首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
IntroductionAdvances in perinatology have been associated with improved survival of very low birth weight (VLBW;<1500 g) infants. These children have an increased risk of future neurological and development handicaps. A set of quality indicators have been recommended for the neurodevelopment follow-up programs in this group of patients.AimTo analyze our neurodevelopment follow-up program according to these quality of care indicators in 5 post-discharge follow-up areas: general care; physical health; vision, hearing, speech and language; developmental and behaviour assesment; and psychosocial issues.Patients and methodsFifty-one VLWB patients born in 2000 who have completed our 6-year follow-up program have been retrospectively studied. The agreement between our program and the standard of quality is evaluated.ResultsA copy of a discharge summary of the patient's neonatal course is present in the medical record in 92% of the cases. The inclusion of clinical data and general medical aspects in the medical summary is heterogeneous. Somatometric evaluation for the first two years of age is always present in a filled-in graphic. The international classification of the retinopathy of the preterm (RDP) is used in 100% of the patients. An ophthalmologic examination for RDP is performed in 72% (37/51) of the infants before hospital discharge; of the other 28%, only in 6 patients the date of the outpatient examination is present. Specific evaluations and interventions are performed within the recommended period of time in most of the children with suspected or neurosensory handicaps. More than ninety per cent of the patients are referred to the neurodevelopment specialist and most of them go to the visit (90.2% between 9 and 15 months and 78.4% between 21 and 30 months). Recommendations for a psycho-educational assessment are followed in the extremely premature (BW<1000 g and/or 28 weeks of gestational age) children. The number of patients who follow the program decreases with time. Psychosocial evaluation does not usually appear in the medical records of the patients.ConclusionWe have a good adherence to most of the recommended indicators in our follow-up program. The evaluation of these indicators is a useful tool to analyze the quality of a developmental follow-up program and to improve it.  相似文献   

4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.

Objective

To describe the situations in which urine drug screening is used in a Paediatric Emergency Department (ED). An analysis is also made on its potential usefulness on whether it changes the patient management, and if the results are confirmed by using specific techniques.

Methodology

A retrospective study was conducted on patients under the age of 18 attended in the ED during 2014 and in whom urine drug screening was requested. Depending on the potential capacity of the screening result to change patient management, two groups were defined (potentially useful and not potentially useful).

Results

Urine drug screening was performed on a total of 161 patients. The screening was considered not to be potentially useful in 87 (54.0%). This was because the clinical history already explained the symptoms the patient had in 55 (34.1%) patients, in 29 (18.0%) because the patient was asymptomatic, and in 3 (1.9%) because the suspected drug was not detectable in the screening. The drug screening results changed the patient management in 5 (3.1%) cases. A toxic substance was detected in 44 (27.3%). Two out of the 44 that were positive (2.1%) were re-tested by specific techniques, and presence of the toxic substance was ruled out in both of them (false positives).

Conclusions

Most of the drug screening tests are not justified, and it is very infrequent that they change patient management. It is very rare that the results are confirmed using more specific methods. Urine drug screening tests should be restricted to particular cases and if the result has legal implications, or if the patient denies using the drug, it should be followed by a specific toxicological study to provide a conclusive result.  相似文献   

14.
15.
16.
17.
18.

Background

Chagas disease, caused by Trypanosoma cruzi (T. cruzi), is endemic in Latin-America and is emerging in Spain due to immigration. The vertical transmission rate is around 5%. A routine prenatal screening with serology of all pregnant women from endemic areas is recommended to identify infected newborns, allowing early treatment and cure.

Objective

The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of positive Chagas serology in a cohort of pregnant women from Latin-America and its vertical transmission.

Patients and methods

An observational, prospective, follow-up study was conducted on women with positive serology to T. cruzi, as well as their newborns, from January 2013 to April 2015. Congenital Chagas was ruled out using a PCR technique at birth and at 1 month, and with serology at 9-12 months old. A child was considered infected when PCR was positive, and uninfected when PCR was negative, and/or it had a negative serology.

Results

Screening was performed on 1244 pregnant women from Latin-America, and there were positive results in 40 (prevalence 3.2%, 95% CI: 2.4-4.4%), with 85% of them from Bolivia.There was only one infected newborn (rate of vertical transmission 2.8% (95% CI: 0-15%)), who had a positive PCR at birth. Relative studies enabled an 8-year-old sister with an asymptomatic disease to be diagnosed and treated. Both were treated successfully with benznidazole (later the PCR and serology were negative).

Conclusion

Screening during pregnancy in Latin-American women helped to detect those with Chagas disease. The rate of vertical transmission was 2.8%, in keeping with literature. Screening led to the detection and treatment of previously unidentified familial cases.  相似文献   

19.
20.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号