Conversion to open repair after endografting for abdominal aortic aneurysm: causes, incidence and results.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate frequency, causes and results of conversion to Open repair (OR) after endovascular repair (EVAR) in a single centre during an 8-year period. DESIGN: Six hundred and forty-nine consecutive patients undergoing EVAR were followed up prospectively for endograft-related complications. OUTCOMES: Early conversion was any OR during or within 30 days from the primary EVAR. Late conversion was any OR with removal of the endograft after 30 days since a completed EVAR procedure. RESULTS: Median patient follow-up was 38 months (1-93 months). Conversion to OR was performed in 38 patients; nine early and 29 late. Most (7/9) early conversions were due to extensive vessel calcification. Peri-operative mortality was 22% (2/9). Late conversions occurred at a median of 33 months after primary EVAR: 29 were elective and 4 urgent. During the same interval, 79 secondary endovascular interventions were performed, 7 of which failed. The risk of conversion to OR was 9% at 6 years. At multivariate logistic regression analysis, no single factor (short, large or angulated neck, suprarenal fixation, large pre-operative diameter, iliac aneurysms, ASA score risk) was associated with the risk of late failure requiring conversion to OR. CONCLUSION: The risk of death after early conversion should be recognized, to avoid forcing morphological indications for primary EVAR. Occurrence of late conversion after EVAR is not negligible, affecting almost 1 out of 10 patients after 6 years. In the presence of an expanding aneurysm after EVAR, especially after a failed secondary endovascular correction, an aggressive attitude in fit patients allows outcomes at similar to those of primary OR.     

Long-term durability of open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE: In multiple comparisons of open vs endovascular (EVAR) repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms, the prior assumption that open repair produced superior durability has been challenged by advocates of EVAR. Although focus on EVAR reintervention has been intense, few contemporary studies document late outcomes after open repair; this was the goal of this study. METHODS: From January 1994 to December 1998 (chosen to ensure a minimum 5-year follow-up), 540 patients underwent elective open repair. Surveillance imaging (computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging scans) was obtained for 152 (57%) of the 269 patients who remained alive at a mean follow-up of 87 months. Study end points included freedom from graft-related interventions and aneurysm-related and overall survival (Kaplan-Meier test); factors predictive of these end points were determined by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The mean age at operation was 73 years. A total of 76% of patients were male; 11% had renal insufficiency (creatinine > or =1.5 mg/dL), and 13% had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The aortic cross-clamp position was suprarenal in 135 (25%) patients, and 284 (53%) of patients had bifurcated grafts placed. Operative mortality (30 days) was 3%, and the median length of hospital stay was 7 days. Postoperative complications occurred in 68 (13%) patients. Predictors of postoperative complications included a history of myocardial infarction (hazard ratio [HR], 2.0; P = .01) and renal insufficiency (HR, 2.5; P = .02). The mean follow-up for all patients was 87 months. Actuarial survival was 70.7% +/- 2% and 44.3% +/- 2.4% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Negative predictors of long-term survival included advanced age (HR, 1.1; P < .001), history of myocardial infarction (HR, 1.37; P = .02), and renal insufficiency (HR, 1.5; P = .04). Freedom from graft-related reintervention was 98.2% +/- 0.8% and 94.3% +/- 3.4% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. There were 13 late graft-related complications in 11 (2%) patients (mean follow-up, 7.2 years). Findings included seven anastomotic pseudoaneurysms (five were repaired), four graft limb occlusions, and two graft infections. Aneurysms were identified in noncontiguous arterial segments in 68 (45%) of 152 patients, most of which involved the iliac arteries and required no treatment because of small size. Late aortic aneurysms proximal to the repair were identified in 24% of patients, and 29 (19%) patients had multiple late synchronous aneurysms. CONCLUSIONS: Open repair remains a safe and durable option for the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms, with an excellent associated 10-year survival in patients who undergo operation at 75 years of age or younger. In addition, the freedom from graft-related reintervention is superior to that of EVAR. Finally, continued surveillance after open repair is appropriate and should be directed toward the detection of other aneurysms.     

Simultaneous endovascular exclusion of thoracic aortic aneurysm with open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of aneurysms at multiple sites within the aorta is problematic. METHODS: Between March 2002 and June 2003 in the Department of General, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw six patients with coexisting abdominal and descending thoracic aortic aneurysms underwent simultaneous open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair and endoluminal thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) repair. The indication for a combined procedure was a diagnosed descending TAA and AAA with no significant risk factors for open aortic surgery or technical contraindications for endovascular treatment of TAA. RESULTS: One patient died in the peri-operative period while the other five patients all recovered well after surgery and were discharged with both aneurysms excluded. CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment of TAA combined with a simultaneous open AAA repair is an efficient and relatively safe treatment modality in patients with TAA and AAA disqualified from endovascular repair. The fact that thoracotomy is not a necessity significantly lowers the complication rate in these patients.     

Dissected thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair with modified parallel endografting

A 67-year-old woman with a prior history of aortic dissection was admitted for enlarging the thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA). She has received multiple treatments including Bentall procedure, hemiarch replacement, and subsequent endovascular procedures for the closure of re-entry. Preoperative computed tomography revealed previously implanted thoracic endograft from distal arch to superior mesenteric artery with dissected TAAA measuring up to 70 mm in diameter. Re-entry was observed at bilateral common iliac arteries. The patient was successfully treated by endovascular treatment using a fenestrated stent graft to obtain a landing zone for parallel endograft technique to the iliac arteries for the closure of re-entry.     

Symptomatic seroma after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Seroma following open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair has rarely been described. The majority of cases in the literature have been associated with use of polytetrafluoroethylene grafts. Here, we present a patient with a very large, symptomatic periaortic graft seroma 10 years after conventional (open) repair. The etiology of such seromas is of significant interest in endovascular aortic repair.     

Endovascular aneurysm repair is associated with less malnutrition than open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Background

Patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair have high rates of postoperative malnutrition. We examined whether endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is associated with reduced postoperative malnutrition compared with open AAA repair.

Methods

The records of patients undergoing AAA repair in the Veterans Affairs (VA) Connecticut Healthcare System were reviewed. Primary outcomes were 30-day morbidity, lengths of hospitalization and intensive care unit stay, duration of intubation, and nutritional risk index scores.

Results

Sixty-two patients were included (open repair, 37; EVAR, 25). Nutritional parameters were comparable between groups before surgery. Patients treated with EVAR had improved postoperative nutritional profiles as determined by albumin level (3.7 ± .08 vs 3.2 ± .12; P = .003), and nutritional risk index (97.9 ± 1.3 vs 88.9 ± 1.8; P = .0006), compared with patients treated with open repair.

Conclusions

Patients undergoing EVAR developed significantly less postoperative malnutrition compared with those having open repair. EVAR may be a strategy to avoid malnutrition and improve outcomes in patients at risk for malnutrition after undergoing AAA repair.     

Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: 5-year follow-up results

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) offers a minimally invasive alternative to open repair and has the benefits of reduced perioperative morbidity and mortality. There are potential complications specific to EVAR, including device failure, graft migration, and endoleak, which necessitate long-term follow-up. This remains a relatively novel technique, and therefore, little long-term data exist. This study reports 5-year EVAR outcome data from a single center. Five-year follow-up data for 58 patients at a single center who underwent EVAR using a variety of different commercial devices was reviewed. All patients were followed up with 6-monthly duplex ultrasound scanning and clinical assessment in a nurse-led clinic, in addition to yearly computed tomographic (CT) scans for those participating in the EVAR trial. All patients in this series were male, with a median age of 72 years (range 58-81). Mean preoperative aortic diameter was 5.95 cm, and this reduced following EVAR to 5.2 cm (mean diameter) at 5 years. Mean hospital stay was 7 days, and there were no perioperative deaths. There were 20 (34%) early and 15 (26%) late complications. There were 13 endoleaks confirmed on CT; four (31%) were type I and nine (69%) were type II. All-cause mortality was 26%. There were no late aneurysm-related deaths. EVAR has the advantages of shorter hospital stay and reduced perioperative morbidity and mortality. Long-term follow-up remains a priority following aortic stenting in order to detect late complications such as endoleak.     

Durability of open repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm: a 15-year follow-up study.

PURPOSE: This study reviewed the long-term outcome of patients who underwent open repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). METHODS: A retrospective study of 208 patients (188 men and 20 women) with a mean age of 65.6 years who survived elective or emergency open repair of an infrarenal AAA was conducted at a university referral hospital. Main outcome measures included late graft-related complications, survival free from any reintervention, survival free from any vascular reintervention, and overall survival rates. RESULTS: Late graft-related complications occurred in 32 patients (15.4%). A proximal para-anastomotic pseudoaneurysm developed in six patients (2.9%), and a distal pseudoaneurysm developed in 18 patients (8.7%); in seven of these cases (3.4%), it was bilateral or recurrent. A graft limb occlusion occurred in 11 patients (5.3%). These complications required 37 surgical or other invasive procedures in 27 patients (13.0%). Thirty-one vascular and/or endovascular reoperations were performed. The 5-year, 10-year, and 15-year survival free from any reintervention rates were 91.5%, 86.2%, and 72.0%, respectively. At the same intervals, the survival free from any vascular reintervention rates were 93.8%, 88.5%, and 73.9%, respectively, and the overall survival rates were 66.8%, 39.4%, and 18.0%, respectively. Complications associated with a ruptured femoral artery pseudoaneurysm, a ruptured aortic pseudoaneurysm, an aortoduodenal fistula, and the elective repair of a femoral pseudoaneurysm were the graft-related causes of death, which occurred in four patients (1.9%). Age (P <.0001) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P =.002) were shown by means of multivariate analysis to be predictive of poor survival outcome, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P =.02) and lower limb ischemia (P =.04) were shown to be associated with an increased need for vascular reinterventions to treat graft-related complications. CONCLUSION: Open repair of infrarenal AAAs can achieve satisfactory 15-year follow-up rates of survival free from reintervention for any graft-related complications, suggesting that surgery should still be considered the procedure of choice for infrarenal AAAs, at least in patients who are fit for surgery.     

Five-year interim comparison of the Guidant bifurcated endograft with open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to compare 1-year and 5-year results of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with the Guidant/EVT bifurcated graft system with results of open repair. METHODS: This was a prospective, nonrandomized, concurrent controlled study that compared results of endovascular versus open repair of AAA. The Phase II study with the EGS delivery system included 268 patients in 18 US medical centers; and the Phase III trial with the Ancure delivery system incuded 305 patients in 21 US institutions. Data were internally and externally audited and subjected to periodic review by the US Food and Drug Administration. The control group of 111 patients were excluded from endovascular repair with a tube graft because of anatomic considerations, but were otherwise comparable to the experimental group. Patients in the control group underwent conventional open surgical repair concurrently with patients who underwent EGS repair in 18 US institutions. RESULTS: Five hundred thirty-one of 573 patients (92.7%) underwent successful implantation of the Guidant/EVT bifurcated endograft. The combined major morbidity and mortality in the endograft group was 28.8%, compared with 44.1% in the open control group. Additional benefits in the endograft group included shorter hospital stay (2 days vs 6 days), less surgical blood loss (400 mL vs 800 mL), and less intensive care unit use (33% vs 94%). These early results are reported on an intent-to-treat basis; in all patients an attempt was made to treat with the endovascular graft, including those patients in whom conversion to standard open repair was necessary during the primary procedure. Three hundred nineteen patients were selected for long-term follow-up to 5 years, on the basis of date of implantation; ie, patients with the earliest implantations were followed up for 5 years. The primary purpose of long-term follow-up was to obtain data on long-term efficacy of the graft; thus only patients in whom implantation was successful were selected. No patient has experienced an aneurysm rupture to date. Survival (Kaplan- Meier method) in the experimental group was 68.1%, compared with 77.2% in the control group (P = NS). At 60 months, 74.4% of patients (32 of 43) were free of endoleak. There were no type I or type III endoleaks remaining. Aneurysm sac diameter decreased or remained stable in 97.6% of patients (41 of 42) and increased in only 1 patient. During the course of long-term follow-up, post-procedural conversion to open repair was required in only 9 patients (2.8%). CONCLUSION: The EVT/Guidant bifurcated graft is effective in preventing AAA rupture, and long-term survival is comparable to that with open repair.     

Functional outcome after open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm

INTRODUCTION: Detailed information on functional outcome after open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair is sparse. Information about functional outcome of open AAA repair is essential to allow comparison of treatment modalities. METHODS: To determine the functional outcome of patients after open repair of AAA, we reviewed 154 consecutive, nonemergency open repairs of infrarenal AAAs between 1990 and 1997 and each patient's medical records. Clinical variables were recorded for each patient, as were multiple outcomes, including ambulatory status, independent living status, current medical condition, and the patient's perception of recovery and satisfaction. Eighty-seven patients or their families were available for current telephone interview to obtain information about objective functional activities, including walking and driving, and subjective functional information, including assessment of complete recovery and willingness to undergo AAA repair again. Chart data were available for all 154 patients. RESULTS: There were 42 women and 112 men. A total of 139 operations were elective, and 15 were urgent. The operative mortality rate was 4%, mean hospital stay was 10.7 +/- 1.3 days, and mean intensive care unit stay was 4.57 +/- 1.17 days. Seventeen (11%) patients required transfer to a skilled nursing facility with a mean stay of 3.66 +/- 2.9 months. All patients were ambulatory preoperatively, whereas at last follow-up (median, 25 months; range, 0.13-108.5 months), 100 (64%) of the patients remained ambulatory, 34 (22%) required assistance, and 12 (14%) were nonambulatory. At current assessment by telephone interview, 33% of patients described a decrease in their functional activity including driving, shopping, and traveling compared with their preoperative status, whereas 67% were unchanged. When asked to assess their own degree of recovery, 64% of patients stated that they experienced complete recovery with an average time to recovery of 3.9 months, whereas 33% said they had not fully recovered at a mean follow-up of 34 months. Sixteen (18%) patients said they would not undergo AAA repair again knowing the recovery process, even though they appeared to fully understand the implication of AAA rupture. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing open AAA repair generally experienced significant freedom from surgical complications. However, substantial functional impairment was present. It is unclear whether the functional disability resulted from the AAA surgery or from aging and comorbidities unrelated to surgery.     

Complications and reintervention following elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a 10-year retrospective analysis

INTRODUCTION

Recent data have shown higher rates of graft related complication or reintervention in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair compared with open aneurysm surgery (OAS). However, there are fewer data available regarding procedure related reinterventions following OAS. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of procedure related complications and reintervention following elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the dedicated Portsmouth POSSUM database. Data from 361 patients (median age: 72 years, 91.4% male) who underwent elective OAS between 1993 and 2004 were analysed. The incidences of early and late complications and subsequent reintervention were investigated.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 10 years 4 months (range: 5 years - 16 years 4 months). There were 52 reinterventions in the follow-up period. Of these, 34.6% were for incisional hernias or small bowel obstruction with the majority of the remaining laparotomies performed for bleeding or distal ischaemic complications. Almost two-thirds (63.5%) of reinterventions occurred in the first 30 days. There were 30 emergency readmissions to the acute surgical wards that did not require reintervention.

CONCLUSIONS

OAS carries a significant reintervention rate. In this study, 54% of reinterventions were directly related to laparotomy.     

A comparison of 50 initial endoluminal endograft repairs for abdominal aortic aneurysm with 50 concurrent open repairs

PURPOSE: To review the results of our initial experience with endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with respect to morbidity and mortality and to compare these outcomes with those of transabdominal repair. METHODS: We reviewed the first 50 consecutive endovascular AAA repairs performed at our institution from November 1999 to January 2002. Pre-operative risk factors, intraoperative variables and post-operative outcomes were assessed. All endovascular patients were followed with periodic examination, contrast-enhanced computed tomography and/or duplex scanning. Comparison was made to 50 patients undergoing standard open repair over a similar time period. RESULTS: Fifty patients underwent endovascular AAA repair (mean age 72.5, AAA size 5.5 cm). Endovascular devices employed were manufactured by Ancure (Guidant Corp.), and AneuRx (Medtronic). Preoperative risk factors were similar to patients undergoing transabdominal repair. Mean operative time was 169 minutes and estimated blood loss was 450cc with average blood replacement of.18 units. Median ICU stay was 0 days and mean hospital stay was 2.3 nights. There were no conversions to open repair, however there was one aborted endovascular attempt. Morbidity included MI (2%), colon ischemia (1%), acute renal insufficiency (4%) and leg ischemia (4%). There was one death within 30 days. Seven endoleaks were identified (6 type II and 1 type I) and were managed angiographically. CONCLUSIONS: The short-term surgical morbidity and mortality rates for endovascular repair of AAA are acceptably low and are comparable to the transabdominal approach.     

Endoleaks following conventional open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: to describe the complication of following conventional open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. DESIGN: prospective case study. SETTING: two specialist vascular surgical centres. PATIENTS AND METHODS: six patients who had successful conventional open AAA repair. RESULTS: six patients presented with back or abdominal pain or hypotension between one and eighteen months later. An endoleak at the distal anastomosis was noted in five of the cases and one endoleak at the proximal anastomosis. All six cases were successfully repaired; two of these patients required Dacron graft replacement, whilst in four cases only direct resuturing was needed. There was no evidence of infection. CONCLUSIONS: an endoleak is not a phenomenon confined to stent grafts. It should be considered in all patients who present with back or abdominal pain within eighteen months of open AAA repair. The combination of computed tomography (CT) scan and digital subtraction angiography is most useful for preoperative diagnosis.     

腹主动脉瘤血管腔内治疗与开放手术治疗的疗效比较

目的 比较腹主动脉瘤血管腔内治疗与开放手术治疗的近期疗效。方法 对34例肾下型腹主动脉瘤患者的临床资料进行分析，比较腔内治疗组（15例）与传统开放手术治疗组（19例）的术前状况、手术相关情况、术后并发症、死亡率及手术前后的实验室检查数据。结果 腔内组术中出血量和输血量明显少于手术组（P=0．005、P=0．015），腔内组术后平均禁食时间和平均住院时间较手术组明显缩短（P〈0．0l、P：0．001）。手术组术后并发症发生率明显高于腔内组（P〈0．01）。术后第3天白细胞计数腔内组明显低于手术组（P=0．020）；术后第5天红细胞计数及血肌酐水平在腔内组均明显高于手术组（P=0．011、P=0．034）。结论 腹主动脉瘤血管腔内治疗具有安全、微创、对人体内环境干扰小的优点，近期疗效较传统开放手术好。