Production and characterization of human monoclonal anti-idiotype antibodies to anti-dsDNA antibodies

Anti-dsDNA autoantibodies are the hallmark of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and frequently correlate with disease activity. In this study we report the isolation and characterization of human anti-Id monoclonal antibody fragments as single-chain Fv fragments (scFv) against anti-dsDNA antibody. The anti-Id monoclonal antibodies, specific for anti-dsDNA antibodies, have been cloned from phage display antibody scFv libraries derived from a patient with SLE. The V gene repertoires were derived from the RNA obtained from the B cells of an SLE patient with anti-Ro/SSA and anti-La/SSB antibodies. Affinity-purified anti-dsDNA antibodies were used for selection of bacterial clones producing specific scFv antibody fragments against anti-dsDNA antibodies and little reactivity with normal IgG and other IgG antibodies by ELISA. The anti-Id antibody recognizes a public idiotope that is broadly cross-reactive with polyclonal and monoclonal anti-dsDNA antibodies. This binding was largely inhibited by dsDNA antigen. The anti-Id antibody inhibited anti-dsDNA binding to dsDNA antigen in immunoassays and in the Crithidia luciliae assay. The anti-Id scFv antibody fragments derived from human genes could modulate the pathogenicity of anti-dsDNA autoantibodies and may have therapeutic implications in SLE. They may also be used as probes in studies of the structure of the idiotype.     

Anti-dsDNA and Sm autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus

Summary During the present study the coincidence of anti-dsDNA and Sm antibodies was detected in 16 percent of 51 consecutive SLE patients. These antibodies were detected by the standard indirect immunofluorescence and Ouchterlony tests. All patients with anti-dsDNA and Sm antibodies showed disease activity, including renal, CNS and pulmonary disease. We excluded a cross reactivity of these antibodies by ELISA, using competitive experiments with dsDNA and Sm antigens. The results support the presence of multiple autoantibody production during SLE activity, and suggest that different mechanisms may underlie the induction and regulation of both autoantibodies.     

Cross-reactivity of antiidiotypic antibodies with DNA in systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVE: To assess the functional relationship between antibodies reactive with DNA and antibodies reactive with the idiotypes (idiopeptides) of anti-DNA antibodies that are associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in mice. METHODS: Antiidiotypic antibodies that appeared spontaneously in lupus mice, and others that were induced by immunization of normal, non-lupus mice, were analyzed for their reactivity by a range of direct binding, competition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) methods. Their reactions were assessed against synthetic peptides representing sequences of the V(H) region of anti-DNA monoclonal antibody (mAb) V-88, against the native mAb itself, and against mammalian DNA. RESULTS: In lupus mice, only sera with the highest reactivity against double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) also reacted with idiopeptides in ELISA, and this showed a strong statistical correlation. However, there was no significant relationship between antiidiotypic antibodies and anti-single-stranded DNA antibodies. Immunization of (BALB/c x NZW)F1 mice with idiopeptides p64 (V(H) residues 64-80) or p92 (V(H) residues 92-105) induced antibodies that reacted not only against the respective peptides, but also against the native parent anti-DNA mAb V-88. Furthermore, the immune antiidiopeptide antibodies cross-reacted with dsDNA. Competition SPR experiments with the BIAcore system supported this observation. The binding reaction of V(H) peptide p64 (representing the CDR-H2/FR-H3 region of V-88) with antiidiopeptide antibodies was inhibited by dsDNA. CONCLUSION: This study identified a unique set of autoantibodies in SLE. They react with both autoantibody idiotopes and with dsDNA, thus having a dual specificity for 2 autoantigens. Because these antiidiotope antibodies arise naturally during the development of lupus disease, and because they bind also to dsDNA, this provides a mechanism whereby the production of anti-dsDNA antibodies is stimulated. These idiotopes on autoantibodies in lupus act as natural mimotopes for inducing anti-dsDNA antibodies, which, due to their dual specificity, may significantly contribute to the pathology of nephritis in SLE.     

Presence of nucleosome-restricted antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Objective. To assess whether nucleosome-restricted antibodies, i.e., antibodies that react with the whole nucleosome particle but not with its individual components (double-stranded DNA [dsDNA] and his-tones), are present in the sera of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods. Antibodies were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using purified nucleo-somes, dsDNA, or histones. These tests were applied to the sera of 40 patients with SLE. Protein G–purified IgGs of representative sera were sequentially adsorbed on dsDNA-and histone-conjugated solid-phase supports and further assayed for their nucleosome, dsDNA, and histone reactivities. Results. Of the 40 sera tested, 16 displayed anti-dsDNA and/or antihistone antibody activity, which was always associated with significant antinucleosome reactivity. In addition, 3 sera showed antinucleosome activity that was not associated with concomitant anti-dsDNA or antihistone activity. The presence of true nucleosome-restricted antibodies was demonstrated, after solid-phase adsorption, in representative SLE sera that showed anti-dsDNA or antihistone antibody activity, and also in sera that did not show these activities. Conclusion. Our results provide evidence for the presence of nucleosome-restricted antibodies in patients with lupus. These nucleosome-restricted antibodies, along with anti-dsDNA and antihistone antibodies, appear to belong to a broad set of antinuclear antibodies, the antinucleosome family.     

Circulating anti-double-stranded DNA antibody-secreting cells in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a novel biomarker for disease activity

Antibodies against double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) are widely used to diagnose systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and evaluate its activity in patients. This study was undertaken to examine the clinical utility of circulating anti-dsDNA antibody-secreting cells for evaluating SLE patients. Anti-dsDNA antibody-secreting cells quantified using an enzyme-linked immunospot assay were detected in the spleen, bone marrow and peripheral blood from MRL/lpr but not in control BALB/c mice. Circulating anti-dsDNA antibody-secreting cells were detected in 29 (22%) of 130 patients with SLE, but in none of 49 with non-SLE connective-tissue disease or 18 healthy controls. The presence of circulating anti-dsDNA antibody-secreting cells was associated with persistent proteinuria, high SLE disease activity index and systemic lupus activity measures, and a high serum anti-dsDNA antibody titre measured with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The positive predictive value for active disease was 48% for circulating anti-dsDNA antibody-secreting cells versus 17% for serum anti-dsDNA antibodies. A prospective cohort of patients with circulating anti-dsDNA antibodies and inactive SLE showed that the cumulative disease flare-free rate was significantly lower in patients with than without circulating anti-dsDNA antibody-secreting cells (p?相似文献   

Anti-nucleosome antibody: significance in lupus patients lacking anti-double-stranded DNA antibody

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical significance of anti-nucleosome antibodies in SLE patients lacking anti-double stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibodies. METHODS: IgG anti-nucleosome antibodies were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) in the sera of SLE patients. Anti-dsDNA antibodies were measured by Farr assays and ELISA, not only in the samples taken for anti-nucleosome testing, but also in sera obtained regularly during the follow-up. RESULTS: Ninety-eight (76.0%) out of 129 patients with SLE had anti-nucleosome antibodies. Twenty-five patients (19.4%) consistently showed little or no anti-dsDNA reactivity during the course of their disease, and among these anti-nucleosome antibodies were present in the sera of 15 (60.0%). Of the patients with anti-dsDNA-negative SLE, renal disorders were present in 8 patients (32.0%), all of whom had anti-nucleosome antibodies. Renal disorders were not found in patients (n = 10) who had neither anti-dsDNA nor anti-nucleosome antibodies. Other autoantibodies such as anti-Ro, anti-Sm and anti-cardiolipin were not associated with renal disorders in this group. The levels of anti-nucleosome antibody strongly correlated with the SLEDAI scores, but inversely correlated with serum complement levels in anti-dsDNA negative SLE patients. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the anti-nucleosome antibody may be a useful marker for diagnosis and activity assessment of anti-dsDNA negative SLE. Anti-nucleosome antibody may be an important factor for renal involvement in this subgroup of patients.     

Critical comparative analyses of anti-alpha-actinin and glomerulus-bound antibodies in human and murine lupus nephritis

OBJECTIVE: Although anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibodies are important in lupus nephritis, the question regarding which glomerular structures (alpha-actinin, nucleosomes, or others) are recognized by nephritogenic anti-dsDNA antibodies is still controversial. In this study, we determined which glomerular structures are recognized by monoclonal and in vivo-bound nephritogenic antibodies. METHODS: Western blotting was used to analyze the ability of nephritogenic anti-dsDNA antibodies to recognize glomerular and nucleosomal structures. Sera from patients with lupus nephritis, sera from random antinuclear antibody-positive patients, and paired antibodies from sera and kidney eluates from nephritic (NZB x NZW)F(1) mice were analyzed for activity against proteins identified by monoclonal nephritogenic antibodies, and against alpha-actinin, dsDNA, nucleosomes, histone H1, heparan sulfate, DNase I, and type IV collagen. Immunoelectron microscopy was used to determine the glomerular localization of alpha-actinin and in vivo-bound autoantibodies in nephritic (NZB x NZW)F1 mouse kidneys. RESULTS: Anti-alpha-actinin antibodies were observed in human and murine lupus nephritis sera and in sera from patients without systemic lupus erythematosus and were not detected in kidney eluates from nephritic mice. Antibodies to dsDNA and histone H1 were detected in all eluates. Western blot analyses revealed that nephritogenic anti-dsDNA antibodies recognized a 32-kd band, identified as histone H1. Competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay demonstrated that nephritogenic monoclonal antibodies, and dominant antibodies eluted from nephritic kidneys, cross-reacted with dsDNA and H1. This cross-reactive anti-H1 specificity was largely absent in sera from those mice. Immunoelectron microscopic analysis of nephritic (NZB x NZW)F1 mouse kidneys revealed that antibodies eluted from kidneys, but not anti-alpha-actinin antibodies, bound to distinct nephritis-associated electron-dense structures linked to glomerular basement membranes. CONCLUSION: Cross-reactive anti-dsDNA/anti-histone H1 antibodies, but not anti-alpha-actinin antibodies, are central among those deposited in nephritic glomeruli.     

Evidence for direct anti-heparin-sulphate reactivity in sera of SLE patients

Recently it has been suggested that anti-dsDNA antibodies (Abs) promote tissue damage in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) by cross-reactivity with highly negatively charged tissue components such as heparan sulphate (HS), the major glycosaminoglycan of the glomerular basement membrane (GBM). Other authors, however, support the theory of DNA-anti-dsDNA immune complex deposition in situ. To further elucidate the possible role of HS antibodies, we developed a new ELISA system with heparan sulphate bound to solid phase. SLE patients (n=40) showed a higher reactivity against HS (mean=28.4, SD=34.3) as compared to normal donors (n=28, mean=15.2, SD=6.3) and patients with rheumatoid arthritis (n=35, mean=14.3, SD=6.4). The addition of native dsDNA or HS to SLE sera was followed by a dose-dependent reduction in anti-HS reactivity. In contrast, in an anti-dsDNA ELISA, no reduction was observed when HS was added to SLE sera. An increase in reactivity was observed when SLE sera with and without a prior incubation with dsDNA were digested with DNAse I or II. After the purification of serum samples by protein A sepharose under dissociative conditions, seven out of eight SLE patients showed an increase in anti-HS reactivity. No correlation of the anti-HS Abs was found with organ involvement or other serological parameters. We concluded, that there is evidence for a direct anti-HS Ab reactivity in SLE sera. A part of these antibodies seems to show low avidity anti-dsDNA cross-reactivity.     

Association of IgA anti-dsDNA antibodies with vasculitis and disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus

Previously it has been suggested that the presence of antibodies against dsDNA of the IgA class may define a subset of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients suffering from nephritis and arthritis. Therefore, these autoantibodies were measured in sera of 352 patients with SLE, 81 blood donors, and 189 patients with rheumatoid arthritis using a new ELISA based on human recombinant dsDNA as antigen. IgA anti-dsDNA antibodies were found in 19.9% of the sera from patients with SLE, but in none of the sera from 81 normal controls and 189 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The association of these autoantibodies with 31 clinical and 36 laboratory parameters was calculated. IgA anti-dsDNA antibodies were found to be associated with parameters of disease activity such as elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate and consumption of complement component C3, and the clinical parameters vasculitis, acral necrosis and erythema, but not with nephritis and arthritis. Therefore, IgA anti-dsDNA antibodies define a subset of SLE patients, and monitoring of IgA anti-dsDNA antibodies may be helpful as a prognostic parameter in patients with SLE. Received: 12 April 1998 / Accepted: 24 April 1998     

Anti-chromatin and anti-C1q antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus compared to other systemic autoimmune diseases

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence, sensitivity, and specificity of anti-chromatin and anti-C1q antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis compared to small vessel vasculitis and other connective tissue diseases. To provide long-term follow-up data for anti-chromatin antibodies in lupus nephritis. METHODS: We determined the significance of anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA), anti- double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA), anti-chromatin, and anti-C1q antibodies, as well as complement factors C3 and C4, in relation to disease activity in SLE patients with (n = 47; long-term follow-up data for 33 patients) and without (n = 31) biopsy-confirmed lupus nephritis, microscopic polyangiitis (n = 37), Wegener's granulomatosis (n = 66), primary Sj?gren's syndrome (n = 17), limited scleroderma (CREST syndrome) (n = 6), and progressive systemic scleroderma (PSS) (n = 11). RESULTS: Anti-chromatin antibodies were more specific and sensitive than anti-C1q antibodies in distinguishing SLE patients from those with other systemic autoimmune diseases [anti-chromatin: sensitivity 64.1%, specificity 99.2%, odds ratio (OR) 219.6; anti-C1q: sensitivity 50%, specificity 72.6%, OR 2.65]. Anti-C1q antibodies were present in 75% of patients with Sj?gren's syndrome and 35.1% of patients with microscopic polyangiitis. Anti-chromatin antibodies could identify SLE in patients with positive ANA but negative anti-dsDNA antibodies. Persisting anti-chromatin antibodies indicated SLE disease activity, even if anti-dsDNA antibodies had become negative. In long-term follow-up, those SLE patients with negative anti-dsDNA antibodies but persisting ANA and anti-chromatin antibodies relapsed if immunosuppression had been tapered. Anti-chromatin antibodies correlated with the SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI) as a marker of disease activity. CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of anti-chromatin, but not anti-C1q, antibodies in patients with systemic autoimmune diseases increases diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for SLE and assists in treatment decisions in anti-dsDNA-negative patients.     

Antihistone and anti-double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid antibodies are associated with renal disease in systemic lupus erythematosus

PURPOSE: We sought to assess the nephritogenic antibody profile of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and to determine which antibodies were most useful in identifying patients at risk of nephritis. METHODS: We studied 199 patients with SLE, 78 of whom had lupus nephritis. We assayed serum samples for antibodies against chromatin components (double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid [dsDNA], nucleosome, and histone), C1q, basement membrane components (laminin, fibronectin, and type IV collagen), ribonucleoprotein, and phospholipids. Correlations of these antibodies with disease activity (SLE Disease Activity Index) and nephropathy were assessed. Patients with no initial evidence of nephropathy were followed prospectively for 6 years. RESULTS: Antibodies against dsDNA, nucleosomes, histone, C1q, and basement membrane components were associated with disease activity (P <0.05). In a multivariate analysis, anti-dsDNA antibodies (odds ratio [OR] = 6; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2 to 24) and antihistone antibodies (OR = 9.4; 95% CI: 4 to 26) were associated with the presence of proliferative glomerulonephritis. In the prospective study, 7 (6%) of the 121 patients developed proliferative lupus glomerulonephritis after a mean of 6 years of follow-up. Patients with initial antihistone (26% [5/19] vs. 2% [2/95], P = 0.0004) and anti-dsDNA reactivity (6% [2/33] vs. 0% [0/67], P = 0.048) had a greater risk of developing proliferative glomerulonephritis than patients without these autoantibodies. CONCLUSION: In addition to routine anti-dsDNA antibody assay, antihistone antibody measurement may be useful for identifying patients at increased risk of proliferative glomerulonephritis.     

Studies of human polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies binding to lupus autoantigens and cross-reactive antigens

BACKGROUND: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune rheumatic disease serologically characterized by production of a variety of autoantibodies. Antibodies to double-stranded (ds) DNA are considered to be a diagnostic marker in SLE and their presence often correlates with active disease. The murine R4A anti-dsDNA antibody was found to cross-react with a peptide, D/EWD/EYS/G (R4A peptide), identified by analysing decapeptides selected from a peptide library. The R4A peptide inhibited binding of antibody to dsDNA and antibody deposition in kidneys in vivo. In other previous work, mice immunized with the peptide in a decapeptide form bound to a polylysine backbone, multiple antigenic peptide, were found to develop both anti-DNA and anticardiolipin antibodies. METHODS: To determine if human anti-DNA antibodies bind R4A peptide, we investigated the binding of monoclonal and polyclonal anti-dsDNA and anticardiolipin antibodies to the R4A peptide from patients with SLE. RESULTS: DNA binding by four immunoglobulin (Ig) G and two IgM human monoclonal anti-DNA antibodies was inhibited by the R4A peptide. While monomeric peptide was unable to inhibit affinity-purified polyclonal anti-DNA antibodies, serum anti-DNA reactivity was inhibited by an octameric form of the peptide in 10 SLE patients. CONCLUSIONS: Human anti-DNA reactivity includes the same fine specificity as that present in murine anti-DNA reactivity. Peptide binding might be a useful surrogate marker for SLE.     

Anti-nucleosome antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus of recent onset. Potential utility as a diagnostic tool and disease activity marker

OBJECTIVE: To compare the utility of anti-chromatin antibodies for the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and as markers of disease activity. METHODS: We included 73 consecutive patients (62 female) with SLE (four or more ACR criteria) of recent onset (<1 yr since diagnosis). As control groups we included 130 healthy blood donors and 261 patients with 11 systemic autoimmune diseases (SAD). Disease activity was assessed using the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI). A venous blood sample was drawn to measure three anti-chromatin antibodies [anti-nucleosome (anti-NCS), anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) and anti-histones (anti-HST)] by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: The prevalence of anti-chromatin antibodies in SLE patients and healthy controls was 100 and 3% respectively for anti-NCS, 63 and 5% for anti-dsDNA, and 15 and 3% for anti-HST. Anti-NCS had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 97% for SLE diagnosis. When SLE and SAD patients were compared [excluding mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD)], the sensitivity of anti-NCS, anti-dsDNA and anti-HST antibodies for SLE diagnosis was 93, 71 and 40% respectively and the specificity was 97, 98 and 98%. Anti-chromatin antibodies were not useful in differentiating between SLE and MCTD patients. Anti-NCS antibodies showed the highest correlation with disease activity (r = 0.45, P < 0.0001), especially in patients negative for anti-dsDNA antibodies (r = 0.58, P = 0.001). Anti-NCS antibodies also showed strong association with renal damage (odds ratio 4.1, 95% confidence interval 1.2-13.6, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Anti-NCS antibodies could be a useful tool in the diagnosis and assessment of disease activity in SLE patients, especially in patients who are negative for anti-dsDNA antibodies.     

An analysis of clinical disease activity and nephritis-associated serum autoantibody profiles in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the correlation between lupus nephritis-associated autoantibody levels and the presence/activity of lupus nephritis and global disease activity using cross-sectional data in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: Disease activity was assessed using the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) index. Antibody levels against single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), histones, nucleosomes and heparan sulphate (HS) were analysed by ELISA in SLE patients with (n=11) and without (n=22) nephritis and in normal controls (n=21). Antibody subclasses were also analysed. RESULTS: Higher levels of anti-dsDNA and anti-HS antibodies were found in patients with lupus nephritis, the level of anti-HS antibodies correlating with the BILAG renal score. Predominant subclasses were IgG1 and IgG3 for dsDNA antibodies, IgG2 for anti-nucleosome antibodies, and IgG2 and IgG3 for anti-HS antibodies. CONCLUSION: Correlation was demonstrated between antibodies to dsDNA, ssDNA, histones, nucleosomes and HS. There is a strong correlation between the level of anti-HS antibodies and disease activity in patients with lupus nephritis as measured by BILAG.     

T cell reactivity against the SmD1(83-119) C terminal peptide in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND: The SmD1(83-119) peptide is a major target of the B cell response in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the T cell response directed against this peptide, its disease specificity, and possible impact on SLE pathogenesis. METHODS: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells derived from 28 patients with SLE and 29 healthy and disease controls were stimulated by the SmD1(83-119) and the recombinant (r)SmD1 protein, and [3H]thymidine incorporation was measured. Patients with SLE were simultaneously tested for autoantibodies, disease activity, clinical symptoms, and medical treatments. RESULTS: T cell reactivity against the SmD1(83-119) peptide was detected in 11/28 (39%) patients with SLE and against the rSmD1 protein in 10/28 (36%) patients. In contrast, only 2/29 (7%) controls exhibited SmD1 reactivity. An analysis of proliferation kinetics showed that SmD1 reactive T cells are activated in vivo, as additionally confirmed by cytometric analysis. Addition of mammalian dsDNA to rSmD1 enhanced the rSmD1-specific T cell response. SmD1(83-119)-specific T cell reactivity was significantly more common in patients with cardiac and pulmonary symptoms. No correlation between T and B cell responses and disease activity was seen. CONCLUSION: SmD1(83-119) is a major T cell epitope of SmD1, commonly recognised by T cells from patients with SLE and much less commonly found by healthy or disease controls. This strong T cell reactivity as well as the high frequency and specificity of anti-SmD1(83-119) antibodies in SLE suggest a possible role in SLE pathogenesis, at least in a subset of patients.     

Cellular control of antinuclear antibody production. Anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm plaque forming cells in SLE patients and normal individuals

The in vitro response of lymphocytes to dsDNA, Sm, and Pokeweed Mitogen (PWM) and the role of monocytes in the control of this response were studied in 21 SLE and 14 healthy individuals. Specific hemolytic plaque assays were used to enumerate peripheral blood B lymphocytes secreting anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm antibodies. After 7 days in tissue culture without stimulation, anti-dsDNA or anti-Sm Plaque Forming Cells (PFC) were observed in 75% of SLE patients and 45% of normals. PWM, dsDNA, and Sm stimulation raised the levels of anti-dsDNA PFC in 25%, 37%, and 83% of SLE cultures respectively, and in all but one normal culture. PWM and dsDNA induced a decrease in anti-dsDNA PFC in 50% and 62% of SLE cultures. This suppressive effect was mainly exerted on spontaneous high producers of anti-dsDNA PFC. Monocyte depletion from cultures resulted in a decrease in PFC formation in all normals studied and in 7 SLE cultures. In 2 SLE cultures with no stimulation and one dsDNA stimulated culture, the number of anti-nuclear PFC increased after monocyte depletion. In cocultures of allogeneic, HLA-DR identical mononuclear cells, dsDNA pulsed SLE monocytes appeared more efficient than pulsed normal monocytes in helping to generate anti-dsDNA PFC. SLE lymphocytes responded less well than normals to dsDNA. These results suggest that: nuclear antigens may act as stimulators or suppressor of the specific autoimmune response, depending on the immune status of the SLE patient; and that abnormalities in both monocyte and lymphocyte responses lead to the excessive secretion of anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm antibodies by SLE B lymphocytes.     

Anti-dsDNA antibodies in Brazilian patients of mainly African descent with systemic lupus erythematosus: lack of association with lupus nephritis

Renal disease is associated with morbidity and mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and anti-dsDNA antibodies with SLE immunopathogenesis. We investigated the dsDNA antibody profile of 84 Brazilian SLE patients, 27 with lupus nephritis. Thirty-six (39.1%) patients had dsDNA IgG antibodies shown in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (454.7 ± 281.1 WHO units/mL), nine presenting renal disease. The following profile of dsDNA antibodies was demonstrated in Crithidia luciliae test: IgA (seven out of 36; 19.4%), IgG (22 out of 36, 66.1%); IgM (nine out of 36, 25.0%), and IgE (four out of 36, 11.1%). Two or three isotypes of dsDNA antibodies were observed in nine (25.0%) patients, while 11 (30.5%) were seronegative in the C. luciliae test. Patients with dsDNA antibodies had lower serum C3 and C4 when compared with SLE individuals without these immunoglobulins (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively). There was no association between any dsDNA antibody isotype and lupus kidney disease nor was anti-dsDNA IgM antibody associated with absence of nephritis.     

Association of alpha-actinin-binding anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies with lupus nephritis

OBJECTIVE: Anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibodies may contribute to the pathogenesis of glomerulonephritis (GN) by cross-reacting with alpha-actinin in murine models and in some patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We therefore sought to determine possible disease associations with serologic and clinical features and to characterize this new autoantibody specificity. METHODS: One hundred patients with SLE were recruited into this multicenter study, as well as 100 rheumatic disease controls and 2,100 healthy blood donors. Clinical disease was evaluated by the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI; excluding the anti-DNA component). Anti-dsDNA antibodies were detected by conventional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and by a commercial enzyme immunoassay (EIA). Anti-alpha-actinin antibodies were detected by ELISA, and their specificity was confirmed by Western blotting and by indirect immunofluorescence using rat kidney sections and mesangial cells as substrates. Highly positive sera were selected for absorption experiments and were affinity-purified for cross-reactivity studies and measurement of antibody avidity. RESULTS: Sera from 62 of the SLE patients had anti-dsDNA antibodies; 21 of these sera also had anti-alpha-actinin antibodies, as compared with 1 of the 38 sera without anti-dsDNA antibodies. Of the 22 patients with anti-alpha-actinin antibodies, 10 had GN, as compared with 14 of the 78 without anti-alpha-actinin antibodies (P < 0.01). In patients with GN, anti-alpha-actinin, but not anti-dsDNA, antibodies correlated with the SLEDAI score (minus the anti-DNA component) and with treatment. The fraction of serum anti-dsDNA antibodies that cross-reacted with alpha-actinin exhibited high avidity for dsDNA, as determined using a commercial EIA for high-avidity anti-dsDNA antibodies and an in-house conventional ELISA. CONCLUSION: The alpha-actinin-binding antibodies are significantly associated with GN in SLE. Whether such autoantibodies may anticipate the development of this complication of SLE remains to be verified.     

Anti-DNA antibody synthesis after bone marrow transplantation: implications for IgG subclass restrictivity and pathogenicity of autoantibodies

Two patients developed antinuclear antibodies (ANA) including antibodies directed against double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) after bone marrow transplantation. In one of the patients very high levels of IgM, IgG as well as IgA anti-dsDNA were found during 6 months in the absence of symptoms of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The other patient made IgM anti-dsDNA antibodies for a period of more than 3 years, also in the absence of SLE symptoms. The ANA were restricted to the IgG1 and IgG3 isotypes as is the case in SLE but did not express idiotypes commonly found in this autoimmune disease. The occurrence of these antibodies may reflect a non-antigen induced expansion of the existing donor B-lymphocyte repertoire.