Antianginal Response to Once-Daily Diltiazem CD in Patients Receiving Concomitant β-Blockers,Long-Acting Nitrates,or Both

Study Objective . To determine the safety and efficacy of diltiazem CD 180 mg administered once/day in patients with chronic stable angina inadequately controlled with β-blockers, long-acting nitrates, or both. Design . Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial. Setting . Medical clinics in the private and academic sectors. Patients . Of 172 patients, 170 completed the 2-week double-blind treatment period. Interventions . Patients received either diltiazem CD 180 mg or placebo once/day in combination with existing antianginal therapy. Measurements and Main Results . The time to termination of exercise tolerance testing, 24 hours after the dose increased significantly in the diltiazem CD group (37.2 sec) compared with the placebo group (21.3 sec, p=0.0438). Time to onset of angina during exercise testing also increased (57.6 vs 35.0 sec, respectively, p=0.0324), as did time to moderate angina (37.5 vs 20.6 sec, respectively, p=0.0354). The rates of total angina attacks and of angina attacks on exertion were significantly reduced in the diltiazem CD group versus placebo (p<0.05). Significant reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressures and heart rate-blood pressure product measured at rest, submaximum exercise, and exercise termination were observed in diltiazem CD-treated patients compared with placebo (p<0.05). The frequency of treatment-related adverse events was identical in the two groups, 15.1%. Conclusion . Diltiazem CD 180 mg once/day is an effective, safe, and beneficial initial dosage when added to existing antianginal therapy.     

Ranolazine (RS-43285): A preliminary study of a new anti-anginal agent with selective effect on ischaemic myocardium

Summary Ranolazine (RS-43285) has been shown to possess significant anti-ischaemic properties in a canine model of reversible myocardial ischaemia. The clinical efficacy of this new agent was assessed by a single blind, placebo controlled study of 14 patients with chronic stable angina. A 2 week placebo phase was followed by therapy with 30 mg and 60 mg of ranolazine tid for 2 weeks each. Graded, symptom limited treadmill exercise tests were performed at the end of each phase, 1.5 h (AM) and 7 h (PM) after the morning dose. An additional exercise test 1.5 h after the first dose of 30 mg was included to assess the acute dose response.In the AM study, the mean exercise time increased from 6.9 min (placebo) to 7.8 min after the first dose of 30 mg and to 8.2 min and 8.5 min respectively at the end of 30 mg and 60 mg phases. In the PM study, exercise time improved from 6.5 min (placebo) to 8.2 min and 7.8 min respectively at the end of 30 mg and 60 mg phases. The time to onset of angina showed a similar improvement.No significant changes were observed in the resting and peak exercise heart rates and blood pressure.This preliminary study suggests that ranolazine may significantly prolong exercise time in patients with stable coronary artery disease without altering heart rates and blood pressure.     

Efficacy and Tolerability of Nisoldipine Coat-Core vs Diltiazem Retard in Combination with a Beta-Blocker in Patients with Stable Exertional Angina Pectoris

A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial with forced titration study to investigate possible equivalence of efficacy and tolerability between nisoldipine coat-core (CC) 40mg once daily, and diltiazem retard 120mg twice daily, was carried out in 176 patients with stable angina pectoris who were already receiving beta-blocker therapy. A total of 164 patients were included in the tolerability analysis and 135 patients were evaluable for efficacy (nisoldipine CC, n = 69; diltiazem retard, n = 66). During bicycle exercise tolerance tests, time to 1mm ST-segment depression, total exercise time, and time to angina were assessed at baseline and at the end of the treatment period. The number of angina attacks and of consumed nitroglycerin tablets were recorded in weekly diaries. Time to onset of 1mm ST-segment depression increased by 69.4 +/- 100.0 seconds with nisoldipine CC and by 65.9 +/- 87.6 seconds with diltiazem retard. The two treatment regimens were equally effective in time to onset of 1mm ST-segment depression, time to angina pectoris, and in exercise duration. A beneficial effect on angina attacks and nitroglycerin consumption was achieved with both treatments. Patient compliance, as assessed by the number of returned tablets, was high, at over 80%. Six patients withdrew from the treatment because of adverse events. Mild and transient adverse events were reported by 24 patients during treatment. One patient experienced a severe circulatory shock on the combination of diltiazem retard and atenolol. Peripheral oedema and headache were more common on nisoldipine CC. We concluded that the two treatments were equally efficacious and tolerated in patients with stable angina pectoris.     

Ranolazine in the management of chronic stable angina.

PURPOSE: A review of the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical trials, safety, and efficacy of ranolazine is presented. SUMMARY: Ranolazine has recently been approved as adjunctive treatment for chronic stable angina (CSA). Data suggest that ranolazine exerts its antiischemic effect through antagonism of the late sodium current and other cardiac ion channels. Peak plasma levels of ranolazine have been observed two to five hours following repeated dosing and are unaffected by food. In placebo-controlled and active-controlled clinical trials conducted with ranolazine, ranolazine has been effective in the treatment of patients with CSA. One trial demonstrated that monotherapy with extended-release ranolazine was effective against angina and ischemia in patients with CSA. Ranolazine improved exercise duration and time to onset of angina. In a trial in which ranolazine was given in combination with atenolol, diltiazem, or amlodipine, ranolazine produced clinically significant improvement in exercise duration and reduced the incidence of anginal attacks compared with placebo. Another trial demonstrated that extended-release ranolazine 1000 mg given twice daily reduced mean weekly angina episodes in patients with chronic angina. Ranolazine is generally well tolerated. In clinical trials, adverse effects were seen more in the ranolazine groups than in the placebo groups. CONCLUSION: Despite a lack of mortality data, ranolazine has demonstrated its efficacy and safety, either as monotherapy or in combination with other antianginal agents, in the management of CSA. Patients who fail optimal therapy with standard-of-care antianginal agents are the best candidates for treatment with ranolazine.     

Clinical utility of nifedipine and diltiazem plasma levels in patients with angina pectoris receiving monotherapy and combination treatment

The clinical utility of nifedipine and diltiazem blood levels in patients with angina pectoris receiving monotherapy (N = 14) and combination treatment (N = 9) were assessed in a placebo run-in, double blind, randomized, crossover study. Compared to placebo, diltiazem (mean daily dose 360 mg), nifedipine (mean daily dose 90 mg) and combination diltiazem-nifedipine therapy (mean daily dose 55 mg of nifedipine, 360 mg of diltiazem) were associated with reductions in weekly angina attacks and nitroglycerin consumption. Although both drugs used as monotherapy and in combination were also associated with significant increments in exercise tolerance and other improved angina parameters, these changes were not related to the plasma levels of either drug. Nifedipine plasma levels were measured by gas chromatography and diltiazem plasma levels measured by reverse high-pressure liquid chromatography from specimens obtained 2-5 hours after the last previous dose, after 1, 2 and 3 weeks of treatment, and during baseline placebo and placebo washout periods. With combination therapy, there was no effect on the diltiazem plasma level compared to monotherapy. The significant decrease in the nifedipine dose in patients on combination therapy did not significantly change nifedipine plasma levels. Determinations of plasma levels of diltiazem and nifedipine in the management of patients is of no value in the management of patients with angina pectoris except for monitoring treatment compliance and overdosage.     

Diltiazem and Propranolol,Alone and in Combination,on Exercise Performance and Left Ventricular Function in Patients with Stable Effort Angina: A Double-Blind,Randomized, and Placebo-Controlled Study

Abstract: Diltiazem and propranolol alone and in combination as antianginal agents were compared with placebo in 12 patients with stable exertional angina at Stanford University Medical Center. The patients performed symptom-limited, multi-stage upright bicycle ergometric exercise while undergoing radionuclide angiographic studies every two weeks while being treated with 90 mg of diltiazem four times daily, 60 mg of propranolol four times daily, a combination of 90 mg of diltiazem and 60 mg of propranolol four times daily, and placebo. Diltiazem, propranolol and a combination all significantly increased exercise duration compared to placebo (526 ± 149 , 525 ± 115 , and 549 ± 129 vs 430 ± 132 sec). Although rate pressure product and heart rate decreased with diltiazem therapy at submaximal workloads, these values were unchanged at peak exercise in contrast to propranolol or the combination of propranolol or diltiazem. Diltiazem decreased the sub-maximal and maximal degree of exercise-induced ST segment depression by over 50% compared to placebo (P < 0.01 vs placebo). Diltiazem resulted in a higher exercise left ventricular ejection fraction compared to placebo, propranolol or the combination of diltiazem or propranolol (all less than P < 0.05). Sinus bradycardia or orthostatic hypertension occurred in four patients on the high-dose combination therapy and required dose reduction. We concluded that high-dose diltiazem, appeared to be even more effective than moderate-dose propranolol or the combination of diltiazem and propranolol in improving exercise tolerance, electrocardiographic evidence of myocardial ischaemia and left ventricular function in patients with stable effort angina due to occlusive coronary artery disease.     

An 8-week double-blind study of amlodipine and diltiazem in patients with stable exertional angina pectoris

A multicenter, double-blind study was performed to compare the antianginal efficacy and safety of the new dihydropyridine calcium antagonist amlodipine with the benzothiazepine calcium antagonist diltiazem in patients with stable exertional angina pectoris. Following a 2-week placebo run-in period, 39 patients were randomized to receive amlodipine (2.5-10 mg once daily) and 41 patients to receive diltiazem (60-120 mg three times daily) in an 8-week double-blind treatment phase. The study used standardized bicycle exercise testing as a primary efficacy assessment. Patients also recorded angina frequency and nitroglycerin (NTG) tablet consumption/ week. Treatment with amlodipine and diltiazem resulted in an improvement in total exercise time, time to angina and total work, mean ST-segment deviation at maximum common load, median number of angina attacks/week, and NTG tablet consumption/week. The incidence and severity of possibly treatment-related side effects and laboratory test abnormalities were comparable for both drugs. The most frequently reported side effects were dizziness, headache, peripheral edema, and nausea. Two patients withdrew from diltiazem treatment due to pruritus in one case and severe headache and moderate dyspnea in the other. No amlodipine-treated patients withdrew due to side effects. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that the antianginal efficacy and tolerability of amlodipine is equivalent to diltiazem, but amlodipine has the advantage of once-daily dosing.     

A pilot double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study of molsidomine 16 mg once-a-day in patients suffering from stable angina pectoris: correlation between efficacy and over time plasma concentrations

OBJECTIVES: A new once-a-day (o.a.d.) formulation of molsidomine (16 mg) was evaluated in patients with stable angina pectoris. The aims were to characterize its pharmacokinetics after a single dose, to demonstrate its clinical efficacy and safety versus placebo and to investigate correlations between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. METHODS: Forty-two patients were recruited in a double-blind, crossover, randomized placebo-controlled trial. The pharmacokinetics of molsidomine and SIN-1, its active metabolite, were determined at specific time points (3, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22 and 24 h) after the administration of a single dose of molsidomine 16 mg o.a.d. in all patients distributed into seven groups. Twenty-eight of these 42 patients showed a positive baseline cycloergometric exercise test response during the run-in placebo period and were used to compare the efficacy of molsidomine to placebo. Relationships between plasma concentration in molsidomine or SIN-1 and ischemic threshold were assessed in 16 of the 28 patients with a positive exercise test at baseline. Indeed, the censored variable ischemia-limited tolerance to exercise could not be evaluated in those patients who did not show exercise-induced ischemia anymore under molsidomine 16 mg o.a.d. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships were evaluated using regression models and correlation coefficients. RESULTS: The highest average concentration in molsidomine and SIN-1 occurred after 6 h, then a plateau of 15-20 ng/ml molsidomine and 0.8-3.0 ng/ml SIN-1 was maintained for at least 8 h and the mean residual molsidomine concentration 24 h post-drug intake was around 8 ng/ml, still in the effective range of 5-10 ng/ml. A significant increase in total workload (+52 W min, P=0.009), total exercise time (+32 s, P=0.003) and time to angina (+25 s, P=0.016) was measured with molsidomine 16 mg o.a.d. relative to placebo. Using linear regression, significant correlation coefficients were determined between molsidomine plasma concentrations (but not SIN-1) and exercise test improvements (r=0.827, P<0.001 for the total workload; r=0.772, P<0.001 for the total exercise time; and r=0.566, P=0.028 for the time to 1 mm ST-segment depression). CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetics of molsidomine 16 mg in patients with stable angina pectoris is compatible with a o.a.d. dosage regimen. This o.a.d. formulation is effective and well-tolerated, providing a 24-h therapeutic control of myocardial ischemia. A positive and significant linear relationship between molsidomine plasma concentration and the increase in exercise tolerance was observed.     

In Process Citation

This double-blind dose-response crossover study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of sustained-release (SR) and conventional diltiazem over 4 weeks in patients with stable angina pectoris. Following a 2-week placebo run-in period, 26 patients were randomised into 3 parallel groups to receive either diltiazem SR (180, 240 or 300mg once daily) or conventional diltiazem 60mg three times daily for 2 weeks. Treatments were then crossed over for a further 2-week study period. Antianginal efficacy was evaluated using submaximal treadmill exercise testing. At baseline, all 3 treatment groups were comparable for all parameters. Treatment with both conventional and SR formulations improved exercise time and reduced intensity of ischaemia, but the difference between groups at the end of each 2-week treatment phase was not statistically significant. The results did not suggest a dose-response relationship. Adverse reactions necessitated treatment discontinuation in two patients being treated with conventional diltiazem and in one patient receiving diltiazem SR 240mg. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that diltiazem SR 180, 240 and 300mg did not differ from the conventional formulation in terms of anti-ischaemic efficacy.     

Ranolazine (Roche Bioscience)

Ranolazine is a metabolic modulator that is being developed by CV Therapeutics (CVT), under license from Roche (formerly Syntex), as a potential treatment for angina. In August 1999, the first of two pivotal phase III clinical trials in patients with stable angina was completed. In August 1999, CVT announced initial results from this trial, designated the MARISA trial, of ranolazine in patients with stable angina. At each of the three doses studied, ranolazine significantly increased patients' treadmill exercise duration compared to placebo, the primary endpoint for this trial. MARISA (monotherapy assessment of ranolazine in stable angina) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a sustained release formulation of ranolazine used in 175 patients who were not receiving other anti-anginal drugs. Compared to placebo, ranolazine taken bid at doses of 500, 1000 or 1500 mg significantly increased exercise duration at trough plasma concentrations, which occur at about 12 h after the previous dose. In addition, two key secondary endpoints, exercise time to onset of angina and exercise time to the electrocardiographic appearance of ischemia were also significantly increased by ranolazine compared to placebo at all three doses. The company plans on presenting additional data at a major medical conference, including safety and tolerability data, which are still under analysis. In July 1999 CVT initiated its second phase III trial. The CARISA trial (combination assessment of ranolazine in stable angina) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ranolazine used in combination with other anti-anginal drugs, in approximately 450 patients. The primary endpoint for this trial, duration of exercise on a treadmill, is identical to that used in phase II clinical trials. The CARISA trial, along with the pivotal phase III MARISA trial which completed treatment in June 1999, is expected to form the basis of the company's NDA submission to the FDA. In June 1999, results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study of ranolazine in chronic stable angina pectoris were published in the July 1, 1999 issue of the American Journal of Cardiology. The study of 312 patients demonstrated that ranolazine may increase exercise time in chronic stable angina patients. The results also indicate that there may be no change in heart rate or blood pressure among any of the ranolazine dosing regimens. In January 1999, CVT received regulatory clearance in Canada, the Czech Republic and Poland and initiated its first pivotal phase III trial for ranolazine in these countries. These new clinical trial centers complement the US centers enrolling American patients. The compound allows maintenance of energy output by muscle cells by improving oxygen metabolism to make the heart pump more efficiently. Ranolazine may be especially useful in angina patients in whom other therapies are ineffective. Clinical studies suggest that ranolazine lowers the heart's demand for oxygen, by increasing its ability to use carbohydrate rather than fat as a fuel. This is thought to be due to activation of pyruvate dehydrogenase, and also by modulating the activities of L-type calcium channels. This is achieved without reducing heart rate or blood pressure, or impairing pumping ability. In August 1998, CVT signed an agreement with Catalytica Pharmaceuticals, which will manufacture specified quantities of ranolazine for use in clinical trials.     

A comparison of nine calcium ion antagonists and propranolol: Exercise tolerance,heart rate and ST-segment changes in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris

Summary The effects of nine calcium ion antagonists on exercise tolerance, heart rate and ST-segment changes were compared with those of propranolol in two hundred and eighty patients with established chronic stable angina pectoris. These patients participated in clinical trials for anti-anginal efficacy against placebo, using identical methods and similar protocols, but the comprison reported here was retrospective. The trials were all fixed dose, and the dose was determined by previous upward titration to arrive at an average maximal tolerance level. All the drugs except prenylamine increased the exercise tolerance significantly when compared with placebo. Maximal ST-segment depression on exercise was reduced during treatment with propranolol while treatment with the calcium ion antagonists had no significant effect. The time to the development of 1 mm ST-segment depression was prolonged by all the drugs. Nifedipine, PY-108-068 and nicardipine increased the resting heart rate whereas verapamil, diltiazem, gallopamil, KB-944, prenylamine and tiapamil produced a slight reduction. Propranolol produced a highly significant reduction in the resting and maximal heart rates and the rate-pressure product, whereas gallopamil increased the rate-pressure product by +8% and prenylamine reduced it by-10%. At the doses used, diltiazem, gallopamil and verapamil produced a greater increase in exercise tolerance than did propranolol, while the other drugs were inferior. None of the calcium ion antagonists matched the increase in the time taken to develop 1 mm ST-segment depression with propranolol, although the results with verapamil and gallopamil were close. The calcium ion antagonists are effective antianginal agents which produce their effects by mechanisms which are very different to the beta-adrenoreceptor blocking agents.     

尼可地尔、普萘洛尔和地尔硫治疗心绞痛的血流动力学

31例(男24,女7;年龄55±11yr)慢性稳定型心绞痛患者分4组,其中10例口服尼可地尔30mg,bid;7例口服普萘洛尔80mg,bid和9例口服地尔硫(艹卓)120mg,bid;5例为口服安慰剂组。并于首次服药后2h及持续服药2wk后进行踏车运动试验,观察比较药物对心绞痛患者休息或运动峰时的血流动力学变化。发现3种药物都能延长运动时间,延长心电图ST段呈缺血性压低1mm所需时间和心绞痛发作时间。     

Lack of negative inotropic effects of the new calcium antagonist Ro 40-5967 in patients with stable angina pectoris.

We screened the antiischemic, hemodynamic, and inotropic effects of different dosages of the new calcium channel blocker Ro 40-5967 in 65 patients with stable effort-induced angina pectoris. In a double-blind way, patients were randomized to recieve a single oral dose of 50, 100, or 200 mg Ro 40-5967 or placebo, given as a drinking solution. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), blood pressure (BP), and heart rate (HR) were measured at rest and during a supine bicycle exercise test on day 0 (baseline) and 2 h after drug intake on day 1. Twenty-four hours later, the bicycle exercise test was repeated. Ro 40-5967 improved exercise duration and resting LVEF. After 200 mg, exercise time increased significantly from 8.4 +/- 0.8 min (mean +/- SEM) to 9.6 +/- 0.7 min (p = 0.018), and LVEF at rest increased from 54.5 +/- 2.2 to 58.1 +/- 2.6% (p = 0.045). Time to 0.1 mV ST-segment depression increased significantly from 4.3 +/- 0.8 to 5.5 +/- 0.9 min in the 100-mg group (p = 0.013) and from 4.3 +/- 1.3 to 5.4 +/- 1.5 min in the 200-mg group (p = 0.027). Maximum ST-segment depression decreased significantly at all dose levels (p = 0.01), with the maximum decrease noted in the 200-mg group (from 0.21 +/- 0.03 to 0.15 +/- 0.02 mV, p = 0.004). BP, HR, and rate-pressure product did not change significantly at rest or at maximum exercise. A single dose of Ro 40-5967 has antiischemic properties in patients with stable angina pectoris, with maximum effects obtained after 200 mg. No signs of negative inotropy were noted, and the drug was well tolerated.     

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel dose-response study of amlodipine in stable exertional angina pectoris

A placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-response study of amlodipine (1.25, 2.5, 5, and 10 mg once daily) was carried out in 136 patients with stable exertional angina pectoris. Improvements in total exercise tolerance, time to onset of angina during exercise, ST-segment deviation at maximum common load, frequency of angina attacks, and nitroglycerin consumption were greater following amlodipine than placebo. The maximum improvement in exercise parameters occurred with the highest dose of amlodipine. All doses produced significant reductions in angina attack frequency and the rate of nitroglycerin consumption. Amlodipine was well tolerated and no patients were withdrawn due to adverse events or laboratory abnormalities.     

Twenty-four hour efficacy of two dose levels of a once daily sustained-release diltiazem formulation in stable angina: a placebo-controlled trial. The Dildurang Study Group.

1. This placebo-controlled study assessed once daily sustained-release (SR) diltiazem, 200 and 300 mg, in 182 stable angina patients with positive exercise test. 2. Exercise testing was performed at baseline after a 7 day placebo run-in period, and repeated after 7 days of treatment, 25.0 +/- 0.1 h postdose. 3. Diltiazem (200 and 300 mg) produced respectively a 68% and a 64% decrease in weekly angina episodes, and placebo a 15% decrease (P < 0.05). Similarly, both dose levels produced a 70% decrease in nitroglycerin consumption, whereas no difference was obtained with placebo (P < 0.01). The increase in time to ischaemic threshold was significantly superior for 200 mg and 300 mg diltiazem when compared with placebo (75.2 and 91.5 s respectively vs 47.0 s) (P < 0.05); increase in time to anginal threshold was also significantly greater for diltiazem when compared with placebo (84.6 and 85.9 s respectively vs 43.9 s) (P < 0.05). 4. Only one patient experienced worsening of angina and had to be withdrawn from the study. 5. This study demonstrates 200 and 300 mg SR diltiazem is effective when given once-a-day in the prophylaxis of stable exertional angina. This once daily formulation should improve patients' compliance and comfort.     

A randomized, double-blind comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of once-daily modified-release diltiazem capsules with once-daily amlodipine tablets in patients with stable angina

A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study comparing the efficacy and tolerability of once-daily diltiazem capsules with amlodipine tablets in patients with stable angina. After a run-in period of 1 to 3 weeks, 34 patients received once-daily diltiazem and 33 patients received amlodipine. Patients received either diltiazem, 240 mg/day, or amlodipine, 5 mg/day, for 2 weeks followed by diltiazem, 360 mg/day, or amlodipine, 10 mg/day, for 2 weeks. Standard treadmill exercise testing was the primary efficacy assessment. Patients also recorded incidence of angina attacks and use of glyceryl trinitrate spray. Both treatments gave significant improvement in time to onset of angina and time to maximal exercise. With the exception of amlodipine, 5 mg/day, both treatments gave significant increases in time to 1-mm ST segment depression. Diltiazem, 360 mg/day, gave a significant decrease in rate pressure product. There were no significant treatment differences in any of the exercise test parameters. Both treatments reduced incidence of angina attacks and use of glyceryl trinitrate spray. The incidence of edema was significantly less in patients receiving diltiazem. In conclusion, both treatments were effective in controlling patients' angina, but diltiazem was better tolerated, with a lower incidence of edema.     

The peripheral vascular effects of diltiazem--dose-response characteristics.

The acute effects of increasing doses of diltiazem on peripheral blood flow were observed in six subjects. Each subject received, in random order, a single oral dose of placebo or diltiazem 60, 120 or 180 mg. Supine heart rate, blood pressure, skin temperature, digital systolic pressure, forearm and digital blood flow were recorded before and at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 h post-dosing. Plasma diltiazem concentrations were measured at each time interval and at 12 and 24 h after the 120 mg dose. At doses of 120 and 180 mg, diltiazem significantly increased digital blood flow at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 h post-dosing and forearm blood flow at 2 and 3 h following 180 mg and 3 h following 120 mg. No correlation was observed between plasma diltiazem concentration and changes in peripheral blood flow.     

硝苯地平控释片3种剂量治疗稳定性心绞痛疗效比较

目的 :比较硝苯地平控释片小、中和大剂量治疗稳定性心绞痛的疗效。方法 :1 0 2例病人被随机分为 4组 ,分别接受硝苯地平控释片 30mg·d-1(n =2 7) ,60mg·d-1 (n =2 5) ,90mg·d-1 (n =2 6)和安慰剂 (n =2 4 )治疗 ,为期 6wk。结果 :经过 6wk的治疗后 ,硝苯地平控释片 3种剂量均能显著减少心绞痛发作次数及硝酸甘油消耗量 ;均能延长运动至ST压低 1mm时间和总运动时间 ;各治疗组治疗前后或与对照组比较 ,差异均有显著或非常显著意义 (P <0 .0 5或P <0 .0 1 )。临床症状总有效率分别为 81 % ,88%和 89% ;心电图总有效率分别为56 % ,60 %和 65 %。不良反应发生率 90mg组高于其余 3组。结论 :硝苯地平控释片 30 ,60和 90mg·d-1 短期治疗均能有效改善稳定性心绞痛病人的临床症状、心电图及运动能力 ,但每日剂量以低于60mg为宜     

Comparison of bopindolol and atenolol in chronic stable angina pectoris

Summary The efficacy of bopindolol and atenolol in the treatment of patients with chronic stable angina pectoris have been compared in a double blind, randomized study.Both bopindolol 1 mg and atenolol 100 mg for 6 weeks increased mean exercise time (25% and 22%, respectively, compared to placebo), time to angina (27% and 25%), and time to 1 mm of ST-segment depression (32% and 20%).Both drugs reduced ST-segment depression similarly at maximal and submaximal work levels.There was no significant difference in their antianginal efficacy.     

Antihypertensive efficacy of twice daily controlled release diltiazem using 24 hour intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring

The aim of the study was to examine the efficacy of a new controlled release formulation of diltiazem administered in a twice-daily dose in patients with essential hypertension using 24 hour intra-arterial ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.Sixteen patients (2 female) of mean age 53 years with mild to moderate essential hypertension, defined as a supine resting diastolic cuff blood pressure 95 mm Hg, were recruited to a sequential dose ranging study of controlled release (CR) diltiazem. After a six week run-in period without any anti-hypertensive medication, intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring with 60° tilt, isometric handgrip and bicycle exercise testing were performed. Patients were then treated for one week with CR diltiazem 120 mg b.i.d. If supine resting diastolic cuff blood pressure fell by <10 mm Hg compared to the last run-in value and remained >90 mm Hg, the dose was increased to 240 mg b.i.d. for a week, and if necessary to 360 mg b.i.d. for a week. Patients continued for further one month on the dose of CR diltiazem at which they achieved target blood pressure reduction. At the end of this maintenance treatment, 24 hour intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring was repeated.Twelve patients were satisfactorily controlled on 120 mg b.i.d. CR diltiazem, three on 240 mg twice daily and one on 360 mg twice daily. During rest and exercise, blood pressure and heart rate were significantly lower after treatment with CR diltiazem than before treatment. The hypotensive effect of diltiazem was maintained throughout the 12 hour dosing interval and the early morning blood pressure response was blunted. No adverse effects or ECG abnormalities were reported.It was concluded that CR diltiazem 120 mg, administered twice daily to a total daily dose of between 240 mg and 720 mg, is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension.