Role of HLA compatibility in pediatric living-related liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching is, at present, not used for the allocation of cadaveric hepatic allografts because the liver is generally believed to be less susceptible to HLA-mediated rejection. However, the exact role of HLA compatibility in the long-term outcome of liver transplantation is not yet clearly defined. One of the advantages of living-related liver transplantation (LRLT) could be a better histocompatibility between donor and recipient. This study aimed at an assessment of the influence of HLA compatibility in a large series of LRLTs. METHODS: A total of 321 pediatric patients who underwent ABO-identical or ABO-compatible primary LRLT from the parental donors in the period between June 1990 and August 2000 were involved in the study. Graft survival, rejection episodes, and immunosuppression were evaluated from the viewpoint of HLA compatibility. RESULTS: The overall 1- and 5-year graft survivals were 85.7% and 84.1%, respectively. The cumulative 5-year graft survivals in HLA 0-, 1-, 2- and 3-mismatch groups (A, B, and DR) were 100% (n=10), 78.9% (n=19), 86.2% (n=87), and 82.9% (n=205), respectively (P=0.525). The overall incidence of rejection during the follow-up period (median 66 months, range 16-139 months) was 46.1%. No significant difference was found in the incidence of rejection and rejection-free survival among the four groups. However, steroid-resistant rejection that necessitated OKT3 treatment (n=6) and chronic rejection (n=2) were recognized only in the 3-mismatch group. The whole-blood trough level of tacrolimus and the duration of steroid administration were not significantly different among the groups. The rate of the patients who succeeded in withdrawal from immunosuppression was also similar among the groups. However, the trough level of tacrolimus needed for maintenance of an acceptable liver function test during the chronic phase tended to be lower in well-matched pairs, and a high percentage of immunosuppressant-free patients were found in the 0-mismatch group. Fatal graft-versus-host disease developed in one patient with a complete one-way HLA-matched transplant. CONCLUSION: We could not find any supportive evidence of beneficial effects of HLA-matching in pediatric LRLT. The potential benefit of HLA-matching for the reduction protocol for immunosuppressants may play a role in the withdrawal program. It appears unnecessary to pay attention to HLA compatibility in donor selection in LRLT, except for one-way HLA matching, or to adjust immunosuppression according to HLA compatibility.     

Flow cytometry-detected IgG is not a contraindication to renal transplantation: IgM may be beneficial to outcome

BACKGROUND: At our transplant center, primary recipients of either a haplo-identical (haplo-ID) living related (LRD) or a cadaveric (CAD) donor renal allograft are transplanted after a negative donor-specific IgG anti-human globulin (AHG) cross-match (XM). Testing included the historically highest panel-reactive antibody and the immediate (0-7 days) pretransplant sera. A positive donor specific IgM-AHG XM has not been a contraindication to transplant. Reports suggest that donor-specific flow cytometry cross-matches (FCXM) may be more clinically informative than the AHG-XM. METHODS: We therefore evaluated the impact of a positive FCXM (IgG or IgM) on the rejection frequency (0-12 months after transplant) and 1-year graft survival for cyclosporine-prednisone-treated primary (haplo-ID and CAD) renal allograft recipients. All transplants were performed after a negative donor-specific IgG AHG-XM regardless of the IgM-AHG XM status. RESULTS: Rejection frequencies (26% vs. 31%, P = NS) and 1-year graft survivals (92% vs. 89%, P = NS) were comparable for haplo-ID LRD FCXM-negative and IgG-FCXM-positive recipients. However, IgM-FCXM-positive LRD recipients experienced significantly fewer rejections (13% vs. 26% P<0.02) and an improved 1-year graft survival (100% vs. 92%, P<0.02) than FCXM-negative LRD recipients. Similar results were observed for primary CAD recipients. Rejection frequencies (40% vs. 44%, P = NS) and 1-year graft survivals (83% vs. 81%, P = NS) were comparable for primary CAD FCXM-negative and IgG-FCXM-positive recipients. Again, IgM-FCXM-positive primary CAD recipients experienced significantly fewer rejections (22% vs. 40%, P<0.02) and improved 1-year graft survivals (89% vs. 83%, P<0.05) than FCXM-negative recipients. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that, after a negative donor-specific IgG-AHG XM, an IgG-positive FCXM is not a contraindication to transplantation. The presence of IgM may be beneficial in reducing the occurrence of rejection episodes and improving graft survivals.     

Renal allograft outcomes in African American versus Caucasian transplant recipients in the tacrolimus era

METHODS: Between January 1995 and December 1999, 185 kidney transplants were performed with tacrolimus (TAC)-based immunosuppression including 120 African American (AA, 65%) and 65 Caucasian recipients (C, 35%). Mean follow-up was 34 months. The AA group was characterized by a higher incidence of renal disease due to hypertension (72% AA vs 37% C, P <.001), pretransplant dialysis (95% AA vs 82% C, P =.003), waiting time (1.9 years AA vs 1.1 years C, P =.02), cadaveric donation (88% AA vs 68% C, P =.01), HLA mismatching (mean 3.5 AA vs 2.4 C, P <.001), and delayed graft function (DGF; 50% AA vs 22% C, P =.001). RESULTS: The 5-year actuarial patient and graft survival rates were 96% AA versus 83% C (P = NS) and 83% AA versus 75% C, (P = NS), respectively. The incidence of acute rejection (21% AA vs 12% C, P = NS) and mean time to acute rejection (12 months AA vs 11 months C) were similar. Although the incidence of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) was comparable (7% AA vs 5% C), the mean time to CAN was shorter in AA recipients (18 months AA vs 37 months C, P =.03). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest marked improvement in post-transplant outcomes in the TAC era in patients with multiple immunologic risk factors including AA ethnicity, cadaveric donor source, DGF, and HLA mismatching.     

Comparative analysis of the results of orthotopic liver transplantation in patients with and without portal vein thrombosis

INTRODUCTION: Portal vein thrombosis (PVT), which had been considered an absolute contraindication to orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), is currently considered a risk factor that increases morbi-mortality. The objective of this study was to compare OLT outcomes in patients with vs without PVT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between April 1986 and December 2003, a sample of 83 patients with PVT was compared with another sample of 83 patients without PVT among 962 OLT performed in our department. RESULTS: Both groups were homogeneous in terms of epidemiological variables, surgical technique, immunosuppression, and donor-related variables. There were no differences with respect to graft function during the first week following surgery. Surgical time and anhepatic phase duration was longer in the PVT group, albeit the differences were not significant. PVT patients also required more transfusions; a strong statistical association was observed with respect to blood (P = .12) and plasma (P = .11) transfusions and statistically significant differences regarding platelet transfusions (P = .02). Time on mechanical ventilation and the length of stay in the ICU were longer but not significant among PVT patients. The only statistically significant difference was the incidence of portal rethrombosis (P = .02). With respect to mean and global patient and graft actuarial survivals after 1, 3, 5, and 10 years, we have observed no significant intergroup differences, although both patient (P = .48; NS) and graft (P = .96, NS) survivals were lower among PVT cases. CONCLUSIONS: PVT should not only cease to be considered a contraindication for OLT, but there were no significant differences between the outcomes despite this finding.     

Cadaveric donor factor variations during a 12-year period: influence on kidney transplant outcomes

Our purpose was to evaluate changes in cadaveric donor factors between 1993 and 2004 and their impact on the short- and long-term outcomes of renal transplants in a single center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cadaveric renal transplants performed in our unit between 1993 and 2004 were divided in two groups of identical length: A (n = 455; 1993-1998) and B (n = 465; 1999-2004). Major differences related to donor, graft, and recipient factors were analyzed between groups and correlated with main outcome parameters. Recipient age, gender, weight, etiology of end-stage renal disease, average length of dialysis, and cold ischemia were not different in the two periods. RESULTS: Grafts harvested in our hospital were more frequent in group A (92.3 vs 78.2%; P < .005). Traumatic causes of death were more frequent before 1999: 90.9 vs 70.9% (P < .001). Mean donor age was higher after 1999: 31.37 vs 35.94 years (P < .005). Female donors were more frequent in the second period: 20.5 vs 26.6% (P < .05). Mean donor weight was also higher: 52.36 vs 67.86 kg (P < .05). All of these differences were unfavourable characteristics regarding graft outcomes. Delayed graft function (A = 13%, B = 24.2%), acute rejection episodes (A = 41.2%, B = 28%), and chronic allograft dysfunction (A = 23.5%, B = 14.4%) were also significantly different between the two cohorts (P < .005). Graft function (serum creatinine at 1 and 2 years), patient and graft survivals, causes of graft loss, and of patient death were similar across time. CONCLUSION: The unfavorable tendency in the quality of cadaveric donors during the last 12 years had no negative impact on graft function and patient outcome.     

Graft function 5-7 years after renal transplantation in early childhood

BACKGROUND: Low recipient age is still a risk factor for graft failure after kidney transplantation (Tx). Detailed prospective reports on long-term graft function in small children after renal Tx are still lacking. METHODS: Forty-nine kidney allograft recipients who received transplants before the age of 5 years were followed prospectively. The most common disease was congenital nephrotic syndrome of the Finnish type. Twenty patients were recipients of living related donors (LRD), and 29 were cadaveric kidney (CAD) recipients. All patients received triple immunosuppression. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR), effective renal plasma flow (ERPF), sodium, urate, and potassium handling, and concentrating capacity were studied for up to 7 years after Tx. RESULTS: Patient survival 7 years after Tx was 100% for LRD and 96% for CAD recipients. Graft survival was 94% for LRD and 79% for CAD recipients (P=NS) and 89% and 83% for children >2 years and <2 years of age at Tx, respectively (P=NS). Five years after Tx, GFR was 70 vs. 64 and ERPF was 380 vs. 310 ml/min/1.73 m2 for LRD and CAD recipients, respectively (P=NS). Mean absolute GFR remained stable. GFR was lower in children who received transplants at <2 years than in children who received transplants at >2 years of age, 54 vs. 75 ml/min/1.73 m2 (P=0.02). Sodium handling remained intact, but hyperuricemia was seen in 43-67%; 17-33% showed abnormal handling of potassium; and most patients had a subnormal concentrating capacity. CONCLUSIONS: Excellent long-term graft survival and good graft function can be achieved with triple immunosuppression, even in young CAD kidney recipients.     

Evaluation of risk factors in the development of postoperative complications in patients undergoing liver resection for cancer

A consecutive series of 134 hepatic resections for primary and metastatic cancer were analyzed to identify the risk factors for post-operative complications in patients with and without impaired liver reserve. Between January 1992 and January 2000 were performed 55 hepatectomies (41%--group 1) in 54 cirrhotic patients for hepatocarcinoma and 79 hepatic resections (59%--group 2) in 66 patients for primary hepatic malignancies or metastatic liver tumours in non cirrhotic liver. Among major postoperative complications bile leakage was recorded in 8 patients (6%) (6% with impaired liver reserve and 6% with normal reserve), hepatic failure in 8 patients (6%) (9% vs 4%; P = NS), ascites in 7 patients (5%) (11% vs 1%; P = 0.01), pneumonia in 4 patients (3%) (5% vs 1%; P = NS), intra-abdominal abscess in 2 patients (1%) (2% vs 1%; P = NS), postoperative haemorrhage in 2 patients (1%) (4% vs 0; P = NS), and gastrointestinal bleeding in 2 patients (1%) (4% vs 0; P = NS). There were 6 perioperative deaths (4%) (7% vs 2%; P = NS). The mean hospital stay was 21 +/- 10 days (range: 5-57) (24 +/- 10 vs 20 +/- 10; P = 0.02). Liver resection is a safe procedure even in cirrhotic patients providing they are well selected and there is minimal intraoperative blood loss.     

Kidney transplantation with Belzer or Custodiol solution: a randomized prospective study

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the Belzer vs Custodiol solutions for cadaveric kidney perfusion in relation to delayed graft function, renal function, acute rejection episodes, and patient and graft survivals. METHODS: This randomized prospective study included 42 kidneys and 9 simultaneous kidney and pancreas recipients from December 2002 to February 2004, namely 24 in the Custodiol arm and 27 in the Belzer arm. We analyzed delayed graft function frequency, acute rejection episodes (biopsy proven), renal function (creatinine at 1, 6, and 12 months), as well as graft and patient survivals. Categorical and continuous variables were evaluated as appropriate. RESULTS: We failed to observe a difference in the immunosuppressant drug protocol, cold ischemia time, or mean recipient or donor age. The prevalence of delayed graft function was 63% among the Belzer arm, and 50% among the Custodiol arm (P = NS). The renal function was the same in both arms at 1, 6, and 12 months. The graft survival after 3 months was 94% among the Belzer group (death from sepsis), and 95% among the Custodiol group (nonfunctioning graft). At 1 year, the results were 78% among the Belzer group (4 deaths from cardiovascular or infectious complications and 2 graft losses), and 79% among the Custodiol group (3 deaths, 1 primary nonfunctioning graft, and 1 graft loss; P = NS). After 12 months follow-up, patient survival was 84% among the Belzer group, and 86% among the Custodiol group. In the first year, the incidences of biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes were 37% among the Belzer group, and 33% among the Custodiol group. CONCLUSION: Custodiol solution achieved similar results compared with Belzer solution.     

Patient mortality after graft failure reduces kidney transplant patient survival only in the long term: an "intention to treat" analysis

The benefits of kidney transplantation over dialysis on patient survival have been demonstrated without considering the outcomes of patients with graft loss. To determine whether mortality after graft failure reduced the transplantation advantage in patient survival, we retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 918 first-deceased renal transplant recipients from May 1979 to August 2005. Patient survivals were 88% and 72% at 10 and 20 years; cancer (26%) and cardiovascular disease (25%) were the major causes of death. Graft survivals were 72% and 50% at 10 and 20 years; chronic rejection was the major cause of graft loss (50%). Patient outcomes after return to dialysis were reviewed in 224 of 240 patients. The survivals were 97%, 83%, and 70% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively; cardio-cerebrovascular disease (56%), infections (9%), cachexia (9%), and cancer (8%) were the major causes of death. Mortality correlated with patient age at transplantation (P< .001). Re-listed patients (96 of 224) were younger (32+/-10 vs 43+/-11 years; P< .001), had a shorter dialysis period pretransplant (3.2+/-3.1 vs 4.3+/-3.9 years; P< .03), and a better survival at 10 years (98% vs 56%; P< .001). Ten-year mortality for patients who returned to dialysis was 20% higher than for patients with a functioning graft (P< .001). The reduction in overall patient survival was 2.2% at 10 years (P=NS), 5% at 15 years (P=NS), and 14% at 20 years (P< .05). The same results have been demonstrated for patients >50 years at transplantation. In conclusion, the mortality rate after return to dialysis did not influence the long-term benefits of kidney transplantation.     

Tumor necrosis factor beta gene polymorphisms associated with urinary tract infections after renal transplantation

INTRODUCTION: We investigated whether tumor necrosis factor (TNF) beta(low) or TNFbeta(high) alleles predicted susceptibility to infection or rejection after renal transplantation. METHODS: TNFbeta alleles were determined in 137 (ESRD) patients and correlated with urinary tract infections and rejection within 60 days among 75 consecutive renal transplant recipients. RESULTS: TNFbeta low was more prevalent among African-Americans than caucasians (83 vs. 63%, P=0.02). After renal transplantation, patients with TNFbeta low experienced more urinary tract infections (50 vs. 10%, P=0.002). The incidence of TNFbeta low and urinary tract infections were equivalent in patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil/cyclosporine (CsAA) (n=37) versus mycophenolate mofetil/tacrolimus (n=38). TNFbeta low was not associated with the incidence of delayed graft function (5 vs. 2, P=NS), early rejection (21 vs. 18%, P=NS) or actuarial 1-year graft survival (96 vs. 90%, P=NS). CONCLUSIONS: TNFbeta low was associated with urinary tract infections and TNFbeta high was associated with freedom from urinary tract infections. Neither gene correlated with rejection or l-year graft survival.     

Simultaneous renal transplantation and native nephrectomy in patients with autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease

Our objective was to study the influence on transplant outcome of unilateral native nephrectomy of massively enlarged kidneys at the time of renal transplantation among patients with end-stage renal disease owing to autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 159 renal transplants in patients with ADPKD divided into two groups according to the need to perform a unilateral native nephrectomy owing to enlarged kidneys (N+; n = 143) versus those not (N0; n = 16) needing this procedure. Parameters related to the donors, grafts, recipients, and operative data were correlated with short- and long-term outcomes. The groups were homogeneous in terms of recipient and donor ages, genders, HLA compatibilities, and length of pretransplant dialysis. RESULTS: When no nephrectomy was needed surgery length was shorter (N0, 3.01 vs. N+, 4.23 hours; P < .001), less intraoperative crystalloids were infused (N0, 1.84 vs. N+, 2.76 L; P < .001), and less plasma (N0, 2.07 vs. N+, 2.93 U; P < .05), or blood (N0, 1.05 vs. N+, 1.81 U; P < .05) transfusions were required. Hospital stay was similar (N0, 12.70 vs N+, 16.50 days; P not significant [NS]). There was only one urologic complication in the nephrectomy group. There were no differences (P = NS) in rates of delayed graft function (N0, 19.9%; N+, 12.5%), acute rejections (N0, 25.5%; N0, 33.3%), chronic allograft dysfunction (N0, 15.8%; N+, 28.6%). Graft function at 1 month as well as 1 and 5 years were comparable. Patient and graft survivals were similar at 1 and 5 years. There were no differences in the causes of graft loss or patient death. CONCLUSION: In patients with ADPKD native nephrectomy of massively enlarged kidneys may be safely performed during the transplant procedure with no repercussions on the length of hospital stay, graft short- and long-term function and patient survival. However the procedure eads to a longer operative time and greater need for fluids and blood products.     

One year results of preoperative single bolus ATG-Fresenius induction therapy in sensitized renal transplant recipients

Sensitization in kidney transplantation is associated with more acute rejections, inferior graft survival, and an increase in delayed graft function. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative single bolus antithymocyte globulin (ATG) induction therapy in sensitized renal transplant recipients. METHODS: Fifty-six cadaveric donor kidney transplant recipients were divided into two groups: Group I (nonsensitized group, n = 30) and group II (sensitized group, PRA>10%, n = 26). ATG was given as a single preoperative bolus induction therapy to group II (ATG IV; 9 mg/kg). The group I patients were treated with mycophenolate mofetil preoperatively as induction therapy. The basic immunosuppressive regimen included tacrolimus (FK-506) or cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone. After hospital discharge, patients were followed on a routine outpatient basis for 12 months. RESULTS: Acute rejection episodes (ARE) occurred in 20% (6/30) of group I and 15.38% (4/26) of group II patients (P = NS). Infections occurred in eight patients (26.7%) as 11 episodes (36.7%), averaging 1.4 episodes per infected patient in group 1, and 6 patients (23.1%) for a total of 10 episodes (38.5%), averaging 1.7 episodes per infected patient, in group II (P = NS). Occurrence of side effects and hospital stay were almost comparable in the two groups. No delayed graft function was observed in either group. The 12-month actuarial patient and graft survival were 100% in Group I and II. CONCLUSION: A preoperative single bolus ATG induction therapy was an effective and safe therapeutic measure, yielding an acceptable acute rejection rate in presensitized renal transplant recipients.     

Liver transplantation for fulminant hepatic failure: importance of renal failure

Abstract One hundred eighty-one consecutive patients with fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) presenting in a 2-year period were reviewed. In this cohort we examined the impact of pretransplant renal failure on mortality and morbidity following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTx). Twenty-seven patients (18 female, 9 male) with a median age of 43.5 years (range 19–65 years) underwent OLTx. FHF was due to idiosyncratic drug reaction ( n = 4), paracetamol overdose ( n = 3), seronegative hepatitis ( n = 17), hepatitis B ( n = 1), veno-occlusive disease ( n = 1), and Wilson's disease ( n = 1). Renal failure was present in 14 patients, 7 of whom died (whereas there was 100 % survival in patients without renal failure). Pretransplant renal failure was associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation (13 days vs 6 days, P = 0.05), prolonged intensive care stay (17 days vs 8 days, P - 0.01) and prolonged hospital stay (27 vs 21 days, P = NS). Pretransplant renal failure did not predict renal dysfunction at 1 year after OLTx. We conclude that the survival of patients transplanted for FHF is inferior to that of patients transplanted for chronic liver disease (67 % vs 88 % 1-year survival in Birmingham). For patients with FHF undergoing transplantation, pretransplant renal failure strongly predicts poor outcome with significantly greater consumption of resources.     

Enhancement of allograft survival by donor-specific transfusion one day prior to transplant. Importance of timing and specificity when DST is given with cyclosporine.

Donor-specific transfusion effects were studied in the ACI-to-Lewis rat heterotopic heart allograft model using cyclosporine immunosuppression. Low-dose CsA for 1 week plus a single fresh or stored DST given 1 day before allografting significantly prolonged graft survival over CsA therapy alone (median survival time 23.5 days vs. 10 days, P less than 0.01), but third-party transfusion did not (11.5 vs. 10 days, NS). When CsA was started at the time of DST and continued for 2 weeks, maximal graft enhancement was achieved after just one DST. DST/CsA was equally efficacious if given on any day before transplantation, provided CsA was started on the same day as the transfusion. However, pretransplant DST given without CsA shortened subsequent graft survival of day -1 DST/CsA treatment (14.5 days, n = 6, vs. 60 days for controls, n = 10; P less than 0.01). The addition of methylprednisolone to the DST/CsA protocol had no effect on graft survival (51 vs. 53 days, P = NS), but extending the period of postoperative CsA therapy for 4 weeks at reduced dose (2.5 mg/kg/day) significantly prolonged median survival (111 days, n = 11) and resulted in 45% permanent engraftment (greater than 120 days survival). CsA permits graft enhancement with a single DST as early as 1 day before grafting. This avoids the risk of sensitization from DSTs and can extend DST use to cadaveric graft recipients.     

Individualization of immediate posttransplant immunosuppression. The value of antilymphocyte globulin in patients with delayed graft function

In patients with delayed graft function (DGF), the use of cyclosporine (CsA) has been reported to prolong DGF, increase the number of required dialyses, increase the duration of hospitalization, and be associated with decreased graft survival. Routine postoperative antilymphocyte globulin (ALG) use has been advocated, but ALG is associated with increased viral infection. We studied outcome of individualization of immunosuppression. Between 11/84 and 8/86, first-cadaver transplant recipients whose serum creatinine (Cr) fell greater than or equal to 30% in the first 24 hr (immediate function) were started on CsA and prednisone (P) (group 1, n = 26). The remainder were randomized to P and azathioprine (group 2, n = 32) or P and ALG (group 3, n = 26), and switched to CsA when serum Cr fell greater than 30% (minimum 5 days ALG for the ALG group). P taper was the same in all groups. Patients with DGF (groups 2 and 3) had longer preservation time and higher peak PRA (P less than .05) than group 1. Groups were otherwise equivalent. One and 2-year patient survival was 96% (3 cardiovascular deaths; all with functioning grafts). One-year graft survival was 87% for group 1, 87% for group 2, and 82% for group 3(NS). In patients requiring dialysis, mean day off dialysis was 12 +/- 3 in both groups 2 and 3. Mean hospital stay was 12.5 +/- 1.3 days for group 1, 21.6 +/- 2.1 days for group 2 (P less than .05 vs. 1 & 3), and 14.5 +/- 1.2 days for group 3 (NS vs. 1). The increased hospital stay for group 2 patients was mainly due to increased in-hospital rejections: 75% for group 2, (P less than .05 vs. group 1 [35%], and group 3 [11.5%]). In addition, more group 2 in-hospital 1st rejections were steroid resistant as compared to group 1; 46% group 1 patients have remained rejection free as compared to 0% group 2 (P less than .05 vs. 1 and 3) and 35% of group 3 (P less than .05 vs. 1 and 2). Mean serum creatinine at 6-12 months remained higher in patients with DGF (group 1 P less than .05 vs. 2 and 3). Rejection was the major cause of graft loss in all groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Use of extended right grafts from in situ split livers in adult liver transplantation: a comparison with whole-liver transplants

INTRODUCTION: We report our experience of in situ split-liver transplantation (SLT) for adult patients and compare the results with those achieved with whole-liver transplantation (WLT). METHOD: From November 1997 to December 2003, 109 liver transplantation were performed in 104 adult patients including 90 WLT (83%) and 19 SLT (17%) grafts. Fifteen extended right grafts (ERG, segments I + IV to VIII) were obtained with in situ split-liver procedures, generating also left lateral segment grafts, which were transplanted at our institution or elsewhere. Four left lobe (LL, segments I to IV) and right lobe (segments V to VIII) grafts were obtained by a modified in situ procedure for adult recipients. UNOS status, percentage of primary or secondary transplantation, and underlying liver disease were similar among patients receiving whole versus split grafts. Donors were older in whole than ERG cohorts (53 vs 26 years, P < .001). Procurement parameters and intraoperative profiles of transplant procedure were comparable among the groups. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 18 months (range: 1 to 73). Four patients with whole (4%) and no patient with ERG underwent retransplantation (P = NS). One- and 3-year patient survivals were 86% and 79% with WLT versus 93% and 93% with ERG (P = NS). One- and 3-year graft survivals were 84% and 75% with WLT versus 93%, and 93% with ERG (P = NS). Incidence of vascular complications was 8% with WLT, 13% with ERG (P = NS). The incidence of biliary complications was 13% in WLT, 27% in ERG (P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: The use of ERG from in situ split livers for adult transplantation allowed us to obtain results comparable or even better than those obtained with WLT. Split-liver transplantation is an effective, safe mechanism to expand the cadaveric donor pool.     

Impact of recipient and donor ages on patient and graft survival after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of donor and recipient ages on patient and graft survival after kidney transplant. METHODS: Patients in a hospital database undergoing kidney transplant for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) during the period 1985 to May 2006 (n = 410; mean age 42 +/- 10 years; 61% men and 39% women) were divided into two groups: group A, patients of 60 years or older (6%, n = 24), and group B, those younger than 60 years (94, n = 386). In 204 patients (49.8%) the pancreas was transplanted simultaneously with the kidney. RESULTS: Overall 1-, 3-, 5-year patient survivals were 92%, 90%, 88% in group A and 95%, 90%, 87% in group B (P = .6, NS). Overall 1-, 3-, 5-year kidney graft was 92%, 75%, 65% in group A and 92%, 84%, 79% in group B (P = .7, NS). Donors were divided into two groups: group 1, 55 years or older (15%, n = 62), versus group 2, those younger than 55 years (85%, n = 348). Overall 1-, 3-, 5-year patient survivals were 91%, 86%, 76% in group 1 and 97%, 94%, 90% in group 2 (P = .0009). Overall 1-, 3-, 5-year kidney graft survivals were 87%, 82%, 76% in group 1 and 94%, 86%, 82% in group 2 (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Renal transplantation is an effective option for the treatment of ESRD in elderly patients. The overall rates of patient and kidney graft survival are comparable to those of younger patients. Donor age > or =55 years had a negative effect on patient and kidney graft survival.     

Significant differences in the efficacy of kidney transplantation between Hungarian Caucasians and Gypsies

In a retrospective study we examined the differences between Caucasian (Group A) and Gypsy (Group B) renal allograft recipients transplanted in Hungary. From 1983 to 2001, 1918 transplants were performed in Budapest (1825 Caucasian and 93 Gypsy recipients). Group B patients were younger (34 +/- 12 vs 42 +/- 14 years of age; P < .01) and Group A had more polycystic kidney disease (12% vs 3%; P < .025). Blood group B was more common in Group B (27% vs 19%; P = NS) than in Group A patients, and Group A had seemingly more diabetes (5% vs 1%; P = NS) than did Group B. There were no differences in HLA mismatches or panel reactive antibodies (PRA). No differences were seen in Group A vs Group B patient survivals at 1, 3, 5, or 10 years' posttransplant (98% vs 95%; 90% vs 93%; 85% vs 88%; and 74% vs 82%, respectively). However, Group A graft survivals were significantly better than Group B at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years' posttransplant (89% vs 77%; 82% vs 66%; 76% vs 54%; and 57% vs 34%; each comparison P < .01). Group B recipients experienced a greater number of acute rejection episodes (66% vs 49%; P < .01), irreversible acute rejections (15% vs 6%; P < .001), chronic rejections (34% vs 18%; P < .001), and graft loss due to immunosuppression noncompliance (5% vs 1%; P < .05) than did Group A recipients. As has been previously described for other non-Caucasian ethnic groups (eg, African-Americans), Hungarian Gypsies appear to be at a greater immunological risk for rejection and poorer long-term graft survival.     

Early pancreas transplant outcomes with histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate preservation: a multicenter study

Little is known about the use of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) preservation solution for pancreas preservation. We compared early pancreas graft outcomes at four pancreas transplant programs within the state of Michigan in 2002 and 2003 (University of Wisconsin [UW] era) with those in 2004 (HTK era). The primary endpoint was early graft loss. The UW group (n=41) and the HTK group (n=36) had similar outcomes with respect to: technical graft loss (9.8% vs. 8.3%, P=NS), 90-day graft function (90.2% vs. 86.1%, P=NS), and rate of pancreatic leak/abscess (12.2% vs. 11.1%, P=NS). There were also no significant differences in postoperative amylase and lipase levels between the two groups. The HTK group did have significantly more acute rejection within the first 180 days (25.0% vs. 9.8%, P<0.05). HTK is a suitable substitute for UW in the preservation of pancreas allografts.     

Kidney transplantation from elderly donors: a prospective randomized study comparing celsior and UW solutions

AIM: The aim of present study was to assess the effect of Celsior as compared with University of Wisconsin (UW) solution on immediate and long-term function of kidney transplants harvested from elderly donors. METHODS: A prospective multicenter randomized study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of Celsior versus UW solution for the clinical preservation of the kidney. Fifty renal transplants were performed from donors over 60 years old. Twenty-five kidneys were stored in Celsior and 25 in UW solution. The groups were comparable with regard to donor and recipient characteristics. Renal function outcomes were compared by evaluating delayed graft function rates, daily urinary output, as well as the evolution of mean serum creatinine at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 15 days. RESULTS: The warm ischemia time was 42.4 +/- 11 minutes among Celsior vs 46.9 +/- 17.9 minutes in the UW cohort (P = NS). The cold ischemia time was 18 +/- 4.5 hours in Celsior and 19 +/- 6.5 hours in UW (P = NS). Delayed graft function occurred in 48% of the Celsior group and in 52% of the UW group (P = NS). Mean serum creatinine levels and mean daily urinary output were also similar. One- and 5-year graft survivals of kidneys preserved with Celsior were 91.8% and 79.3% compared with 96% and 87.4% for UW without any significant statistical difference. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that the preservation of kidneys from elderly donors in Celsior solution is equivalent to that of UW solution.