Effect of ranitidine on the disposition of orally and intravenously administered triazolam

The effect of orally administered ranitidine on the pharmacokinetic properties of orally and intravenously administered triazolam was determined. Twelve healthy males with a mean age of 35 years were enrolled in this four-way, randomized, crossover study. Each subject received a total of four treatments, each separated by one week. The treatments consisted of (1) one orally administered 0.25-mg triazolam tablet after treatment with ranitidine; (2) one orally administered 0.25-mg triazolam tablet, with no ranitidine pretreatment; (3) a 0.25-mg intravenous dose of triazolam after treatment with ranitidine; and (4) a 0.25-mg intravenous dose of triazolam, with no ranitidine pretreatment. Ranitidine pretreatment consisted of five 150-mg oral doses (as the hydrochloride salt) given every 12 hours; the last dose was given two hours before triazolam was administered. Blood samples were taken at intervals up to 12 hours after triazolam treatment. Serum triazolam concentrations were measured by modified high-performance liquid chromatography, and pharmacokinetic values were calculated. Pretreatment with ranitidine had no effect on the disposition of intravenously administered triazolam but significantly increased the area under the serum drug concentration-time curve of oral triazolam. Ranitidine pretreatment had no effect on triazolam's terminal elimination rate constant or on the time to reach maximum serum triazolam concentration. Ranitidine pretreatment increased the systemic availability of triazolam by increasing its absorption.     

The effect of antacid and ranitidine on droxicam pharmacokinetics.

Droxicam is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug that is a pro-drug of piroxicam. The influence of concomitant administration of antacid or ranitidine on droxicam pharmacokinetics has been investigated. On three separate phases, 15 healthy volunteers received a single oral 20-mg dose of droxicam either alone, with antacid (400 mg aluminum hydroxide + 400 mg magnesium hydroxide, three times/day), or with ranitidine (300 mg, two times/day) for 6 days. Piroxicam, the active substance from droxicam, was quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography. The pharmacokinetic parameters for droxicam given alone were: maximum peak plasma concentration (Cmax) = 1.53 +/- .21 micrograms/mL (mean +/- SD), time to peak concentration (Tmax) = 7.5 +/- 2.1 hr, t1/2a = 1.38 +/- .82 hour, t1/2el = 53.3 +/- 11.9 hr, Cl/F = 2.98 +/- .71 mL/min, volume of distribution (Vd/F) = 13.2 +/- 1.8 L and area under the curve (AUC) = 117.6 +/- 26.8 micrograms/hour/mL. The subject effect was significant for all the pharmacokinetic parameters except for the absorption half-life (P < .05). Concomitant antacid or ranitidine administration had no significant effect on any of the droxicam pharmacokinetic parameters. The results of this study suggest that antacid or ranitidine do not significantly alter the oral absorption or pharmacokinetic disposition of single-dose droxicam.     

Effect of food, an antacid, and the H2 antagonist ranitidine on the absorption of BAY 59-7939 (rivaroxaban), an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor, in healthy subjects

To investigate the influence of food and administration of an antacid (aluminum-magnesium hydroxide) or ranitidine on the absorption of BAY 59-7939 (rivaroxaban), 4 randomized studies were performed in healthy male subjects. In 2 food interaction studies, subjects received BAY 59-7939, either as two 5-mg tablets (fasted and fed), four 5-mg tablets (fasted), or one 20-mg tablet (fasted and fed). In 2 drug interaction studies, BAY 59-7939 (six 5-mg tablets) was given alone or with ranitidine (150 mg twice daily, preceded by a 3-day pretreatment phase) or antacid (10 mL). Plasma samples were obtained to assess pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of BAY 59-7939. In the presence of food, time to maximum concentration (t(max)) was delayed by 1.25 hours; maximum concentration (C(max)) and area under the curve (AUC) were increased, with reduced interindividual variability at higher doses of BAY 59-7939. Compared with baseline, BAY 59-7939 resulted in a relative increase in maximum prothrombin time (PT) prolongation of 44% (10 mg) and 53% (20 mg) in the fasted state, compared with 53% and 83% after food. Time to maximum PT prolongation was delayed by 0.5 to 1.5 hours after food, with no relevant influence of food type. No significant difference in C(max) and AUC was observed with coadministration of BAY 59-7939 and ranitidine or antacid.     

Synergy between low-dose ranitidine and antacid in decreasing gastric and oesophageal acidity and relieving meal-induced heartburn

BACKGROUND: The pathophysiology of recurrent postprandial heartburn and the basis for the effectiveness of antacids or low doses of histamine H2-receptor antagonists have not been well studied. METHODS: The selected subjects (n=26) had heartburn more than four times a week for at least 2 months, which was responsive to antacids. Gastric pH and oesophageal pH were measured for 1 h before, during, and 4.5 h after ingestion of a meal over 0.5 h. Heartburn severity was assessed at 15-min intervals beginning at the end of the meal. Each subject randomly received placebo, 75 mg ranitidine, 420 mg calcium carbonate, and ranitidine plus calcium carbonate. Values for pH were converted to acid concentration (mM) and integrated acidity was calculated from the cumulative, time-weighted means of the acid concentrations for every second of the postprandial recording period. RESULTS: There was a close temporal relationship between heartburn and oesophageal acidity. Most oesophageal acid exposure occurred over a 90-min period that began approximately 45 min after the end of the meal. During this period the gastric acid concentration was less than 5% of maximal. Ranitidine significantly decreased gastric but not oesophageal acidity, whilst antacid significantly decreased oesophageal but not gastric acidity. Ranitidine plus antacid significantly decreased both gastric and oesophageal acidity. Antacid alone and ranitidine plus antacid significantly decreased heartburn severity. CONCLUSIONS: Determining integrated gastric and oesophageal acidity provides novel information regarding the pathophysiology of meal-induced heartburn as well as the actions of low-dose ranitidine and antacid. For subjects with meal-induced heartburn, treatment with low-dose ranitidine plus antacid is particularly effective in decreasing gastric and oesophageal acidity as well as heartburn severity.     

Effect of H2-receptor antagonists on acetaminophen-induced hepatic injury

The effects of H2-antagonists on acetaminophen-induced hepatic injury were examined. Rats were administered acetaminophen at the dose of 800 mg/kg body, 60 hr after injection of 3-methylcholanthrene. As an H2-antagonist, cimetidine (200 mg/kg), ranitidine (50 mg or 100 mg/kg), or famotidine (20 mg or 40 mg/kg) was administered before and after acetaminophen injection. The group administered only acetaminophen had been severely damaged as evaluated by changes in serum transaminase, P-450 content, aminopyrine demethylation, glutathione content and histological study, but administration of 200 mg cimetidine together with acetaminophen significantly reduced the hepatic injury to nearly the control level. Ranitidine had no protective effect against hepatic injury at the dose of 50 mg, which appears to have the same antacid effect as 200 mg cimetidine, whereas it had a slight but significant protective effect as evaluated by the transaminase level, glutathione content and histological study at the dose of 100 mg. Famotidine had no effect against acetaminophen induced hepatic injury. Because famotidine had no effect, the protection by H2-antagonist against acetaminophen-induced hepatic injury cannot be explained by the decrease in hepatic blood flow alone. Therefore, inhibition of P-450 activity seems to be more important for reducing the generation of the reactive metabolites of acetaminophen than hepatic blood flow decrease.     

Gastrointestinal Transit and Distribution of Ranitidine in the Rat

Purpose. Ranitidine gastrointestinal distribution was examined in the rat small intestine after oral administration to determine whether intestinal transit or secretion (exsorption) may influence the appearance of secondary peaks in ranitidine serum concentration-time profiles. Methods. Male Sprague-Dawley rats received ranitidine (50 mg/kg) by oral gavage, and the mass of ranitidine recovered in all small intestinal segments (~12 cm each) was determined 30, 60, 90, or 120 min after administration. In a separate group of anesthetized rats, the small intestine was divided into two segments of equal length that were perfused with normal saline in a single-pass manner. Rats received an escalating, zero-order IV infusion of ranitidine for 30 min, and venous blood and intestinal effluent were collected over 90 min to quantitate ranitidine exsorption. Results. Thirty min after oral administration, >50% of the recovered ranitidine mass resided in the lower half of the small intestine in all rats. Ranitidine mass in 5 of 16 rats displayed a bimodal distribution with significant amounts of ranitidine recovered from the stomach 60 to 90 min after dosing. Ranitidine exsorption was more efficient from the lower jejunum and ileum than from the duodenum and upper jejunum. However, intestinal secretion of ranitidine was minor (5% of the IV dose). Conclusions. Ranitidine absorption from the lower ileum contributes significantly to systemic ranitidine concentrations before and during the time of the first concentration maximum. Separation of the drug mass into multiple boluses may contribute to secondary peaks in ranitidine concentration-time profiles. Exsorption did not contribute significantly to ranitidine distribution in the gastrointestinal tract.     

The effect of an antacid and food on the absorption of cimetidine and ranitidine

The effect of varying doses of a liquid antacid preparation containing magnesium hydroxide, aluminum hydroxide and simethicone on the absorption of the H2-receptor antagonists, cimetidine and ranitidine, was determined in 2 groups of 11 volunteers; one group fasted and one group fed a standardized breakfast. The antacid alone caused a significant decrease in the AUC of cimetidine (24%). Similarly, concomitant antacid caused a 59% decrease in the AUC of ranitidine. There were no effects on any of the other pharmacokinetic parameters examined. The absorption of both drugs was similar in fasted and fed volunteers, but in the fed volunteers the antacid did not produce the decrease in AUC seen in the fasted volunteers. These data suggest that H2-receptor antagonists should not be taken at the same time as antacids.     

Comparison of two antimuscarinic drugs, pirenzepine and propantheline, on gastric acid secretion, serum gastrin concentration, salivary flow and heart rate in patients with duodenal ulcer disease

Effects of orally-administered pirenzepine and propantheline bromide on food-stimulated gastric acid secretion, serum gastrin concentration, salivary flow and heart rate were compared in 10 duodenal ulcer patients in a placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Pirenzepine inhibited acid secretion by 25, 36 and 44% at doses of 50, 100, and 150 mg, respectively, while propantheline inhibited acid secretion by 32 and 41% at doses of 15 and 45 mg, respectively. None of the doses of pirenzepine affected food-stimulated serum gastrin concentrations, whereas 45 mg propantheline increased serum gastrin concentration significantly above placebo control. Enhancement of gastrin release by propantheline was not due to its antisecretory effect since intragastric pH after the meal was held constant at 5.0 by intragastric titration in vivo. Pirenzepine had no significant effect on heart rate and little or no inhibitory effect on salivary volume, depending on the dose administered. By contrast, both doses of propantheline increased heart rate and reduced salivary volume significantly (P less than 0.05). Thus, pirenzepine and propantheline in the doses administered inhibited acid secretion to approximately the same extent but pirenzepine had fewer effects on other organs.     

Short report: a comparative study of the interaction between antacid and H2-receptor antagonists

The influence of concomitant antacid administration on the relative bioavailability of the H2-receptor antagonists cimetidine, famotidine, nizatidine and ranitidine, was investigated in a panel of 21 healthy, adult male volunteers in an eight-way crossover trial. Administration with antacid reduced the bioavailability of all agents tested. The reduction in area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) was greatest for cimetidine (23%) and ranitidine (26%) and least for nizatidine (12%) and famotidine (19%). Reductions in peak serum concentration (C_max) followed a similar pattern. The times of peak serum concentrations were not affected by antacid. Comparison of the relative bioavailability among all drugs tested showed no statistically significant differences in the effect of antacid administration on these agents. However, a high degree of intersubject variability was observed.     

Effect of an aluminum- and magnesium-containing antacid on the bioavailability of garenoxacin in healthy volunteers

Study Objective . To evaluate the effect of an aluminum- and magnesium-containing antacid (Al-Mg antacid), which contains a high concentration of cations, on the pharmacokinetics of garenoxacin. Design . Prospective, randomized, open-label, control-balanced, residual-effects—design study. Setting . Pharmaceutical company—affiliated study clinic. Subjects . Twenty healthy volunteers who were garenoxacin naïve. Intervention . Subjects were randomly assigned to receive three of six oral treatments, each separated by a 7-day washout period: garenoxacin 600 mg administered alone, with concomitant Al-Mg antacid, 2 or 4 hours before Al-Mg antacid, or 2 or 4 hours after Al-Mg antacid. The Al-Mg antacid dose was 20 ml, which contained aluminum hydroxide 900 mg and magnesium hydroxide 800 mg. Measurements and Main Results . The pharmacokinetics and safety of garenoxacin were assessed. For each treatment, serial blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis of garenoxacin were collected before and up to 72 hours after garenoxacin dosing. Absence of effect of Al-Mg antacid on garenoxacin area under the concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC_0–∞) and maximum observed plasma concentration (C_max) were concluded if the 90% confidence interval of the adjusted geometric mean ratios with and without the antacid were contained within 0.80–1.25 and 0.70–1.43, respectively. Exposure to garenoxacin measured by AUC_0–∞, a parameter well correlated with efficacy, was reduced by 58% when coadministered with Al-Mg antacid and reduced by 22% and 16% when administered 2 and 4 hours after the antacid, respectively. Administration of garenoxacin 4 hours before Al-Mg antacid had no effect on AUC_0–∞ or C_max of garenoxacin, whereas administration 2 hours before the antacid resulted in a nonclinically relevant (12%) reduction in AUC_0–∞ of garenoxacin. Conclusion . Exposure to garenoxacin was significantly decreased when garenoxacin was coadministered with Al-Mg antacid or within 2 hours after the antacid. The magnitude of the changes in garenoxacin exposure suggests that garenoxacin should be administered at least 2 hours before or 4 hours after administration of Al-Mg antacid or other cation-containing products.     

Effect of an antacid on gastrointestinal absorption of theophylline.

The effect of a magnesium-aluminum hydroxide antacid (Maalox) on the oral absorption of aminophylline tablets was studied. Twelve healthy adults were administered 200 mg of aminophylline alone or with 30 ml of antacid in a complete crossover study. Blood samples were drawn at 0.33, 0.67, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours following theophylline (as aminophylline) administration. Theophylline plasma levels were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. The plasma theophylline concentrations of the group receiving theophylline only were significantly greater than those of the group receiving theophylline plus antacid at the 0.67- and 1-hour sample times only (p less than 0.05). The extent of theophylline absorption and the eliminated rate constant were not significantly affected by the antacid. Antacid significantly decreased theophylline's absorption rate constant (p less than 0.05), indicating a slower absorption of theophylline with antacid. Concurrent administration of the antacid Maalox should not significantly change theophylline's clinical effect.     

Pharmacokinetics of bismuth and ranitidine following single doses of ranitidine bismuth citrate

1 The pharmacokinetics of bismuth and ranitidine derived from ranitidine bismuth citrate given in single oral doses ranging from 200  mg to 1600  mg were evaluated in healthy subjects.
2 Bismuth was only minimally absorbed (<0.5% of the amount dosed) after administration of ranitidine bismuth citrate, and peak plasma concentrations never exceeded 33  ng  ml⁻¹ in any subject. Plasma concentrations and urinary recoveries of bismuth at doses up to and including 800  mg were relatively constant and not proportional to dose. Bismuth absorption was increased more than proportionally with the dose at 1600  mg.
3 The pharmacokinetics of ranitidine after administration of ranitidine bismuth citrate were dose-proportional and consistent with previous observations for ranitidine administered alone.
4 Ranitidine bismuth citrate was well-tolerated in single oral doses of up to 1600  mg.     

Effect of food and an antacid on quinidine bioavailability

Two 200 mg quinidine sulfate tablets were administered to nine healthy male subjects in the fasting state, immediately after a balanced meal, and with 30ml of aluminum hydroxide gel using a complete crossover design. Serum and urine samples were taken over 32 and 60 h respectively. Quinidine concentrations were measured using a high-performance liquid chromatography assay specific for quinidine. Computer fitting of the data to several models indicated that a one-compartment model with zero-order absorption and a lag time best fit all the data. Quinidine elimination and urine pH were unaffected by the study conditions. While the maximum serum concentration (C_max) and area under the serum concentration—time curve (AUC) were unaffected by administration of quinidine with food or antacid, there was a 44 per cent increase (p < 0·10) in time to C_max (t_max) following quinidine administration with food. Thus, while the extent of quinidine absorption was unaffected by food or the antacid used, the rate of quinidine absorption was significantly reduced by food as reported earlier.     

Ranitidine for erosive oesophagitis: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study

A multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ranitidine 150 mg and 300 mg in 342 patients with erosive oesophagitis. Treatment was given four times daily, and continued for 12 weeks or until healing (that is, normal or only erythematous mucosa). Erosive oesophagitis healing rates, as determined by endoscopy, were significantly greater in ranitidine-treated patients by 4 weeks compared with those of placebo-treated patients. By 12 weeks, erosive oesophagitis healing rates were 83 and 81% for ranitidine-treated patients (150 and 300 mg, respectively) and 58% for placebo-treated patients (P less than or equal to 0.001, ranitidine vs. placebo). Symptomatic relief was achieved within 24 hours after starting either dosage of ranitidine. Heartburn frequency (P less than 0.001) and severity (P less than 0.001), as well as antacid consumed per week (P less than 0.001), were reduced in both ranitidine groups in comparison with placebo. Healing rates and symptom relief were similar in the two ranitidine groups. Both dosages of ranitidine were well tolerated. Ranitidine (150 mg) given four times daily appears to be as effective as 300 mg ranitidine given four times daily in patients with moderate to severe oesophageal erosions.     

Low-dose ranitidine for the relief of heartburn

BACKGROUND: Approximately 30% of adults in the USA suffer from heartburn or related symptoms monthly; more than 20% of these sufferers experience heartburn at least once per day. Although many rely on self-medication with antacids for the relief of their symptoms, treatments that decrease gastric volume as well as increase the pH of refluxed material should be more effective in relieving heartburn. AIM: To compare the safety and efficacy of low-dose regimens of ranitidine for the relief of heartburn. METHODS: Adults with at least a 3-month history of heartburn were eligible for this randomized, double-blind, parallel group, multicentre dose-ranging study. Following a 1-week open-label run-in phase to document baseline heartburn frequency, subjects were randomized to receive treatment with one tablet of either ranitidine 75 mg (n = 491), ranitidine 25 mg (n = 504), or placebo (n = 494), to be taken as needed up to four times daily for 2 weeks for the relief of heartburn. RESULTS: The ranitidine 75 mg regimen was clinically (> 10 percentage points) and statistically (P < 0.05) significantly more effective than placebo for all measured efficacy end-points in relieving heartburn and reducing antacid consumption. In addition, the ranitidine 75 mg regimen was superior to placebo in providing heartburn relief within 30 min of dosing that lasted for up to 12 h. Ranitidine 25 mg was observed to be statistically superior (P < 0.05) but not clinically different from placebo, as defined a priori, in providing heartburn relief. All treatments were well tolerated and adverse events occurred no more frequently with the ranitidine regimens than with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Ranitidine 75 mg provides prompt relief of heartburn that lasts for up to 12 h and has a safety profile comparable to that of placebo.     

Dose and concentration dependent effect of ranitidine on procainamide disposition and renal clearance in man.

The pharmacokinetics of oral procainamide (1 g) were investigated in six healthy subjects during chronic dosing with ranitidine 150 mg twice daily, and in three of the subjects when ranitidine 750 mg was administered over 12 h. The procainamide area under the plasma concentration-time curve was significantly (PQ0.02) increased by ranitidine (27.761.5 vs 31.561.8 mg l-1 h) with a significant reduction in renal clearance (379632 vs 309630 ml/min, PQ0.02). There was no change in half-life. The N-acetylprocainamide (NAPA) area under the plasma concentration-time curve was also significantly (PQ0.02) elevated by ranitidine (8.661.2 vs 9.761.3 mg 1-1 h) due to a reduction in renal clearance from 187630 to 168628 ml/min. The larger dose of ranitidine produced greater alterations in the procainamide and NAPA pharmacokinetics. Ranitidine reduced the absorption of procainamide by 10% and by 24% at the higher dose level. Two-hourly renal clearance values of procainamide were significantly (PQ0.05) reduced in the 2 to 10 h period and for NAPA between 0 to 6 and 8 to 10 h. The larger ranitidine dose reduced the renal clearances of procainamide and NAPA over the control period at each 2-hourly time period. The reductions in renal clearance are most likely mediated by competition for the renal tubular cationic secretory pathway. Clinical implications arising from this study suggest a reduction in procainamide dosage may be necessary in a small, select number of patients with high plasma ranitidine concentrations, e.g., the elderly; furthermore, failure of therapeutic response for some drugs may be due to ranitidine-induced impaired gastrointestinal absorption.     

Sodium bicarbonate enhances the absorption of propantheline in man

Summary Sodium bicarbonate (5 g) significantly increased the effects of simultaneously administered 45–60 mg propantheline on heart rate and saliva flow. An equivalent dose of sodium chloride (3.2 g) given with propantheline was without effect. This interaction is likely to affect patients taking both an antacid and an anticholinergic drug.     

Ranitidine 300 mg twice daily and 150 mg four-times daily are effective in healing erosive oesophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Ranitidine 150 mg q.d.s. is the currently recommended dosage in the United States for the treatment of erosive oesophagitis. To determine whether a higher dose of ranitidine administered less frequently would also be effective in healing erosive oesophagitis, we compared ranitidine 300 mg b.d. with ranitidine 150 mg q.d.s. in the treatment of erosive oesophagitis. METHODS: This multicentre, double- blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study conducted in the United States compared two dosages of ranitidine in 772 patients with endoscopically diagnosed erosive oesophagitis. Patients were treated with ranitidine 300 mg b.d., ranitidine 150 mg q.d.s. or placebo for up to 12 weeks. Endoscopies were repeated after 4, 8 and 12 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Ranitidine 300 mg b.d. was significantly more effective than placebo in healing erosive oesophagitis at weeks 8 and 12 (51 vs. 36% and 66 vs. 52%, respectively; P < or = 0.004). Significantly higher healing rates were also achieved with ranitidine 150 mg q.d.s. compared with placebo at 4, 8 and 12 weeks (37 vs. 21%, 62 vs. 36% and 77 vs. 52%, respectively; P < 0.001). Healing rates were significantly higher with ranitidine 150 mg q.d.s. than with ranitidine 300 mg b.d. at all scheduled endoscopies (P < or = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: Ranitidine 300 mg b.d. is effective in healing erosive oesophagitis and may be appropriate as an alternative dosage regimen to ranitidine 150 mg q.d.s. in some patients with erosive oesophagitis.     

Ranitidine does not affect gonadal function in man.

We studied the effect of ranitidine on gonadal function in 20 male subjects with chronic duodenal ulcer. Eleven were treated with ranitidine 150 mg twice daily for 3 months and 150 mg at night for 9 months, nine with placebo for 3 months. Similar to placebo, treatment with ranitidine did not influence basal serum concentrations of testosterone (T), luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and prolactin (PRL). No significant changes were found in sperm concentration, motility or morphology. Ranitidine does not affect gonadal function in man.     

Effects of the H2 receptor antagonist ranitidine on anterior pituitary hormone secretion in man

Summary The effect of an i.v. bolus of the H₂-receptor antagonist ranitidine 50, 100, 200 and 300 mg on serum levels of prolactin, TSH, GH, LH, FSH and cortisol was studied in 12 normal males. Ranitidine 200 and 300 mg significantly stimulated prolactin release without affecting any of the other hormones. Ranitidine 300 mg caused a rise in prolactin comparable to that observed following cimetidine 200 mg. The results show that ranitidine releases prolactin in man, but only when a large intravenous injection is given.