular procedures that require anticoagulation. Satisfactory clinical outcomes with acceptable complications have been reported in these patients. Whether argatroban offers additional clinical advantage over conventional heparin therapy in patients without HIT remains unclear. Argatroban has been evaluated as an alternative anticoagulant to replace heparin in various clinical studies, especially in patients with coronary artery disease or cerebral vascular disease. To date, it remains unclear if argatroban is more effective than heparin, although the agent seems to cause less bleeding complications. This article reviews the pharmacology of argatroban and its clinical application beyond the management of HIT, with particular emphasis on interventional cardiology procedure, acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris, cerebral thrombosis or ischemic stroke, peripheral obstructive arterial disease, and extracorporeal circulation.