A blinded in vitro study with Refacto mock plasma samples: similar FVIII results between the chromogenic assay and a one-stage assay when using a higher cephalin dilution.

Assay of factor VIII (FVIII) in patient samples is routinely carried out using the one-stage assay rather than the chromogenic substrate assay. The introduction of new FVIII preparations for the treatment of haemophilia A, including immunopurified FVIII and particularly, recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) concentrates, has led to discrepancies between the results obtained with the two assays. In patients treated with rFVIII concentrates, FVIII levels measured with the one-stage assay can be 20-50% lower than those measured with the chromogenic assay. In this study, the one-stage assay was performed with cephalin dilutions higher than those recommended by the manufacturer. B-domain-deleted recombinant FVIII, Refacto, was diluted to eight different concentrations, ranging from 1-100 IU dL(-1), in FVIII-deficient plasma and the FVIII activity of the eight solutions was determined by the chromogenic method in a central laboratory. Aliquots were then assayed by the one-stage method in the four participating laboratories, using different dilutions of CK-Prest. When CK-Prest was reconstituted according to the manufacturer's recommendations (dilution 1 : 1), the difference between the one-stage and chromogenic methods was close to 30%. CK-Prest cephalin dilutions of 1 : 5 and 1 : 8 gave very similar results with the two methods, without increasing the interlaboratory coefficient of variation. These findings confirm the influence of phospholipids on the one-stage assay, particularly the importance of using a phospholipid concentration close to the physiological value in platelets. This modified one-stage method may therefore offer an alternative to the use of a concentrate-specific standard.     

Diagnostic importance of the two-stage factor VIII:C assay demonstrated by a case of mild haemophilia associated with His1954 → Leu substitution in the factor VIII A3 domain

In some families with mild haemophilia higher results are obtained for factor VIII activity (FVII:C) determined by one-stage assay than by two-stage or chromogenic assays. Amino-acid substitutions in the A1, A2 and A3 domains of factor VIII have been described in affected individuals with this phenotype. We describe a case of mild haemophilia A in which FVIII:C measured by one-stage assay was normal at 106%. However, FVIII:C levels measured by two-stage and chromogenic assays were 18% and 35% respectively. DNA analysis revealed a novel mutation in the A3 domain of factor VIII, His1954-->Leu. In a molecular model of the FVIII A domains, His1954 is placed in close proximity to two other mutations that have previously been shown also to be associated with one-stage/two-stage discrepancies. In this patient the diagnosis of haemophilia A would be missed if only the one-stage assay was used.     

In vitro kinetics of factor VIII activity in patients with mild haemophilia A and a discrepancy between one-stage and two-stage factor VIII assay results

In some mild haemophilia A patients (discrepant haemophilia), factor VIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C) levels, by one-stage assay are more than double than those by two-stage assay. This may be due to the longer incubation times (10-12 min) in the two-stage assay. This study aimed to determine the time course of the activation phase of the two-stage assay, using both classical coagulation and chromogenic detection methods. In both systems, for equivalent patients (equivalent FVIII:C levels by one-stage and two-stage assays, n = 6, all different mutations), similar FVIII:C results were obtained with short- or long-incubation times. In contrast, plasma from discrepant patients (n = 8, five different mutations) showed higher FVIII:C at shorter incubation times than after longer incubation times. In the chromogenic assay, FVIII:C levels were higher after incubation for 2 min (23-56%, mean 41%) than after 10 min (19-41%, mean 29%). In the classical coagulation assay, FVIII:C levels were higher at shorter incubation times (21-64%, mean 37%) than with the longer incubation times usually used (13-29%, mean 23%). These time-course experiments have verified that the longer incubation time used in the two-stage assay is at least partly responsible for the lower FVIII:C measured by that assay in discrepant haemophilia.     

Clinical utility and impact of the use of the chromogenic vs one-stage factor activity assays in haemophilia A and B

Treatment of haemophilia A/B patients comprises factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX) concentrate replacement therapy, respectively. FVIII and FIX activity levels can be measured in clinical laboratories using one-stage activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)-based clotting or two-stage chromogenic factor activity assays. We discuss strengths and limitations of these assays, providing examples of clinical scenarios to highlight some of the challenges associated with their current use for diagnostic and monitoring purposes. Substantial inter-laboratory variability has been reported for one-stage assays when measuring the activity of factor replacement products due to the wide range of currently available aPTT reagents, calibration standards, factor-deficient plasmas, assay conditions and instruments. Chromogenic activity assays may avoid some limitations associated with one-stage assays, but their regulatory status, perceived higher cost, and lack of laboratory expertise may influence their use. Haemophilia management guidelines recommend the differential application of one or both assays for initial diagnosis and disease severity characterisation, post-infusion monitoring and replacement factor potency labelling. Efficient communication between clinical and laboratory staff is crucial to ensure application of the most appropriate assay to each clinical situation, correct interpretation of assay results and, ultimately, accurate diagnosis and optimal and safe treatment of haemophilia A or B patients.     

A modified chromogenic assay for the measurement of very low levels of factor VIII activity (FVIII:C)

A precise and sensitive chromogenic assay for the measurement of very low levels of factor VIII (FVIII) in plasma has been developed. The assay is based on modifications of a commercially available chromogenic assay. The modifications include reduction of sample final dilution factor and prolongation of the development period. The modified assay allows accurate and precise measurement of FVIII in the range of 0.001-0.02 IU mL(-1). The detection limit is 0.0005 IU mL(-1) and the quantitation limit is 0.0015 IU mL(-1). This assay can be used in research and to study the clinical efficacy of low circulating levels of FVIII in haemophilia A patients.     

In vivo recovery with products of very high purity — assay discrepancies

Summary. In view of reports of FVIII assay discrepancies in post-infusion plasma samples depending on methods used, we compared FVIII results run by each of four different methods following infusion of rFVIII (Kogenate®). Nine persons with haemophilia A were infused with each of two lots of product. Plasma samples were obtained at baseline, and at 10 min, 30 min, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 14, 30 and 48 h post-infusion for measurement of FVIII. FVIII assay methods were chromogenic, and one-stage APTT using three different types of activators: micronized, silica, ellagic acid, and kaolin. The same reference plasma standard was used throughout. Results demonstrated a consistent difference in FVIII values, with chromogenic assays being considerably higher than those run by one-stage assays. The discrepancy was greatest when kaolin was the activator. These results point out the problems in attempting to determine the “correct” FVIII level in patient plasma samples following infusion of high purity FVIII preparations. Potential “pitfalls” include the standard used for defining product potency, the methods, reagents, instrumentation and standards used in assaying plasma samples and, in some instances, the characteristics of the product itself. This situation has considerable cost implications, potential impact on patient care, and makes it difficult to compare results between laboratories.     

Clinical application of the chromogenic assay of factor VIII in haemophilia A, and different variants of von Willebrand's disease

A chromogenic substrate kit for determination of factor VIII activity (COATEST Factor VIII) was compared to a one-stage clotting assay and the correlation was evaluated in different genetic variants of mild and moderate haemophilia A, in severe haemophilia A and in all known variants of von Willebrand's disease. In all these cases a high correlation between the two methods was obtained. A good correlation was also obtained after intranasal administration of DDAVP (1-desamino-8-D-arginine vasopressin) to patients with von Willebrand's disease. The chromogenic substrate method was performed using a microtray technique.     

Assay discrepancy in mild haemophilia A: entire population study in a National Haemophilia Centre

Summary.  Assay discrepancy in mild haemophilia, here defined by a significantly higher factor VIII (FVIII):C response by the one-stage procoagulant assay as compared with a two-stage enzymatic method, has repeatedly been reported in literature. The purpose of this study was to determine the overall prevalence of this phenomenon amongst mild haemophilia families from a population of 2.95 million inhabitants in the Western Danish region. Information was collected retrospectively through a thorough search of archives of the National Haemophilia Centre in Aarhus. We identified 109 patients with mild haemophilia A amongst whom 92 were eligible to enter the study. These represent a total of 53 unrelated families. Our data illustrate that this assay discrepancy pattern is found quite frequently amongst our mild haemophilia A families. While the ratio of FVIII:C chromogenic/FVIII:C clot values was quite consistent amongst patients belonging to same family pattern, ratios in the entire cohort of families ranged from 0.18 to 1.00. Selecting a cut-off level for the FVIII:C chromogenic/FVIII:C clot ratios at 0.7, 0.6 and 0.5, respectively, we found that 38 (72%), 27 (51%) and 19 (36%) of families, respectively, displayed this assay discrepancy. In 10 patients, the FVIII:C chromogenic level was inside the category of moderate haemophilia at >0.01–<0.05 IU mL⁻¹, pointing to a class-shift in the biochemical phenotype. In conclusion, our data illustrate a substantial prevalence of the assay discrepancy phenomenon amongst mild haemophilia A patients in our geographical area.     

Thrombin generation in haemophilia A patients with mutations causing factor VIII assay discrepancy

Summary. Up to 40% of patients with mild haemophilia A have a discrepancy whereby factor VIII (FVIII) measurements by a two‐stage chromogenic assay (FVIII:C_CH) are disproportionately reduced compared with the FVIII one‐stage clotting value (FVIII:C). Which assay best reflects the coagulation potential and clinical phenotype in this patient group is of clinical significance, yet remains unclear. We have assessed the global coagulant ability of haemophilia patients with FVIII assay discrepancy using calibrated automated thrombography (CAT). A total of 18 patients with mutations Arg531His/Cys or Arg698Trp causing FVIII discrepancy were investigated, together with 12 haemophilia patients with concordant FVIII values and 15 normal controls. Factor VIII levels in all patients and controls were measured using both one‐stage clotting assay and two‐stage chromogenic assay. Thrombin generation was assessed in platelet‐poor plasma by CAT using a low tissue factor concentration (1 pm ). FVIII:C_CH values were below normal in all patients, and in the discrepant group were between 1.5‐ and 8‐fold lower than FVIII:C values. CAT parameters were affected in all haemophilia patients. The endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) was reduced to 58–67% of the mean normal value (1301 nm min^?1), whereas peak thrombin was further reduced to 27–30% of the mean normal value (178 nm ) in both discrepant and concordant patient groups. Analysis of the discrepant patient group showed the most significant correlation between the one‐stage FVIII:C assay and ETP (r² = 0.44) and peak thrombin parameters (r² = 0.27).     

Familial discrepancy between the one-stage and two-stage factor VIII methods in a subgroup of patients with haemophilia A

A higher result for plasma factor VIII:C measured by the one-stage as compared with the twostage method has been described in some patients with haemophilia A or with von Willebrand's disorder. We used both methods to measure FVIII:C in 95 patients with haemophilia A. The results were equivalent in all 21 patients with severe haemophilia (16 families) and in 45 of the patients with mild or moderate haemophilia (18 families). However, the results were discrepant (FVIII: C by one-stage assay 2-7-fold higher than by two-stage assay) in the other 29 patients with mild or moderate haemophilia (12 other families). For each patient with discrepant FVIII: C results the classification was the same for all other affected members of his family. In some families with haemophilia A the gene defect leads to a discrepancy between the one-stage and twostage FVIII: C results and may be more widespread than previously recognized.     

New quantitative aPTT waveform analysis and its application in laboratory management of haemophilia A patients

Diagnosis of haemophilia A is usually made by the measurement of factor VIII (FVIII) activity that allows categorization of the disease severity. However, tests that assess global haemostasis may better reflect clinical features and give additional clinically relevant information. The aim of this study was to develop a new quantitative activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) waveform analysis and compare it with FVIII activities to find out whether waveform parameters are superior determinants of clinical phenotype. A total of 81 haemophilia A patients divided into two groups (37 severe, 44 non‐severe) were included in the study. The control group comprised 101 healthy male volunteers. Quantitative aPTT waveform analysis was performed with Actin FS on BCS (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Marburg, Germany) using three parameters (DELTA, RATIO‐1, RATIO‐2) obtained from a single aPTT measurement with two evaluation modes. FVIII activities were measured by one‐stage clotting and two‐stage chromogenic assay. Statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) between control group and all haemophilia A patients, as well as between severe and non‐severe haemophilia A patients was obtained for all quantitative waveform parameters. Our study revealed parameter DELTA as the best waveform parameter, showing significant correlation with FVIII activities and clinical parameters, and excellent performance for distinguishing between severe and non‐severe haemophilia A patients (ROC analysis: sensitivity 97.3%, specificity 93.2%). The results obtained by new quantitative aPTT waveform analysis were superior to those obtained by standard laboratory methods. The simplicity and cost‐benefit of the method make this approach a reasonable and promising tool for assessing coagulation in haemophilia A patients.     

Platelet-dependent coagulation assays for factor VIII efficacy measurement after substitution therapy in patients with haemophilia A

FVIII therapy for haemophilia A is safe and effective, with the problem of individually sufficient efficacy unsettled. Routine one-stage clotting assays and tests employing chromogenic substrates poorly detect individual haemostatic effects of FVIII due to artificial test conditions. In particular, the use of cell-free and diluted plasma samples neglect the crucial role of platelets for thrombin and fibrin formation. To optimize FVIII substitution therapy, we measured in 40 patients with severe to mild haemophilia A before and after FVIII substitution the FVIII activity in cell-free plasma samples using a one-stage clotting assay as well a chromogenic substrate assay and compared the data with those obtained with cell-based coagulation tests, i.e. thrombin generation in platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and thromboelastography (TEG) in samples of citrated whole blood (WB). To determine the maximum ex vivo haemostatic effect we added 1 unit/ml of FVIII to samples of PRP and WB and measured the maximum thrombin generation in the thrombin generation test (TGT) and the maximum clot firmness (MCF) in TEG. After FVIII substitution we observed a nearly linear relation between the individual FVIII activities administered to the patients and the activities measured in the plasma samples. However, data obtained with TGT and TEG revealed a high inter-individual variation and a very poor correlation to the administered FVIII activity. Actually, it could be shown that FVIII substitution yielding in a FVIII plasma activity of about 30% is sufficient to get an ex vivo haemostatic effect of more that 90% as measured by maximum thrombin generation and MCF. FVIII substitution up to a plasma activity of more than 90% did not further enhance the haemostatic effect. Our data clearly demonstrate that the haemostatic effect of FVIII is not only dependent on the activity that is measured in plasma but also depends on the interplay between coagulation and blood cells, in particular with platelets. The use of cell-based coagulation tests such us TGT or TEG may help to optimize FVIII therapy by determining the individual FVIII dosage that produces a maximum haemostatic effect.     

Role of chromogenic assays in haemophilia A and B diagnosis

The laboratory diagnosis and monitoring of factors VIII and IX have been primarily by one‐stage clotting assay (OSA) for many years. Chromogenic assays (CSA) have been available only in specialist laboratories and not for routine use. Significant differences, of more than 1.5‐fold in results between the 2 assay methods, have been described in Europe and Australia in approximately one‐third of patients with mild haemophilia A. In certain discrepant groups with restricted F8 gene mutations, the OSA results are more than 1.5‐fold higher than CSA and risk a missed or misleading diagnostic result. More recently, an assay discrepancy in haemophilia B has been reported. With the introduction of extended half‐life (EHL) FVIII and FIX products, it is likely most coagulation laboratories will need to evaluate at least one CSA and gain experience with this technique. The validation of CSA involves a careful appraisal of calibration curve linearity, limit of detection, precision, reference range, quality control material, sample analysis, method comparison and cost. This review will discuss the current status of FVIII and FIX CSA for the diagnosis of haemophilia A and B and describe approaches to implement CSA into the laboratory repertoire.     

Evaluation of three automated chromogenic FVIII kits for the diagnosis of mild discrepant haemophilia A

In some mild haemophilia A patients (discrepant phenotype), coagulation FVIII levels by one-stage assay (FVIII-1st) are more than double those by classical two-stage coagulation assay (FVIII-2st), and may fall within the normal range. Our aim was to assess automated two-stage chromogenic FVIII assays (FVIII-chr) for diagnosis of mild discrepant haemophilia A. Three chromogenic FVIII kits (Biophen, Coamatic and Dade-Behring) were evaluated, using recommended and extended incubation times. Samples were tested from patients with discrepant haemophilia (n = 7) and equivalent mild haemophilia (agreement between FVIII-1st and FVIII-2st, n = 4). For equivalent haemophilia, FVIII-chr were consistent with FVIII-1st and FVIII-2st for all kits at all incubation times. For discrepant haemophilia, using recommended incubation times, mean FVIII-chr using Biophen reagents was 22 IU/dl (range 13-31), with Coamatic 26 (17-34) and with Dade-Behring 41 (33-47), compared with 36 (27-44) for FVIII-1st and 8 (6-9) for FVIII-2st. FVIII-chr decreased as incubation time was increased with Biophen and Coamatic, but decreased less with Dade-Behring. FVIII-chr using the Dade-Behring kit gave similar results to FVIII-1st and is not suitable for diagnosis of mild discrepant haemophilia A. FVIII-chr by Biophen and Coamatic kits is suitable for diagnosis of these patients, especially with an extended incubation time.     

Current laboratory practices in the diagnosis and management of haemophilia: a global assessment

Haemophilia management is complicated by the extreme variability in laboratory practices. Lack of consistency or comparability in testing makes it difficult to establish diagnostic criteria or disease severity, and complicates response assessment. A global survey was conducted to document current practices. A 35‐min survey was completed by 30 laboratory scientists in each of seven countries (France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain, UK, USA; 210 in total); results were weighted by average country testing volume in haemophilia. Eighty‐three per cent of participants reported participation in a Quality Assurance scheme. Ninety per cent reported using clotting tests in haemophilia A and 88% in haemophilia B (55% and 53% frequent use respectively). Sixty‐eight per cent reported chromogenic assays were used in haemophilia A, with only 23% reporting frequent use, compared to only 11% reporting any use in haemophilia B. Twenty‐nine separate activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) reagents were reported for haemophilia A and 27 aPTT reagents were reported for haemophilia B, with one‐quarter or less obtaining reagents or kits from any single manufacturer. Fifty‐four per cent run a calibration curve with every factor VIII (FVIII) assay. The mean number of plasma dilutions varied from 2 to 4 for FVIII assays and from 1 to 3 for FIX assays. Results indicate very low consistency in materials and practices used to test for factor activity in haemophilia. A number of responses suggest that some laboratory scientists' understanding of best practices or guidelines in haemophilia could be improved. More education and broader understanding is recommended regarding assay types, assay components, test material and instrument features and capabilities.     

Pharmacokinetics of factor VIII and factor IX

Summary.  A survey of principal pharmacokinetic (PK) studies on factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX (FIX) plasma- and rDNA-derived concentrates, analysed by means of the PKRD program, has been performed. Notwithstanding the accurate definition of the study design, released in 1991 by the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (SSC-ISTH), a large variability of PK parameters has been pointed out. In the majority of the PK studies, the size of the population is small. In this situation, a careful individualization of haemophilia therapy is strongly recommended. The tailored prediction of loading and maintenance dosages and the need for strict control of trough FVIII/IX levels are mandatory not only to decrease the risk of bleeds but also to spare financial resources. Recently, the old problem of FVIII assay standardization has again become a concern among physicians, especially after the introduction of B-domain deleted rFVIII concentrate. The discrepancies between the widely used one-stage clotting assay and the chromogenic substrate assay seem to be solved by the introduction of a product-specific laboratory standard.     

Diagnosis of factor VIII deficiency

Summary.  The correct diagnosis of factor VIII deficiency and the assessment of severity of the disease are essential for a patient-tailored treatment strategy. An optimal diagnostic procedure comprises sensitive and specific screening methods and factor VIII activity assays. Different screening reagents show variable characteristics and receiver operator characteristic curves are presented showing the relation between sensitivity and specificity of eleven activated partial thromboplastin time reagents. The details of the three methods for factor VIII activity assay, one-stage and two-stage assay and chromogenic assays, are discussed. The chromogenic assay seems to be more sensitive than the one-stage assay with regard to the detection of severe haemophilia. Discrepant results obtained with one-stage and two-stage assays are reviewed and discussed.     

Performance of recalibrated ReFacto® laboratory standard in the measurement of FVIII plasma concentration via the chromogenic and one-stage assays after infusion of recalibrated ReFacto® (B-domain deleted recombinant factor VIII)

Summary.  The use of ReFacto Laboratory Standard ( RLS ) in the one-stage clotting assay was proposed to reduce the underestimation of factor VIII (FVIII) plasma concentration after the infusion of 'ReFacto^®' (B-domain deleted recombinant FVIII) in haemophilia A patients. Both ReFacto^® and RLS were recently recalibrated, with the resulting materials containing approximately 20% more protein than the previous products. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of recalibrated RLS in the measurement of FVIII plasma concentration after the infusion of recalibrated ReFacto^®. In 13 severe haemophilia A patients, 25 IU kg⁻¹ of ReFacto ^® were injected intravenously. Venous blood samples were collected at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 9, 24, 28 and 32 h after the end of the infusion. Pharmacokinetic parameters were measured for the chromogenic and one-stage assays using International Plasma Standard (IPS) and RLS for both assays and assuming a non-compartmental drug disposition. Comparisons among assays and standards were performed using anova . Pharmacokinetic estimates obtained with the chromogenic method were in agreement with those published in the literature. The one-stage method was confirmed to be more sensitive to lower plasma concentrations of FVIII. The measured maximum plasma concentration ( C _max ) was slightly higher than theoretical values and independent of the assay used. C _max , area under the curve ( AUC) and volume of distribution at steady state ( V _ss ) presented non-significant differences among the methods and standards used. The clinical utility of RLS in the evaluation of FVIII concentration after the infusion of ReFacto^® seems to be reduced since recalibration of the product.     

Evaluation of an automated screening assay for von Willebrand disease type 2N

Evaluating the factor VIII (FVIII) binding activity of von Willebrand factor (VWF) is an important step in the diagnostic work-up of families affected by apparent mild haemophilia A. In von Willebrand's disease (VWD) type 2N (Normandy), mutations at the N-terminal end of the mature VWF subunit gene prevent the binding of FVIII. Individuals heterozygous for type 2N VWD are generally asymptomatic. Homozygotes and compound heterozygotes present with a clinical picture which mimics haemophilia A, with a markedly reduced FVIII : C activity and VWF within the normal range, but instead of exhibiting X-linked inheritance they show an autosomal recessive inheritance pattern. The distinction between haemophilia A and VWD type 2N has important implications for therapy and genetic counselling. We present a highly specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay screening method for the Normandy variant, which measures VWF : FVIII binding activity in parallel with VWF antigen, using monoclonal capture and detection antibodies. The assay is fully automated using a robotic microtitre plate processor, requiring minimal user intervention and providing the capacity to screen large numbers of patients.     

Normalization of factor VIII levels in a patient with mild haemophilia A during a 35-year period

We report the case of a 45-year-old man who was diagnosed in June 1969 9 years old as having mild haemophilia A following a traumatic left shoulder bleed when his factor VIII (FVIII) activity was 11 IU dL(-1) based on a two-stage assay. The bleed resolved following treatment with intravenous cryoprecipitate. There was no family history of haemophilia. Cryoprecipitate infusions were required to treat further traumatic bleeds between 1971 and 1981. During this time, his FVIII activity was confirmed at 14 IU dL(-1). He defaulted many hospital appointments until 1991 when his FVIII activity had risen to 42 IU dL(-1). There was no evidence of infection, inflammatory or liver disease to account for this change. By 2005 he had a normal FVIII activity of 62 IU dL(-1) based on a one-stage assay. FVIII gene analysis confirmed a codon 531 mutation. It appeared that the discrepant FVIII results related to whether a two-stage or one-stage assay was used that has been previously reported for other patients with these mutations. We felt it important to raise awareness that this phenomenon may lead to apparent correction of haemophilia A.