Expression of Muscle Segment Homeobox Genes in the Developing Myocardium

Msx1 and Msx2 are essential for the development of many organs. In the heart, they act redundantly in development of the cardiac cushions. Additionally, Msx2 is expressed in the developing conduction system. However, the exact expression of Msx1 has not been established. We show that Msx1 is expressed in the cardiac cushions, but not in the myocardium. In Msx2‐null mice, Msx1 is not ectopically expressed in the myocardium. The absence of myocardial defects in the Msx2 knock‐out can therefore not be attributed to a redundant action of Msx1 in the myocardium. Anat Rec, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

The Dlx5 and Dlx6 homeobox genes are essential for craniofacial,axial, and appendicular skeletal development

Dlx homeobox genes are mammalian homologs of the Drosophila Distal-less (Dll) gene. The Dlx/Dll gene family is of ancient origin and appears to play a role in appendage development in essentially all species in which it has been identified. In Drosophila, Dll is expressed in the distal portion of the developing appendages and is critical for the development of distal structures. In addition, human Dlx5 and Dlx6 homeobox genes have been identified as possible candidate genes for the autosomal dominant form of the split-hand/split-foot malformation (SHFM), a heterogeneous limb disorder characterized by missing central digits and claw-like distal extremities. Targeted inactivation of Dlx5 and Dlx6 genes in mice results in severe craniofacial, axial, and appendicular skeletal abnormalities, leading to perinatal lethality. For the first time, Dlx/Dll gene products are shown to be critical regulators of mammalian limb development, as combined loss-of-function mutations phenocopy SHFM. Furthermore, spatiotemporal-specific transgenic overexpression of Dlx5, in the apical ectodermal ridge of Dlx5/6 null mice can fully rescue Dlx/Dll function in limb outgrowth.     

Formation of extra digits in the interdigital spaces of the chick leg bud is not preceded by changes in the expression of the Msx and Hoxd genes

By in situ hybridization we studied the expression patterns of Msx and Hoxd genes during the late development of the chick leg autopodium (foot) and compared them to patterns during the experimental development of interdigital extra digits. Extra digits are induced in the third interdigital space after various experimental manipulations, such as transient isolation of the interdigit, or removal of the interdigital marginal ectoderm and mesoderm. Msx1 and Msx2 are normally expressed in the interdigital tissue programmed to die. Our experiment changes the fate of the interdigital tissue from cell death to chondrogenesis and provides a good model for studying Msx involvement in defining areas of programmed cell death. Among the proposed roles for Hoxd genes is their involvement in the specification of digit identity early in development. The induction of extra digits allows us to examine whether this new morphogenetic commitment of the interdigital tissue involves changes in the domains of expression of Hoxd genes. Our results show that extra digits develop without a previous modification of the normal pattern of expression of Msx or Hoxd genes. This observation does not support the correlation between the expression of Msx genes and programmed cell death and suggests a role for these genes in maintaining the interdigital tissue in an undifferentiated state. Our results show that an increased number of digits can be formed without modifications in the pattern of expression of the 5-located Hoxd genes and suggest the existence of latent or residual digit organization mechanisms past the time when digits are normally determined, independent of Hoxd gene expression.     

Osteogenic response of human adipose-derived stem cells to BMP-6, VEGF,and combined VEGF plus BMP-6 in vitro

Exogenous addition of three factors—mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs)—has proven to be more beneficial than delivery of any single factor for fracture repair in animal models. We studied the osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells (hADSCs) in the presence of VEGF, BMP-6, or VEGF plus BMP-6 to better understand their enhancement of osteoblastic differentiation of MSCs. The VEGF plus BMP-6 group demonstrated an additive effect on the enhancement of mineralization and expression of ALP and Msx2 genes. Unlike VEGF or BMP-6 alone, the combination of VEGF and BMP-6 significantly enhanced the expression of COL1A1, osterix, and Dlx5 genes. The data indicate that a cross-talk between VEGF and BMP-6 signaling pathways enhances osteogenic differentiation of hADSCs.     

Differential impact of MSX1 and MSX2 homeogenes on mouse maxillofacial skeleton

Craniofacial development involves a large number of genes involved in a complex time- and site-specific cascade of cellular crosstalk. Msx homeobox genes are expressed very early and have been implicated in multiple signaling processes. However, little is known about their role in postnatal growth and at adult stages. The aim of this study was to compare the patterns of expression of Msx1 and Msx2 during postnatal growth and homeostasis. We used transgenic mice with a knock-in for Msx1 or Msx2. Msx expression was analyzed on whole-mount experiments on heterozygous mice. The results were confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR on mandible and tibia samples. Steady-state levels of Msx2 mRNA were determined at 2 ages, at postnatal day 14 and after 3 months, corresponding to phases of growth and homeostasis, respectively. Consistent with previous findings, the expression profiles of Msx1 and Msx2 overlapped during embryonic development. By contrast, marked differences in the patterns of expression of these 2 genes were observed during the growth phase. Msx1 was found to be expressed in basal bone during postnatal growth. Msx1 was not expressed in alveolar bone, whereas Msx2 was strongly and continually expressed. Msx2 was present in all growth plate cartilages, as previously shown for Msx1. Autopods displayed different patterns of expression during the mouse life cycle, with continuous expression of Msx1 only. Interestingly, both secretory cells (osteoblasts) and cells involved in bone resorption (osteoclasts) were found to be involved in Msx molecular pathways, their precise involvement depending on the anatomical site. The observed patterns correspond to specific sites during growth and constitute landmarks in our understanding of growth-related oral facial dysmorphologies.     

远端同源异型盒2和叉头盒O3a在大鼠脑皮质发育过程中的分布与表达

目的 了目的 探讨远端同源异型盒2（Dlx2）和叉头盒O3a（FoxO3a）在SD大鼠脑皮质发育过程中的表达特点。 方法 应用Real-time PCR法检测Dlx2 mRNA和FoxO3a mRNA分别在受孕11d（E11）、E13、E15、E17、E19及生后1d（P1）的表达情况;应用免疫组织化学技术显示Dlx2和FoxO3a在E11、E13、E15、E17、E19及P1蛋白的表达情况。 结果 FoxO3a与Dlx2 mRNA在E11～P1均有表达,而FoxO3a mRNA表达高峰明显早于Dlx2 mRNA;Dlx2 mRNA表达在E15～E17时大幅度上升,而在此之后始终保持这一高水平的表达;Dlx2 mRNA与FoxO3a mRNA的表达在E15～P1呈现出一致的变化趋势;Dlx2基因在E19时出现mRNA水平的高表达而未见蛋白表达。 结论 Dlx2和FoxO3a基因在胚胎后期鼠脑皮质中均有表达,且其表达趋势具有一定的一致性;两基因的分布随皮质分层而改变。     

The zebrafish homeobox gene irxl1 is required for brain and pharyngeal arch morphogenesis

Iroquois homeobox‐like 1 (irxl1) is a novel member of the TALE superfamily of homeobox genes that is most closely related to the Iroquois class. We have identified the zebrafish irxl1 gene and characterized its structure. The protein contains a homeodomain that shares 100% sequence identity with other vertebrate orthologs. During embryogenesis, irxl1 is expressed from 18 hours postfertilization onward and prominent expression is detected in the pharyngeal arches. Knockdown of irxl1 by morpholinos results in malformed brain and arch structures, which can be partially rescued by cRNA injection. The heads of the morphants become small and flat, and extensions along the anterior–posterior/dorso–ventral axes are reduced without affecting regional specification. Loss of irxl1 function also causes deficit in neural crest cells which consequently results in partial loss of craniofacial muscles and severe deformation of arch cartilages. These observations suggest that irxl1 may regulate factors involved in brain and pharyngeal arch development. Developmental Dynamics 239:639–650, 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Dorsoventral patterning in the Drosophila central nervous system: the intermediate neuroblasts defective homeobox gene specifies intermediate column identity

One of the first steps in neurogenesis is the diversification of cells along the dorsoventral axis. In Drosophila the central nervous system develops from three longitudinal columns of cells: ventral cells that express the vnd/nk2 homeobox gene, intermediate cells, and dorsal cells that express the msh homeobox gene. Here we describe a new Drosophila homeobox gene, intermediate neuroblasts defective (ind), which is expressed specifically in the intermediate column cells. ind is essential for intermediate column development: Null mutants have a transformation of intermediate to dorsal column neuroectoderm fate, and only 10% of the intermediate column neuroblasts develop. The establishment of dorsoventral column identity involves negative regulation: Vnd represses ind in the ventral column, whereas ind represses msh in the intermediate column. Vertebrate genes closely related to vnd (Nkx2.1 and Nkx2.2), ind (Gsh1 and Gsh2), and msh (Msx1 and Msx3) are expressed in corresponding ventral, intermediate, and dorsal domains during vertebrate neurogenesis, raising the possibility that dorsoventral patterning within the central nervous system is evolutionarily conserved.     

Spatio‐temporal expression of HOX genes in human hindgut development

Background: Hox genes belong to a highly conserved subgroup of the homeobox gene superfamily. Studies of animal models have emphasized their role in defining the body plan by their coordinated expression along the body axis during ontogeny. Although an important role of HOX genes in human development is assumed, little is known about their expression during human ontogenesis. Therefore, we investigated the expression of the nine most posterior members of the HOXA, HOXB, HOXC, and HOXD clusters in embryonic hindgut between weeks 6 to 12 and in adult rectal tissue. Results: Applying in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry, we observed expression of HOXA11, HOXA13, HOXD12, and HOXD13 in developmental week 6. However, expression of HOXD12 faded during weeks 7 and 8, and then became increasingly re‐expressed during week 9 in humans. With the exception of HOXD13, all expressed HOX genes dropped below detection limits in week 11. Adult rectal tissue displayed distinct HOXA11, HOXA13, HOXD12, and HOXD13 expression patterns within the rectal layers. Conclusions: Our data suggest a strict spatio‐temporal regulation of HOX gene expression during human development, supporting the idea of their role as key regulators. Nonetheless, the expression pattern of distinct HOX genes differs markedly from animal models. Developmental Dynamics 242:53–66, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.