Randomized trial to determine the effect of nebivolol on mortality and cardiovascular hospital admission in elderly patients with heart failure (SENIORS).

AIMS: Large randomized trials have shown that beta-blockers reduce mortality and hospital admissions in patients with heart failure. The effects of beta-blockers in elderly patients with a broad range of left ventricular ejection fraction are uncertain. The SENIORS study was performed to assess effects of the beta-blocker, nebivolol, in patients >/=70 years, regardless of ejection fraction. METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomly assigned 2128 patients aged >/=70 years with a history of heart failure (hospital admission for heart failure within the previous year or known ejection fraction 35%), and 68% had a prior history of coronary heart disease. The mean maintenance dose of nebivolol was 7.7 mg and of placebo 8.5 mg. The primary outcome occurred in 332 patients (31.1%) on nebivolol compared with 375 (35.3%) on placebo [hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, 95% CI 0.74-0.99; P=0.039]. There was no significant influence of age, gender, or ejection fraction on the effect of nebivolol on the primary outcome. Death (all causes) occurred in 169 (15.8%) on nebivolol and 192 (18.1%) on placebo (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.71-1.08; P=0.21). CONCLUSION: Nebivolol, a beta-blocker with vasodilating properties, is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for heart failure in the elderly.     

Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition with perindopril on left ventricular remodeling and clinical outcome: results of the randomized Perindopril and Remodeling in Elderly with Acute Myocardial Infarction (PREAMI) Study

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors reduce mortality and remodeling after myocardial infarction in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. METHODS: Perindopril and Remodeling in Elderly With Acute Myocardial Infarction (PREAMI), a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter, placebo-controlled study, determined whether similar benefits occur in elderly postinfarction patients with preserved left ventricular function. A total of 1252 patients 65 years or older with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or higher and recent acute myocardial infarction were randomized to receive perindopril erbumine or placebo (8 mg/d) for 12 months. The combined primary end point was death, hospitalization for heart failure, or left ventricular remodeling. Secondary end points included cardiovascular death, hospitalization for reinfarction or angina, and revascularization. RESULTS: The primary end point occurred in 181 patients (35%) taking perindopril and 290 patients (57%) taking placebo, with a significant absolute risk reduction of 0.22 (95% confidence interval, 0.16 to 0.28; P<.001). A total of 126 patients (28%) and 226 patients (51%) in the perindopril and placebo groups, respectively, experienced remodeling. The mean increase in left ventricle end-diastolic volume was 0.7 mL with perindopril compared with 4.0 mL with placebo (P<.001). In the perindopril group, 40 deaths (6%) and 22 hospitalizations (4%) for heart failure occurred, whereas 37 deaths (6%) and 30 hospitalizations (5%) occurred in the placebo group. Treatment did not affect death, whereas the hospitalization rate for heart failure was slightly reduced (absolute risk reduction, 0.01; 95% confidence interval, -0.01 to 0.02). No treatment effect on other secondary end points was detected. CONCLUSION: We found that 1-year treatment with 8 mg/d of perindopril reduces progressive left ventricular remodeling that can occur even in the presence of small infarct size, but it was not associated with better clinical outcomes.     

Evaluation of the effects of aspirin combined with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND: Several studies have suggested that there may be an interaction between angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and aspirin in patients with congestive heart failure, such that their benefits are attenuated when used in combination. Whether this interaction exists in patients with coronary artery disease is not known. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients enrolled in two large trials, Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-I) and Evaluation in PTCA to Improve Long-Term Outcome with Abciximab GP IIb/IIIa Blockade (EPILOG), were stratified according to use of aspirin and ACE inhibitors on discharge from the hospital. In the EPILOG trial, left ventricular systolic function was assessed by contrast ventriculography. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 1 year. EPILOG patients, all of whom were receiving aspirin, were also examined for the combined endpoint of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. Stratified and multivariate analyses were used to adjust for baseline differences in patient characteristics. RESULTS: We studied 31,622 patients in the GUSTO-I trial and 2,619 patients in the EPILOG trial. There were 615 deaths among the GUSTO-I patients and 45 deaths among the EPILOG patients at 1 year. Unadjusted mortality was greater among patients treated with both ACE inhibitors and aspirin than among patients treated with aspirin alone (3.3% versus 1.6%, P <0.001 for GUSTO-I; and 3.7% versus 1.2%, P <0.001 for EPILOG). Similarly, the composite endpoint of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction was more frequent among EPILOG patients who were taking ACE inhibitors (6.3% versus 3.3%, P = 0. 001). After adjusting for confounders, combined use of aspirin and ACE inhibitors was associated with increased mortality in GUSTO-I patients (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1 to 4.3, P = 0.03) compared with aspirin alone. In EPILOG patients, after adjusting for clinical factors and extent of left ventricular dysfunction, the combination of aspirin and ACE inhibitors was associated with an increased risk of death (HR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.1 to 3.8, P = 0.02) and of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction (HR = 1.5, 95% CI: 1.1 to 2.5, P = 0.02) compared with aspirin alone. CONCLUSION: These observational findings suggest the possibility of an interaction between aspirin and ACE inhibitors among patients with ischemic heart disease. Further study of this issue is warranted.     

Atrial fibrillation predicts appropriate shocks in primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients.

AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is often present in patients with left ventricular dysfunction who receive an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). The purpose of this study was to investigate whether AF is associated with appropriate shocks and cardiovascular mortality in primary prevention ICD patients with left ventricular dysfunction. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 80 primary prevention ICD patients with left ventricular dysfunction and compared the outcome between patients with a history of AF (n=29) and patients with no history of AF (n=51). The primary endpoint was occurrence of appropriate shocks. Secondary endpoints were: (1) the composite of cardiovascular mortality/appropriate shocks; and (2) inappropriate shocks. During follow-up (median 8 months, range 1-60), patients with a history of AF more often received appropriate shocks than patients with no history of AF (24 vs. 6%, P=0.03). The composite endpoint of cardiovascular mortality/appropriate shocks was also more likely to occur in patients with a history of AF (34 vs. 12%, P=0.02). History of AF predicted appropriate shocks (HR 6.9, 95% CI 1.7-27.5, P=0.006) and the composite endpoint of cardiovascular mortality/appropriate shocks (adjusted HR 5.1, 95% CI 1.7-15.1, P=0.003). There were no differences in occurrence of inappropriate shocks. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that history of AF is associated with increased risk of appropriate shocks and cardiovascular mortality in primary prevention ICD patients with left ventricular dysfunction.     

Randomized trial of a nurse-administered, telephone-based disease management program for patients with heart failure

BACKGROUND: Heart failure is a common and important cause of morbidity and mortality. Disease management offers promise in reducing the need for hospitalization and improving quality of life for heart failure patients, but experimental data on the efficacy of such programs are limited. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 151 patients hospitalized with heart failure were randomized to usual care or scheduled telephone calls by specially trained nurses promoting self-management and guideline-based therapy as prescribed by primary physicians. Nurses also screened patients for heart failure exacerbations, which they managed with supplemental diuretics or by contacting the primary physician for instructions. Outcomes included time to hospital encounter, mortality, number and cost of hospitalizations, functional status, and satisfaction with care. Intervention patients had a longer time to encounter (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-0.96; P = .029), hospital readmission (HR = 0.67; CI 0.46-0.99; P = .045), and heart failure-specific readmission (HR = 0.62; CI 0.38-1.03; P = .063). The number of admissions, hospital days, and hospital costs were significantly lower during the first 6 months after intervention but not at 1 year. The intervention had little effect on functional status, mortality, and satisfaction with care. CONCLUSION: A nurse-administered, telephone-based disease management program delayed subsequent health care encounters, but had minimal impact on other outcomes.     

History of hypertension and eplerenone in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure

In the Eplerenone Post-Acute Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure Efficacy and Survival Study (n=6632), eplerenone-associated reduction in all-cause mortality was significantly greater in those with a history of hypertension (Hx-HTN). There were 4007 patients with Hx-HTN (eplerenone: n=1983) and 2625 patients without Hx-HTN (eplerenone: n=1336). Propensity scores for eplerenone use, separately calculated for patients with and without Hx-HTN, were used to assemble matched cohorts of 1838 and 1176 pairs of patients. In patients with Hx-HTN, all-cause mortality occurred in 18% of patients treated with placebo (rate, 1430/10 000 person-years) and 14% of patients treated with eplerenone (rate, 1058/10 000 person-years) during 2350 and 2457 years of follow-up, respectively (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.59 to 0.85; P<0.0001). Composite end point of cardiovascular hospitalization or cardiovascular mortality occurred in 33% of placebo-treated patients (3029/10 000 person-years) and 28% of eplerenone-treated patients (2438/10 000 person-years) with Hx-HTN (HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.72 to 0.94; P=0.003). In patients without Hx-HTN, eplerenone reduced heart failure hospitalization (HR: 73; 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.97; P=0.028) but had no effect on mortality (HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.72 to 1.15; P=0.435) or on the composite end point (HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.76 to 1.10; P=0.331). Eplerenone should, therefore, be prescribed to all of the post-acute myocardial infarction patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and heart failure regardless of Hx-HTN.     

The Treatment Effect of an ACE-Inhibitor Based Regimen with Perindopril in Relation to Beta-Blocker use in 29,463 Patients with Vascular Disease: a Combined Analysis of Individual Data of ADVANCE,EUROPA and PROGRESS Trials

Introduction

In everyday practice, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers are cornerstone treatments in patients with (cardio-)vascular disease. Clear data that evaluate the effects of the combination of these agents on morbidity and mortality are lacking.

Methods

In this retrospective pooled analysis of three large perindopril outcome trials (ADVANCE, EUROPA, PROGRESS), clinical outcomes were evaluated in 29,463 patients with vascular disease. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed in patients randomized to a perindopril-based regimen or placebo (treatment effect), and data were stratified according to background beta-blocker treatment. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and stroke.

Results

The cumulative incidence of the primary endpoint over mean follow-up of 4.0 years (Sd 1.0) was significantly lower in the beta-blocker/perindopril group (9.6%; 545/5700 patients) as compared to beta-blocker/placebo (11.8%; 676/5718 patients) (p < 0.01). Adding perindopril to existing beta-blocker treatment reduced the relative risk of the primary endpoint by 20% (hazard ratio (HR) 0.80; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71–0.90), non-fatal myocardial infarction by 23% (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.65–0.91), and all-cause mortality by 22% (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.68–0.88) as compared to placebo. Significant treatment benefit was not observed for stroke (HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.75–1.15). Significance was maintained for the primary endpoint and cardiovascular endpoints when data were further stratified by baseline hypertension. However, the mortality benefit was only observed in patients with hypertension with background beta-blocker use.

Conclusions

These data suggest that the beneficial cardioprotective effects of perindopril treatment are additive to the background beta-blockers use.

     

Multi-year follow-up of abciximab therapy in three randomized,placebo-controlled trials of percutaneous coronary revascularization

There is considerable evidence supporting the use of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors to reduce ischemic complications of percutaneous coronary revascularization. However, long-term follow-up has been limited.In three large-scale randomized trials that tested abciximab at a uniform bolus dose and 12-hour infusion against placebo, in a double-blind fashion, a total of 5799 patients had their long-term follow-up vital status determined at a minimum of 7 years (EPIC), 4.5 years (EPILOG), or 3 years (EPISTENT) after randomization (median, 4.8 years). The prespecified primary endpoint was all-cause mortality by intention-to-treat analysis at 3 years in patients randomly assigned to a common intervention. Follow-up for 5603 of the 5799 patients was 96.6% complete at 3 years; 320 deaths had occurred by that time.After 3 years of follow-up, mortality was 6.4% in the placebo groups and 5.0% in the abciximab groups (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63 to 0.98; P = 0.03). A similar reduction in mortality was observed on an intention-to-treat basis when all follow-up information was utilized after a median of 4.8 years of follow-up (n = 652 deaths): 12.6% in the placebo groups and 10.2% in the abciximab groups (HR = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.70 to 0.96; P = 0.01).Abciximab treatment reduced all-cause mortality by about 20% during long-term follow-up after percutaneous coronary intervention. The findings were similar in magnitude and consistent in direction for each of the three trials, and the absolute survival benefit appeared to increase over time. Brief intervention with this monoclonal antibody during percutaneous coronary revascularization is associated with significant improvement of long-term survival.     

The effect of perindopril on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes in the EUROPA study: results from the PERSUADE substudy.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor perindopril on cardiovascular events in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 1502 diabetic patients with known coronary artery disease and without heart failure of 12 218 overall in the EUropean trial on Reduction Of cardiac events with Perindopril in stable coronary Artery (EUROPA) disease were randomized in a double-blinded manner to perindopril 8 mg once daily or placebo. Follow-up was for a median of 4.3 years. The primary end point was cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and resuscitated cardiac arrest. Perindopril treatment was associated with a non-significant reduction in the primary endpoint in the diabetic population, 12.6 vs. 15.5%, relative risk reduction 19% [(95% CI, -7 to 38%), P=0.13]. This was of similar relative magnitude to the 20% risk reduction observed in the main EUROPA population. CONCLUSION: Perindopril tends to reduce major cardiovascular events in diabetic patients with coronary disease in addition to other preventive treatments and the trend towards reduction was of a similar relative magnitude to that observed the general population with coronary artery disease.     

F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging-assisted management of patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction and suspected coronary disease: a randomized, controlled trial (PARR-2).

OBJECTIVES: We conducted a randomized trial to assess the effectiveness of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)-assisted management in patients with severe ventricular dysfunction and suspected coronary disease. BACKGROUND: Such patients may benefit from revascularization, but have significant perioperative morbidity and mortality. F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET can detect viable myocardium that might recover after revascularization. METHODS: Included were patients with severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and suspected coronary disease being considered for revascularization, heart failure, or transplantation work-ups or in whom PET was considered potentially useful. Patients were stratified according to recent angiography or not, then randomized to management assisted by FDG PET (n = 218) or standard care (n = 212). The primary outcome was the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or recurrent hospital stay for cardiac cause, within 1 year. RESULTS: At 1 year, the cumulative proportion of patients who had experienced the composite event was 30% (PET arm) versus 36% (standard arm) (relative risk 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59 to 1.14; p = 0.16). The hazard ratio (HR) for the composite outcome, PET versus standard care, was 0.78 (95% CI 0.58 to 1.1; p = 0.15); for patients that adhered to PET recommendations for revascularization, revascularization work-up, or neither, HR = 0.62 (95% CI 0.42 to 0.93; p = 0.019); in those without recent angiography, for cardiac death, HR = 0.4 (95% CI 0.17 to 0.96; p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: This study did not demonstrate a significant reduction in cardiac events in patients with LV dysfunction and suspected coronary disease for FDG PET-assisted management versus standard care. In those who adhered to PET recommendations and in patients without recent angiography, significant benefits were observed. The utility of FDG PET is best realized in this subpopulation and when adherence to recommendations can be achieved.     

Uric acid and other renal function parameters in patients with stable angina pectoris participating in the ACTION trial: impact of nifedipine GITS (gastro-intestinal therapeutic system) and relation to outcome

BACKGROUND: Little data is available concerning the prognostic implications of renal function abnormalities, their evolution over time and the effects of nifedipine on such abnormalities in patients with stable angina pectoris. METHODS: The previously published ACTION trial compared long-acting nifedipine GITS 60 mg once daily to placebo among 7,665 patients. Standard laboratory tests including creatinine and uric acid were assessed at baseline, after 6 months, 2 and 4 years, and at the end of follow-up. We assessed the impact of nifedipine on markers of renal dysfunction and determined whether evidence of renal failure alters the impact of nifedipine on the clinical outcome of patients with stable angina. RESULTS: Uric acid was not while creatinine level and estimated creatinine clearance were potent conditionally independent predictors of total mortality and of cardiovascular clinical events. Relative to placebo, nifedipine reduced 6-month uric acid levels by 3% (P < 0.001) of the baseline value. This difference was maintained during long-term follow-up, was present both in normotensives and in hypertensives, and was not explained by differences in diuretic therapy or allopurinol use. Nifedipine had no effect on the occurrence of clinical renal failure. Relative to placebo, the effects of nifedipine on cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88-1.17], any stroke or transient ischaemic attack (HR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.60-0.88), new overt heart failure (HR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.55-0.95), and the need for any coronary procedure (HR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.75-0.88) were consistent across strata of markers of renal dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that, in patients with stable angina, nifedipine reduces uric acid levels and does not affect other markers of renal dysfunction. Renal dysfunction does not alter the effects of nifedipine on clinical outcome.     

Value of exercise capacity and heart rate recovery in older people

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prognostic value in older adults of two predictors of mortality: impaired functional capacity and an attenuated heart rate recovery. SETTING: Academic medical center. DESIGN: Prospective study with mean 3.7 years follow-up. PARTICIPANTS: Seven thousand three hundred fifty-four adults aged 65 and older consecutively referred for exercise testing between 1990 and 1999. Patients with heart failure, valvular disease, atrial fibrillation, and pacemakers were excluded. MEASUREMENTS: The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Impaired functional capacity was defined as the peak exercise workload in the lowest quintile of metabolic equivalents achieved according to prespecified strata of age and sex. Heart rate recovery was defined as the fall in heart rate during the first minute after exercise and was abnormal if 12 or fewer beats per minute, except for patients undergoing stress echocardiography, in which case 18 or fewer beats per minute was abnormal. RESULTS: There were 842 deaths. Patients with impaired functional capacity were at increased risk for death (23% vs 9%, hazard ratio (HR) = 2.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.2-3.1, P <.0001) as were patients with an abnormal heart rate recovery (17% vs 9%, HR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.8-2.3, P <.0001). After adjusting for age, sex, coronary history, and other confounders, impaired functional capacity (adjusted HR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.8-2.4) and an abnormal heart rate recovery (adjusted HR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.3-1.7) independently predicted death. No interactions between these two variables with age were noted. CONCLUSIONS: In older patients, impaired functional capacity and heart rate recovery were independent predictors of death.     

Effects of metoprolol CR/XL on mortality and hospitalizations in patients with heart failure and history of hypertension

BACKGROUND: We describe the effect of controlled-release/extended-release (CR/XL) metoprolol succinate once daily on mortality and hospitalizations among patients with a history of hypertension complicated by chronic systolic heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled 3,991 patients with chronic heart failure of New York Heart Association functional class II-IV with an ejection fraction of < or = 0.40, stabilized with optimum standard therapy, in a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study. A total of 1,747 patients (44%) had a history of hypertension; 871 were randomized to receive metoprolol CR/XL and 876 to receive placebo. Treatment with metoprolol CR/XL compared with placebo resulted in a significant reduction in total mortality (relative risk [RR], 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.84; P =.0022), mainly because of reductions in sudden death (RR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.33-0.79; P =.0022) and mortality from worsening heart failure (RR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.25-0.99; P =.042). Total number of hospitalizations for worsening heart failure was reduced by 30% in the metoprolol CR/XL group compared with placebo (P =.015). Metoprolol CR/XL was well tolerated: 12% fewer patients withdrew from study medication (all-cause) compared with placebo (P =.048). CONCLUSIONS: A subgroup analysis of MERIT-HF shows that patients with heart failure and a history of hypertension received a similar benefit from metoprolol CR/XL treatment as all patients included in the total study.     

免疫治疗相关性甲状腺功能异常与不可切除/晚期肝细胞癌患者预后改善相关

摘要 目的：探讨免疫治疗相关性甲状腺功能异常与不可切除/晚期肝细胞癌（HCC）患者预后改善的相关性。方法：回顾性分析45例接受免疫检查点抑制剂（ICIs）治疗的不可切除/晚期HCC患者。根据ICIs治疗过程中是否出现免疫相关性甲状腺功能异常分为甲状腺功能正常组（28例）和异常组（17例）,比较2组患者的预后和免疫应答情况,主要终点指标为中位总生存期（OS）、无进展生存期（PFS）,次要终点指标为疾病控制率（DCR）。结果：所有患者的中位OS、PFS分别为10.8个月（95% CI ：3.0~18.6）和5.0个月（95% CI ：3.0~12.2）。正常组中位OS为5.8个月（95% CI ：3.7~7.9）,异常组中位OS尚未达到（ P =0.026）。异常组中位PFS长于正常组（8.2个月 vs. 3.1个月, P =0.011）,DCR高于正常组（52.9% vs. 21.5%,P =0.030）。多因素Cox回归分析显示,甲状腺功能异常是达到6个月OS（ HR=0.213,95%CI ：0.048~0.944, P =0.042）和PFS（ HR=0.383,95%CI：0.151~0.967,P =0.042）的独立影响因素;甲状腺功能异常（ HR=0.403 ,95%CI：0.185~0.877,P =0.022）、基线无大血管侵犯（MVI）（ HR=2.848,95%CI：1.406~5.768,P =0.004）、Child-Pugh A级（ HR=2.404,95%：1.099~5.255,P =0.028）与12个月PFS相关。结论：免疫治疗相关性甲状腺功能异常的不可切除/晚期HCC患者预期生存和免疫应答效果更佳。治疗期间出现甲状腺功能异常、基线无MVI、Child-Pugh A级与患者预后改善相关。     

Does Conversion and Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation Enhance Survival in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction? Evidence from the Danish Investigations of Arrhythmia and Mortality ON Dofetilide/(DIAMOND) Study

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is a common arrhythmia in patients with left ventricular dysfunction associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The present study investigated the potential of dofetilide to restore and maintain sinus rhythm in patients with left ventricular dysfunction, which might reduce mortality and hospitalizations. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the Danish Investigations of Arrhythmia and Mortality ON Dofetilide (DIAMOND) studies, 506 patients were in atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter (AFl) at baseline. Over the course of study, cardioversion occurred in 148 (59%) dofetilide- and 86 (34%) placebo-treated patients. In these patients, the probability of maintaining sinus rhythm for 1 year was 79% with dofetilide versus 42% with placebo ( P < 0.001). Dofetilide had no effect on all-cause mortality, but restoration and maintenance of sinusrhythm (independent of study treatment) was associated with a significant reduction in mortality (risk ratio [RR], 0.44; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.64; P < 0.0001). In addition, dofetilide therapy was associated with a significantly lower risk ratio versus placebo for either all-cause (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.89; P < or = 0.005) or congestive heart failure (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.93; P < or = 0.02) rehospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Dofetilide is safe and increases the probability of obtaining and maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with structural heart disease. The present study suggests that restoration of sinus rhythm--on placebo or dofetilide--is associated with improved survival.     

Safety and efficacy of soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators in patients with heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND The utility of novel oral soluble guanylate cyclase(s GC) stimulators(vericiguat and riociguat), in patients with reduced or preserved ejection fraction heart failure(HFr EF/HFp EF) is currently unclear.AIM To determine the efficacy and safety of s GC stimulators in HF patients.METHODS Multiple databases were searched to identify relevant randomized controlled trials(RCTs). Data on the safety and efficacy of s GC stimulators were compared using relative risk ratio(RR) on a random effect model.RESULTS Six RCTs, comprising 5604 patients(2801 in s GC stimulator group and 2803 placebo group) were included. The primary endpoint(a composite of cardiovascular mortality and first HF-related hospitalization) was significantly reduced in patients receiving s GC stimulators compared to placebo [RR 0.92, 95% confidence interval(CI): 0.85-0.99, P = 0.02]. The incidence of total HF-related hospitalizations were also lower in s GC group(RR 0.91, 95%CI: 0.86-0.96, P = 0.0009), however, s GC stimulators had no impact on all-cause mortality(RR 0.96, 95%CI: 0.86-1.07, P = 0.45) or cardiovascular mortality(RR 0.94, 95%CI: 0.83-1.06,P= 0.29). The overall safety endpoint(a composite of hypotension and syncope) was also similar between the two groups(RR 1.50, 95%CI: 0.93-2.42, P = 0.10). By contrast, a stratified subgroup analysis adjusted by type of s GC stimulator and HF(vericiguat vs riociguat and HFr EF vs HFp EF) showed near identical rates for all safety and efficacy endpoints between the two groups at a mean follow-up of 19 wk. For the primary composite endpoint, the number needed to treat was 35, the number needed to harm was 44.CONCLUSION The use of vericiguat and riociguat in conjunction with standard HF therapy, shows no benefit in terms of decreasing HF-related hospitalizations or mortality.     

Clinical predictors of chronic chagasic myocarditis progression

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Previous prognostic studies of Chagas' disease have focused on mortality associated with end-stage cardiopathy (i.e., heart failure). Our aim was to identify indicators of progression in early-stage Chagas' heart disease. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The study included 856 patients with 3 positive anti-Trypanosoma cruzi test results. Those with heart failure were excluded. Patients were divided into 3 clinical groups: those without heart disease (Group I); those with heart disease but without left ventricular enlargement (Group II); and those with left ventricular enlargement but without heart failure (Group III). The endpoint was progression to a more severe clinical stage or death due to cardiovascular disease. A Cox regression model was used to derive a clinical risk score from clinical, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic variables. RESULTS: At study entry, the patients' mean age was 43.7 years. They were followed up for a mean of 8 years. The following were predictors of heart disease progression: age at entry (HR=1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.07; P<.001), left ventricular systolic diameter (HR=1.06; 95% CI, 1.04-1.09; P<.001), intraventricular conduction abnormalities (HR=1.85; 95% CI, 1.02-3.36; P=.04), and sustained ventricular tachycardia (HR=3.97; 95% CI, 1.65-9.58; P=.002). Treatment with benznidazole reduced the risk of progression (HR=0.40; 95% CI, 0.23-0.72; P=.002). The devised clinical risk score was effective in stratifying the likelihood of cardiopathy progression. CONCLUSIONS: Specific clinical indicators and a derived clinical risk score can be used to predict the progression of chronic chagasic myocarditis in patients without heart failure.     

Possible differential benefits of edetate disodium in post-myocardial infarction patients with diabetes treated with different hypoglycemic strategies in the Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy (TACT)

BackgroundThe NIH-funded Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy (TACT) randomized 1708 stable patients age ≥50 who were ≥6 months post myocardial infarction to 40 infusions of an edetate disodium-based regimen or placebo. In 633 patients with diabetes, edetate disodium significantly reduced the primary composite endpoint of mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for angina (hazard ratio [HR] 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44–0.79, p < 0.001). The principal secondary endpoint of a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke was also reduced (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.39–0.91, p = 0.017). It is unknown if the treatment effect differs by diabetes therapy.MethodsWe grouped the subset of 633 patients with diabetes according to glucose-lowering therapy at time of randomization. The log-rank test was used to compare active therapy versus placebo. All treatment comparisons were performed using 2-sided significance tests at the significance level of 0.05 and were as randomized. Relative risks were expressed as HR with associated 95% CI, calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model.ResultsThere were 162 (25.7%) patients treated with insulin; 301 (47.5%) with oral hypoglycemics only; and 170 (26.8%) receiving no pharmacologic treatment for diabetes. Patients on insulin reached the primary endpoint more frequently than patients on no pharmacologic treatment [61 (38%) vs 49 (29%) (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.07–2.27, p = 0.022)] or oral hypoglycemics [61 (38%) vs 87 (29%) (HR 1.46, 1.05–2.03, p = 0.024)]. The primary endpoint occurred less frequently with edetate disodium based therapy versus placebo in patients on insulin [19 (26%) vs 42 (48%) (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.25–0.74, log-rank p = 0.002)], marginally in patients on oral hypoglycemics [38 (25%) vs 49 (34%) (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.43–1.01, log-rank p = 0.041)], and no significant difference in patients not treated with a pharmacologic therapy [23 (25%) vs 26 (34%) (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.39–1.20, log-rank p = 0.225)]. The interaction between randomized intravenous treatment and type of diabetes therapy was not statistically significant (p = 0.203).ConclusionsEdetate disodium treatment in stable, post-myocardial infarction patients with diabetes suggests that patients on insulin therapy at baseline may accrue the greatest benefit.Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00044213?term=TACT&rank=7 identifierTrial to Assess Chelation Therapy (TACT), NCT00044213.     

Metabolic treatment with L-carnitine in acute anterior ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Administration of L-carnitine in patients with anterior acute myocardial infarction (AMI) prevents left ventricular remodeling. Current study was aimed to assess the effect of L-carnitine administration on mortality and heart failure in patients with anterior AMI. METHODS: CEDIM 2 trial was a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial planned to enroll 4,000 patients with acute anterior AMI. The trial was interrupted after the enrolment of 2,330 patients because of the lower than expected enrolment rate. The primary end point was a composite of death and heart failure at 6 months; 5-day mortality was the secondary end point. RESULTS: During the 6-month follow-up, the primary end-point was not significantly different between the L-carnitine and placebo group (9.2 vs. 10.5%, p = 0.27). A reduction in mortality was seen in the L-carnitine arm on day 5 (secondary end-point) from randomization (HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.37-0.98, p = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: In CEDIM 2 trial L-carnitine therapy led to a reduction in early mortality (secondary end-point) without affecting the risk of death and heart failure at 6 months in patients with anterior AMI, leading to a non-significant finding with respect to the primary end-point.