A phase I trial of weekly gemcitabine and concurrent radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer

This study investigated the maximum-tolerated dose of gemcitabine based on the frequency of dose-limiting toxicities of weekly gemcitabine treatment with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Fifteen patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer that was histologically confirmed as adenocarcinoma were enrolled in this phase I trial of weekly gemcitabine (150-350 mg x m(-2)) with concurrent radiotherapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions). Gemcitabine was administered weekly as an intravenous 30-min infusion before radiotherapy for 6 weeks. Three of six patients at the dose of 350 mg x m(-2) of gemicitabine demonstrated dose-limiting toxicities involving neutropenia/ leukocytopenia and elevated transaminase, while nine patients at doses of 150 mg x m(-2) and 250 mg x m(-2) did not demonstrate any sign of dose-limiting toxicity. Of all 15 enrolled patients, six patients (40.0%) showed a partial response. More than 50% reduction of serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level was observed in 13 (92.9%) of 14 patients who had pretreatment carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels of 100 U x ml(-1) or greater. The maximum-tolerated dose of weekly gemcitabine with concurrent radiotherapy was 250 mg x m(-2), and this regimen may have substantial antitumour activity for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. A phase II trial of weekly gemcitabine at the dose of 250 mg x m(-2) with concurrent radiation in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer is now underway.     

晚期胰腺癌全身化疗的疗效观察

背景与目的:晚期胰腺癌是恶性程度很高的肿瘤,全身化疗是其主要的治疗方法。本研究拟观察、比较三种不同化疗方案对晚期胰腺癌的客观疗效及其临床受益反应。方法:对我科2000年2月～2001年4月期间收治的经病理检查证实的74例晚期胰腺癌患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析,其中26例采用5-氟尿嘧啶、醛氢叶酸、顺铂方案治疗(A组);23例采用吉西他滨单药治疗(B组);25例采用吉西他滨联合5-氟尿嘧啶、醛氢叶酸方案治疗(C组)。采用Kaplan-Meier法分析患者生存期,Cox比例风险回归模型分析影响预后的因素。结果:A、B、C三组客观缓解率分别为7.7%、17.4%与24.0%,三组间无显著性差异(P=0.261,χ2检验);临床受益反应率分别为19.2%、47.8%与60.0%,B、C组优于A组,差异具有显著性(P<0.05,χ2检验)。A、B、C三组中位生存期分别为6.50个月(95%CI=5.00,7.99)、8.03个月(95%CI=6.72,9.35)、8.79个月(95%CI=7.31,10.26),B、C组长于A组,差异有显著性(Breslow=8.85,P=0.0119)。三组间血液学毒性和非血液学毒性发生率差异无显著性。结论:吉西他滨与5-氟尿嘧啶、醛氢叶酸联合作为一线方案治疗晚期胰腺癌有一定的客观缓解率,可改善患者的生活质量,患者耐受良好,值得进一步研究。     

Phase I trial of gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine is the most promising new agent currently being tested in pancreatic cancer. The present study was conducted to confirm the tolerability of a weekly schedule of gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 in Japanese patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS: The primary end-point was to evaluate the frequency of dose-limiting toxicity. Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 was administered over 30 min weekly in two schedules: gemcitabine x3 every 4 weeks (Schedule 1) and gemcitabine x7 followed by a week of rest and then gemcitabine x3 every 4 weeks thereafter (Schedule 2). At least three patients entered each schedule and three additional patients were treated in the presence of dose-limiting toxicity. RESULTS: Eleven chemo-naive patients with a good Karnofsky performance status of > or =80 points and distant metastasis were entered into this trial. In Schedule 1, no dose-limiting toxicity was observed in the three patients. In Schedule 2, the evaluation of dose-limiting toxicity was complete in six of the eight enrolled patients and two patients showed dose-limiting toxicity in this Schedule; one patient experienced both grade 4 leukocytopenia and grade 4 neutropenia, and both grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 GOT/GPT increased in another patient. Two patients (18%) showed a partial response and a clinical benefit response was also achieved in two (29%) of the seven evaluable patients. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 weekly x7 followed by a week of rest and weekly x3 every 4 weeks thereafter may be tolerated in Japanese patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.     

Phase III study of gemcitabine in combination with fluorouracil versus gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial E2297.

PURPOSE: Gemcitabine is generally considered to constitute first-line therapy for pancreatic cancer. To determine whether the addition of fluorouracil (5-FU) improves on the results from single-agent gemcitabine, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) compared gemcitabine plus bolus 5-FU with gemcitabine alone for patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This trial involved patients with biopsy-proven, advanced carcinoma of the pancreas not amenable to surgical resection. Patients were randomized to receive either gemcitabine alone (1,000 mg/m(2)/wk) weekly for 3 weeks of every 4 or to receive gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)/wk) followed by 5-FU (600 mg/m(2)/wk) weekly on the same schedule. The primary end point of the trial was survival, with secondary end points of time to progression and response rate. RESULTS: Of 327 patients enrolled over 18 months, 322 were eligible. Overall, the median survival was 5.4 months for gemcitabine alone and 6.7 months for gemcitabine plus 5-FU (P =.09). Progression-free survival for gemcitabine alone was 2.2 months, compared with 3.4 months for gemcitabine plus 5-FU (P =.022). Objective responses were uncommon and were observed in only 5.6% of patients treated with gemcitabine and 6.9% of patients treated with gemcitabine plus 5-FU. Most toxicities were hematologic or gastrointestinal; no significant differences were noted between the two treatment arms. CONCLUSION: 5-FU, administered in conjunction with gemcitabine, did not improve the median survival of patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma compared with single-agent gemcitabine. Further studies with other combinations of gemcitabine and 5-FU are not compelling, and clinical trial resources should address other combinations and novel agents.     

Phase I-II study of gemcitabine and fluorouracil as a continuous infusion in patients with pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities, and efficacy of gemcitabine combined with fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable, locally advanced, nonresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer were candidates for the study. 5-FU was given via protracted venous infusion (PVI) at a fixed dosage of 200 mg/m2/d, and gemcitabine was administered weekly for 3 consecutive weeks every 4 weeks. The initial dose of gemcitabine was 700 mg/m2 and was escalated in increments of 100 mg/m2/wk until the appearance of severe toxicity. Measurements of efficacy included the following: response rate; clinical benefit response, which is a composite measurement of pain, performance status, and weight loss; time to disease progression; and survival. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients received a total of 109 courses. Dose-limiting toxicity, which consisted of grade 4 neutropenia with fever (one patient) and grade 4 thrombocytopenia (one patient), was observed in two of three patients treated with 1,100 mg/m2/wk of gemcitabine. On the basis of these results, the MTD of gemcitabine with 5-FU via PVI on this schedule was 1,000 mg/m2. Sixteen patients developed grade 3-4 neutropenia, and three patients developed grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia. Grade 3-4 nonhematologic toxicity consisted of diarrhea (two patients) and cutaneous toxicity, asthenia, edema, mucositis, and nausea and vomiting (one patient each). The delivered dose-intensity of gemcitabine was similar at the 1,000 mg/m2 dose level (599 mg/m2/wk) as at the 900 mg/m2 (601 mg/m2/wk) dose level. For this reason, the recommended dose of gemcitabine for phase II evaluation on this schedule was 900 mg/m2. Five patients had objective responses (one complete response and four partial responses; response rate, 19.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.5 to 39.3), and 10 patients had improvement of disease-related symptoms (45%; 95% CI, 24 to 67). After a median follow-up of 17.7 months (range, 7.8 to 24.8 months), the median progression-free survival and overall survival times were 7.4 months (95% CI, 3.3 to 11.4) and 10.3 months (95% CI, 8.1 to 12.5), respectively. CONCLUSION: The MTD of gemcitabine when combined with 5-FU via PVI on this schedule was 1,000 mg/m2/ wk; however, on the basis of administered dose-intensity, the recommended dose for additional investigation is 900 mg/m2. This combination chemotherapy regimen was well tolerated and showed promising antitumor activity in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.     

A phase 2 trial of gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil, and radiation therapy in locally advanced nonmetastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma : cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 80003

BACKGROUND:

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of 5‐fluorouracil (5FU) and gemcitabine administered concurrently with radiation in patients with locally advanced, nonmetastatic pancreatic cancer.

METHODS:

Eligible patients had histologically confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma deemed locally unresectable without evidence of metastatic disease. In addition, all patients underwent laparoscopy or laparotomy before study entry to rule out peritoneal carcinomatosis. Patients received radiation therapy (50.4 Gy) with concurrent infusional 5FU (200 mg/m² 5 days/week) and weekly gemcitabine (200 mg/m²). After a 3‐week break, patients received weekly gemcitabine at 1000 mg/m² for 3 of 4 weeks, for 4 cycles. The primary endpoint of the trial was the proportion of patients surviving 9 months from study entry. Secondary endpoints included objective tumor response, CA19‐9 response, overall survival (OS) time to progression (TTP), and toxicity.

RESULTS:

Between November 2001 and October 2004, 81 patients were enrolled, 78 of whom were eligible for analysis. With a median follow‐up of 55.2 months, the median OS was 12.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.9‐14.9) and the median TTP was 10 months (95% CI, 6.4‐12.0). An objective tumor response was seen in 19 patients (25%), and among 56 patients with an elevated CA19‐9 at baseline, 29 (52%) had a sustained CA19‐9 response. Overall, 41% of patients had grade 3 or greater treatment‐related gastrointestinal adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS:

The combination of 5FU, gemcitabine, and radiation is well tolerated. Survival is comparable with the best results of other recent studies of 5FU and radiation or gemcitabine and radiation. Cancer 2011;. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Activity of raltitrexed and gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine has evolved as standard therapy in advanced pancreatic cancer since the demonstration of a significant clinical benefit. Phase II trials have shown that gemcitabine can be successfully combined with thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibitors such as continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). However, continuous-infusion 5-FU is inconvenient because of the need for a central venous access. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine in combination with raltitrexed (Tomudex), a novel and selective TS inhibitor that has the advantage of a 3-weekly treatment interval and manageable toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-na?ve patients with measurable advanced pancreatic cancer were treated with raltitrexed 3 mg/m(2) as a 15-min infusion on day 1 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, every 21 days. RESULTS: Twenty-five eligible patients (17 male, eight female) with metastatic (21 patients) or locally advanced (four patients) disease entered the study. The median number of courses per patient was four (range 1-14). One patient was not evaluable for response. There were three partial remissions [12%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.6% to 31.2%] and nine stable disease situations (36%; 95% CI 18.0% to 57.5%), while the tumours of 12 patients (48%; 95% CI 27.8% to 68.7%) showed progressive disease after three treatment cycles. WHO grade 3/4 toxicity was rare and symptomatic in only one patient, who experienced grade 4 diarrhoea and grade 3 nausea and vomiting. Symptomatic benefit was seen in 12 patients. Median survival was 185 days (95% CI 129-241) with six patients still alive. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of raltitrexed plus gemcitabine is limited, but compares well with other chemotherapy treatment options in advanced pancreatic cancer. However, this combination is convenient and symptomatic toxicity is rare. Thus, raltitrexed and gemcitabine should be investigated further in combination with drugs interfering with specific molecular targets.     

Cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor, in combination with gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer: a multicenter phase II Trial.

PURPOSE: To determine the response rate, time to disease progression, survival duration and rate, and toxicity with the combination of cetuximab and gemcitabine in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-expressing advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer who had never received chemotherapy for their advanced disease and had immunohistochemical evidence of EGFR expression were eligible for the multicenter phase II trial. Patients were treated with cetuximab at an initial dose of 400 mg/m(2), followed by 250 mg/m(2) weekly for 7 weeks. Gemcitabine was administered at 1,000 mg/m(2) for 7 weeks, followed by 1 week of rest. In subsequent cycles, cetuximab was administered weekly, and gemcitabine was administered weekly for 3 weeks every 4 weeks. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were screened for EGFR expression, 58 patients (95%) had at least 1+ staining, and 41 were enrolled onto the trial. Five patients (12.2%) achieved a partial response, and 26 (63.4%) had stable disease. The median time to disease progression was 3.8 months, and the median overall survival duration was 7.1 months. One-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 12% and 31.7%, respectively. The most frequently reported grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (39.0%), asthenia (22.0%), abdominal pain (22.0%), and thrombocytopenia (17.1%). CONCLUSION: Cetuximab in combination with gemcitabine showed promising activity against advanced pancreatic cancer. Further clinical investigation is warranted.     

Phase II study of gemcitabine in combination with docetaxel in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma (E1298). A trial of the eastern cooperative oncology group

BACKGROUND: Responses have been observed in several studies of docetaxel as treatment for advanced pancreatic carcinoma. This trial was designed to determine if the addition of docetaxel to gemcitabine therapy produced responses in >/=25% of patients with chemonaive advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This trial involved patients with biopsy-proven, advanced carcinoma of the pancreas not amenable to surgical resection. Patients received docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) i.v. over 1 h followed by gemcitabine 2,000 mg/m(2) biweekly until progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint of the trial was to determine the objective response rate with secondary endpoints of progression-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: Out of the 32 eligible patients, 2 patients had a complete response and 2 patients had a partial response for an observed objective response rate of 12.5% (90% CI: 4.4, 26.4%). Median survival was 4.7 months. Most toxicities were hematologic, with 48% of patients experiencing grade 4 toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The confirmed complete response rate of 6% and partial response rate of 6% is encouraging, but the toxicity of this regimen appears significant. Based upon these results, this combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel is not worthy of further study. Different schedules and dosages may be more promising.     

An Updated Meta-analysis and System Review:is emcitabine+Fluoropyrimidine in Combination a Better herapy Versus Gemcitabine Alone for Advanced and Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer?

Background: Pancreatic cancer ranks fourth in deaths caused by cancers throughout the world. Gemcitabinechemotherapy is the primary method of treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer, and in asco2014, it is still firstlinechemotherapy. Howeve,r gemcitabine+fluorouracil regimens are also licensed and widely used worldwide.Clinical trials are the best way to evaluate drug efficacy. In this study, we performed a systematic reviewand a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess whether gemcitabine+fluoropyrimidinecombination therapy improves the prognosis of unresectable pancreatic cancer compared with gemcitabinetreatment alone. Materials and Methods: A quantitative up-to-date meta-analysis was undertaken to investigatethe efficacy of gemcitabine-based combination treatment compared with gemcitabine monotherapy for locallyadvanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Inclusion was limited to high-quality randomized clinical trials.Results: A total of 12 studies were included in the present analysis, with a total of 3,038 patients recruited.The studies were divided into three subgroups including 5-FU / CAP / S-1 combined with gemcitabine. For theprimary endpoint of overall survival (OS), gemcitabine-based combination therapy demonstrated significantlybetter outcome (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.81-0.95) than gemcitabine monotherapy. The analysis of progression freesurvival (PFS) also provided a significant result for the combined therapy in a total of 8 trials (2,130 patients)(HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.63-0.86). With subgroup analysis according to the method of dosing delivery, we foundthat in the injection group with 3 trials (889 patients), a negative result was found (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.77-1.12);while a positive result was observed in the oral group with 9 trials (2,149 patients) (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.80-0.95).Conclusions: Gemcitabine combination therapy provides a modest improvement of survival, but is associatedwith more toxicity compared with gemcitabine monotherapy.     

Treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer with a combination of gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil: a single center phase II study

AIM: To determine the activity and toxicity of a combination of weekly gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil bolus intravenously in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer were included in this phase II study. The schedule was gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 i.v.) and 5-fluorouracil (500 mg/m2 bolus i.v.) weekly for 3 weeks every month. RESULTS: Four patients (19%) achieved a partial response and three stable disease. A clinical benefit was obtained in 7 patients (33%). Median survival for all the patients was 6 months. The treatment was well tolerated and toxicity was mild. WHO grade 3 leukopenia occurred in 2 (9.5%) patients, grade 3 anemia in 4 (19%) patients, grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in 4 (19%) patients, grade 1 diarrhea in 1 (4.7%) patient and grade 1 mucositis in 3 (14.2%) patients. CONCLUSION: The weekly administration of gemcitabine combined with 5-fluorouracil bolus i.v. is an active and well-tolerated regimen in metastatic pancreatic cancer. However, its efficacy is relatively limited.     

3D radiotherapy can be safely combined with sandwich systemic gemcitabine chemotherapy in the management of pancreatic cancer: factors influencing outcome

PURPOSE: The aim of this Phase II study was to examine whether concurrent continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (CI 5FU) plus three-dimensional conformal planning radiotherapy sandwiched between gemcitabine chemotherapy is effective, tolerable, and safe in the management of pancreatic cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients were enrolled in two strata: (1) resected pancreatic cancer at high risk of local relapse (postsurgery arm, n = 22) or (2) inoperable pancreatic cancer in head or body without metastases (locally advanced arm, n = 41). Gemcitabine was given at 1,000 mg/m(2) weekly for 3 weeks followed by 1 week rest then 5-6 weeks of radiotherapy and concurrent CI 5FU (200 mg/m(2)/day). After 4 weeks' rest, gemcitabine treatment was reinitiated for 12 weeks. RESULTS: For the two arms combined, treatment-related Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were reported by 25 (39.7%) and 7 (11.1%) patients, respectively. No significant late renal or hepatic toxicity was observed. In the postsurgery arm (R1 54.5%), median time to progressive disease from surgery was 11.0 months, median time to failure of local control was 32.9 months, and median survival time was 15.6 months. The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 63.6% and 31.8%. No significant associations between outcome and mutations in K-ras or TP53 or microsatellite instability were identified. Post hoc investigation of cancer antigen 19-9 levels found baseline levels and increases postbaseline were associated with shorter survival (p = 0.0061 and p < 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This three-dimensional chemoradiotherapy regimen is safe and promising, with encouraging local control for a substantial proportion of patients, and merits testing in a randomized trial.     

Phase II study of radiotherapy combined with gemcitabine for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Gemcitabine has been reported to be a potent radiosensitiser in human pancreatic cell lines. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of radiotherapy combined with gemcitabine for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In all, 42 patients with pancreatic cancer that was unresectable but confined to the pancreatic region were treated with external-beam radiation (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions over 5.5 weeks) and weekly gemcitabine (250 mg m(-2), 30-min infusion). Maintenance gemcitabine (1000 mg m(-2) weekly x 3 every 4 weeks) was initiated 1 month after the completion of the chemoradiotherapy and continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Of the 42 patients, 38 (90%) completed the scheduled course of chemoradiotherapy. The major toxicity was leucopenia and anorexia. There was one death attributed to duodenal bleeding and sepsis. The median survival time was 9.5 months and the 1-year survival rate was 28%. The median progression-free survival time was 4.4 months. In 35 patients with documented disease progression at the time of analysis, 34 (97%) showed distant metastasis as the cause of the initial disease progression. The chemoradiotherapy used in this study has a moderate activity against locally advanced pancreatic cancer and an acceptable toxicity profile. Future investigations for treatment with more systemic effects are warranted.     

Comparative Study of Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin and Gemcitabine Plus Fluorouracil in the Treatment of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Objective To compare the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine plus cisplatin and gemcitabine plus fluorouracil in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods Sixty patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were randomly divided into a GP group (gemcitabine + cisplatin, 30 cases) and a GF group (gemcitabine + fluorouracil, 30 cases). All patients were treated with gemcitabine at a dose of 1,000mg/m² (diluted in 100ml saline solution over 30 min) once a week for 3 consecutive weeks. The GP Group was followed by 40mg cisplatin via intravenous drip on days 15,16,17. Group GF was followed by 500mg/m²5-Fu (diluted in 5% glucose-saline (GS) 500ml, intravenously, over 6 hr) every day for five subsequent days. Results In the GP group, eight cases (32.0%) were PR and MR, the median survival time was 8.7 months, the Clinical Beneficial Rate (CBR) was 57.7%, and the CA19-9 decreased by over 50% in 13 cases (48.1%). In the GF group, 11 cases (45.8%) were PR and MR, the survival time was 10.1 months, the CBR was 82.1%, and CA19-9 decreased by over 50% in 15 cases(53.6%). There was a significant difference in the CBR between the two groups (P<0.05). The main toxicities in both groups were leucopenia and thrombocytopenia with no significant difference. Conclusions The treatment given to either the GP or GF group is a feasible and well-tolerated chemotherapy regimen for treating advanced pancreatic cancer with improved therapeutic efficacy and few side effects. The median survival period is long and the CBR is high, especially with the GF regimen.     

Open-label trial on efficacy and security of treatment with gemcitabine and oral modulation with tegafur and levofolinic acid (GEMTG) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

Aim

Advanced pancreatic cancer has a bad prognosis, with a median overall survival (OS) no longer than 4–6 months. Since the end of last century, monotherapy with gemcitabine has remained the elective therapy, but new schedules are needed in order to improve these results. We aim to evaluate the efficacy of tegafur and levofolinic acid (LV) associated with gemcitabine, as well as its toxicity, progressionfree survival and OS in advanced pancreatic cancer.

Patients and methods

An open-label, multicentric, prospective, non-controlled trial was carried out on patients with advanced or disseminated pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine 1250 mg/m² was administered on the 1st and 8th days of the cycle, tegafur 750 mg/m²/day for 21 consecutive days and LV 25 mg/day continuously, every 28 days, with a maximum of six cycles. The primary variable was tumour overall response rate (ORR). Secondarily, time to progression (TTP), OS and scheme toxicity were determined.

Results

Forty patients were recruited; the male/female ratio was 30:10, with a mean age of 61 years. Forty percent had a Karnofsky index of 90% or 100%. Only 11 patients (27%) completed the six cycles of treatment, but more than 50% received three or more cycles. Dose intensity was 89.56% for gemcitabine and 87.36% for tegafur. Efficacy ORR was 22.5% (CI 95%, 6–37%). TTP was 3.87 months (CI 95%, 2.1–5.6), time to treatment failure was 2.97 months (CI 95%, 2.43–4.67) and OS 6.3 months (CI 95%, 4–7). The chemotherapeutic combination was well accepted; most haematologic and non-haematologic toxicities were grade 1 or 2. The most prevalent grade 3/4 toxicities were asthenia (30%), liver biochemistry disorders (25%), diarrhoea (15%) and stomatitis (12%).

Conclusions

The administration of gemcitabine, associated with oral tegafur and leucovorin, has activity against advanced pancreatic cancer, with an adequate toxicity profile.     

Phase II Study of Pemetrexed Plus Gemcitabine in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Background:Gemcitabine is the standard chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. The novel multitargeted antifolate pemetrexed (Alimta®) has also demonstrated activity in this disease. These two drugs are synergistic in vitro, and a phase I study has demonstrated activity of single-agent pemetrexed in pancreatic cancer. Aim:To evaluate pemetrexed plus gemcitabine in a multicenter phase II study in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Patients and methods:Chemonaive patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma, metastatic or locally advanced, not amenable to curative resection, received intravenous gemcitabine 1250 mg/m² over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8 and intravenous pemetrexed 500 mg/m² over 10 minutes on day 8 every 21 days. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. Patients were evaluated for time-to-event variables including overall survival, time-to progression, time-to-treatment failure, and duration of response. Patients who were symptomatic were evaluated weekly for clinical benefit response. CT scans were obtained every two cycles. Results:Forty-two patients were treated; 41 were evaluable for efficacy. Ninety-five percent of patients had metastatic disease. There were five partial responses (objective response rate 12%), and 44% of patients had stable disease. The 1-year survival rate was 32%; median survival was 6.6 months (95% CI 4.4, 9.9). Of 30 eligible patients, four (13%) had a clinical benefit response. Grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia (84%), febrile neutropenia (12%), and thrombocytopenia (33%). Non-hematologic toxicities were minimal. Conclusion:The combination of pemetrexed and gemcitabine is active in advanced pancreatic cancer, and has acceptable toxicity; a 1-year survival rate of 32% is encouraging. A phase III trial comparing pemetrexed plus gemcitabine with gemcitabine has completed accrual. 1 The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.     

Irinotecan plus gemcitabine results in no survival advantage compared with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer despite increased tumor response rate.

PURPOSE: This phase III, randomized, open-label, multicenter study compared the overall survival associated with irinotecan plus gemcitabine (IRINOGEM) versus gemcitabine monotherapy (GEM) in patients with chemotherapy-naive, locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: IRINOGEM patients received starting doses of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 and irinotecan 100 mg/m2 given weekly for 2 weeks every 3-week cycle. GEM patients received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 weekly for 7 of 8 weeks (induction) and then weekly for 3 of 4 weeks. The primary end point of the trial was survival. Secondary end points included tumor response, time to tumor progression (TTP), changes in CA 19-9, and safety. RESULTS: In each arm, 180 randomly assigned patients comprised the intent-to-treat population evaluated for efficacy; 173 IRINOGEM and 169 GEM patients were treated. Median survival times were 6.3 months for IRINOGEM (95% CI, 4.7 to 7.5 months) and 6.6 months for GEM (95% CI, 5.2 to 7.8 months; log-rank P =.789). Tumor response rates were 16.1% (95% CI, 11.1% to 22.3%) for IRINOGEM and 4.4% (95% CI, 1.9% to 8.6%) for GEM (chi2 P <.001). Median TTP was 3.5 months for IRINOGEM versus 3.0 months for GEM (log-rank P =.352). However, subset analyses in patients with locally advanced disease suggested a TTP advantage with IRINOGEM versus GEM (median, 7.7 v 3.9 months). CA 19-9 progression was positively correlated with tumor progression. The incidence of grade 3 diarrhea was higher in the IRINOGEM group but grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicities and quality-of-life outcomes were similar. CONCLUSION: IRINOGEM safely improved the tumor response rate compared with GEM but did not alter overall survival.     

Phase I trial of gemcitabine combined with radiation for the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Gemcitabine has modest activity in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer and is a potent radiosensitizer. We conducted a Phase I trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose of weekly gemcitabine delivered concurrently with radiation therapy for the treatment of locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head and to assess the treatment-related toxic effects associated with such a regimen. Eighteen patients with pathologically proven, locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head were enrolled in this study. Patients received seven weekly doses of gemcitabine with 3000 cGy of external beam radiation therapy delivered during the first 2 weeks of therapy. Six patients received gemcitabine at 350 mg/m(2)/week, nine at 400 mg/m(2)/week, and three at 500 mg/m(2)/week. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicity was observed in over half the patients treated. Nonhematological toxicities were significant and included fatigue, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, and dehydration. Forty-four % of the patients required admission to the hospital for management of nausea/vomiting and dehydration. The risk of hospitalization appeared to be dose-related; all of the three patients treated at 500 mg/m(2)/week required hospital admission during treatment. Seventeen patients were evaluated for response, and eight patients (47%) had evidence of a local anticancer effect. Four of these eight patients (24%) had a partial response to therapy. The median survival for the entire group was 6 months. The 1-year survival rate for patients with an objective response to therapy was 66%. The clinical responses observed in this group of patients suggest gemcitabine is a clinically relevant radiosensitizer in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. However, the toxic effects are significant, suggesting that until dose and scheduling issues are explored further, concomitant administration of gemcitabine and radiation therapy should still be considered investigational.     

Gemcitabine with a specific conformal 3D 5FU radiochemotherapy technique is safe and effective in the definitive management of locally advanced pancreatic cancer

The aim of this phase II study was to assess the feasibility and efficacy of a specific three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy technique with concurrent continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (CI 5FU) sandwiched between gemcitabine chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Patients with inoperable cancer in the pancreatic head or body without metastases were given gemcitabine at 1000 mg m(-2) weekly for 3 weeks followed by a 1-week rest and a 6-week period of radiotherapy and concurrent CI 5FU (200 mg m(-2) day(-1)). The defined target volume was treated to 54 Gy in 30 daily fractions of 1.8 Gy. After 4 weeks' rest, gemcitabine treatment was re-initiated for three cycles (days 1, 8, 15, q28). Forty-one patients were enrolled. At the end of radiotherapy, one patient (2.4%) had a complete response and four patients (9.6%) had a partial response; at the end of treatment, three patients (7.3%) had a complete response and two patients (4.9%) had a partial response. Median survival time was 11.7 months, median time to progression was 7.1 months, and median time to failure of local control was 11.9 months. The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 46.3 and 9.8%, respectively. Treatment-related grade 3 and 4 toxicities were reported by 16 (39.0%) and four (9.8%) patients, respectively. Sixteen out of 41 patients did not complete the planned treatment and nine due to disease progression. This approach to treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer is safe and promising, with good local control for a substantial proportion of patients, and merits testing in a randomised trial.