Saving diabetic foot ulcers from amputation by surgical debridement and maggot therapy: A case report

Introduction and importanceA diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is one of the major diabetes complications that may lead to limb amputation. Amputation can have profound physical and psychological effects on an individual's life. Nowadays, the prevention of limb amputation and treatment of DFUs are known as the major health challenges.Case presentationThe present case report is of a 72-year-old woman with a 20-year history of type 2 diabetes who has had asymmetrical and superficial DFUs with sizes of 6 × 5 cm and 3 × 3 cm on the heel and the sole of the right foot, respectively. The ulcers were infected by S. aureus and E. coli. The patient had been hospitalized several times for receiving treatment, and not only the ulcers had not been healed, but also they had considerably extended so that the risk of foot amputation had been greatly increased. The patient was transferred to our wound care service. After conducting one session of surgical debridement, the patient underwent ten sessions of maggot therapy (one session every two days) using sterile Lucilia sericata. After about six months, the patient's DFUs were completely healed.Clinical discussionDFU can affect a patient's quality of life and lead to infection, sepsis, amputation, and even patient death. Therefore, using effective treatment approaches is very important for the management of DFUs.ConclusionThe combined use of surgical debridement and maggot therapy is a safe and effective method for improving diabetic foot ulcers and preventing amputation.     

负压创面治疗结合植皮术修复糖尿病足溃疡的临床研究

目的:通过与生物敷料覆盖结合植皮术比较,探讨负压创面治疗(NPWT)结合植皮术修复糖尿病足溃疡的临床疗效与优势。方法:回顾分析2010年6月～2012年1月入院治疗的18例糖尿病足溃疡患者,根据治疗方法不同分为两组。两组患者性别、年龄、病程、溃疡面积等一般资料比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),具有可比性。生物敷料覆盖组(对照组)10例患者,入院后行清创,创面覆盖生物敷料(异种脱细胞真皮基质),换药至创基肉芽新鲜,再予以植皮术。NPWT组8例患者,入院后行清创,应用封闭负压引流技术(VSD),酌情更换VSD至创基肉芽新鲜后,再予以植皮术,术后继续应用VSD。观察记录两组创基准备时间、植皮成活例数、住院天数及溃疡复发例数,并进行统计学分析。结果:对照组:创基准备时间为(25.8±12.4)天,植皮术后2周4例患者创面移植皮片完全成活,6例患者经二次植皮或换药愈合,住院时间(42.7±26.7)天,出院后随访6个月,5例患者创面溃疡复发。NPWT组:创基准备时间(14.7±13.1)天,植皮术后2周8例患者创面植皮完全成活,住院时间(29.6±12.3)天,随访6个月无溃疡复发。与对照组比较,NPWT组患者创基准备与住院时间显著缩短(P<0.01),植皮成活率显著增高(P<0.05),出院后溃疡复发率显著降低(P<0.05)。结论:应用NPWT修复糖尿病足溃疡的疗效明显优于生物敷料覆盖技术。NPWT可缩短糖尿病足溃疡创基准备和住院时间,确保植皮成活,防止溃疡复发。     

A comparison of diabetic foot ulcer outcomes using negative pressure wound therapy versus historical standard of care

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a leading cause of morbidity and hospitalisation among patients with diabetes. We analysed claims data for Medicare part B diabetic foot ulcer patients treated with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy at home (N = 1135) and diabetic foot ulcer patients from a published meta-analysis of randomised controlled wet-to-moist therapy. The expected costs of care for the two treatments were also compared. A significantly greater proportion of wounds treated with NPWT achieved a successful treatment endpoint compared with wet-to-moist therapy at both 12 weeks (39.5% versus 23.9%; P < 0.001) and 20 weeks (46.3% versus 32.8%; P < 0.001). NPWT-treated patients reached a successful wound treatment endpoint more rapidly, and the benefit was apparent in all wound sizes. Expected 20-week treatment costs for NPWT were similar to those for wet-to-moist therapy if one nursing visit per day for the latter is assumed but 42% less if two nursing visits per day are made. Thus, NPWT may improve the proportion of DFUs that attain a successful wound treatment endpoint and decrease resource utilisation by a given health care system compared with standard wet-to-moist therapy.     

Novel foam dressing using negative pressure wound therapy with instillation to remove thick exudate

We describe our experience with a novel foam dressing architecture in tandem with negative pressure wound therapy and instillation (NPWTi‐d) for removing viscous wound exudate and infectious materials. A retrospective review was conducted of the outcomes of 21 patients who received NPWTi‐d using a reticulated open cell foam instillation dressing with through holes (ROCF‐CC) designed to facilitate the removal of thick wound exudate and infectious materials. NPWTi‐d with ROCF‐CC was used to treat large complex chronic wounds with viscous wound exudate that contained substantial areas of devitalised tissue. Debridement was performed as appropriate or available. NPWTi‐d with ROCF‐CC assisted in loosening, solubilising and detaching viscous exudate, dry fibrin, wet slough and other infectious materials. Percent surface area of black non‐viable tissue and yellow fibrinous slough was reduced to ≤ 10% in 18/21 (85·7%) and 12/21 (57·1%) wounds, respectively, after an average of 1–3 applications (3–9 days) of NPWTi‐d with ROCF‐CC. Preliminary evidence suggests that adjunctive use of NPWTi‐d with ROCF‐CC may help clean large, complex wounds when complete surgical debridement is not possible or appropriate and/or when areas of slough and non‐viable tissue remain present on the wound surface.     

负压创面治疗联合高压氧治疗糖尿病足的临床疗效

目的 探讨负压创面治疗联合高压氧治疗糖尿病足的临床疗效.方法 采用回顾性病例对照研究分析江苏大学附属人民医院整形烧伤科自2013年2月至2017年12月收治的46例糖尿病足患者的临床资料,根据治疗方法分为对照组(24例)和联合治疗组(22例).糖尿病足创面按Wagner分级为3～5级;共46足.对照组采用控制血糖、抗感...     

Surgical wound case studies with the versatile 1 wound vacuum system for negative pressure wound therapy.

Negative pressure wound therapy consists of a wound dressing, a drainage tube inserted into the dressing, an occlusive transparent film, and a connection to a vacuum source that supplies the negative pressure. A new product called the Versatile 1 Wound Vacuum System (BlueSky Medical, La Costa, Calif) is available for negative pressure wound therapy. This article describes the application, management, and effectiveness of the Versatile 1 in 3 cases where the patients have all undergone surgical debridement.     

Surgical soft tissue closure of severe diabetic foot infections: a combination of biologics, negative pressure wound therapy, and skin grafting

Creative surgical strategies are often warranted for long-term closure of diabetic foot wounds. This article provides a case report describing the successive use of negative pressure wound therapy, advanced biologics, and split thickness skin grafting for healing an extensive surgical wound. Although the success of these therapies is enticing, their use should be based on careful patient selection in a multidisciplinary setting.     

Management of a complex hind foot war injury with negative pressure wound therapy: A case study

We report the use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) in a 39 year old patient with a complex open hind foot injury. The patient sustained an open calcaneal fracture with extensive soft tissue damage following the detonation of an explosively formed penetrating round in a confined space. A remarkable recovery was made following surgical debridement, internal fixation of the fracture and use of NPWT over the soft tissue injury. The patient returned to his normal level of function, without complications within a few months.     

Randomized clinical study to compare negative pressure wound therapy with simultaneous saline irrigation and traditional negative pressure wound therapy for complex foot infections

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of different negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) devices and NPWT with and without simultaneous irrigation in patients admitted to hospital with moderate and severe foot infections. Ninety patients were randomized in a 12‐week prospective, randomized noninferiority trial to compare wound healing in patients with moderate and severe infected foot wounds treated with NPWT after surgery. Inclusion criteria included ABI > 0.5 or toe pressures >30 PVR/mmHg, >18 years of age and exclusion included active Charcot arthropathy, collagen vascular disease, HIV, and hypercoagulable state. We compared two different traditional devices, NPWT‐K (KCI, VAC Ulta) and NPWT‐C (Cardinal, PRO), and NPWT‐I with saline irrigation (Cardinal, PRO). All patients had therapy delivered at 125 mmHg continuous pressure. In patients who received simultaneous saline irrigation (NPWT‐I), the administration rate was 15 ml per hour. The primary outcome was the proportion of healed wounds in 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included surgical wound closure, number of surgeries, length of stay, and time to wound healing. Continuous data was presented as mean ± standard deviation. Analysis of variance was used to compare continuous variables and chi‐square to compare dichotomous variables with an alpha of 0.05. There were no differences in outcomes among NPWT‐I, NPWT‐C, and NPWT‐K groups in proportion of healed wounds (63.3%, 50.0%, 46.7% p = 0.39), surgical wound closure (83.3%, 80.0%, 63.3%, p = 0.15), number of surgeries (2.0 ± 0.49, 2.4 ± 0.77, 2.4 ± 0.68, p = 0.06), length of stay (16.3 ± 15.7, 14.7 ± 7.4, 15.3 ± 10.5 days, p = 0.87), time to wound healing (46.2 ± 22.8, 40.9 ± 18.8, 45.9 ± 28.3 days, p = 0.78). We did not identify any significant differences in clinical outcomes or adverse events between patients treated with different NPWT devices or NPWT with and without irrigation.     

Outcome predictors for wound healing in patients with a diabetic foot ulcer

The aim of this study was to identify diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) patients at risk for the development of a hard‐to‐heal wound. This is a post‐hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study including a total of 208 patients with a DFU. The primary endpoints were time to healing and the development of a hard‐to‐heal‐wound. Univariable and multivariable logistic and Cox regression analysis were used to study the associations of patient characteristics with the primary endpoints. The number of previous DFUs [odds ratio (OR): 1.42, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01‐1.99, P = .04], University of Texas (UT) classification grade 2 (OR: 2.93, 95% CI: 1.27‐6.72, P = .01), UT classification grade 3 (OR: 2.80, 95% CI: 1.17‐6.71, P = .02), and a diagnosis of foot stand deformation (OR: 1.54, 95% CI: 0.77‐3.08, P = .05) were significantly associated with the development of a hard‐to‐heal wound. Only UT classification grade 3 (HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.41‐0.90, P = .01) was associated with time to healing. The number of previous DFUs, UT classification grade, and a diagnosis of foot deformation are significantly associated with development of a hard‐to‐heal wound in patients with a DFU. The only predictor significantly associated with time to healing was UT classification grade 3. These patient characteristics can be used to identify patients at risk for the development of hard‐to‐heal wounds, who might need an early intervention to prevent wound problems.     

Patient's pain feedback using negative pressure wound therapy with foam and gauze

Wounds can be caused by different mechanisms and have a significant morbidity and mortality. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is one of the most successful treatment modalities for wound healing. We have been using both foam and gauze-based NPWT. During application of NPWT, we noticed that the patient's pain was of varying intensity depending on the filler used. The aim of our work was to compare the level of pain and feedback before, during the treatment and at the dressing change after treatment with NPWT with two different fillers. For this study, we compared a pool of 13 gauze-treated patients with a pool of 18 foam-treated patients regarding the level of pain and feedback before, during the treatment and at the dressing change after treatment with NPWT. They were all post-traumatic patients with loss of tissue up to the muscular band. The patients were asked to respond to a questionnaire interviewed by the same physician to assess the level of pain using VNS (verbal numerical scale). We observed similar difference of means before and during the treatment with NPWT with gauze and foam. Regarding the pain at the dressing change, the mean of the scores for the foam was 6·5 while for the gauze was 4·15. In this case, we noticed the most significant difference between means from the scores given: 2·35 which was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0·046). The finding of this study confirms less pain at the dressing change after treatment with gauze-based NPWT. In our opinion, this finding is related to the more adhesive property of the foam probably because of the ingrowth of the granulation tissue in the micropores present on the foam. Considering this statement, we recommend the foam for neuropathic and paraplegic patients and the gauze for patients with bone and tendon exposition wounds, patients that do not tolerate NPWT with foam and low compliant patient particularly paediatric and old-age patients. We remind that the performance of this study was not sponsored by any company.     

皮肤牵张联合可调式负压吸引装置治疗难愈性褥疮

目的总结难愈性褥疮的治疗体会。方法褥疮Ⅳ期(深溃疡)患者40例,随机分为实验组和对照组。两组患者在手术前均进行支持治疗、清创及应用可调式负压吸引装置处理创面,待创面清洁、肉芽新鲜后行手术治疗封闭压疮创面。对照组19例(28侧),采用传统植皮术或皮瓣转移术,实验组21例(32侧),在清除死腔后利用皮肤牵张闭合器术中扩张牵引,减少创缘张力后一期缝合创面,术后持续使用牵张器2~3周。结果对照组平均住院时间(58.2±2.1)天,术后瘢痕明显有组织供区损伤。实验组平均住院时间(50.8±3.2)天,术后瘢痕不明显,无供区组织损伤,患者满意度高。与对照组相比,实验组住院时间明显缩短,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论使用皮肤牵张闭合器联合可调式负压吸引装置治疗难愈性褥疮具有方法简单、结果可靠、创伤较小、并发症少等优点。     

A case history of multimodal therapy in healing a complicated diabetic foot wound: negative pressure, dermal replacement and pulsed radio frequency energy therapies

Advanced multimodal therapies are being used with increasing frequency in the management of difficult or complex wounds. Although the primary goal remains to expedite complete healing, secondary goals include avoidance of superimposed infection, repeated hospitalisations and subsequent amputations. We describe a case involving a limb- and life-threatening necrotising infection in a diabetic patient in which we successfully applied negative pressure wound therapy, dermal replacement therapy and pulsed radio frequency energy to achieve definitive healing. Further study is warranted to elucidate the most effective combinations of such therapies to promote healing of similarly complex wounds.     

Effect of ultrasound-supported wound debridement in subjects with diabetic foot ulcers: A meta-analysis

A meta-analysis study to assess the effect of ultrasound-supported wound debridement (USSD) in subjects with diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). A comprehensive literature examination till January 2023 was implemented and 1873 linked studies were appraised. The picked studies contained 577 subjects with DFUs in the studies' baseline, 282 of them were using USSD, 204 were using standard care, and 91 were using a placebo. Odds ratio (OR) in addition to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to calculate the consequence of USSD in subjects with DFUs by the dichotomous styles and a fixed or random effect model. The USSD applied to DFU caused a significantly higher wound healing rate compared with the standard care (OR, 3.08; 95% CI, 1.94–4.88, P < .001) with no heterogeneity (I² = 0%) and the placebo (OR, 7.61; 95% CI, 3.11–18.63, P = .02) with no heterogeneity (I² = 0%). The USSD applied to DFUs caused a significantly higher wound healing rate compared with the standard care and the placebo. Though precautions should be taken when commerce with the consequences as all of the picked studies for this meta-analysis was with low sample sizes.     

Autologous wound margin point columnar full-thickness skin grafting combined with negative pressure wound therapy improves wound healing in refractory diabetic foot ulcers

Diabetic lower extremity ulcers (DLEUs) are a severe complication of diabetes mellitus (DM) and are difficult to heal. This study aimed to explore the efficacy of autologous point columnar full-thickness skin graft taken from the ulcer wound margin combined with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in refractory DLEUs. This is a prospective cohort study. A total of 40 inpatients with refractory DLEUs were recruited in the Diabetes Foot Center of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region People's Hospital from October 2019 to November 2021. According to the doctors' professional suggestions and the patients' personal wishes, these enrolled patients were divided into two groups based on different topical wound management: the graft group (n = 18) and the conventional wound therapeutic (CWT) group (n = 22). The efficacy evaluations included the time to complete re-epithelialization of the wound and healing speed within 14 days of graft treatment or after 14 days of graft treatment in the two groups. Before the treatment, the graft group had a significantly larger ulcer area than the CWT group [27.22 (15.28, 46.59) versus 10.92 (7.00, 24.93) cm², P < .01]. However, the time to complete wound re-epithelialization in the graft group was shorter than in the CWT group [58.22 ± 30.60 versus 86.09 ± 49.54 d, P < .05]. Meanwhile, the healing speed in graft group was markedly faster than in CWT group, whether within 14 days [0.60 (0.40, 0.92) versus 0.16 (0.07, 0.34) cm²/d, P < .01] or after 14 days of graft treatment [0.57 (0.45, 0.91) versus 0.13 (0.08, 0.27) cm²/d, P < .01]. However, the total treatment cost in the graft group was lower than in the CWT group [419.59 ± 137.20 versus 663.97 ± 497.02 $, P < .05]. The novel treatment modality of autologous full-thickness skin graft taken from the ulcer wound margin combined with NPWT has hereby proposed for the first time, and is a safe, effective, and reliable method with a good performance-to-cost ratio to promote wound healing and shorten the healing time for DLEUs.     

Use of negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and a reticulated open cell foam dressing with through holes in the acute care setting

Negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell time (NPWTi‐d) is an automated system used to deliver, dwell, and remove topical solutions from the wound bed. Recently, a reticulated open cell foam dressing with through holes (ROCF‐CC) was developed, which assists with wound cleansing by removing thick exudate and infectious materials. We present our experience using NPWTi‐d with ROCF‐CC on complex wounds when complete surgical debridement was inappropriate because of medical instability, recurrent non‐viable tissue, or palliative treatment plan. For all wounds, NPWTi‐d with ROCF‐CC was initiated by instilling normal saline, acetic acid, or hypochlorous acid with 2 to 10 minutes of dwell time, followed by 0.5 to 4 hours of negative pressure. Dressings were changed every 2 to 3 days. Fourteen patients with multiple comorbidities were treated for wound types including diabetic foot ulcers, necrotising fasciitis, dehisced wounds, and pressure injuries. Duration of NPWTi‐d with ROCF‐CC ranged from 1 to 15 days, and at dressing changes, wounds showed improved granulation tissue formation, less malodour, less surrounding erythema, and demarcation of healthy skin from devitalised tissue. Based on these patients, adjunctive use of NPWTi‐d with ROCF‐CC provided a practical option for improving tissue quality in wounds for patients in whom surgical debridement was not possible or desired.     

A randomized,controlled trial of negative pressure wound therapy of pressure ulcers via a novel polyurethane foam

The objectives of the study were (1) to look for any local, clinically apparent response, within and around a debrided wound, to a novel biocompatible polyurethane foam during repeated, short‐term implantation, and (2) to assess the material's efficacy as a negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) interface compared with a widely used, commercially available foam. Twenty pressure ulcers in 18 patients underwent surgical debridement, then randomization to receive novel treatment or control foam as the wound interface for NPWT. Dressing changes every 2–3 days allowed qualitative wound assessment and quantitative measurement to compare outcomes. No adverse reaction was observed in any patient receiving the new foam. The new “novel foam” performed as a NPWT interface as effectively as the control “standard foam.” In deep wounds, the new foam was easier to remove, fragmented less, and showed less retention than the control foam. No marginal in‐growth occurred, making removal less traumatic and reducing bleeding from cavity wall granulations. The results support previous large animal studies, and independent ISO10993 testing, that the new foam is safe and biocompatible. Its efficacy as an NPWT interface, nontraumatic removal with low fragmentation and retention rate, favors the new material, especially in deep cavity wounds.