The effect of rotator cuff tears on reaction forces at the glenohumeral joint.

The rotator cuff muscles maintain glenohumeral stability by compressing the humeral head into the glenoid. Disruption of the rotator cuff compromises concavity compression and can directly affect the loads on the glenohumeral joint. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of rotator cuff tears on the magnitude and direction of glenohumeral joint reaction forces during active shoulder abduction in the scapular plane using nine cadaveric upper extremities. Motion of the full upper extremity was simulated using a dynamic shoulder testing apparatus. Glenohumeral joint reaction forces were measured by a universal force-moment sensor. Five conditions of rotator cuff tears were tested: Intact, Incomplete Supraspinatus Tear, Complete Supraspinatus Tear, Supraspinatus/Infraspinatus Tear, and Global Tear. Reaction forces at the glenohumeral joint were found to steadily increase throughout abduction and peaked at maximum abduction for all conditions tested. There were no significant differences in reaction force magnitude for the intact condition (337 +/- 88 N) or those involving an isolated incomplete tear (296 +/- 83 N) or complete tear (300 +/- 85 N) of the supraspinatus tendon. Extension of tears beyond the supraspinatus tendon into the anterior and posterior aspect of the rotator cuff led to a significant decrease in the magnitude of joint reaction force (126 +/- 31 N). Similarly, such tears resulted in a significant change in the direction of the reaction force at the glenohumeral joint. These results suggest that joint reaction forces are significantly affected by the integrity of the rotator cuff, specifically, by the transverse force couple formed by the anterior and posterior aspects of the cuff. The quantitative data obtained in this study on the effect of rotator cuff tears on magnitude and direction of the reaction force at the glenohumeral joint helps clarify the relationship between joint motion, joint compression and stability.     

Thoracohumeral muscle activity alters glenohumeral joint biomechanics during active abduction.

Normal function of the glenohumeral joint depends on coordinated muscle forces that stabilize the joint while moving the shoulder. These forces can either provide compressive forces to press the humeral head into the glenoid or translational forces that may destabilize the glenohumeral joint. The objective of this study was to quantify the effect of pectoralis major and latissimus dorsi muscle activity on glenohumeral kinematics and joint reaction forces during simulated active abduction. Nine fresh-frozen whole upper extremities were tested using a dynamic shoulder testing apparatus. Seven muscle force combinations were examined: a standard combination and 10%, 20%, or 30% of the deltoid force applied to the latissimus dorsi or pectoralis major tendon, respectively. Pectoralis major and latissimus dorsi muscle activity decreased the maximum angle of glenohumeral abduction and external rotation, and increased the maximum horizontal adduction angle compared to the standard muscle combination. Thoracohumeral muscle activity also created a more anteriorly directed joint reaction force that resulted in anterior translation compared to the standard muscle combination. Therefore, the ratio between anteriorly directed translational forces and compressive forces increased during abduction due to this muscle activity, suggesting that thoracohumeral muscle activity may decrease glenohumeral stability based on the joint position and applied loads. A better understanding of the contribution of muscle forces to stability may improve rehabilitation protocols for the shoulder aimed at maximizing compression and minimizing translation at the glenohumeral joint.     

Function of the supraspinatus muscle: Abduction of the humerus studied in cadavers

We evaluated the function of the supraspinatus tendon with a dynamic shoulder model. Active glenohumeral joint motion was simulated in 10 cadaveric shoulder specimens with hydrodynamic cylinder forces at the deltoid muscle and at the rotator cuff. Computerized regulation initiated standardized cycles of glenohumeral joint motion, where the isolated effect of the supraspinatus muscle could be studied. The efficacy of the supraspinatus muscle on elevation of the glenohumeral joint was measured with an ultrasonic sensor system. Pressures underneath the coracoa-cromial vault were recorded with capacitive sensors, as an indicator of the impingement at the shoulder. Elimination of force of the supraspinatus muscle led to a 6 percent decrease in elevation of the glenohumeral joint. The deltoid muscle was able to reverse this loss of elevation by a force increase of one third of the lost supraspinatus force. If no force was applied to the supraspinatus muscle, average pressures underneath the coracoacromial vault decreased 8 percent. It was concluded that the supraspinatus produces less torque and more glenohumeral joint compression than the deltoid. However, the supraspinatus has no effect on depression of the humeral head during elevation.

The clinical consequence of our observations is that operative closure of supraspinatus tendon defects is not mandatory.     

Neer Award 2006: Biomechanical assessment of inferior tuberosity placement during hemiarthroplasty for four-part proximal humeral fractures

Tuberosity malpositioning commonly occurs and is associated with a decline in clinical function after prosthetic shoulder reconstruction for proximal humeral fractures. This study assesses the biomechanical effects of inferior tuberosity position on glenohumeral joint forces and humeral head position at multiple positions. Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were tested. Hemiarthroplasty was performed with preservation of anatomic tuberosity height and with 10 mm and 20 mm of inferior tuberosity displacement. The rotator cuff, deltoid, pectoralis major, and latissimus dorsi muscles were statically loaded. Contact forces and humeral head position were recorded within a functional range of motion. Glenohumeral joint forces shifted significantly superiorly (P < .05) at 30 degrees of abduction after both 10 mm and 20 mm of tuberosity displacement. At 60 degrees of glenohumeral abduction, glenohumeral joint forces remained significantly altered after tuberosity displacement of 10 mm and 20 mm compared with the intact height (P < .005). This study demonstrates that, during hemiarthroplasty performed for proximal humeral fractures, malpositioning the tuberosities inferiorly results in significant superior glenohumeral joint force displacement. These findings suggest that the mechanical advantage of the shoulder abductor muscles is compromised with inferior tuberosity malpositioning and may help to explain inferior functional results seen in these patients.     

Glenohumeral kinematics following total shoulder arthroplasty: a finite element investigation.

The osseous geometry of the glenohumeral joint is naturally nonconforming and minimally constrained, and the joint's stability is maintained by action of the rotator cuff muscles. Damage to these muscles is often associated with joint degeneration, and a variety of glenoid prostheses have been developed to impart varying degrees of stability postoperatively. The issues of conformity and constraint within the artificial shoulder have been addressed through in vivo and in vitro studies, although few computational models have been presented. The current investigation presents the results of three-dimensional finite element analyses of the total shoulder joint and the effects of design parameters upon glenohumeral interaction. Conformity was shown not to influence the loads required to destabilize the joint, although it was the principal factor determining the magnitude of humeral head translation. Constraint was found to correlate linearly with the forces required to dislocate the humeral head, with higher constraint leading to slightly greater humeral migration at the point of joint instability. The model predicts that patients with a dysfunctional supraspinatus would experience frequent eccentric loading of the glenoid, especially in the superior direction, which would likely lead to increased fixation stresses, and hence, a greater chance of loosening. For candidates with an intact rotator cuff, the models developed in this study predict that angular constraints of at least 14 degrees and 6.5 degrees in the superoinferior and anteroposterior axes are required to provide stable unloaded abduction of the humerus, with larger constraints of 18 degrees and 10 degrees necessitated by a dysfunctional supraspinatus. The tools developed during this study can be used to determine the capacity for different implant designs to provide resistance to excessive glenohumeral translations and reduce the potential for instability of the joint, allowing surgeons to optimize postoperative functional gains on a patient by patient basis.     

The entire rotator cuff contributes to elevation of the arm

The function of the infraspinatus, teres minor, and subscapularis during elevation of the arm remains poorly defined. These muscles may generate moments that contribute to abduction of the arm, although they frequently are classified as humeral depressors. The purposes of this study were to measure the contributions to abduction made by the more inferiorly positioned rotator cuff muscles relative to the contributions of the supraspinatus and to determine the range of motion at which the muscles are most effective. Five fresh cadaveric shoulder girdles were mounted in an apparatus designed to simulate contraction of the deltoid and rotator cuff while maintaining the normal relationship between glenohumeral and scapulothoracic motions. The deltoid force required for elevation was measured without simulated contraction of the rotator cuff and with simulated contraction of the entire rotator cuff, of the supraspinatus only, and of the infraspinatus-teres minor and subscapularis only. A significant reduction in deltoid force when other muscle activity was added indicated that the additions contributed significantly to abduction. The deltoid force required with concurrent contraction of the entire rotator cuff averaged 41% less than with the deltoid alone but was not significantly different than with the deltoid and supraspinatus or with the deltoid, infraspinatus-teres minor, and subscapularis. Concurrent application of forces to the supraspinatus or the infraspinatusteres minro and subscapularis significantly reduced the required deltoid force over the range of motion studied by an average of 28 and 36%, respectively. The contributions of the rotator cuff muscles to abduction of the arm were greatest at low abduction angles (30 and 60°) and were insignificant by 120°. The infraspinatus-teres minor and subscapularis contribute significantly to abduction: their contibution was equal to that of the supraspinatus and, like the supraspinatus, they are most effective during the first 90° of abduction.     

The biomechanics of the rotator cuff in health and disease – A narrative review

The rotator cuff has an important role in the stability and function of the glenohumeral joint. It is a complex anatomic structure commonly affected by injury such as tendinopathy and cuff tears. The rotator cuff helps to provide a stabilising effect to the shoulder joint by compressing the humeral head against the glenoid cavity via the concavity compression mechanism. To appreciate the function of the cuff it is imperative to understand the normal biomechanics of the cuff as well as the mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of cuff disease.The shoulder joint offers a wide range of motion due to the variety of rotational moments the cuff muscles are able to provide. In order for the joint to remain stable, the cuff creates a force couple around the glenohumeral joint with coordinated activation of adjacent muscles, which work together to contain the otherwise intrinsically unstable glenohumeral joint and prevent proximal migration of the humerus. Once this muscular balance is lost, increased translations or subluxation of the humeral head may result, leading to changes in the magnitude and direction of the joint reaction forces at the glenohumeral joint. These mechanical changes may then result in a number of clinical presentations of shoulder dysfunction, disease and pain.This narrative review aims to highlight the importance of functional rotator cuff biomechanics whilst assessing the kinetics and kinematics of the shoulder joint, as well as exploring the various factors involved in cuff disease.     

Modifizierte Technik der Verpflanzung des Musculus trapezius zur Funktionsverbesserung bei Armplexusschäden

OBJECTIVE: Increase of shoulder stability. Elimination of inferior subluxation of the humeral head. Increase of active abduction. Better control of the paralyzed arm. Decrease or elimination of shoulder pain. INDICATIONS: Palsy of deltoid and supraspinatus muscles with weak abduction, multidirectional shoulder instability and subluxation of the humeral head after complete neurosurgical therapy (neurolysis, reconstruction of the brachial plexus). No essential active function of the elbow and hand. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Weakness of trapezius muscle. Incomplete rehabilitation after neurosurgical procedure. Stiffness of the glenohumeral joint. Arthritis of the glenohumeral joint. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: The cranial part of the trapezius muscle is detached from the scapular spine and the clavicle. Its insertion at the acromion is left untouched. The acromion is freed from the scapular spine and the lateral end of the clavicle by oblique osteotomies and then transferred to the proximal humerus. Under maximum tension the deltoid muscle is sutured on top of the trapezius muscle. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Immobilization of the arm in an abduction support (75 degrees of abduction) for 6 weeks. The physiotherapy program starts on the 1st postoperative day with assisted and active training of elbow, hand, and fingers. During the 1st postoperative week, the abduction support is removed for physiotherapy, abduction is maintained during the exercises. After 6 weeks, progressive adduction to remove the abduction support is commenced. RESULTS: The procedure was performed in 104 cases. 80 patients were followed up on average after 2.4 years (0.8-8 years). In all cases, the transfer resulted in an increase of function and in 95% in a decrease of multidirectional shoulder instability. The modification of the original technique in the latest 22 cases was superior in terms of shoulder stability. In all these cases, a decrease of instability was achieved and inferior subluxation was abolished.     

Shoulder electromyography in multidirectional instability

We studied shoulder muscle activity in multidirectional instability (MDI) and multidirectional laxity (MDL) of the shoulder, our hypothesis being that altered muscle activity plays a role in their pathogenesis. Six muscles (supraspinatus, infraspinatus, subscapularis, anterior deltoid, middle deltoid, and posterior deltoid) were investigated by use of intramuscular dual fine-wire electrodes in 7 normal shoulders, 5 MDL shoulders, and 6 MDI shoulders. Each subject performed 5 types of exercise (rotation in neutral, 45 degrees of abduction, 90 degrees of abduction, flexion/extension, and abduction/adduction) on an isokinetic muscle dynamometer at two rates, 90 degrees /s and 180 degrees /s. After filtering, rectification, and smoothing, the electromyography signal was normalized by using the peak voltage of the movement cycle. In subjects with MDI, compared with normal subjects, activity patterns of the anterior deltoid were different during rotation in neutral and 90 degrees of abduction, whereas those of the middle and posterior deltoid were different during rotation in 90 degrees of abduction. In subjects with MDL, the posterior deltoid showed increased activity compared with normal subjects during adduction. Activity patterns of the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and subscapularis appeared similar in both groups. Dual fine-wire electromyography offers insight into the complex role of shoulder girdle muscle function in normal movement and in instability. Altered patterns of shoulder girdle muscle activity and imbalances in muscle forces support the theory that impaired coordination of shoulder girdle muscle activity and inefficiency of the dynamic stabilizers of the glenohumeral joint are involved in the etiology of MDI. Interestingly, the abnormalities are in the deltoid rather than the muscles of the rotator cuff.     

Dynamic contributions to superior shoulder stability.

It has been suggested that superior decentralization of the humeral head is a mechanical factor in the etiology of degenerative rotator cuff tears. This superior decentralization may be caused by muscular imbalance. The objective of this study was to investigate the contribution of individual shoulder muscles to superior stability of the glenohumeral joint. In 10 fresh frozen cadaver shoulders the tendons of the rotator cuff, teres major, latissimus, pectoralis major, deltoid and biceps were prepared. The shoulders were tested in a shoulder-loading device in 0 degrees, 30degrees, 60 degrees and 90 degrees of glenohumeral abduction. A constant superior force of 20 N was applied to the humerus. Tensile loads were applied sequentially to the tendons in proportion to their cross-sectional areas and translations of the humeral head relative to the glenoid were recorded with a 3Space Fastrak system. Depression of the humeral head was most effectively achieved by the latissimus (5.6 +/- 2.2 mm) and the teres major (5.1 +/- 2.0 mm). Further studies should elucidate their possible in vivo role in the frontal plane force couple to counter balance the deltoid. The infraspinatus (4.6 +/- 2.0 mm) and subscapularis (4.7 +/- 1.9 mm) showed similar effects while the supraspinatus (2.0 +/- 1.4 mm) was less effective in depression. Therefore, the infraspinatus and subscapularis should be surgically repaired whenever possible. The supraspinatus may be of less importance for superior stability than previously assumed.     

Humeral head translation decreases with muscle loading

This study was conducted to determine the effect of in vitro passive and active loading on humeral head translation during glenohumeral abduction. A shoulder simulator produced unconstrained active abduction of the humerus in 8 specimens. Loading of the supraspinatus, subscapularis, infraspinatus/teres minor, and anterior, middle, and posterior deltoid muscles was simulated by use of 4 different sets of loading ratios. Significantly greater translations of the humeral head occurred both in 3 dimensions (P < .001) and in the sagittal plane (P < .005) during passive motion when compared with active motion from 30 degrees to 70 degrees of abduction. In the sagittal plane, passive abduction experienced a resultant translation of 3.8 +/- 1.0 mm whereas the active loading ratios averaged 2.3 +/- 1.0 mm. There were no significant differences in the translations that were produced by the 4 sets of muscle-loading ratios used to achieve active motions. This study emphasizes the importance of the musculature in maintaining normal ball-and-socket kinematics of the shoulder.     

The static rotator cuff does not affect inferior translation of the humerus at the glenohumeral joint.

BACKGROUND: The static contribution of the rotator cuff to the inferior stability of the shoulder is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of static rotator cuff muscles on the inferior stability of the glenohumeral joint. METHODS: The humeral head positions relative to the glenoid were obtained in 12 shoulder specimens under the following conditions: with and without a 1.5-kg load; with the humerus adducted and abducted 90 degrees; and in three stages of dissection: (1) before release of any of the rotator cuff muscles, (2) after release of the supraspinatus or the cuff muscles other than the supraspinatus, and (3) after release of all of the cuff muscles. The order of release was changed in two ways: release of the supraspinatus followed by the release of other muscles in one group, and the opposite order in the other group. RESULTS: In both adduction and abduction, there were no significant differences in the positions of the humeral head either among the three stages of release or between the two different orders of release. CONCLUSION: The static contribution of the cuff muscles to the inferior stability of the shoulder is insignificant.     

Glenohumeral joint reaction forces increase with critical shoulder angles representative of osteoarthritis—A biomechanical analysis

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the glenohumeral joint constitutes the most frequent indication for nontraumatic shoulder joint replacement. Recently, a small critical shoulder angle (CSA) was found to be associated with a high prevalence of OA. This study aims to verify the hypothesis that a small CSA leads to higher glenohumeral joint reaction forces during activities of daily living than a normal CSA. A shoulder simulator with simulated deltoid (DLT), supraspinatus (SSP), infraspinatus/teres minor (ISP/TM), and subscapularis (SSC) musculotendinous units was constructed. The DLT wrapping on the humerus was simulated using a pulley that could be horizontally adjusted to simulate the 28° CSA found in OA or the 33° CSA found in disease‐free shoulders. Over a range of motion between 6° and 82° of thoracohumeral abduction joint forces were measured using a six‐axis load cell. An OA‐associated CSA yielded higher net joint reaction forces than a normal CSA over the entire range of motion. The maximum difference of 26.4 N (8.5%) was found at 55° of thoracohumeral abduction. Our model thus suggests that a CSA typical for OA predisposes the glenohumeral joint to higher joint reaction forces and could plausibly play a role in joint overloading and development of OA. © 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 34:1047–1052, 2016.     

The radiographic study in the relationship of the glenohumeral joint.

Accurate reproduction of anatomic relationship is important in non-constrained prosthetic arthroplasty. The accurate lateral glenohumeral offset, which indicates a parameter of the lever arm of the deltoid and supraspinatus muscles, is one of the most important elements in achieving the efficient shoulder functions after prosthetic reconstruction. However, to our knowledge, there has been no detailed study on the influence of minute changes in the neck shaft angle, within the normal range, on lateral glenohumeral offset. In this study, we evaluated the relationship between the neck shaft angle and various geometric measurement values in the glenohumeral joint. Radiographs of 471 shoulders without osseous lesions in the glenohumeral joint and greater tuberosity were reviewed. There were 265 males and 206 females, and a mean age was 53.5 years old. The final diagnosis was impingement syndrome in 269 patients, rotator cuff tear in 147, and control group in 55 patients. Eight parameters were measured on true anteroposterior radiographs. The lateral glenohumeral offset correlated with the radius of the curvature of the humeral head and the humeral head diameter. The neck shaft angle was not correlated with the offset value. However, when the offset value was divided by the humeral head diameter, to eliminate the affection of the size of the humeral head toward the offset, a correlation was observed with the neck shaft angle. Based on these correlations, we could obtain the equation of the lateral glenohumeral offset according to the neck shaft angle. Using the equation, when the neck shaft angle is decided, the lateral glenohumeral offset can be estimated based on the correlation between the parameters, which achieve the efficient shoulder functions after prosthetic components. Therefore, inaccurate determination of the neck shaft angle in the humeral head component design and selection may induce dysfunction of the abductor muscles.     

The effect of infraspinatus disruption on glenohumeral torque and superior migration of the humeral head: a biomechanical study

Rotator cuff ruptures that extend into the infraspinatus tendon may cause dysfunction and superior migration of the humerus. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a threshold size of infraspinatus defect exists beyond which abduction torque generation decreases and superior migration of the humeral head increases. Glenohumeral abduction torque and superior humeral head translations were measured in hanging arms in neutral rotation in cadaver shoulders (n = 10). Loads were applied to the rotator cuff tendons and the middle deltoid. After sequential detachment of the infraspinatus, abduction torque progressively decreased. At three-fifths detachment, abduction torque was significantly lower than after supraspinatus release alone (52% vs 61%, P <.05). Superior translation after complete supraspinatus and infraspinatus detachment increased significantly (P <.05), but no intermediate threshold was detected. Therefore, the entire infraspinatus contributes to abduction torque generation and stabilizes the humeral head against superior subluxation. Even with a tear extending into the superior infraspinatus, the infraspinatus contributes abduction force generation across the glenohumeral joint.     

骨性缺损对肩关节稳定性影响的研究

目的探讨肩关节骨性缺损对关节稳定性的影响,为临床提供理论依据。方法分别制作肩胛盂及肱骨头缺损模型并逐渐增加缺损程度;以盂肱关节旋转中立位、60°外展位为起始位置,逐渐增加外旋角度至盂肱关节脱位,测量脱位发生前肱骨头前移距离;保持盂肱关节外展60°,分别在旋转中立位及外旋60°位时增加轴向应力,直至盂肱关节脱位,测量脱位前肱骨头的应力强度变化。结果随着肩胛盂及肱骨头缺损程度增加,外旋角度增加,肩关节稳定性下降,肱骨头位移不断增大,各组间呈显著性差异(P<0.01);盂肱关节外展60°、旋转中立位时,肱骨头应力强度随着骨缺损增大而不断增大,正常应力强度从1.68 Mpa迅速增加至4.62 Mpa,各组间呈显著性差异(P<0.01);盂肱关节外展60°、外旋60°时,正常应力强度为1.94 Mpa,骨缺损时迅速增加至6.65 Mpa,各组间呈显著性差异(P<0.01);肩关节不同缺损时,其接触力学特性证实了对肩关节稳定性有较大的影响,肩关节不稳定现象十分突出。结论随着肩胛盂及肱骨头缺损范围的增大,肩关节稳定性不断下降,肱骨头位移和应力强度不断增加,以致发生提前脱位。     

Muscle and joint‐contact loading at the glenohumeral joint after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

The purposes of this study were to determine the contributions of each shoulder muscle to glenohumeral joint force during abduction and flexion in both the anatomical and post‐operative shoulder and to identify factors that may contribute to the incidence of glenoid component loosening/failure and joint instability in the shoulder after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Eight cadaveric upper extremities were mounted onto a testing apparatus. Muscle lines of action were measured, and muscle forces and muscle contributions to glenohumeral joint forces were determined during abduction and flexion of the pre‐operative anatomical shoulder and of the shoulder after arthroplasty. Muscle forces in the middle deltoid during abduction and those in the middle and anterior deltoid during flexion were significantly lower in the reverse shoulder than the pre‐operative shoulder (p < 0.017). The resultant glenohumeral joint force in the reverse shoulder was significantly lower than that in the pre‐operative shoulder; however, the superior shear force acting at the glenohumeral joint was significantly higher (p < 0.001). Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty reduces muscle effort in performing lifting and pushing tasks; however, reduced joint compressive force has the potential to compromise joint stability, while an increased superior joint shear force may contribute to component loosening/failure. Because greater superior shear force is generated in flexion than in abduction, care should be taken to avoid excessive shoulder loading in this plane of elevation. © 2011 Orthopaedic Research Society Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 29:1850–1858, 2011     

Effect of joint compression on inferior stability of the glenohumeral joint

To determine the relative importance of negative intraarticular pressure, capsular tension, and joint compression on inferior stability of the glenohumeral joint we studied 17 fresh, normal adult cadaver shoulders using a "3 degrees of freedom" shoulder test apparatus. Translations were measured in intact and vented shoulders while a 50-N superior and inferior directed force was applied to the shoulder. Three different joint compressive loads (22 N, 111 N, 222 N) were applied externally. Tests were performed in 3 positions of humeral abduction in the scapular plane (0 degree, 45 degrees, 90 degrees) and in 3 positions of rotation (neutral, maximal internal, and maximal external). After tests of the intact and vented shoulder, the glenohumeral ligaments were sectioned and tests were repeated. With minimal joint compression of 22 N, negative intraarticular pressure and capsular tension limited translation of the humeral head on the glenoid. Increasing the joint compressive load to 111 N resulted in a reduction of mean inferior translation from 11.0 mm to 2.0 mm at 0 degree abduction, from 21.5 mm to 1.4 mm at 45 degrees abduction, and from 4.5 mm to 1.2 mm at 90 degrees abduction. With a compressive load of 111 N, venting the capsule or sectioning of glenohumeral ligaments had no effect on inferior stability. Clinical relevance: Glenohumeral joint compression through muscle contraction provides stability against inferior translation of the humeral head, and this effect is more important than negative intraarticular pressure or ligament tension.     

Brachial plexus neuropathy (stinger syndrome) occurring in a patient with shoulder laxity

The stinger syndrome is a common neuropathy caused by traction or compression of the brachial plexus. In general, it is seen in young adults involved in sport activities and a major contact trauma is the rule. An 11-year-old boy with bilateral glenohumeral joint laxity had pain in the left shoulder, numbness and decreased strength in the left arm that developed after striking against a wall while running, with the left shoulder in extension and the neck in minimal lateral flexion to the contralateral side. Physical examination showed extreme anteroinferior passive translocation of the humeral head in neutral rotation and a positive sulcus sign in the left shoulder. The diagnosis was made as brachial plexus neuropathy (stinger syndrome) resulting from traction trauma and shoulder joint laxity and a shoulder-arm brace was applied. After two weeks, atrophy was detected in the right deltoid, supraspinatus, and infraspinatus muscles, and active and passive motion exercises of the shoulder were initiated. At the end of three months, he achieved normal range of motion of the shoulder and muscle strength.     

Influence of humeral prosthesis height on biomechanics of glenohumeral abduction. An in vitro study

BACKGROUND: During shoulder replacement surgery, the normal height of the proximal part of the humerus relative to the tuberosities frequently is not restored because of differences in prosthetic geometry or problems with surgical technique. The purpose of the present study was to determine the effect of humeral prosthesis height on range of motion and on the moment arms of the rotator cuff muscles during glenohumeral abduction. METHODS: Tendon excursions and abduction angles were recorded simultaneously in six cadaveric specimens during passive glenohumeral abduction in the scapular plane. Moment arms were calculated for each muscle by computing the slope of the tendon excursion-versus-glenohumeral abduction angle relationship. The experiments were carried out with the intact joint and after replacement of the humeral head with a prosthesis that was inserted in an anatomically correct position as well as 5 and 10 mm too high. RESULTS: Insertion of the prosthesis in positions that were 5 and 10 mm too high resulted in significant and marked reductions of the maximum abduction angle of 10 degrees (range, 5 degrees to 18 degrees ) and 16 degrees (range, 12 degrees to 20 degrees ), respectively. In addition, the moment arms of the infraspinatus and subscapularis decreased by 4 to 10 mm. This corresponded to a 20% to 50% decrease of the abduction moment arms of the infraspinatus and an approximately 50% to 100% decrease of the abduction moment arms of the subscapularis, depending on the abduction angle and the part of the muscle being considered. CONCLUSIONS: If a humeral head prosthesis is placed too high relative to the tuberosities, shoulder function is impaired by two potential mechanisms: (1) the inferior capsule becomes tight at lower abduction angles and limits abduction, and (2) the center of rotation is displaced upward in relation to the line of action of the rotator cuff muscles, resulting in smaller moment arms and decreased abduction moments of the respective muscles. Clinical Relevance: In patients managed with shoulder replacement surgery, limitation of range of motion, loss of abduction strength, and overload with long-term failure of the supraspinatus tendon are potential consequences of positioning the humeral head of the prosthesis proximal to the anatomic position.