A randomised clinical trial comparing idarubicin and cytarabine to daunorubicin and cytarabine in the treatment of acute non-lymphoid leukaemia

255 patients with acute non-lymphoid leukaemia (ANLL), observed between October 1984 and June 1987, entered a chemotherapy regimen consisting of induction therapy with cytarabine in combination with idarubicin (IDA/ARA) or daunorubicin (DNR/ARA), followed by consolidation with four courses of IDA+ARA plus 6-thioguanine (6-TG) or DNR+ARA+6-TG and a 6 month maintenance therapy with 6-TG and ARA. The median age was 62 years (range 55–78 years) and 33 were aged more than 70 years. The treatment groups were comparable for median age, FAB type, performance status and initial blood counts. 249 patients were randomised, 124 to the IDA/ARA arm and 125 to the DNR/ARA arm. Complete remission was achieved in 50 patients (40%) on the IDA/ARA treatment program and 49 patients (39%) on DNR/ARA. No definite differences were found between patients receiving IDA/ARA and those treated with DNR/ARA as far as complete response (CR), overall survival, failure free and relapse free survival are concerned. 74% of the complete responders in the IDA/ARA arm and 51% in the DNR/ARA arm achieved CR after a single course of treatment. Resistant leukaemia was observed in 13.7% of the patients in the IDA/ARA arm and in 31.2% in the DNR/ARA one, whereas hypoplastic death occurred in 29% and 14.4%, respectively. In conclusion, our data failed to show any advantage of idarubicin over daunorubicin even though there is some evidence that IDA, despite the higher toxicity, is more rapid in eradicating leukaemia as proved by the higher CR rate obtained after one course of induction.     

The effects of postinduction intensification treatment with cytarabine and daunorubicin in adult acute lymphocytic leukemia: a prospective randomized clinical trial by Cancer and Leukemia Group B

Cancer and Leukemia Group B undertook a randomized trial of intensification treatment in adults aged 15 to 79 years with acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) in complete remission (CR). Daunorubicin (DNR), prednisone, vincristine (VCR), intrathecal (IT) methotrexate (MTX), and asparaginase produced 177 CRs in 277 patients. One hundred fifty-one patients were randomly assigned to receive treatment as follows: 74 received intensive cytarabine and DNR, and 77 received cycles of mercaptopurine (6-MP) and MTX, followed by 6MP, MTX, VCR, and prednisone for 3 years in all. One hundred twelve patients received CNS prophylaxis. Intensification produced major myelosuppression but did not improve remission duration (median, 21 months). Of the 151 patients with CRs who entered the intensification phase, 29% remain in continuous CR (43 to 117 months); in 19 patients, CRs have lasted for longer than 7 years. No relapses occurred after 60 months. Median survival from the time of randomization was 30 months. Those under 30 years of age responded more frequently, with longer CR and survival. While 53% of those aged 15 to 19 years remain in continuous CR, 92% of patients over 59 years have relapsed. The presence of a myeloid antigen on the leukemic cells was adversely prognostic for CR achievement and for survival. Pretreatment WBC and platelet levels independently affected CR duration and survival. Early M1 marrow development presaged longer remissions. CNS relapse occurred in 47 of 256 patients with normal CSF before treatment, in 29 before CNS prophylaxis. CNS disease occurred after CNS prophylaxis in 18 patients: 13 of 61 who had received standard premaintenance and five of 51 who received intensification. No advantage in CR duration or survival resulted from intensive treatment with DNR and cytarabine following induction of CR.     

Daunorubicin continuous infusion induces more toxicity than bolus infusion in acute lymphoblastic leukemia induction regimen: a randomized study.

We report the first randomized study assessing the efficacy and safety of daunorubicin (DNR) continuous infusion (CI) compared to the more conventional 30-min infusion (i.v.) in newly diagnosed adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Seventy-seven patients were initially randomized to receive either a 24-h CI DNR (60 mg/m2 days 2-4) (40 patients) or bolus DNR at the same dosage (37 patients) with vincristine (2 mg i.v. days 1, 8, 15) and oral prednisone (60 mg/m2 days 1-15), without hematopoietic growth factor support, as an induction regimen. The distribution of adverse prognostic factors was comparable in the two-induction arm. Acute toxicity was more important in the CI arm. Gram negative infection (9 vs 1 gram negative septicemia, P = 0.01) and infection-related deaths (6 vs 1 deaths, P = NS) occurred more frequently in the CI arm during the induction treatment than in the i.v. arm, leading to the study interruption. Neutropenia but not thrombopenia duration was significantly longer in the CI arm than in the i.v. arm (18 days vs 14 days, P > 0.05 and 16 days vs 12 days, P > 0.05, respectively). Despite a similar CR rate according to the method of DNR administration (68% in the CI DNR arm vs 76% in the i.v. arm after the first course), there was a trend toward higher freedom from relapse (FFR) after DNR CI (48% vs 28% in the i.v. arm at 5 years, P = NS), suggesting that despite this high toxicity, DNR CI may improve the CR quality and decrease further the residual disease.     

Comparative trial of cytarabine and thioguanine in combination with amsacrine or daunorubicin in patients with untreated acute nonlymphocytic leukemia: results of the L-16M protocol

Ninety-six patients with de novo acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (ANLL) were randomized to receive either daunorubicin (50 mg/m2, IV) on days 1-3; cytarabine (Ara-C) (25 mg/m2, IV) bolus, followed by 160 mg/m2 as a continuous IV infusion daily for 5 days and 6-thioguanine (6-TG) (100 mg/m2 po) every 12 hr daily for 5 days (DAT); or amsacrine (190 mg/m2, IV) on days 1-3 with Ara-C and 6-TG at the above doses (AAT). Patients achieving complete remission (CR) then received two courses of consolidation therapy with the same combination that had induced remission but at slightly reduced total doses. Patients less than or equal to age 40 with an HLA-identical sibling donor underwent allogeneic transplantation, usually after consolidation therapy. The remaining patients were then randomized to receive either maintenance therapy (alternating cycles of vincristine/methotrexate, cyclophosphamide/6-TG, daunorubicin/hydroxyurea and Ara-C/6-TG) or no further treatment. Ninety-two patients were evaluable for response. Twenty-five of the 46 patients (54%) who received DAT and 32 of the 46 patients (70%) who received AAT achieved CR (p = 0.13). When patients were stratified by age, however, remission induction advantage with AAT became statistically significant (p = 0.03). Additionally, more patients achieved CR following one course of AAT than following one course of DAT (48% vs 28%, p = 0.03). Overall survival in the AAT group was improved as well (p = 0.01). Too few patients were randomized on the maintenance arm of the protocol to make interpretation meaningful. Non-hematologic toxicity was generally comparable in both arms. In conclusion, patients with de novo ANLL who received AAT had a higher remission incidence and slightly longer survival compared to patients who received DAT. Further investigation of this drug combination in untreated patients with ANLL is warranted.     

Cytotoxic effects of vitamin A in combination with vincristine, daunorubicin and 6-thioguanine upon cells from lymphoblastic leukemic patients

We studied whether isotretinoin potentiated the effects of vincristine (VCR), daunorubicin (DNR), and 6-thioguanine (6-TG) against cells obtained from 24 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Treatment with 5 micrograms/ml isotretinoin alone resulted in a leukemic cell survival of 82% +/- 28.1%. So isotretinoin is toxic to ALL cells. Dose-response curves were obtained for VCR, DNR and 6-TG in the presence and absence of isotretinoin Isotretinoin showed additive leukemic cell kills in combination with VCR and DNR. When corrected for cell kill by isotretinoin alone, it appeared that isotretinoin did not significantly enhance leukemic cell kills by VCR, DNR and 6-TG. No differences were found between samples from patients at initial diagnosis and at relapse with respect to cell kill by isotretinoin alone and with respect to a possible synergistic effect of isotretinoin and the cytostatic drugs. It is concluded that isotretinoin has additive antileukemic effects in combination with VCR or DNR. However, isotretinoin does not potentiate the antileukemic effects of VCR, DNR and 6-TG against leukemic cells obtained from patients with ALL.     

Cytotoxic Effects of Vitamin A in Combination with Vincristine, Daunorubicin and 6-Thioguanine upon Cells from Lymphoblastic Leukemic Patients

We studied whether isotretinoin potentiated the effects of vincristine (VCR), daunorubicin (DNR), and 6-thioguanine (6-TG) against cells obtained from 24 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Treatment with 5 μg /ml isotretinoin alone resulted in a leukemic cell survival of 82%± 28.1%. So isotretinoin is toxic to ALL cells. Dose-response curves were obtained for VCR, DNR and 6-TG in the presence and absence of isotretinoin Isotretinoin showed additive leukemic cell kills in combination with VCR and DNR, When corrected for cell kill by isotretinoin alone, it appeared that isotretinoin did not significantly enhance leukemic cell kills by VCR, DNR and 6-TG. No differences were found between samples from patients at initial diagnosis and at relapse with respect to cell kill by isotretinoin alone and with respect to a possible synergistic effect of isotretinoin and the cytostatic drugs. It is concluded that isotretinoin has additive antileukemic effects in combination with VCR or DNR. However, isotretinoin does not potentiate the antileukemic effects of VCR, DNR and 6-TG against leukemic cells obtained from patients with ALL.     

The role of daunorubicin in induction therapy for adult acute myeloid leukemia

The relationship between the total dose of daunorubicin (DNR) in induction therapy and the treatment outcome were evaluated based upon individualized doses of DNR during induction therapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia(AML). Ninety-two previously untreated adult AML patients admitted to our hospital were analyzed for the dose of DNR required for complete remission (CR), the CR rate, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The induction therapy consisted of DNR (40 mg/m2/d, i.v., from D 1 until the marrow was hypoplastic), Ara-C, prednisolone, and/or 6-thioguanine. Eighty-three out of 92 patients were assessable. Sixty-three patients entered CR (76%), of whom 52 attained CR with the first course of induction therapy. The 10-year DFS and OS rates were 31.2% and 42.3%, respectively. The median total dose of DNR in the induction therapy was 280 mg/m2 (120-480 mg/m2), which was not influenced by initial WBC count, or FAB type. These results indicate that when the dose is linked to the observed tumor response, the optimal dose of DNR in the induction therapy is around 280 mg/m2 (40 mg/m2 x 7 times), which is higher than the conventional dose of 40-60 mg/m2 for 3 days. The higher dose of DNR in the induction therapy for adult AML should be selected when the feasibility of a new drug is evaluated in a randomized trial.     

A comparison of early intensive methotrexate/mercaptopurine with early intensive alternating combination chemotherapy for high-risk B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Pediatric Oncology Group phase III randomized trial.

A prospective, randomized multicenter study was performed to evaluate the relative efficacy of two different concepts for early intensive therapy in a randomized trial of children with B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) at high risk (HR) for relapse. Four hundred and ninety eligible children with HR-ALL were randomized on the Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) 9006 phase III trial between 7 January 1991 and 12 January 1994. After prednisone (PDN), vincristine (VCR), asparaginase (ASP) and daunorubicin (DNR) induction, 470 patients received either 12 intensive parenteral treatments of intermediate dose (1 g/m2 each) methotrexate (MTX) and mercaptopurine (MP) over 24 weeks (regimen A) or 12 intensive course of alternating myelosuppressive drug combinations given over 30 weeks (regimen B). These drug combinations included MTX/MP, teniposide (VM-26)/cytosine arabinoside (AC) and VCR/PDN/DNR/AC/ASP. Central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis was age-adjusted triple intrathecal chemotherapy. Patients with CNS disease at diagnosis were treated with craniospinal irradiation after the intensive phase. Continuation was standard doses of MTX and MP for 2 years. This trial was closed early because of an apparent early difference favoring regimen B. Results show that 470 patients achieved remission (97%). Two hundred and thirty two were randomized to regimen A and 238 to regimen B. The estimated 4-year event-free survival (EFS) for patients treated with regimen A is 61.6 % (s.e. = 3.3%) and with regimen B is 69.4% (s.e. = 3.1%), P = 0.091. Toxicities were more frequent on regimen B. In conclusion, for children with B-precursor ALL at high risk to relapse, early intensification with myelosuppressive combination chemotherapy was more toxic but produced no significant difference in EFS when compared to those treated with parenteral methotrexate and mercaptopurine.     

Intravenous 6-thioguanine or cisplatin, fluorouracil and leucovorin for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II study of the cancer and leukemia group B.

This randomized phase II study was designed to evaluate the activity of intravenous 6-thioguanine (6-TG) as a single agent and the combination of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu) modulated by oral leucovorin (PFL) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Eligible patients had measurable or evaluable stage III B or IV NSCLC, had no received prior chemotherapy and had a performance status of 0-2. Patients were randomized to treatment with intravenous 6-TG at 55 mg/m2 administered over 30 minutes for 5 consecutive days and repeated every 35 days, or PFL chemotherapy with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1, 5-FU 800 mg/m2/day as a continuous intravenous infusion over 5 days and oral leucovorin administered at 100 mg every 4 hours during the entire duration of the cisplatin and 5-FU infusions. PFL was repeated every three weeks. Ninety-five eligible patients were randomized, 46 to 6-TG and 49 to PFL. Response rates were 4% for 6-TG (95% confidence interval 0.5%-14.8%, 1 partial, and 1 complete response) and 29% (16.6%-43.3%) for PFL (all partial). The median time to treatment failure was 2 and 4 months, respectively, and the median survival times were 6 and 10 months, respectively. Toxicities with 6-TG were, generally, mild to moderate but severe or life-threatening granulocytopenia was observed in 21% of patients. With PFL, mucositis was dose-limiting, and 78% of patients had severe or life-threatening mucositis. This led to dose reduction of 5-FU and leucovorin during subsequent cycles or treatment termination in 82% of patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Acute promyelocytic leukemia. Therapy results and prognostic factors

From December 1976 to July 1986, 34 patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) were treated with daunorubicin (DNR) alone and simultaneous supportive therapy with low-dose heparin, platelet transfusions, and fresh frozen plasma. Two consecutive maintenance therapy regimens were employed in patients who achieved complete remission (CR): (1) a classical maintenance with methotrexate and 6-mercaptopurine, with DNR plus methyl-GAG re-inductions; (2) from 1982 an intensive sequential combination therapy regimen was administered. CR was achieved in 23 patients (68%). Only one patient had leukemic resistance. Other failures were a consequence of post-chemotherapy complications. A multivariate logistic regression analysis has been performed to evaluate the prognostic importance on response to remission induction of 25 patient and disease characteristics at diagnosis. The significant variables in decreasing order of significance were: serum albumin level, fever at diagnosis, serum creatinine level, and age. The median duration of remission and survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis were projected to be 24 and 25 months, respectively. Relapses occurred in 11 of 23 CR patients. Nine patients remained in the first remission from 5+ to 37+ months. Short-term (CR) and long-term results (duration of remission and survival) in APL treated for induction with DNR alone were similar to those obtained in other subtypes of acute myeloblastic leukemia by intensive combination chemotherapy.     

A comparison of two regimens for high-risk acute lymphocytic leukemia in childhood. A Pediatric Oncology Group Study

Four hundred thirty patients with high-risk acute lymphoid leukemia were entered on the acute leukemia in childhood protocol (AlinC 12) of the Pediatric Division of the Southwest Oncology Group (now the Pediatric Oncology Group) between 1976 and 1979. This study was a prospective randomized comparison of two regimens that had as their primary differences: (1) an intensification period with Cytoxan (cyclophosphamide) and asparaginase after induction; (2) a period of intravenous methotrexate before initiating maintenance; and (3) in the regimen that had those two additions, triple-drug chemoprophylaxis of the central nervous system (CNS) using methotrexate, hydrocortisone, and cytosine arabinoside as compared to cranial irradiation and intrathecal methotrexate. All patients received vincristine and prednisone induction, 6-mercaptopurine and methotrexate maintenance, and vincristine and prednisone pulse intensification. There was no significant difference in the rate of bone marrow relapse. However, overall disease-free survival favored the arm with intensification and chemoprophylaxis because of a lesser incidence of extramedullary relapse. Thus, for treatment 1 versus treatment 3 the two-sided P values were for overall disease-free survival 0.16; bone marrow relapses 0.13; all CNS relapses 0.04; and all extramedullary disease relapses 0.013. It is concluded that intensification as delivered in this protocol protects against testicular relapse and that chemoprophylaxis is adequate prophylaxis against isolated CNS relapse.     

Combined hepatic artery 5-fluorouracil and irradiation of liver metastases. A randomized study

The effect of hepatic irradiation (RT) after intraarterial 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was evaluated in 37 randomized patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma hepatic metastases. Patients underwent percutaneous transbrachial artery catheterization of the hepatic artery followed by 21-day continuous 5-FU infusion (CT). Hepatic irradiation of 25.5 Gy was delivered to 19 patients 14 days after completion of infusion (CT + RT). All patients received subsequent weekly maintenance 5-FU. A 37% (seven of 19) response rate was observed in CT + RT, and a 50% response rate (nine of 18) in CT: median survival was 6 months for CT + RT, and 8 months for CT, (P = 0.106). Improved survival was observed in two subsets of patients. Tumor vascularity was graded angiographically from 0 to 4+; those patients with highest vascularity (4+) had a 20-month median survival (P = 0.0009). Patients with Grade 1, well-differentiated, histologic type had a median survival of 20 months (P = 0.0001). Four patients with both 4+ vascularity and Grade 1 histologic type had 27.5 months' median survival (P = 0.0019). Age, performance status, elevated liver function tests, previous systemic therapy, and time interval between diagnosis and entry on this study did not impact on survival (P greater than 0.05), nor did these variables eliminate the significance of vascularity and grade (P less than 0.05). Survival after intraarterial 5-FU infusion was not improved by this regimen of sequential external irradiation. Regional therapy may benefit those patients with 4+ vascular tumors and/or well-differentiated tumor grade. Future trials are needed to explore the interaction of halogenated pyrimidines with irradiation and determine whether these prognostic factors can aid in patient selection for regional therapy of hepatic metastases.     

Prospective randomized reappraisal of 5-fluorouracil in metastatic colorectal carcinoma. A comparative trial with 6-thioguanine

In order to redefine the effectiveness of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as palliative therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma, and to compare the effectiveness of 6-thioguanine (6-TG) with that of 5-FU, we studied 176 patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma in a randomized prospective trial (SEG 79G1268 ). The pretreatment performance status of all patients was greater than 50% (ambulatory), and there was an equal distribution of patients with favorable pretreatment characteristics into each of the treatment regimens. Complete responses were only seen to 5-FU, but were obtained in only 3% of instances. The overall complete plus partial response rates were not different for 5-FU (8%) versus 6-TG (3%), or for patients who had shown prior progression on chemotherapy and who then received 6-TG in a nonrandomized fashion (7%). The time to tumor progression on each of the treatment programs was similar, 1.0 months. Survival was also similar in each regimen in the randomized study (6.3 months for 5-FU versus 7.9 months for 6-TG). However, survival was only 4.8 months for patients with previously drug-resistant tumors treated with 6-TG in the nonrandomized arm. In 16 patients failing 6-TG who then received 5-FU, there were no objective responses. Similarly, in patients failing 5-FU on this study who then received 6-TG, there were no responses in nine patients. Dose-limiting toxicity was observed in 40% to 51% of patients, and consisted of myelosuppression, vomiting, or diarrhea. It is concluded that 5-FU is a minimally effective agent in a very small number of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. The drug 6-TG is equally ineffective in this setting. Alternative treatment programs to the systemic use of 5-FU should be considered in patients requiring palliative chemotherapy.     

P-glycoprotein in primary acute myeloid leukemia and treatment outcome of idarubicin/cytosine arabinoside-based induction therapy.

The expression of the drug transport protein, P-glycoprotein (Pgp/MDR1) has been found to be of prognostic significance for the achievement of complete remission (CR) or the duration of survival after daunorubicin (DNR)-containing induction therapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This would suggest that the expression of Pgp in AML is high enough to have significant impact on intracellular DNR concentrations and on clinical therapy failure in AML. Recently, DNR has been replaced in many centers by idarubicin (IDA) as the first choice anthracycline in AML treatment. We have, therefore, performed a study in a group of 98 primary AML patients, who all received IDA, but not DNR during induction therapy in order to determine if the response to IDA-containing induction therapy might be related to the biologic characteristic of Pgp expression in AML. The AML samples were studied for Pgp expression by MRK16 antibody staining and for Pgp activity measured as the modulation of rhodamine 123 uptake by 2 microM PSC 833. No correlation of Pgp with complete response rate, event-free survival or overall survival was found. In addition to Pgp, the expression of another protein that has been implicated by some studies in response failure to DNR-containing therapy, the major vault protein (Mvp/LRP), was studied. This marker did not correlate with CR or survival after IDA-containing therapy. The results of this patient study are consistent with model studies showing that the steady-state cellular accumulation of lipophilic anthracyclines such as IDA are little affected by Pgp. Therefore, putative beneficial effects of the inclusion of PSC 833 in IDA-containing therapy might rather be related to alternative mechanisms than to inhibition of Pgp-mediated IDA efflux.     

The effect of intensive intermittent maintenance therapy in advanced low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

One hundred and eleven patients with low-grade histology non-Hodgkin's lymphoma achieving a restaged complete response to one of three induction therapies on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) protocol EST 2474 were randomized to receive either maintenance treatment with BCNU, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (BCVP) given every 6 weeks for an additional 18 months or no further therapy. Overall toxicity was moderate. The median progression-free survival (PFS) on maintenance therapy was 3.2 years versus 2.0 years for those observed without treatment (P = 0.02). Progression-free survival was significantly shorter for patients with nodular and diffuse pattern (ND), histiocytic or mixed histology compared with pure nodular lymphocytic, or poorly differentiated counterpart (P = 0.0007), thus confirming the prognostic significance of histologic subtypes. However, the overall survival of patients was not improved by maintenance treatment, suggesting that therapy upon relapse was an equally effective alternative clinical strategy.     

Comparison of maintenance treatment regimens for first central nervous system relapse in children with acute lymphocytic leukemia. A Pediatric Oncology Group study

Eighty-seven children with central nervous system (CNS) leukemia were randomized to receive either induction intrathecal chemotherapy (ITC) and cranial irradiation (CRT) plus maintenance ITC, or induction ITC and craniospinal irradiation (CSpRT) with no maintenance ITC. ITC consisted of six weekly injections of methotrexate, hydrocortisone, and arabinosylcytosine. Also, intensification of systemic induction and maintenance chemotherapy was given. CRT + ITC was given as CRT, 2400 rad in 12 fractions followed by ITC maintenance bimonthly for 2 years. Craniospinal irradiation consisted of CRT + 1400 rad in ten fractions to the spine. Randomization was stratified according to whether CNS leukemia occurred at initial diagnosis of acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) (Stratum I, 15 patients), during first bone marrow (BM) remission (Stratum II, 49 patients), simultaneous with first BM relapse (Stratum III, 12 patients), or during second BM remission (Stratum IV, 11 patients). The median follow-up for patients who remain at risk is 15 + months. Eight children (seven on CRT + ITC, one on CSpRT) developed presumed therapy related encephalopathy. In Stratum II, 16 of 29 (55%) patients receiving CRT + ITC experienced adverse events: 3 deaths during continuous complete remission (CCR) and 13 relapses (2 CNS, 1 CNS + BM, 1 BM + testes, and 2 testes) as compared with only 5 relapses in 20 (25%) patients on CSpRT (1 CNS, 1 CNS + BM, 1 BM, and 2 testes). The children on both regimens were comparable for sex, race, age at initial ALL diagnosis, time from ALL diagnosis to first episode of CNS leukemia, systemic therapy both before and after CNS relapse, and number of blasts in the spinal fluid at diagnosis of CNS leukemia. The conclusion is that children with isolated CNS leukemia can achieve prolonged survival with aggressive therapy, and that CSpRT is possibly less toxic and more likely than is CRT + ITC to prevent subsequent BM and testicular relapse (P less than 0.02), but not subsequent CNS relapse (P = 0.7). A possible systemic therapy effect of spinal irradiation is postulated to explain the superiority of CSpRT.     

Monthly pulses of vincristine and prednisone prevent bone marrow and testicular relapse in low-risk childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report of the CCG-161 study by the Childrens Cancer Study Group

On study CCG-161 of the Childrens Cancer Study Group (CCSG), 631 children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) at low risk for relapse were randomized to receive monthly pulses of vincristine-prednisone (VCR-PDN ) during maintenance therapy in addition to standard therapy with mercaptopurine (6MP) and methotrexate (MTX), and either cranial irradiation during consolidation or intrathecal (IT) MTX every 3 months during maintenance. All patients received six doses of IT MTX during induction and consolidation. With a minimum follow-up time of 4.25 years, 76.7% receiving VCR-PDN were in continuous complete remission at 5 years, in contrast to 63.9% receiving GMP-MTX alone (P = .002). The difference in relapse-free survival was due primarily to bone marrow relapse (P = .0008), and in boys also to testicular relapse (P = .003). Among the nonirradiated patients, the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 79.4% for patients randomized to the VCR-PDN pulses, in contrast to 61.2% for the patients randomized to receive 6MP-MTX alone (P = .0002). Among the irradiated patients, the DFS was not significantly different. Of the four combinations of maintenance and CNS therapy studied, the highest DFS was achieved with VCR-PDN pulses and maintenance IT MTX.     

Sequential combination of 5-fluorouracil, cis-platinum and irradiation in unresectable non-small cell lung cancer

Twenty patients with unresectable non-small cell lung carcinoma, 15 stage III and 5 stage IV (supraclavicular lymphadenopathy) were treated with a combination of three courses of chemotherapy and hypofractionated irradiation followed after 3 weeks by split-course radiotherapy. Each course was repeated every 3 weeks with the following sequence. Cis-platin (CDDP) (20 mg/m2) was given in a 20-min infusion, followed by a 2-h infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (400 mg/m2) on days 1, 2, 5 and 6. Radiation with a dose of 3 Gy on the target volume was given on days 3 and 4, after a 2-h infusion of 5-FU (400 mg/m2). Split course of irradiation consisted of 16 Gy in 5 fractions repeated after 3 weeks interval. The objective response rate was 75%. Median follow-up was 24 months, the median survival was 14 months. The 1-year survival was 53% and the 2-year survival was 16%.     

Combined-modality treatment of small-cell lung cancer: Randomized comparison of three induction chemotherapies followed by maintenance chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy to the chest

BACKGROUND: From 1980 to 1983 the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research(SAKK) performed a randomised phase HI trial in patients withsmall-cell lung cancer with the objective of improving the resultsof induction chemotherapy and defining the role of consolidatingchest irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were initially randomised to induction arms AVP (adriamycin,etoposide and cisplatin given every four weeks for four cycles),EVA (cyclophospha-mide, etoposide and adriamycin given everyfour weeks for four cycles) or MOC/AVP (methotrexate, vincristine,cyclo-phosphamide alternating with adriamycin, etoposide andcisplatin given for two cycles). All patients received prophylacticcranial irradiation with 30 Gy, and after four months of inductionchemotherapy were randomized to maintenance chemotherapy withor without consolidating chest irradiation. The patients inthe combined-modality maintenance arm first received radiationtherapy to the chest (45 Gy) followed by MOC/EVA chemotherapy. RESULTS: 266 patients were eligible and evaluable. An overall responserate of 70% with 21% of complete remissions, a median survivalof 9.3 months and survival of 8% of the patients at two yearswere observed. The highest objective response rate was achievedwith the AVP-induction chemotherapy with an 80% response rateand 32% complete remissions. Similar results were achieved withthe alternating regimen of MOC/AVP. In contrast, patients treatedwith the EVA induction regimen had significantly lower overallremission (56%) and complete remission rates (7%). The roleof consolidating chest irradiation could not be clarified inlimited-disease patients due to the small number of them whowere randomised to the maintenance part of the study. However,in patients with extensive disease in partial remission afterinduction treatment, combined maintenance therapy had a moresignificant adverse effect on survival than maintenance chemotherapyalone (median survival in the maintenance phase of 148 daysversus 239 days, p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: We conclude that the combination of adriamycin, etoposide andcisplatin is an active induction treatment. Consolidating chestirradiation is contraindicated in patients with extensive diseasein partial remission after induction when given in a sequentialmanner, as in our trial. small-cell lung cancer, chemotherapy, alternating chemotherapy, combined-modality treatment, radiotherapy     

Treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma by continuous intravenous infusion of recombinant interleukin-2: a single-center phase II study.

PURPOSE: A single-center phase II study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) administered by continuous infusion to patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients with RCC were entered onto the study. rIL-2 (Proleukin; Eurocetus Corp, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) was administered intravenously in a dose of 18 x 10(6) IU/m2 per 24 hours. A maximum of two induction cycles and four maintenance cycles were given. Each induction cycle consisted of two rIL-2 infusion periods of 120 hours and 108 hours duration, respectively; these were separated by a 6-day rest period. Each maintenance cycle consisted of a 120 hours rIL-2 infusion period. RESULTS: Six of 30 assessable patients (20%) responded; two (7%) with a complete response (CR) and four (13%) with a partial response (PR). The response duration for patients with CR was 209 and 715+ days, and for those with PR 161, 197, 245, and 353 days. Seven patients had stable disease (SD) with a median duration of 261 days (range, 127 to 381 days). The overall median survival was 261 days (range, 13 to 905+ days). The most frequent toxicities requiring dose reductions of rIL-2 were: hypotension in 87% of patients, dyspnea in 32%, CNS toxicity in 55%, and an increase in serum creatinine levels in 48%. Septicemia occurred in 16% of patients. Toxicities usually reversed on interruption of rIL-2 infusion. One patient (3%) died as a result of the treatment from initial CNS toxicity followed by multiorgan failure. CONCLUSIONS: The study confirmed the antitumor efficacy of rIL-2 administered by continuous infusion in patients with metastatic RCC. The response rate was similar to that obtained by high-dose bolus injections of rIL-2. Toxicity was substantial but manageable in a specialized oncology ward without routine use of an intensive care unit.