Pulmonary homograft endocarditis after Ross procedure

We report the case of a 36-year-old patient who experienced an isolated acute pulmonary homograft endocarditis two years after a Ross procedure for aortic valve infective endocarditis.     

Medium-term results of aortic valve replacement with cryopreserved homograft valves: importance of a domestic homograft valve bank

There are advantages to using aortic homografts as aortic valve replacements (AVR), particularly in patients with complex infective endocarditis. To determine the importance of a domestic homograft valve bank, our 23 surgical cases of homograft-AVR were reviewed. Since 2000, the Tissue Bank of the National Cardiovascular Center has supplied 23 aortic homograft valves for the treatment of complex aortic valve endocarditis. Fourteen of 23 patients had prosthetic valve endocarditis and 20 patients had an aortic annular abscess. The early mortality rate was 17% (4 patients), in all of whom prosthetic valve replacement had been performed previously. No recurrent endocarditis and no recurrent aortic regurgitation were noted at medium-term follow-up. An aortic homograft valve is the conduit of choice in cases of infective endocarditis and the importance of a domestic homograft valve bank should be recognized.     

Aortic root replacement with free-style stentless valve for aorto-left and right ventricular communication due to infective endocarditis; report of a case

Aortic root abscess remains a major determinant of both early and late results of surgical treatment of endocarditis. This complication rarely progresses to intracardiac shunt followed by cardiac failure. We report a surgical case of a 40-year-old man, who had been diagnosed as prosthetic valve endocarditis with aortic root abscess ruptured into left and right ventricle creating aorto-left and right ventricular communication. Because of complete debridment of infective and/or dead tissue, aortic root replacement was required. We used free-style stentless valve, xenograft, since homograft was not available at the time of operation. We believe that this prosthesis has easier handling and is more resistant to infection, therefore, it might be an option for infective endocarditis with aortic root abscess.     

Treatment of aortic valve endocarditis with the Ross operation

Objective: Standard treatment of patients with infective endocarditis is radical debridement and valve replacement, in cases with advanced pathology the treatment is usually root replacement with either a composite graft or a homograft. Enthusiasm for the use of the Ross operation in non-infective aortic valve disease is increasing, but use of the pulmonary autograft in the treatment of aortic valve endocarditis has been limited. The objective of this prospective study is to present the technique and results of our experience with aortic valve endocarditis treated with the Ross operation. Materials and methods: Since 1992 we have treated 35 patients (median age 41 years, range 6–71 years) having aortic valve endocarditis with a Ross operation. Twenty-four patients had advanced disease defined as pathology due to endocarditis extending beyond the valve cusps (13 patients) or prosthetic valve endocarditis (11 patients). Twenty-two patients had active disease at the time of surgery, and 12 had undergone one to four previous heart operations. Results: There were two operative deaths (5.8%), both related to severe disease with very advanced pathology and heart failure. Intraoperative echocardiography demonstrated no or trivial autograft insufficiency in all patients. There have been no late deaths. There has been one (probable) recurrent right-sided endocarditis in a drug addict during a follow-up period of 3–56 months. One patient has been reoperated on for homograft stenosis. Conclusions: We are enthusiastic about the use of the Ross operation in aortic valve endocarditis and in younger patients with advanced pathology, it is our preferred treatment modality. Following removal of the autograft, unparalleled exposure of the left ventricular outflow tract is obtained. Even in patients with very advanced pathology the left ventricular outflow tract is usually intact, allowing autograft implantation in the standard fashion. For selected patients with simple endocarditis, the Ross operation is an attractive option on its usual merits.     

Homograft aortic root replacement to correct infective endocarditis requiring seven open cardiac procedures

Infective endocarditis, presumably from a septic dental focus, affecting the aortic valve was seen as acute aortic regurgitation in a 20-year-old woman. Seven open cardiac procedures for replacement of the aortic valve and left ventricular outflow tract were performed over the subsequent 6 years. Aortic root replacement using a fresh antibiotic-sterilized homograft was performed as the last definitive operative procedure. This article is presented to highlight (1) the use of homograft aortic root replacement for extensive involvement of aortic valve and left ventricular outflow tract in cases of infective endocarditis and (2) the feasibility of multiple sternal reentries when indicated.     

Active infective endocarditis of a bicuspid aortic valve causing left ventricular outflow tract pseudoaneurysm and right atrium shunt: A case report

Introduction and importanceLeft ventricular outflow tract pseudoaneurysm associated with infective endocarditis is a rare but life-threatening condition.Case presentationA 68-year-old man developed infective endocarditis of a bicuspid aortic valve with suspected annulus abscess and was transferred to our department for further treatment. Cardiac workup revealed the formation of a left ventricular outflow tract pseudoaneurysm penetrating the right atrium. We successfully treated the patient with pseudoaneurysm repair using a bovine pericardium patch in combination with aortic valve replacement. The patient was uneventfully discharged after 6-week antibiotic therapy and remained well for the following 2 years.Clinical discussionSurgery is the recommended treatment for left ventricular outflow tract pseudoaneurysms. Accurate diagnosis and identification of the anatomical conditions are crucial for determining the appropriate treatment.ConclusionWhen considering the appropriate surgical treatment for left ventricular outflow tract pseudoaneurysm associated with infective endocarditis, pseudoaneurysm repair using a bovine pericardial patch and concomitant aortic valve replacement can be an effective and feasible therapeutic option.     

Quadricuspid aortic valve complicated with infective endocarditis: report of a case

Congenital quadricuspid aortic valve is a rare cardiac malformation with an unknown risk of infective endocarditis. We report a case of quadricuspid aortic valve complicated with infective endocarditis. A 53-year-old Japanese woman was hospitalized with leg edema and a fever of unknown origin. Corynebacterium striatum was detected in the blood culture. Echocardiography demonstrated a quadricuspid aortic valve with vegetation and severe functional regurgitation. The condition was diagnosed as a quadricuspid aortic valve with infective endocarditis, for which surgery was performed. The quadricuspid aortic valve had three equal-sized cusps and one smaller cusp (type B according to Hurwitz classification). We dissected the vegetation and infectious focus and implanted a mechanical valve. Following the case report, we review the literature.     

Congenital aortic and truncal valve reconstruction using the Ozaki technique: Short-term clinical results

ObjectivesAortic valve reconstruction (AVRec) with neocuspidization or the Ozaki procedure with complete cusp replacement for aortic valve disease has excellent mid-term results in adults. Limited results of AVRec in pediatric patients have been reported. We report our early outcomes of the Ozaki procedure for congenital aortic and truncal valve disease.MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on all 57 patients with congenital aortic and truncal valve disease who had a 3-leaflet Ozaki procedure at a single institution from August 2015 to February 2019. Outcome measures included mortality, surgical or catheter-based reinterventions, and echocardiographic measurements.ResultsTwenty-four patients had aortic regurgitation (AR), 6 had aortic stenosis (AS), and 27 patients had AS/AR. Two patients had quadricuspid valves, 26 had tricuspid, 20 had bicuspid, and 9 had unicusp aortic valves. Four patients had truncus arteriosus. Thirty-four patients had previous aortic valve repairs and 5 had replacements. Preoperative echocardiography mean annular diameter was 20.90 ± 4.98 cm and peak gradient for patients with AS/AR was 53.62 ± 22.20 mm Hg. Autologous, Photofix, and CardioCel bovine pericardia were used in 20, 35, and 2 patients. Eight patients required aortic root enlargement and 20 had sinus enlargement. Fifty-one patients had concomitant procedures. Median intensive care unit and hospital length of stay were 1.87 and 6.38 days. There were no hospital mortalities or early conversions to valve replacement. At discharge, 98% of patients had mild or less regurgitation and peak aortic gradient was 16.9 ± 9.5 mm Hg. Two patients underwent aortic valve replacement. At median follow-up of 8.1 months, 96% and 91% of patients had less than moderate regurgitation and stenosis, respectively.ConclusionsThe AVRec procedure has acceptable short-term results and should be considered for valve reconstruction in pediatric patients with congenital aortic and truncal valve disease. Longer-term follow-up is necessary to determine the optimal patch material and late valve function and continued annular growth.     

Acute endocarditis treated with radical debridement and implantation of mechanical or stented bioprosthetic devices

BACKGROUND: Operation for active infective endocarditis carries high mortality and morbidity rates, especially when the annulus is involved. Overall the literature favors the use of autograft and homograft valves because of better resistance to infection. In our clinic during the last 5 years we used an aggressive surgical approach to infective endocarditis in combination with implantation of mechanical or stented bioprosthetic devices. METHODS: From 1994 to 1999, 50 adults with aortic and/or mitral valve endocarditis underwent valve replacement. The median age of the 36 men and 14 women was 58 years (range, 17 to 78 years). All patients had active endocarditis at the time of operation. Native valve endocarditis was present in 48 patients and prosthetic valve endocarditis was present in 2 patients. The aortic valve was affected in 24 patients, the mitral valve in 21 patients, and both the aortic and mitral valves in 5 patients. Two of the patients with mitral endocarditis also had infection of the tricuspid valve. Annular destruction was present in 24 patients (48%). The patients were treated with radical excision of all infected tissue. The annular defects were closed, if possible, with direct sutures. Otherwise, a reconstruction was performed. Follow-up was 100% complete with a median follow-up period of 45 months (range, 6 to 66 months). RESULTS: The procedures were performed without lethal bleeding complications. Early mortality was 12% and the actuarial survival at follow-up was 80%. In none of the patients who died was death related to the prosthetic valve or recurrence of the endocarditis. Only 1 patient (2%) developed recurrence of the infective endocarditis and was reoperated with a Ross procedure. Three and a half years later the patient developed severe valve insufficiency of the autograft and was operated again with implantation of a mechanical device. CONCLUSIONS: Native and prosthetic valve endocarditis can be treated successfully with aggressive surgical debridement and implantation of mechanical or stented bioprosthetic devices with a low risk of recurrent endocarditis.     

Infective endocarditis associated with a scorpion sting

We report the successful surgical intervention in two cases of aortic valve bacterial endocarditis after scorpion stings. Infective endocarditis developed in both patients several weeks after they suffered repeated scorpion stings. Both patients had similar, but uncommon features: (1) the isolated organisms were unusual causes of infective endocarditis (streptococcus group G and Streptococcus milleri), (2) annular abscesses developed that required either aortic root replacement with a homograft or annular patch repair with pericardium, and (3) complete heart block developed postoperatively, requiring permanent pacemaker implantation. Both patients completed a 6-week postoperative course of antibiotic therapy and are without recurrent infection.     

Bartonella haenselae infective endocarditis following transcatheter edge‐to‐edge mitral valve repair: A case report

Infective endocarditis following a Mitraclip procedure might be an under‐recognized complication. We describe the case of infective endocarditis by Bartonella henselae as a late complication in a patient with a previously implanted MitraClip system for mitral valve repair. Due to the severity of infection, surgical treatment was performed despite the high preoperative surgical risk, but recurrence of endocarditis of the biological valve implanted occurred. Although infection with Bartonella is known as a possible source of endocarditis, it has never been described before in relation to failed MitraClip therapy.     

Indications for and results of cryopreserved homograft valve replacement

The cryopreserved aortic homograft valve is one of the most reliable of the stentless biological prosthesis if implanted properly. Due to the limited availability of homograft valves in Japan, the indications for their use are different from those in other countries. The first indication is active infective endocarditis in the aortic valve position, especially infection surrounding artificial implants. Another indication is for reconstruction of the right ventricular outflow tract during pulmonary autografting. Finally, aortic valve replacement in young women of childbearing age who wish become pregnant is an accepted indication. Since 1992, cryopreserved homograft valves have been used in Japan, and the number of surgeries performed with them has gradually increased. While efforts have been made to expand the homograft bank system in some areas, the supply remains insufficient. Because the demand for homografts is high, it is extremely important to establish a nationwide tissue bank system as soon as possible.     

Aortic valve reconstruction using autologous pericardium (Ozaki procedure) for active infective endocarditis: a case report

Approximately one-third of patients with infective endocarditis require surgical treatment, but the ideal procedure that prevents infection ensures long durability and maintains quality of life remains unclear. A 21-year-old man who was diagnosed with aortic active infective endocarditis was referred to our hospital for surgical treatment. Echocardiography showed bicuspid aortic valve, severe aortic regurgitation, a large vegetation, and a paravalvular abscess. We planned to perform elective surgical treatment after antibiotic therapy; however, progression to heart failure required urgent operation. Aortic valve reconstruction (AVr) using autologous pericardium was performed. Perioperative and postoperative courses were uneventful. No recurrence of infection or adverse events were observed 4 years postoperatively. Considering prosthetic valve infection and redo operation, AVr may be considered among young patients.     

Severe cardiogenic shock due to acute onset of an aorto-to-right atrial shunt in a patient with aortic valve endocarditis

INTRODUCTION

Heart failure is the most common cause of death due to infective endocarditis. We report a case of a patient presenting with severe shock due to an infection-associated left-to-right cardiac shunt.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 62-year-old man, who underwent aortic valve replacement five years previously, was admitted to ICU due to acute hemodynamic deterioration. A few days earlier, he had a septic episode with blood cultures positive for Staphylococcus aureus and clinical features of infective endocarditis. In ICU, transthoracic echocardiography revealed shunting from the aortic root to the right atrium resulting in severe cardiogenic shock.

DISCUSSION

This case report describes a near fatal complication of infective endocarditis, detected by routine use of transthoracic echocardiography.

CONCLUSION

Our case outlines the relevance of early cardiac surgery strategies in patients with infective endocarditis and we briefly discuss the current literature.     

Homologous transplantation of the mitral valve: a review

Numerous experimental studies were conducted on homologous transplantation of the mitral valve either for mitral or tricuspid valve replacement in the early '60s. The first mitral homograft in humans was performed in 1965 by Senning. Since that time, there has been a limited number of implants mainly because of technical difficulties related to the insertion of the papillary muscles. Based on principles established for mitral valve repair, a reproducible method of homograft replacement of the mitral valve was described. Following validation in animals, the technique was applied in a series of 104 patients undergoing partial or complete mitral valve replacement. Significant improvements concerned: selection of indications and contraindications, staged approach according to the extent of the lesions leading either to partial or total replacement, systematic use of prosthetic ring annuloplasty, understanding of papillary muscle anatomy allowing a rationale for a reliable attachment method. In hospital mortality was 3.8%. At 8 years, the incidences of patients free from cardiac death and from all death were 90.6% and 82% respectively. Freedom from any cardiac event (death or reoperation) was 72% at 7 years. Similarly to the aortic homograft, mitral homograft durability was decreased in younger patients. Partial homograft replacementoffered satisfactory results particularly in the case of endocarditis and enhanced the possibilities of valve repair. The limitations of the technique are: the technical difficulty which does not permit a completely standardized operation, the risk of early valve dysfunction related to valve mismatch and the risk of late deterioration mainly leading to stenosis. Homologous transplantation of the mitral valve was also applied for tricuspid valve replacement in the case of infective endocarditis or for replacement of a degenerated bioprosthesis. Satisfactory results have been reported. However due to the lack of anatomical landmarks, the implantation procedure has remained technically challenging. Thus until further progress demonstrates a clear superiority of the mitral homograft, bioprosthesis remains the gold standard for replacing the mitral or the tricuspid valve with a biological substitute.     

Viable cryopreserved aortic homograft for aortic valve endocarditis and annular abscesses

Six consecutive patients with active aortic valve endocarditis, including 2 with extensive subannular aortic root abscess, were successfully treated with viable cryopreserved homograft aortic valve replacement. Two patients required extensive aortic root reconstruction with an appropriately trimmed aortic homograft to cover large abscess cavities. All patients showed resolution of infection with no perioperative mortality or clinically significant morbidity. Three patients had a minor degree of aortic insufficiency on postoperative echo-Doppler study. On follow-up at 6 to 48 months, all patients were in New York Heart Association functional class I. The resistance of the unstented homograft to infection makes it an attractive choice for patients requiring aortic valve replacement for active endocarditis. The results of surgical intervention in patients with extensive aortic root involvement may be further improved by the flexibility afforded by the homograft to be "custom-fit" to the abnormal aortic root and the ability to achieve secure abnormal aortic root and the ability to achieve secure valve fixation without use of prosthetic material.     

Replacing the ascending aorta and aortic valve for acute prosthetic valve endocarditis: is using prosthetic material contraindicated?

BACKGROUND: The use of prosthetic material (rather than a homograft) for ascending aorta/aortic valve replacement (Bentall procedure) in cases of acute prosthetic valve endocarditis is controversial. We report favorable results using this technique almost exclusively (a homograft was used in only 3 patients with hematological problems) during a 12-year interval. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients (55 +/- 14 years; 22 male) underwent a Bentall procedure for acute prosthetic valve endocarditis between 1988 and 2000. Twenty-five patients had undergone previous aortic valve replacement (1 with concomitant mitral valve replacement, 4 with coronary artery bypass grafting), and 3 had had a previous Bentall operation. The median interval between initial surgery and reoperation was 13 months (range, 1 to 106). Sixty-eight percent of operations were urgent or emergencies. Ninety-three percent of patients had significant aortic regurgitation; complete annuloaortic dehiscence occurred in 71%, and in 57%, an abscess was found. Causative organisms were identified in 25 of 28 patients: Staphylococcus epidermidis (9), Staphylococcus aureus (7), Streptococcus viridans (6), Pseudomonas (2), and Legionella (1). RESULTS: Twenty-three patients had mechanical and 5 had biological valves implanted during the Bentall procedure. Hypothermic circulatory arrest was used in 64%. Hospital mortality was 11%: there was one intraoperative death, and two before discharge (one cardiac, one sepsis). Eighty-nine percent survived without stroke. During follow-up (median, 44.5 months; complete in 92%), 1 patient died of recurrent endocarditis at 4 months. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that prosthetic root replacement may be superior to use of a homograft for acute aortic prosthetic valve endocarditis, with only a 4% incidence of recurrent endocarditis and reoperation.     

Aortic root replacement with a mechanical valve and prosthetic conduit for the complicated degeneration of the ascending aorta resulting from infective endocarditis.

A 28-year-old man with infective endocarditis of the aortic valve underwent a course of antibiotic therapy, but developed severe aortic root deformity requiring aortic root replacement with a mechanical composite valve conduit. Of note, this patient had undergone a previous aortic valve operation for bicuspid valve stenosis, and indurations and fragility of the aortic root caused by the preceding operation may have contributed to subsequent aortic root deformity during the course of infective endocarditis of the aortic valve. Over the 7-year follow-up period, the patient showed no signs of recurrent infection or new cardiac events. For younger patients with endocarditis, the use of a mechanical valve and prosthetic conduit with sufficient surgical debridement and appropriate antibiotic therapy appears to be a safe and effective treatment strategy.     

Surgical management for active infective endocarditis: A single hospital 10 years experience

Objective  Surgical treatment of active infective endocarditis (IE) requires not only homodynamic repair, but also, special emphasis on the eradiation of the infection to prevent recurrence. This study was undertaken to examine the outcome of surgery for active infective endocarditis. Methods  One hundred sixty-four consecutive patients (pts) underwent valve surgery for active IE in Madani Heart Centre (Tabriz, Iran) from 1996 to 2006. Patients presenting with IE diagnosis (according to Duke Criteriaset) were eligible for study. Results  The mean age of patients was 36.3±16 years overall: 34.6±17.5 years for native valve endocarditis and 38.6±15.2 years for prosthetic valve endocarditis (p=0.169). Ninety one (55.5%) of patients were men. The infected valve was native in 112 (68.3%) of patients and prosthetic in 52 (31.7%). In 61 (37%) patients, no predisposing heart disease was found. The aortic valve was infected in 78 (47.6%), the mitral valve in 69 (42.1%), and multiple valves in 17 (10.3%) of patients. Active culture-positive endocarditis was present in 81 (49.4%) whereas 83 (50.6%) patients had culture-negative endocarditis. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common isolated microorganism. Ninety patients (54.8%) were in NYHA classe III and IV. Mechanical valves were implanted in 69 patients (42.1%) and bioprostheses in 95 (57.9%), including homograft in 19 (11.5%). There were 16 (9%) operative deaths, but there was only 1 death in patients that underwent aortic homograft replacement. Reoperation was required in 18 (10.9%) of cases. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, Staphylococcus aureus infection (p=0.008), prosthetic valve endocarditis (p=0.01), paravalvular abscess (p=0.001) and left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40% (p=0.04) were independent predictors of inhospital mortality. Conclusions  Surgery for infective endocarditis continues to be challenging and associated with high operative mortality and morbidity. Prosthetic valve endocarditis, impaired ventricular function, paravalvular abscess and Staphylococcus aureus infection adversely affect in-hospital mortality. Also we found that aortic valve replacement with an aortic homograft can be performed with acceptable in hospital mortality and provides satisfactory results.     

Surgical treatment of acute infective valvular endocarditis (18 years experience)

BACKGROUND: Infective endocarditis morbidity remains high: 3 to 8 cases per 100,000 of population. Antibiotic therapy is ineffective. Its surgical treatment experience is relatively limited. Aim: To share the surgical treatment experience of 855 patients with acute infective valvular endocarditis (AIVE) treated during 1982 to 2000 in the Institute of Cardiovascular Surgery AMS, Ukraine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 855 (75.4%) of 1128 hospitalized patients with AIVE were operated upon. Surgical interventions included removal of diseased tissues, heart chambers treatment with antiseptic solutions, wash out with normal saline solution, replacement or plastic procedure of valves. RESULTS: Heart abscesses were found in 132 (15.5%) patients. Hospital mortality was after aortic valve replacement 12.6%; mitral valve replacement 9.7%; plastic procedure on mitral valve 0%; aortic and mitral valve replacement 30%; tricuspid valve replacement 15.4%; and plastic procedure on tricuspid valve 6.1%. Recurrences of infective process occurred in 51 (6.0%) patients. Infections were observed more frequently in patients with heart abscesses: 10.6% versus 5.7% (p < 0.02). RESULTS: 716 (96.7%) patients were studied 2 to 194 (87.4+/-39.4) months postoperatively. Tenth year postoperative survival was 62.1+/-27.7% including hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: (1) AIVE has become one of the most frequent causes of acquired heart lesions in the postChernobyl nuclear power station catastrophe era. (2) Heart failure development in postoperative period is stipulated by the disease duration. (3) Presence of heart abscesses favors recurrence of development of infective endocarditis. (4) Postoperative antibiotic therapy for more than 3 weeks does not help in prevention of recurrences.