雷珠单抗治疗不同疾病所致黄斑水肿的疗效观察

目的：探讨玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗治疗因糖尿病、视网膜静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿的安全及有效性。方法：选取2013-06/2016-02在北京航天中心医院眼科因糖尿病继发黄斑水肿( DME )和视网膜静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿( RVO-ME)收治入院,并符合本研究纳入及排除标准的患者35例38眼,其中DME 23眼,RVO-ME 15眼。患眼接受玻璃体腔雷珠单抗(0.5mg/0.05mL)注射治疗,治疗前和治疗后1、3d,1wk、1mo定期门诊回访观察最佳矫正视力( BCVA )、黄斑中心凹厚度( CRT )、眼压。比较雷珠单抗治疗DME及RVO-ME前后的疗效。结果：DME组及RVO-ME组治疗后1、3d,1wk的BCVA均较治疗前提高,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),而两组1 mo的BCVA与治疗前相比差异均无统计学意义( P>0.05)。 DME组及RVO-ME组治疗后1、3d,1wk,1mo的CRT均较治疗前明显改善,差异均有统计学意义( P<0.05)。在BCVA及CRT方面比较,雷珠单抗对于RVO-ME及 DME疗效差异无统计学意义( P >0.05)。结论：玻璃体腔注射雷珠单抗对DME及RVO-ME的治疗均安全有效。     

Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) in the treatment of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE: To report the authors' experience after intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin, Genentech) injection in patients with macular edema (ME) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusive disease (BRVO). METHODS: A consecutive retrospective review of patients with ME secondary to BRVO who were treated with intravitreal bevacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 mL). Patients underwent complete ophthalmic evaluation, which included nonstandardized Snellen visual acuity testing, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and/or angiographic testing at baseline and follow-up visits. RESULTS: There were 27 consecutive patients who received intravitreal bevacizumab injections. The mean length of follow-up was 5.3 months (median 6 months, range 3-8 months). The mean visual acuity improved from 20/200(-) at baseline to 20/100(-) at 1 month and 20/100(+) at 3 months and last follow-up (P < 0.001). The mean central 1 mm macular thickness was 478 microm at baseline and decreased to 310, 336, and 332 microm at 1 month, 3 months, and last follow-up (P < 0.001). Patients received an average of two injections (range one to three). No adverse side effects were observed following injections. CONCLUSION: The observed anatomic (by ophthalmic examination, OCT, and/or fluorescence angiography) and visual acuity improvements and lack of serious adverse side effects after intravitreal bevacizumab injection demonstrates, in principle, the potential of bevacizumab for the treatment of ME in this setting.     

Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) therapy for persistent diffuse diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of bevacizumab (Avastin; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA) for the treatment of diabetic macular edema. METHODS: This prospective, consecutive, noncomparative case series included 51 consecutive patients (26 females and 25 males; mean age, 64 years) with diffuse diabetic macular edema. Inclusion criteria were determined independently of the size of edema, retinal thickness, visual acuity, age, metabolic control, type of diabetes, or previous treatments beyond a 6-month period. At each visit, patients underwent complete eye examination, including determination of best-corrected visual acuity, slit-lamp examination, intraocular pressure measurement, stereoscopic biomicroscopy of the macula, retinal thickness measurement by optical coherence tomography, fluorescein angiography, and fundus photography. After written informed consent was obtained, all patients were treated with a 0.05-mL injection containing 1.25 mg of bevacizumab. RESULTS: All patients completed 6 weeks of follow-up; 23 (45%) completed 12 weeks of follow-up. Sixteen patients (70%) had received at least two intravitreal injections. All patients had undergone previous treatments, such as focal laser therapy (35%), full-scatter panretinal laser therapy (37%), vitrectomy (12%), and intravitreal injection of triamcinolone (33%). The mean diameter of the foveal avascular zone was 503 micro m, with 49% with values of >500 micro m. At baseline, mean visual acuity +/- SD was 25.88 +/- 14.43 ETDRS letters (0.86 +/- 0.38 logMAR of Snellen letters). Mean central retinal thickness by optical coherence tomography +/- SD was 501 +/- 163 micro m (range, 252-1,031 micro m). Mean visual acuity +/- SD increased to 0.75 +/- 0.37 logMAR of Snellen letters at 6 weeks after injection (P = 0.001), with some regression to 0.84 +/- 0.41 logMAR of Snellen letters after 12 weeks. Changes in ETDRS letters were not significant throughout follow-up. Mean retinal thickness +/- SD decreased to 425 +/- 180 micro m at 2 weeks (P = 0.002), 416 +/- 180 micro m at 6 weeks (P = 0.001), and 377 +/- 117 micro m at 12 weeks (P = 0.001). Changes of retinal thickness and visual acuity correlated weakly (r = -0.480 and P = 0.03 at 6 weeks; r = -0.462 and P = 0.07 at 12 weeks). The increase of visual acuity after 6 weeks as measured by ETDRS charts could be predicted best by baseline visual acuity. No other factors investigated, such as age, thickness by optical coherence tomography, or previous treatments, were predictive for the increase in visual acuity. CONCLUSION: Even in cases of diffuse diabetic macular edema not responding to previous treatments such as photocoagulation, intravitreal injection of triamcinolone, or vitrectomy, improvement of visual acuity and decrease of retinal thickness could be observed after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab. Although our follow-up period was too short to provide specific treatment recommendations, the short-term results encourage further prospective studies with different treatment groups and longer follow-up.     

Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) treatment of macular edema in central retinal vein occlusion: a short-term study

PURPOSE: To report the short term anatomic and visual acuity response after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (Avastin, Genentech) in patients with macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective study of patients with macular edema due to CRVO who were treated with at least one intravitreal injection of bevacizumab 1.25 mg in 0.05 mL. Patients underwent Snellen visual acuity testing, optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging, and ophthalmoscopic examination at baseline and follow-up visits. RESULTS: There were 16 eyes of 15 consecutive patients with a mean age of 76.1 years (SD 9.8 years). Intravitreal triamcinolone had been previously administered to 9 patients, but all of these patients either had no improvement or had excessive intraocular pressure caused by the triamcinolone. The patients received a mean of 2.8 injections of bevacizumab per eye. No adverse events were observed, including endophthalmitis, clinically evident inflammation, increased intraocular pressure, retinal tears, retinal detachment, or thromboembolic events in any patient. The mean central macular thickness at baseline was 887 microm and decreased to a mean of 372 microm at month 1 (P < 0.001). The mean baseline acuity was 20/600 (logMAR = 1.48) and the mean acuity at month 1 was 20/200 (logMAR = 1.05), a difference that was highly significant (P = 0.001). At last follow-up, a mean of 3 months after the first injection, the mean visual acuity was 20/138 (logMAR = 0.84), which was significantly better than baseline (P < 0.001). Visual acuity improvement, defined as a halving of the visual angle, was seen in 14 of the 16 eyes. CONCLUSION: Initial treatment results of patients with macular edema secondary to CRVO did not reveal any short-term safety concerns. Intravitreal bevacizumab resulted in a significant decrease in macular edema and improvement in visual acuity. The number of patients in this pilot study was limited and the follow-up is too short to make any specific treatment recommendations, but the favorable short-term results suggest further study is needed.     

Improvement of visual acuity based on optical coherence tomography patterns following intravitreal bevacizumab treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema

AIM:To report the visual outcome based on various patterns of optical coherence tomography (OCT) morphology in diabetic macular edema (DME), following treatment with anti-VEGF intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injection.METHODS:Sixty-seven consecutive subjects with centre involving DME underwent intravitreal injection of Bevacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) in this retrospective, comparative, non randomized study. The DME was classified into one of four categories:focal, diffuse, focal cystoid and neurosensory detachment based on OCT. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), macular appearance, and OCT findings were used to decide whether the subject should have a repeat injection of intravitreal bevacizumab. Outcome measures were a change in mean BCVA (Snellen converted to logMAR) and central macular thickness (CMT) in each group during the six month follow-up period.RESULTS:The mean BCVA improved to logMAR 0.23 at final follow-up from a baseline of 0.32 logMAR (P=0.040) in the focal group, logMAR 0.80 at final follow-up from a baseline of 0.82 logMAR (P=0.838) in the diffuse group, worsened to logMAR 0.53 at final follow-up from a baseline of 0.43 logMAR (P=0.276) in the focal cystoid group, and improved to logMAR 0.79 at final follow-up from a baseline of 0.93 logMAR (P=0.490) in the neurosensory detachment group. The mean CMT before treatment were 298.8±25.03 μm in the focal group, 310.8±40.6 μm in the diffuse group, 397.15±31.05 μm in the focal cystoid group and 401.03±75.1 μm in the neurosensory detachment group. A mean of 2.05 (range:1-5) injections in the focal group, 1.32 (range:1-2) in the diffuse group, 2.6 (range:1-6) in the focal cystoid group and 2.6 (range:1-6) in the neurosensory detachment group were performed during the six month follow-up period. Following intravitreal bevacizumab treatment, vision improved, remained unchanged or worsened in 11, 7 and 2 subjects in focal group; 11, 9 and 8 in diffuse group; 0, 2 and 4 in focal cystoid group and 5, 5 and 3 subjects respectively in neurosensory detachment group.CONCLUSION:OCT morpholgy patterns in DME may predict the effects of intravitreal bevacizumab treatment, and patients with focal DME are most likely to benefit from the improvent of visual acuity from this treatment.     

Bevacizumab (Avastin) for diabetic macular edema in previously vitrectomized eyes

PURPOSE: To report the visual acuity (VA) and foveal thickness (FT) changes after intravitreal bevacizumab for diabetic macular edema (DME) in previously vitrectomized eyes. DESIGN: Retrospective, noncomparative, interventional case series. METHODS: Medical records of 11 eyes of 10 patients who underwent intravitreal bevacizumab injection for persistent DME were reviewed. This retrospective study included eyes that had persistent DME despite prior pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane removal at our institution with optical coherence tomography (OCT) assessment of DME. All eyes received three intravitreal injections of bevacizumab 1.25 mg/0.05 ml monthly. RESULTS: Mean FT was 408 +/- 77 microm at baseline, 453 +/- 97 microm at three months, and 454 +/- 101 microm at six months (P = .172). Mean Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter scores were 59 +/- 15 (20/80) at baseline, 59 +/- 16 (20/80) at three months, 57 +/- 15 (20/80) at six months (P = .398). CONCLUSION: No change in VA and FT was observed in the short-term after intravitreal bevacizumab for DME in previously vitrectomized eyes.     

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE: Intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide has been advocated to treat exudative diabetic macular edema. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of an intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide as treatment for diffuse diabetic macular edema. METHODS: This study was a retrospective, interventional, clinical case series examining 210 eyes of 174 patients who received an intravitreal injection of 1 or 4 mg of triamcinolone acetonide for treatment of diffuse diabetic macular edema. Inclusion criteria were clinically significant macular edema, visual acuity loss, and leakage shown by fluorescein angiography. Main outcome measures were visual acuity and intraocular pressure. Mean follow-up time +/- SD was 6.6 +/- 3.1 months. RESULTS: In the study group, visual acuity improved significantly (P < 0.001) from a median of 20/200 (mean logMAR, 0.92) at baseline to 20/80 (mean logMAR, 0.82) at 6 months. Mean intraocular pressure +/- SD increased from 15.4 +/- 3.4 mmHg (median, 16 mmHg; range, 6-26 mmHg) to a maximal value of 20.4 +/- 6.2 mmHg (median, 19 mmHg; range, 12-51 mmHg) during the follow-up period. Complications included culture-negative sterile endophthalmitis in six cases and cataract extraction in five eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal injection of 1 to 4 mg of triamcinolone acetonide may benefit patients by improving visual acuity in eyes with clinically significant diabetic macular edema. This study did not provide significant evidence to justify its routine use in clinical practice for all patients with diabetic macular edema. A randomized clinical trial on this issue would provide more conclusive evidence and help identify those patients most likely to benefit from intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide.     

Macular function by multifocal electroretinogram in diabetic macular edema after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess macular function by multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) injection. METHODS: Fifteen eyes of 15 patients with DME scheduled for 4 mg IVTA injection were prospectively recruited. The response to treatment was monitored functionally by visual acuity (VA) measurement and mfERG and anatomically by foveal thickness measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT). The first-order kernel P1 mfERG responses from 0 to 7 degrees (central) and 7 to 25 degrees (peripheral) were grouped and analyzed. Changes in functional parameters (VAs and the P1 mfERG response amplitudes and peak latencies) and morphometric parameters (OCT foveal thickness) in eyes with DME 1 and 3 months after IVTA injection were compared with baseline values by Student t test. RESULTS: The mean baseline logMAR value for VAs of the patients before treatment was 0.49+/-0.26. After treatment, it was 0.27+/-0.23 at 1 month and 0.26+/-0.18 at 3 months, and differences from pretreatment values were significant (for each, p<0.001). There were statistically significant decreases in the mean foveal thickness at 1 and 3 months after treatment compared with pretreatment values (for each, p<0.001). There were also statistically significant increases in the mean P1 response amplitude for both central and peripheral groups at all examinations compared with pretreatment (for each, p<0.001). The mean P1 peak latencies for both the central and peripheral groups were shortened, but not significantly. CONCLUSIONS: As well as the reduction in DME and improvement in VA, IVTA injection improves macular function as assessed by mfERG in diabetic patients.     

玻璃体腔注射Bevacizumab治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞性黄斑水肿(英文)

目的:观察玻璃体腔注射bevacizumab(Avastin)治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞性黄斑水肿的有效性和安全性。方法:观察一组视网膜分支静脉阻塞引起黄斑水肿的连续病例,对其进行玻璃体腔注射bevacizumab(Avastin)后的疗效进行分析。所有患者在治疗开始前以及治疗后随诊时间点均进行完全的眼科相关检查,包括视力测定,OCT和/或FFA检查。结果:对32例患者(32眼)分别至少进行一次玻璃体腔注药(1～3次),术后平均观察时间为4.7mo。平均视力:治疗前为20/200-,治疗后1mo20/100-,治疗后3mo及最近一次检查为20/100+(P<0.01);黄斑中心1mm区厚度:治疗前为483μm,治疗后1,3mo及最近一次分别为275,314和301μm(P<0.01)。没有观察到任何不良副作用。结论:玻璃体腔注射bvacizumab(Avastin)治疗能显著减轻视网膜分支静脉阻塞性黄斑水肿、提高视力且没有不良反应。     

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection as primary treatment for diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of intravitreal triamcinolone injection on the course of diabetic macular edema. METHODS: Forty-eight eyes of 48 diabetic patients were treated with 8 mg of intravitreal triamcinolone injection as the primary therapy for diabetic macular edema. The main outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity, fundus fluorescein angio- graphy, macular edema map values of Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph II (HRT II), and intraocular pressures before and after intravitreal injection. RESULTS: The visual acuity increased in 41 of 48 eyes (85.4%) during a mean follow-up time of 7.5 months. The mean baseline best-corrected logMAR (logarithm of minimal angle of resolution) value for visual acuities of the patients before intravitreal triamcinolone injection was 1.17+/-0.20. After treatment, it was 0.85+/-0.29 at 1 month, 0.73+/-0.30 at 3 months, and 0.74+/-0.31 at 6 months, and the differences were significant when compared with baseline values (for each, p<0.001). The mean edema map values significantly decreased by 36% at the 6-month examinations when compared with preinjection values (p<0.001). Average intraocular pressure rose 24.3%, 29.1%, and 11.8% from baseline at the 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up intervals. Intraocular pressure elevation exceeding 21 mmHg was observed in 8 of 48 eyes (16.6%), but was controlled with topical antiglaucomatous medications in all eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal triamcinolone application provides significant improvement in visual acuity of diabetic patients and clinical course of macular edema, and may therefore be a promising approach in the primary treatment of diabetic macular edema.     

玻璃体内注射康柏西普对糖尿病黄斑水肿患者和继发于视网膜静脉阻塞的黄斑水肿患者的疗效差异

目的 探讨玻璃体内注射康柏西普对糖尿病黄斑水肿(DME)患者和继发于视网膜静脉阻塞(RVO)的黄斑水肿患者的疗效差异。方法 回顾性研究。选取2019年8月至2021年12月在苏州市立医院北区眼科行玻璃体内注射康柏西普治疗的DME患者44例63眼记为DME组,另选取采用同样方法进行治疗的继发于RVO的黄斑水肿患者40例40眼记为RVO组。采用国际标准视力表(小数)检查并记录患者最佳矫正视力(BCVA),采用德国海德堡公司OCT仪进行OCT检查,自动测量患者黄斑中心凹1 mm视网膜厚度并以此作为黄斑中心视网膜厚度(CMT)。所有患者玻璃体内均一次性注射0.05 mL康柏西普(成都康弘生物科技有限公司)。对比分析DME组和RVO组患眼基线特征及康柏西普治疗后7 d疗效差异。结果 DME组患眼基线CMT为(484.94±152.89)μm, RVO组为(582.33±241.57)μm, RVO组基线CMT高于DME组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。DME组患眼基线BCVA为0.31±0.20,RVO组为0.29±0.23,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。注射后7 d, DM...     

玻璃体腔注射曲氨奈德与bevacizumab 治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿疗效比较

目的 对比分析玻璃体腔注射曲氨奈德(TA)与抗血管内皮生长因子单克隆抗体(bevacizumab)治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿(DME)的临床疗效.方法 经眼科常规检查和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)检查确诊,共68例82只眼DME患者纳入观察.患者被分成两组进行玻璃体腔注射TA(4mg/0.1ml)或bevacizumab(1.25mg/0.05ml)治疗.TA组37例45只眼,bevaicizumab组31例37只眼,两组在年龄、糖尿病病程、黄斑水肿病程、最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、中心视网膜厚度(CMT)、眼压等方面均无显著差异.比较治疗后4、8、12周两组间BCVA、CMT、眼压的改变.结果 TA组与bevacizumab组在治疗后4 周、8周、12周时视力差异无统计学意义(t=-0.316,0.896、0.879,P=0.754、0.389、0.384).治疗后4周、12周时,TA组比bevacizumab组黄斑水肿有显著下降(t=-1.892、-3.007,P=0.036、0.004),8周时差异无统计学意义(t=-0.362,P=0.722).眼压在治疗后8周、12周时两组差异有统计学意义(t=2.334、2.600,P=0.026、0.015),TA组眼压明显高于bevacizumab组.结论 玻璃体腔注射TA比bevacizumab更早、更有效地降低糖尿病黄斑水肿,并且维持时间更长,此结果还需大样本、多中心的临床随机对照研究.     

Intravitreal bevacizumab (avastin) injection alone or combined with triamcinolone versus macular photocoagulation as primary treatment of diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE: To report the efficacy of a single intravitreal bevacizumab injection alone or in combination with intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide versus macular laser photocoagulation (MPC) as primary treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: In this randomized, three-arm clinical trial, 103 eyes of 97 patients with clinically significant DME and no previous treatment were enrolled. The eyes were randomly assigned to one of three study arms: the intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) group, patients who received 1.25 mg of intravitreal bevacizumab (37 eyes); the IVB/IVT group, patients who received 1.25 mg of intravitreal bevacizumab and 2 mg of intravitreal triamcinolone (33 eyes); and the MPC group, patients who underwent focal or modified grid laser (33 eyes). Primary outcome measure was change in visual acuity. RESULTS: Visual acuity changes +/- SD at 12 weeks were -0.22 +/- 0.23, -0.13 +/- 0.31, and + 0.08 +/- 0.31 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution in the IVB, IVB/IVT, and MPC groups, respectively. The marginal regression model based on generalized estimating equation analysis demonstrated that the visual acuity changes in the groups were statistically significant at both 6 weeks (P < 0.0001) and 12 weeks (P = 0.024). The significant treatment effect was demonstrated at both 6 weeks and 12 weeks in the IVB group and only at 6 weeks in the IVB/IVT group. Significant central macular thickness (CMT) reduction was observed in eyes in the IVB and IVB/IVT groups only up to 6 weeks; however, CMT changes were not significant in the groups. CONCLUSION: Up to 12 weeks, intravitreal bevacizumab treatment of patients with DME yielded better visual outcome than laser photocoagulation, although it was not associated with a significant decrease in CMT. No further beneficial effect of intravitreal triamcinolone could be demonstrated. Further clinical trials with longer follow-up are required to evaluate the long-term visual outcomes and complication profiles after primary treatment with such medications.     

Visual acuity following intravitreal bevacizumab for macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion

Purpose  

To study prognostic factors for visual acuity (VA) after intravitreal bevacizumab injection (IVB) for macular edema (ME) associated with retinal vein occlusion (RVO), by evaluating the correlation between the final VA and VA at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months after the initial IVB.     

Intravitreal bevacizumab treatment for radiation macular edema after plaque radiotherapy for choroidal melanoma

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of intravitreal bevacizumab treatment on patients with macular edema (ME) due to radiation retinopathy after plaque radiotherapy for choroidal melanoma. METHODS: In this retrospective case series, 10 consecutive patients with ME due to radiation retinopathy after plaque radiotherapy for choroidal melanoma were treated with a single intravitreal injection of bevacizumab. Postinjection best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and mean foveal thickness measured by ocular coherence tomography were the primary outcome measures. RESULTS: The mean BCVA at the time of the diagnosis of choroidal melanoma was 20/25 (range, 20/20 to 20/40). The mean radiation dose to the foveola was 4,323 cGy (range, 1,908-7,975 cGy). Radiation ME developed at a mean of 26 months (range, 17-44 months) after plaque radiotherapy. Choroidal melanoma regressed in all patients, and there were no neovascular sequelae. At the time of radiation ME diagnosis, the mean BCVA was 20/100 (range, 20/40 to 20/200). After bevacizumab injection, the mean BCVA was 20/86 at 6 weeks and 20/95 at 4 months. Mean foveal thickness measured by ocular coherence tomography was 482 microm before injection, 284 microm 6 weeks after injection, and 449 mum 4 months after injection. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal bevacizumab injection decreases mean foveal thickness while only modestly improving BCVA on a short-term basis in patients with radiation-induced ME.     

The effects of intravitreal bevacizumab on patients with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion

Objective: To evaluate the effect of intravitreal bevacizumab on visual acuity (VA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) in patients with macular edema (ME) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).Design: Retrospective review.Participants: The study included 42 patients with ME secondary to BRVO who received intravitreal injections of bevacizumab in 2 referral-based retinal practices in Vancouver, B.C., between November 2005 and July 2006.Methods: We performed a retrospective review of consecutive patients with ME secondary to BRVO. All of the patients in this study had nonischemic BRVOs. Patients were all treated with at least 1 bevacizumab injection and were seen at 6- to 8-week intervals for VA testing. Most of the patients also underwent optical coherence tomography (OCT) 2 months and 6 months after treatment. VA and OCT measurements at each follow-up time point were compared with the baseline values.Results: A total of 42 eyes from 42 patients with ME secondary to BRVO were reviewed. The mean VA improved from 20/280 at baseline to 20/180 at first follow-up session (p < 0.04; average follow-up = 42 days) and remained at a similar level, 20/170, through the eighth follow-up session (p < 0.04; average follow-up = 356). The CRT was reduced from a mean of 451 μm (388-512 μm) at baseline to 358 μm (298-418 μm) at 2 months (p < 0.02) and to 400 μm (335-465 μm) at 6 months postinjection (p < 0.068).Conclusions: We found a significant improvement in VA and CRT in patients with ME secondary to BRVO after intravitreal bevacizumab injection(s). No complications or serious side effects were observed. Intravitreal bevacizumab appears to have an emerging role as either a primary or an adjuvant treatment modality in the setting of ME secondary to BRVO.     

Follow-up after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE: To report on the follow-up of patients who received an intravitreal high-dosage injection of triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) as treatment of diffuse diabetic macular edema. METHODS: The clinical interventional case-series study included 109 eyes (90 patients) with diffuse diabetic macular edema who consecutively received an IVTA of about 20 mg. Mean follow-up was 11.2 +/- 6.2 months. RESULTS: Visual acuity improved significantly (p<0.001) from 0.89 +/- 0.33 logMAR to a best minimum of 0.65 +/- 0.35 logMAR. An increase in best visual acuity by at least 1 Snellen line, 2 lines, and 3 lines was found in 91 (83%) eyes, 68 (62%) eyes, and 45 (41%) eyes, respectively. Differences in visual acuity between baseline and follow-up examinations were significant for measurements performed at 1 month (p<0.001), 2 months (p<0.001), 3 months (p<0.001), and at 6 months (p=0.001) after the injection. At 9 months after the injection, mean visual acuity regressed significantly so that visual acuity at 9 months (p=0.83) and at 12 months after the injection (p=0.58) compared with baseline values did not differ significantly. Forty-seven (43%) eyes developed a rise in intraocular pressure (pressure >21 mmHg) for 6 to 8 months after the injection. No other severe complications were detected. CONCLUSIONS: The duration of a visual acuity increase and intraocular pressure rise after high-dosage IVTA in diffuse diabetic macular edema is about 6 to 8 months. Compared with data in the literature, the high-dosage IVTA may not have a markedly higher profile of side effects than low-dosage IVTA.     

Clinical,anatomical, and electrophysiological assessments of the central retina following intravitreal bevacizumab for macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term visual, anatomical and electrophysiological outcomes of repeated intravitreal injections of bevacizumab for macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and investigate any possible toxic effects on the central fovea. This is a prospective, noncomparative, interventional case series. Thirty-three eyes of 33 patients with macular edema secondary to RVO were treated with 1.25 mg/0.05 ml intravitreal bevacizumab. Nine patients had nonischemic central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and 24 patients had branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). The main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity, central retinal thickness (CRT), and multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) responses changes at baseline, 1 month after the third injection and at the end of the 2-year long follow-up period. Patients with CRVO had mean best-corrected Snellen visual acuity of 0.10 at baseline, which improved significantly to 0.31 after 2 years (P = 0. 028).The mean CRT at presentation was 756.28 μm and reduced significantly to 439.14 μm after 2 years (P = 0.05). Patients with BRVO had mean best-corrected Snellen visual acuity of 0.19 at baseline, which improved significantly to 0.40 after 2 years (P < 0.001). The mean CRT at presentation was 681.04 μm and reduced significantly to 369.81 μm after 2 years (P < 0.001). Mean mfERG responses within central 10° (ring1, ring2) showed statistically significant differences on P1 parameters in terms of response density and implicit time after 2 years in both CRVO and BRVO patients. Repeated intravitreal bevacizumab injections for macular edema due to either CRVO or BRVO resulted in long-term improvement of visual acuity, a reduction in CRT and statistically significant changes in the mfERG responses with nondemonstrable toxic effects on the central fovea.     

玻璃体内注射阿柏西普治疗顽固性糖尿病黄斑水肿的疗效

目的　研究玻璃体内注射阿柏西普治疗顽固性糖尿病黄斑水肿的短期效果。方法　收集2018年6月至2019年6月来我院眼科就诊的顽固性糖尿病黄斑水肿患者30例（30眼）,行玻璃体内注射阿柏西普治疗。治疗前所有患者均接受过至少3次的玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗治疗,随访期为1个月。在术前及术后1个月时,检查患者最佳矫正视力(best corrected vision acuity,BCVA)和眼压,并行黄斑区光学相干断层成像检查,记录黄斑中心区厚度（central macular thickness,CMT）。比较治疗前后各组数据差异。结果　BCVA从阿柏西普治疗前的（0.61±0.26）logMAR提升至治疗后1个月的（0.51±0.19）logMAR,差异有统计学意义(P=0.016)。治疗前CMT为（441.77±108.09）μm,治疗后1个月CMT为（354.47±83.93）μm,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。治疗前及治疗后 1个月眼压相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。在随访期间未发现任何眼部及全身相关并发症。结论　对于雷珠单抗不应答的顽固性糖尿病黄斑水肿患者,转为阿柏西普治疗能在短期内减轻黄斑区水肿程度,提高视力且无并发症的发生。     

Intravitreal triamcinolone for the treatment of ischemic macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) for ischemic macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and foveal ischemia. DESIGN: Prospective interventional case series. METHODS: setting: Clinical practice. study population: Eighteen eyes of 18 patients with macular edema associated with BRVO and foveal ischemia. intervention: Four mg IVTA. main outcome measures: Visual acuity (VA), optical coherence tomography, macular thickness measurements, and treatment-related complications. RESULTS: The mean duration of BRVO before treatment was 14 months. All patients were followed for a minimum of nine months, and 12 patients completed 12 months follow-up. The mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) VA improved significantly from 0.81 +/- 0.36 at baseline to 0.65 +/- 0.30 at one month (P = .03) but did not vary significantly from baseline at three, six, nine, and 12 months. Macular thickness improved significantly in all eyes from a mean of 400 +/- 134 mum preinjection, to 228 +/- 58 mum at one month (P < .01) and 256 +/- 121 mum at three months (P < .01) but did not vary significantly from baseline at six, nine, and 12 months. Eight eyes developed posterior subcapsular cataract, intraocular pressure (IOP) exceeded 21 mm Hg in four eyes, and two eyes developed vitreomacular traction during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: IVTA is effective in reducing ischemic macular edema associated with BRVO and foveal capillary nonperfusion. This reduction is often associated with a temporary improvement in VA. Raised IOP and development of posterior subcapsular cataract are disadvantages of this treatment.