Effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on immobility time in the tail suspension test in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice

We examined the effects of fluoxetine and fluvoxamine, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and desipramine, a selective noradrenaline (NA) reuptake inhibitor, given alone or in combination with diazepam on immobility time in the tail suspension test in diabetic mice. Immobility time was significantly longer in diabetic than in nondiabetic mice. Diazepam (0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg s.c.) dose-dependently decreased immobility time in diabetic mice to the level observed in saline-treated nondiabetic mice. However, diazepam had no significant effect on immobility time in nondiabetic mice. Fluoxetine (3-56 mg/kg i.p.) and desipramine (1-30 mg/kg i.p.) produced marked, dose-dependent suppression of immobility time in both nondiabetic and diabetic mice. However, anti-immobility effects of fluoxetine and desipramine in diabetic mice were less than those in nondiabetic mice. Fluvoxamine (3-30 mg/kg i.p.) produced a dose-dependent suppression of immobility time in nondiabetic mice but not in diabetic mice. The anti-immobility effects of fluoxetine, fluvoxamine and desipramine in nondiabetic mice were antagonized by pretreatment with diazepam (0.3 mg/kg s.c.). Furthermore, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine and desipramine had no effect on the immobility time in diazepam (0.3 mg/kg s.c.)-treated diabetic mice. These results indicate that the anti-immobility effects of SSRIs and desipramine are less in diabetic mice than in nondiabetic mice in the tail suspension test. Furthermore, in diabetic mice, SSRIs and selective NA reuptake inhibitors did not affect immobility time even though the prolonged duration of immobility was suppressed by pretreatment with diazepam.     

Desensitization of 5-HT(1A) autoreceptors by a low chronic fluoxetine dose effect of the concurrent administration of WAY-100635.

Using microdialysis, receptor autoradiography and in situ hybridization, we examined the effects of fluoxetine alone or with WAY-100635 on: (a) extracellular 5-HT in frontal cortex; and (b) density and sensitivity of 5-HT(1A) autoreceptors in rat brain. WAY-100635 (0.3 mg/kg, s.c.) doubled the increase in extracellular 5-HT produced by fluoxetine (3 mg/kg, i.p.) in frontal cortex. Two-week minipump treatments with these daily doses significantly raised extracellular 5-HT to 275 +/- 33% (fluoxetine) and 245 +/- 10% (fluoxetine plus WAY-100635) of controls. Fluoxetine 3 mg/kg.day desensitized dorsal raphe 5-HT(1A) autoreceptors, an effect prevented by the concurrent WAY-100635 administration. However, WAY-100635 (alone or with fluoxetine) did not change 5-HT(1A) autoreceptor sensitivity. The density of 5-HT(1A) receptors and its encoding mRNA, was unaffected by these treatments. These results suggest that prolonged blockade of 5-HT(1A) receptors in vivo prevents the autoreceptor desensitization induced by fluoxetine but does not result in receptor sensitization.     

Antagonism by WAY-100635 of the effects of 8-OH-DPAT on performance on a free-operant timing schedule in intact and 5-HT-depleted rats

In this experiment we examined the effect of a serotonin receptor (5-HT1A) agonist and antagonist WAY-100635 (N-[2-(4-[2-methoxy-phenyl]-1-piperazinyl)ethyl]-N-2-pyridinylcyclohexane-carboxamide) on temporal differentiation, in intact rats and rats whose serotonergic (5-HTergic) pathways had been destroyed by 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine (5,7-DHT). Thirteen rats received 5,7-DHT-induced lesions of the median and dorsal raphe nuclei; 14 rats received sham lesions. They were trained to press two levers (A and B) in 50-s trials, in which reinforcement was contingent upon responding on A in the first half, and B in the second half, of the trial. Logistic psychophysical curves were fitted to the relative response rate data (percent responding on B, %B), for derivation of timing indices [T50 (time corresponding to %B=50%), slope, Weber fraction] following WAY-100635, 8-OH-DPAT [8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin], combinations of WAY-100635+8-OH-DPAT, and vehicle alone. WAY-100635 (30, 100 and 300 microg/kg, s.c.) did not affect the timing indices. 8-OH-DPAT (100, 200 microg/kg, s.c.) reduced T50 without affecting the Weber fraction. WAY-100635 (300 microg/kg) abolished the effect of 8-OH-DPAT on T50 in both the lesioned and sham-lesioned groups. 5-HT levels in the neocortex, hippocampus, amygdala, nucleus accumbens and hypothalamus of the lesioned group were <20% of those in the sham-lesioned group; catecholamine levels were unaffected. The results confirm that 8-OH-DPAT disrupts temporal differentiation in a free-operant psychophysical schedule, reducing T50, and indicate that this effect of 8-OH-DPAT is mediated by postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors.     

Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol prolongs the immobility time in the mouse forced swim test: involvement of cannabinoid CB(1) receptor and serotonergic system

In the present study, we investigated the effect of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the principal psychoactive component of marijuana, on immobility time during the forced swim test. THC (2 and 6 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly prolonged the immobility time. In addition, THC at the same doses did not significantly affect locomotor activity in the open-field test. The selective cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist rimonabant (3 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly reduced the enhancement of immobility by THC (6 mg/kg). Similarly, the selective serotonin (5-HT) reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) citalopram (10 mg/kg, i.p.) and 5-HT(1A/7) receptor agonist 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino) tetralin (8-OH-DPAT, 0.3 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly reduced this THC-induced effect. Moreover, the selective 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(2-pyridinyl) cyclohexane carboxamide dihydrochloride (WAY100635, 1 mg/kg, i.p.) and the postsynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist MM-77 (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.) reversed this reduction effect of 8-OH-DPAT (0.3 mg/kg). In contrast, the selective 5-HT(7) receptor antagonist (R)-3-[2-[2-(4-methylpiperidin-1-yl)ethyl]pyrrolidine-1-sulfonyl]phenol hydrochloride (SB269970) had no effect on this reduction effect of 8-OH-DPAT. WAY100635 (1 mg/kg) also reversed the reduction effect of citalopram (10 mg/kg). These findings suggest that the 5-HT(1A) receptors are involved in THC-induced enhancement of immobility.     

Antagonism of the 5-HT1A receptor stimulus in a conditioned taste aversion procedure.

The conditioned taste aversion procedure in mice was used to test for blockade of the drug stimulus of the 5-HT1A receptor agonists (+/-)-8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin HBr (8-OH-DPAT), 1-(4-trifluoromethyl-2-pyridinyl)-4- [4-[2-oxo-1-pyrrolidinyl]butyl]piperazine (E)-2-butenedioate (Org 13011) and the 5-HT reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine. The conditioned taste aversion induced by 8-OH-DPAT (0.22 mg/kg) and Org 13011 (0.5 mg/kg) was readily blocked by the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(2-pyridinyl) cyclohexanecarboxamide trihydrochloride (WAY-100635) (0.1 mg/kg). The conditioned taste aversion induced by fluoxetine could not be antagonized by WAY-100635 nor by the 5-HT2 receptor antagonist mianserin. It is concluded that the conditioned taste aversion induced by 8-OH-DPAT or Org 13011 is mediated via 5-HT1A receptors. The results suggest that the conditioned taste aversion induced by fluoxetine is not exclusively mediated by 5-HT1A receptors nor exclusively by 5-HT2 receptors. The results also indicate that the conditioned taste aversion paradigm can be used to test for antagonism of stimulus properties of compounds.     

Antidepressant-like effect of leptin in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice

We previously reported that streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic mice showed the depressive-like behavior in the tail suspension test. It has also been reported that leptin-deficient obese mice demonstrate the depressive-like behavior. Since STZ-induced diabetes causes a marked decrease in plasma leptin levels, it is possible that decrease in leptin levels and the depressive-like behavior may somehow be related. Therefore, we examined the effect of leptin on the depressive-like behavior of STZ-induced diabetic mice in the tail suspension test. The prolonged duration of immobility in diabetic mice was dose-dependently and significantly suppressed by single treatment with leptin (0.1-1 mg/kg, i.p.) without affecting on the locomotor activity. Leptin did not affect either the duration of immobility or the locomotor activity in non-diabetic mice. The anti-immobility effect of leptin (1 mg/kg, i.p.) in diabetic mice was significantly antagonized by the selective serotonin2 (5-HT2) receptor antagonist LY53,857 (0.03 mg/kg, s.c.), but not by the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY-100635 (0.03 mg/kg, s.c.). Antagonists administered alone did not affect either the duration of immobility or the locomotor activity in diabetic mice. In conclusion, we suggest that leptin exerts the antidepressant-like effect in diabetic mice mediated by, at least in part, 5-HT2 receptors.     

Chronic fluoxetine-induced desensitization of 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B autoreceptors: regional differences and effects of WAY-100635

Desensitization of 5-HT(1A) and 5-HT(1B) autoreceptors is thought to be the mechanism underlying the therapeutic effects of fluoxetine and other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors when these are administered chronically. The blockade of 5-HT(1A) autoreceptors occurring on administration of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor together with a 5-HT(1A) autoreceptor antagonist is responsible for the acute increase in 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin, 5-HT) levels observed under these circumstances. The effects of repeated administration of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors together with 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonists have not been widely studied. In this work, we found that the effects of fluoxetine (5 mg/kg, i.p., daily for 12 days) to desensitize 5-HT(1B) autoreceptors in the frontal cortex, as measured by the effect of the locally administered 5-HT(1B) receptor agonist, 3-(1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyrid-4-yl)pyrrolo[3,2-b]pyrid-5-one (CP 93129), and to desensitize 5-HT(1A) autoreceptors as measured by the action of the 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist, 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino) tetralin (8-OH-DPAT; 50 microg/kg, s.c.) to reduce 5-HT levels in cortex, were prevented by concomitant administration of the 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist, N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(2-pyridinyl) cyclohexanecarboxamide (WAY-100635; 0.3 mg/kg, s.c.). 5-HT(1B) receptor activity in the hypothalamus, as measured by the effects of locally administered CP 93129, and 5-HT(1A) autoreceptor activity, as determined by the effects of subcutaneous 8-OH-DPAT to reduce 5-HT levels in hypothalamus, were not altered either by fluoxetine alone or by fluoxetine in the presence of WAY-100635. The data suggest that the regulation of extracellular levels of 5-HT in the cortex and hypothalamus is subject to different autoregulatory mechanisms.     

Effect of chronic fluoxetine and WAY-100635 treatment on serotonergic neurotransmission in the frontal cortex

Clinical augmentation strategies have shown that some improvement in antidepressant efficacy can be achieved by combining the beta-adrenergic/serotonin (5-HT)1A/1B receptor antagonist (+/-)pindolol with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). This has lead to the hypothesis that a combination of a 5-HT1A receptor antagonist with an SSRI will lead to a faster onset of antidepressant action. Although there is a significant accumulation of acute preclinical data supporting this rationale, until recently, there have been no investigations examining the chronic effects of combining an SSRI with a 5-HT1A receptor antagonist. Here, we determined the chronic effects of fluoxetine (10 mg/kg o.d.), administered in combination with the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY-100635 (1 mg/kg b.i.d.), on serotonergic neurotransmission in the frontal cortex using in-vivo microdialysis. Following chronic administration of fluoxetine +/- WAY-100635, functional changes in serotonergic neurotransmission, as well as 5-HT1A autoreceptors, were assessed by administering fluoxetine or (+/-) 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin [(+/-) 8-OH-DPAT] 24 h after the last chronic dose. Chronic administration of WAY-100635 alone produced no detectable change in the functional status of the 5-HT1A receptor. However, fluoxetine alone produced a time-dependent adaptation in serotonergic transmission such that fluoxetine (acutely administered on day 15) was able to produce a two-fold increase in extracellular 5-HT levels but the decrease in response to 8-OH-DPAT was completely attenuated. These data indicate that the fluoxetine-induced adaptation was mediated by desensitization of the 5-HT1A receptor. WAY-100635 given chronically in combination with fluoxetine blocked the SSRI-induced desensitization of the 5-HT1A receptor. Furthermore, chronic treatment with this combination produced no tolerance in terms of its ability to acutely increase forebrain 5-HT levels. These data suggest that augmentation of an SSRI by combined pharmacotherapy with a 5-HT1A antagonist would be effective upon prolonged exposure.     

Activation and blocking of 5-HT1A receptors influence on the immune response in CBA mice

5-HT1A type serotonin receptors influence the immunomodulating action of the selective preparations 8-OH-DPAT (5-HT1A receptor agonist) and WAY-100635 (5-HT1A receptor antagonist) in CBA mice. The activation of 5HT1A receptors with 8-OH-DPAT (1 mg/kg) decreased, while their blocking with WAY-100635 (1 mg/kg) increased the reaction intensity at the peak of response to immunization with ram erythrocytes. Preliminary blocking of the 5-HT1A receptors with WAY-100635 prevented the inhibiting action of 8-OH-DPAT.     

Involvement of 5-hydroxytryptamine(1A) receptors in nicotine-induced tail tremor in rats

Involvement of the serotonergic system in tail tremor induced by repeated administration of nicotine was investigated in rats. Tail tremor induced by nicotine (0.5 mg/kg, s.c.) was suppressed by a 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist, N-?2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl-]ethyl?-N-(2-pyridinyl)cycloh exanecarboxamide trihydrochloride (WAY-100635; 0.3-3 mg/kg, i.p.), but not by a 5-HT(2) receptor antagonist, ketanserin (0.1-0.3 mg/kg, i.p). The 5-HT(1A) receptor agonists, buspirone (1-20 mg/kg, i.p.), gepirone (1-10 mg/kg, i.p.), tandospirone (1-10 mg/kg, i.p.) and (+/-)-8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT; 0.01-0.1 mg/kg, s.c.), enhanced the tail tremor. The enhancement of tail tremor by buspirone (10 mg/kg, i.p.) was blocked by WAY-100635 (0.3-3 mg/kg, i.p.). These findings suggest that nicotine-induced tail tremor is mediated by 5-HT(1A) receptors and that 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonists are effective in the treatment of tremor.     

Diabetes attenuates the antidepressant-like effect mediated by the activation of 5-HT1A receptors in the mouse tail suspension test]

Several lines of evidence have indicated that the prevalence of psychiatric disorders in diabetic subjects is higher than that in the general population, however, little information is available on the effects of antidepressants in diabetes. In the present review, we summarized the effect of diabetes on the central serotonergic systems and the efficacy of serotonergic antidepressants. Streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice showed prolonged duration of immobility compared to non-diabetic mice in the tail suspension test. This behavioral change was unrelated to the transient increases in blood glucose concentrations or decreased body weights by diabetes. Fluoxetine, a selective serotonin (5-HT) reuptake inhibitor, reduced the duration of immobility in both non-diabetic and diabetic mice. However, a selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY-100635 reversed the antidepressant-like effect of fluoxetine only in non-diabetic mice. In addition, a 5-HT1A receptor agonist 8-OH-DPAT reduced the duration of immobility in non-diabetic mice, but not in diabetic mice. These results suggest a possibility that the antidepressant-like effect mediated by the activation of 5-HT1A receptors may be attenuated by diabetes.     

WAY100635 prevents the changes induced by fluoxetine upon the 5-HT1A receptor functionality

5-HT1A receptor-mediated signalling in rat brain was evaluated after chronic administration (14 days; s.c.) of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SRRI) fluoxetine (10 mg/kg/day) alone, or in combination with the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY100635 (0.1 mg/kg/day). The density of 5-HT1A binding sites was unchanged following fluoxetine, WAY100635, or the combination of fluoxetine and WAY100635. However, the net stimulation of [35S]GTPgammaS binding induced by the 5-HT1A agonist 8-OH-DPAT was significantly attenuated in dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN), but not in hippocampus, after chronic fluoxetine. Moreover, depending of the area analysed, the basal binding of [35S]GTPgammaS was differentially affected by this treatment: increased in DRN and decreased in hippocampal dentate gyrus. Interestingly, the changes in [35S]GTPgammaS basal binding and on 5-HT1A receptors functionality were prevented by the concomitant administration of WAY100635. The inhibition of dorsal raphe firing by 8-OH-DPAT was also attenuated in fluoxetine-treated rats (ED50 = 2.12 +/- 0.32 microg/kg and 4.34 +/- 0.09 microg/kg, for vehicle and fluoxetine respectively), an effect which was also prevented by the concomitant administration of WAY100635 (ED50 = 2.10 +/- 0.58 microg/kg). Chronic administration of WAY100635 alone did not affect the 5-HT1A receptor-induced stimulation of [35S]GTPgammaS binding, nor the 8-OH-DPAT-induced inhibition of 5-HT neuron firing. These results demonstrate that the concomitant blockade of 5-HT1A receptors when administering fluoxetine prevents those adaptive changes of 5-HT1A receptor function associated with the chronic administration of this antidepressant. These findings could be relevant from the therapeutic point of view, and further support the potential benefit of treatments with a SSRI/5-HT1A receptor antagonist combination.     

Rapid desensitization of 5-HT(1A) receptors in Fawn-Hooded rats after chronic fluoxetine treatment.

Anxiety, platelet serotonin (5-HT) content and functions of the 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) were measured in Sprague--Dawley (SD) and Fawn-Hooded (FH) rats, a strain with genetically impaired 5-HT storage and reuptake system and a putative model of depression and anxiety. In addition, the effects of 7 and 16 days treatment with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) fluoxetine on 8-OH-DPAT-induced responses were studied. FH rats showed significantly higher anxiety in the social interaction test, and much lower platelet 5-HT content compared to SD rats. The efficacy of 8-OH-DPAT (15-120 microg/kg, i.v.) to induce lower lip retraction (an effect mediated by median raphe receptors) was increased in FH rats. In most FH but only a few SD rats a special neurological syndrome, clonic movement of the masseters and in-and-out movement of the eyeballs, was induced by 8-OH-DPAT, and this behaviour like other effects of 8-OH-DPAT, was completely blocked by pretreatment with the 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist WAY-100635. In SD rats fluoxetine (10 mg/kg/day, i.p.) caused a moderate inhibition of 8-OH-DPAT-induced hypothermia, an effect mediated most likely by hypothalamic 5-HT(1A) receptors, (-19% and -40% after 7 and 16 days of fluoxetine, 24 h after the last injection, respectively). In FH rats fluoxetine caused a rapid and complete reduction in the 8-OH-DPAT-induced hypothermia (-65% and -91% after 7 and 16 days of fluoxetine, respectively). Fluoxetine caused no change in lower lip retraction but a reduction in the masseter-eyeball syndrome in both SD and FH rats. Our data provide evidence that in FH rats, median raphe 5-HT(1A) receptors are hypersensitive, and the hypothalamic 5-HT(1A) receptor desensitization, caused by SSRI antidepressants, is faster and more complete. These data support the notion that chronic treatment with SSRIs induces a desensitization of some 5-HT(1A) receptor populations, and impaired 5-HT storage and reuptake may accelerate this process.     

The effect of the 5-HT1A receptor agonist, 8-OH-DPAT, on motion-induced emesis in Suncus murinus

In the present study we evaluated the role of 5-HT(1A) receptors in mediating the inhibitory action of 8-OH-DPAT, a 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist, in motion sickness in Suncus murinus. 8-OH-DPAT (0.1 mg/kg, i. p) attenuated motion-induced emesis which was associated with an increase in the latency of the onset to the first emetic episode. Pre-treatment with methysergide (a 5-HT(1/2/7) receptor antagonist, 1.0 mg/kg, i. p.), WAY-100635 (a 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist, 1.0 mg/kg, i. p.), SB269970A (a 5-HT(7) receptor antagonist, 1.0 and 5.0 mg/kg, i. p.), ondansetron (a 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist, 1.0 mg/kg, i. p) or GR13808 (a 5-HT(4) receptor antagonist, 0.5 mg/kg, i. p) failed to modify the inhibitory action of 8-OH-DPAT on motion sickness. Furthermore, the application of either methysergide, WAY-100635, SB269970A, ondansetron or GR13808 alone had no effect on motion sickness in its own right. These data indicate that neither 5-HT(1A) nor any 5-HT(2) receptor subtypes, 5-HT(3), 5-HT(4) and 5-HT(7) receptors are likely to be involved in the inhibition of motion-induced emesis mediated by 8-OH-DPAT.     

Role of uptake inhibition and autoreceptor activation in the control of 5-HT release in the frontal cortex and dorsal hippocampus of the rat

1. Using brain microdialysis, we compared the relative role of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT; serotonin) blockade and somatodendritic 5-HT(1A) and/or terminal 5-HT(1B) autoreceptor activation in the control of 5-HT output. 2. Fluoxetine (10 mg kg(-1) i.p.) doubled the 5-HT output in frontal cortex and dorsal hippocampus. The 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist WAY 100635, (0.3 mg kg(-1) s.c.) potentiated the effect of fluoxetine only in frontal cortex (to approximately 500 % of baseline). 3. Methiothepin (10 mg kg(-1) s.c.) further enhanced the 5-HT rise induced by fluoxetine+WAY 100635, to 835+/-179% in frontal cortex and 456+/-24% in dorsal hippocampus. Locally applied, methiothepin potentiated the fluoxetine-induced 5-HT rise more in the former area. 4. The selective 5-HT(1B) receptor antagonist SB-224289 (4 mg kg(-1) i.p.) enhanced the effect of fluoxetine (10 mg kg(-1) i.p.) in both areas. As with methiothepin, SB-224289 (4 mg kg(-1) i.p.) further enhanced the 5-HT increase produced by fluoxetine+WAY 100635 more in frontal cortex (613+/-134%) than in dorsal hippocampus (353+/-59%). 5. Locally applied, fluoxetine (10 - 300 microM; EC(50)=28 - 29 microM) and citalopram (1 - 30 microM; EC(50)=1.0 - 1.4 microM) increased the 5-HT output two to three times more in frontal cortex than in dorsal hippocampus. These data suggest that the comparable 5-HT increase produced by systemic fluoxetine in frontal cortex and dorsal hippocampus results from a greater effect of reuptake blockade in frontal cortex that is offset by a greater autoreceptor-mediated inhibition of 5-HT release. As a result, 5-HT autoreceptor antagonists preferentially potentiate the effect of fluoxetine in frontal cortex.     

8-OH-DPAT acts on both 5-HT1A and 5-HT7 receptors to induce hypothermia in rodents

Studies using selective drugs and knockout mice have demonstrated that the 5-HT(7) receptor plays an instrumental role in serotonin-induced hypothermia. There is also evidence supporting an involvement of the 5-HT(1A) receptor, although mainly from studies using 8-hydroxy-2(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT), a 5-HT(1A/7) receptor agonist. Here we studied the effects of 8-OH-DPAT and selective antagonists for the 5-HT(1A) and 5-HT(7) receptors on body temperature in rats, wild-type (5-HT(7)(+/+)) mice and knockout (5-HT(7)(-/-)) mice. At lower doses (0.3-0.6 mg/kg, i.p.), 8-OH-DPAT decreased body temperature in 5-HT(7)(+/+) mice but not in 5-HT(7)(-/-) mice. At a higher dose (1 mg/kg, i.p.) 8-OH-DPAT induced hypothermia in both 5-HT(7)(-/-) and 5-HT(7)(+/+) mice. The 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist (S)-N-tert-butyl-3-(4-(2-methoxyphenyl)piperazine-1-yl)-2-phenylpropanamide (WAY-100135) (10 mg/kg, i.p.) inhibited the effect of 8-OH-DPAT at all doses in rats and mice. In 5-HT(7)(+/+) mice the selective 5-HT(7) receptor antagonist (R)-3-(2-(2-(4-methylpiperidin-1-yl)-ethyl)pyrrolidine-1-sulfonyl)phenol (SB-269970) (10 mg/kg, i.p.) fully inhibited the hypothermia induced by 0.3 mg/kg 8-OH-DPAT, but not that of higher doses. In rats, SB-269970 caused a 60% inhibition of the hypothermia induced by 0.3 mg/kg 8-OH-DPAT. Thus, both 5-HT(7) and 5-HT(1A) receptors are involved in a complex manner in thermoregulation, with the 5-HT(7) receptor being more important at lower, possibly more physiological, concentrations.     

Comparison of the effects of antidepressants on norepinephrine and serotonin concentrations in the rat frontal cortex: an in-vivo microdialysis study

The present study employed in-vivo microdialysis techniques in the freely moving rat to systematically compare the neurochemical effects of various antidepressant agents on extracellular concentrations of norepinephrine (NE) and serotonin (5-HT) in the frontal cortex. We found that acute administration of the tricyclic antidepressant, desipramine (3-30 mg/kg, s.c.) and the dual serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, venlafaxine (3-30 mg/kg, s.c.), produced dose-dependent and robust increases in cortical NE concentrations (498% and 403%, respectively). Conversely, acute injection of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, fluoxetine (30 mg/kg, s.c.) and paroxetine (1-10 mg/kg, s.c.), did not alter forebrain NE concentrations. However, paroxetine did produce a significant increase in cortical NE concentrations (164%) when administered at 30 mg/kg. These changes in NE were not paralleled by 5-HT, which showed no increase following administration of desipramine, venlafaxine, paroxetine or fluoxetine. Combination treatment with the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY-100635 (0.3 mg/kg, s.c.), significantly enhanced extracellular 5-HT concentrations following venlafaxine (10 and 30 mg/kg), fluoxetine (30 mg/kg) and paroxetine (3-30 mg/kg). Alternatively, WAY-100635 produced no augmentation of the antidepressant-induced changes in extracellular NE. Collectively, these studies show that paroxetine, at low to intermediate doses, and fluoxetine are selective for 5-HT versus NE systems, whereas venlafaxine produces similar effects on both 5-HT and NE levels at the effective doses tested.     

Role of the medial prefrontal cortex in 5-HT1A receptor-induced inhibition of 5-HT neuronal activity in the rat

1. We examined the involvement of the frontal cortex in the 5-HT2A receptor-induced inhibition of 5-HT neurones in the dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN) of the anaesthetized rat using single-unit recordings complemented by Fos-immunocytochemistry. 2. Both transection of the frontal cortex as well as ablation of the medial region of the prefrontal cortex (mPFC) significantly attenuated the inhibition of 5-HT neurones induced by systemic administration of the 5-HT1A receptor agonist, 8-OH-DPAT (0.5-16 microg kg(-1), i.v.). In comparison, the response to 8-OH-DPAT was not altered by ablation of the parietal cortex. The inhibitory effect of 8-OH-DPAT was reversed by the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY 100635 (0.1 mg kg(-1), i.v.) in all neurones tested. 3. In contrast, cortical transection did not alter the sensitivity of 5-HT neurones to iontophoretic application of 8-OH-DPAT into the DRN. Similarly, cortical transection did not alter the sensitivity of 5-HT neurones to systemic administration of the selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitor, paroxetine (0.1-0.8 mg kg(-1) , i.v.). 4. 8-OH-DPAT evoked excitation of mPFC neurones at doses (0.5-32 microg kg(-1), i.v.) in the range of those which inhibited 5-HT cell firing. At higher doses (32-512 microg kg(-1), i.v.) 8-OH-DPAT inhibited mPFC neurones. 8-OH-DPAT (0.1 mg kg(-1), s.c.) also induced Fos expression in the mPFC. The neuronal excitation and inhibition, as well as the Fos expression, were antagonized by WAY 100635. 5. These data add further support to the view that the inhibitory effect of 5-HT1A receptor agonists on the firing activity of DRN 5-HT neurones involves, in part, activation of a 5-HT1A receptor-mediated postsynaptic feedback loop centred on the mPFC.     

The role of alpha(1)-adrenoceptors and 5-HT(1A) receptors in the control of the micturition reflex in male anaesthetized rats

1. The effects of the alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists doxazosin (0.1 -- 2 mg kg(-1)), RS-100329 (alpha(1A); 0.01 -- 1 mg kg(-1)), RS-513815 (Ro 151-3815, alpha(1B); 0.3 -- 3 mg kg(-1)) and BMY 7378 (alpha(1D); 0.1 -- 1 mg kg(-1)), the 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist, 8-OH-DPAT (0.03 -- 0.3 mg kg(-1)) and antagonist WAY-100635 (0.03 -- 0.3 mg kg(-1)) were investigated (i.v.) on the 'micturition reflex' in the urethane anaesthetized male rat. 2. Reflex-evoked urethra contractions were most sensitive to the inhibitory action of RS-100329, followed by doxazosin, BMY 7378 and WAY-100635 and then RS-513815. The maximum inhibition was 66, 63, 54, 46 and 22% at doses of 0.3, 0.5, 0.3, 0.3 and 3 mg kg(-1) respectively. 3. BMY 7378 and 8-OH-DPAT decreased, while WAY-100635 increased, the pressure threshold to induce bladder contraction. WAY-100635 (0.01 mg kg(-1)) blocked the effects of BMY 7378 (1 mg kg(-1)) on bladder pressure and volume threshold. 4. Doxazosin, RS-100329 and BMY 7378 had a similar potency in inducing a fall in arterial blood pressure while WAY-100635 only caused a fall at the highest dose. 5. Therefore, reflex-evoked urethral contraction involves the activation of alpha(1A/1D)-adrenoceptors, as BMY 7378 and RS-100329 are similarly potent in attenuating this effect. The ability of WAY-100635 to attenuate this contraction may suggest that 5-HT(1A) receptors are also involved. However, as this inhibition occurred at the highest dose of WAY-100635, which also caused a fall in arterial blood pressure; this effect is considered to be due to blockade of alpha(1)-adrenoceptors not 5-HT(1A) receptors. Nevertheless the initiation of the 'micturition reflex' involves the activation of 5-HT(1A) receptors.     

5-HT1A receptor antagonists neither potentiate nor inhibit the effects of fluoxetine and befloxatone in the forced swim test in rats.

Recent clinical data suggest that coadministration of pindolol with an antidepressant, particularly the 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine, can shorten the time to onset of clinical activity and increase the proportion of responders. We have examined the interaction of antidepressants with 5-HT1A receptors using the forced swim test in rats using both (+/-)-pindolol and the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY 100,635 (N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(pyridinyl) cyclohexanecarboxamide trihydrochloride) in combination with either fluoxetine or the selective monoamine oxidase-A inhibitor befloxatone. 8-Hydroxy-dipropylaminotetralin (8-OH-DPAT; 0.125-1 mg/kg s.c.), used as a reference for 5-HT1A agonist activity, reduced immobility in the forced swim test and this effect was significantly antagonised by WAY 100,635. WAY 100,635 alone (0.01-0.1 mg/kg s.c.) was without effect, although a higher dose, 0.3 mg/kg s.c., had a nonsignificant tendency to increase immobility. In contrast, (+/-)-pindolol (1-16 mg/kg s.c.) significantly reduced immobility, but to a lesser extent than 8-OH-DPAT. As expected, the antidepressants fluoxetine (10-80 mg/kg p.o.) and befloxatone (0.03-1 mg/kg p.o.) dose-dependently reduced immobility time. When the antidepressants were combined with WAY 100,635 (0.1 mg/kg), WAY 100,635 either had no effect or, at relatively high doses, significantly reduced their activity in this test. Combination of the antidepressants with (+/-)-pindolol (2 or 4 mg/kg s.c.) failed to reveal a significant interaction. These results demonstrate that the anti-immobility effects of fluoxetine and befloxatone are neither facilitated nor antagonised by doses of WAY 100,635 that completely reverse the effects of 8-OH-DPAT. Furthermore, there was no evidence that coadministration of the antidepressants with (+/-)-pindolol was able to facilitate their antidepressant-like effects. Thus, whereas direct agonist activity at 5-HT1A receptors can modulate immobility in the forced swim test, this receptor subtype does not appear to play a major role in the antidepressant-like effects of fluoxetine or befloxatone under the conditions used in this study.