贵阳市宫颈高级别鳞状上皮内病变及宫颈癌患者HPV亚型分布状况及感染状态分析

目的探讨贵阳市高致癌性人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)基因亚型及感染特点。方法对907例高级别及以上病变(HSIL+)患者的宫颈脱落细胞进行HPV分型检测,分析HPV基因亚型的分布状况及感染状态。结果①HSIL组感染率最高的7种HPV亚型为HPV16、52、58、33、51、18及31型,ICC组感染率最高的7种HPV亚型为HPV16、58、18、33、39、52、53型;ICC组与HSIL组比较,HPV16型、18型感染率升高,差异有统计学意义(χ~2=38.573,P 0.001;χ~2=7.817,P=0.005);②HSIL+患者以HPV单一型别感染为主,ICC组较HSIL组HPV多重型别感染率下降。结论 HPV16、18型是贵阳市宫颈癌高致癌性基因亚型,58、52、33型亦属常见高危亚型;HSIL+患者以HPV单一型别感染为主,HPV多重感染不增加宫颈癌的发病概率。     

宫颈重度鳞状上皮内病变和宫颈癌组织中人乳头瘤病毒感染及基因分型的研究

目的:探讨人乳头瘤病毒感染及其基因型与宫颈重度鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)和宫颈癌的关系.方法:采用可检测25种HPV基因型的基因芯片方法分别检测HSIL(23例)和宫颈癌(46例)组织的HPV基因型,计算两组患者宫颈组织中HPV的感染率及各基因型的感染率,比较HPV及其主要基因型与宫颈病变的关系.结果:69例宫颈病变患者中HPV阳性率为98.55%(68/69);HSIL组单一型别感染率为81.82%,多型别感染率为18.18%,HPV的型别分布以HPV16、52、58最常见;宫颈癌患者中单一型别感染率为95.45%,多型别感染率为4.55%,HPV的型别分布以HPV16、58最常见.所检出的HPV型别中以HPV16的检出率最高.结论:①HPV感染,特别是高危型HPV感染与HSIL和宫颈癌的关系密切;②宫颈病变严重程度可能与HPV基因型多寡无关,而与感染HPV亚型的致病能力密切相关;③HSIL与宫颈癌感染的HPV基因型呈多样性.且均为高危型感染,其中以HPV 16型最常见.     

22234例子宫颈高危型HPV感染及亚型分布研究

目的:分析17种型别的高危型人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)在22234例子宫颈癌筛查中的感染率及亚型分布特点。方法:回顾性分析2018年1月1日至2019年1月1日22234例于华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院行子宫颈癌筛查患者高危型HPV感染率及感染亚型。结果:22234例接受子宫颈癌筛查患者中,一种或以上高危型HPV阳性者3574例(16.1%),其中HPV16或(和)HPV18阳性者703例(3.2%)。在3574例高危型HPV阳性女性中,最常见的高危HPV感染是HPV52(24.4%),其次为HPV58(16.5%)、HPV16(14.0%)、HPV53(12.6%)和HPV39(8.6%)。与HPV16阴性患者相比,在HPV16阳性的患者中,除HPV31、HPV35、HPV45、HPV26和HPV82以外的12种高危型HPV的感染风险均显著降低约2~5倍(OR 0.169~0.530,P<0.05);与HPV18阴性患者相比,HPV18阳性的患者中HPV16、HPV33、HPV39、HPV51、HPV52、HPV58和HPV53的感染风险均显著下降(P<0.05)。结论:女性高危型HPV感染率较高,最常见的高危型HPV是HPV52和HPV58感染,并且HPV16、18感染对多个其他型别高危型HPV感染有保护作用。     

宫颈癌机会性筛查人群中高危型HPV感染状况及其与宫颈病变关系的研究

目的:分析宫颈癌机会性筛查人群中高危型HPV感染情况及其与宫颈病变的关系。方法:统计2015年6月至2016年11月于北京大学第三医院行宫颈癌机会性筛查人群中HPV 16型、18型及其他12种HPV亚型的阳性率,计算高危型HPV阳性转诊阴道镜人群中发生CINⅡ及以上(CINⅡ~+)的比率及CINⅡ~+人群中HPV的感染构成情况。结果:宫颈癌机会性筛查人群中,高危型HPV总阳性率为19.0%,HPV 16阳性率为5.0%,HPV 18阳性率为1.6%,其他12种HPV阳性率为15.2%。HPV 16阳性、HPV 18阳性及其他12种HPV阳性患者TCT分流检测≥ASCUS者均转诊阴道镜病理活检,其发生CINⅡ~+的比率依次为55.2%、35.5%及38.9%;发生CINⅢ及以上(CINⅢ~+)的比率依次为25.3%、7.7%及6.9%。CINⅡ~+中45.0%为其他12种HPV感染、46.3%为HPV16感染、8.7%为HPV 18感染,其余病例为HPV阴性。结论:宫颈癌机会性筛查人群中,CINⅡ~+患者HPV 18阳性所占比率较低,其他12种HPV阳性所占比率高。需对各亚型阳性率进行细致分型以协助评估发病风险。转诊阴道镜人群中,HPV 18阳性者及其他12种HPV阳性患者TCT检查为ASCUS/LSIL者发生CINⅡ~+风险相对较低,可考虑通过行分流检测以提高筛查的特异性。     

HPV亚型在宫颈疾病中的分布特点

目的:探讨HPV亚型在宫颈疾病谱中,即从正常宫颈(慢性宫颈炎)、宫颈上皮内瘤变(CINⅠ、CINⅡ和CINⅢ)到宫颈癌连续发展中的分布特点。方法:回顾分析2005年6月～2008年6月在我院妇科因宫颈疾病就诊的189例患者HPV亚型检测的结果。结果:HPV总感染率56.1%(106/189),复合感染率22.6%(24/106)。正常者HPV感染率19.1%(12/63),检测到的HPV亚型主要是HPV52,58,53,16和33。CINⅠ者HPV感染率57.9%(22/38),最常见的HPV亚型是HPV52,其次是HPV58,16,33和18。CINⅡ者HPV感染率70.5%(31/44),HPV52,16,58,33和18等亚型最常见。CINⅢ者HPV感染率89.3%(25/28),HPV亚型以HPV16,52,58,31,33为主。宫颈癌患者,HPV阳性率100%(16/16),HPV16检测率最高,其次是HPV18,52,58和33。结论:宫颈疾病谱中最常见的高危型HPV亚型是HPV16。不同宫颈病变中HPV亚型感染的差异可能反映了其潜在转归能力,同时提示临床医师应关注宫颈疾病患者高危HPV亚型情况。     

都市高收入人群宫颈高危HPV感染与TCT的相关研究

目的了解北京市高收入女性人群宫颈高危HPV感染常见分型及高危HPV感染与液基细胞学异常的相关性。方法对2008年1月至2008年12月间就诊于北京五洲女子医院妇科门诊的女性2023例,采用导流杂交法进行16、18、31、33、35、39、45、51、52、53、56、58、59、66、68、6、11、42、43、44、CP8304等21种宫颈人乳头状瘤病毒亚型的分型检测。同时进行液基薄层细胞学检测(TCT)。结果检测2023人次中感染高危HPV亚型618例,感染率30.5%,排在前5位的高危亚型是58(21.68%)、16(16.99%)、33(11.32%)、53(8.09%)、52(7.76%)。感染高危HPV618例中TCT异常的278例,其中ASCUS133例、LSIL124例、HSIL21例。结论北京市高收入女性人群宫颈高危HPV感染率较高,主要为单一感染,感染亚型主要是58、16、33、53、52型。其中16、58型的致病性较其他分型高。     

HPV分型定量检测对宫颈病变的预测价值

目的:探讨人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)分型定量检测对宫颈病变的预测价值。方法:2045例宫颈病变患者组织病理学检查诊断为宫颈炎695例、宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)I 247例、CINII 294例、CINIII 407例、宫颈癌(CC)402例。实时定量荧光PCR法(硕世21 HPV分型定量检测系统)检测高危型(HR)-HPV分型及病毒载量。采用ANOVA检验分析病毒载量与宫颈病变之间的关系。应用ROC曲线的方法确定预测CINII+的cut off值。结果:CIN人群中最常见的HPV感染亚型依次为HPV16、58、33、52、31、18。CIN及CC中最常见的HPV感染亚型依次为HPV16、58、33、52、18、31。随着宫颈病变级别的增加,HPV16、18亚型病毒载量的中位值随之增加,差异有统计学意义(P0.001)。HPV16/18型临床cut off值分别为1.59×104拷贝数/104细胞和1.56×104拷贝数/104细胞时,可预测HPV16、18型感染患者患有CINII+的敏感性分别为77.93%和79.26%,特异性分别为53.51%和67.82%。结论:在中国除了HPV16、18亚型外,HPV33、52、58型感染也应受到重视。HPV病毒载量作为宫颈癌风险标记物具有型别依赖性,通过获取HPV16、18基因型载量的合适阈值,可对CINII+做出风险提示和最佳预测。     

广西沿海地区妇女宫颈癌患者人乳头瘤病毒（HPV）感染各亚型分布特点

目的探讨广西沿海地区妇女宫颈癌患者人乳头瘤状病毒（human papillomavirus,HPV）感染分布情况及主要型别,为广西沿海地区临床防治宫颈癌、研制适合该地区的预防性HPV疫苗提供理论依据。方法采用人乳头瘤病毒核酸扩增分型检测试剂盒方法,对76例广西沿海地区妇女经病理确诊宫颈癌患者的宫颈脱落细胞进行HPV基因分型检测。结果 76例宫颈癌患者中有69例HPV阳性,阳性率为90.8%,其中,HPV16感染率最高为56.5%,其他高危型的感染率从高到低依次为HPV18、33、58、52、53、31、45、35、39、51、56、66、68。低危型中HPV6型感染率最高为5.8%,其他低危型的感染率从高到低依次为HPV11、43、44。多重感染率为20.3%。正常对照组60例中有13例HPV阳性（21.7%）。其中,13例阳性标本中,HPV16感染率最高为30.8%,其他高危型HPV31、52、53感染率为15.4%,低危型HPV11、43、44感染率为7.7%。宫颈癌HPV阳性率明显高于正常对照组,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.005）。结论广西沿海地区妇女宫颈癌患者中以HPV16、18、33、58感染为主要型别,可能是广西沿海地区妇女宫颈癌较易感染的型别。     

人乳头瘤病毒基因亚型分布及与宫颈病变关系分析

目的:探讨女性HPV感染率和基因亚型分布,分析其与宫颈病变的关系.方法:收集四川大学华西第二医院2011年9月至2012年8月妇科就诊29832例女性患者的宫颈脱落细胞进行HPV基因分型检测.对2398例同时具有宫颈活检组织病理诊断结果的患者进行分组,包括慢性宫颈炎症组599例;CIN Ⅰ组437例;CINⅡ/Ⅲ组906例(CINⅡ338例,CINⅢ568例);宫颈癌组456例.结果:HPV感染率为25.20％(7518/29832),其中高危型HPV、低危型HPV、HPV多重感染率分别为21.03％(6275/29832)、4.17％(1243/29832)、5.94％(1772/29832).常见的高危型HPV为HPV16、58、33、52、18.随着年龄增加,HPV感染率呈现增高趋势.随着宫颈病变的严重程度增加,HPV感染率增高.所有宫颈病变中,常见的高危型HPV由高至低依次为HPV16、58、33、18、52;在宫颈癌组中为HPV16、18、58、33、52;在CINⅡ/Ⅲ组为16、58、33、52、18.在HPV阳性的不同程度宫颈病变中均以单一感染为主,除慢性宫颈炎组外,单一感染的比例随宫颈病变程度增加而增加.结论:本研究最常见的高危型HPV为16、58、33、52、18,与其他地区相比存在一定的地区差异.HPV感染率随年龄增加呈现增高趋势.在不同宫颈病变中,HPV的型别分布有所不同,单一感染可能更易导致宫颈癌的发生.     

HPV亚型感染的地域分布与宫颈病变的关系

目的:探讨人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)亚型感染与宫颈病变的关系.方法:以桂北地区育龄妇女为研究对象,对门诊就诊的1086病例进行HPV分型检测和液基细胞学检查,对细胞学诊断≥ASCUS及HPV检测为阳性的病例进行阴道镜下宫颈组织活检.结果:①HPV检测阳性率为43.92%(477/1086);液基细胞学诊断≥ASCUS为31.49%(342/1086).在ASCUS、LSIL、HSIL、SCC中HPV的检出率分别为51.45%、70.27%、91.30%、100%.②细胞学诊断阳性≥LSIL(18.78%.204/1086)与组织学诊断阳性≥CIN Ⅰ(21.36%,232/1086)比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.250,P＞0.05),细胞学与组织学诊断符合率100%为SCC、80.23%为HSIL和90.98%为LSIL.组织学诊断CIN Ⅰ、CIN Ⅱ、CIN Ⅲ、SCC病变中HPV检出率以68.03%、81.67%、93.37%、100%依次递增.③1086例样本中HPV感染共检出21种亚型,低危型4种占17.19%、高危型17种占82.81%,随宫颈病变程度的增加,HPV亚型分布有所变化,低度病变组(CIN Ⅰ)以HPV16、58、18、56、11和52为常见类型;而高度病变组(CINⅡ～Ⅲ)以HPV16、58、18、56、33、52和11型为最常见.24例宫颈癌共检出6种高危亚型HPV,分别是HPV16、58、18、59、66和33型.HPV16亚型随宫颈病变级别加重感染率呈上升趋势(P＜0.0125).结论:桂北地区宫颈病变常见的HPV亚型是HPV16、58、18、56、33、52和11型,HPV16致癌性最强;HPV分型检测因其准确性高并能明确基因类型,联合液基细胞学和组织学更能有效地筛查宫颈病变细胞.为临床防治宫颈癌提供更可靠的科学依据.     

维、汉妇女宫颈癌患者感染HPV亚型和TERC基因扩增的关系

目的探讨新疆地区维吾尔族、汉族妇女宫颈癌感染人乳头瘤病毒（HPV）不同亚型及人染色体端粒酶基因（TERC）扩增差异。方法采用导流杂交基因芯片技术检测维吾尔族和汉族各200例宫颈癌患者的21种HPV亚型感染的分布情况。采用荧光原位杂交技术（FISH）检测23例维吾尔族和22例汉族宫颈癌患者的TERC基因扩增的情况。结果①维、汉族宫颈癌的HPV感染谱不同。维吾尔族宫颈癌中HPV高危亚型感染排序由高到低主要是：HPV16、58、18、52和31等亚型;而汉族宫颈癌的排序是：HPV16、31、58、18和52等亚型。②维吾尔族宫颈癌中HPV亚型多重感染者为43例,占21.83%;汉族宫颈癌组织中多重感染者为27例,占13.78%（P〈0.05）。③维、汉族宫颈癌TERC基因平均扩增倍数,在HPV各亚型感染组间差异无统计学意义,但在各族患者中HPV多重感染和单一感染其差异均有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论维吾尔族宫颈癌患者HPV高危亚型多重感染较汉族高;在各族患者中多重HPV高危亚型感染较单一亚型感染者有更多TERC基因扩增。     

Association between cervical schistosomiasis and cervical cancer. A report of 2 cases

BACKGROUND: HPV is now considered the most important risk factor for the development of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cancer. Although CIN and cancer have been previously reported in association with cervical schistosomiasis, those reports failed to control for the potential coexistence of high-risk HPV. CASES: Two women, 1 with high grade CIN and 1 with invasive cervical cancer, were negative for high-risk HPV subtypes. Evidence of cervical and systemic schistosomal infestation was evident in both cases. CONCLUSION: In support of prior published studies, cervical schistosomiasis seems to be a possible risk factor for the development of CIN and cancer. As populations around the world migrate, North American colposcopists need to become aware of this association.     

HPV detection and genotyping as an earlier approach in cervical cancer screening of the female genital tract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is the leading risk factor for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cervical cancer. More than 100 virus genotypes have been identified so far, some of them strongly associated with the development of neoplasia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of the different HPV genotypes in women presenting no cytological alterations in cervical cells, in women presenting light alterations, and in women presenting severe alterations at routine gynecological examination. We retrospectively analyzed 97 HPV results of women submitted to cervical cancer screening compared to their Papanicolaou and colposcopy examinations. Data were analyzed individually and within groups to correlate the HPV genotypes identified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and the respective alterations in cervical cells. Among the nine cases diagnosed as CIN I (9.3%), two were positive for low-risk HPV genotypes (22%), and the other seven were negative for HPV by PCR (78%). CIN II or CIN III diagnoses were associated with positive HPV results by PCR in four cases (36%), for high-risk as well as low-risk genotypes. There were two patients with severe cytological alterations in cervical cells, but with an indeterminate HPV genotype (18%), and one case with a negative HPV result (9%). Among the 57 cases without cytological alterations, seven were positive for low-risk HPV (12%) and two for high-risk HPV genotypes (3.5%). In the 48 remaining cases, we observed one with an indeterminate HPV genotype (2%), and the other 47 were negative for HPV by PCR (47%). Our study demonstrates an important prevalence of high- and low-risk HPV genotypes in our population, including those not present in the commercially available vaccine, even in patients with no evidence of cytological alterations in cervical cells. These results highlight the usefulness of HPV detection and typing as an early approach for cervical cancer screening and prevention.     

Human papillomavirus in malignant cervical lesions in Surinam, a high-risk country, compared to the Netherlands, a low-risk country

Krul EJT, van de Vijver MJ, Schuuring E, Van Kanten RW, Peters AAW, Fleuren GJ. Human papillomavirus in malignant cervical lesions in Surinam, a high-risk country, compared to the Netherlands, a low-risk country. Int J Gynecol Cancer 1999; 9: 206–211.
In various countries epidemiologic studies show an association between human papillomavirus (HPV) and cancer of the uterine cervix. We determined the presence of HPV and the distribution of the different HPV genotypes in cervical carcinomas from Surinam, a high-incidence country. The results were compared to the Netherlands where the incidence is five times lower. One hundred thirty cervical carcinomas from patients in Surinam were randomly selected and compared to an unselected group of 128 cervical carcinomas from caucasoid Dutch patients. Presence of HPV and distribution of HPV genotypes was determined in DNA extracted from paraffin-embedded specimens by polymerase chain reaction and sequence analysis. HPV DNA was detected in 82% of the Surinamese cervical cancer patients and in 87% of the Dutch patients. Thirteen different HPV genotypes were detected in the Surinamese group, and nine different HPV genotypes were detected in the Dutch group. Among the HPV-positive samples, HPV 16 was present in 68% in the Netherlands compared to only 49% in Surinam, where less common genotypes such as HPV 35, 45, and 58 were more prevalent. The results show a strong association between HPV and cervical cancer in both groups. However, the observed significant variation in distribution of the genotypes in the two populations with a large difference in cervical carcinoma incidence is important to the general understanding of the etiology of cervical cancer and to the development of HPV vaccination strategies.     

Human papillomavirus infection in the female population of Antwerp, Belgium: prevalence in healthy women, women with premalignant lesions and cervical cancer

Worldwide there is a strong relation between the presence of human papillomavirus (HPV) and the development of cervical cancer. This study investigated the prevalence and genotype of HPV in women with normal smears, women with premalignant lesions and women with cervical cancer in Antwerp, Belgium. Type-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for HPV types 16 and 18 and general primer PCR (GP5+/6+) was performed on DNA extracted from paraffin-embedded tissue from women with lesions or fresh material from controls. HPV was detected in 11% of controls, 61% of women with atypia, 77% of women with CIN lesions and 88% of women with cervical carcinoma (chi2 trend, 273, p<0.001). The odds ratio for high-risk HPV types was 9.3 for atypia (95%CI. 4.3-19.8), 33.6 for CIN lesions (95%CI, 19.3-58.6) and 78.8 for cervical cancer (95%CI, 39.2-158.3). In total, 19 different HPV genotypes were detected, including five low risk HPV types. Seven of the 14 high-risk HPV types were detected in cervical cancer patients. Based on our study it is suggested that a prophylactic vaccine based on a cocktail of a limited number of high-risk HPV types should be considered in order to protect most women from developing cervical cancer.     

人乳头瘤病毒检测临床应用误区

高危型人乳头瘤病毒（HPV）的持续感染是宫颈癌和宫颈癌前病变发生的重要原因,HPV检测有效地提高了宫颈癌筛查的敏感度,是宫颈癌筛查的重要方法。但由于HPV检测方法众多,各种检测方法的设计、原理以及临床阳性阈值设定存在差异等因素,临床应用中容易存在误区。     

Human papillomavirus typing in HIV-positive women

OBJECTIVE: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the major cause of cervical carcinoma and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia worldwide. Certain HPV types have a strong association with and probably a causative role in the pathogenesis of premalignant cervical lesions. Epidemiologic studies in women infected by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) have shown an increased incidence of squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs), which were predominantly high-grade. Six to 30 per cent of women diagnosed with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) on a Papanicolaou (Pap) smear harbor SIL in normal screening populations. This study was undertaken to determine the presence of low-and high-risk HPV types in women infected by HIV and to correlate the results to those of the Pap smear. STUDY DESIGN: HPV DNA typing (low- and high-risk) by Digene (Digene Corporation, Gathesburg, MD) hybrid capture methodology was performed on cervical swabs from 209 HIV-positive women. The results of HPV typing were correlated with those of the Pap smear in a retrospective analysis. RESULTS: One hundred and one women (48%) tested positive for HPV subtypes by DNA typing by the hybrid capture method. Of these, 64 patients (63%) had Pap smears which were read as being normal, having benign cellular changes, or having ASCUS (favor reactive process). Of these, 19 patients tested positive for both high-risk and low-risk subtypes, 32 patients tested positive only for high-risk subtypes, and 13 patients tested positive only for low-risk subtypes. CONCLUSION: HPV subtyping identifies a significant group of HIV-positive women who are at risk for developing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, although they may not show significant abnormalities on their Pap smears.     

宫颈疾病HPV混合型感染的检测与分析

目的:探讨人乳头状瘤病毒(HPV)混合型感染导流杂交法检测宫颈疾病的价值。方法:用导流杂交法,检测本地区304例妇女(其中宫颈癌组35例、宫颈上皮内瘤变组20例、炎症组140例和正常组109例)宫颈脱落细胞21种HPV基因亚型,分析各组患者HPV多重感染的特点。结果:304例标本中检出HPV阳性94例,包括混合型30例,HPV多重感染检出率在宫颈癌组、宫颈上皮内瘤变组、炎症组和正常组分别为34.3%、20.0%、7.1%和2.8%,各组HPV混合型感染率差异有统计学意义(χ2=463.579,P<0.001);混合型感染中检出的HPV亚型由高到低依次为:HPV-16(19.2%)、HPV-52(13.7%)、HPV-58(12.3%)、HPV-18(8.2%)、HPV-11(6.8%)、HPV-6(6.8%)、HPV-31(5.5%)、HPV-33(5.5%)、HPV-66(5.5%)、HPV-39(4.1%)、HPV-53(4.1%)、HPV-68(4.1%)、HPV-56(1.4%)、HPV-59(1.4%)、CP8304(1.4%)。各疾病组检出的混合型HPV感染前3位HPV基因型均为高危型。结论:宫颈癌HPV多重感染率高,主要系高危HPV型感染所致;导流杂交法HPV混合型感染检测值得在宫颈疾病诊断中推广应用。     

导流杂交基因芯片技术在人乳头状瘤病毒检测中应用的研究

目的评价导流杂交基因芯片技术,即凯普导流杂交HPV DNA检测法（简称HybriMax）在女性生殖道人乳头状瘤病毒（HPV）感染检测中的临床效用。初步探讨女性生殖道感染最常见的HPV基因型。方法从2004年6月—2005年5月在中日友好医院妇科行宫颈癌筛查的患者7520例中选取591例,包括宫颈细胞学检查正常者138例,异常者453例,并对异常者按组织病理学分为炎症组、宫颈上皮内瘤变（CIN）Ⅰ组、CINⅡ组、CINⅢ组、宫颈癌组和湿疣组。采用HybriMax方法对591名患者进行宫颈细胞21种HPV基因型分型检测,并对其中的413例同时采用第二代杂交捕获（HC-Ⅱ）试验行13种高危型HPV检测。另选取453例细胞学异常者中的101例患者的组织切片进行原位杂交HPV16、18检测。比较不同方法检测结果的一致性,计算用HybriMax法检测的各组患者不同HPV基因型的阳性率。结果HybriMax与HC-Ⅱ两种方法检测13种高危型HPV的总符合率92．5％（382／413）,总Kappa指数（KI）0．814,宫颈癌组符合率100．0％;与原位杂交检测结果符合率89．1％（90／101）,KI为0．776。10种最常见的HPV基因型依次（按阳性率递减）为：细胞学正常者16、68、18、52、58、11、53、31、39、33;细胞学异常者16、52、58、18、33、31、81、53、68、66,宫颈癌组16、18、52、58、33、66、68、31、51、53。结论HybriMax与HC-Ⅱ、原位杂交检测结果一致性良好,且能对更多基因型确切分型。官颈病变患者最常见的6种HPV基因型为16、18、52、58、33、31。