Is frozen shoulder completely resolved at 2 years after the onset of disease?

BackgroundAlthough numerous studies have suggested that frozen shoulder (FS) is a self-limiting disease with most patients recovering within 2 years, its long-term outcome is still controversial. The aims of this study were to evaluate the clinical outcomes after conservative treatment for FS and to determine the predictors of its clinical outcome.MethodsThis study included 234 shoulders of 215 patients who received conservative treatment for FS. The mean follow-up period was 41.8 months (range 27–117 months). Initial evaluation included demographics, detailed medical history, and clinical assessments of shoulder status. Questionnaires, which included the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) and satisfaction grading for the current shoulder status were assessed at the final follow-up.ResultsThe mean VAS pain score, ASES score, and SSV significantly improved from 6.7, 37.0, and 40.1% at the time of initial evaluation to 1.5, 87.6, and 85.0% at the final follow-up evaluation (all p < 0.001). According to satisfaction grading, the shoulder status at the final follow-up was very satisfied in 101 shoulders (43.2%), satisfied in 68 (29.1%), fair in 37 (15.8%), unsatisfied in 20 (8.5%), and very unsatisfied in 8 (3.4%). Univariate analysis revealed that gender, diabetes, simultaneous bilateral involvement, overall bilateral involvement and duration of symptoms were associated with clinical outcomes at the final follow-up. Multivariate analysis revealed that duration of symptoms (p = 0.002) was an independent risk factor for unsuccessful outcome.ConclusionsAt the mean follow-up period of 41.8 months, 72.3% of patients revealed subjective satisfaction for the current shoulder status. Duration of symptoms was an independent risk factor for poor prognosis.     

关节镜下Bankart损伤修复联合Remplissage填塞术治疗合并Hill-Sachs缺损的成年人复发性肩关节前脱位

目的:探讨关节镜下Bankart损伤修补术联合Remplissage填塞术治疗复发性肩关节前脱位合并Hill-Sachs损伤的方法和临床疗效.方法:回顾性分析2016年3月至2019年3月行关节镜下Bankart损伤修复治疗关节盂骨缺损＜20％的复发性肩关节前脱位患者106例,其中男76例,女30例;年龄18～45(2...     

Using inertial measurement units to quantify shoulder elevation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a pilot study comparing goniometric measures captured clinically to inertial measures captured ‘in-the-wild’

BackgroundReverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is utilized for a variety of indications, but most commonly for patients with rotator cuff arthropathy. This procedure reduces pain, improves satisfaction, and increases clinically measured range of motion (ROM). However, traditional clinical ROM measurements captured via goniometer may not accurately represent ‘real-world’ utilization of ROM. In contrast, inertial measurement units (IMUs) are useful for establishing ROM outside the clinical setting. We sought to measure ‘real-world’ ROM after rTSA using IMUs.MethodsA previously validated IMU-based method for continuously capturing shoulder elevation was used to assess 10 individuals receiving rTSA (1M, 82 ± 5 years) and compared to a previously captured 10 healthy individuals (4M, 69 ± 20 years) without shoulder dysfunction. Control subject data were previously collected over 1 week of continuous use. Patients undergoing rTSA donned sensors for 1 week pre-rTSA, 6 weeks at 3 months post-rTSA following clearance to perform active-independent ROM, and 1 week at 1 year and 2 years post-rTSA. Shoulder elevation was computed continuously each day. Daily continuous elevation was broken into 5° angle ‘bins’ (eg, 0-5°, 5-10°, etc.) and converted to percentage of the total day. IMU-based outcome measures were ROM binned percent (as described previously) and maximum/average elevation each week. Clinical goniometric ROM and patient-reported outcome measures were also captured.ResultsNo differences existed between patient and healthy control demographics. While patients showed improvement in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) score, pain score, and goniometric ROM, IMU-based average and maximum elevation were equal between control subjects and patients both pre- and post-rTSA. The percent of time spent above 90° was equal between cohorts pre-rTSA, rose significantly at 3 months post-rTSA, and returned to preoperative levels thereafter.DiscussionAlthough pain, satisfaction, and ROM measured clinically may improve following rTSA, real-world utilization of improved ROM was not seen herein. Improvements during the acute rehabilitation phase may be transient, indicating longer or more specific rehabilitation protocols are necessary to see chronic improvements in post-rTSA movement patterns.     

关节镜下治疗肱骨近端骨折内固定术后冻结肩

目的探讨肩关节镜下治疗肱骨近端骨折术后冻结肩的疗效。方法对61例肱骨近端骨折切开复位内固定术后冻结肩患者采用全身麻醉肩关节镜下治疗联合关节松解、内固定装置取除术。比较手术前后肩关节活动范围、UCLA评分及ASES评分。结果关节镜下肱骨近端骨折内固定术后冻结肩常见有关节内病变。52例完成术后12~18个月的随访,9例失访。52例肩关节活动度、UCLA评分和ASES评分末次随访均较术前改善(P<0.05)。结论肩关节镜下治疗联合关节松解、内固定装置取除术有助于改善肱骨近端骨折内固定术后冻结肩患者的肩关节功能。     

肩袖撕裂合并冻结肩行手法松解后的关节镜下表现及影响因素分析

目的 观察肩袖撕裂合并冻结肩行手法松解后的关节镜下表现,并分析其影响因素。方法 回顾性分析2017年9月至2019年9月收治的68例肩袖撕裂合并冻结肩病人的病例资料,其中,男35例,女33例,年龄为（52.68±6.54）岁,均行一期麻醉后手法松解联合关节镜检查并肩袖修复术,观察手法松解后的关节镜下表现,比较松解损伤病人和未损伤病人之间的性别、患侧、肩袖撕裂程度差异,分析患肩关节疼痛时间、肩关节活动受限病程和实施手法松解时间与手法松解损伤的相关性。收集病人的数字分级法（numerical rating scale, NRS）疼痛评分、美国肩肘外科医师学会（American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, ASES）评分、Constant-Murley评分及丹麦健康与医疗管理局（Danish Health and Medicine Authority）满意度评分。结果 共16例（23.53%）发生手法松解损伤,其中单一损伤者12例,两种及以上损伤者4例,损伤类型为前关节囊撕裂（3例,18.75%）、下关节囊撕裂（6例,37.50%）、盂肱中韧带撕裂（7例,43.75%）、盂肱下韧带肱骨端撕裂（humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligament, HAGL）（3例,18.75%）、前盂唇撕裂（2例,12.50%）。松解损伤病人和未损伤病人之间的年龄（P=0.431）、性别（P=0.893）、患侧（P=0.673）、肩袖撕裂程度（P=0.723）、患肩关节疼痛时间（P=0.813）、肩关节活动受限病程（P=0.250）、实施手法松解时间（P=0.125）均未见显著差异。松解损伤组和松解无损伤组术后NRS评分均较术前明显降低,肩关节功能评分较术前明显改善（P均＜0.05）;手术前后的NRS评分、肩关节功能ASES评分、Constant-Murley评分、病人满意度评分比较,差异均无统计学意义（P均＞0.05）。结论 肩袖撕裂合并冻结肩行麻醉后肩关节手法松解联合关节镜下肩袖修复术可能导致单一或合并的镜下损伤表现,年龄、性别、患侧、肩袖撕裂程度、患肩关节疼痛时间、肩关节活动受限病程、实施手法松解时间等因素与发生手法松解损伤无明确相关性。     

Outcomes after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with long-term disability claims

BackgroundStudies have shown that patients with workers' compensation claims have worse clinical outcomes after various orthopedic procedures. This study aimed to determine the influence of disability status on 2-year clinical outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA).MethodsReview of an institutional database identified patients on disability with a minimum of 2-year follow-up and compared them to a comorbidity-matched cohort of patients without disability claims. Assessments between patients included preoperative and postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, strength, range of motion (ROM), and postoperative complications.ResultsForty-eight shoulders (45 patients) were in the ATSA cohort (24 with disability, 24 without disability) and 46 shoulders (45 patients) in the RTSA cohort (23 with disability, 23 without disability). Patients in the ATSA cohort with disability claims had higher 3-month and 2-year VAS scores (4 vs. 1, P = .003; 4 vs. 1, P = .02, respectively), lower 2-year ASES scores (58 vs. 87, P = .015), and decreased forward elevation ROM and internal rotation ROM (150 vs. 170, P = .017; 60 vs. 62.5, P = .024, respectively) compared to the cohort without disability. Significant differences in baseline values also were noted between cohorts (lower preoperative ASES: 31.7 vs. 40.5, P = .033; higher VAS: 7 vs. 6, P = .03; decreased forward elevation ROM: 90 vs. 110, P = .02). Patients in the RTSA cohort with disability claims had higher 3-month and 2-year VAS (5 vs. 1, P = .02; 3 vs. 0.5, P = .04, respectively) scores than those without claims. The baseline values for the disability cohort with RTSA demonstrated lower ASES (22.1 vs. 43.6, P = .005) and higher VAS (8 vs. 4, P = .004) scores. No significant differences were noted in improvement for the ATSA or RTSA cohorts in any parameter. The ATSA with disability cohort had a higher complication rate (45% vs. 16.6%, P = .0299). No differences were noted in complication rates in the RTSA group.ConclusionPatients who have reported disability status demonstrated worse outcomes after ATSA and RTSA compared to patients without disability claims. However, there was no significant difference in the amount of change in outcomes between groups, indicating that patients on disability can still realize significant improvements after shoulder arthroplasty.     

Clinical and patient-reported outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients receiving Social Security Disability Insurance or workers’ compensation

BackgroundEvidence suggests that reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) patients receiving workers’ compensation (WC) have worse patient-reported outcomes (PROs) than those not receiving WC. It is unknown whether Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) recipients also have worse outcomes of RSA. Our goals were to (1) compare PROs and range of motion (ROM) after RSA according to whether patients were receiving SSDI, WC, or neither form of assistance, and (2) identify factors associated with poor PROs.MethodsFrom a US institutional database of 454 patients who underwent RSA from January 2009 through December 2016, we identified 19 SSDI recipients and 25 WC recipients. From the same database, we created a control group of 81 patients not receiving SSDI or WC, matched by demographic variables. Between groups, we compared age, sex, operative arm dominance, preoperative diagnosis, number of previous shoulder surgeries, primary or revision arthroplasty, and Charlson Comorbidity Index value. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively by physical examination, including range of motion, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, L'Insalata score, Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) score. Significance was set at P< .05. Clinical relevance of improvements in forward flexion and abduction, VAS for pain, ASES, and SST were evaluated using established minimal clinically important difference (MCID) values.ResultsBoth the SSDI and WC groups experienced statistically significant improvements from preoperatively to postoperatively; these improvements exceeded MCID thresholds for forward flexion and abduction, VAS for pain, ASES (except in WC group), and SST score (all, P< .05). These outcomes were not significantly different between the SSDI and WC groups. Compared with the control group, both the SSDI and WC groups had statistically significantly worse outcomes for these same measures. The only factor associated with poor clinical outcomes was having undergone ≥2 previous surgical procedures on the same shoulder for which RSA was performed in both SSDI (odds ratio = 2.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.0-5.4) and WC (odds ratio = 1.6, 95% confidence interval: 1.1-4.5) groups.ConclusionAmong RSA patients, SSDI recipients did not have worse clinical outcomes than WC recipients. Having undergone ≥2 previous procedures on the same shoulder was associated with poor outcomes in both groups. These findings should be considered when determining the appropriateness of RSA for SSDI and WC recipients.Level of evidenceLevel III; Retrospective Cohort Comparison; Treatment Study     

肩胛下肌强化缝合术治疗伴有严重盂唇损伤的复发性肩关节脱位

目的:探讨肩胛下肌强化缝合术治疗伴有严重盂唇损伤的复发性肩关节脱位的方法和临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析2019年3月至2020年8月行肩胛下肌强化缝合术(arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation,ASA)治疗伴有严重盂唇损伤的复发性肩关节脱位的患者16例,其中男10例,女6例;年龄18~50(29.06±10.54)岁;左肩4例,右肩12例。在手术前后采用疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS),美国肩肘外科协会(American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons,ASES)评分及肩关节功能Rowe评分对肩关节功能和稳定性进行评估。结果:16例患者均获随访,时间12~29(18.75±7.26)个月。VAS由术前的(5.25±1.13)分降至末次随访的(1.37±0.65)分;ASES评分由术前的(59.44±9.93)分增加至末次随访的(90.88±4.00)分;肩关节Rowe 评分由术前的(51.56±8.89)分增加至末次随访的(92.19±7.06)分(P<0.05)。随访期间未见肩关节脱位,所有患者术后未出现切口感染、血管神经损伤等临床并发症。结论:肩胛下肌强化缝合术是治疗伴有严重盂唇损伤的复发性肩关节脱位的有效方法,并且患者的外旋功能几乎不受影响。     

The influence of computed tomography preoperative planning on clinical outcomes after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a matched cohort analysis

BackgroundEvaluation, characterization, and correction of glenoid deformity are an important part of performing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) planning has been shown to improve implant position, but the impact on clinical outcomes is less clear. The purpose of the current study is to compare clinical outcomes of TSA performed with 3D CT preoperative planning with matched controls performed without CT-based planning.MethodsUtilizing a multicenter shoulder arthroplasty registry, patients who underwent a TSA with 2-year clinical follow-up were retrospectively identified. These patients were divided into two cohorts based on technique for glenoid guide pin placement based on surgeon preference: 1) those who utilized 3D preoperative templating with or without patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and 2) a control group of TSAs performed without 3D CT preoperative planning. The two groups were matched 1:1 based on age, sex, and baseline American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. Patient-reported outcomes and active range of motion (ROM) obtained at 2 years postoperatively were assessed and compared between the two cohorts. A subgroup analysis was also performed comparing outcomes in patients with 3D CT preoperative planning with and without PSI.ResultsData collection was performed on 84 study patients with 3D CT preoperative planning (51 with PSI and 33 without) and 84 matched control patients without CT-based planning (168 patients in total). Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. Improvement from baseline for the ASES score (study group: 45.4, controls: 39.0, P = .029) and external rotation at 90^° of abduction (study group: 42^° vs. 29^°, P = .009) was significantly greater in the CT-based planning group than that in matched controls. There were no other significant differences in improvement in outcomes or ROM between the two groups. Within the 3D CT cohort, there were no significant differences in patient-reported outcomes or ROM between TSAs performed with or without PSI. A significantly greater percentage of patients with 3D CT planning achieved a patient acceptable symptomatic state than controls (89% vs. 75%, P = .016).ConclusionTSAs performed with 3D CT preoperative glenoid planning with or without utilization of PSI were associated with statistically significantly greater improvement from baseline in ASES scores and external rotation at 90^° of abduction than TSA performed without 3D CT planning. The clinical significance of this finding is unclear, as the differences failed to meet a clinically significant threshold.     

关节镜松解术结合手法治疗肩凝症的病例对照研究

目的：比较关节镜松解术后采用常规康复方法及结合应用手法治疗难治性肩凝症的疗效,评价手法治疗的应用价值.方法：自2007年3月至2010年7月,对符合肩凝症诊断标准、接受关节镜下粘连松解术的48例48肩（左肩23例,右肩25例）,分为手法治疗组和常规康复治疗组.常规康复治疗组26例,男11例,女15例;手法治疗组22例,男9例,女13例.手法治疗组除术后常规康复外接受手法推拿干预,手法治疗原则初期为活血止痛,后期为松解粘连、滑利关节,推拿治疗时间每次20 min,每日2次,共治疗10d.对所有患者进行随访,记录术前、术后各随访点的ASES评分及肩关节活动范围.结果：48例均获随访,时间4～25个月,平均（12.54±5.78）个月.术后1个月时,手法治疗组ASES评分和肩关节前屈活动度优于常规康复治疗组,末次随访时两组的各项随访指标差异均无统计学意义.结论：关节镜松解术结合术后手法治疗,有助于加快肩凝症患者的早期康复进程,帮助其尽早重返社会,但其远期关节功能与术后常规康复治疗相比无明显差异.     

Midterm results of two-stage revision surgery for periprosthetic shoulder infection

BackgroundTo our knowledge, no studies have reported clinical results at a midterm follow-up after two-stage revision for periprosthetic shoulder infection (PSI). Our purpose was to determine the recurrent infection rate and clinical outcomes of two-stage revision for PSI at a minimum follow-up of 5 years. The secondary aim was to evaluate the application of the new guidelines from the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) in 2018 for diagnosis of PSI in this cohort.MethodsWe identified 17 patients with infection after shoulder arthroplasty between 2005 and 2014 who were treated with a two-stage revision and had a minimum follow-up of 5 years (range, 5-9 years). The mean time from the involved arthroplasty to first-stage revision was 40 months. All patients were revised to a reverse shoulder arthroplasty at second-stage revision. Complications, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), visual analogue scale for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score, Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) score, and range of motion (ROM) were noted. Patients were retrospectively scored and categorized using the ICM 2018 diagnostic criteria. Mean patient age was 64 ± 7 years, and 65% of patients were male.ResultsA recurrent infection developed in 3 (18%) of the 17 patients. The cumulative incidence of recurrence of infection was 0% at 1 year, 6% at 2 years, and 18% at 5 years. There were 6 (36%) other complications, including 4 periprosthetic fractures, 1 spacer fracture, and 1 dislocation. Two (12%) patients had scapular notching. At latest follow-up, patients who did not have recurrent infection had a statistically and clinically meaningful improvement from preoperative to postoperative PROs, including VAS for pain, ASES score, SST score, and WOOS score, and active ROM, including abduction and forward flexion. Using the ICM 2018 criteria at first-stage revision surgery, the category of PSI for 10 (59%) patients was “definite PSI,” 4 (23%) patients was “probable PSI”, and 3 (18%) patients was “possible PSI.”ConclusionThe rate of reinfection after a two-stage revision surgery for PSI at midterm follow-up was 18%. Clinical outcomes were favorable in the patients who remained free of infection. Further prospective study of the ICM criteria as they apply to making the diagnosis of infection in these patients would be beneficial.Level of evidenceLevel IV; Case Series; Treatment Study     

Clinical results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in diabetic and non-diabetic patients

BackgroundAlthough the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) have been reported, few studies have focused on diabetic patients. We investigated and compared the clinical results of ARCR in patients with and without diabetes.MethodsThis retrospective study involved 195 consecutive patients who underwent ARCR from 2015 to 2018 in our hospital. Twenty-seven and 168 shoulders were assigned to diabetes and non-diabetes groups, respectively. Diabetic patients with poor control were preoperatively hospitalized for perioperative diabetic control. We evaluated range of motion (ROM), Japanese Orthopaedic Association shoulder (JOA) score, Constant Shoulder Score, and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score preoperatively and at 6 months and 1 year post-ARCR. Rates of rotator cuff retear 1 year post-ARCR and preoperative and postoperative stiff shoulder were also evaluated. We compared the results between groups and analyzed them statistically. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsPreoperative ROM, JOA score, Constant Shoulder Score and UCLA scores showed significant improvement at post-ARCR in both groups (p < 0.05). On comparing the groups, although preoperative JOA score and Constant Shoulder Score were significantly lower in diabetes group than in non-diabetes group (diabetic/non-diabetic group; 60.0/65.3 for JOA score; p = 0.003, 59.7/64.2 for Constant Shoulder Score; p = 0.003), there was no significant difference postoperatively (6 months post-ARCR; 88.0/89.7 for JOA score; p = 0.783, 88.1/88.6 for Constant Shoulder Score; p = 0.597, 1 year post-ARCR; 96.7/95.4 for JOA score; p = 0.238, 96.6/95.4 for Constant Shoulder Score; p = 0.248). Furthermore, preoperative and postoperative stiff shoulder and retear rates were not significantly different between groups (p = 0.152, p = 0.344, p = 0.347, and p = 0.563, respectively).ConclusionDiabetic patients showed comparable clinical results with non-diabetic patients post-ARCR. Perioperative diabetic control may be recommended for preoperatively uncontrolled diabetic patients.     

The time of postoperative corticosteroid injection can be individualized after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

BackgroundIntra-articular corticosteroid injection is an effective treatment for pain and to improve the range of motion (ROM) of the shoulder joint. However, consideration of when it would be effective to inject corticosteroids after rotator cuff repair is more limited. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of corticosteroids injection given at 4 and 8 weeks after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.MethodsBetween December 2016 and January 2018, 42 patients who underwent arthroscopic supraspinatus tendon repair were enrolled. Nineteen patients received 40 mg of triamcinolone injection 4 weeks after surgery (group 1), while 23 patients received the same injection 8 weeks after surgery (group 2). Clinical outcome was evaluated using ROM, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score, Korean Shoulder score, and a visual analog scale (VAS) score before surgery and at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Tendon integrity was assessed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and sonography at 12 months after surgery.ResultsSignificant improvements in pain and functional scores were observed at the last follow-up in both groups (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS pain score between the two groups at any time point after surgery (p > 0.05). Functional scores and ROM in all directions also showed no statistical difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). Retears of the repaired tendon, assessed at 12 months postoperatively, were observed in two patients from group 1 (10.5%) and two patients from group 2 (8.7%), thus indicating no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05).ConclusionSince there was no significant difference in clinical outcomes and tendon integrity, postoperative corticosteroid injection can be individualized according to the patient for 4–8 weeks after the rotator cuff repair.     

Predictors of patient satisfaction and outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundObjective clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction via patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) can vary following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). The purpose of this study was to analyze patient specific preoperative factors that may predict postoperative PROMs and satisfaction following rTSA.MethodProspective data was collected on 144 consecutive patients who underwent primary rTSA at our institution between 2012 and 2018, all with minimum 2 year follow-up. Age, gender, race, BMI, previous surgery on the index shoulder, and comorbidity burden were analyzed as potential predictors. Shoulder specific clinical measures were collected both pre- and postoperatively via range of motion testing with active abduction, internal, and external rotation. PROMs included global shoulder function, Simple Shoulder Test (SST) and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scoring systems, and cumulative patient satisfaction. Statistical analysis included comparison of pre- and postoperative outcome measures across the cohort as a whole and between each of the potential predictors in question. The relationship between predictors and postoperative cumulative satisfaction was investigated, with specific attention to identify the strongest predictors and account for confounding variables. Statistical significance was determined at P < .05.ResultsAll range of motion scores and PROMs were significantly improved from preoperative to postoperative assessment. Patient satisfaction was excellent with 92% rating their shoulder as “much better” or “better.” Women and minority patients displayed significantly worse preoperative active abduction, SST, and ASES, but were found to have no significant difference in these measures postoperatively. Younger age was associated with a significantly worse postoperative ASES score. Female sex was associated with significantly higher postoperative satisfaction, while minority status was associated with significantly lower cumulative satisfaction. Postoperative global shoulder function, SST, and ASES were not significantly influenced by sex, race, previous surgery, BMI, or comorbidity burden. Postoperative ASES and global shoulder function demonstrated to be independent predictors of “much better” satisfaction rating.ConclusionPostoperative PROMs and cumulative satisfaction are not influenced by BMI, previous surgery, or comorbidity burden in our cohort. Relative to their respective counterparts, older patients, females, and white patients are more likely to demonstrate higher satisfaction with their outcome following rTSA as measured by PROMs or cumulative satisfaction. Improvements in the ASES and global shoulder function scores most consistently predict higher postoperative satisfaction.Level of evidenceLevel IV; Case Series; Treatment Study     

The effect of an early mobilization rehabilitation protocol on outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundGiven the continued growth of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), it is important to optimize factors that contribute to successful outcomes. Rehabilitation after RSA is critical to achieve successful outcomes including patient function and satisfaction; however, the ideal rehabilitation program has not been established. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of early mobilization (EM) compared with delayed mobilization (DM) on outcomes and function after RSA.MethodsA retrospective study of prospectively collected data was performed comparing 67 patients who underwent RSA in two groups: the EM group began a rehabilitation program immediately after surgery, and the DM group began after 4-6 weeks postoperatively. Preoperative and postoperative Constant shoulder score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Penn Shoulder Score (PSS), shoulder satisfaction value as well as demographics, opioid usage, range of motion, 90-day complications, reoperation, and readmission rates were collected. Statistical analysis was performed between each group’s outcomes and for the change (delta) of outcomes from baseline to each postoperative time point.ResultsAt 6 weeks postoperatively, the EM group showed significantly higher scores in ASES function, PSS, active forward elevation, passive forward elevation, active external rotation, and passive external rotation. There was significantly lower narcotic usage in the EM group at 6 weeks. At 3 months postoperatively, the EM group showed a lower numerical rating score for pain and higher active forward elevation. At the last follow-up, there was a lower numerical rating score and greater degree for all ranges of motion for the EM group than that for the DM group. A greater change from baseline to 6 weeks postoperatively was seen for the EM group in shoulder satisfaction value, ASES function, PSS, active forward elevation, passive forward elevation, and internal rotation. From baseline to 3 months postoperatively, ASES pain, PSS, active forward elevation, and passive forward elevation improved significantly in the EM group. At the final follow-up, active forward elevation increased greater for the EM group. There were 3 complications (2 hematomas and 1 infection) in the DM group and none in the EM group.ConclusionThe EM rehabilitation protocol after RSA achieved lower opioid usage at 6 weeks, lower pain scores at each time point, and better range of motion during the final follow-up than DM protocol. There were no complications reported with the EM protocol, suggesting it is a safe alternative for postoperative recovery. Orthopedic surgeons should consider the EM rehabilitation protocol after RSA.     

Is there a threshold of preoperative function that predicts failure to achieve clinically significant outcomes after total and reverse shoulder arthroplasty?

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to determine if there is a threshold of preoperative function that is predictive of postoperative outcomes and the likelihood of achieving clinically significant outcomes following shoulder arthroplasty (SA).MethodsWe retrospectively identified patients who underwent a primary SA at our institution. Patients with preoperative and postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (ASES) were included in our analysis. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was utilized to reach a preoperative ASES threshold correlated with achievement of the following clinically significant outcomes: minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptom state. This analysis was performed for our entire SA cohort and subanalyzed for total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Fischer exact tests were used to analyze categorical data while continuous data were analyzed using t-tests. For the ROC, area under the curve (AUC) was calculated, along with bootstrap 95% confidence intervals and P values, with <0.05 as significant.ResultsA total of 516 patients were included (164 TSA and 352 RSA). ROC analysis yielded a preoperative ASES above 54 as predictive of failure to achieve MCID for all SAs (AUC, 0.77; P < .001), above 49 for TSA (AUC 0.74, P < .001), and above 56 for RSA (AUC 0.79, P < .001). Patients with preoperative ASES scores above 54 were significantly less likely to achieve MCID (odds ratio 5.1, P < .001) and SCB (odds ratio 7.2, P < .001); however, they had higher postoperative ASES scores (84 vs. 78, P < .001). A preoperative ASES score of 73 corresponded to a 50% chance of achieving MCID. ROC analysis also yielded a preoperative ASES score above 51 as predictive of failure to achieve SCB for all SA, TSA, and RSA (AUC: 0.79, 0.78, and 0.80, respectively, all P < .001). A preop ASES score of 52 corresponded to a 50% chance of achieving SCB.ConclusionPreoperative ASES scores above 49-56 are predictive of failure to achieve MCID and SCB following TSA and RSA. Although patients above these preoperative thresholds achieve higher absolute ASES scores at the final follow-up, they experienced less relative improvement from baseline. This will help surgeons counsel individual patients about appropriate expectations after arthroplasty.     

Correlation of patient-reported outcome measurement information system-upper extremity with American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores in shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundMultiple outcome measure surveys are available to assess preoperative and postoperative outcomes for a variety of orthopedic procedures such as shoulder arthroplasty. Although legacy instruments such as American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) remain popular, there remains no singular gold standard survey instrument for shoulder arthroplasty patients, and alternative instruments have been developed to better capture clinical outcomes. The goal of this study is to compare the efficacy of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-Upper Extremity (PROMIS-UE) using computer adaptive technology with ASES scores both preoperatively and postoperatively in shoulder arthroplasty patients. Our hypothesis is that there would be a strong correlation between PROMIS-UE and ASES scores both preoperatively and postoperatively in total shoulder arthroplasty patients.MethodsPatients who underwent total shoulder arthroplasty and agreed to complete baseline and 1-year follow-up of ASES and PROMIS-UE scores were included. Patients also completed PROMIS-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) as a third point comparison. Responses to these instruments were statistically analyzed and compared using Pearson correlation coefficients. Floor and ceiling effects were then calculated.ResultsNinety patients were included in this study, all of whom completed the PROMIS-UE, PROMIS-PF, and ASES surveys both preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively. The mean age in this cohort was 68.9 years (standard deviation [SD] 8.4 years, range 39-89). The mean preoperative and postoperative PROMIS-UE scores were 26.6 (SD 6.7, range 14.7-44.6) and 41.8 (SD 10.3, range 20.2-56.4) respectively. Mean preoperative and postoperative PROMIS-PF computer adaptive technology scores were 35.7 (SD 9.54, range 34.2-64) and 44.3 (SD 9.22, range 23.5-73.3) respectively. The mean ASES score was 37.5 preoperatively (SD 18.0, range 5-99.5) and 77.5 postoperatively (SD 20.5, range 25.0-100.0). PROMIS-UE demonstrated a moderate correlation with ASES preoperatively and a strong correlation postoperatively (r = 0.52, confidence interval 0.27-0.60; r = 0.70, confidence interval 0.55-0.78, respectively). PROMIS-UE demonstrated a minor floor effect preoperatively (7.8%) but significant ceiling effect postoperatively (24.4%) and ASES demonstrated a mild ceiling effect at final follow-up (8.9%). There were otherwise no other floor or ceiling effects at all other time points across each survey.ConclusionPROMIS-UE correlates well with ASES at both baseline and 1-year postoperation for patients undergoing total shoulder replacement. In addition, the change seen between both baseline and 1 year outcome scores for both scoring systems also correlates strongly, suggesting that PROMIS-UE may be a suitable alternative to ASES for this patient population.     

Does the timing of shoulder manipulation under ultrasound-guided cervical nerve root block for frozen shoulder affect the clinical outcome?

BackgroundAlthough the clinical outcomes of manipulation under ultrasound-guided fifth and sixth cervical nerve root block for frozen shoulder have been reported, few studies have focused on the timing of manipulation. This study aimed to determine whether the timing of manipulation impacts the clinical outcomes.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 103 frozen shoulder patients (mean age 51.5 years) who underwent manipulation in one shoulder (n = 103 shoulders) between January 2012 and April 2019. Stiff shoulder was defined as limited range of motion in at least three directions, i.e., passive forward flexion of ≤100°, passive external rotation at the side of ≤10°, and internal rotation of ≤L5. The patients were categorized into two groups: those mobilized within 6 months after symptom onset (early group, 44 shoulders) and those mobilized >6 months after symptom onset (late group, 59 shoulders). The range of motion (forward flexion, external rotation, and internal rotation), Japanese Orthopaedic Association shoulder scores, Constant Shoulder Score, and University of California, Los Angeles scores before and 3, 6, and 12 months after manipulation were compared between groups.ResultsThe late group exhibited significant improvement in forward flexion, external rotation, internal rotation, Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores, Constant Shoulder Score, and University of California, Los Angeles scores at 3 months; forward flexion at 6 months; and forward flexion and University of California, Los Angeles scores at 12 months after manipulation compared to the early group.ConclusionsOur results indicate that timing has a significant influence on the outcome of manipulation for frozen shoulders. The optimal time for manipulation may be >6 months after symptom onset. These findings can be applied in counselling for frozen shoulder patients and for improved outcomes after manipulation.     

Clinical and radiographic results of eccentric glenoid reaming in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundOne option for treating glenoid bone loss in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is eccentric reaming of the glenoid, but the effect on clinical results is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between medialization of the bone-baseplate interface (herein, ‘medialization’) caused by eccentric reaming of the glenoid and scapular notching, baseplate loosening, and clinical outcomes after RSA.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed data for 91 patients who underwent primary RSA between January 2014 and December 2016 with a lateralized implant and a minimum 2-year follow-up. The amount of medialization was estimated using a 3-dimensional computed tomography scan-based computer planning software. The average amount of medialization estimated by the 3-dimensional planning software was 3.4 mm (range, 0.5-10 mm). Outcomes included range of motion (ROM), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and the rates of scapular notching and baseplate loosening. The association between the estimated medialization and the outcomes of interest was evaluated using multivariate models.ResultsAfter controlling for age, sex, diagnosis, subscapularis repair, glenosphere size, and baseline ROM, medialization was not associated with the postoperative abduction (P = .35), external rotation (ER) at 90° (P = .16), internal rotation at 90° (P = .08), and internal rotation at the back (P = .06). However, we found a significant association between medialization and postoperative ER at the side (P = .02). According to the multivariate model, for a 1-mm increase in medialization during surgery, a decrease of 1.6° in postoperative ER would be expected. We found no association between medialization and the postoperative ASES score (P = .48), SST score (P = .59), or VAS score (P = .27). At a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, we found no baseplate loosening or radiographic signs of baseplate loosening in any patient. Scapular notching of grades 1 to 2 was observed in 22 patients (24%). We were not able to detect a difference in scapular notching when medialization was > 1 mm ver when medialization ≤ 1 mm (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval: 0.28-23).ConclusionsIncreasing medialization due to eccentric reaming after RSA with a lateralized implant was associated with a decrease in postoperative ER at the side. However, increasing medialization was not associated with worse patient-reported outcome scores or increased baseplate loosening at short-term follow-up.     

Short-term clinical results of frozen shoulder treated with shoulder manipulation under ultrasound-guided cervical nerve root block at outpatient setting: A case series

Background

We evaluated the short-term clinical outcomes of frozen shoulder treatment via shoulder manipulation under ultrasound-guided cervical nerve root block (MUC).