异长春花碱单药化疗75岁以上高龄晚期非小细胞肺癌

目的 评价异长春花碱单药化疗对高龄晚期非小细胞肺癌患者生活质量的影响及其耐受性。方法 治疗75岁以上高龄晚期非小细胞肺癌38例。治疗组20例予以异长春花碱(NVB)25mg／m^2第l，8天，28天为一疗程；对照组18例辅以最佳的支持治疗(BSC)。结果 治疗组有效率20％，对照组有效率0。结论 对高龄晚期非小细胞肺癌患者，异长春花碱单药化疗较支持治疗有更好的疗效和生活质量，更长的生存期，且毒副作用轻微，可以耐受。     

异长春花碱单药化疗高龄晚期非小细胞肺癌

目的：评价高龄NSCLC患者用异长春花碱单药化疗的生存率,生活质量及能否耐受。方法：治疗高龄晚期非小细胞肺癌40例,治疗组20例予以持续深静脉输注异长春花碱（NVB）24小时7．5mg/m^2第1－5天,同时第一天快速静滴异长春花碱7．5mg/m^2,三周后重复;对照组20例运用中药薏芯仁提取物200ml/天静滴20天1疗程辅以其他支持治疗,每1月为1疗程,所有病例至少完成两个疗程,除非治疗中发现病情进展,结果：治疗组有效率35％（7／20）,患者中位生存期 7．2个月,一年生存率25％,对照组有效率10％（2／20）,患者中位生存期4．8个月,一年生存率5％,结论：对高龄晚期非小细胞癌患者,异长春花碱单药治疗较中药薏芯仁为主的支持治疗有更好的疗效,生活质量,更长的生存期,且毒副反应轻微,可以耐受。     

热、化疗联合治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效观察

目的：观察异长春花碱（NVB），顺铂（DDP）静脉化疗与热疗联合治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效。方法：44例晚期非小细胞肺癌患者随机分为两组，单纯化疗组（22例）仅予常规NP方案化疗，28天为一周期，完成2周期，热化疗组22例使用NP方案化疗联合射频热疗，每周热疗2次，共12次。结果：热化疗组PR9例，有效率41％，单纯化疗组PR6例，有效率27％，两组生活质量改善情况差异有显著性（P〈0．05），毒副反应相似，主要毒性为骨髓抑制以及胃肠道反应。结论：NP方案联合热疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌方便、安全，近期疗效较好。     

热、化疗联合治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效观察

目的:观察异长春花碱(NVB),顺铂(DDP)静脉化疗与热疗联合治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效。方法:44例晚期非小细胞肺癌患者随机分为两组,单纯化疗组(22例)仅予常规NP方案化疗,28天为一周期,完成2周期,热化疗组22例使用NP方案化疗联合射频热疗,每周热疗2次,共12次。结果:热化疗组PR9例,有效率41%,单纯化疗组PR6例,有效率27%,两组生活质量改善情况差异有显著性(P<0.05),毒副反应相似,主要毒性为骨髓抑制以及胃肠道反应。结论:NP方案联合热疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌方便、安全,近期疗效较好。     

异长春花碱加顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌33例疗效观察

目的　观察国产异长春花碱(盖诺)加顺铂联合化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的近期疗效及毒副作用。方法　3 3例Ⅲb～Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌,采用国产异长春花碱2 5mg/m2 ,iv ,d1,d8,顺铂2 0mg/m2 ,ivgtt ,d1～4,联合化疗。结果　腺癌2 1例中CR +PR 11例,有效率5 2 4% ;鳞癌12例中CR +PR 5例,有效率41 2 % ;总有效率48 5 %。主要不良反应为骨髓抑制及静脉炎,若用深静脉给药可减轻静脉炎的发生。结论　异长春花碱加顺铂联合化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌疗效较好,不良反应可耐受,值得临床推广应用。     

异长春花碱持续静脉输注治疗晚期非小细胞癌的临床观察

目的 :观察异长春花碱静脉持续输注联合顺铂治疗非细胞肺癌的临床疗效及其毒副反应。方法 :42例晚期非小细胞肺癌患者随机分为治疗组 19例和对照组 2 3例。结果 :治疗组采用异长春花碱持续静脉输注给药 ,有效率为 47 3%;对照组采用异长春花碱常规静注给药 ,有效率为 43 5 %,二组比较无显著性差异 (P >0 0 5 )。两组主要毒性反应为骨髓抑制 ,白细胞减少发生率分别为 5 2 6 %和 86 9%,二组比较有显著性差异 (P <0 0 5 )。结论 :异长春花碱持续静脉输注联合顺铂与常规治疗方法相比有效率稍有提高 ,血液学毒性明显减低 ,采用锁骨下静脉置管避免了静脉炎的发生 ,降低了总的治疗费用 ,值得临床推广应用。     

异长春花碱联合顺铂治疗27例晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察

目的：探讨异长春花碱加顺铂联合化疗方案对晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效和毒性反应。方法：27例晚期非小细胞肺癌患者应用联合方案化疗，异长春花碱25mg/m2，第1、8天；顺铂30mg/m2，第1～3天，结果：Ⅲ期和Ⅳ期病人有效率分别为53.3％和50.0％，总有效率51.9％，初治病人有效率为66.7％，复治病人有效率只有33.3％。主要不良反应为骨髓抑制，Ⅲ-Ⅳ度白细胞减少占25.9％。结论：异长春花碱加顺铂对晚期非小细胞肺癌有较好疗效，不良反应可以耐受。     

以异长春花碱为主联合化疗方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的近期疗效

目的 通过应用以异长春花碱为主联合化疗方案以提高晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效。方法 采用以异长春花碱为主方案化疗。结果 总有效率50％,比报道的常用化疗方案治疗非小细胞肺癌的疗效高。结论 异长春花碱为主联合化疗方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺痛能提高疗效。     

NIP方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌

目的 :为了解、评估异长春花碱 (NVB)、异环磷酰胺 (IFO) ,顺铂 (DDP)联合化疗对晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效及毒副作用。方法 :用NIP方案治疗 4 0例晚期非小细胞肺癌患者。DDP 6 0mg/m2 dl,NVB 2 5mg/m2 dl,8,IFO 1.2g/m2 dl 5。 2 3周期后评价疗效及毒副反应。结果 :完全缓解 (CR) 4例 ,部分缓解 (PR) 18例 ,稳定 (NC) 14例 ,进展 (PD) 4例。总有效率 5 5 %。毒性反应主要为骨髓抑制、消化道反应、脱发和注射局部静脉炎。结论 :异长春花碱、异环磷酰胺和顺铂联合化疗方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌有效率高 ,毒副反应可以耐受 ,可作为治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的一线方案     

NP方案与热疗联合治疗非小细胞肺癌的疗效观察

目的观察异长春花碱(NVB)、顺铂(DDP)静脉化疗与热疗联合治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效.方法 40例晚期非小细胞肺癌患者随机分为两组,观察组(20例)应用NVB 25 mg/m2,d1,8;DDP 75 mg/m2,d1,静脉化疗联合射频热疗.对照组(20例)仅予常规NP方案化疗.28 d为一周期,至少完成2周期.结果观察组PR 9例,有效率为45.0%;对照组PR 7例,有效率35.0%.两组生活质量改善情况差异有显著性(P<0.05).两组毒副反应相似,主要毒性为骨髓抑制以及胃肠道反应.结论 NP方案联合热疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌是合理、方便、安全、有效的一种可行性方案,可以作为一线方案在临床推广.     

长春瑞滨软胶囊单药节拍化疗一线治疗老年非小细胞肺癌临床疗效观察

目的 探讨口服长春瑞滨软胶囊单药节拍化疗在老年非小细胞肺癌患者中的临床疗效及生存时间分析。方法 选择56例年龄≥75岁初治老年非小细胞肺癌患者,给以口服长春瑞滨软胶囊50 mg每次,每周3次单药节拍化疗,观察临床疗效、不良反应及总生存期和无进展生存期。结果 全部患者疗效评价CR 1例（1.8%）,PR 9例（16.1%）,ORR为17.9%;SD 22例（39.3%）,并且稳定时间人均达12周以上,DCR达57.2%;中位无进展生存期5月（3~22月）,中位总生存期9月（4~31月）,1年生存率为35.7%（20/56）,2年生存率为16.1%（9/56）,3~4级不良反应出现较少。结论 应用长春瑞滨软胶囊单药节拍化疗安全可靠,可有效改善生活质量,为老年非小细胞肺癌患者临床综合治疗决策提供了新的思路。     

Gemcitabine,cisplatin and vinorelbine as induction chemotherapy followed by radical therapy in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicentre study of galician-lung-cancer-group

PURPOSE: To determine the effectiveness of a gemcitabine-cisplatin-vinorelbine combination in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n=46) with stage III NSCLC and naive of therapy were recruited into the trial to receive gemcitabine (G, 1000 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8, cisplatin (C, 100 mg/m(2)) on day 1 and vinorelbine (V, 25 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8 every 21 days for three cycles. RESULTS: Two patients achieved complete response (CR) and 23 partial response (PR), overall response 52%. Subsequent radical surgery included nine patients of whom four were non-resectable and five were resected and with 1 CR. Radiotherapy was administered to 31 patients, and two achieved CR. The median time to progression and overall survival were 37 and 50 weeks, respectively. Grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 35% of cycles, with two toxic deaths. Severe non-haematological toxicity was uncommon. CONCLUSIONS: This GCV combination is effective in patients with stage III NSCLC, and with an acceptable toxicity.     

替吉奥胶囊治疗三线及以上晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察

目的 观察替吉奥胶囊单药治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌（NSCLC）的临床疗效及不良反应。方法 60例经病理组织学确诊的二线或二线以上治疗失败的NSCLC,其中30例患者（A组）据体表面积口服替吉奥胶囊（80～120mg／d,分2次口服,d1～d14, 21天为1周期）,并给予最佳支持治疗,2周期后评价近期疗效和不良反应;其余30例患者（B组）仅接受最佳支持治疗。结果 A组无CR、PR病例,SD 18例,PD 12例,疾病控制率（CR+PR+SD） 为60.0％（18／30）。主要不良反应为轻微的消化道反应及骨髓抑制。A组和B组的中位无进展生存期（PFS）分别为2.5个月和2.0个月,中位总生存期（OS）分别为5.0个月和3.0个月, 两组差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论 替吉奥胶囊单药治疗三线及以上晚期NSCLC有一定的疗效,不良反应可以耐受,安全性良好。     

Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine versus vinorelbine alone in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the addition of gemcitabine (G) to vinorelbine (V) improves survival and quality of life (QoL) among elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with NSCLC aged >/= 70 years with advanced disease were randomly allocated to receive V 30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks or G 1,200 mg/m(2) + V 30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. The estimated sample size was 120 patients per arm, but an interim analysis of survival was planned based on the first 60 patients per arm. RESULTS: In May 1999, the survival data were analyzed of 120 eligible patients (V group = 60; G + V group = 60) who had been randomized from June 1997 to February 1999. Forty-nine patients had stage IIIB disease, and 71 had stage IV. At a median potential follow-up of 14 months (range, 3 to 22 months), 93 patients had died (G + V group = 41; V group = 52). In the G + V group, median survival time was 29 weeks and projected 1-year survival was 30%; these values were 18 weeks and 13% in the V group. According to multivariate Cox analysis, the risk of death in the G + V arm compared with the V arm was 0.48 (95% confidence interval, 0. 29 to 0.79; P <.01). Combination therapy was also associated with a clear delay in symptom and QoL deterioration. The overall response rates were 22% and 15% in the G + V and V groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: In elderly patients with NSCLC, G + V treatment is associated with significantly better survival than is V alone.     

长春瑞滨单药治疗老年晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床研究

目的观察和评价长春瑞滨(NVB)单药治疗老年晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床疗效和毒性反应。方法21例晚期非小细胞肺癌患者均经病理组织学和(或)细胞学检查确诊。国产长春瑞滨(盖诺)25 mg/m2加NS100 ml快速静脉点滴,第1、8天。21 d为一个周期,至少治疗2个周期。结果21例患者均可评价,CR 1例,PR 5例,SD 6例,患者的近期有效率28.6%,TTP 5.1个月,中位生存期7.2个月,1年生存率30.1%。最主要的毒副反应为白细胞及血小板的降低,但均可以耐受。结论长春瑞滨(NVB)单药治疗老年晚期非小细胞肺癌有较好的临床疗效,可改善患者的生存质量,延长生存时间,毒性反应比较轻,老年患者亦可以耐受。     

紫杉醇联合顺铂及长春瑞滨联合卡铂治疗老年晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床对照研究

为了探讨紫杉醇联合顺铂及长春瑞滨联合卡铂方案对老年晚期非小细胞肺癌(non-smallcelllungcancer,NSCLC)的疗效和毒副反应,选取初治晚期NSCLC65例,分别应用TP(紫杉醇 顺铂)、NE(长春瑞滨 卡铂)方案治疗。每例均完成2个周期化疗后评价疗效及毒副反应。结果两组患者近期有效率TP组为41·9%(13/31),NE组为41·2%(14/34),差异无统计学意义,P>0·05。中位生存期TP组8·1个月,NE组7·2个月,差异无统计学意义,P>0·05。两组毒副反应均以骨髓抑制、脱发及恶心呕吐为主,TP组恶心呕吐发生率为87·1%,NE组为73·5%,白细胞减少TP组为74·9%,NE组为85·3%。两组病例均无化疗相关死亡发生。初步研究结果提示,TP、NE联合方案是治疗老年晚期NSCLC有效且耐受性较好的方案。     

Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The aim of this study was to determine the clinical activity and toxicity of a novel chemotherapy regimen of weekly gemcitabine and vinorelbine in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). 40 chemotherapy-naı̈ve patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were included. The doses of gemcitabine and vinorelbine were 1000 and 25 mg/m², respectively, given on days 1, 8 and 15, every 28 days. 38 patients were evaluable for response. One patient achieved a complete response (CR) and 10 attained a partial response (PR), for an overall response rate (ORR) of 29% (95% confidence interval (CI): 15–43%). 47% of patients experienced a clinical benefit. The main toxicity consisted of grade 3 anaemia and neutropenia in 5% of patients. Non-haematological toxicity was minimal. The dose-intensities were 744 mg/m²/week for gemcitabine and 15 mg/m²/week for vinorelbine. 40% of the patients survived for longer than 1 year. The median time to progression was 4 months and the median survival 8.5 months (95% CI: 3.1–13.8 months). The weekly administration of gemcitabine and vinorelbine is very well tolerated and results in an acceptable response rate for the treatment of NSCLC.     

Treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in the elderly: results of an international expert panel.

The best treatment for elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still debated. To guide clinical management of these patients and suggest the priorities for clinical research in this field, an International Expert Panel met in Naples, Italy, on April 19 to 20, 2004. Results and conclusions based on a review of evidence available in the literature to date are presented in this article. A comprehensive geriatric assessment is recommended to better define prognosis and to predict tolerance to treatment. In the first randomized study dedicated to elderly NSCLC patients, single-agent vinorelbine showed superiority over supportive care alone, both in terms of survival and quality of life. In a large randomized trial, gemcitabine plus vinorelbine failed to show any advantage over either agent alone. Subset analyses suggest that the efficacy of platinum-based combination chemotherapy is similar in fit older and younger patients, with an acceptable increase in toxicity for elderly patients. These data should be interpreted cautiously because retrospective subgroup analyses are encumbered by selection bias; hence, randomized trials dedicated to platinum-based chemotherapy for nonselected elderly patients are warranted. Several promising biologic therapies are under investigation; however, with present data, target-based agents as first-line treatment for elderly NSCLC patients are not yet recommended. Clinical research, with trials specifically designed for elderly patients, is mandatory. With the current evidence, single-agent chemotherapy with a third-generation drug (vinorelbine, gemcitabine, a taxane) should be the recommended option for nonselected elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. Platinum-based chemotherapy is a viable option for fit patients with adequate organ function. Best supportive care remains important, in addition to chemotherapy or as the exclusive option for patients who are unsuitable for more aggressive treatment.     

多西他赛单药治疗老年晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察

目的：观察多西他赛单药治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌（ＮＳＣＬＣ）老年患者的临床疗效和不良反应。方法：４２例晚期ＮＳＣＬＣ初治老年患者予以多西他赛７０ｍｇ／ｍ^２治疗,２１天为１周期,治疗２～４周期,随访至疾病进展和死亡。结果：ＣＲ１例,ＰＲ９例,ＳＤ１３例,ＰＤ１７例,总有效率（ＣＲ＋ＰＲ）３５.０％,疾病控制率（ＣＲ＋ＰＲ＋ＳＤ）５７.５％,中位无进展生存期４.２个月,中位生存期６.１个月,１年生存率为３５.８％。主要毒副反应为骨髓抑制和血小板减少。结论：多西他赛单药治疗老年晚期ＮＳＣＬＣ有效且耐受性好。