Amputation for extremity soft tissue sarcoma does not increase overall survival: A retrospective cohort study

To determine if amputation increases survival when compared to limb salvage surgery in patients with a soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremity when there is often a misconception among physicians and patients that ablative surgery eliminates local recurrence and increases overall survival. This retrospective cohort study assessed 278 patients with STS and compared 18 patients who had undergone amputations for soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities to a comparative cohort of 260 patients who underwent limb salvage surgery during the same time period. Our limb salvage surgery (LSS) rate was 94% overall for soft tissue sarcomas with a median follow-up of 3.1 years. Patients undergoing amputations either had tumors that involved a critical neurovascular bundle (in particular nerve rather than vessel resection was more responsible for a decision toward ablation), or underlying bone or had neoplasms whose large size would require such an enormous resection that a functional limb would not remain. In comparing prognostic effects, mainly death due to sarcoma, distant metastasis and local recurrence, it was found that there was no statistically significant difference between patients undergoing amputation to those undergoing limb salvage surgery (p > 0.05). While amputations do not increase overall survival in soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity as compared to LSS, they are still a valuable option in a surgeon's arsenal. In particular, amputations can provide improved local control and symptomatic treatment in patients who might not be candidates for limb salvage surgery.     

Treatment and local control of primary extremity soft tissue sarcomas.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Modern series of adult extremity soft tissue sarcomas utilize combinations of modalities in all patients. Remaining questions: 1) is it necessary to strive for wide margins in the multimodality era; 2) to use adjuvant therapy in every high-grade sarcoma? 3) Does previous partial or marginal resection seriously interfere with the definitive resection? METHODS: In a retrospective review of 194 extremity soft tissue sarcomas (1977-1994), limb preservation was possible in 181/194 (93%) of cases. Patients with narrow margins received adjuvant radiation. Some patients were referred after partial (n = 39) or "complete" (n = 63) excision. RESULTS: Local recurrence was observed in 181/141 (13%) of patients treated with wide or compartmental resection, and in 10 of 42 (24%) of those treated with conservative resection plus radiation (P = 0.14). The 5-year survival rate for grade III, >/=5-cm sarcomas was not significantly different (P = 0.82) with adjuvant (46%) or without (48%) adjuvant systemic chemotherapy. Five-year survival varied (P = 0.0001) according to grade. Patients referred with partial, or "complete" (63%, 38/63, had residual tumor at reoperation) excision had a local recurrence rate of 8% and 6%, and 5-year survival rates of 75% and 84%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: 1) It is important to strive for wide margins even when adjuvant radiation is intended. 2) When a wide margin is possible, adjuvant radiation may not be necessary. 3) Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy may be considered for high-grade tumors, preferably within a prospective protocol. 4) A partial or "complete" excision of the tumor before referral to a tertiary center does not appear to compromise the limb preservation, local control, or survival rates of these patients.     

Do pathological fractures influence survival and local recurrence rate in bony sarcomas?

The influence of pathological fracture on surgical management, local recurrence and survival was established in patients with high grade, localised, extremity osteosarcoma (n=484), chondrosarcoma (n=130) and Ewing's sarcoma (n=156). Limb salvage was possible in 79% of patients with a fracture compared to 84% of patients without a fracture (p=0.17). No difference in local recurrence was found between fracture and control groups. In univariate analysis, survival in the fracture group was lower than in the control group for osteosarcoma (34% versus 58%, p<0.01) and chondrosarcoma (35% versus 63%, p=0.04), but not for Ewing's sarcoma (75% versus 64%, p=0.80). In multivariate analysis, fracture remained a significant predictor of survival for osteosarcoma, but not for chondrosarcoma, where dedifferentiated subtype appeared to be decisive. Pathological fracture independently predicts worse survival in osteosarcoma, but not chondrosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma. Limb saving surgery seems safe, if adequate resection margins are achieved.     

Local and systemic control for osteosarcoma of the extremity treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and limb salvage surgery: the Rizzoli experience

Five-hundred and twenty-six patients with non-metastatic osteosarcoma of the extremities treated at Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli from 1983 to 1995 with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and limb salvage, were retrospectively studied to evaluate the rate of local and systemic control. At a mean follow-up of 9.5 years (3-17), 320 patients remained continuously free of disease and 206 relapsed. The 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival were 64% and 70% respectively. In patients who relapsed, there were 31 local recurrences (6%). The rate of local failures was significantly higher in the 79 patients with inadequate surgical margins (marginal, intralesional, and contaminated margins) than in the 486 patients with wide surgical margins (2.6% vs. 25.0%; P<0.0001). Twenty-nine of the 31 patients (94%) with local recurrence also had metastases and died of the tumor. In comparison with patients who only had a systemic relapse, patients with local recurrences had a higher rate of metastases located in bones (41% vs. 7%; P<0.001), and a worse post-relapse outcome (5-year overall survival: 6% vs. 24%; P<0.04). We concluded that in osteosarcoma of the extremity treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: i) limb salvages procedures do not compromise the outcome of patients, provided the achievement of adequate surgical margins; ii) local recurrences are a marker either of the inadequacy of local treatment or of the high local and systemic aggressiveness of the tumor.     

Outcomes after limb sparing resection in primary malignant pelvic tumors

Aim

To evaluate morbidity, oncologic results and functional outcome in patients with malignant tumors of pelvis treated with limb sparing resection.

Methods

Between March 2002 and November 2010, 106 cases of non metastatic malignant pelvic tumors were treated with limb sparing resections of pelvis. Diagnosis included chondrosarcoma (65), Ewing's sarcoma (25), osteogenic sarcoma (10), synovial sarcoma (3) and malignant fibrous histiocytoma, high grade sarcoma, epitheloid hemangiothelioma (1 each). Three patients had intralesional surgery because of erroneous pre-operative diagnosis of benign tumor and were excluded from final analysis. Remaining 103 patients underwent limb sparing resections with intent to achieve tumor free margins. In 1 case, an intraoperative cardiac event lead to the surgery being abandoned. Reconstruction was done in 2 of 38 cases that did not include resection of acetabulum. For 64 resections involving acetabulum various reconstruction modalities were used.

Results

Surgical margins were involved in 20 patients. Forty five patients had complications. 91 patients were available for follow up. Follow up of survivors ranged from 24 to 122 months (mean 55 months).Twenty one patients (23%) had local recurrence. Sixty patients are currently alive, 46 being continuously disease free. Overall survival was 67% at 5 years. Patients in whom acetabulum was retained had better function (mean MSTS score 27) compared to patients in whom acetabulum was resected (mean MSTS score 22).

Conclusions

Though complex and challenging, limb sparing surgery in non metastatic malignant tumors is oncologically safe and has better functional outcomes than after an amputation surgery.     

Impact of ductal resection margin status on long-term survival in patients undergoing resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND: The current study was performed to clarify whether the presence of residual carcinoma in situ at ductal resection margins differs prognostically from residual invasive ductal lesions in patients undergoing surgical resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 84 patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who underwent surgical resection was conducted. The ductal resection margin status was classified as negative (n = 64 patients), positive with carcinoma in situ (n = 11 patients), or positive with invasive carcinoma (n = 9 patients). The median follow-up period was 105 months. RESULTS: Ductal margin status was found to be a strong independent prognostic factor by both univariate (P = 0.0002) and multivariate (P = 0.0039) analyses. The outcome after surgical resection was comparable between patients with negative ductal margins (median survival time of 45 months; cumulative 10-year survival rate of 40%) and those with positive ductal margins with carcinoma in situ (median survival time of 99 months; cumulative 10-year survival rate of 23%; P = 0.4742). In patients with positive ductal margins, the outcome was found to be significantly better in patients with residual carcinoma in situ than in those with residual invasive carcinoma (median survival time of 21 months; cumulative 5-year survival rate of 0%; P = 0.0003). Of 11 patients with residual carcinoma in situ, 4 died of tumor recurrence and the initial site of the disease recurrence was local. All 9 patients with residual invasive carcinoma died of disease recurrence (local recurrence with or without distant metastases) within 40 months after surgical resection. CONCLUSIONS: After surgical resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, invasive carcinoma at ductal resection margins appears to have a strong adverse effect on patient survival, whereas residual carcinoma in situ does not.     

术前放疗在软组织肉瘤保肢手术中的临床应用

目的 探讨术前放疗在软组织肉瘤保肢手术中的临床效果.方法 本组男17例,女13例;首诊6例,复发24例;年龄最大89岁,最小11岁,平均44.5岁.术前经病理检查确诊后接受直线加速器外照射,DT50Gy/25次/35天,放疗结束后休息2-4周即接受手术治疗.结果 随访时间:术后12-106个月,中位随访时间:48.3个月.术前放疗后肿瘤达到CR (complete remission) 2例、PR (partial remission) 25例,2例无变化,1例继续增大.术后因肺转移死亡6例(局部均无复发),占20% (6/30),其中2例为治疗期间出现肺转移,3例术后1年内出现肺转移,1例术后5年出现肺转移.2例分别于术后15个月和73个月局部复发,其中前者经二次广泛切除肿瘤后无复发及转移,后者合并病理性骨折而行截肢.28例无局部复发及远处转移,局部控制率93.3%(28/30).8例伤口延迟愈合,占28.7% (8/30).结论 术前放疗可以降低软组织肉瘤外科分期,缩小外科切除边界,最大限度保留肢体功能,降低局部复发率,降低保肢风险.     

Survival of Patients with Ewing’s Sarcoma in Yazd-Iran

Background: The Ewing’s sarcoma family is a group of small round cell tumors which accounts for 10-15% of all primary bone neoplasms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival of Ewing’s sarcoma patients in our province and to determine of influencing factors. Materials and Methods: All patients with documented Ewing’s sarcoma/ primitive neuroectodermal tumor(PNET) family pathology were enrolled in this study during a period of eight years. For all of them local and systemic therapy were carried out. Overall and event free survivaland prognostic factors were evaluated. Results: Thirty two patients were enrolled in the study. The median age was 17.5 years. Twenty (65.2%) were male and 9 (28.1%) were aged 14 years or less. Mean disease free survival was 26.8 (95%CI; 13.8-39.9) months and five year disease free survival was 26%. Mean overall survival was 38.7 months (95%CI; 25.9-50.6) and median overall survival was 24 months. Five year overall survival was 25%. From the variables evaluated , only presence of metastatic disease at presentation (p value=0. 028) and completeresponse (p value =0. 006) had significant relations to overall survival. Conclusions: Survival of Ewing’s sarcoma in our province is disappointing. It seems to be mostly due to less effective treatment. Administration of adequatechemotherapy dosage, resection of tumor with negative margins and precise assessment of irradiation volume may prove helpful.     

The palliative value of tumor necrosis factor alpha-based isolated limb perfusion in patients with metastatic sarcoma and melanoma

BACKGROUND: Both patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and patients with melanoma have limited treatment possibilities once the tumor has metastasized systemically. In patients with extremity STS or bulky melanoma in-transit metastases, the local tumor burden may be so problematic that, even in patients with systemically metastasized disease, an amputation may be inevitable. Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) has proven to be an excellent, local, limb-saving treatment option in patients with locally advanced extremity tumors. In this study, the authors investigated the palliative value of the ILP procedure to avoid amputation in patients who had Stage IV STS and melanoma. METHODS: From 1991 to 2003, of 339 tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF)-based ILPs, 51 procedures were performed for either Stage IV STS (n = 37 patients) or Stage IV melanoma (n = 14 patients). All patients underwent an ILP with TNF and melphalan of the upper limb (n = 4 patients) or the lower limb (n = 47 patients) with 26-140 mg melphalan and 2-4 mg TNF. RESULTS: The overall response in patients with Stage IV STS was 84%, and their median survival was 12 months after ILP. Limb salvage was achieved in 36 of 37 patients, with 1 patient undergoing amputation due to treatment toxicity. In the patients with Stage IV melanoma, the complete response rate was 43%. All patients with melanoma preserved their limb during a median survival of 7 months. CONCLUSIONS: TNF-based ILP is an excellent procedure that provided tumor control and limb salvage for the short survival of patients with metastasized, very bulky, limb-threatening tumors of the extremity.     

The significance of a marginal excision after preoperative radiation therapy for soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity

BACKGROUND:

Marginal excision of soft tissue sarcoma (STS), defined as resection through the tumor pseudocapsule or surrounding reactive tissue, increases the likelihood of local recurrence and necessitates re‐excision or postoperative radiation. However, its impact after preoperative radiation therapy (RT) remains unclear. This study therefore investigated the significance of marginal margins in patients treated with preoperative RT for extremity STS, reporting long‐term local control and limb preservation endpoints.

METHODS:

The records of 317 adults at the University of Florida with nonmetastatic extremity STS treated from 1980 to 2008 with preoperative RT as part of a limb conservation strategy were reviewed. The median follow‐up was 4.7 years (8.3 years for living patients). The median tumor size was 10 cm (range, 2‐36 cm), and 86% were high grade. The median RT dose was 50.4 Gy (range, 12.5‐57.6 Gy). Margins were classified as wide/radical (n = 105), marginal (n = 179), contaminated (n = 15), positive (n = 17), or unknown (n = 1). Endpoints were local control (LC), amputation‐free survival (AFS), cause‐specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS:

Five‐year CSS and OS rates were 62% and 59%, respectively. Five‐year LC and AFS was 93% and 89%, respectively. AFS by margin status was 64%, 83%, 97%, and 92% for positive, contaminated, marginal, and wide/radical margins, respectively (P<.005). Marginal excision following preoperative RT resulted in equivalent LC and AFS compared with wide/radical margins.

CONCLUSIONS:

Marginal resection after preoperative RT does not compromise LC or AFS in extremity STS. This finding may be related to radiosterilization of tumor cells within the reactive zone following preoperative RT. Cancer 2012;118: 3199–207. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

下肢远端恶性肿瘤的保肢治疗

目的评估下肢远端恶性肿瘤的治疗效果。方法回顾性研究澳大利亚昆士兰州骨肿瘤中心43例小腿远侧1/3或足踝部恶性肿瘤的患者,评估术后生存率(时间)肿瘤复发率、保肢后肢体功能以及并发症等。结果43例患者平均随访时间50个月,生存率为74.4%(32/43),34例进行了保肢手术,其中有2例复发(占保肢手术的5.9%)。根据骨与软组织肿瘤协会(MusculoskeletalTumorSociety,MSTS)功能评判系统对患者进行量化的患肢功能评估。在27例保肢术的患者中,平均功能评分为82.7%,86.2%(25/29)的患者在保肢术后,其末端肢体保持着正常或者较好的功能。结论在大多数下肢远端恶性肿瘤的患者中,应用广泛切除联合小区域的边缘切除、软组织皮瓣和功能性重建,同时辅助放疗和化疗的综合方案,可以降低保肢术后的复发率,提高疾病的痊愈率,降低并发症以及保留足部的感觉和负重功能。     

手术切除联合术中放疗治疗四肢复发性软组织肉瘤的安全性及近期疗效

目的:探讨手术切除联合术中放疗治疗四肢复发性软组织肉瘤的安全性及近期疗效。方法:收集2012年1月至2018年6月于我院诊断为四肢复发性软组织肉瘤并行手术切除的患者,共93例,根据患者放疗方案分为术中放疗组（38例）和体外放疗组（55例）。采用Log-rank单因素和Cox比例风险模型分析患者局部无复发生存期和总生存期的独立危险因素,并对两组术后并发症、急慢性放射性损伤、肢体功能等指标进行对比。结果:复发性软组织肉瘤局部无复发生存时间和总体生存时间与AJCC分期（P=0.030和P=0.012）和 FNCLCC分级（P=0.024和P=0.008）有关,术中放疗组与体外放疗组局部无复发生存期和总体生存时间没有明显统计学差异（P=0.663和P=0.691）。FNCLCC分级显著影响局部无复发生存期（HR=2.461,95%CI 1.094~5.537,P=0.029）和总生存期（HR=2.731,95%CI 1.249~5.971,P=0.012）。两组术后Clavien-Dindo并发症分级（P=0.048）、急性放射性损伤（P=0.043）、慢性放射性损伤（P＜0.001）以及肢体功能评分（P＜0.001）差异均有统计学意义。结论:手术切除联合术中放疗治疗四肢复发性软组织肉瘤具有较好的近期疗效及安全性。     

Soft tissue sarcomas of the popliteal fossa: outcome and risk factors.

BACKGROUND: Limb salvage surgery of popliteal soft tissue sarcomas may be hampered due to the incomplete anatomical containment of this region and the vicinity of neurovascular structures. The scope of this study was to determine outcome and to define risk factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 27 patients (53.3+/-15.8 y; 16/27 male) with popliteal soft tissue sarcomas were assessed. Mean follow-up was 40.9+/-33.8 months (48.5+/-36.7 months in surviving patients). 9/27 patients were included after prior treatment elsewhere (5 after intralesional resections and 4 local recurrences). The lesions were staged IB in 8/27 patients, IIB in 17/27 and III in 2/27. Immediate amputations were performed in 7/27 patients. 15/27 patients were subjected to radiation therapy (preoperative in 6/15 cases), 8/27 patients received chemotherapy (5/8 preoperatively). RESULTS: Overall survival and disease-free survival at 5 y was 63.0% and 59.5%. Local recurrence occurred in 2 patients. 8/27 patients developed metastatic disease after 28.9+/-9.8 months. Survival (p=0.397) and disease-free survival (p=0.113) did not differ in patients after amputations vs limb salvage. Application of radiation therapy was associated with a better survival (p=0.003). Complications related to the surgical intervention were recorded in 2/27 patients, complications related to radiation therapy occurred in 6/15 patients. DISCUSSION: Despite being extra-compartmental, popliteal sarcomas can be treated with a high rate of limb salvage while equal safety compared to amputations is maintained. Irradiation improved survival in our patient population. In cases with involvement of neurovascular structures, preoperative down-staging with radio or chemo-therapy may prevent amputation.     

Role of postoperative radiotherapy after pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy: a single institute experience of 415 patients

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical benefit deriving from early (within 6 months) radiotherapy (ERT) after pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy for localized/locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the prostate in a single-institution series. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively analyzed 415 patients who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy between 1986 and 1998 for pT2b-pT4, pN0-pN1 prostate carcinoma. Of the 415 patients, 237 underwent ERT for adverse pathologic findings and 178 patients did not receive RT or underwent salvage RT < or =6 months (salvage or no RT [SNRT]). RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 62 months, the 8-year actuarial freedom from biochemical, local and systemic failure, and cause-specific survival rate was 69% vs. 31% (p <0.0001, log-rank), 93% vs. 63% (p <0.0001), 88% vs. 75% (p = 0.04), and 93% vs. 80% (p = 0.02) in the ERT and SNRT group, respectively. A subgroup analysis indicated that an improvement in 8-year actuarial cause-specific survival was associated with ERT in patients with positive resection margins (91% vs. 67%, p = 0.007), extracapsular extension (92% vs. 75%, p = 0.002), Gleason score > or =7 (88% vs. 72%, p = 0.02), and lymph node metastases (88% vs. 68%, p = 0.04). This strong association between ERT and cause-specific survival persisted at multivariate analysis in the whole group of patients examined (hazard ratio, 4.3) and in the subgroups of patients with extracapsular extension (hazard ratio, 4.9), positive resection margins (hazard ratio, 4.7), Gleason score > or =7 (hazard ratio, 4.4), and lymph node metastases (hazard ratio, 7.4). CONCLUSION: The results of this retrospective analysis indicate that ERT after pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy improved the 5-year and actuarial 8-year cause-specific survival of patients with adverse pathologic findings such as extracapsular extension, positive resection margins, Gleason score > or =7, and/or positive lymph nodes.     

Limb salvage therapy for soft tissue sarcomas of the foot

From 1974 to 1988, 20 patients with soft tissue sarcomas of the foot underwent attempted limb preservation at UCLA. Eighteen patients had localized tumor and two had metastases. Sixteen patients had previously untreated tumors and four patients had experienced 2-4 local recurrences before definitive management. Eleven patients had grade 3 sarcomas and nine had grade 2 sarcomas. Fourteen patients had an excisional biopsy and six had an incisional biopsy. At the time of definitive local treatment, nine patients had palpable tumor ranging from 2-10 cm (median 5 cm). Sixteen patients received sequential preoperative chemotherapy and irradiation followed by attempted conservative resection. Four patients underwent immediate conservative resection followed by postoperative irradiation. Preoperative chemotherapy was administered over 3 days intraarterially, intravenously or by a combination of routes. Fifteen patients received 60-90 mg doxorubicin and one received 120 mg doxorubicin plus 220 mg cisplatinum. Preoperative irradiation was delivered in 350 cGy fractions to total doses of 3500 cGy (one patient), 2800 cGy (8) or 1750 cGy (7). Postoperative irradiation doses were 4140-6480 delivered in 180-200 cGy fractions. Fifteen of 16 preoperatively treated patients had limb salvage surgery. Four of these 15 had positive histopathologic margins and none received postoperative irradiation. One patient required a primary amputation due to gross involvement of the os calcis. Three of four patients undergoing immediate conservative excision had positive margins and one had gross residual disease. Five patients received chemotherapy following local treatment: 3 adjuvantly and 2 for metastatic disease. Follow-up for salvage patients ranged from 6 to 99 months (median 36). Local control was achieved in 17 of 19 (90%). Two patients recurred in-field at 24 and 30 months. Fourteen of 15 preoperatively treated and salvaged patients maintained local control. Three of four managed with excision and postoperative irradiation were controlled. The actuarial local control at 3 years was 83%. One patient recurred in the inguinal lymph nodes and three patients died of metastatic disease. The actuarial survival and relapse-free survival at 3 years were 83% and 63%. Eleven patients developed acute complications and four had late complications. Of 14 patients surviving with local control, function was good or excellent in 86%. No patient has required an amputation for complications or a dysfunctional foot. Limb salvage therapy for a selected patient with a soft tissue sarcoma of the foot can reasonably be expected to result in a high probability of local control and useful function without compromising survival.     

Limb sparing surgery in soft tissue sarcoma of extremities: An Indian Perspective

This is a retrospective study of 57 patients with extremity soft tissue sarcomas treated at Gujarat Cancer Research Institute, Gujarat, India from January 2005 to December 2007. It aims to review the feasibility of limb sparing surgery for extremity soft tissue sarcoma in Indian population. Twenty-eight percent (28%) of tumors were located in the upper limbs and 72% in the lower extremities. The goal of treatment was limb salvage if feasible. The treatment consisted of amputation in 17 (30%) and local wide excision i.e. limb salvage surgery (LSS) in 40 (70%) patients. The most common histology was pleomorphic sarcoma (21%). Sixty-four percent (64%) of the patients were treated with surgery alone, 32% with surgery plus radiation and 4% with surgery plus systemic chemotherapy. Inadequate margins were present in 12% of the patients. All the patients were followed up for at least 2 years. Recurrence in the form of local and distant occurred in 39% of the patients. Local recurrence occurred in 18% of the patients who underwent LSS and in 35% of those who underwent amputation. Pulmonary metastasis was detected in 16% of patients. The 2 year mortality was 10.5% with the most common etiology being lung metastasis and the most common histology being leiomyosarcoma. We concluded that limb salvage surgery for soft tissue sarcoma is feasible in the Indian population (70%) although the rate is lower than that of world literature at 90%. Keywords: soft tissue sarcoma, wide excision, amputation, limb salvage surgery, Indian population.     

Limb salvage in soft tissue sarcomas involving neurovascular structures using combined surgical resection and brachytherapy

While there is debate in the literature concerning the tolerance of neurovascular structures to external beam radiation, the tolerance of these tissues to interstitial radiation has never been established. To evaluate the dose of radiation and its effect on early and late toxicity of neurovascular structures, a retrospective review of our experience was undertaken. Between 1975 and 1987, 299 patients with extremity sarcomas underwent limb-sparing surgery and tumor bed Iridium-192 interstitial implantation at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Forty-five patients (15%) of this group were found to have locally advanced tumors involving major neurovascular structures. Of these patients, 64% had high grade lesions. Eleven percent had evidence of gross residual disease on these structures, and an additional 58% had microscopic residual disease at or close to the margins of resection. After loading catheters were placed directly upon the neurovascular structures in the exposed tumor bed and a median dose of 4400 cGy was delivered to the target volume. Eight patients had previous radiation to the treated field and 13 patients received postoperative radiation. With a median follow-up of 4 years, the 5-year actuarial disease-free survival was 69% and the 5-year actuarial freedom from in-field failure was 79%. The 5-year actuarial incidence of distant metastases was 30%. Eighty-four percent of the patients maintained long-term preservation of limb function without the need for amputation. Four patients (9%) ultimately developed evidence of radiation neuritis 6-20 months post therapy. All four patients had received additional radiation with cumulative doses exceeding 9000 cGy to the neurovascular bundle. We conclude that combined surgical resection and interstitial radiation for locally advanced sarcomas with neurovascular involvement can provide excellent local control with preservation of limb and neurovascular function without significant toxicity.     

Extraskeletal Ewing's sarcoma

BACKGROUND: Ewing's sarcoma usually is identified as a primary malignancy of bone affecting children and young adults. Extraskeletal Ewing's sarcoma is rare, and very few data are available addressing optimal surgical and oncologic treatment modalities. METHODS: The authors chose to review retrospectively 24 patients with extraskeletal Ewing's sarcoma treated at the study institution with modern multimodality therapies. Anatomic location, tumor size, patient age at diagnosis, stage of disease at the time of diagnosis, surgical margins, radiation dose, and the type and dose of chemotherapy were documented for every patient. Follow-up averaged 64 months for surviving patients. RESULTS: The overall 5-year survival rate was 61% and the disease free survival rate was 54%. A multivariate analysis found that younger age at the time of diagnosis was associated with improved 5-year survival and disease free survival (P = 0.008 and P = 0.005, respectively). Patients who underwent wide resection and less-than-wide resection had better overall survival (P = 0.001 and P = 0.015, respectively) and disease free survival (P = 0.002 and P = 0.024) compared with those who underwent no attempt at surgical resection. Patients who underwent a wide resection had an improved overall survival compared with those who underwent a less-than-wide resection (P = 0.045). The size of the lesion (P = 0.277) and the presence of metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis (P = 0.219) were not found to be significant prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Age and surgical treatment were found to be important prognostic variables in the treatment of extraskeletal Ewing's sarcoma. No other variables, such as tumor size, tumor location, stage of disease, or radiation therapy, were found to improve survival. Surgical resection should be considered for all patients with extraskeletal Ewing's sarcoma.     

新辅助化疗结合保肢手术治疗肢体骨肉瘤

目的：评价新辅助化疗结合保肢手术治疗肢体骨肉瘤的临床疗效。方法：选择1995年1月-2003年1月新辅助化疗结合保肢手术治疗的肢体骨肉瘤31例。广泛切除22例，边缘切除9例。所有病例切除标本均做多病理切片的坏死率评估结果：随访2～8年，31例中无瘤生存超过5年19例（61.3％），肿瘤局部复发4例（12.9％）。肢体功能评估优良率为67．7％：结论：新辅助化疗结合保肢手术是治疗肢体骨肉瘤理想的治疗方法，术前有效化疗是保肢术成功的关键。     

Phase II trial of carcinoembryonic antigen radioimmunotherapy with 131I-labetuzumab after salvage resection of colorectal metastases in the liver: five-year safety and efficacy results.

PURPOSE: Although complete resection (R0) of liver metastases (LM) remains the treatment of choice for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients amenable to curative therapy, only approximately one third survive for 5 years. The objective of this phase II study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of radioimmunotherapy (RAIT) after salvage resection of LM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients who underwent surgery for LM of CRC received a dose of 40 to 60 mCi/m2 of 131I-labetuzumab, which is a humanized monoclonal antibody against carcinoembryonic antigen. Safety (n = 23), disease-free survival (DFS; n = 19), and overall survival (OS; n = 19) were determined. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 64 months, the median OS time from the first liver resection for RAIT patients was 68.0 months (95% CI, 46.0 months to infinity), and the median DFS time was 18.0 months (95% CI, 11.0 to 31.0 months). The 5-year survival rate was 51.3%. RAIT benefited patients independently of bilobar involvement, size and number of LM, and resection margins. The major adverse effect was transient myelosuppression, resulting mostly in grade < or = 3 neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSION: Because both the median OS and 5-year survival rates seem to be improved with adjuvant RAIT after complete LM resection in CRC, compared with historical and contemporaneous controls not receiving RAIT, these results justify further evaluation of this modality in a multicenter, randomized trial.