Abdominal aortic endograft proximal collapse resulting in aortic aneurysm rupture

An 82-year-old man was transferred to our emergency department due to acute abdominal pain. He had undergone an endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) six years ago. An intravenous contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography revealed the rupture of the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with a large retroperitoneal hematoma. A Talent (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) modular bifurcated endoprosthesis had vertically collapsed approximately 7 cm after losing its infrarenal fixation. As a result, it led to the repressurization of the aneurysm sac and rupture. The patient was successfully treated by placing three Talent (Medtronic) aortic cuffs. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of endograft collapse that has manifested with aortic aneurysm rupture. Although they are gradually declining, considerable rates of complications create the 'Achilles' heel' of endovascular repair of AAAs. A lifelong follow-up strategy for patients treated for AAA with EVAR is essential for the early detection and treatment of complications of the procedure.     

Endovascular repair of late abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture owing to mixed-type endoleak following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

We report the successful endovascular repair of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in a multimorbid patient 8 months after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). A 74-year-old man with a history of EVAR 8 months earlier presented with hypotension, severe back pain, and tenderness on abdominal palpation. A contrast-enhanced computed tomographic scan showed a large retroperitoneal hematoma and confirmed the diagnosis of secondary abdominal aortic rupture. Because the patient had severe comorbidities, the endovascular method was chosen for further management. Two stent grafts were placed appropriately to eliminate a type 1a and a type 3 endoleak owing to modular separation of the left iliac graft limb from the main body stent graft. An additional self-expanding stent was deployed in the solitary right renal artery to open its origin, which was partially overlapped by the proximal cuff. The patient was discharged on the tenth postoperative day and is alive and well 1 year postoperatively. This case indicates that endovascular repair is feasible not only in cases of primarily ruptured AAAs but also in secondarily ruptured AAAs after failure of EVAR.     

Late endovascular aneurysm repair infection presenting with juxatrenal aortic rupture treated with in situ aortic replacement

Infection of an endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair (EVAR) is rare but has become more prevalent with the standardization of EVAR for treating infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. The understanding of this complex aortic condition has improved but still remains to evolve. We present a patient with an EVAR infection manifesting with juxtarenal aortic rupture as a result of a urinary tract infection. This report describes an unusual presentation of an EVAR infection treated with in situ aortic reconstruction and provides >1 year of follow-up.     

The post-operative complications of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) was first described in 1991. It has now been established as a technically feasible and successful procedure in the short-term and may be a viable long-term alternative to open aortic aneurysm repair. However, EVAR is associated with a significant risk of complication in terms of both procedural associated morbidity and operative mortality. These complications have important implications since if EVAR is to replace open aneurysm repair in the future it must be associated with equivalent or preferably better peri-operative mortality and long-term outcome. This paper reviews the current published data regarding the nature, incidence and implications of the complications of EVAR.     

Extended use of endovascular aneurysm sealing for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR) is now an established treatment modality for suitable patients presenting with aneurysm rupture. EVAR for ruptured aneurysms reduces transfusion, mechanical ventilation, intensive care. and hospital stay when compared with open surgery. In the emergency setting, however, EVAR is limited by low applicability due to adverse clinical or anatomical characteristics and increased need for reintervention. In addition, ongoing bleeding from aortic side branches post-EVAR can cause hemodynamic instability, larger hematomas, and abdominal compartment syndrome. Endovascular aneurysm sealing, based on polymer filling of the aneurysm, has the potential to overcome some of the limitations of EVAR for ruptured aneurysms and to improve outcomes. Recent literature suggests that endovascular aneurysm sealing can be performed with early mortality similar to that of EVAR for ruptured aortic aneurysms, but experience is limited to a few centers and a small number of patients. The addition of chimney grafts can increase the applicability of endovascular aneurysm sealing in order to treat short-neck and juxtarenal aneurysms as an alternative to fenestrated endografts. Further evaluation of the technique, with larger longitudinal studies, is necessary before advocating wider implementation of endovascular aneurysm sealing in the emergency setting.     

Delayed paraplegia after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm

Paraplegia is rare after open repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm, and only two cases have been reported after endovascular repair, both due to atheroembolism. Incidence of renal failure after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) in patients with normal preoperative renal function is about 8.7%, but is much higher in those with preexisting renal impairment, possibly because of administration of nephrotoxic contrast media during EVAR. We report a case in which contrast medium-induced acute renal failure is believed to have led to delayed paraplegia after EVAR.     

Midterm results after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in the elderly

During the past decade, endovascular aneurysm stent graft repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms has emerged as a less invasive and less burdening alternative to open surgical repair. We hypothesize that EVAR may become the treatment method of choice among elderly patients. During a 7-year-period, EVAR was performed in 654 patients at our institution. One hundred fifty seven (20 %) of these patients were older than 75 years. Our prospectively acquired database was reviewed with respect to midterm results of this elderly population. Aneurysm-related events (aneurysm-related death, endoleaks, conversion, renal infarction or aneurysm rupture) and secondary interventions were the main study endpoints. There were significantly (p < 0.05) higher endoleackage-, conversion and renal infarction rates among this subgroup of patients. In addition, aneurysm related morbidity and mortality were significantly elevated (p = 0.0011). The discussion about early operation at younger age and smaller aneurysm diameter continues. Nevertheless, improved EVAR devices and surgeon experience may make improve future results. Elective endovascular repair failed to demonstrate any benefit in elderly patients (> 75 yrs.) in the midterm outcome. In rupture, this procedure might be the treatment method of choice for patients in this age group who meet specific anatomical criteria.     

脑脊液引流在胸降及胸腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术中对截瘫的预防保护

目的:探讨脑脊液引流在胸降、胸腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术中对截瘫的预防保护作用。方法:回顾性分析我科于2007年9月至2009年12月期间的32例胸降、胸腹主动脉瘤行腔内修复术病人,在术中及术后予以脑脊液引流的效果。结果:所有病人痊愈出院,随访1个月~1年。4例病人术后出现轻瘫症状,经脑脊液引流后治愈;其余病人围手术期间及随访期间未出现截瘫表现,治疗期间无严重并发症。结论:脑脊液引流可在胸降、胸腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术中有效地预防及治疗轻瘫及截瘫。     

Outcome after endovascular stent graft treatment for mycotic aortic aneurysm: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment for mycotic aortic aneurysms is not optimal. Even with a large excision, extensive debridement, in situ or extra-anatomical reconstruction, and with or without lifelong antibiotic treatment, mycotic aneurysms still carry very high mortality and morbidity. The use of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for mycotic aortic aneurysms simplifies the procedure and provides a good alternative for this critical condition. However, the question remains: if EVAR is placed in an infected bed, what is the outcome of the infection? Does it heal, become aggravated, or even cause a disastrous aortic rupture? In this study, we tried to clarify the risk factors for such an adverse response. METHODS: A literature review was undertaken by using MEDLINE. All relevant reports on endoluminal management of mycotic aortic aneurysms were included. Logistic regressions were applied to identify predictors of persistent infection. RESULTS: A total of 48 cases from 22 reports were included. The life-table analysis showed that the 30-day survival rate was 89.6% +/- 4.4%, and the 2-year survival rate was 82.2% +/- 5.8%. By univariate analysis, age 65 years or older, rupture of the aneurysm (including those with aortoenteric fistula and aortobronchial fistula), and fever at the time of operation were identified as significant predictors of persistent infection, and preoperative use of antibiotics for longer than 1 week and an adjunct procedure combined with EVAR were identified as significant protective factors for persistent infection. However, by multivariate logistic regression analysis, the only significant independent predictors identified were rupture of aneurysm and fever. CONCLUSIONS: EVAR seems a possible alternative method for treating mycotic aortic aneurysms. Identification of the risk factors for persistent infection may help to decrease surgical morbidity and mortality. EVAR could be used as a temporary measure; however, a definite surgical treatment should be considered for patients present with aneurysm rupture or fever.     

Acute symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm secondary to endovascular stent graft associated type II endoleak

Endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair (EVAR) is popular because of its low invasiveness and feasibility for high-risk patients. Endoleak is common after EVAR and is characterized by blood flow within the aneurysm sac but outside the stent graft. Type II or collateral endoleak commonly results from retrograde filling of the aneurysm from collateral visceral vessels, lumbar, inferior mesenteric, accessory renal or sacral arteries. Collateral leaks are generally thought to be benign and over half of the early leaks will seal spontaneously. Sporadically, collateral endoleak could lead to aneurysm sac pressurization and place the patient at ongoing risk of rupture. Herein, we report an uncommon case of early post-stent graft placement symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm associated with type II endoleak.     

Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair to prevent rupture in a patient requiring lithotripsy

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for urolithiasis may result in rupture of a coexistent abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). We report a patient who required ESWL and who had an AAA. Open surgery was precluded by morbid obesity and persisting incisional hernias after mesh repair. Endovascular AAA repair (EVAR) with bifurcated grafts was precluded by an 11-mm distal aorta. EVAR with stacked tubular AneuRx components was performed, followed by ESWL. The AAA was excluded, and the integrity and position of the endografts were not altered by ESWL.     

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: current status

INTRODUCTION: Endovascular aneurysm surgery (EVAR) was introduced a decade ago. Early results are promising, however, there remain concerns regarding the longer-term durability of this technique. Consequently, the national multi-centre EVAR trial has been commenced to define the role of endovascular surgery in the management of abdominal aortic aneurysm. DISCUSSION: Successful EVAR requires accurate pre-operative assessment of aneurysm morphology. Current stent-grafts allow 60% of all infra-renal AAA to be treated. Reduced physiological stress and low peri-operative morbidity and mortality rates have been demonstrated with this technique when compared to open repair. Endoleak is an Achilles heel of EVAR, although in itself does not accurately predict outcome. First and second generation devices are estimated to have a 1% per year risk of rupture. CONCLUSIONS: Increased understanding of the issues surrounding aneurysm morphology and successful stent-grafting have allowed a major reduction of early type I endoleak. Late endoleak and graft migration remain problematic. Type I and III endoleaks are risk factors for subsequent rupture although the significance of type II endoleak remains uncertain. More robust indicators of outcome success/failure are required so that follow-up may be rationalised.     

Clinical presentation,operative management,and long-term outcomes of rupture after previous abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

ObjectiveThe aim of the present study was to evaluate the presentation trends, intervention, and survival of patients who had been treated for late abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture (LAR) after open repair (OR) or endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).MethodsWe reviewed the clinical data from a single-center, retrospective database for patients treated for LAR from 2000 to 2020. The end points were the 30-day mortality, major postoperative complication, and survival. The outcomes between LAR managed with EVAR (group I) vs OR were compared (group II).ResultsOf 390 patients with infrarenal aortic rupture, 40 (10%) had experienced aortic rupture after prior aortic repair and comprised the LAR cohort (34 men; age 78 ± 8 years). LAR had occurred before EVAR in 30 and before OR in 10 patients. LAR was more common in the second half of the study with 32 patients after 2010. LAR after prior OR was secondary to ruptured para-anastomotic pseudoaneurysms. After initial EVAR, LAR had occurred despite reintervention in 17 patients (42%). The time to LAR was shorter after prior EVAR than after OR (6 ± 4 vs 12 ± 4 years, respectively; P = .003). Treatment for LAR was EVAR for 25 patients (63%; group I) and OR for 15 (37%, group II). LAR after initial OR was managed with endovascular salvage for 8 of 10 patients. Endovascular management was more frequent in the latter half of the study period. In group I, fenestrated repair had been used for seven patients (28%). Salvage for the remaining cases was feasible with EVAR, aortic cuffs, or limb extensions. The incidence of free rupture, time to treatment, 30-day mortality (8% vs 13%; P = .3), complications (32% vs 60%; P = .1), and disposition were similar between the two groups. Those in group I had had less blood loss (660 vs 3000 mL; P < .001) and less need for dialysis (0% vs 33%; P < .001) than those in group II. The median follow-up was 21 months (interquartile range, 6-45 months). The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival was 76%, 52%, and 41%, respectively, and was similar between groups (28 vs 22 months; P = .48). Late mortality was not related to the aorta.ConclusionsLAR after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair has been encountered more frequently in clinical practice, likely driven by the frequency of EVAR. However, most LARs, including those after previous OR, can now be salvaged with endovascular techniques with lower morbidity and mortality.     

Chronic contained abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture after suprarenal fixation fatigue fracture

Chronic contained rupture (CCR) of an abdominal aortic aneurysm is a rare condition, and differential diagnosis might be difficult. We present a clinical case of a hemodynamically stable octogenarian who presented with intermittent pain in the left lower abdomen. The patient had a history of diverticulitis, and 6 years ago, he had undergone endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) with a Talent bifurcated prosthesis. Additionally, 20 days before his admission to our hospital, he had undergone a secondary iliac limb extension for treatment of post-EVAR rupture. On admission, abdominal plain radiography identified suprarenal fixation fracture as a possible reason for CCR, but computed tomographic angiography failed to confirm any endoleak or "active" bleeding and rupture. The patient received medication treatment for possible diverticulitis and was kept under close monitoring for suspected failure of recently performed secondary endovascular procedure and CCR. A day later, the abdominal pain symptoms worsened, and a new computed tomographic angiography confirmed the suspected CCR. The patient was treated successfully by "open" repair using a Y prosthesis. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of post-EVAR CCR due to suprarenal fixation fatigue fracture. Lifelong post-EVAR follow-up with high level of both clinical and imaging diagnostic accuracy is essential for the early recognition and proper treatment of EVAR pitfalls.     

Noninvasive measurement of aortic aneurysm sac tension with vibrometry

OBJECTIVE: Currently, the risk of aneurysm sac rupture after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is estimated by using a group of anatomic variables. Available techniques for pressure monitoring include either direct measurement using catheter-based techniques or indirect measurement requiring implantation of a pressure sensor during aneurysm repair. None of these methods is without limitations. Radiation pressure, such as that generated by a modulated ultrasound (US) beam, can induce surface vibration at a distance. The velocity of the resulting surface waves depends on the tensile stress of the vibrated surface. By measuring the change in wave velocity, it is possible to detect the change in tensile stress and calculate the pressure through the vibrated surface. We tested this concept in an in vitro aneurysm model. METHODS: Rubber tubes and explanted porcine abdominal aortas were used to model an aneurysm sac. The surface of the model was vibrated with an amplitude-modulated US beam. The resulting motion was detected either by reflected laser light or by Doppler US. The phase of the propagating wave was measured to assess changes in velocity with different pressures. RESULTS: Increasing hydrostatic pressure in the rubber model correlated well with the cumulative phase shift (R(2) = 0.96-0.99; P < .0001). By using a pump to generate dynamic pressure (between 110 and 200 mm Hg), the cumulative phase shift correlated well with the square of the mean pressure (R(2) = 0.92; P < .0001); however, the correlation with pulse pressure was poor (24-36 mm Hg; r = 0.38; P < .02). In the porcine in vitro aortic sac model, the cumulative phase shift detected with both laser (r = 0.94-0.99; P < .0001) and Doppler (r = 0.96-0.99; P < .0001) correlated well with the aneurysm pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Application of vibrometry for noninvasive measurement of aortic aneurysm sac tension is feasible in an in vitro setting. The concept of vibrometry may be used to detect endotension noninvasively after EVAR. Vibrometry may also be used to estimate wall stress in native aneurysms, and it may predict the risk of aneurysm rupture. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Vibrometry may offer a technique for completely noninvasive monitoring of aneurysm sac pressure after EVAR. Vibrometry is based on the following principles: radiation pressure, such as that generated by modulated US, can induce surface vibration at a distance; by measuring the change in wave velocity of vibration, it is possible to detect changes in tensile stress and calculate the pressure through the vibrated surface. We tested this concept in an in vitro model and found that application of vibrometry for noninvasive measurement of aortic aneurysm sac tension is feasible. Vibrometry may also be used to estimate wall stress in native aneurysms.     

Anaesthesia for the ruptured aortic aneurysm

The perioperative management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAA) remains a core anaesthetic competency. Changes such as service centralization, aneurysm screening and the developing role of emergency endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) are altering the demands upon anaesthetists. Whereas previously on-site general anaesthesia for resuscitative open aneurysm repair (OAR) was standard, now transfer, choice of surgical technique and options for anaesthetic management may need to be considered. We present the key components of emergency anaesthesia for both OAR and EVAR and describe clinical dilemmas arising at preoperative and intraoperative stages.     

Anaesthesia for the ruptured aortic aneurysm

The perioperative management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAA) remains a core anaesthetic competency. Changes such as service centralization, aneurysm screening and the developing role of emergency endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) are altering the demands upon anaesthetists. Whereas previously on-site general anaesthesia for resuscitative open aneurysm repair (OAR) was standard, now transfer, choice of surgical technique and options for anaesthetic management may need to be considered. We present the key components of emergency anaesthesia for both OAR and EVAR and describe clinical dilemmas arising at preoperative and intraoperative stages.     

Open versus endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in VA hospitals

BACKGROUND: Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), when compared with conventional open surgical repair, has been shown to reduce perioperative morbidity and mortality. We performed a retrospective cohort study with prospectively collected data from the Department of Veterans Affairs to examine outcomes after elective aneurysm repair. STUDY DESIGN: We studied 30-day mortality, 1-year survival, and postoperative complications in 1,904 patients who underwent elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR n=717 [37.7%]; open n=1,187 [62.3%]) at 123 Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals between May 1, 2001 and September 30, 2003. We investigated the influence of patient, operative, and hospital variables on outcomes. RESULTS: Patients undergoing EVAR had significantly lower 30-day (3.1% versus 5.6%, p=0.01) and 1- year mortality rates (8.7% versus 12.1%, p=0.018) than patients having open repair. EVAR was associated with a decrease in 30-day postoperative mortality (adjusted odds ratio[OR]=0.59; 95% CI=0.36, 0.99; p=0.04). The risk of perioperative complications was much less after EVAR (15.5% versus 27.7%; p<0.001; unadjusted OR 0.48; 95% CI=0.38, 0.61; p<0.001). Patients operated on at low volume hospitals (25% of entire cohort) were more likely to have had open repair (31.3% compared with 15.9% EVAR; p<0.001) and a nearly two-fold increase in adjusted 30-day mortality risk (OR=1.9; 95% CI=1.19, 2.98; p=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: In routine daily practice, veterans who undergo elective EVAR have substantially lower perioperative mortality and morbidity rates compared with patients having open repair. The benefits of a minimally invasive approach were readily apparent in this cohort, but we recommend using caution in choosing EVAR for all elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs until longer-term data on device durability are available.     

Minimally invasive retrieval of a dislodged Wallstent endoprosthesis after an endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is being performed more frequently in patients with concomitant iliac artery occlusive disease. We report a case of a 70-year-old male status post angioplasty and stenting of bilateral iliac arteries for occlusive disease who subsequently underwent EVAR for a rapidly expanding abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). One month after the placement of the endograft, it was discovered that the previously placed Wallstent had been dislodged during the endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Minimally invasive retrieval using an Amplatz Goose Neck Snare was successful in recovering the stent. This case underscores the danger of performing EVAR in the setting of prior iliac artery stenting and the potential complications that may ensue.     

Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a community hospital's experience

Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has become the first-line approach for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Outcomes outside of tertiary care settings remain unknown. The purpose of this study is to report the midterm outcomes of EVAR in a community hospital. A retrospective review of 75 elective, consecutive EVARs performed at a single nonacademic community hospital was performed. There were no conversions to open repair during or after endovascular repair. The mean follow-up was 18 months. There were no postoperative ruptures or aneurysm-related deaths. At 24 months, freedom from aneurysm-related death was 100%, freedom from secondary interventions was 91%, and freedom from endoleak was 69%. EVAR in the community setting is a safe and durable procedure, even in a medically high-risk population. Comparable outcomes can be achieved to tertiary care centers, in carefully selected patients with favorable anatomy.