Salvage therapy for acute myeloid leukemia with fludarabine,cytarabine, and idarubicin with or without gemtuzumab ozogamicin and with concurrent or sequential G‐CSF

The current salvage therapies for relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are unsatisfactory. Over the past 7 years, we have used two salvage regimens: fludarabine, cytarabine, and idarubicin with (FLAG‐IM) or without gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) (9 mg/m² on Day 8) (FLAG‐I) in relapsed/refractory AML. Three‐quarters of patients also received concurrent G‐CSF. Seventy‐one patients were treated, 23 with FLAG‐I and 48 with FLAG‐IM. The median duration of follow‐up was 30.6 months. The treatment groups were well balanced with median ages of 48 years (range 18–70) and 47 years (range 20–68), unfavorable cytogenetics in 57% and 35%, prior allogeneic stem cell transplant in 43% and 42%, and CR1 duration <1 year in 60% and 67%, respectively, for FLAG‐I and FLAG‐IM. The complete remission (CR) rate in the FLAG‐I group was 39% with an additional 13% achieving a CRp [overall response rate (ORR) 52%]; the CR rate in the FLAG‐IM group was 29% with an additional 27% achieving a CRp (ORR 56%). The median duration of response (DOR; 16.8 vs. 8.3 months), event‐free survival (EFS; 7.4 vs. 4.1 months), and overall survival (OS; 8.8 vs. 5.0 months) trended to favor FLAG‐I over FLAG‐IM. The patients who received G‐CSF concurrent with chemotherapy had superior overall response rate (ORR; 62% vs. 29%, P = 0.026), median EFS (6.2 vs. 3.4 months, P = 0.010), and OS (8.8 vs. 3.9 months, P = 0.004) when compared with those who sequentially received G‐CSF and chemotherapy, regardless of chemotherapy regimen. The addition of GO, at this dose and schedule, to FLAG‐I failed to improve the outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory AML. The patients who received G‐CSF concurrently with chemotherapy had improved outcomes. Am. J. Hematol., 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

A prognostic model for survival after salvage treatment with FLAG‐Ida +/− gemtuzumab‐ozogamicine in adult patients with refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia

The combination of fludarabine, cytarabine, idarubicin, and granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (FLAG‐Ida) is widely used in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). We retrospectively analysed the results of 259 adult AML patients treated as first salvage with FLAG‐Ida or FLAG‐Ida plus Gentuzumab‐Ozogamicin (FLAGO‐Ida) of the Programa Español de Tratamientos en Hematología (PETHEMA) database, developing a prognostic score system of survival in this setting (SALFLAGE score). Overall, 221 patients received FLAG‐Ida and 38 FLAGO‐Ida; 92 were older than 60 years. The complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) rate was 51%, with 9% of induction deaths. Three covariates were associated with lower CR/CRi: high‐risk cytogenetics and t(8;21) at diagnosis, no previous allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo‐SCT) and relapse‐free interval <1 year. Allo‐SCT was performed in second CR in 60 patients (23%). The median overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was 0·7 years, with 22% OS at 5‐years. Four independent variables were used to construct the score: cytogenetics, FLT3‐internal tandem duplication, length of relapse‐free interval and previous allo‐SCT. Using this stratification system, three groups were defined: favourable (26% of patients), intermediate (29%) and poor‐risk (45%), with an expected 5‐year OS of 52%, 26% and 7%, respectively. The SALFLAGE score discriminated a subset of patients with an acceptable long‐term outcome using FLAG‐Ida/FLAGO‐Ida regimen. The results of this retrospective analysis should be validated in independent external cohorts.     

Sorafenib Combined with 5‐azacytidine in Older Patients with Untreated FLT3‐ITD Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Based on our previous study of the combination of sorafenib with 5‐azacytidine (AZA) in relapsed/refractory patients with FLT3 mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML), we hypothesized that the combination would be efficacious and well tolerated in untreated patients with FLT3 mutated AML who are unsuitable for standard chemotherapy due to advanced age or lack of fitness. Newly diagnosed patients with untreated FLT3 mutated AML who underwent frontline therapy on 2 separate protocols of AZA plus sorafenib were analyzed. The clinical trials were registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02196857 and NCT01254890). Overall, 27 patients with untreated FLT3 mutated AML (median age of 74 years, range, 61‐86) were enrolled. The overall response rate was 78% (7 [26%] CR, 12 [44%] CRi/CRp, and 2 [7%] PR). Patients received a median of 3 treatment cycles (1–35). The median duration of CR/CRp/CRi is 14.5 months (1.1–28.7 months). Three (11%) responding patients (1 CR, 2 CRi) proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplant. The median follow‐up for surviving patients was 4.1 months (3.0–17.3 months). The median overall survival for the entire group was 8.3 months, and 9.2 months in the 19 responders. The regimen was well tolerated in elderly patients with untreated FLT3 mutated AML with no early deaths.     

Continuous infusion of intermediate‐dose cytarabine and fludarabine with idarubicin for patients younger than 60 years with resistant acute myeloid leukemia: A prospective,multicenter phase II study

We assessed continuous infusion (CI) of fludarabine and cytarabine (FLAG) plus idarubicin for patients under 60‐years old with resistant acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Induction chemotherapy consisted of idarubicin (12 mg/m² iv infusion over 30 min on Days 1–3), plus fludarabine (30 mg/m2/day) and cytarabine (1,000 mg/m²/day) on Days 1–5 as a 24‐hr CI. G‐CSF was added on Days 1–5. The 29 patients enrolled were of median age 40 years (range, 18–57 years); of these, 8 (27.6%) had primary refractory disease, 19 (65.5%) were in early relapse, and 1 each (3.4%) was in multiple relapse and relapse after SCT. In response to induction, 8 patients (27.6%) achieved CR, 2 (6.9%) achieved CRp, and 19 (65.5%) failed treatment; of the latter, 14 had aplasia, three had an indeterminate course, and two showed resistance. Seven patients remain alive, while two were lost to follow‐up. Nineteen patients died, 14 of infection, one of toxicity during consolidation, three of relapse after SCT, and two of persistent disease. These findings indicate that although CI of FLAG plus idarubicin was effective for eradicating blasts, it carried a high risk of toxicity. Reduced doses are recommended for CI of FLAG plus idarubicin. Am. J. Hematol., 2009. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

REVEAL‐1, a phase 2 dose regimen optimization study of vosaroxin in older poor‐risk patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukaemia

This phase 2 study (N = 116) evaluated single‐agent vosaroxin, a first‐in‐class anticancer quinolone derivative, in patients ≥60 years of age with previously untreated unfavourable prognosis acute myeloid leukaemia. Dose regimen optimization was explored in sequential cohorts (A: 72 mg/m² d 1, 8, 15; B: 72 mg/m² d 1, 8; C: 72 mg/m² or 90 mg/m² d 1, 4). The primary endpoint was combined complete remission rate (complete remission [CR] plus CR with incomplete platelet recovery [CRp]). Common (>20%) grade ≥3 adverse events were thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, anaemia, neutropenia, sepsis, pneumonia, stomatitis and hypokalaemia. Overall CR and CR/CRp rates were 29% and 32%; median overall survival (OS) was 7·0 months; 1‐year OS was 34%. Schedule C (72 mg/m²) had the most favourable safety and efficacy profile, with faster haematological recovery (median 27 d) and lowest incidence of aggregate sepsis (24%) and 30‐d (7%) and 60‐d (17%) all‐cause mortality; at this dose and schedule, CR and CR/CRp rates were 31% and 35%, median OS was 7·7 months and 1‐year OS was 38%. Overall, vosaroxin resulted in low early mortality and an encouraging response rate; vosaroxin 72 mg/m² d 1, 4 is recommended for further study in this population. Registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov : #NCT00607997.     

No survival benefit associated with routine surveillance imaging for Hodgkin lymphoma in first remission: a Danish‐Swedish population‐based observational study

The use of routine imaging for patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) in complete remission (CR) is controversial. In a population‐based study, we examined the post‐remission survival of Danish and Swedish HL patients for whom follow‐up practices were different. Follow‐up in Denmark included routine imaging, usually for a minimum of 2 years, whereas clinical follow‐up without routine imaging was standard in Sweden. A total of 317 Danish and 454 Swedish comparable HL patients aged 18–65 years, diagnosed in the period 2007–2012 and having achieved CR following ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine)/BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone) therapy, were included in the study. The cumulative progression rates in the first 2 years were 4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1–7) for patients with stage I–II disease vs. 12% (95% CI 6–18) for patients with stage III–IV disease. An imaging‐based follow‐up practice was not associated with a better post‐remission survival in general (P = 0·2) or in stage‐specific subgroups (P = 0·5 for I–II and P = 0·4 for III–IV). Age ≥45 years was the only independent adverse prognostic factor for survival. In conclusion, relapse of HL patients with CR is infrequent and systematic use of routine imaging in these patients does not improve post‐remission survival. The present study supports clinical follow‐up without routine imaging, as encouraged by the recent Lugano classification.     

Primary treatment of leukemia relapses after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with reduced‐intensity conditioning second transplantation from the original donor

Acute leukemia relapsing after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has dismal outcome. Consecutive consenting patients (acute myeloid leukemia: N = 71; acute lymphoblastic leukemia: N = 37), at a median age of 37 (16–57) years, who had relapsed 7.9 (1.3–132) months post‐HSCT, were treated with three cytarabine‐based intensive regimens as reduced‐intensity conditioning (RIC), followed by infusion of mobilized HSC from the original donors. There were four treatment‐related mortalities (TRMs). Of 104 evaluable cases, 72 patients (67%) achieved complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi). The median overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was 11.6 months. The OS of patients achieving CR/CRi after the first RIC/HSCT was 18.8 months, as compared with 3.9 months for those not (P < 0.01). For 32 patients with nonremission, 11 received a repeat RIC‐HSCT, leading to CR/CRi in three cases. Therefore, 75/108 (69%) of patients achieved CR/CRi after one or two courses of RIC‐HSCT. Among CR/CRi patients, 48 cases relapsed again after 6.1 (1.0–64.4) months. Thirty cases received a repeat RIC‐HSCT, leading to CR/CRi in 22 patients. Multivariate analyses showed a significant impact of remission duration after initial HSCT (P = 0.026) and the presence of acute graft‐versus‐host disease after RIC‐HSCT (P = 0.011) on CR/CRi. RIC‐HSCT as primary treatment for acute leukemic relapses post‐HSCT induced a high CR rate with low TRM. Optimal postremission treatment remains to be defined. Am. J. Hematol. 88:485–491, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Phase II study of tosedostat with cytarabine or decitabine in newly diagnosed older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia or high‐risk MDS

Tosedostat, an oral aminopeptidase inhibitor, has synergy with cytarabine and hypomethylating agents. We performed a Phase II trial to determine rates of complete remission (CR) and survival using tosedostat with cytarabine or decitabine in older patients with untreated acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) or high‐risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Thirty‐four patients ≥60 years old (median age 70 years; range, 60–83) were randomized to receive tosedostat (120 mg on days 1–21 or 180 mg continuously) with 5 d of either cytarabine (1 g/m²/d) or decitabine (20 mg/m²/d) every 35 d. Twenty‐nine patients (85%) had AML, including 15 (44%) with secondary AML/MDS, and 5 (15%) had MDS‐refractory anaemia with excess blasts type 2. The CR/CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) rate was 53% [9 in each arm; 14 CR (41%) and 4 CRi (12%)], attained in 6 of 14 patients with adverse cytogenetics and 4 of 7 with FLT3‐internal tandem duplication mutations. Median follow‐up was 11·2 months (range, 0·5–22·3), and median survival was 11·5 months (95% confidence interval, 5·2–16·7). Twenty‐three patients (67·6%) were treated as outpatients and 10 of these patients required hospitalization for febrile neutropenia. No Grade 3–4 non‐haematological toxicities required withdrawal from study. Tosedostat with cytarabine or decitabine is tolerated in older patients with untreated AML/MDS, results in a CR/CRi rate of >50%, and warrants further study in larger trials.     

Monotherapy with pixantrone in histologically confirmed relapsed or refractory aggressive B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma: post‐hoc analyses from a phase III trial

This post hoc analysis of a phase 3 trial explored the effect of pixantrone in patients (50 pixantrone, 47 comparator) with relapsed or refractory aggressive B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) confirmed by centralized histological review. Patients received 28‐d cycles of 85 mg/m² pixantrone dimaleate (equivalent to 50 mg/m² in the approved formulation) on days 1, 8 and 15, or comparator. The population was subdivided according to previous rituximab use and whether they received the study treatment as 3rd or 4th line. Median number of cycles was 4 (range, 2–6) with pixantrone and 3 (2–6) with comparator. In 3rd or 4th line, pixantrone was associated with higher complete response (CR) (23·1% vs. 5·1% comparator, P = 0·047) and overall response rate (ORR, 43·6% vs. 12·8%, P = 0·005). In 3rd or 4th line with previous rituximab (20 pixantrone, 18 comparator), pixantrone produced better ORR (45·0% vs. 11·1%, P = 0·033), CR (30·0% vs. 5·6%, P = 0·093) and progression‐free survival (median 5·4 vs. 2·8 months, hazard ratio 0·52, 95% confidence interval 0·26–1·04) than the comparator. Similar results were found in patients without previous rituximab. There were no unexpected safety issues. Pixantrone monotherapy is more effective than comparator in relapsed or refractory aggressive B‐cell NHL in the 3rd or 4th line setting, independently of previous rituximab.     

Impact of early remission by induction therapy on allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia with an intermediate‐risk karyotype in first complete remission

For patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) early achievement of remission during induction treatment is an important predictor for long‐term outcome irrespective of the type of consolidation therapy employed. Here, we retrospectively examined the prognostic impact of early remission (ER) vs. delayed remission (DR) in a cohort of 132 AML patients with an intermediate‐risk karyotype undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) in first complete remission (CR1). In contrast to patients showing DR, patients achieving ER had a significantly higher 3‐yr overall survival (OS) and disease‐free survival (DFS) of 76% vs. 54% (P = 0.03) and 76% vs. 53% (P = 0.03). Likewise, 3 yr after alloSCT the cumulative incidence of relapse (CI‐R) was significantly lower in the ER subgroup as compared to patients achieving DR, that is, 10% vs. 35% (P = 0.004), whereas non‐relapse mortality (NRM) did not differ significantly. Multivariate analysis identified DR as an independent prognosticator for an inferior DFS (HR 3.37, P = 0.002) and a higher CI‐R (HR 3.55, P = 0.002). Taken together, these data may indicate that the rapid achievement of remission predicts a favorable outcome in patients with intermediate‐risk AML undergoing alloSCT in CR1. In turn, the adverse effect of DR may not be fully overcome by alloSCT.     

Results of conventional-dose cytosine arabinoside and idarubicin in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Summary Conventional-dose Ara-C (200 mg/m² d 1–5) combined with idarubicin (12 mg/m² d 1–3) was employed as remission induction and consolidation therapy in 23 elderly AML patients with a median age of 66 years (range, 60–75) with AML according to the FAB criteria (M1n=3, M2n=10, M4n=6, M5n=2, M6n=2), eligible for the study. In seven patients earlier MDS had been documented by previous bone marrow aspirates. The CR rate after one induction course was 65% (15/23). Toxicity was acceptable, with four patients dying during the chemotherapy-induced hypoplasia (4/23). Although 80% of the CR patients received two additional cycles of Ara-C and idarubicin as consolidation therapy, only two patients are still in continuous complete remission more than 12 months after achieving CR. The median disease-free survival of the CR patients was 11.5 months and the median survival of the entire group was 10 months. We conclude that conventional dose Ara-C/idarubicin is an effective protocol for inducing complete remission in elderly patients with AML, but that consolidation therapy consisting of two courses of the same regimen does not produce a relevant rate of long-term disease-free survival.     

Venetoclax and hypomethylating agents in acute myeloid leukemia: Mayo Clinic series on 86 patients

Venetoclax and hypomethylating agent (HMA) combination therapy is FDA-approved for elderly or unfit acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients unable to withstand intensive chemotherapy. The primary objective of the current study was to impart our institutional experience with the above regimen, outlining response, survival outcomes, and its determinants amongst 86 treatment- naïve and relapsed/refractory AML patients. A total of 44 treatment-naïve AML patients, median age 73.5 years, enriched with secondary, therapy related and ELN adverse risk disease (n = 27) were studied. The CR/CRi rates of 50% (22 of 44 patients) were superior to 23% in a matched AML cohort treated with HMA alone (P = .005). Response rates were similar with TP53, FLT3, NPM1 and IDH mutations (P = .31). Moreover, CEPBA mutations (P = .03) and neutropenia (P = .05) emerged as predictors of complete response. Survivalwas prolonged in patients achieving CR/CRi (17 vs 3 months without CR/CRi, P < .001; conversely adverse ELN risk portended inferior survival. Amongst 42 relapsed/refractory AML patients, half received ≥2 prior therapies excluding transplant, and 15 (35.7%) had received HMA. A group of 14 patients (33.3%) attained CR/CRi; age > 65 years, AML with myelodysplasia, JAK2, DNMT3A, and BCOR mutations predicted complete response. Survival distinctions were based on CR/CRi (median survival 15 vs 3 months with/without CR/CRi; P < .001), and TP53 mutation status (P = .04). In summary, we corroborate existing reports demonstrating superior response and prolonged survival with venetoclax and HMA in treatment -naïve and relapsed/refractory AML patients regardless of genotype. Additionally, we identify unique predictors of response to therapy which require validation.     

Phase II study of targeted therapy with temozolomide in acute myeloid leukaemia and high‐risk myelodysplastic syndrome patients pre‐screened for low O6‐methylguanine DNA methyltransferase expression

Resistance to temozolomide is largely mediated by the DNA repair enzyme O⁶‐methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT). We conducted a prospective multicentre study of patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) or high‐risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who were not candidates for intensive therapy. Patient selection was based on MGMT expression by Western blot. Patients with MGMT:ACTB (β‐actin) ratio <0·2 were eligible to receive temozolomide 200 mg/m²/d ×7 d. Patients achieving a complete response (CR) could receive up to 12 monthly cycles of temozolomide ×5/28 d. Of 166 patients screened, 81 (49%) demonstrated low MGMT expression; 45 of these were treated with temozolomide. The overall response rate was 53%; 36% achieved complete clearance of blasts, with 27% achieving a CR/CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp). Factors associated with a trend toward a higher response rate included MDS, methylated MGMT promoter and standard cytogenetic risk group. Induction and post‐remission cycles were well‐tolerated and most patients were treated on an outpatient basis. Patient who achieved CR/CRp had a superior overall survival compared to partial or non‐responders. In conclusion, targeted therapy based on pre‐selection for low MGMT expression was associated with a higher response rate to temozolomide compared to previous reports of unselected patients.     

Outcomes of previously untreated elderly patients with AML: a propensity score-matched comparison of clofarabine vs. FLAG

The 5-year overall survival (OS) in patients ≥?60 years old with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains <?10%. Clofarabine-based induction (CLO) provides an alternative to low-intensity therapy (LIT) and palliative care for this population, but supporting data are conflicted. Recently, our institution adopted the FLAG regimen (fludarabine, cytarabine, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) based on data reporting similar outcomes to CLO in elderly patients with AML unable to tolerate anthracycline-based induction. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of patients ≥?60 years old with AML treated with FLAG or CLO over the past 10 years. We performed a propensity score match that provided 32 patients in each group. Patients treated with FLAG had a higher CR/CRi rate (65.6 vs. 37.5%, P?=?0.045) and OS (7.9 vs. 2.8 months, P?=?0.085) compared to CLO. Furthermore, FLAG was better tolerated with significantly less grade 3/4 toxicities and a shorter duration of neutropenia (18.5 vs. 30 days, P?=?0.002). Finally, we performed a cost analysis that estimated savings to be $30,000–45,000 per induction with FLAG. Our study supports the use of FLAG both financially and as an effective, well-tolerated high-dose treatment regimen for elderly patients with AML. No cases of cerebellar neurotoxicity occurred.     

A randomized phase II study of standard‐dose versus high‐dose rituximab with BEAM in autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed aggressive B‐cell non‐hodgkin lymphomas: long term results

High‐dose rituximab (HD‐R) combined with carmustine, cytarabine, etoposide and melphalan (BEAM) and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) was effective and tolerable in a single‐arm prospective study of relapsed aggressive B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (R‐NHL). We performed a randomized phase 2 study comparing HD‐R versus standard‐dose rituximab (SD‐R) in R‐NHL. Ninety‐three patients were randomized to HD‐R (1000 mg/m²) (n = 42) or SD‐R (375 mg/m²) (n = 51) administered on post‐transplant days +1 and +8, using a Bayesian adaptive algorithm. The 2 treatment arms were balanced in regards to patient demographic and clinical characteristics. At a median follow‐up of 7·92 years, the 5‐year disease‐free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 40% and 48%, respectively. We found no statistically significant differences between HD‐R and SD‐R in 5‐year DFS (36% vs. 43%; P = 0·205) and OS (43% vs. 52%; P = 0·392). In multivariate analyses, only disease status before ASCT [residual disease versus complete remission (CR)] (hazard ratio [HR] 1·79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1·08–2·95) and number of prior treatments received (>2 vs. ≤2 lines of treatment) (HR 1·89, 95% CI: 1·13–3·18) were associated with worse DFS and OS. Patients who had SCT while in CR or who received ≤2 lines of treatment prior to SCT had better 5‐year OS (57% vs. 35%; P = 0·02 and 54% vs. 30%, P = 0·001, respectively) in both arms. No differences in engraftments or adverse events were noted in the 2 arms. When combined with BEAM and ASCT in relapsed aggressive B‐cell NHL, HD‐R provided no DFS or OS advantage over SD‐R. In patients who have been exposed to rituximab in the frontline or salvage setting, the addition of rituximab in the peri‐transplant setting remains controversial.     

Meta‐analysis of inoperable pancreatic cancer: gemcitabine combined with cisplatin versus gemcitabine alone

OBJECTIVES: To compare the therapeutic effects of gemcitabine (GEM) monotherapy with GEM‐cisplatin (DDP) combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced stage pancreatic cancer (APCa) through meta‐analysis. METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE searches were supplemented by information from trial registers of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for GEM‐DDP combination chemotherapy and GEM alone in APCa. A quantitative meta‐analysis using updated information based on inclusion criteria from all available RCTs was carried out by two reviewers. The primary meta‐analysis involved the overall survival (OS), objective remission rate (ORR) and toxicity. RESULTS: The meta‐analysis included six RCTs. There was no significant advantage for the GEM‐DDP combination group in 6‐month survival rate (P = 0.24) or clinical benefit rate (P = 0.58). There was a marginal significant improvement for the GEM‐DDP combination group in ORR (RD = 6%, P = 0.05; RD, risk difference = risk in the GEM‐DDP combination group – risk in the GEM alone group). Moreover, there was a significant improvement for the combination group in 6‐month TTP/TTF (RD = 9%, P = 0.02). WHO grade 3–4 toxicity was higher for the GEM‐DDP combination group in terms of neutropenia (RD = 6%, P = 0.08), thrombocytopenia (RD = 8%, P = 0.17) and vomiting/nausea (RD = 11%, P = 0.07); none reached significant difference. CONCLUSION: GEM‐DDP combination should not be recommended and GEM monotherapy remains the standard treatment for patients with APCa.     

Long‐term follow‐up of patients receiving allogeneic stem cell transplant for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: mixed T‐cell chimerism is associated with high relapse risk and inferior survival

There is limited information regarding the immunological predictors of post‐allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) outcome in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), such as mixed T‐cell chimerism. We analysed 143 consecutive patients with relapsed/refractory CLL, transplanted between 2000 and 2012, to determine the prognostic relevance of mixed chimerism post‐alloSCT and the ability of post‐transplant immunomodulation to treat relapse. Mixed T‐cell chimerism occurred in 50% of patients at 3 months and 43% at 6 months post‐alloSCT; upon 3‐ and 6‐month landmark analysis, this was associated with inferior progression‐free survival (PFS) [Hazard ratio (HR) 1·93, P = 0·003 and HR 2·58, P < 0·001] and survival (HR 1·66, P = 0·05 and HR 2·17, P < 0·001), independent of baseline patient characteristics, and a lower rate of grade II–IV acute graft‐versus‐host disease (GHVD) (16% vs. 52%, P < 0·001). Thirty‐three patients were treated with immunomodulation for relapse post‐alloSCT (immunosuppression withdrawal, n = 6, donor lymphocyte infusion, n = 27); 17 achieved complete response (CR), which predicted superior PFS (53 months vs. 10 months, P < 0·001) and survival (117 months vs. 30 months, P = 0·006). Relapsed patients with mixed chimerism had inferior response to immunomodulation; conversion to full donor chimerism was highly correlated both with CR and with the development of severe acute GVHD, which was fatal in 3/8 patients. Novel therapeutic strategies are required for patients with mixed T‐cell chimerism post‐alloSCT for CLL.     

Phase II study of methotrexate,vincristine, pegylated‐asparaginase,and dexamethasone (MOpAD) in patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Newer approaches are needed for the treatment of relapsed and refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Asparaginase‐based regimens are active in the treatment of pediatric ALL and may be important in salvage therapy for adult patients. We conducted a pilot trial combining methotrexate, vincristine, PEGylated‐asparaginase, and dexamethasone (MOpAD) in adults with relapsed or refractory ALL. We added tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) ALL and rituximab in patients with CD20 positive B‐cell ALL. Among 37 patients treated (median age 42 years; median 2 prior therapies), the complete remission (CR) rate was 28% and an overall response rate (ORR) was 39%. The median CR duration was 4.3 months. Patients with Ph+ ALL had CR and ORR of 50% and 67%, respectively and the CR and ORR in patients with T‐cell leukemia were 45% and 56%, respectively. The median survival in patients with CR/CRp was 10.4 versus 3.4 months in nonresponders (P = 0.02). The most common grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicities were elevations in bilirubin and transaminases, nausea, peripheral neuropathy, and hyperglycemia, which were managed with supportive care, dose adjustments, and interruptions. Am. J. Hematol. 90:120–124, 2015. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Autologous stem cell transplantation in first complete remission may not extend progression‐free survival in patients with peripheral T cell lymphomas

Patients with peripheral T cell lymphomas (PTCL) generally have a poor prognosis when treated with conventional chemotherapy. Consolidation with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has been reported to improve progression‐free survival. However, these studies have not compared consolidative ASCT with active observation in patients with PTCL achieving first complete remission (CR1) following induction chemotherapy. We conducted a retrospective analysis of PTCL patients treated at the University of Pennsylvania between 1/1/2007 and 12/31/2014. Patients with cutaneous T cell lymphoma, concurrent B cell lymphomas, and anaplastic lymphoma kinase‐positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALK‐positive ALCL) were excluded from the study. We compared progression‐free survival for patients who underwent ASCT in CR1 following CHOP‐like induction regimens and patients who underwent active observation during CR1. 48 patients met all inclusion and exclusion criteria and underwent either active observation (28 patients) or consolidative ASCT (20 patients) in CR1. The 1‐year cumulative incidence of relapse in the observation and ASCT groups was 50% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 30–67%) and 46% (95% CI: 23–67%), respectively (P = 0.55). Median progression‐free survival in the observation and ASCT groups was 15.8 and 12.8 months, respectively (log rank, P = 0.79). Estimated 3‐year progression‐free survival in the observation and ASCT groups was 37 and 41%, respectively. In conclusion, for PTCL patients achieving CR1 following CHOP‐like induction chemotherapy, ASCT does not appear to improve progression‐free survival compared to active observation. This finding should be confirmed in a larger, prospective study. Am. J. Hematol. 91:672–676, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Azacitidine and low‐dose cytarabine in palliative patients with acute myeloid leukemia and high bone marrow blast counts – a retrospective single‐center experience

We retrospectively analyzed and compared the efficacy and toxicity of azacitidine (AZA) and low‐dose cytarabine (LD‐Ara‐C) in 65 palliative patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) showing high bone marrow blast counts (≥30%) before start of treatment. Twenty‐seven and 38 patients received AZA and LD‐Ara‐C, respectively. The median patient age was 71 yr. Patient and disease characteristics did not differ between the treatment groups, except for BM blast counts, and peripheral leukocyte and blast counts which were significantly higher in the LD‐Ara‐C group. AZA and LD‐Ara‐C were first‐line treatment in 12 (44%) and 17 patients (45%), respectively. Response and hematologic improvement rates were low and similar in both treatment groups. In both treatment groups, most common non‐hematologic toxicities included febrile neutropenia, pneumonia, and bleedings without significant differences regarding frequencies. Estimated 1‐yr survival rates were 15% (95% CI 8–22) and 13% (95% CI 7–19) in the AZA and LD‐Ara‐C groups, respectively, without statistically significant difference. In multivariate analysis (n = 65), previous treatment (HR 2.27, 95% CI 1.00–5.22, P = 0.05) and adverse cytogenetics (HR 2.50, 95% CI 1.20–5.22, P = 0.02) were independent predictors of poor survival. In our center and within the limitations of a retrospective study, both treatment regimens showed similar but limited efficacy in palliative patients with AML and high BM blast counts.