Comparison of perioperative complications following staged versus one-day anterior and posterior cervical decompression and fusion crossing the cervico-thoracic junction

IntroductionMultilevel cervical pathology may be treated via combined anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) followed by posterior spinal instrumented fusion (PSIF) crossing the cervico-thoracic junction.The purpose of the study was to compare perioperative complication rates following staged versus same day ACDF combined with PSIF crossing the cervico-thoracic junction.Material and methodsA retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing ACDF followed by PSIF crossing the cervico-thoracic junction at a single institution was performed.Patients underwent either same day (group A) or staged with one week interval surgeries (group B). The minimum follow-up was 12 months.ResultsThirty-five patients (14 females and 21 males) were analyzed. The average age was 60 years (37–82 years). There were 12 patients in group A and 23 in group B. Twenty-eight complications noted in 14 patients (40%) included: dysphagia in 13 (37%), dysphonia in 6 (17%), post-operative reintubation in 4 (11%), vocal cords paralysis, delirium, superficial incisional infection and cerebrospinal fluid leakage each in one case. Significant differences comparing group A vs. B were found in: the number of levels fused posteriorly (5 vs. 7; p = 0.002), total amount of intravenous fluids (3233 ml vs. 4683 ml; p = 0.03), length of hospital stay (10 vs. 18 days; p = 0.03) and transfusion of blood products (0 vs. 9 patients). Smoking and cervical myelopathy were the most important risk factors for perioperative complications regardless of the group.ConclusionsStaging anterior cervical decompression and fusion with posterior cervical instrumented fusion 1 week apart does not decrease the incidence of perioperative complications.     

Outcomes of single-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

Several studies have established the short-term safety and efficacy of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) as compared to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). However, few single-center comparative trials have been performed, and current studies do not contain large numbers of patients. We retrospectively reviewed all patients from a single military tertiary medical center between August 2008 to August 2012 who underwent single-level CDA or single-level ACDF and compared their clinical outcomes and complications. A total of 259 consecutive patients were included in the study, 171 patients in the CDA group with an average follow-up of 9.8 (±9.9) months and 88 patients in the ACDF group with an average follow-up of 11.8 (±9.6) months. Relief of pre-operative symptoms was 90.1% in the CDA group and 86.4% in the ACDF group with rates of return to full pre-operative activity of 93.0% and 88.6%, respectively. Patients who underwent CDA had a higher rate of persistent posterior neck pain (15.8% versus 12.5%), and patients who underwent ACDF were at risk for symptomatic pseudarthrosis at a rate of 3.4%. Reoperation rates were higher in the ACDF group (5.7% versus 3.5%). To our knowledge, this review is the largest, non-funded, comparison study between single-level CDA and single-level ACDF. This study demonstrates that CDA is a safe and reliable alternative to ACDF in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy resulting from spondylosis and acute disc herniation.     

Tantalum trabecular metal implants in anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion: 2-year prospective analysis

Anterior cervical decompression for two or more cervical spondylotic levels can be performed using either multiple anterior cervical discectomies and fusion or anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF). A variety of options for ACCF implants exist but to our knowledge, there is no clinical data for the use of tantalum trabecular metal implants (TTMI) for ACCF. A retrospective review was performed of prospectively collected data for ten patients undergoing ACCF with TTMI between 2011 and 2012. Radiological outcome was assessed by measuring the change in cervical (C) lordosis (fusion Cobb and C2–C7 Cobb), graft subsidence (anterior/posterior, determined by the subsidence of anterior/posterior body height of fused segments; cranial/caudal, determined by the cranial/caudal plate-to-disc distances) and rate of fusion using lateral cervical X-rays of patients at 0, 6, 12 and 24 months post-operatively. The Neck Disability Index (NDI) assessed clinical outcome pre-operatively and at 6, 12 and 24 months post-operatively. Cervical lordosis (Cobb angle of fused segment) was 5.2° (± 4.2°) at 0 months and 6.0° (± 5.7°) at 24 months post-operatively. Graft subsidence was observed to occur at 6 months post-operatively and continued throughout follow-up. Anterior, posterior and caudal subsidence occurred more in the first 12 months post-operatively than in the following 12 months (p < 0.05). Average pre-operative NDI was 45%. Average NDIs were 18%, 13% and 10% at 6, 12 and 24 months post-operatively, respectively. ACCF patients treated with TTMI demonstrated stable cervical lordosis over 2 years of follow-up and 100% fusion rates after 2 years. Measures of subsidence appeared to decrease with time. Patients experienced improved clinical outcomes over the 2-year period.     

Anterior cervical discectomy plus intervertebral polyetheretherketone cage fusion over three and four levels without plating is safe and effective long-term

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is an established treatment for single-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy, yet its stand-alone use for multi-level disease of the subaxial cervical spine remains controversial. We report a prospectively studied case series of 30 patients receiving polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage fusion over three and four cervical levels without anterior plating. Seven (23.3%) four-level procedures (all C3 to C7) were performed, the other 23 (76.7%) being three-level, with 19 (64.4%) at C4 to C7 and four (12.3%) at C3 to C6. Long-term follow-up of more than 2 years was available in 67% of patients. This cohort showed statistically significant improvements in visual analogue score for neck pain (p = 0.0006), arm pain (p = 0.0003) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association myelopathy score (p = 0.002). Fused segment heights increased by 0.6–1.1%. Adjacent segment disease requiring ACDF at C3–4 was seen in 6.7% of patients (one after trauma) at a mean follow-up of 62 months. Same segment recurrence requiring posterior decompression with instrumented fusion was found in 10% of patients at a mean follow-up of 49 months, only one of whom had radiological evidence of cage subsidence. The results suggest the procedure is safe and effective with potentially less morbidity than anterior plating, shorter inpatient stays than posterior approaches, acceptable same segment recurrence and lower than predicted adjacent segment disease rates.     

A new zero-profile,stand-alone Fidji cervical cage for the treatment of the single and multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease

To investigate the clinical and radiological results of the new zero-profile, stand-alone Fidji cervical cage to treat single- and multiple-level cervical DDD, and evaluate the safety and efficiency. Between October 2011 and July 2014, 72 consecutive patients (41 males and 31 females; mean age 50.9 years [range, 33–68 years]) with cervical DDD who underwent surgery and were followed for more than 2 years were enrolled in this study (mean 31.1 months, range 24–47 months). The study compared clinical outcomes, radiologic parameters and complication rates. The SF-36, VAS, NDI, and JOA scores of all patients were improved significantly after surgery at any time point. (all p < 0.05). The C2–C7 Cobb angle and the disc height index (DHI) of all patients were improved significantly after surgery at any time point (all p < 0.05). From 3 months after surgery to final follow-up the DHI showed a significant reduction comparing 1 week after surgery (all p < 0.05). The fusion rates were 91.7% (66/72) and the radiologic mean fusion time was 9.9 months. Radiological evidence of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) was observed in 4/41 patients (9.8%). Postoperative complications included epidural hematoma, hoarseness, dysphagia, axial neck pain, and subsidence. The zero-profile, stand-alone Fidji cervical cage for ACDF can be considered an effective, reliable and safe alternative procedure in the treatment of cervical DDD.     

A matched cohort comparison of cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: Evaluating perioperative outcomes

ObjectiveCervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is a recent alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in patients suffering cervical disc herniation and degeneration. To date, a systematic analysis of their comparative advantages and risks following elective surgery remains elusive.MethodsAdult patients undergoing elective CDA or ACDF were extracted from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database years 2011–2014. A total of 19,369 patients were matched 1:1 by age, sex, functional status, charlson comorbidity index, ASA classification, BMI classification, and number of vertebral levels operated on during surgery. This matching process led to a final sample of 588 subjects (294 CDA, 294 ACDF). Multivariable regression was performed for five outcome measures: operation time, early complications, reoperation rates, hospital length of stay (HLOS), and discharge destination. Mean differences (B), odds ratios (OR) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) are reported.ResultsCompared to ACDF, CDA was associated with decreased mean operation time (B = −18.78-min, 95% CI [−29.13, −8.42]; p < 0.001), decreased HLOS (B = −0.44-days [−0.77, −0.11]; p = 0.009), and increased likelihood of discharge to home (OR = 5.39 [1.14–25.43]; p = 0.033). No differences in reoperation rates and complications were found.ConclusionIn a matched cohort analysis, CDA performs comparably to ACDF and is associated with decreased operation time and HLOS, and increased likelihood of discharge to home, without differences in 30-day complications or reoperation rates. Future prospective studies are warranted.     

Risk factors for the development of adjacent segment disease following anterior cervical arthrodesis for degenerative cervical disease: Comparison between fusion methods

This study aimed to determine the risk factors for developing adjacent segment disease (ASDz) after anterior cervical arthrodesis for the treatment of degenerative cervical disease by analyzing patients treated with various fusion methods. We enrolled 242 patients who had undergone anterior cervical fusion for degenerative cervical disease, and had at least 5 years of follow-up. We evaluated the development of ASDz and the rate of revision surgery. To identify the risk factors for ASDz, the sagittal alignment, spinal canal diameter, range of motion of the cervical spine, number of fusion segments, and fusion methods were evaluated. The patients were divided into three groups according to the fusion method: Group A contained patients who had received autogenous bone graft only (53 patients), Group B contained patients who received autogenous bone graft and plate augmentation (62 patients), and Group C contained patients who underwent cage and plate augmentation (127 patients). ASDz occurred in 33 patients, of whom 19 required additional surgery. The risk of developing ASDz was significantly higher in male patients (p = 0.043), patients whose range of motion of the cervical spine was >30° (p = 0.027), and patients with spinal canal stenosis (p = 0.010). The rate of development of ASDz was not different depending on the number of fusion segments. The rate of development of ASDz was 41.5% in Group A, 9.6% in Group B, and 5.51% in Group C (p = 0.03). In patients who underwent anterior cervical arthrodesis for degenerative disease, the occurrence of ASDz was related to age, the cervical spine range of motion, and spinal canal stenosis. Additional plate augmentation for anterior cervical arthrodesis surgery can lower the rate of ASDz development.     

Impact of smoking on postoperative complications after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

The relationship between smoking and the risk of postoperative complications among anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) patients remains uncertain. We compared the postoperative complication rates following ACDF surgery among non-smokers, current smokers, and ever-smokers. Baseline and outcome data were obtained from the 2005- to 2014 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database for patients over the age of 18 who underwent non-emergent ACDF surgery. Information on current smoking and ever-smoking status was extracted. Outcomes included development of at least one complication, development of a major complication, in-hospital mortality, and length of stay. ACDF patients were either current smokers (7847, 30.3%) or not current smokers (18,022, 69.7%); 33.0% of all patients (n = 8542) had ever smoked. Current smoking status was not associated with increased odds of any one complication (P = 0.584) or any major complication (P = 0.138). In addition, using the number of pack-years as the primary independent variable, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the number of pack-years was not significantly associated with greater odds of developing any one complication (P = 0.276) or any major complication (P = 0.334). However, ever-smoker status did present significantly higher odds of any major complication (OR, 1.333; 95% CI 1.007–1.764; P = 0.044) than for non-smokers. These results suggest that any patient with a prior smoking history should be considered a higher risk surgical candidate when attempting ACDF.     

Postoperative dysphagia correlates with increased morbidity,mortality, and costs in anterior cervical fusion

Anterior cervical fusion (ACF) after discectomy and/or corpectomy is a common procedure with traditionally good patient outcomes. Though typically mild, postoperative dysphagia can result in significant patient morbidity. In this study, we examine the relationship between postoperative dysphagia and in-hospital outcomes, readmissions, and overall costs. The University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) database was utilized to perform a retrospective cohort study of all adults who underwent a principal procedure of ACF of the anterior column (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision [ICD-9] procedure code 81.02) between 2013 and 2015. Patients with a diagnosis of dysphagia (ICD-9 78720-78729) were compared to those without. Patient demographics, length of stay, in-hospital mortality, 30-day readmissions, and direct costs were recorded. A total of 49,300 patients who underwent ACF were identified. Mean age was 54.5 years and 50.2% were male. Dysphagia was documented in 3,137 patients (6.4%) during their hospital stay. Patients with dysphagia had an average 2.1 comorbidities, while patients without dysphagia had 1.5 (p < 0.01). Mean length of stay was 6.38 days in patients with dysphagia, and 2.13 days in those without (p < 0.01). In-hospital mortality was 0.10% in patients without dysphagia, and 0.61% in those with dysphagia (p < 0.01). Direct costs were $13,099 in patients without dysphagia, and $21,245 in those with dysphagia (p < 0.01). Thirty-day readmission rate was 2.9% in patients without dysphagia, and 5.3% in those with dysphagia (p = 0.01). In summary, dysphagia in patients who undergo ACF correlates with significantly increased length of stay, 30-day readmissions, and in-hospital mortality. Direct costs are similarly increased as a result.     

Application of a stand-alone anchored spacer in noncontiguous anterior cervical arthrodesis with radiologic analysis of the intermediate segment

The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical features of noncontiguous cervical degenerative disc disease (cDDD), investigate the efficacy and complications of a stand-alone anchored spacer (SAAS) for patients with noncontiguous cDDD, and present radiologic analysis of the intermediate segment (IS) after skip-level fusion. Nineteen consecutive patients with noncontiguous cDDD who underwent skip-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with SAAS from January 2010 to December 2012 were enrolled in this study. Clinical outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at 24 months postoperatively using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, Neck Disability Index, and Visual Analog Scale. Overall cervical alignment (OCA) of the cervical spine, and the range of motion (ROM), intervertebral disc height (IDH), disc signal intensity and disc protrusion of IS were measured and compared before and after surgery. Clinical outcomes significantly improved compared to preoperative scores. The OCA was corrected and maintained at 24 months postoperatively compared with preoperative values (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the ROM and IDH of the IS at each follow-up (p > 0.05). However, decreased signal intensity on T2-weighted MRI was evidenced in three mobile IS at final follow-up (20.0%). Skip-level ACDF with SAAS may be an efficacious option for the treatment of noncontiguous cDDD.     

Survivorship and clinical outcomes after multi-level anterior lumbar reconstruction with stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion or hybrid construct

In multilevel disc disease, there is still uncertainty regarding whether multiple total disc replacement is more effective and safer than fusion. Our objective was to measure and compare the clinical outcome of multilevel hybrid constructs with stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) using a retrospective analysis. Sixty-four patients with chronic low back pain determined to be from two or three-level degenerative disc disease were included. Thirty-three patients were treated with hybrid fusion and 31 with ALIF. Several parameters were retrospectively reviewed, including blood loss, operation time, hospital stay, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and survivorship without the need for revision surgery. Telephone follow-ups were conducted to ascertain survivorship, clinical outcomes (VAS, ODI) and patient satisfaction. Operation time was longer in the hybrid group (p = 0.021). The hybrid group showed a significant improvement in VAS and ODI with 52.2% and 50.0% improvement versus 28.3% and 25.5% in the ALIF group (p < 0.05). At the telephone follow-up for patient satisfaction, 95.7% (n = 22) of the hybrid group were satisfied and 95.2% (n = 21) of the ALIF group were satisfied. Seventy-four percent (n = 17) in the hybrid group and 85.7% (n = 18) in the ALIF group would choose to do the initial surgery again. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed 80.5% survivorship for hybrids and 75.9% for ALIF at 5 years. With our clinical outcomes in VAS and ODI scores, these results, when taken together, indicate that hybrid fusion is a valid and viable alternative to ALIF fusion, with at least equal if not better clinical outcomes in terms of survivorship, back pain, and disability scores.     

Outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A meta-analysis

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) performed as an outpatient has become increasingly common for treating cervical spine pathology, largely due to its cost savings compared with inpatient ACDF. Nearly all outpatient ACDF patient reports have originated from single-center studies, with the procedure yet to be addressed via a meta-analysis of the peer-reviewed literature. The Entrez gateway of the PubMed database was used to conduct a comprehensive literature search for articles published in English up to 3/9/16. Data from studies meeting inclusion criteria (minimum of 25 patients, control group of inpatient ACDF patients, non-duplicative data source) was then categorized and assimilated for analysis. Seven studies met inclusion criteria, encompassing a 21-year timespan. Each provided Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine Level 3 evidence. The studies yielded a total of 2448 outpatient ACDF patients; only 125 (5.1%) originated from studies published prior to 2011. Single-level surgery occurred in 63.8% of patients, with 0.5% extending beyond two-level fusions. The overall complication rate was 1.8% (mean follow-up of 141.2 days); only 2% of patients required readmission. In conclusion, outpatient ACDF has become increasingly popular, with more than 95% of patients represented by studies published since 2011. Nearly two-thirds of outpatient ACDFs underwent single-level fusion, with virtually none undergoing 3+ level ACDF. Outpatient ACDF is safe, with a low readmission rate and complication rates comparable to those (2–5%) associated with inpatient ACDF. These findings support an argument for increasing ACDFs performed on an outpatient basis in appropriately selected patients.     

A meta-analysis of cervical arthroplasty compared to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for single-level cervical disc disease

There is no consensus on whether anterior cervical arthroplasty or anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is the optimal treatment for single-level cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare the safety and efficacy of anterior cervical arthroplasty with ACDF. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall, there were significant differences between these two treatment approaches in the arm visual analog scale (VAS) scores [mean difference (MD) = ?4.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) = ?6.42 to ?3.30], neck VAS scores (MD = ?7.90, 95% CI = ?10.36 to ?5.44), overall success rate [odds ratio (OR) = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.43 to 2.36], neurological success rate (OR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.20 to 2.55), and incidence of reoperation [risk ratio (RR) = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.26 to 0.97]. However, there were no significant differences in the neck disability index (NDI) scores (MD = ?3.81, 95% CI = ?8.12 to 0.51), number of adverse events (RR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.48 to 1.23), or radiological success rate (OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.36 to 2.09). Based on this meta-analysis, cervical arthroplasty is a safe and effective surgical procedure for treating single-level cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy.     

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: National trends in the treatment and peri-operative outcomes over 10 years

BackgroundRecent studies show increases in cervical spine surgery prevalence and cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) diagnoses in the US. However, few studies have examined outcomes for CSM surgical management, particularly on a nationwide scale.ObjectiveEvaluate national trends from 2001 to 2010 for CSM patient surgical approach, postoperative outcomes, and hospital characteristics.MethodsA retrospective nationwide database analysis provided by the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) including CSM patients aged 25+ who underwent anterior and/or posterior cervical fusion or laminoplasty from 2001 to 2010. Patients with fractures, 9+ levels fused, or any cancer were excluded. Measures included demographics, hospital data, and procedure-related complications. Yearly trends were analyzed using linear regression modeling.Results54,348 discharge cases were identified. ACDF, posterior only, and combined anterior/posterior approach volumes significantly increased from 2001 to 2010 (98.62%, 303.07%, and 576.19%; respectively, p < 0.05). However, laminoplasty volume remained unchanged (p > 0.05). Total charges for ACDF, posterior only, combined anterior/posterior, and laminoplasty approaches all significantly increased (138.72%, 176.74%, 182.48%, and 144.85%, respectively; p < 0.05). For all procedures, overall mortality significantly decreased by 45.34% (p = 0.001) and overall morbidity increased by 33.82% (p = 0.0002). For all procedures except ACDF, which saw a significantly decrease by 8.75% (p < 0.0001), length of hospital stay was unchanged.ConclusionsFor CSM patients between 2001 and 2010, combined surgical approach increased sixfold, posterior only approach increased threefold, and ACDF doubled; laminoplasties without fusion volume remained the same. Mortality decreased whereas morbidity and total charges increased. Length of stay decreased only for ACDF approach. This study provides clinically useful data to direct future research, improving patient outcomes.     

Comparison of allograft and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage subsidence rates in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF)

Structural allografts and PEEK cages are commonly used interbody fusion devices in ACDF. The subsidence rates of these two spacers have not yet been directly compared. The primary aim of this study was to compare the subsidence rate of allograft and PEEK cage in ACDF. The secondary aim was to determine if the presence of subsidence affects the clinical outcome. We reviewed 67 cases (117 levels) of ACDF with either structural allograft or PEEK cages. There were 85 levels (48 cases) with PEEK and 32 levels (19 cases) with allograft spacers. Anterior and posterior disc heights at each operative level were measured at immediate and 6 months post-op. Subsidence was defined as a decrease in anterior or posterior disc heights >2 mm. NDI of the subsidence (SG) and non-subsidence group (NSG) were recorded. Chi-square test was used to analyze subsidence rates. T-test was used to analyze clinical outcomes (α = 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between subsidence rates of the PEEK (29%; 25/85) and allograft group (28%; 9/32) (p = 0.69). Overall mean subsidence was 2.3 ± 1.7 mm anteriorly and 2.6 ± 1.2 mm posteriorly. Mean NDI improvement was 11.7 (from 47.1 to 35.4; average follow-up: 12 mos) for the SG and 14.0 (from 45.8 to 31.8; average follow-up: 13 mos) for the NSG (p = 0.74). Subsidence rate does not seem to be affected by the use of either PEEK or allograft as spacers in ACDF. Furthermore, subsidence alone does not seem to be predictive of clinical outcomes of ACDF.     

Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 versus iliac crest bone graft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: Dysphagia and dysphonia rates in the early postoperative period with review of the literature

Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) is a growth factor utilized to stimulate bone development in several clinical scenarios. Although the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved this therapeutic modality for only two applications, it is frequently used off-label in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures as an alternative to iliac crest bone graft (ICBG), the prior standard of care. This usage has been a source of controversy in the medical community due to evidence of increased rates of postoperative edema and dysphagia. This retrospective cohort study investigates two groups of 200 patients having undergone ACDF, one using rhBMP-2 and the other using ICBG, to evaluate the incidence of complications in the early postoperative period. A significant reduction in average length of stay was found in the rhBMP-2 cohort (1.40 days) compared to the ICBG cohort (1.85 days) as well as a significantly increased rate of dysphagia (25.5% in rhBMP-2 vs. 15% in ICBG; p = 0.01). An increased rate of dysphonia was observed among patients undergoing revision surgery (25.0%) compared to primary surgery (1.6%), but stratification by number of levels, gender, and smoking status yielded no differences in complication rates. Our evaluation of two large cohorts along with review of the literature on the topic sheds light on potential benefits and risks of rhBMP-2 in ACDF procedures. Further investigation is warranted to determine if clinical gains outweigh the potential harms of rhBMP-2 use in this setting.     

Difference in canal encroachment by the fusion mass between anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with bone autograft and anterior plating,and stand-alone cage

We conducted a prospective randomized study comparing stand-alone cage and bone autograft and plate implants in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01011569). Our interim analysis showed autologous bone graft with plating was superior to a stand-alone cage for segmental lordosis. During this analysis, we noted a difference in canal encroachment by the fusion mass between the two fusion groups. A narrow cervical spinal canal is an important factor in the development of cervical spondylotic myelopathy, therefore this unexpected potential risk of spinal cord compression necessitated another interim analysis to investigate whether there was a difference in canal encroachment by the fusion mass between the two groups. Patients had a minimum 1 year of follow-up. The Neck Disability Index, neck and arm pain Visual Analog Scales and lateral radiographs, including bone fusion patterns, were evaluated. Twenty-seven (16 males, 11 females, mean age 54.8 years) and 31 (24 males, seven females, mean age 54.5 years) patients were in the cage and plate group, respectively. Both groups improved after surgery. Fusion began at 2.6 months and 1.3 months and finished at 6.7 months and 4.0 months in 24 (88.9%) and 28 (90.3%) patients in the cage and plate group, respectively. Encroachment into the spinal canal by the fusion mass was significantly different between the fusion types, occuring in 21 (77.8%) patients in the cage group versus six (19.4%) in the plate group (p = 0.003). There was a high incidence of spinal canal encroachment by the fusion mass in the stand-alone cage group, possibly limiting use in narrow spinal canals.     

Effect of patient’s sex on early perioperative outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

ObjectiveDifferences in morbidity and mortality measures between males and females have been demonstrated for a variety of spinal surgeries, however, studies of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) are limited. To investigate the impact of sex on 30-day perioperative outcomes of ACDF.MethodsRetrospective 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort study. Patients who underwent ACDF between 2016 and 2018 were reviewed from the ACS-NSQIP database. Propensity score matching and subgroup analysis were used.Results21,180 patients met inclusion criteria. 11,194 patients underwent single-level ACDF and 9986 patients underwent multi-level ACDF. In the single-level group, there were 6168 (55.1%) males and 5026 (44.9%) females. In the multi-level group, there were 5033 (50.4%) males and 4953 (49.6%) females. In both single/multi-level groups, females were more likely to be of older age, be functionally dependent, and have higher BMI and lower preoperative hematocrit level. Males were more likely to be Caucasian, smokers, have myelopathy, diabetes mellitus, hypertension and bleeding disorders. In both single/multi-level groups, except for the higher incidence of urinary tract infection (UTI) in females and myocardial infarction (MI) in males, there were no significant differences in morbidity and mortality between males and females.ConclusionsSeveral differences in demographics and baseline health status exist between males and females undergoing ACDF. When attempting to control for comorbid conditions, we found that sex by itself is not an independent risk factor for higher perioperative morbidity or mortality in patients undergoing ACDF, except for the higher incidence of UTI in females and MI in males. These results are important findings for clinicians and spine surgeons while counseling patients undergoing this type of procedure.     

Clinical and radiographic features of hybrid surgery for the treatment of skip-level cervical degenerative disc disease: A minimum 24-month follow-up

We describe the radiographic changes of IS and investigate the safety and feasibility of hybrid surgery (HS) coupling cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of skip-level cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD). Twenty-seven patients who received HS were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical evaluation based on the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores. Radiographic parameters included cervical alignment (CA), functional spine unite (FSU) angle of intermediated segment (IS), range of motion (ROM) and intervertebral disc height (IDH). Data regarding radiographic changes at IS were collected. The mean follow-up duration of 30.10 months. Compared with preoperative value, JOA, NDI and VAS scores significantly improved after surgery (p < 0.05). The CA was recovered significantly after surgery (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the FSU angle and the IDH of IS between before and at 24 months postoperatively (p > 0.05). The ROM of IS significantly decreased at the first week after surgery (p < 0.05), was similar to preoperative value at 3 months postoperatively and significantly increased after 6 months (p < 0.05). Radiographic changes at IS were observed in 2 patients and Class II Heterotopic ossification (HO) was detected in 2 patients. HS is a safe and feasible alternative procedure for the treatment of skip-level CDDD. It preserved the IS intact and achieved satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes over a 24-month follow-up.     

The application of a zero-profile implant in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

We analyzed the clinical efficacy of the Zero-P implant (Synthes GmbH Switzerland, Oberdorf, Switzerland) in the treatment of single level cervical spondylotic myelopathy. The clinical data of 47 patients with single level cervical spondylotic myelopathy were retrospectively analyzed. Twenty-two patients were treated with a Zero-P implant (Group A) and 25 with a titanium plate with cage (Group B) between January 2009 and September 2010. Operative time, intraoperative blood loss, preoperative and postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores and JOA recovery rate, dysphagia incidence and adjacent segment degeneration rate were measured. The mean operative time in Group A and Group B was 98.18 minutes and 105.4 minutes, respectively. The average intraoperative blood loss in Group A and Group B was 87.95 ml and 92.4 ml, respectively. There were no statistical differences in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (p > 0.05). The JOA score was significantly improved in the two groups (p < 0.001), and the recovery rate was similar (60.86% for Group A versus 62.95% for Group B, p > 0.05). Dysphagia was experienced by one (4.5%) patient in Group A and eight (32%) patients in Group B, which was significantly different (p = 0.044). There was no statistical significance found in the adjacent level degeneration rates between Group A and Group B (p = 0.330). The Zero-P implant and traditional titanium plate with cage are effective treatments for single level cervical spondylotic myelopathy, but the Zero-P implant has a lower dysphagia incidence.