Factor V HR2 haplotype: a risk factor for venous thromboembolism in individuals with absence of Factor V Leiden

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), occurs secondary to a number of hereditary and acquired disorders of hemostasis. A recently recognized polymorphism in Factor V (FV) gene H1299R (also named HR2) has been reported to be a possible risk factor for the development of VTE. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of HR2 polymorphism in VTE in a group of Lebanese patients. Seventy-three VTE patients and 125 healthy subjects were examined for HR2. The average ages for the patients and controls were 45.0 ± 19.1 years and 35.4 ± 18.6 years, respectively. Sixty patients (82.2%) had DVT, eight patients (11%) had PE, and five patients (6.8%) had both. There was significant association between FV Leiden and VTE (p < 0.001). HR2 haplotype had a prevalence of 16.4% in patients. VTE patients with normal FV were 2.7 times more likely to have the HR2 haplotype as compared to controls with normal FV (p = 0.036, 95% CI = 1.04–7.06). We conclude that the FV HR2 haplotype significantly affects the risk of VTE in subjects with normal FV. This finding entails that screening for the HR2 haplotype should be done in VTE patients with normal FV Leiden results. No conflicts of interest. No source of funding.     

The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in heterozygous carriers of factor V Leiden and a first spontaneous venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND: Factor V (FV) Leiden is a risk factor for venous thrombosis (VT). Data on its influence on the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) are controversial owing to different study designs and patient cohorts. METHODS: We reevaluated the risk of recurrence among heterozygous carriers and noncarriers of FV Leiden with a first spontaneous proximal VT of the leg and/or pulmonary embolism. Patients with secondary VTE, homozygous FV Leiden, natural inhibitor deficiencies, lupus anticoagulant, cancer, or long-term anticoagulation were excluded. The study end point was objectively documented, symptomatic, recurrent VTE. RESULTS: After discontinuation of oral anticoagulant therapy for a first VTE, we prospectively observed 287 patients, 83 (29%) of whom were heterozygous for FV Leiden. Recurrent VTE was seen in 17 (20%) of 83 patients with and 44 (21.6%) of 204 without FV Leiden. The probability of recurrence among heterozygotes was 12% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8%-16%), 27% (95% CI, 21%-33%), and 27% (95% CI, 21%-33%) after 2, 4, and 6 years, respectively, and was not higher than that among patients without the mutation (16%, 23%, and 34%, respectively). The relative risk of recurrence in heterozygotes was 0.9 (95% CI, 0.5-1.6; P =.60) after adjustment for confounding variables. The risk of recurrence among patients with and without FV Leiden was not different when sex distribution or duration of anticoagulation therapy was taken into account. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of recurrence is similar among carriers and noncarriers of FV Leiden. Heterozygous patients should receive secondary thromboprophylaxis for a similar length of time as patients without FV Leiden.     

Factor XIII Val34Leu and the risk of venous thromboembolism in factor V Leiden carriers

A mutation in factor XIII (Val34Leu) was reported to protect against venous thromboembolism. We evaluated the effect of Val34Leu on thrombotic risk in 352 factor V Leiden carriers who were first-degree relatives of 132 thrombotic propositi carrying factor V Leiden. The total observation period was 2,594 years in 92 Val34Leu carriers and 7,444 years in 260 non-carriers. The annual incidence of a first episode of venous thromboembolism was 0.31% in Val34Leu carriers and 0.44% in non-carriers [relative risk (RR) for venous thromboembolism: 0.7, 95% CI 0.3-1.5]. Age-specific RR for venous thromboembolism were (for Val34Leu carriers and non-carriers respectively): 1.0 (95% CI 0.3-3.2) in the age group of 15-30 years, 0.4 (95%, CI 0.05-3.0) in the age group of 30-45 years, 0.6 (95% CI 0.1-2.9) in the group aged 45-60 years and 0.5 (95% CI 0.06-4.5) in relatives older than 60 years. In conclusion, the impact of FXIII Val34Leu on the venous thromboembolic risk is modest, suggesting that screening for this mutation in factor V Leiden carriers is not justified.     

The factor V HR2 haplotype and the risk of venous thrombosis: a meta-analysis

Background and Objectives: A complex haplotype of factor V gene (FV HR2) has been recently reported. FVHR2 possesses decreased co-factor activity to APC in the degradation of FVIIIa, and an increased ratio of the more procoagulant isoform FV1 compared to FV2. Contrasting results on whether the haplotype induces a significant risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) have been reported. Design and Methods: It has been surmised that FVHR2 enhances the risk of VTE carried by FV Leiden. We carried out a meta-analysis of the reported studies on the role of HR2 haplotype in inducing a risk of VTE and the influence of the polymorphism on the risk carried by patients with FV Leiden. Results: Eight studies were analyzed for the estimation of the risk of VTE. A total of 338 out of 2,696 cases (12.5%; range 7.8 to 18.5%) and 885 out of 7,710 controls (11.5%; range 8.1 to 12.1%) were HR2 positive. The odds ratio for VTE associated with HR2 haplotype was not statistically significant (OR 1.15; 95% C.I. 0.98-1.36). The OR for the association between FV Leiden and FV HR2 and the risk of VTE in cases and controls was largely heterogeneous as to OR and 95% C.I. and no statistical significant difference was observed. Interpretation and Conclusions: The data from the present meta-analysis suggests that FVHR2 could be a very mild prothrombotic factor. The association of FV Leiden and HR2 haplotype seems not to increase significantly the risk of VTE carried by isolated heterozygosity for FV Leiden. However, well-designed clinical studies are needed to clarify this issue definitely.     

The incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism in carriers of factor V Leiden is related to concomitant thrombophilic disorders

The duration of anticoagulant treatment after a first episode of venous thromboembolism primarily depends on the risk of recurrence. Variability of recurrence rates in factor (F) V Leiden carriers may be due to concomitant thrombophilic disorders. A retrospective study was performed in 329 FV Leiden carriers with a history of venous thromboembolism (262 probands, 67 relatives). The annual rate of first recurrence was estimated in relatives. The contribution of concomitant thrombophilic disorders to the recurrence rate was evaluated in probands and relatives by a nested case--control analysis in 105 matched pairs of carriers either with or without recurrence. The overall annual recurrence rate was 2.3 per 100 patient-years. The adjusted risk of recurrence for concomitant thrombophilic disorders was: 9.1 (1.3-62.8) for the FII mutation; 1.0 (0.2-4.9) for homozygosity for FV Leiden; 1.5 (0.2-9.5) for inherited deficiencies of protein C or S; 1.8 (0.7-4.9) for FVIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C) levels >122%; 5.4 (1.6-18.6) for fasting homocysteine levels >15.2 micromol/l; and 4.4 (1.0-18.7) for loading homocysteine levels >45.8 micromol/l. Of these disorders, only the FII mutation and hyperhomocysteinaemia significantly increased the risk of recurrence in FV Leiden carriers. The estimated recurrence rate ranged from 0.45 per 100 patient--years after a secondary first event in the absence of concomitant disorders to 4.8 per 100 patient-years when a spontaneous first event was combined with concomitant disorders. Our study provides supportive evidence that the incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism in heterozygous FV Leiden carriers depends on the concomitance of other thrombophilic disorders, in addition to whether the first thrombotic event occurred spontaneously.     

Venous thromboembolism after hip fracture surgery in a patient with haemophilia B and factor V Arg506Gln (factor V Leiden).

We describe a patient with mild haemophilia B who developed symptomatic venous thromboembolism after hip arthroplasty for a traumatic fracture. A deep vein thrombosis developed in the operated leg while he was receiving a high-purity factor IX concentrate. Subsequently, he was determined to be a heterozygous carrier for the factor V Arg506Gln (Leiden) mutation. This case illustrates the importance of providing thromboprophylaxis for all patients with haemophilia receiving coagulation factor replacement and who undergo surgical procedures known to be associated with a high risk of venous thromboembolism. In patients with haemophilia and a family history of venous thromboembolism, preoperative screening for the presence of the factor V Arg506Gln mutation and other thrombophilias may be useful.     

Additional genetic risk factors for venous thromboembolismin carriers of the factor V Leiden mutation

Only a minority of subjects with factor V (FV) Leiden mutation develop venous thromboembolism (VTE), suggesting that additional genetic risk factors may be present in symptomatic carriers. We screened 157 unrelated carriers of the FV Leiden mutation with a first episode of VTE and 291 unrelated asymptomatic FV carriers for the presence of two frequent mutations, i.e. G20210A of the prothrombin gene and C677T of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene. Carriers with other inherited or acquired thrombophilia-associated abnormalities were excluded from analysis. Heterozygotes for the G20210A mutation were more prevalent among symptomatic carriers than in asymptomatic carriers (10.8% v 2.7%, P  < 0.0001); homozygotes for the C677T mutation were also more prevalent in symptomatic carriers (21.6% v 14.4%, P  = 0.05). Factor V Leiden carriers who had had a VTE episode during oral contraceptive intake were more frequently carriers of the G20210A mutation (14.3%, P  = 0.03). These results further support the idea that VTE in carriers of FV Leiden results from interaction with additional genetic or circumstantial risk factors, and that an accurate search for such factors is required to identify carriers at risk.     

A prospective study of asymptomatic carriers of the factor V Leiden mutation to determine the incidence of venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND: The factor V Leiden mutation is a common genetic defect associated with an increased risk for venous thromboembolism. The clinical implications for asymptomatic carriers of this mutation and, consequently, the usefulness of screening families in which a proband has both the mutation and venous thromboembolism are unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of venous thromboembolism in asymptomatic carriers of the factor V Leiden mutation. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: University hospitals in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 470 asymptomatic carriers of the factor V Leiden mutation (234 men, 236 women; mean age, 43 years [range, 15 to 88 years]), 12 of whom were homozygous. Carriers were identified by screening the first-degree relatives (>15 years of age) of 247 symptomatic probands. MEASUREMENTS: Objectively diagnosed episodes of venous thromboembolism and the relationship between incidence and exposure to high-risk situations. RESULTS: Nine venous thromboembolic events were observed in 1564 observation-years, resulting in an annual incidence of 0.58% (95% CI, 0.26% to 1.10%). The incidence of spontaneous venous thromboembolism was 0.26% (CI, 0.07% to 0.65%) per year; 3.5% (CI, 0.1% to 17.8%) per episode of surgery, trauma, or immobilization; 0.0% (CI, 0.0% to 19.5%) per pregnancy; 1.8% (CI, 0.4% to 5.2%) per year of oral contraceptive use; and 2.9% (CI, 0.8% to 15.3%) per year of use of hormone replacement therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The absolute annual incidence of spontaneous venous thromboembolism in asymptomatic carriers of the factor V Leiden mutation is low and does not justify routine screening of the families of symptomatic patients.     

Polymorphisms of the tissue factor pathway inhibitor gene are associated with venous thromboembolism in the antiphospholipid syndrome and carriers of factor V Leiden.

Polymorphisms within the tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) gene may determine TFPI expression and increase the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in predisposed individuals. We tested this hypothesis by comparing TFPI activity and the frequency of common TFPI polymorphisms, -33T->C, -399C->T and -287T->C, in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) (n = 24) or factor V Leiden (n = 44) who had a history of VTE (n = 26), compared with those without VTE (n = 42) and also with normal control individuals (n = 56). TFPI activity was measured using a modified amidolytic assay and genotypes were determined by polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism. We found that only APS patients with a history of venous thrombosis had TFPI activity levels significantly different from control individuals (1.77 +/- 0.60 vs 0.77 +/- 0.19 U/ml; P = 0.0001), and this was associated with inheritance of the TFPI -33C allele (1.70 +/- 0.72 U/ml for TC/CC genotypes vs 0.97 +/- 0.56 U/ml for TT; P = 0.01). Multivariate analysis of APS and factor V Leiden patients revealed that the greatest independent contributor to VTE was TFPI activity (adjusted odds ratio = 16.84; 95% confidence interval = 2.47-114.36, P = 0.004), while inheritance of either the TFPI -33C or -399T alleles each increased the odds of VTE by nearly 13 times (95% confidence interval = 2.39-69.91, P = 0.003; and 95% confidence interval = 2.25-71.23, P = 0.004, respectively). These results indicate that the TFPI -33T->C and -399C->T polymorphisms are significantly associated with venous thrombosis in the presence of other risk factors, especially APS, and may be clinically relevant in patients who are prone to hypercoagulability.     

Risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with the factor V Leiden (FVR506Q) mutation: effect of warfarin and prediction by precipitating factors

Three cohorts of patients with the factor V Leiden mutation were recruited independently (heterozygotes, homozygotes and combined thrombophilia). The antithrombotic efficacy of oral anticoagulation and the predictive value for recurrence of an idiopathic as opposed to a precipitated first event were determined. Idiopathic first events occurred at an older age than precipitated events (43 v 26 years, LR = 23.31, P  < 0.001). None of the patients had a recurrent event while on warfarin but the median time to recurrence after stopping warfarin was 9 years (95%CI 0.7–17.3 years). The time to recurrence was shorter when the first event was idiopathic as opposed to precipitated (3.5 v 13 years, LR = 4.76, P  = 0.029). A calculation of benefit to risk of oral anticoagulation with a target INR of 2.5 does not support the use of long-term therapy in all patients with the factor V Leiden mutation following a first thrombotic event.     

Impact of the factor II: G20210A variant on the risk of venous thromboembolism in relatives from families with the factor V: R506Q mutation

OBJECTIVES: Factor V: R506Q mutation and the prothrombin G20210A variant (factor II: G20210A variant) are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). In cohorts of unrelated patients a cosegregation of both mutations has been shown to be associated with an increased risk of developing VTE. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the coinheritance of both mutations on the risk of VTE in relatives of symptomatic carriers of the factor V: R506Q mutation and the factor II: G20210A variant. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four families with 48 family members were investigated for the presence of the factor V: R506Q mutation and the factor II: G20210A mutation, and their clinical history was evaluated. RESULTS: VTE was more frequent in family members with a combined defect (3/10; 30%) compared to those with a single mutation (1/16; 6%) or without a defect (1/12; 8%). The probability for VTE for 40-yr-old individuals with both mutations, a single mutation and no mutation was 56%, 12% and 20%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the G to A transition at position 20210 of the prothrombin gene leads to an increase in the risk of VTE in carriers of the factor V: R506Q mutation. The determination of the factor II: G20210A variant in index patients carrying a factor V: R506Q mutation and, if present, in family members may help to identify individuals who are at high risk for VTE.     

The risk of pregnancy-related venous thromboembolism in women who are homozygous for factor V Leiden

The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is increased in pregnancy and during the post-partum period. The absolute risk for pregnancy-related VTE in heterozygous women with the factor V Leiden mutation is approximately 2%, but studies on this risk for homozygous women show conflicting results. In a retrospective family study, we found that the risk of pregnancy-related VTE in women with a symptomatic first-degree relative was 17% per pregnancy (95%CI 4.7-37.4). Anticoagulant prophylaxis during the post-partum period appears to be indicated in asymptomatic homozygous women from symptomatic kindred, whereas this could be decided on an individual basis during pregnancy.     

Impaired APC cofactor activity of factor V plays a major role in the APC resistance associated with the factor V Leiden (R506Q) and R2 (H1299R) mutations

Activated protein C (APC) resistance is a major risk factor for venous thrombosis. Factor V (FV) gene mutations like FV(Leiden) (R506Q) and FV(R2) (H1299R) may cause APC resistance either by reducing the susceptibility of FVa to APC-mediated inactivation or by interfering with the cofactor activity of FV in APC-catalyzed FVIIIa inactivation. We quantified the APC cofactor activity expressed by FV(Leiden) and FV(R2) and determined the relative contributions of reduced susceptibility and impaired APC cofactor activity to the APC resistance associated with these mutations. Plasmas containing varying concentrations of normal FV, FV(Leiden), or FV(R2) were assayed with an APC resistance assay that specifically measures the APC cofactor activity of FV in FVIIIa inactivation, and with the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)-based assay, which probes both the susceptibility and APC cofactor components. FV(R2) expressed 73% of the APC cofactor activity of normal FV, whereas FV(Leiden) exhibited no cofactor activity in FVIIIa inactivation. Poor susceptibility to APC and impaired APC cofactor activity contributed equally to FV(Leiden)-associated APC resistance, whereas FV(R2)-associated APC resistance was entirely due to the reduced APC cofactor activity of FV(R2). Thrombin generation assays confirmed the importance of the anticoagulant activity of FV and indicated that FV(Leiden) homozygotes are exposed to a higher thrombotic risk than heterozygotes because their plasma lacks normal FV acting as an anticoagulant protein.     

The prevalence of factor V Leiden as a risk factor for venous thromboembolism in the population of North-Western Greece.

BACKGROUND: Many predisposing factors have been associated with the development of venous thromboembolism. Recently, Factor V Leiden has been described as a common genetic risk factor. The geographic distribution of this genetic abnormality in the general population greatly varies. The prevalence of the Factor V Leiden mutation in Europe is high, particularly in Greece, where according to some authors it is especially high. The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of the Factor V Leiden mutation in patients presenting with at least one episode of venous thromboembolism and to compare it with that of the general population. METHODS: Blood samples were drawn from 388 subjects. 240 healthy blood donors (controls) and 148 unselected patients with a history of one or more episodes of venous thrombosis. DNA analysis was performed using the polymerase chain reaction to amplify the factor V gene exon 10, and to detect the Factor V Leiden point mutation. RESULTS: DNA analysis revealed Factor V Leiden mutations in eight (3.3%) control subjects (seven heterozygous and one homozygous) and in twenty-four (16.2%) patients, (twenty-two heterozygous and two homozygous). The difference between the two groups is statistically significant (p<0.0001; chi2 test). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of the Factor V Leiden mutation in the general population of North-Western Greece is 3.3%, which is within the same range as that reported for other European countries. The Factor V Leiden mutation is one of the most important predisposing genetic factors in the development of venous thrombosis and was present in 16.2% of our patients.     

Coincidence of 20210A prothrombin variant and factor V Leiden predisposing to venous thromboembolism

Coexistence of inherited and environmental risks leads to the high hazard of venous thromboembolism. In such cases, there might be difficulties in the diagnosis and treatment of recurrent episodes. The importance of Factor V Leiden and prothrombin variant 20210A in the pathogenesis of venous thromboembolic disease, is widely accepted, but the carriership of thrombophilic genes' variants is usually not sufficient for the development of the disease. We report two cases of familial thrombophilia with concurrent presence of prothrombin variant 20210A and factor V Leiden. In a 28-year-old woman: pregnancy, immobilization, obstetric intervention appeared to precipitate the thromboembolic complication. In the second patient, the genetic studies revealed both thrombophilic mutations which could predispose to the recurrent venous thromboembolism, previously thought to be idiopathic. We discuss diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties in such patients.