加速康复外科理念在腹腔镜精准肝切除术治疗肝血管瘤中的临床应用

目的:探讨加速康复外科(ERAS)理念在腹腔镜精准肝切除术治疗肝血管瘤中应用的安全性、可行性、有效性。方法:回顾性分析2014年1月—2019年1月期间96例因肝血管瘤接受腹腔镜下精准肝切除术患者的临床资料,其中40例采用ERAS理念行围手术期管理(ERAS组),56例按照传统方式行围手术期管理(对照组),比较两组患者术前一般资料、术中指标、术后住院时间、住院费用、术后并发症发生率、肝功能恢复情况、C-反应蛋白(CRP)等实验室检查。结果:两组患者在术前、术中各方面指标差异无统计学意义(均P0.05)。与对照组比较,ERAS组术后住院时间明显缩短、住院费用明显降低(均P0.05)。实验室指标方面,ERAS组术后7 d的CRP水平明显低于对照组(P0.05),两组间其余指标差异均无统计学意义(均P0.05)。两组术后各项并发症发生率及再入院率差异均无统计学意义(均P0.05)。结论:在腹腔镜精准肝切除术患者围手术期开展ERAS是安全及可行的,可以缩短患者住院时间、减少住院费用,减少术后应激反应,加快患者术后康复。     

快速康复外科在右半肝切除围手术期中的应用

目的 探讨快速康复外科（ERAS）模式应用于右半肝切除围手术期的临床价值。方法 分析2017年08月~2019年08月于我院进行右半肝切除术的53例患者临床资料,按围手术期的处理方法不同分为快速康复组（ERAS组）和传统对照组（对照组）。比较两组患者术前、术中的基本资料,及术后住院时间、肛门恢复排气时间、住院总费用、并发症、术后恢复质量（15项恢复质量评分量表,QoR-15）及C反应蛋白（CRP）等方面,评价其临床价值。结果 两组患者术前基本资料无统计学意义,具有可比性（P>0.05）;在手术时间、术中出血量方面两组比较无统计学差异（P>0.05）;两组患者在术后肛门恢复排气时间、住院时间、住院总费用、并发症方面比较差异有统计学意义（P均<0.05）;ERAS组在术后恢复质量评分高于对照组（P<0.05）,而在CRP方面ERAS组数值低于后者（P<0.05）。结论 在右半肝切除的围手术期应用加速康复外科模式能够有效地缩短住院时间,降低住院费用、术后并发症及术后创伤应激反应,从而促进患者的快速康复。     

快速康复理念在肝癌肝切除术围手术期处理中的应用

目的：评估快速康复外科（FTS）理念应用于肝癌切除术患者围手术期的优越性。方法：297例肝细胞性肝癌患者被随机分为FTS组（135例）和对照组（162例）,FTS组采用FTS理念指导下的围手术期处理措施,对照组采用传统围手术期处理措施,比较分析两组患者术中情况,术后肠道功能恢复时间、术后住院天数、住院费用、术后不良反应及并发症情况。结果：与对照组比较,FTS组手术时间明显缩短,术后肠道功能恢复时间明显提前,术后住院天数缩短,住院费用降低;差异均有统计学意义（均P<0.05）。并发症情况两组无统计学意义（均P>0.05）。结论：FTS理念应用于肝癌切除术患者围手术期的处理安全有效的,可加速患者的康复进程。     

Major Hepatectomy in Children: Approaching Blood Transfusion-free

Introduction Major hepatectomy complicated with massive blood loss requires blood transfusion, which may result in increased morbidity and mortality. Intraoperative techniques and postoperative management that achieves blood transfusion-free major hepatectomy in children are described. Methods Fourteen children with a mean age of 3.1 years and mean body weight of 14 kg underwent major hepatectomy between May 1994 and September 2002. Demographic information, surgical techniques, and intraoperative management were analyzed. Results Hepatectomy included right trisegmentectomy in seven cases, extended right lobectomy in three, right lobectomy in two, and left lobectomy in two. Preoperative imaging, hemihepatic inflow control, intraoperative ultrasonography, and ultrasonic dissection were routinely applied. Fluid was restricted to target a low central venous pressure (5 cm H₂O) during transection. Postoperative low hemoglobin (>6.3 g/dl) was tolerated in pediatric patients. There was no operative mortality or major complications and only two cases of pleural effusion. The mean blood loss was 68 ml (range 1.25–13.0 ml/kg), and no blood transfusions were required intraoperatively. Blood transfusion was given because of a liberal strategy for major operation in two patients and preoperative tumor bleeding in one. Conclusions Despite being technically challenging, major hepatectomy can be performed with minimal blood loss and without blood transfusion in children to decrease postoperative complications.     

加速康复外科理念在原发性肝癌肝切除术围手术期管理的应用价值

目的:探讨加速康复外科理念(ERAS)在原发性肝癌肝切除术围手术期应用的优越性。方法:将2015年7月—2016年6月收治的81例原发性肝癌肝切除术患者按照随机数字表法分成ERAS组(n=40)和对照组(n=41),ERAS组采用ERAS理念进行围手术期处理,对照组采用传统围手术期处理,比较两组患者的相关临床指标。结果:两组患者术前一般资料无明显差异(均P0.05)。两组患者的手术方式、手术时间、术中出血量、术后并发症情况均无明显差异(均P0.05),但ERAS组术后肛门排气排便时间、术后NRS评分、术后引流管拔除时间、术后住院时间均明显优于对照组(均P0.05)。所有患者术后随访1~2个月,无出院30 d内再次住院或手术病例。结论:ERAS理念应用于肝癌肝切除术患者围手术期的管理安全有效,能加快患者术后恢复。     

精准肝切除治疗原发性肝癌的效果分析

目的探讨精准肝切除技术在原发性肝癌切除中的应用价值。方法回顾性分析我院2011年1月至2012年6月收治的75例原发性肝癌行肝切除患者的临床资料,其中精准肝切除42例(精准组),非规则性肝切除33例(常规组),比较两组术后和围手术期情况,包括术中失血量和输血量,术后谷丙转氨酶(ALT)、谷草转氨酶(AST)、总胆红素(TBil)水平,术后恢复时间,并发症发生率,术后肿瘤标本切缘阳性率,术后1年复发率和生存率。结果两组患者均无围手术期死亡。精准组和常规组术中失血量分别为(612±435)ml和(1325±557)ml,两组比较差异有统计学意义(t=2.578,P0.05);术中输血量分别为(325±157)ml和(856±375)ml,两组比较差异有统计学意义(t=2.25,P0.05);术后第3天:ALT分别为(385±296)U/L和(442±403)U/L,两组比较差异无统计学意义(t=1.132,P0.05),AST分别为(132±115)U/L和(306±352)U/L,两组比较差异有统计学意义(t=2.41,P0.05),TBil分别为(28±12)mmol/L和(32±18)mmol/L,两组比较差异无统计学意义(t=0.233,P0.05);术后恢复时间分别为(9.3±3.5)d和(14.2±5.4)d,两组比较差异有统计学意义(t=2.15,P0.05)。肿瘤标本切缘阳性率分别为7.1%(3/42)和21.2%(7/33),两组间差异有统计学意义(P0.05);术后并发症发生率分别为9.5%(4/42)和27.3%(9/33),两组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05);术后1年肿瘤复发率分别为28.6%(12/42)和42.4%(14/33),术后1年生存率分别为88.1%(37/42)和78.8%(26/33),两组预后比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论肝癌患者在准确的术前评估后采用精准肝切除,手术创伤小,术中出血少,术后恢复快,具有较好的疗效。     

加速康复外科理念在肝切除术中的应用

目的:探讨加速康复外科(ERAS)理念在肝切除术围手术期中的应用效果。方法:选择2014年2月—2018年12月于阜阳市人民医院行肝切除术的97例患者,按随机序贯原则分为ERAS组(49例)和对照组(48例),ERAS组患者采用ERAS理念行围手术期管理,对照组则按照传统方式行围手术期管理。比较两组患者的相关临床指标。结果:两组患者的一般资料差异无统计学意义(均P0.05)。与对照组比较,ERAS组患者手术时间明显延长[(186.18±51.31)min vs.(157.00±66.53)min,P=0.02],但术中出血量与无输血率无统计学差异(均P0.05);术后拔管时间[(6.04±2.09)d vs.(8.44±2.97)d]、肛门排气时间[(1.96±0.79)d vs.(2.52±1.26)d]及术后住院时间[(8.57±3.21)d vs.(11.54±4.82)d]均明显缩短(均P0.05);术后并发症发生率明显降低(20.4%vs. 60.4%,P=0.001)。结论:ERAS理念在肝切除术治疗肝脏疾病的围术期中应用安全、有效,并可以减少术后并发症的发生,促进患者术后恢复,值得临床应用推广。     

微波止血分离器在肝癌切除手术中的应用价值

目的分析微波止血分离器在不阻断入肝血流的肝癌切除术中的临床应用价值。方法回顾性分析2015年12月至2018年8月中山大学附属第三医院肝胆外科连续收治的126例肝细胞癌患者临床资料,其中男性111例,女性15例,年龄25-75岁。根据肝切除手术器械不同分为微波刀组(n=42)和超声刀组(n=84)。微波刀组使用微波止血分离器切除肝癌,超声刀组使用超声刀切除肝癌。比较两组术前基线资料、术中出血量、术后肝功能、术后并发症等。结果两组术前肿瘤直径、肿瘤数量、天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)、丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)等比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。微波刀组术中出血量为100.0(100.0,200.0)ml,低于超声刀组的300.0(100.0,400.0)ml,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。微波刀组术后第1天、第3天、第7天AST、ALT均低于超声刀组,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。微波刀组术后第1天、第3天白蛋白高于超声刀组,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。微波刀组术后并发症发生率为4.8%(2/42),低于超声刀组并发症发生率20.2%(17/84),差异有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论在合理掌握指征的情况下,肝细胞癌患者微波止血分离器切除肝癌组织术中出血量、术后并发症更少,肝功能损伤更轻。     

控制性低中心静脉压在原发性肝癌伴肝炎后肝硬化患者腹腔镜肝切除中的应用

背景与目的:在肝脏切除手术中采用控制性低中心静脉压(CLCVP)技术可有效减少肝断面出血,然而,低中心静脉压(CVP)所产生的相对低血压和潜在低灌注可能造成不良影响,这使其推广应用受到一定程度的限制。本研究探讨CLCVP技术在原发性肝癌伴肝炎后肝硬化患者腹腔镜肝切除手术中的应用效果和安全性。方法:回顾性分析2017年4月—2019年3月在安徽医科大学第一附属医院肝胆胰外科行全腹腔镜解剖性肝切除手术的44例原发性肝癌伴肝炎后肝硬化患者临床资料,所有患者均接受同一组医生手术,其中24例患者术中采用CLCVP技术(观察组),另外20例患者术中未采用CLCVP对照组(对照组),分析并比较两组术前、术中、术后的相关临床资料。结果:两组患者术前资料包括性别、年龄、BMI、Child分级、肝硬化程度、肝肾功能指标差异均无统计学意义(均P0.05)。两组手术均顺利完成,无围手术期死亡病例。观察组术中、术后均未见低CVP相关气栓、肝肾损伤等并发症。与对照组比较,观察组术中动脉收缩压、CVP明显降低,手术时间与肝门阻断时间明显缩短、术中出血和手术输血率明显降低,但术中乳酸指标明显升高(均P0.05)。两组的术后出血、感染、胸腔积液、胆汁漏的发生率以及肝肾功能指标、拔管时间、住院时间方面均无统计学差异(均P0.05),但观察组患者术后引流量多于对照组(P0.05);两组术后复发率亦无统计学差异(P0.05)。结论:在做好术前肝功能评估和术中密切观测患者灌注指标的前提下,CLCVP技术对肝炎后肝硬化患者腹腔镜肝切除手术是安全可靠的,虽然低CVP会使机体灌注减少,机体无氧代谢增强,乳酸含量增高,但对肝肾功能及肝癌的复发无明显影响,而且较低的CVP能够有效减少术中出血量和输血量,缩短手术时长和肝门阻断时间,降低长时间缺血缺氧对肝脏的打击。总之,在无严重心、肺、脑、肾基础疾病的肝炎后肝硬化患者腹腔镜肝切除手术中,CLCVP是一种值得推荐的控制肝断面出血技术。     

快速康复外科理念在腹腔镜小肝癌治疗中的应用

目的:探讨快速康复外科(ERAS)理念应用于腹腔镜小肝癌切除术患者围手术期的临床价值。方法:分析2016年1月—2017年12月50例腹腔镜小肝癌切除术患者的临床资料,其中24例围手术期采用ERAS方案(ERAS组),26例围手术期采用传统方案(对照组)。比较两组患者相关临床指标。结果:两组患者术前临床资料具有可比性。与对照组比较,ERAS组术中出血量、手术时间均无统计学差异(均P0.05),术后肛门排气时间与住院时间明显缩短、住院总费用明显减少、并发症发生率均明显降低(均P0.05);ERAS组术后1、3、5d的Qo R-15恢复质量评分与C反应蛋白水平均明显优于对照组(均P0.05)。结论:腹腔镜小肝癌切除术患者围手术期应用ERAS理念可以有效的减轻手术创伤应激、缩短住院时间、降低住院费用、减少手术并发症,从而加快患者的康复。     

解剖性肝切除治疗肝泡型包虫病临床价值研究

目的 探讨解剖性肝切除手术对肝泡型肝包虫病肝切除病人的临床应用价值。方法 回顾性分析2017年1月至2018年12月青海省人民医院行肝切除手术治疗的62例肝泡型包虫病病人的临床资料,按肝切除手术方法分为解剖性肝切除组（35例）和非解剖性肝切除组（27例）,分别比较两组病人术前基本资料、术中情况及术后临床指标。结果 两组病人在年龄、性别、包虫数量、包虫大小及术前肝功能指标差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）;而术中出血量、输血量、术后肝功能指标［天冬氨酸转氨酶（AST）、丙氨酸转氨酶（ALT）、总胆红素（TBIL）和直接胆红素（DBIL）］、并发症发生率及术后住院时间差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 解剖性肝切除技术同样适用于肝泡型包虫病病人的外科治疗,而且具有肝功能损伤小、并发症发生率低及术后住院时间短等优势。     

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Pringle Manoeuvre with Hemi-hepatic Vascular Inflow Occlusion in Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Cirrhosis

Background

The duration of hepatic vascular inflow occlusion and the amount of intraoperative blood loss have significant negative impacts on postoperative morbidity, mortality and long-term survival outcomes of patients who receive partial hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with cirrhosis.

Aim

This study aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes of partial hepatectomy for HCC superimposed on hepatitis B-related cirrhosis using two different occlusion techniques.

Methods

A randomized controlled trial was carried out to evaluate the impact of two different vascular inflow occlusion techniques. The postoperative short-term results were compared.

Results

During the study period, 252 patients received partial hepatectomy for HCC with cirrhosis. Of these patients, 120 were randomized equally into two groups: the Pringle manoeuvre group (n?=?60) and the hemi-hepatic vascular inflow occlusion group (n?=?60). The number of patients who had poor liver function on postoperative day 5 with ISLGS grade B or worse was 24 and 13, respectively (P?=?0.030). The postoperative complication rate was significantly higher in the Pringle manoeuvre group (40 versus 22 %, P?=?0.030). However, the Pringle manoeuvre group had significantly shorter operating time (116 versus 136 min, P?=?0.012) although there was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss between the two groups [200 ml (range 10–5,000 ml) versus 300 ml (range 100–1,000 ml); P?=?0.511]. There was no perioperative mortality.

Conclusions

The results indicated that for patients with HCC with cirrhosis, hemi-hepatic vascular inflow occlusion was a better inflow occlusion method than Pringle manoeuvre.     

精准肝切除治疗原发性肝癌的疗效评价

目的 初步探讨精准肝切除治疗原发性肝癌的疗效.方法 将2007年7月至2009年10月南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院103例原发性肝癌患者根据不同肝切除方式分为精准组(54例)和常规组(49例).比较两组患者的术中、术后和随访情况.计量资料采用t检验,方差不齐采用t'检验,计数资料采用Fisher确切概率法进行分析.结果 两组患者均无围手术期死亡.精准组和常规组术中失血量分别为(635±608)ml和(929±1044)ml,两组比较差异无统计学意义(t=1.722,P>0.05);术中输血量分别为(222±381)ml和(542±785)ml,两组比较筹异有统计学意义(t=2.590,P<0.05);术后AST分别为(158±121)U/L和(292±347)U/L,两组比较差异有统计学意义(t=2.558,P<0.05);肿瘤标本切缘阳性率分别为2%(1/54)和18%(9/49),两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后并发症发生率分别为7%(4/54)和24%(12/49),两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后1年肿瘤复发率分别为24%(8/33)和42%(20/48);术后1年生存率分别为85%(28/33)和77%(37/48),两组预后比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 肝癌患者在准确的术前评估后采用精准肝切除,手术打击较小,术后恢复更快,具有较好的疗效.     

Creatinine clearance of early detection of posttraumatic renal dysfunction

Acute renal failure develops insidiously in the presence of normal urine output and vital signs. A prospective study was carried out to find whether renal impairment can be detected in the immediate postoperative period and to determine the renal function test best predicting the development of renal dysfunction. Forty patients with multiple trauma who required more than 10 units of blood and had a systolic blood pressure less than 80 mmHg on admission were studied. Creatinine clearance (Ccr), free-water clearance (CH2O), fractional excretion of Na+, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), urine flow rate, and vital signs were measured and compared in seven patients who developed renal dysfunction within a week of trauma (Group 1) and 33 patients who maintained normal renal function (Group 2). In all Group 1 patients Ccr remained less than 25 ml/min and CH2O greater than -15 ml/h for 6 h following surgery. None of the Group 2 patients had Ccr less than 25 ml/min for longer than 4 h following surgery. However, CH2O values were greater than -15 ml/h in 15 of the 33 Group 2 patients during the first 24 postoperative hours. Ccr values less than 25 ml/min were present, despite normal urine flow rate and blood pressure, in patients who subsequently developed renal dysfunction. Patients who have Ccr values less than 25 ml/min within 6 h following trauma and surgery may develop renal dysfunction, and some of them may proceed to acute renal failure. CH2O was not as good a predictor of development of renal dysfunction as Ccr.     

Giant cavernous hemangioma of the liver: is tumor size a risk factor for hepatectomy?

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether hepatic giant cavernous hemangioma (GCH) tumor size is a risk factor for hepatectomy. Twenty patients with GCH of the liver were treated by hepatic resection. Eleven patients with maximum resected specimen tumor size of >10 cm (mean tumor size, 18.5 cm; group 1) were compared with the 9 patients with tumor size. <10 cm (mean tumor size, 8.6 cm; group 2). The incidence of major hepatectomy in group 1 was significantly higher than that in group 2 (P = 0.0241). Although there were no significant differences in preoperative liver function, or in fibrinogen or platelet counts between the two groups, the level of preoperative fibrin degradation product (FDP) in group 1 was significantly higher than that in group 2 (P = 0.0116). Mean intraoperative hemorrhage volume, blood transfusion volume, and operation time in group 1 vs group 2 were 7003 ml vs 1092 ml (P = 0.0251), 2927 ml vs 556 ml (P = 0.0169), and 431 min vs 216 min (P < 0.0001), respectively. The incidence of postoperative complications in group 1 (45.5%) was higher than that in group 2 (22.2%), although not significantly so. There was no operative mortality in either group. Tumor size significantly correlated with intraoperative blood loss, operation time, weight of resected liver, intraoperative blood transfusion volume, and preoperative FDP levels. GCH tumor size is a significant risk factor for hepatectomy mainly because of the massive intraoperative blood loss and blood transfusion associated with major hepatic resection. More careful preoperative management to decrease tumor size may increase the safety of surgery for GCH of the liver. Received for publication on Jan. 21, 1999; accepted on May 24, 1999     

精准肝切除在结直肠癌肝转移中的应用价值

目的 探讨精准肝切除在结直肠癌肝转移治疗中的应用价值.方法 回顾性分析2006年10月至2009年10月天津医科大学附属肿瘤医院收治的85例结直肠癌肝转移患者的临床资料.根据治疗方法分为常规组43例和精准组42例.常规组:术前常规检测评估肝肾功能,增强CT和B超检查评估肿瘤情况;根据术前检查结果行解剖性肝段切除.精准组:除常规组进行的各项检查外,还采用吲哚菁绿排泄试验评估肝脏储备功能;通过CT对肝动脉、肝静脉和门静脉进行三维重建,并测量肝脏体积及剩余肝脏体积;术中使用低中心静脉压;采用术中超声检查明确切除范围并保护好周围脉管结构,进行精确的解剖性肝段切除.观察比较两组患者术中、术后及预后的情况.计量资料采用t检验,计数资料采用x2检验.结果 两组患者均无围手术期死亡.常规组和精准组术中全肝血流阻断时间分别为(35±25)min和(64±39)min,出血量分别为(685±524)ml和(486±360)ml,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(t=4.116,-2.033,P＜0.05);术中输血量分别为(228±398)ml和(160±330)mJ,两组比较,差异无统计学意义(t=-0.861,P＞0.05).常规组和精准组患者术后第1天ALT分别为(672±284)U/L和(344±158)U/L,第7天ALT分别为(332±161)U/L和(125±93)U/L;住院时间分别为(18±10)d和(12±6)d;术后并发症发生率分别为26%(11/43)和7%(3/42),两组比较,差异有统计学意义(t=-6.541,-7.232,-3.915,x2=5.251,P＜0.05).常规组和精准组患者术后1年肝脏肿瘤复发率分别为37%(16/43)和21%(9/42);术后1年生存率分别为88%(38/43)和93%(39/42),两组患者预后比较,差异无统计学意义(x2=0.110,0.501,P＞0.05).结论 对于结直肠癌肝转移患者,精准肝切除较常规肝切除创伤小,恢复快,更加安全、有效.

Abstract：

Objective To evaluate precise hepatectomy for liver metastases of colorectal cancer. Methods The clinical data of 85 patients with liver metastases of colorectal cancer who were admitted to the Cancer Hospital of Tianjin Medical University from October 2006 to October 2009 were retrospectively analyzed. Forty-two patients received precise hepatectomy(precise group) and 43 received routine hepatectomy (routine group). Evaluation of the hepatic and renal functions and detection of the tumors' condition were done before carrying out anatomical liver resection for patients in the routine group. Hepatic functional reserve of patients in the precise group was detected by indocyanine green excretion test. Hepatic artery, hepatic vein and portal vein were three-dimensionally reconstructed according to the data of computed tomography. The liver volume and residual liver volume of the patients were calculated. Hepatic resection was guided by intra-operative ultrasound in the precise group. Periand postoperative conditions and the results of follow-up of patients in the two groups were compared. All data were analyzed using the t test or chi-square test. Results No perioperative mortality was observed in the two groups.Time of hepatic blood flow occlusion and blood loss were (35±25)minutes and (685 ± 524) ml in the routine group, and (64±39) minutes and (486±360) ml in the precise group, respectively, with a significant difference between the two groups(t=4.116,-2.033, P＜0.05). The volumes of blood transfusion of the routine group and the precise group were (228±398) ml and (160±330)ml, respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups (t=-0.861, P＞0.05). The postoperaive levels of alanine transaminase at day 1 and day 7 were (672±284)U/L and (332±161)U/L in the routine group, and (344±158)U/L and (125 ±93) U/L in the precise group, respectively, with a significant difference between the two groups (t=-6.541,-7.232,P＜0.05). The length of hospital stay and postoperative mobidity were (18±10)days and 26% (11/43) in the routine group, and (12±6)days and 7%(3/42) in the precise group, respectively, with a significant difference between the two groups (t=- 3.915, x2=5.251, P＜0.05). The 1-year tumor recurrence rate and 1-year survival rate were 37% (16/43) and 88% (38/43) in the routine group, and 21% (9/42) and 93% (39/42) in the precise group, with no significant difference between the two groups (x2= 0.110, 0. 501, P＞0.05). Conclusion Precise hepatectomy is superior to routine hepatectomy in aspect of minimal trauma, quick recovery, efficacy and safety.     

Living donor hepatectomy (LDH)--comparative study between two different anesthetic techniques

BACKGROUND: Living donor hepatectomy (LDH) is now widely used to meet the need for liver grafts due to the shortage of cadaveric livers. Donor safety and perioperative anesthetic management are our major concern. The aim of our study was to compare two anesthetic techniques for management of living donor hepatectomy. PATIENTS & METHODS: After ethical committee approval and informed written consent, 20 donors ASA I physical status undergoing hepatectomy for living-relative liver transplant were allocated randomly to one of two groups. Group A where anesthesia was induced with fentanyl 2 microg/kg and propofol 2-3 mg/kg(-1), and maintained with isoflurane 0.8-1.2% and fentanyl infusion 1-2mcg/kg(-1)/h(-1). In group B anesthesia was induced with sufentanyl 0.2mcg/kg(-1), and propofol 2-3mg/kg(-1), and maintained with propofol infusion 6-12 mg/kg(-1)/h(-1), and sufentanyl infusion 0.2-0.4mcg/kg(-1)/h(-1). Atracurium was the muscle relaxant for intubation and maintenance in both groups. RESULTS: There were no perioperative mortality in both groups, no significant statistical differences between both groups as regard demographic data, duration of surgery, duration of anesthesia, hospital stay, intraoperative hemodynamics, blood loss, liver function tests (PT, AST, & ALT) measured in the first, third, and seventh days postoperative. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our study demonstrated that both anesthetic techniques were well tolerated for living donor hepatectomy, with no blood transfusion required, with short and safe discharge from PACU and short hospital stay, but with significant laboratory changes reflecting transient impairment in metabolic liver function. These procedures have proven useful as an important alternative to the cadaveric liver transplantation. Both techniques can be used as fast tract technique for living donor hepatectomy.     

肝切除术前门静脉栓塞对围手术期影响的荟萃分析

目的：探讨肝切除术（有半肝、扩大半肝切除术）前应用门静脉栓塞（portal vein embolization,PVE）对病人围手术期的影响。方法：通过电子检索Pubmed、Medline数据库,对1986～2008年有关右半肝或扩大半肝切除术前行PVE病例的对照研究资料进行荟萃分析。结果：共纳入8篇文献．423例病人。荟萃分析结果显示．PVE手术组与单纯手术组比较,术前谷草转氨酶（AST）、总胆红素（TB）、凝血酶原时间（PT）、15min吲哚氰绿储留率（ICGR-15）及肿瘤最大直径两组间均无统计学差异（19〉0．05）;术中输血、肿瘤Rn切除及手术时间两组间均无统计学差异（P〉0．05）。PVE手术组术后感染的发生率显著降低（P=0．002）,但二者在术后出血、胆瘘、肾功能衰竭及术后住院时间的差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。结论：术前行PVE不能提高肝脏肿瘤的R0切除率,但能降低术后感染的发生率。     

肝下下腔静脉阻断与控制性低中心静脉压在复杂肝切除术中应用的比较

目的:比较肝下下腔静脉(IIVC)阻断与控制性低中心静脉压(CLCVP)技术在复杂肝切除术中应用的安全性及有效性。方法:回顾性分析2016年3月—2017年12月行复杂肝切除术的103例原发性肝癌患者临床资料,术中所有患者均采用Pringle法控制入肝血流,其中56例行IIVC阻断(IIVC阻断组),47例行CLCVP技术(CLCVP组)降低中心静脉压(CVP)。比较两组切肝过程中CVP的变化、切肝过程出血量、手术总出血量、术中尿量、输血率、术后并发症发生率、术后肝功能与肾功能变化。结果:两组患者一般资料差异无统计学意义(均P0.05)。与切肝前对比,两组患者在切肝过程中CVP均明显下降,但IIVC阻断组CVP较CLCVP降低更明显,且IIVC阻断组切肝过程中出血量、手术总出血量、术后第3天ALT和术后第3、7天TBIL均明显低于CLCVP组(均P0.05)。两组患者术中尿量、输血率及术后并发症发生率、肾功能情况差异无统计学意义(均P0.05)。结论:IIVC阻断联合Pringle法操作简单方便,相对于CLCVP技术,其对全身血流动力学影响较小,肝功能恢复更快,且更容易降低CVP,减少术中肝脏断面出血,有利于提高复杂肝切除术的安全性。     

Laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis: a feasibility and safety study in 29 patients

Background Hepatolithiasis is a prevalent disease in Southeast Asia. Heaptectomy was considered the best treatment for majority of cases. Laparoscopic hepatectomy is a new procedure for liver lesions that uses a minimal invasive approach. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis by comparing it with open hepatectomy. Methods From November 2002 to March 2006 a total of 30 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis in Sir Run Run Shaw Hosptial. Twenty-nine were included in this study (a converted case was excluded) and called the laparoscopic hepatectomy group (LH). During the same period 22 patients with hepatiolithiasis who met the inclusion criteria for laparoscopic hepatectomy were selected for open hepatectomy and called the open group (OH). All operations were performed by the authors. There was no significant difference in preoperative data between the two groups. Data were statistically compared. Results Compared with open hepatectomy, those who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy had a shorter postoperative hospital stay and fasting time, a lower postoperative serum aminotransferase level, and a higher postoperative serum albumin level. Stone clearance rate (intermediate rate, 89.7% vs. 86.4%; final rate, 100% vs. 96.5%), stone recurrence rate (0% vs. 4.5%), operating time, and intraoperative blood loss were similar for the two groups. Six complications occurred, two (6.8%) in LH and four (18.2%) in OH. There was no perioperative mortality in either group. Conclusion Laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis is feasible and safe in selected patients. This work was supported by the Foundation of Science and Technology, Department of Zhejiang Province, No. 2003C33055.