Different muscarinic receptor subtypes mediating the phasic activity and basal tone of pig isolated intravesical ureter.

1. We have studied the effects of muscarinic cholinoceptor agonists and specific antagonists on both phasic activity and basal tone of the isolated intravesical ureter of the pig by means of isometric techniques in vitro. 2. Acetylcholine in the presence and absence of physostigmine increased both phasic activity and basal tone of ureteral strips in a concentration-dependent manner. Moreover carbachol, methacholine and oxotremorine-M increased both contractile parameters while bethanechol and McN-A-343 evoked only increases in tone without affecting the frequency of the phasic contractions. 3. The nicotinic receptor blocker, hexamethonium (10(-6)-10(-4) M), failed to modify the contractions evoked by a single dose of carbachol (10(-5) M), whilst the muscarinic antagonist, atropine inhibited both phasic and tonic responses. 4. The muscarinic M1 (pirenzepine), M2 (AF-DX 116 and methoctramine), M3 (4-DAMP, HHSiD and p-F-HHSiD), and putative M4 receptor (tropicamide) antagonists significantly reversed increases in both frequency of phasic activity and baseline tone induced by a submaximal dose of carbachol (10(-5) M). The pIC50 values for inhibition of the induced phasic activity were: atropine (10.16) > 4-DAMP (9.12) > HHSiD (8.22) = methoctramine (7.98) = p-F-HHSiD (7.88 > tropicamide (7.62) = pirenzepine (7.53) = AF-DX 116 (7.45) and for inhibition of basal tone were: atropine (10.73) > 4-DAMP (9.32) > HHSiD (8.65) = pirenzepine (8.43) = p-F-HHSiD (8.38) > methoctramine (7.79) > tropicamide (7.53) > AF-DX 116 (7.04).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Muscarinic receptor subtype mediating vasodilation feline middle cerebral artery exhibits M3 pharmacology

The nature of the muscarinic receptor subtype mediating the endothelium-dependent relaxation of the cat middle cerebral artery was investigated in vitro by recording the smooth muscle isometric tension of precontracted arterial segments. Relaxation induced by several agonists (acetylcholine (ACh), acetyl-beta-methylcholine, oxotremorine, carbachol and McN-A-343) was recorded. The ability of selective (pirenzepine, dicyclomine, adiphenine, AF-DX 116, methoctramine, gallamine, 4-diphenylacetoxy-N-methylpiperidine methiodide (4-DAMP) and hexahydro-sila-difenidol (HHSiD] and non-selective antagonists (atropine, scopolamine and quinuclidinyl benzilate (QNB] to block the relaxation induced by ACh was also estimated. The weak activity of the poorly selective M1 muscarinic receptor as together with the intermediate affinity of pirenzepine and adiphenine tend to exclude the M1 muscarinic receptor as the primary mediator of the cholinergic relaxation. The low affinity of AF-DX 116 and methoctramine further suggested that the cerebrovascular muscarinic receptor does not correspond to the M2 cardiac subtype. In contrast, 4-DAMP and HHSiD potently inhibited the ACh-induced relaxation with affinities similar to those reported at the M3 glandular receptor. We conclude that a similar to the pharmacological M3 muscarinic receptor subtype is responsible for the cholinergic relaxation of the cat middle cerebral artery.     

Muscarinic M2 receptors in bovine tracheal smooth muscle: discrepancies between binding and function

Previous work showing that AF-DX 116, a cardioselective muscarinic antagonist in functional experiments, does not discriminate between muscarinic receptors in bovine cardiac and tracheal membranes has been extended. In addition to AF-DX 116 we used the muscarinic antagonists, atropine, pirenzepine, 4-DAMP methobromide, gallamine, hexahydrosiladifenidol and methoctramine, in radioligand binding experiments on bovine cardiac left ventricular and tracheal smooth muscle membranes. The functional antagonism of the methacholine-induced contraction of bovine tracheal smooth muscle strips was also evaluated. An excellent correlation was found for all compounds between the binding affinities for muscarinic receptors in cardiac and tracheal smooth muscle membranes; moreover, the affinities found in cardiac membranes correspond with the pA2 values reported for atrial preparations of rat and guinea pig. However, significant and occasionally marked discrepancies were found between binding and functional affinities of these muscarinic antagonists on bovine tracheal smooth muscle.     

Presynaptic and postjunctional muscarinic receptors in dog ileum: binding studies

[3H]N-Methylscopolamine identified two distinct populations of muscarinic receptors in membranes derived from the longitudinal smooth muscle/myenteric plexus of dog ileum. In isolated axonal varicosities, the half-maximal saturation of binding sites occurred at 2.38 +/- 0.39 nM [3H]N-methylscopolamine, with maximal binding capacity 140 +/- 35 fmol/mg protein (mean +/- S.D., n = 8). In purified smooth muscle plasma membranes, the Kd value was 16 +/- 3 nM with Bmax 1960 +/- 494 fmol/mg. The displacement potencies of subtype-selective muscarinic antagonists in the fraction of axonal varicosities followed the order 4-diphenylacetoxy-N-methylpiperidine (4-DAMP) methiodide much greater than pirenzepine = methoctramine greater than AF-DX 116 with pKi values 7.38, 5.67, 5.70 and 5.13, respectively. Both 4-DAMP methiodide and pirenzepine were approximately 4-fold less potent in displacing the ligand from the receptors in smooth muscle plasma membranes as compared to varicose receptors. The potency ratios of cardioselective antagonists methoctramine and AF-DX 116 on varicose and smooth muscle receptors were 1 and 1.7. It is concluded that presynaptic receptors located on isolated axonal varicosities have pharmacological properties similar to glandular (M3) subtype of muscarinic receptors. The binding properties of receptors present in smooth muscle plasma membranes were found incompatible with those of any of the M1, M2 or M3 subtypes.     

Characterization of subtype of propylbenzilylcholine mustard (PrBCM)-sensitive and -resistant muscarinic cholinoceptors in guinea pig ileal muscle.

The subtype of propylbenzilylcholine mustard (PrBCM)-sensitive and -resistant muscarinic cholinoceptors in guinea pig ileal muscle was examined using four selective muscarinic antagonists, pirenzepine, AF-DX 116, himbacine and 4-DAMP. The pA2 values of the four antagonists against pilocarpine were not different from their values against carbachol after the treatment with PrBCM and was identified with the values for the m3 subtype. These results suggest that the subtype of PrBCM-sensitive and -resistant muscarinic cholinoceptors in guinea pig ileal muscle is the m3 subtype only and not other subtypes.     

Chimeric m2/m3 muscarinic receptors: role of carboxyl terminal receptor domains in selectivity of ligand binding and coupling to phosphoinositide hydrolysis

The cloning and expression of five mammalian muscarinic receptor genes (m1-m5) have shown that the individual receptor subtypes differ in their functional and ligand-binding properties. To study the role of the carboxyl terminal receptor domains in this pharmacological diversity, we constructed chimeric m2/m3 receptors in which a region comprising part of transmembrane domain VI, the third extracellular loop, transmembrane region VII, and the cytoplasmic tail (collectively referred to as C-terminal domains) was exchanged between the human m2 and the rat m3 receptor. The ability of the cloned receptors to mediate stimulation of phosphoinositide hydrolysis and to bind subtype-selective muscarinic ligands was studied after their transient expression in COS-7 cells. Whereas wild-type m3 strongly stimulated phosphoinositide breakdown, wild-type m2 gave only a poor response. Exchange of the C-terminal domains between m2 and m3 had no significant effect on the magnitude of these responses. In N-[3H]methylscopolamine competition binding studies, the muscarinic antagonists AF-DX 116 and methoctramine showed 11- and 23-fold higher affinities, respectively, for m2 than for m3, whereas hexahydro-silad-ifenidol (HHSiD) and 4-diphenylacetoxy-N-methylpiperidine methiodide (4-DAMP) displayed the reverse selectivity profile, having approximately 10-fold higher affinities for m3. In comparison with wild-type m3, the mutant m3 receptor containing the C-terminal domains of m2 displayed 2.5- and 8-fold higher affinities for AF-DX 116 and methoctramine but 7- and 3-fold lower affinities for HHSiD and 4-DAMP, respectively. The mutant m2 receptor with the C-terminal domains of m3 showed 2-3-fold lower affinities for AF-DX 116 and methoctramine but 2-3-fold higher affinities for HHSiD and 4-DAMP, as compared with wild-type m2. These data suggest that the C-terminal domains of the muscarinic receptors are not involved in conferring selectivity of coupling to phosphoinositide hydrolysis but contain major structural determinants of antagonist binding selectivity.     

M3-muscarinic receptor mediates prejunctional inhibition of noradrenaline release and the relaxation in cat femoral artery.

The aim of the present study was to analyse the muscarinic receptors involved in the vasodilation elicited by acetylcholine (ACh) and the carbachol inhibition of electrically-evoked [3H]noradrenaline (NA) release in cat femoral artery. For this purpose, the following receptor antagonists were used, atropine, pirenzepine (M1-antagonist), AF-DX 116 (M2-antagonist) and 4-diphenylacetoxy-N-methylpiperidine methobromide (4-DAMP; M3-antagonist). The order of potency (pA2 values) of these drugs at postjunctional level was: atropine (9.7) greater than or equal to 4-DAMP (9.6) greater than pirenzepine (7.2) greater than AF-DX 116 (6.0), and at prejunctional level (pIC50 values) was: 4-DAMP (9.3) greater than atropine (8.5) greater than AF-DX 116 (7.1) greater than pirenzepine (5.9). These findings indicate that the muscarinic receptors mediating the vasodilation induced by ACh and the carbachol inhibition of NA release are of the M3-subtype.     

Characterization of muscarinic receptors of bovine coronary artery by functional and radioligand binding studies

The nature of the muscarinic receptor subtype mediating contraction of the endothelium-denuded bovine coronary artery was investigated in vitro by functional measurements and radioligand binding studies. The acetylcholine (ACh)-induced isotonic contraction of circularly cut muscle strips was recorded and expressed as a percentage of the maximum contraction obtained with 80 mM K+. In order to distinguish between M1, M2 and M3 receptors, the potency of the five subtype-selective antagonists, 4-diphenylacetoxy-N-methyl-piperidine methobromide (4-DAMP), parafluor-hexahydro-siladifenidol (pFHHSiD), pirenzepine, AF-DX 116 and methoctramine, to block the ACh-induced contraction was estimated. All the antagonists competitively inhibited the responses induced by ACh, with one exception, namely, 4-DAMP, whose Schild plot had a slope greater than one. The low affinity of pirenzepine (pA2 7.14 +/- 0.14) excluded an action at the M1 subtype. The low affinity of AF-DX 116 (pA2 6.49 +/- 0.18) and methoctramine (pA2 5.88 +/- 0.07) suggest that the bovine coronary artery smooth muscle receptor is not of the M2 (cardiac) subtype. In contrast, 4-DAMP (pA2 9.04 +/- 0.03) and pFHHSiD (pA2 7.64 +/- 0.04) potently inhibited the ACh-induced contraction with affinities similar to those reported for the M3 (glandular) receptor. In addition, the muscarinic receptors mediating coronary artery contraction were characterized in antagonist/[3H]N-methyl-scopolamine ([3H]NMS) competition binding studies. With the exception of AF-DX 116, all antagonists bound to a homogeneous population of receptors with pseudo-Hill slopes not different from unity. The pKi values, albeit somewhat lower, essentially substantiated the functional affinity estimates.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparison of the muscarinic receptors in the coronary artery,cerebral artery and atrium of the pig

Summary The affinity of various muscarinic antagonists for the muscarinic receptors mediating contraction (induced by acetyl-\-methylcholine) of the isolated pig coronary and basilar artery was determined in order to compare the muscarinic receptor subtype involved in the contractile response of these arteries. In order to identify the muscarinic receptor subtype(s) involved, the affinity of the antagonists for the M₂ receptor present in the pig atria was also investigated. The following muscarinic antagonists were used: atropine, pirenzepine, AF-DX 116 (11-2{{2-{(diethyl-amino)methyl} -1- piperidinyl}acetyl} - 5, 11- dihydro - 6H - pyrido {2, 3 - b} {, 4}benzodiazepin - 6 - one), 4-DAMP (4-diphenylacetoxy-N-methylpiperidine methiodide), HHSiD (hexahydrosiladifenidol), methoctramine (N, N- bis{6 - {(2 - methoxybenzyl)amino} hexyl} -1, 8 - octane - diamine tetrahydrochloride) and ipratropium.The order of affinity of the antagonists with respect to the muscarinic receptor in the coronary artery was clearly different from that for the muscarinic receptor in the basilar artery. The order of affinity established on the basilar artery closely resembled that for the M2 receptor in the atria.It is concluded that the muscarinic receptors on smooth muscle of the coronary and basilar arteries are not identical. The muscarinic receptor involved in the contraction of the basilar artery adheres to the M2 receptor subtype. A comparison of the selectivity of the antagonists suggests that the muscarinic receptor involved in the contraction of the coronary artery belongs to the M₃ (like in exocrine glands) or M₄ (as found in ileal smooth muscle) receptor subtype.     

Muscarinic cholinoceptor subtypes mediating tracheal smooth muscle contraction and inositol phosphate generation in guinea pig and rat.

The effects of the muscarinic cholinoceptor antagonists atropine (non-selective), pirenzepine (M1-selective), methoctramine (M2-selective) and 4-diphenylacetoxy-N-methylpiperidine methiodide (4-DAMP; M3-selective) were examined on the responsiveness of guinea pig and rat tracheal tissue to acetylcholine and carbachol. Results indicate that smooth muscle contraction in isolated tracheal tissue from both species was mediated primarily by muscarinic M3 cholinoceptors. The effects of atropine, pirenzepine and 4-DAMP were similar against the contractile actions of acetylcholine and carbachol in both species and in epithelium-intact and epithelium-denuded tissue. In contrast, differences in the effects of methoctramine in antagonising contractile responses to acetylcholine and carbachol were observed between the two species and following epithelium removal in the guinea pig. Thus, whilst this study has found that tracheal smooth muscle contraction in the guinea pig and rat is mediated primarily by muscarinic M3 cholinoceptors, anomalies in the functional inositol phosphate generation results obtained with the muscarinic cholinoceptor antagonists highlight species differences in the actions of acetylcholine and carbachol in eliciting smooth muscle contraction suggesting the possible existence of functional non-M3 muscarinic cholinoceptors.     

M3 muscarinic receptors but not M2 mediate contraction of the porcine detrusor muscle in vitro

1. The objective of the study was to determine the role of muscarinic receptor subtypes in mediating contraction of the porcine detrusor smooth muscle in vitro. 2. Strips of pig detrusor muscle were set up in physiological salt solution and the tensions developed by the tissues were recorded. Responses to carbachol were obtained in the absence and presence of a range of muscarinic antagonists (4-DAMP, methoctramine, darifenacin, oxybutynin, tolterodine and pirenzepine). Antagonist affinity values (pKB values) were calculated and compared with those quoted in the literature for these antagonists at each of the muscarinic receptor subtypes. 3. The M3-selective antagonists, 4-DAMP and darifenacin had high affinities (pKB values of 9.4 and 8.6, respectively). Oxybutynin, tolterodine and pirenzepine had affinities of 8.2, 8.1 and 6.8, respectively, whilst the M2-selective agent methoctramine had a relatively low affinity (pKB = 6.1). The rank order of affinities was, therefore, 4-DAMP > darifenacin > oxybutynin > tolterodine > pirenzepine > methoctramine for the pig detrusor. Correlation of the antagonist affinities obtained on the bladder with those published for these antagonists at the five muscarinic receptor subtypes identified the M3(m3)-receptor as the muscarinic subtype mediating detrusor contractile responses in vitro. 4. These data suggest that a small population of M3-muscarinic receptors must mediate direct contractile responses of the pig detrusor muscle to muscarinic receptor stimulation in vitro.     

Characterization of muscarinic receptors mediating contractions of circular and longitudinal muscle of human isolated colon.

1. The effects of seven muscarinic receptor antagonists were used to characterize the receptors which mediate carbachol-evoked contractions of intertaenial circular and taenial longitudinal muscle in human isolated colon. The effects of these antagonists were studied upon colon contractions induced by cumulatively added carbachol which had mean EC50 values of 11.7 +/- 2.3 microM (n = 8) and 12.6 +/- 2.3 microM (n = 8) respectively upon circular and longitudinal smooth muscle. 2. All antagonists displaced concentration-response curves to carbachol to the right in a parallel manner. The maximum concentration of each antagonist added (30 nM-10 microM) did not significantly suppress the maximum response. 3. In circular muscle, the M3 muscarinic receptor antagonists, 4-diphenylacetoxy-N-methylpiperidine methiodide (4-DAMP), hexahydrosiladiphenidol (HHSiD) and para-fluoro-hexahydrosiladiphenidol (p-F-HHSiD) inhibited responses with pA2 values of 9.41 +/- 0.23, 7.17 +/- 0.07, 6.94 +/- 0.18 respectively. The M2 muscarinic receptor antagonist, AF-DX 116, the M2/M4 muscarinic receptor antagonist, himbacine, and the M1 muscarinic receptor antagonist, pirenzepine, yielded pA2 values of 7.36 +/- 0.43, 7.47 +/- 0.14 and 7.23 +/- 0.48 respectively. The non-selective antagonist, atropine, had a pA2 of 8.72 +/- 0.28. 4. In longitudinal muscle 4-DAMP, HHSiD, p-F-HHSiD, AF-DX 116, himbacine and pirenzepine gave pA2 values of 9.09 +/- 0.16, 7.45 +/- 0.43, 7.44 +/- 0.21, 6.44 +/- 0.1, 7.54 +/- 0.40, 6.87 +/- 0.38 respectively. Atropine yielded a pA2 value of 8.60 +/- 0.08.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Direct binding studies on ileal and cardiac muscarinic receptors

1 Functional studies have indicated that muscarinic receptors in cardiac tissue differ from those in the ileum. In the present study ileal and cardiac muscarinic receptors identified by [3H]-N-methyl scopolamine ([3H]-NMS) were characterized and the selectivity of currently available ileal and atrial selective antagonists determined. 2 In terms of the current functional classification of muscarinic receptors both ileal and cardiac muscarinic receptors were of the M2 subtype based upon their low affinity for pirenzepine. 3 Cyclohexylphenyl(2-piperidinoethyl)silanol (CPPS), a highly ileal selective antagonist in functional studies, was unable to distinguish between ileal and atrial muscarinic receptors identified in binding studies. Furthermore, although AF-DX 116 and dicyclomine were able to differentiate atrial and ileal muscarinic receptors, neither compound was more than 2 fold selective. These data indicate that it is not possible to subclassify ileal and atrial muscarinic receptors using direct ligand binding studies with these antagonists. 4 In circular ileal smooth muscle, apparent heterogeneity of the M2 muscarinic receptor population was observed. Thus AF-DX 116 identified two populations of sites with affinities differing by 30 fold. These two populations of M2 muscarinic receptors may represent the typical M2 muscarinic receptors identified in cardiac tissue and the more recently discovered 'gland type' M2 muscarinic receptors. 5 The circular ileal smooth muscle tissue homogenate was able to decrease dramatically the apparent affinity of adiphenine. This activity, which appeared to result from a phenylmethylsulphonylfluoride (PMSF) sensitive protease effect, should be considered when conducting studies using this tissue preparation and compounds of similar structure to adiphenine.     

M2 muscarinic receptors on the iris sphincter muscle differ from those on iris noradrenergic nerves

The pre- and postjunctional affinity constants of a series of muscarinic antagonists were determined in guinea pig and rabbit irises. Field stimulation-evoked [3H]noradrenaline release from superfused isolated irises was concentration dependently inhibited by (+/-)-methacholine, confirming the presence on the iris noradrenergic nerves of prejunctional inhibitory muscarinic receptors. The affinity constants of the antagonists at the pre- and postjunctional receptors are compatible with the coexistence in the iris of two different M2 receptors: the cardiac (M2 alpha) subtype on the noradrenergic nerves and the smooth muscle (M2 beta) subtype on the iris sphincter muscle. The rank order of potency of the antagonists studied at the prejunctional site was: atropine greater than himbacine greater than AF-DX 116 greater than pirenzepine greater than hexahydrosiladifenidol. The order of potency at the postjunctional receptors mediating the methacholine-induced isotonic contraction of the isolated rabbit iris sphincter was: atropine greater than hexahydrosiladifenidol greater than pirenzepine greater than himbacine greater than AF-DX 116.     

Interaction of selective compounds with muscarinic receptors at dispersed intestinal smooth muscle cells.

1. The characterization of muscarinic receptors on single cells of the guinea-pig ileum longitudinal smooth muscle, devoid of neuronal elements, was functionally studied by estimating the affinities of muscarinic antagonists on acetylcholine-induced contractions. 2. Atropine (5 x 10(-11) to 5 x 10(-6) M), 4-diphenylacetoxy-N-methyl-piperidine methiodide (4-DAMP, 5 x 10(-8) to 5 x 10(-6) M), cyclohexyl(4-fluoro-phenyl) (3-piperidinopropyl) silanol (pFHHSiD, 5 x 10(-7) to 5 x 10(-5) M) as well as pirenzepine (5 x 10(-7) to 5 x 10(-5) M) competitively antagonized the acetylcholine-dependent contractions with different affinities (atropine > 4-DAMP > pFHHSiD > pirenzepine). 3. Methoctramine (5 x 10(-7) to 5 x 10(-5) M), and AF-DX 116 (5 x 10(-6) and 5 x 10(-5) M) also showed antagonist properties but these deviated from simple competition. These compounds, which discriminate between M2 and M3 receptors, showed a potency lower than that of pirenzepine, the rank order of potencies being pirenzepine > methoctramine > AF-DX 116. When concentrations of AF-DX 116, methoctramine and pirenzepine were increased an unspecific contractile effect occurred. 4. McN-A-343, a partial agonist on intact guinea-pig longitudinal smooth muscle strips, on this preparation induced a weak contraction (about 7% in comparison to control) that was not reversed by antimuscarinic agents. 5. These data indicate that M3 rather than M2 receptor sites are present on this tissue.     

Analysis of muscarinic cholinoceptors mediating phosphoinositide hydrolysis in guinea pig cardiac muscle.

The muscarinic receptor mediating stimulation of PI hydrolysis in guinea pig atria and ventricles has been studied. The non-selective muscarinic agonist (+)-cis-dioxolane elicited this response, concentration-dependently, with a potency indicative of a low receptor reserve. The potency of a novel, M2-selective agonist, L-660,863 (-log EC50 = 6.3, atria; 6.0, ventricles) was observed to be lower than its apparent affinity (-log KA = 7.6) for M2 receptors, indicating an action probably mediated by a population distinct from that producing negative inotropy in the same tissue. The inhibition of the response to (+)-cis-dioxolane by several muscarinic antagonists (atropine, pirenzepine, AF-DX 116, methoctramine, HHSiD and pFHHSiD) generated an affinity profile for this receptor also dissimilar to that described for the receptor mediating the classical cardiac 'M2' response. Although no other muscarinic receptor mRNA has been detected in this tissue, these data suggest the presence of a second population of muscarinic sites, which may signify an M2 receptor diversity.     

Subclassification of atrial and intestinal muscarinic receptors of the rat--direct binding studies with agonists and antagonists

1. Although extensively investigated, the extent of differences between receptors mediating negative inotropic and chronotropic responses is still unclear. In the present study atrial and intestinal muscarinic receptors were identified by [3H]-N-methyl-scopolamine ([3H]-NMS) binding and the affinities of some presumably inotropy- or chronotropy-selective agonists and several antagonists determined. 2. All the agonists tested showed similar affinity for right and left atrial receptors. Accepting an affinity difference of 0.4 log units as experimental error, none of the agonists tested was selective for either atrium. 3. Affinity differences of the cardioselective antagonists himbacine, AF-DX 116 and methoctramine and the M1-selective antagonist dicyclomine for right and left atrial muscarinic receptors were also minimal (less than 2 fold selective). When compared to intestinal receptors, AF-DX 116 was 3 to 4 fold, methoctramine 10 to 13 fold selective and himbacine and dicyclomine non-selective. 4. These data provide evidence for differences between atrial and intestinal but not between right and left atrial muscarinic receptors.     

Characterization of muscarinic receptors mediating relaxation and contraction in the rat iris dilator muscle.

1. The characteristics of muscarinic receptors mediating relaxation and/or contraction in the rat iris dilator muscle were examined. 2. Relaxation was induced in a dilator muscle by application of acetylcholine (ACh) at low doses (3 microM or less) and contraction was induced by high doses. Methacholine and carbachol also showed biphasic effects similar to those of ACh; in contrast, bethanechol, arecoline, pilocarpine and McN-A-343 induced mainly relaxation but no substantial contraction. 3. After parasympathetic denervation by ciliary ganglionectomy, the relaxant response to muscarinic agonists disappeared upon nerve stimulation. Application of McN-A-343 and pilocarpine induced only small contractions in denervated dilator muscles, indicating that these are partial agonists for contraction. 4. pA2 values of pirenzepine, methoctramine, AF-DX 116, himbacine, and 4-DAMP for antagonism to pilocarpine-induced relaxation in normal dilator muscles and those for antagonism to ACh-induced contraction in denervated dilator muscles were determined. The pA2 values for antagonism to relaxation of all these antagonists were most similar to those for M3-type muscarinic receptors. 5. Although pA2 values for contraction of these antagonists, except for methoctramine, were very close to those for relaxation, contraction was not significantly antagonized by methoctramine. Contraction might be mediated by M3-like receptors which have a very low affinity for methoctramine. 6. In conclusion, ACh-induced biphasic responses in rat iris dilator muscles were clearly distinguished from each other by specific muscarinic agonists and parasympathetic denervation, whereas muscarinic receptors could not be subclassified according to the pA2 values of 5 specific antagonists only.     

A pharmacological study of the responses induced by muscarinic agonists on the isolated superior cervical ganglion of the guinea-pig

We have studied the muscarinic agonist induced responses on the guinea-pig superior cervical ganglion in vitro, as recorded from the internal carotid nerve using a grease-gap. The principal response was a depolarization, but a small hyperpolarizing response could be revealed under certain conditions. We determined the pA2 of a number of muscarinic antagonists against the muscarine induced depolarization. Four selective antagonists and atropine appeared to act competitively. The rank order of their pA2s was 4-DAMP (8.5), atropine (8.4), pirenzepine (8.0), methoctramine (7.2) and AF-DX 116 (6.3). In addition to muscarine, we assessed the potency and relative maximum response of nine other muscarinic compounds to depolarize this preparation: carbachol, 5-methylfurmethide, oxotremorine, oxotremorine-M, pilocarpine, RS 86, AF102B and two novel compounds L-670548 and L-679512. L-670548 was the most potent and AF102B was the least potent agonist tested. Only AF102B evoked a maximum depolarization that was significantly smaller than muscarine. A hyperpolarizing response to carbachol (1 microM) could be recorded when the superfusing medium contained 0.3 microM pirenzepine and only 0.1 mM CaCl2 (cf. usual 2.5 mM). This response was relatively small compared to that evoked on the superior cervical ganglion of the rat. It was blocked by the cardioselective antagonists methoctramine (0.1-0.3 microM) and AF-DX 116 (0.3-1.0 microM). Of the 10 agonists tested, only carbachol, oxotremorine and oxotremorine-M reproducibly evoked a hyperpolarizing response. It was concluded that muscarinic agonists can induce a depolarization of the guinea-pig superior cervical ganglion mediated by M1 receptors. The activation of cardiac-like M2 receptors resulted in a hyperpolarizing response that was relatively small.