经腹腹膜前腹腔镜疝修补术治疗腹股沟复发疝

目的：探讨经腹腹膜前腹腔镜疝修补术（ transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal herniorrhaphy ,TAPP）在治疗腹股沟复发疝中的效果。方法回顾性分析我院2010年6月～2013年12月TAPP治疗腹股沟复发疝28例的临床资料。单侧疝25例,双侧疝3例（2例为术中发现）。斜疝13例,直疝15例。结果28例均获成功,无中转手术。手术时间（60＆#177;15） min,术中出血量（30＆#177;5）ml,术后住院时间（4＆#177;1）d。3例术后腹股沟区轻微疼痛不适,口服非甾体止疼药后缓解;4例血清肿,2例自行吸收,2例经多次穿刺抽液后治愈。随访时间1～24个月,平均17个月,其中20例＞12个月,均未见复发。结论 TAPP治疗腹股沟复发疝避免了传统前入路的解剖复杂性,手术安全、有效。     

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗腹股沟复发疝30例效果分析

目的探讨腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)治疗腹股沟复发疝的效果。方法回顾性分析2017-12—2019-06间在郑州市第七人民医院普外科接受TAPP治疗的30例腹股沟复发疝患者的临床及随访资料。结果 30例患者均成功完成TAPP。手术时间(48.20±6.40)min,术后下床活动时间(16.16±3.18)h,住院时间(5.70±2.10) d。术后出现尿潴留2例,阴囊血清肿1例,未发生切口感染、异物反应、顽固性疼痛等并发症。术后随访6～24个月,无复发病例。结论腹腔镜TAPP治疗腹股沟复发疝,创伤小、并发症少,术后恢复快、复发率低,但远期效果仍需更长时间的随访结果予以验证。     

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术与开放无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟斜疝临床对比研究

目的 探讨腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)与开放无张力疝修补术(OTFH)治疗腹股沟斜疝(斜疝)的临床效果.方法 前瞻性纳入2018-06—2019-11间固始县人民医院普外科行斜疝修补的患者,依据手术方法分为TAPP组和OTFH组.比较2组患者的基线资料、术中情况、术后临床指标.统计2组患者术前和术后24 h的血清...     

开放无张力疝修补术与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝效果分析

目的比较开放无张力疝修补术(OTFH)与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)治疗腹股沟疝的效果。方法按不同手术方法将94例腹股沟疝患者分为2组,各47例。对照组行OTFH,观察组行TAPP,比较2组手术效果。结果观察组手术时间、术中出血量及术后首次下床时间、胃肠道恢复时间、并发症发生率和住院时间等指标,均优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论与OTFH比较,TAPP治疗腹股沟疝,创伤小,并发症发生率低,术后恢复时间短,效果更为理想。     

腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝

目的探讨腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的效果。方法选取2016-01—2018-10间收治的121例成人腹股沟疝患者,按手术方式的不同分为2组。对照组(60例)行腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP),观察组(61例)实施腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)。比较2组的疗效。结果观察组术中失血量少于对照组,手术时间、住院时间、术后肛门恢复排气时间短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);2组并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。随访6个月,2组患者均未出现复发病例。结论 TAPP和TEP治疗成人腹股沟疝均有确切效果,其中TEP创伤小,有利于患者术后恢复。     

腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术与经腹腹膜前疝修补术的临床疗效对比

目的:探讨腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术(totally extraperitoneal,TEP)与经腹腹膜前疝修补术(transabdominal preperitoneal,TAPP)的临床应用价值。方法:选取2012年6月至2013年12月收治的90例腹股沟疝患者。随机分为TEP组与TAPP组。对比分析两组患者的手术时间、术后疼痛时间、住院时间、住院费用、并发症发生情况及复发例数等。结果:与TAPP组相比,TEP组手术时间、术后疼痛时间及住院时间明显缩短,且住院费用明显降低,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。两组阴囊血清肿、术后暂时性神经感觉异常及尿潴留等并发症发生率、腹股沟疝复发率差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:对于腹股沟疝患者而言,TEP可进一步缩短术后疼痛时间,减轻患者的经济负担,但对术者的操作熟练程度要求较高,有待进一步推广应用。     

纵向腹膜切开法在经腹腹膜前无张力疝修补术中的应用

目的:通过比较纵向与横向法切开腹膜在经腹腹膜前无张力疝修补术(TAPP)中的手术效果,探讨纵向切开腹膜法的应用价值。方法:采用前瞻性研究方法,将2020年11月至2022年7月62例腹股沟疝、股疝患者按手术顺序单侧依次分入纵向切开组(纵切组)与横向切开组(横切组),对比分析两组手术时间、分离腹膜前间隙时间、放置补片时间、缝合腹膜时间、精索输精管损伤率及术后血清肿发生率、复发率。结果:纵切组与横切组手术时间[(71.24±20.11)min vs.(70.97±25.81)min,P>0.05]、放置补片时间[(13.58±4.49)min vs.(13.09±4.33)min,P>0.05]差异无统计学意义,分离腹膜前间隙时间[(34.42±11.36)min vs.(26.13±11.82)min,P<0.05]、缝合腹膜时间[(14.48±5.19)min vs.(22.72±8.27)min,P<0.05]差异有统计学意义,纵切组精索输精管损伤率低于横切组,差异有统计学意义(P=0.027),两组术后血清肿发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后...     

成人腹股沟斜疝腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术的治疗效果研究

目的 探讨成人腹股沟斜疝腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)的治疗效果.方法 回顾性分析2018-10—2019-10间在平顶山市第一人民医院普外科行疝修补术治疗的79例成人腹股沟斜疝患者的临床资料.按手术方法分为TAPP组(40例)和开放无张力疝修补术组(OTFH组,39例).比较2组患者的基线资料、术中情况和术后临...     

Transabdominal preperitoneal versus totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis of randomized studies

Background

The aim of the present study was to comparatively evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair and totally extraperitoneal repair.

Methods

The electronic databases of Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched, and a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials was undertaken.

Results

Seven studies comprising 516 patients with 538 inguinal hernia defects were identified. A shorter recovery time (P = .02) was found for totally extraperitoneal repair in comparison with transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (weighted mean difference = −.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], −.71 to .07) although the length of hospitalization (P = .89) was similar in the 2 treatment arms (weighted mean difference = .01; 95% CI, −.13 to .15). Operative morbidity (P = .004) was higher for the preperitoneal approach (odds ratio = 2.15; 95% CI, 1.29 to 3.61). No differences were found with regard to the incidence of recurrence, long-term neuralgia, and operative time.

Conclusions

Current evidence suggests similar operative results for endoscopic and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, with a trend toward higher morbidity for the preperitoneal approach. Randomized trials with a longer-term follow-up are needed in order to assess the effect of each approach on the prevention of recurrence.     

腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前网片植入术治疗腹股沟疝

目的探讨腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前网片植入术(transabdominalpreperitonealpatchrepair,TAPP)治疗腹股沟疝的手术特点及疗效。方法回顾性分析1998年3月~2005年11月82例TAPP的临床资料。结果82例TAPP均获成功,无一例中转开腹手术。手术时间(57.5±16.7)min(34~126min)。手术后阴囊血肿1例,无其他并发症。术后不用镇痛剂。下床活动时间(1.8±0.5)d(1~3d),术后住院(6.6±0.8)d(3~9d)。随访时间>1年者58例,无一例复发。结论腹腔镜TAPP采用后入路途径,遵循疝修补无张力原则,复发率低,是诊治腹股沟疝的有效手段。     

腹腔镜完全腹膜外与经腹腹膜前疝修补术临床对照分析

目的比较腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)和腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)治疗腹股沟疝的安全性和有效性。方法回顾性分析2003年1月至2004年6月TEP 30例(36例次)以及同期TAPP 61例(64例次)临床资料。比较两组平均手术时间、术后平均住院时间、术后并发症、术后复发以及治疗费用。结果平均手术时间和术后住院时间TEP组分别为(58.33±13.60)m in和(5.23±1.85)d,TAPP组为(63.28±20.04)m in和(5.87±1.52)d,两者差异无显著性(P>0.05)。术后并发症TEP组5例,TAPP组13例,两组差异无显著性(P>0.05)。术后平均随访时间TEP组13(3~21)个月,TAPP组为14(4~23)个月;TEP组无复发病例,TAPP组有2例复发。平均手术费用TEP组为(6 359.32±596.86)元,TAPP组为(8 298.18±713.83)元,两者差异有显著性(P<0.01)。结论TEP与TAPP治疗腹股沟疝均安全有效;TEP相对TAPP手术费用更低,临床推广更具优势。     

腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的经验总结(附235例报告)

目的:评价腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的安全性和有效性,分析术后复发与并发症的原因;比较经腹腹膜前补片植入术(TAPP)与全腹膜外补片植入术(TEP)的手术疗效。方法:回顾性分析1997年1月至2005年1月行腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的235例(274例次)病人的临床资料,其中TAPP139例(163例次),TEP96例(111例次),随访时间1～24个月(中位时间15个月)。结果:手术无中转,术后复发率为1.46%(4/274),前3位并发症依此为血清肿5.11%(14/274),暂时性神经感觉异常4.74%(13/274)和尿潴留2.92%(8/274);平均手术时间为(57.1±18.6)min(25～140min),术后平均住院天数为(5.84±1.44)d,2周和4周内恢复非限制性活动人数分别为96.2%(226/235)和100%,术后无需应用镇痛剂;TAPP与TEP在手术时间、复发率、并发症率、术后住院天数、恢复非限制性活动时间上差异无显著性(P>0.05);Ⅲ型疝的血清肿发生率高于其他各型(P=0.041)。结论:TAPP和TEP都是安全有效的无张力修补方法,手术效果及术式选择取决于术者的临床经验。     

Total extraperitoneal preperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair using spinal anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy is a well-debated approach to inguinal hernia repair. Multiple technical and outcome variables have been compared with those of traditional open inguinal hernia repairs. One of these variables is the choice of anesthesia. To date, no reports describe the use of spinal anesthesia for laparoscopic hernia repairs. We present herein a review of our experience with spinal anesthesia for the total extraperitoneal preperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair (TEP). METHODS: We prospectively reviewed 30 patients undergoing TEP while under spinal anesthesia. Methods of anesthesia, surgical procedure, operative and anesthesia delivery times, as well as outcomes were reviewed. Patients were followed up over a 2-year period. Short- and long-term results of the surgical procedure and anesthesia delivered were noted. RESULTS: All patients underwent successful laparoscopic hernia repair while under spinal anesthesia without conversion to general anesthesia. Forty-four hernias were repaired in 30 patients. Short- and long-term follow-up (2 years) revealed no significant untoward affects from the spinal anesthesia in this series of patients. Aside from inguinodynia in 3 patients in the short-term, no other short-term or long-term untoward sequelae occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal anesthesia is a feasible, and in our experience, the preferable method of anesthesia for total extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair.     

Resident training experience with robotic assisted transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair

BackgroundGeneral surgery is the fastest growing field in the adoption of robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery. Here, we present the results of one institution’s experience in training surgical residents in robotic assisted transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repairs.MethodsData were prospectively collected on patients undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with residents. Data points included patient age, gender, complications, hernia difficulty, resident technical competency as measured by GEARS, Zwisch scores, operative time, and the number of robotic console cases reported by residents as primary surgeon.ResultsResidents who performed >30 robotic cases had significantly higher mean modified GEARS scores (p ≤ .002). Residents who completed 10 or fewer robotic cases achieved significantly lower mean modified GEARS and Zwisch scores than those who completed 11 or more (p < .001).ConclusionsResident competency and autonomy improve with increasing total robotic case load. Attending surgeons grant more autonomy to residents with higher competency scores.     

Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair versus anterior preperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is still not the gold standard for repair although mesh implantation is unequivocally accepted as an integral part of any groin hernia repair. The aim of the study was to compare the results of anterior preperitoneal (APP) mesh repair with totally extra peritoneal (TEP) repair for inguinal hernias. The prospective study was conducted on 241 patients with 247 hernias (from January 2000 to June 2004). Anterior preperitoneal repair was done in 121 patients and 120 patients were subjected to TEP repair. Repair in both groups was done by using Prolene mesh of size 6×4 in. or 6×6 in. intraoperative and postoperative parameters and complications were recorded and the patients were followed up to 1 year post-surgery. For both unilateral and bilateral inguinal hernias, mean operative time was significantly more in patients of TEP repair as compared to APP repair (P<0.001) and significantly more patients had peritoneal tears in the TEP group (P<0.001). Patients undergoing TEP repair, however, had significantly less postoperative pain (P<0.05) and postoperative hospital stay (P<0.05) and return to work was significantly earlier is this group (P<0.01 and P<0.001). There was no difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups. Patients with inguinal hernias undergoing laparoscopic repair recover more rapidly, and have less incidence of postoperative pain. But it takes significantly more time to perform than APP repair and also the incidence of peritoneal tear is higher.     

Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair. A 7-year two-center experience in 3017patients

BACKGROUND: This report reviews our experience with 3530 transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repairs in 3017 patients (513 bilateral) over the 7-year period from May 1992 to July 1999. We have continually audited our practice and modified the techniques in response. METHODS: Unless contraindicated, laparoscopic TAPP repair is considered the procedure of choice at our institution for all reducible inguinal hernias. We initially stapled an 11 x 6 cm polypropylene mesh in the preperitoneal space but now place a 15 x 10 cm mesh in the preperitoneal space with sutured peritoneal closure. RESULTS: There have been a total of 22 recurrences, of which 17 were identified in the first 325 repairs (5%) using the 11 x 6 cm mesh. Five recurrences occurred in the later 3205 repairs (0.16%) (median follow up of 45 months). There was one 30-day death unrelated to the procedure. There have been seven conversions (four due to irreducibility, two due to extensive adhesions, one due to bleeding). Bladder perforations have occurred in seven cases, of which six were recognized immediately and treated laparoscopically without sequelae. There have been seven cases of small bowel obstruction from herniation through the peritoneal closure. Sutured repair of the peritoneum has reduced the incidence of this complication. Four patients had mesh infections, of whom three were treated conservatively. The incidence of postoperative seroma and hematoma was 8%. Median operation time remains at 40 min with a mean hospitalization of 0.9 nights. Sixty percent of TAPP hernia repairs are now performed on the Day Surgical Unit with a 3% admission rate. Median return to normal activities is 7 days. Forty percent of patients require no postoperative analgesia. These figures remain the same whether the hernia is primary, recurrent, unilateral, or bilateral. Consultants performed most operations early in the series, but latterly surgical trainees have performed the majority of these procedures under supervision. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic TAPP hernia repair is technically difficult, but in the hands of a well-trained surgeon, it is safe and effective with a high degree of patient satisfaction. The low recurrence rate compares favorably to other tension-free mesh hernia repairs.     

重要作用(附66例报道)腹膜前间隙在腹腔镜TAPP及TEP疝修补术中的

目的探讨腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)和全腹膜外(TEP)疝修补术中腹膜前间隙的重要性。方法回顾性分析2008年1月至2011年4月期间笔者所在医院实施腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术66例(78侧)患者的临床资料。结果本组行TAPP疝修补术16例(20侧),TEP疝修补术50例(58侧)。3例TEP疝修补术中转行TAPP疝修补术。单侧手术时间(86.92±36.38)min,术中出血(6.08±3.43)ml。术后并发症发生率为16.7%(11/66),其中术后浆液肿3例,修补区暂时性神经感觉异常3例,阴囊气肿2例,尿潴留2例,肠梗阻1例。复发2例。术后住院时间(4.52±0.99)d。出院后(10.32±1.86)d恢复日常活动和工作。66例均获随访,随访时间(18.56±1.96)个月(1～38个月),未观察到补片感染、慢性疼痛、睾丸萎缩等并发症。结论熟悉和掌握腹腔镜下腹膜前间隙及其重要结构,是避免腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术术中及术后并发症发生的关键。     

腹腔镜腹膜前补片修补术治疗复发性腹股沟疝24例经验

目的分析总结腹股沟疝术后复发的原因,探讨腹腔镜腹膜前补片修补术(transabdominal approach with stapled preperitoned mesh repair,TAPP)治疗复发性腹股沟疝的临床应用价值.方法回顾性分析我院1998年6月～2003年10月收治24例腹股沟复发疝进行TAPP的临床资料,其中直疝11例,斜疝13例.结果24例手术全部成功,无中转开放手术.手术时间47～128 min,平均69 min,术后住院2～5 d,平均3 d.术后6例出现尿潴留,留置尿管1～3 d后拔除,无切口感染、阴囊血肿、积气等并发症.24例随访2个月～5年6个月,平均2年3个月,无一例复发.结论腹腔镜行复发性腹股沟疝TAPP修补术创伤小,并发症少,是治疗复发性腹股沟疝安全、可靠的手术方法.