Expression of folate sensitive and aphidicolin induced chromosomal fragile sites in familial neuroblastoma

The expression of folate sensitive and aphidicolin induced fragile sites in the blood lymphocyte chromosomes of affected and unaffected members from 2 neuroblastoma families were studied. The subjects included 4 neuroblastoma patients, and 9 of their clinically healthy first degree relatives and corresponding number of age and sex matched controls. Lymphocytes cultured in folate deprived culture medium showed rare fragile sites at band p13.1 of chromosome 1, in a frequency of 3%-5% in all the 4 neuroblastoma patients. In aphidicolin treated cultures, the patients and unaffected members in neuroblastoma families, showed hypersensitivity to aphidicolin, as evidenced by the significant increase in percentage of aberration/cell (ab/c) and damaged cells (dc), over that of controls (P < 0.01). Aphidicolin induced fragile sites were more pronounced in chromosomes 1 and 2. A larger number of subjects have to be studied to prove whether altered fragile site expression may be a cytogenetic evidence for an individual or familial cancer predisposing genetic constitution.     

Are fragile sites "hot-spots": a causative factor in tumor biology

Genomic integrity of the cancer cell is doubt-full because of fragility on chromosome. Fragile--sites are non-randomly distributed on human genome prone to form gaps or breaks at either pre/or metaphase chromosome arise when cells are exposed to a perturbation of DNA replication process. Cancer cells commonly show various form of "hot spots" including point mutation, chromosome copy number and translocation involving specific gene mutation but the genetic diversity of fragile sites are still not clear. The chromosomal fragile sites (rare & common fragile sites) make the cancer cells not only susceptible to genomic instability but also contribute the process of malignancy due to expansions of microsatellite CGG or AT rich minisatellite. Fragile sites have been implicated due to inter chromosomal amplification events by initiation breakage - fusion cycles. The mechanisms behind these changes give raise to new insight the cytogenetic manifestation of oncogenesis. Fragile sites loci are associated with activation of oncogenesis during cell--cycle analysis. However, these mutations at fragile sites loci might have play a causative or functional role in tumor biology. The topography organization and informatics complexity of the fragile sites remained unexplored due to lack of systematic approach towards molecular cloning of the fragile sites DNA sequences and specific models as not are under taken. The information regarding mode of inheritance of fragile sites are still lacking but the first degree relative specially young proband and maternal side having variable prevalence in different population could be uses as suitable marker for determining genetic predisposition to cancer. This comprehensive review of fragile sites in tumor biology probably helpful to explore to understand the molecular mechanism of carcinogenesis or tumorgenesis.     

Cloning of genetically tagged chromosome break sequences reveals new fragile sites at 6p21 and 13q22

Fragile sites are specific genomic loci that are especially prone to chromosome breakage. For the human genome there are 31 rare fragile sites and 88 common fragile sites listed in the National Center for Biotechnology Information database; however, the exact number remains unknown. In this study, unstable DNA sequences, which have been previously tagged with a marker gene, were cloned and provided starting points for the characterization of two aphidicolin inducible common fragile sites. Mapping of these unstable regions with six-color fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed two new fragile sites at 6p21 and 13q22, which encompass genomic regions of 9.3 and 3.1 Mb, respectively. According to the fragile site nomenclature they were consequently entitled as FRA6H and FRA13E. Both identified regions are known to be associated with recurrent aberrations in malignant and nonmalignant disorders. It is conceivable that these fragile sites result in genetic damage that might contribute to cancer phenotypes such as osteosarcoma, breast and prostate cancer.     

The fragile histidine triad/common chromosome fragile site 3B locus and repair-deficient cancers

In various studies of sporadic breast cancers, 40-70% were strongly positive for fragile histidine triad (Fhit) protein expression, whereas only 18% of BRCA2 mutant breast cancers demonstrated strong Fhit expression, suggesting that the BRCA2 repair function may be necessary to retain intact fragile common chromosome fragile site 3B(FRA3B)/FHITloci. In the current study, 22 breast tumors with deleterious BRCA1 mutations were analyzed for Fhit expression by immunohistochemistry in a case-control matched pair analysis. Loss of Fhit expression was significantly more frequent in the BRCA1 cancers compared with sporadic breast tumors (9% Fhit positive versus 68% Fhit positive), suggesting that the BRCA1 pathway is also important in protecting the FRA3B/FHIT locus from damage. To investigate the relationship between repair gene deficiencies and induction of chromosome fragile sites in vitro, we have analyzed the frequency of aphidicolin induction of chromosome gaps and breaks in PMS2-, BRCA1-, MSH2-, MLH1-, FHIT-, and TP53-deficient cell lines. Each of the repair-deficient cell lines showed elevated expression of chromosome gaps and breaks, consistent with the proposal that proteins involved in mismatch and double-strand break repair are important in maintaining the integrity of common fragile regions. Correspondingly, genes at common fragile sites may sustain elevated levels of DNA damage in cells with deficient DNA repair proteins such as those mutated in several familial cancer syndromes.     

Depletion of CHK1, but not CHK2, induces chromosomal instability and breaks at common fragile sites

Common fragile sites are specific regions of the genome that form gaps and breaks on metaphase chromosomes when DNA synthesis is partially inhibited. Fragile sites and their associated genes show frequent deletions and other rearrangements in cancer cells, and may be indicators of DNA replication stress early in tumorigenesis. We have previously shown that the DNA damage response proteins ATR, BRCA1 and FANCD2 play critical roles in maintaining the stability of fragile site regions. To further elucidate the pathways regulating fragile site stability, we have investigated the effects of depletion of the cell cycle checkpoint kinases, CHK1 and CHK2 on common fragile site stability in human cells. We demonstrate that both CHK1 and CHK2 are activated following treatment of cells with low doses of aphidicolin that induce fragile site breakage. Furthermore, we show that depletion of CHK1, but not CHK2, using short-interfering RNA (siRNA) leads to highly destabilized chromosomes and specific common fragile site breakage. In many cells, CHK1 depletion resulted in extensive chromosome fragmentation, which was distinct from endonucleolytic cleavage commonly associated with apoptosis. These findings demonstrate a critical role for the CHK1 kinase in regulating chromosome stability, and in particular, common fragile site stability.     

Instability of chromosome 17 and the p53 locus in non-familial colorectal cancer with multiple primary malignancies.

Recently, two different mechanisms of genetic instability have been demonstrated in the carcinogenesis of colorectal cancer. Microsatellite instability is an important genetic event for carcinogenesis in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, proximal colon cancer, and multiple colorectal carcinoma. To examine the association among chromosomal instability and multiple primary malignancies (MPM) in colorectal cancer, fluorescence in situ hybridization using a chromosome 17-specific probe, p53 cosmid probe, and/or an alpha satellite DNA probe was performed in 184 patients with colorectal cancer. The proportion of aneusomy 17 in MPM was significantly higher than that of single cancers (SC) (46.1+/-8.0% and 39.0+/-10.3%, respectively; p<0.01). Multiple numerical aberrations of chromosome 17 in MPM occurred more often than those of SC (64.3% and 22.9%, respectively; p<0.01). The mean frequency of p53 deletion was also higher in MPM (70.4+/-16.7%) compared with SC (53.4+/-18.1%, p<0.05). The frequency of chromosome 17 translocation was significantly greater in tumors with MPM (4/6; 67%) than in SC (3/23; 13%, p<0.05). The frequency of p53 locus translocation was also significantly greater in tumors with MPM (4/6; 67%) than in SC (0/23; 0%, p<0.01). These results suggested that numerical and structural aberrations of chromosome 17 and the p53 locus are important genetic events associated with carcinogenesis in non-familial colorectal cancer with MPM.     

Preferential integration of a transfected marker gene into spontaneously expressed fragile sites of a breast cancer cell line

Common fragile sites are non-randomly distributed unstable chromosomal regions thought to be hot spots for recombination. They appear as gaps, breaks and triradial figures when cells are cultured under conditions that inhibit replication or repair of DNA. The removal of replication-inhibitory challenges is followed by repair activation to restore the DNA damage at the fragile site. The breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-436 has a spontaneous and non-random expression pattern of fragile sites that appear to be related to the complex pattern of chromosomal rearrangements. The high frequency of which fragile sites are spontaneously activated should make MDA-MB-436 cells a powerful tool to study in greater detail the DNA sequences of a multiplicity of fragile sites. Here, we have explored if the DNA at spontaneously activated fragile sites in MDA-MB-436 cells can be genetically tagged by the repair-mediated insertion of an exogenously supplied drug resistance gene. The cells were transfected with pSV2Neo, stably transfected clones were selected with neomycin, and the sites of pSV2Neo integration were determined by fluorescent in situ hybridization. Eighty-eight of 100 isolated clones had a non-random distribution of a total of 112 pSV2Neo integrations. Of these, 95 integrations (85%) coincide with the position at which non-random gaps and breaks appear in the MDA-MB-436 cells. Forty-nine (44%) of the 112 integrations appeared to be at position of known fragile sites, 46 (41%) were at the non-random chromosomal sites not previously described as "true" fragile sites. It is possible, however, that these non-random instabilities signal of genomic regions equivalent to fragile sites, that either have not previously been detected due to low level expression or that are activated in a tissue- or cell-type-specific manner. Collectively, our results show a preferential integration of exogenous DNA into fragile sites and other non-random regions of high genomic instability in MDA-MB-436 cells. This approach has provided a platform for the efficient targeted cloning and characterization of a substantial number of both common fragile sites and other non-random instability regions possibly related to breast cancer, and possibly also to other types of cancer.     

Identification of unstable sequences within the common fragile site at 3p14.2: implications for the mechanism of deletions within fragile histidine triad gene/common fragile site at 3p14.2 in tumors

The FRA3B, at 3p14.2, lies within the fragile histidine triad (FHIT) gene and is the most highly expressed of the common fragile sites observed when DNA replication is perturbed by aphidicolin. Common fragile sites are highly unstable regions of the genome. Large intragenic deletions within FHIT, localized within the FRA3B sequences, have been identified in a variety of tumor cells. To characterize the FRA3B deletions in tumor cells and identify FRA3B sequences that are required for fragile site induction, we used microcell-mediated chromosome transfer to isolate hybrid cell clones that retain chromosome 3 homologues with various deletions within FRA3B. Detailed molecular mapping of the FHIT/FRA3B locus in the resultant hybrid cells revealed a complex pattern of instability within FRA3B. Each tumor cell line contained multiple chromosome 3 homologues with variable deletion patterns, often with discontinuous deletions, suggesting that the process of breakage and repair within FRA3B is an ongoing one. By comparing the approximate location of the breakpoints in the hybrid clones, we identified 11 recurring breakpoint/repair regions within the FRA3B. A comparison of the frequency of breaks/gaps within FRA3B in the hybrid clones with various deletions of FRA3B sequences revealed that the loss of FRA3B sequences does not reduce the overall rate of breakage and instability within the remaining FRA3B sequences. The majority of breaks occurred in the proximal portion of the FRA3B, in a 300-kb interval between exon 4 and the proximal 50 kb of intron 5. Our observations suggest that there is no single sequence within the FRA3B that influences breakage or recombination within this region; however, we cannot rule out the presence of multiple "hot spots" within the FHIT/FRA3B locus. Together, the results suggest that factors other than the DNA sequence per se are responsible for the formation of DNA breaks/gaps.     

FRA1E common fragile site breaks map within a 370kilobase pair region and disrupt the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene (DPYD)

Common fragile sites represent components of normal chromosome structure that are particularly prone to breakage under replication stress. Although the cytogenetic locations of 88 common fragile sites are listed in the Genome database, the DNA at only 14 of them has been defined and characterized at the molecular level. Here, we identify the precise genomic position of the common fragile site FRA1E, mapped to the chromosomal band 1p21.2, and characterize the genetic complexity of the fragile DNA sequence. We show that FRA1E extends over 370kb within the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) gene, which genomically spans approximately 840kb. The 185kb region of the highest fragility, which accounts for 86% of all observed breaks at FRA1E, encompasses the central part of DPYD including exons 13-16. DPYD encodes dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), which is the first and rate-limiting enzyme in a three-step metabolic pathway involved in degradation of the pyrimidine bases uracil and thymine. Deficiency in human DPD is associated with autosomal recessive disease, thymine-uraciluria, and with severe 5-fluorouracil toxicity in cancer patients. To which extent the disruption of the DPYD gene by the fragile site break is only transient, followed by DNA repair to restore the original structure, or occasionally may result in genomic damage associated with human disease remains to be determined.     

Instability at the FRA8I common fragile site disrupts the genomic integrity of the KIAA0146, CEBPD and PRKDC genes in colorectal cancer

Specific patterns of genomic aberrations have been associated with different types of malignancies. In colorectal cancer, losses of chromosome arm 8p and gains of chromosome arm 8q are among the most common chromosomal rearrangements, suggesting that the centromeric portion of chromosome 8 is particularly sensitive to breakage. Genomic alterations frequently occur in the early stages of tumorigenesis at specific genomic regions known as common fragile sites (cFSs). CFSs represent parts of the normal chromosome structure that are prone to breakage under replication stress. In this study, we identified the genomic location of FRA8I, spanning 530 kb at 8q11.21 and assessed the composition of the fragile DNA sequence. FRA8I encompasses KIAA0146, a large protein-coding gene with yet unknown function, as well as CEBPD and part of PRKDC, two genes encoding proteins involved in tumorigenesis in a variety of cancers. We show that FRA8I is unstable in lymphocytes and epithelial cells, displaying similar expression rates. We examined copy number alteration patterns within FRA8I in a panel of 25 colorectal cancer cell lines and surveyed publically available profiles of 56 additional colorectal cancer cell lines. Combining these data shows that focal recombination events disrupt the genomic integrity of KIAA0146 and neighboring cFS genes in 12.3% of colorectal cancer cell lines. Moreover, data analysis revealed evidence that KIAA0146 is a translocation partner of the immunoglobulin heavy chain gene in recurrent t(8;14)(q11;q32) translocations in a subset of patients with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Our data molecularly describe a region of enhanced chromosomal instability in the human genome and point to a role of the KIAA0146 gene in tumorigenesis.     

Alteration of the fragile histidine triad gene early in carcinogenesis: an update

An association between common chromosome fragile sites and frequent chromosomal deletions in cancer has been observed and led to the hypothesis that genes at fragile sites may play a role in tumor development. In 1996, the human fragile histidine triad gene, FHIT, was identified by positional cloning at 3p14.2, a chromosomal region spanning the carcinogen-sensitive, common fragile site FRA3B. FHIT gene is lost and inactivated in a large fraction of tumors and early in carcinogenesis. A group of ancestral cancerous cells that carry FHIT alterations, expanding in succeeding cell generations, exhibits a hallmark in carcinogenesis scenario.     

Chromosomal 20q gain in the DNA diploid component of aneuploid colorectal carcinomas

The order of appearance of different genetic aberrations during the shift from diploidy/near-diploidy to aneuploidy in colorectal cancers is not yet clear. We studied genetic alterations in flow cytometrically-sorted DNA diploid and corresponding aneuploid epithelial cell populations from each of 20 colorectal tumors using comparative genomic hybridization, FISH, and PCR. Analysis of the 19 cases in which aberrations were found in the flow-sorted diploid population indicated that large-scale aneuploidization in colorectal cancer was preceded by amplification of oncogene(s) localized to chromosome 20q13.2 and by KRAS mutations, but not by TP53 deletions or losses of large chromosomal regions such as 4q, 8p and 18q.     

Chromosomal fragile site FRA16D and DNA instability in cancer

It has been proposed that common aphidicolin-inducible fragile sites, in general, predispose to specific chromosomal breakage associated with deletion, amplification, and/or translocation in certain forms of cancer. Although this appears to be the case for the fragile site FRA3B and may be the case for FRA7G, it is not yet clear whether this association is a general property of this class of fragile site. The major aim of the present study was to determine whether the FRA16D chromosomal fragile site locus has a role to play in predisposing DNA sequences within and adjacent to the fragile site to DNA instability (such as deletion or translocation), which could lead to or be associated with neoplasia. We report the localization of FRA16D within a contig of cloned DNA and demonstrate that this fragile site coincides with a region of homozygous deletion in a gastric adenocarcinoma cell line and is bracketed by translocation breakpoints in multiple myeloma, as reported previously (Chesi, M., et al., Blood, 91: 4457-4463, 1998). Therefore, given similar findings at the FRA3B and FRA7G fragile sites, it is likely that common aphidicolin-inducible fragile sites exhibit the general property of localized DNA instability in cancer cells.     

Mutagen sensitivity and cancer susceptibility. Report of a cancer-prone family

A cancer-prone family was studied to determine if certain chromosomal abnormalities might have predisposed members to develop diverse types of malignancies. The types of neoplasia that occurred in this family included cancers of the breast and stomach, multiple myeloma, dermatofibrosarcoma, Wilm's tumor, and leukemia; the latter three occurred in children at an early age. Peripheral lymphocytes from 13 family members were examined for the presence of constitutional chromosomal abnormalities, fragile sites, and mutagen sensitivity. Our data shows that all living members of this family who had cancers were hypersensitive to chromosome breakage induced by bleomycin. In contrast, neither constitutional chromosomal abnormality nor heritable type of folate-sensitive fragile site was observed in any member. The above findings suggest that genetic defects affecting chromosomal breakage and repair may be contributing factors for cancer development in several members of this family.     

Chromosome fragile sites in patients with multiple primary tumors and familial forms of breast cancer]

An analysis was carried out of chromosomal site-fragility in patients with primary multiple tumors and familial breast cancer. A possible correlation is discussed between fragile sites, breakpoints in chromosome rearrangements in cancer patients and the localization of oncogenes mapped in chromosomal regions involved in said rearrangements.     

DNA copy number amplification profiling of human neoplasms

DNA copy number amplifications activate oncogenes and are hallmarks of nearly all advanced tumors. Amplified genes represent attractive targets for therapy, diagnostics and prognostics. To investigate DNA amplifications in different neoplasms, we performed a bibliomics survey using 838 published chromosomal comparative genomic hybridization studies and collected amplification data at chromosome band resolution from more than 4500 cases. Amplification profiles were determined for 73 distinct neoplasms. Neoplasms were clustered according to the amplification profiles, and frequently amplified chromosomal loci (amplification hot spots) were identified using computational modeling. To investigate the site specificity and mechanisms of gene amplifications, colocalization of amplification hot spots, cancer genes, fragile sites, virus integration sites and gene size cohorts were tested in a statistical framework. Amplification-based clustering demonstrated that cancers with similar etiology, cell-of-origin or topographical location have a tendency to obtain convergent amplification profiles. The identified amplification hot spots were colocalized with the known fragile sites, cancer genes and virus integration sites, but global statistical significance could not be ascertained. Large genes were significantly overrepresented on the fragile sites and the reported amplification hot spots. These findings indicate that amplifications are selected in the cancer tissue environment according to the qualitative traits and localization of cancer genes.     

Genetic heterogeneity in lung and colorectal carcinoma as revealed by microsatellite analysis in plasma or tumor tissue DNA

BACKGROUND: Determination of tumor clonality has implications for molecular characterization and the optimal treatment of cancer. Allelotyping allows detection of the two alleles, maternal and paternal, and provides additional information regarding clonal genetic defects. The presence of allelic imbalances (AI) in tumors is a general event, but is not necessary at the same allele (alternative AI). The authors' goal was to determine whether the presence of alternative AI (AA) was a marker of heterogeneity and prognosis. METHODS: To further analyze the heterogeneity of lung tumors, tumor DNA released in the plasma was compared with primary tumor DNA from 24 lung carcinoma patients. The comparison was performed by allelotyping using 12 microsatellites targeting 9 chromosomal regions, taking in each case leukocyte DNA as reference. To extend and confirm these observations, 26 primary colorectal carcinomas with paired synchronous liver metastasis were analyzed using an enlarged panel of 33 microsatellites. RESULTS: AA were observed in 40% (20 of 50) of all patients, in 25% (6 of 24) of lung carcinoma patients but at a higher level, and in 54% (14 of 26) of colorectal carcinoma patients. They affected different chromosome localizations and each tumor stage. In both types of cancer, patients with AA had a higher AI mean frequency in their primary tumor. CONCLUSIONS: Detection of AA is an original marker of heterogeneous tumors, demonstrating that independent events occurred on specific genetic sites required for cancer progression.     

Low-frequency common fragile sites: link to neuropsychiatric disorders?

Common fragile sites are unstable chromosomal regions that predispose chromosomes to breakage and rearrangements. Recombinogenic DNA sequences encompassing these sites may contribute to both germinal and somatic genomic mutations, and the genomic instability at these regions might cause severe inherited disorders or predispose to cancer. In this review, we discuss the characterization of common fragile site FRA13A within the neurobeachin gene, which is involved in development and function of the central nervous system. We raise the possibility of an implication of common fragile sites in neuropsychiatric disorders and overview previous and recent reports concerning individual variability of expression of common fragile sites in human populations.     

Common fragile sites

Common fragile sites are regions showing site-specific gaps and breaks on metaphase chromosomes after partial inhibition of DNA synthesis. Common fragile sites are normally stable in somatic cells. However, following treatment of cultured cells with replication inhibitors, fragile sites display gaps, breaks, rearrangements and other features of unstable DNA. Studies showing that fragile sites and associated genes are frequently deleted or rearranged in many cancer cells have clearly demonstrated their importance in genome instability in cancer. Until recently, little was known about the molecular nature and mechanisms involved in fragile site instability. From studies conducted in many laboratories, it is now known that fragile sites extend over large regions, are associated with genes, exhibit delayed replication, and contain regions of high DNA flexibility. Recent findings from our laboratory showing that the key cell cycle checkpoint genes are important for genome stability at fragile sties have shed new light on these mechanisms and on the significance of these sites in cancer and normal chromosome structure. Since their discovery over two decades ago, much has been learned regarding their significance in chromosome structure and instability in cancer, but a number of key questions remain, including why these sites are 'fragile' and the impact of this instability on associated genes in cancer cells. These and other questions have been addressed by participants of this meeting, which highlighted instability at common fragile sites. This brief review is intended to provide background on common fragile sites that has led up to many of the studies presented in the accompanying reports in this volume and not to summarize the findings presented therein. Some aspects of this review were taken from Glover et al. (T.W. Glover, M.F. Arlt, A.M. Casper, S.G. Durkin, Mechanisms of common fragile site instability, Hum. Molec. Genet. 14 (in press). [1]).