Study of Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Triggering by Electronic Article Surveillance Devices (SPICED TEAS)

The magnetic fields emitted by electronic article surveillance (EAS) systems (shoplifting gates) are a source of interference for implanted medical devices. In the Study of Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Triggering by Electronic Article Surveillance Devices (SPICED TEAS), 25 adult volunteers with ICDs and 50 with pacemakers were exposed to the fields of six different EAS systems. These EAS systems used three modes of operation: magnetic audio frequency, swept radio frequency, and acoustomagnetic technology. No ICD exhibited interference mimicking sensing of tachyarrhythmias with any EAS system. Pacemakers interacted variably, depending on the type of EAS system. Swept radiofrequency systems produced no interaction with any implanted medical device. One magnetic audio frequency system interacted with 2 of 50 pacemakers. The acoustomagnetic system interacted with 48 of 50 pacemakers. Interactions included asynchronous pacing, atrial oversensing (producing "EAS induced tachycardia" in the ventricle), ventricular oversensing (with pacemaker inhibition), and paced beats resulting from the direct induction of current in the pacemaker ("EAS induced pacing"). These interactions produced symptoms in some patients ( palpitations, presyncopel only while patients were in the EAS field. No pacemaker was reprogrammed. We conclude that high energy, pulsed low frequency EAS systems such as acoustomagnetic systems interfere with most pacemakers. Pacemaker patients should be advised to minimize exposure to the fields of such systems to prevent the possibility of serious clinical events.     

Long-term complication rates in ventricular, single lead VDD, and dual chamber pacing

A higher incidence of pacemaker related complications has been reported in DDD systems as compared to VVI devices. The implantation of single lead VDD pacemakers might reduce the complication rate of physiological pacing in patients with AV block. In a retrospective study, the data records of 1,214 consecutive patients with pacemaker implantation for AV block between 1990 and 2001 (VVI 36.5%, DDD 32.9%, VDD 30.6%) were analyzed. Complications requiring surgical interventions were compared during a follow-up period of 64 +/- 31 months. Operation and fluoroscopic times were longer in DDD pacemaker implantation compared to VDD and VVI devices:58 +/- 23 versus 39 +/- 10 and 37 +/- 13 minutes (P<0.001), 9.2 +/- 5.2 versus 4.1 +/- 2.4 and 3.5 +/- 2.3 minutes, respectively. Differences remained significant after correction for covariates. In a multivariate Cox regression model, the corrected complication hazard of a DDD pacemaker implantation was increased by 3.9 (1.4-11.3) compared to VVI and increased by 2.3 (1.1-4.5) compared to VDD pacing. Higher complication rates in DDD pacing were mainly due to a higher incidence of early reoperation for atrial lead dysfunction, whereas the long-term complication rate was not different from VDD or VVI pacing. Early and long-term complication rates did not differ between VDD and VVI pacemaker systems. In conclusion, operation time and complication rates of physiological pacing are reduced by VDD pacemaker implantation achieving values comparable to VVI pacing. Thus, single lead VDD pacing can be recommended for patients with AV block.     

Development of atrial fibrillation in patients with atrioventricular block after atrioventricular synchronized pacing

Many studies have evidenced an increased incidence of AF in patients receiving single chamber ventricular pacing (VVI) when compared with those undergoing an atrial-based system (AAI or DDD). However, the difference in incidence of AF between two atrial-based systems (VDD, DDD) in patients with AV block was still controversial. This study was conducted to compare the development of AF between different modes of pacemakers (VDD and DDD) in patients with symptomatic AV block. A retrospective review was conducted of the detailed records of all consecutive patients who received permanent pacemakers due to symptomatic bradycardia from March 1995 to March 2000. The occurrence of AF was documented when there was presence of AF in the free-run or 12-lead ECG, any ECG strips, or persistent AF on 24-hour Holter ECG during the follow-up. The study included 152 patients (44 women, 108 men; mean age 73). The patients were divided into two groups: VDD (n = 100) and DDD (n = 52). The mean follow-up was 48.9 +/- 22.9 months. The incidence of AF was 7.9%. A higher incidence of AF was noted in the DDD group (15.4%) when compared with the VDD group (4.0%, P = 0.023). The incidence of development of AF in patients with AV block was higher in those receiving DDD cardiac pacing when compared with those who received the VDD system. The authors suggest that VDD pacing may be a better choice than the DDD system for patients with AV block, but without clinical evidence of sinus node dysfunction, and if an atrial lead is required, it should be placed close to the Bachmann's bundle.     

The acute effect of cardiac pacing mode on endothelial vasodilation: prospective, double-blind, cross-over, comparative clinical study

Background: Compared to atrioventricular sequential pacing, ventricular demand pacing is known to have somewhat more deleterious hemodynamic effects, which probably arise from increased sympathetic tonus and inappropriate baroreceptor activation. Endothelial function is affected by various local and systemic factors including baroreceptor activity. The aim of this study was to explore whether cardiac pacing would have any effect on endothelial functions.
Methods: Twelve patients (six male, mean age: 75 ± 9 years) with previously implanted DDD or VDD cardiac pacemakers were included. All patients had stable atrial rhythms during the study. Patients were randomized to either atrial-based pacing mode (VDD or DDD) or ventricular demand pacing mode (VVI) first, and then cross-over was performed with the other pacing mode. Endothelial function was assessed by brachial artery ultrasonography. Basal diameter of the brachial artery, and both flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and endothelium-independent vasodilation with nitroglycerin were measured 1 hour after each pacing mode.
Results: Compared to atrial-based pacing mode, ventricular demand pacing was associated with a significantly worse FMD both as absolute and percentage values (0.17 ± 0.09 mm vs 0.28 ± 0.11 mm, P = 0.015 and 4.84 ± 2.37 % vs 7.00 ± 2.88 %, P = 0.028, respectively). However, there was no significant difference in nitroglycerin-mediated vasodilation values between the two pacing sessions.
Conclusions: Acute ventricular demand pacing (VVI pacing) is clearly associated with attenuation of FMD in patients with atrial-based pacing systems. The attenuation of endothelial vasodilation might have a role in hemodynamic and clinical deterioration in patients with VVI pacemakers.     

Importance of Heart Rate Response During Exercise in Patients Using Atrioventricular Synchronous and Ventricular Pacemakers

Atrioventricular synchronous pacing offers advantages over fixed-rate ventricular (VVI) pacing both at rest and during exercise. This study compared the hemodynamic effects at rest and exercise of ventricular pacing at a rate of 70 beats/min, ventricular pacing where the rate was increased during exercise and dual chamber pacing. Ten patients, age 63 +/- 8 years, with multiprogrammable DDD pacemakers were studied using supine bicycle radionuclide ventriculography. Radionuclide data during dual chamber pacing was acquired at rest and during a submaximal workload of 200-400 kpm/min. The pacemakers were then programmed to VVI pacing at a rate of 70 beats/min, and 1 week later, studies were repeated in the VVI mode at rest, during exercise at a rate of 70 beats/min, and during exercise with the VVI pacemaker programmed to a rate adapted to the DDD pacing exercise rate. At rest, the cardiac output was lower in the VVI compared with the AV sequential mode (4.1 +/- 1.1 vs 5.7 +/- 1.1 1/min, P less than 0.01). During exercise, the cardiac output increased from resting values in the DDD and VVI pacing modes, however cardiac output in the rate-adapted VVI mode was higher than in the VVI mode with the rate maintained at 70 beats/min (8.1 +/- 1.5 vs 6.3 +/- 1.1 1/min, P = 0.02). Three patients completed lower workloads with VVI pacing at 70 beats/min compared with AV synchronous pacing. At rest, AV sequential pacing was superior to VVI pacing, suggesting the importance of the atrial contribution to ventricular filling. With VVI pacing during exercise, cardiac output was improved with an increased pacemaker rate, suggesting that the heart rate response during exercise was the major determinant of the higher cardiac output.     

Pacemakers of the 1980s. An overview

Methods and devices for permanent cardiac pacing remained relatively stable for over two decades with use of the single-chamber ventricular demand (VVI) pacemaker. However, changes have occurred in the 1980s and are expected to continue with the availability of more advanced technology and with increasing knowledge about cardiac pacing. The physiologic benefit of the newer dual-chamber atrial synchronous (VDD) and fully automatic, universal (DDD) pacemakers over the VVI pacemaker in patients with permanent complete heart block and normal sinus node function has been established. These newer units not only reestablish atrioventricular synchrony but also are physiologically rate-responsive. The VDD pacemaker is expected to be phased out in favor of the DDD pacemaker. When the atrial rate or interval is lower than the lower rate limit, the VDD pacemaker functions as a VVI, whereas the DDD pacemaker functions as an atrioventricular sequential (DVI) pacemaker to maintain continuous atrioventricular synchrony. Contrary to general belief, patients with complete heart block and normal sinus node function may gain very little physiologic benefit, if any, from DVI pacing. The sinus node will compete with the pacemaker's atrial stimulation when the sinus rate is faster than the DVI pacemaker rate (which usually occurs during activity). Also, the ventricular pacing rate will not vary with physiologic change. The DVI and atrial demand (AAI) pacemakers have been used in some patients with sinus node dysfunction. Increasing exercise tolerance should not be expected in the majority of patients because they are not pacemaker-dependent during activity, ie, their heart rate is higher than the pacemaker rate. However, these pacemakers appear to help in eliminating pacemaker syndrome, which does not infrequently occur with VVI pacemakers. Patients with sinus node dysfunction but without atrioventricular block do not gain more physiologic benefit with a DDD than with a DVI pacemaker. Whether these patients have severe sinus node dysfunction all the time or adequate sinus node function most of the time during follow-up, the DDD pacemaker will function as a noncommitted DVI with atrial sensing (DDI). The early report of DVI pacemaker-induced atrial fibrillation during follow-up has been refuted by more recent works. If the DDD pacemaker is significantly more expensive than the DVI pacemaker, the latter type may be a good alternative for this condition.     

Lack of Influence of Atrioventricular Delay on Stroke Volume at Rest in Patients with Complete Atrioventricular Block and Dual Chamber Pacing

Dual chamber pacing (DDD) maintains atrioventricular (AV) sequence; AV delay programmability modifies the relationship between atrial and ventricular contraction. To evaluate the hemodynamic effects of such a modification, ten patients with a DDD unit for complete AV block were studied by time-motion (M-mode) and Doppler echocardiography during inhibited ventricular pacing (VVI), atrial-triggered ventricular pacing (VDD) and atrioventricular sequential pacing (DVI) at different AV delay (90, 140, 190, 240 msec). A significant improvement in stroke volume (SV) (15%-20%, P less than 0.05) was seen during DDD versus VVI pacing; no changes, however, were observed in the same patient with different AV delay or during DVI versus VDD pacing. These data suggest that programming of AV delay does not affect systolic performance at rest; longer diastolic filling times recorded during DDD pacing with "short" AV delay (90-140 msec) do not seem to be a hemodynamically relevant epi-phenomenon of PM programming.     

Single versus dual chamber pacing in the young: noninvasive comparative evaluation of cardiac function

The advantages of atrial synchrony over asynchronous ventricular pacing remain unclear in the young, chronically right ventricular (RV) - paced patient. This is in contrast to the older patient with inherent diastolic dysfunction who has been shown to benefit from atrial synchrony with dual chamber (DDD,R/VDD), over single chamber rate response (VVI,R) ventricular pacing. The goal of this study was to noninvasively assess cardiac function in a group of young, RV-paced patients before and after establishment of atrial synchrony. Echocardiographic data were retrospectively analyzed from 10 patients with congenital or acquired complete AV block, who were VVI,R paced for 10.2 +/- 2 years (mean age at study 19.2 +/- 8.9 years), and were subsequently converted to DDD,R/VDD pacing (mean age at study 20.7 +/- 9.5 years). Paired t-test analysis of left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic function during VVI,R versus DDD,R/VDD pacing did not result in any short-term difference in LV short axis fractional area of change or FAC (53% +/- 7.5% vs 56.8% +/- 8.7%) or mitral maximal velocity (E) normalized to mitral flow velocity time integral (VTI) (5.2/s +/- 1.5 vs 4.4/s +/- 1.5). A decrease in mitral flow E/A ratio was observed after short-term DDD,R/VDD pacing (2.2 +/- 0.5 vs 1.9 +/- 0.3). Atrial synchronous dual chamber pacing in young patients with complete AV block does not lead to any appreciable early change in global LV function over single-site RV pacing. Therefore, early establishment of atrial synchrony in the young asymptomatic VVI,R-paced patient with normal intrinsic ventricular function may not be warranted.     

Holter-Monitored Heart Rhythm During Atrioventricular Synchronous and Fixed-Rate Ventricular Pacing

The purpose of this investigation was to study rate variability during normal everyday activities among physiologically paced patients. A comparison of the spontaneous occurrence of arrhythmias with ventricular inhibited pacing was also made. VDD pacemakers in 44 patients were randomly programmed to three-week long periods of VVI (70 bpm) or VDD (back-up rate 40-50 bpm, upper rate 125-150 bpm) pacing, respectively. A Holter ECG was recorded during the last 24 hours of each period. Although the total number of QRS complexes was similar in the two pacing modes (4.3 X 10(6)/24 hours), the rate span was extensively utilized during VDD pacing. During VDD pacing, only five patients of 39 with a programmed upper rate of 150 bpm reached this limit, while one of five with 125 bpm reached that rate. Occasional episodes of pacing at the back-up rate of 40 or 50 bpm were recorded in 33 patients. Episodes of asymptomatic rhythm disturbances were recorded in both pacing modes. No significant differences existed as regards ventricular tachyarrhythmias between the two modes of pacing and it did not seem that the incidence was higher than could be expected in a patient population of the present age. Since severe AV block does not permit conduction of atrial impulses during VVI pacing, no direct comparison between the two pacing modes can be made concerning atrial tachyarrhythmias. Only one episode of pacemaker-mediated SVT was found, and this was unsymptomatic.     

Evaluation of the early hemodynamic changes in carotid arteries during ventricular and dual chamber pacing

In spite of a wide choice of pacemakers, there are some problems in making more rational clinical decisions for individual patients since mode selection and programming is usually performed on the basis of a clinical hunch. The aim of this study was to measure the differences in carotid flow in patients with a pacemaker programmed in the dual chamber and in the single chamber pacing modes. Sixty patients with implanted bipolar DDD pacemakers were enrolled in this study. Blood peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end-diastolic velocity (EDV), cross-sectional area, resistive index (RI), and pulsatility index (PI) were measured in the common (CCA), internal (ICA), and external (ECA) carotid arteries before pacemaker implantation and after dual chamber and ventricular pacing at 60 beats/min. PSVs in the left CCA (79.3 +/- 24.9 cm/s) and right CCA (84.1 +/- 18.7) were shown to significantly decrease after VVI pacing (60.1 +/- 16.6 and 62.1 +/- 20.0, respectively). There was also a similar significant decrease in PSV in the left and right ICAs and ECAs. Besides PSV, RI, and PI in the left and right CCAs, ICAs, and ECAs significantly decreased after VVI pacing. There was no similar decrease after DDD pacing. Cross-sectional area and flow volume in the CCA, ICA, and ECA were similar after DDD and VVI pacing and before pacemaker implantation suggesting that cardiac output was similar when the measurements were recorded. Carotid artery PSVs, pulsatility, and RIs were found to be significantly decreased during VVI pacing compared to baseline and DDD pacing. The greater incidence of adverse cerebral outcomes in patients with VVI rather than DDD pacing may be partly due to decreased carotid PSVs.     

Validation of a Method for Choice of Pacing Mode in Carotid Sinus Syndrome With or Without Sinus Bradycardia

A new method for selection of the pacing mode in 60 consecutive patients with severe cardie-inhibitory or mixed carotid sinus syndrome was prospectively validated. ODD pacing was preferred for 26 patients with: (1) the cardioinhibitory form and who had symptomatic pacemaker effect; (2) mixed type I form, (cardioinhibitory and vasodepressor) with symptomatic pacemaker effect, ventriculoatrial conduction or orthostatic hypotension; (3) mixed type II; or (4) severe bradycardia. VVI pacing was seiected in the remaining 34 patients without these symptoms. During a 32 ± 10 month follow-up period syncope and severe dizziness persisted in five patients in the VVI group (15%) and in three patients in the ODD group (12%). Symptomatic relief occurred in 87% (52/60) of patients. Minor symptoms persisted in 47% of the VVI group and 42% of the DDD group. No patient developed cardiac insufficiency or intolerance to pacing. During a 2-month duration a single-blind, randomized, cross-over study compared VVI and DDD pacing, 69% of the patients programmed from DDD to VVI suffered more frequent, severe, and intolerable symptoms. (1) Thirty four of 60 patients (57% of the entire group) in whom VVI pacing was satisfactory were identified prior to pacemaker implant. In the remainder, VVI pacing was contraindicated as it produced frequent side effects. (2) The preimplant predictive value that VVI pacing would be successful was 85% for those eventually receiving VVI pacemakers and the preimplant predictive value that VVI pacing would fail was 69% for those who underwent DDD implant.     

Short-Term and Long-Term Changes of Left Ventricular Volumes During Rate-Adaptive and Single-Rate Pacing

To evaluate the adaptation of the heart to exercise during pacing, 15 patients with permanent endocardial pacemakers were studied; nine patients had atrioventricular universal (DDD) pacemakers (Symbios 7005) and six patients had activity detecting rate-responsive ventricular (VVIR) pacemakers (Activitrax 8403). Left ventricular function in each patient during rate variable pacing was compared to ventricular function during VVI single-rate pacing. End-systolic and end-diastolic volume changes during exercise were measured by radionuclide angiography and the amount of volume change was used to assess left ventricular function. Both short-term (within 4 hours) and long-term measurements (after at least 4 weeks) were made at rest and at 50% of the maximal exercise capacity in DDD or VVIR mode and were compared with VVI single-rate pacing. All patients, when changed from DDD or VVIR mode to VVI single-rate pacing showed a significant increase of the end-diastolic volume during exercise, which increased even more after long-term VVI pacing. During long-term rate variable pacing, there was no increase of the end-diastolic volume during exercise. DDD or VVIR pacing initially showed a substantial increase of the end-systolic volume during exercise combined with a decrease of left ventricular ejection fraction, suggesting a decrease of the left ventricular contractility. After 4 weeks, contractility improved both with DDD and VVIR pacing. We conclude that short-term DDD and VVIR pacing induces a temporary impairment of left ventricular function that improves after 4 weeks, whereas long-term VVI pacing is associated with left ventricular dilatation even at moderate levels of exercise.     

Inappropriate Sensing of Atrial Stimuli in Patients with Third-Generation Defibrillators and DDD Pacemakers

Although the problem of ICD sensing of paced ventricular stimuli has been resolved by incorporation of VVI pacing into current ICDs, many patients require separate DDD pacemakers. We report a problematic PM-ICD interaction: the inability to prevent sensing of paced atrial stimuli (atrial sensing) leading to double-counting in DDD-PM-requiring patients with transvenous (TV) ICDs with aggressive autogain sensing (CPI Ventak® PRxII or III). Four of eight patients receiving both transvenous DDD PMs and ICDs (CPI Endotak® lead, at the RV apex), had atrial sensing, leading to double counting, despite intraoperative testing of multiple atrial locations with an active fixation lead. Five patients had a PRxlI/III ICD, four with atrial sensing (80%), and three a PRx without atrial sensing. Patients with atrial sensing were not distinguished by any clinical or device related variable. In patients with atrial sensing (all with heart block), the PM was programmed to VDD mode. No patient has received inappropriate therapy or failed to sense VP in follow-up. In many patients with TV ICDs who require DDD pacing, no atrial position can be found without ICD sensing of atrial stimuli. While in patients with heart block this problem can be circumvented by programming to the VDD mode, in patients with sinus incompetence it may only be resolved by the combination ICD-DDD PM, currently in development.     

Efficacy of single lead VDD pacing in patients with impaired and normal left ventricular function

Atrial synchronous ventricular pacing seems to be the best pacing mode for patients with advanced AV block and impaired LV function. The long-term follow-up of single lead VDD pacing was studied in 33 patients with impaired LV function and compared to 42 patients with normal LV function. All patients received the same VDD lead and VDDR pacemaker. The lead model with 13-cm AV spacing between the atrial and ventricular electrode was implanted in 89% of the patients. Follow-ups were 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after implantation. The percentage of atrial sensing and the P wave amplitude were determined at each follow-up. Minimal P wave amplitude at implantation was 2.0 +/- 1.4 mV in patients with impaired and 1.7 +/- 0.9 mV with normal LV function (not significant). At the 12-month follow-up, 33 patients with normal and 23 patients with depressed LV function remained paced in the VDD mode. The remaining patients died in five (impaired LV function) and seven cases (normal LV function) or their pacemakers were programmed to the VVI/VVIR pacing mode in four (impaired LV function) and three cases (normal LV function). P wave amplitude did not differ in the two groups (e.g., at month 12: impaired: 1.17 +/- 0.42 mV; normal: 1.09 +/- 0.49 mV). The atrial sensitivity was programmed in most patients to sensitive settings with no differences between the two groups (e.g., at month 12: impaired: 0.13 +/- 0.06 mV; normal: 0.13 +/- 0.05 mV). The diagnostic counters indicated nearly permanent atrial sensing (e.g., at month 12: impaired: 99.3 +/- 2.2%; normal: 99.0 +/- 1.0 mV). In conclusions, single lead VDD pacing restored AV synchronous ventricular pacing in patients with normal and with impaired LV function indicating that it could be an alternative to DDD pacemakers, but not to dual-chamber pacing.     

不同心脏起搏方式对左室收缩功能的影响

目的应用超声心动图方法探讨不同心脏起搏方式对左室收缩功能的影响，选择30例置入DDD起搏器的病窦综合征患者。将起搏方式由DDD随机程控为VVI，AAI模式，观察左室收缩功能指标；每次测量间隔5min以上。结果VVI起搏时左室收缩功能最差，与AAI和DDD起搏相比，VVI起搏时收缩功能标：SV，CO，EF均明显降低，而ESV明显增大。与DDD起搏相比，AAI起搏时SV，CO，LVEF均明显增大。结论房室同步和心室同步对左室收缩功能均有重要影响；病窦综合征患者，加强心室起搏管理，在提供双腔支持的安全前提下，以AAI（R）模式作为基本治疗模式，减少右心室起搏，对改善患者的左室功能有重要意义。     

Changes in QT and Q-aT Intervals Induced by Mental and Physical Stress with Fixed Rate and Atrial Triggered Ventricular Inhibited Cardiac Pacing

We have investigated the influence of mental stress and physical stress, i.e., exercise, on the QT and Q-aT intervals (measured from the pacemaker stimulus to the end or the apex, respectively, of the T wave). The study was made on ten patients with high degree atrioventricular block treated with AV universal (DDD) pacemakers. These were programmed to a fixed rate ventricular (VVI) or an atrial triggered (VDD) function for different parts of the study. An arithmetic mental stress test and a bicycle exercise test were performed with each mode of pacing. In the VVI pacing mode, the atrial rate increased by 11% during mental stress and by 46% during exercise. There was a significant shortening of QT and Q-aT intervals with both types of stress. With VDD pacing, mental stress induced a 12% increase in rate and a significant shortening of QT and Q-aT. The paced rate increased by 50% during the exercise test. This increase in ventricular rate was associated with the most marked changes in QT and Q-aT intervals. Thus, both types of stress cause a significant shortening of the QT and Q-aT interval even in the absence of a simultaneous increase in ventricular rate. When the latter is allowed to increase during VDD pacing, both intervals shorten considerably more. There was a marked inter-individual variability in the response to both types of stress. These findings are of importance with regard to the QT sensing rate responsive pacemaker which can be expected to respond to mental stress in most patients, but that response might be unpredictable in the individual.     

A clinical evaluation of the current methods for cardiac pacing electrostimulation

A comparative analysis was done of the results of 250 operations--implantations of the different systems of cardiac pacing. Use was made of ventricular pacing (VVI), atrial pacing (AAI), different modes of dual chamber pacing (VDD, DVI, DDD), and of rate responsive pacing (Activitrax, Sensolog, Meta-MV). Indications and contraindications for use of pacemakers of different types are discussed as are potential complications consequent on the use of different modes of cardiac pacing.     

Effects of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy on Cardiac Pacemakers and its Safety in Patients with Implanted Cardiac Pacemakers

Ejects of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) were studied on 15 pacemakers (standard single chamber n = 5, dual chamber n = 6, rate responsive single chamber [Activitrax] n = 4). In-vitro testing involved suspending the pacemakers in a bath of degassified, deionized water firmly taped to a platform at the point of maximal pressure, i.e., second focal point (F2), where they received pressure shocks (x?= 1300) from the HM3 Dornier lithotriptor. The pacemakers, programmed to their most sensitive setting, were continuously pacing at nominal outputs (atria) and ventricular pacing in the DDD mode). All units were assessed by a pacing system analyzer before and after the study, then underwent destructive analysis. During standard single chamber pacing (VVI) the pacing stimulus triggered ESWL. For dual chamber devices, ESWL was triggered by the atrial paced event which induced inhibition of the ventricular output in two pacemaker. This was eliminated by reprogramming to a less sensitive setting. The pacemaker can, hermetic seal and internal circuitry were undamaged in all units. Two rate responsive single chamber pacemakers had their activity sensing piezoelectric elements shattered when placed at F2. Two other units placed 5 cm from F2 were stimulated to their maximum upper programmed pacing rate with ESWL therapy, but were otherwise unaffected. Subsequent to this study, six patients with pacemakers programmed to the VVI (five), DDD (one) modes implanted in the thorax underwent successful ESWL without pacemaker or arrhythmic event. Conclusions: (A) It is generally safe for patients implanted with standard single chamber devices in a ventricular application to undergo ESWL without modifying the pacing/sensing parameters. (B) Patients implanted with dual chamber devices who pace in the atrium should be reprogrammed to the VVI mode during ESWL. (C) Patients with piezoelectric activity sensing rate responsive single chamber pacemakers should have this feature programmed off during ESWL and, if implanted in the abdomen, probably should not undergo ESWL.     

Is DDD Pacing Superior to VVI,R? A Study on Cardiac Sympathetic Nerve Activity and Myocardial Oxygen Consumption at Rest and During Exercise

Rate responsive ventricular pacing (VVI,R) has been demonstrated to equal atrial synchronous ventricular pacing (DDD) with regard to hemodynamics and exercise tolerance. Whether the two modes are also comparable, with regard to cardiac metabolic effects, is not yet dear. We assessed central hemodynamics, cardiac sympathetic nerve activity fcardiac norepinephrine overflow), and myocardial oxygen consumption in 16 patients treated with rate responsive atrial synchronous ventricular pacemakers (DDD,R), due to high degree AV block. The study was performed at rest and during supine exercise at two workloads (30 ± 12 and 68 ± 24 watts, respectively) during VDD and rate matched VVI pacing (VVI_m). Ventricular rates at rest and during both workloads were almost identical. Cardiac output at rest tended to be higher in the VDD mode, due to a slightly higher stroke volume. Central pressures including right atrial pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure were similar in the pacing modes. The coronary sinus blood flow, the coronary sinus arteriovenous oxygen difference, and the myocardial oxygen consumption did not differ between the two pacing modes. Cardiac norepinephrine overflow was similar in the two pacing modes, at rest or during exercise. Thus, we found no significant differences between VDD and VVI_m pacing with regard to central hemodynamics, cardiac sympathetic nerve activity (cardiac norepinephrine overflow), or myocardial oxygen consumption either at rest or during moderate exercise.     

Superior Cardiac Hemodynamics of Atrioventricular Synchrony Over Rate Responsive Pacing at Submaximal Exercise: Observations in Activity Sensing DDDR Pacemakers

LAU, C.-P., ET AL.: Superior Cardiac Hemodynamics of Atrioventricular Synchrony Over Rate Responsive Pacing at Submaximal Exercise: Observations in Activity Sensing DDDR Pacemakers. The relative hemodynamic profile between dual chamber pacing (DDD) and activity sensing rate responsive pacing (VVIR) was compared in ten patients with dual chamber rate responsive pacemakers (Synergist 11). With a double blind, randomized exercise protocol, DDDR pacemakers were programmed into VVI, VVIR, and DDD (AV interval 150 msec) modes and in seven patients the test in the DDD mode was repeated with the AV interval programmed at 75 msec. A treadmill exercise test of 6-minutes duration (2 stages, Stage 1 at 2 mph, 0% gradient and Stage II at 2 mph, 15% gradient) was performed at each of the programmed settings, with a rest period of 30 minutes in between tests. Cardiac output was assessed using continuous-wave Doppler sampling ascending aortic flow and expressed as a percentage of the value achieved during VVI pacing. During exercise, pacing rate between DDD and VVIR pacing was similar but was higher with DDD at the first minute of recovery (91 ± 4vs 81 ± 3 beat/min, respectively). Cardiac output was significantly higher at rest, during low level exercise, and recovery with DDD pacing compared with VVIR pacing (resting: 21 ± 14 vs -2 ± 7%; Stage I: 36 ± 6 vs 16 ± 7%; Stage II: 25 ± 15 vs 10 ± 8%; recovery: 26 ± 12 vs 4 ± 9%; p < 0.05 in all cases). Systolic blood pressure was significantly higher during low level of exercise in the DDD mode. Shortening of the AV interval to 75 msec did not significantly affect cardiac output during exercise, but cardiac output after exercise was reduced (2 ± 6 vs 23 ± 6% at an AV interval of 150 msec, p < 0.02). By enhancing the stroke volume, DDD pacing improves cardiac hemodynamics at rest, during low level exercise, and early postexercise recovery.