Effect of epidural analgesia on maximum and minimum blood pressures during the first stage of labour in primigravidae with mild/moderate gestational hypertension

Summary. One of the arguments used in favour of epidural analgesia for hypertensive patients in labour is its effect on mean arterial blood pressure, although the fetal and maternal risk from hypertension is more closely linked to maximum recorded levels. We have therefore assessed the effect of epidural analgesia on maximum blood pressure. There was no change in the maximum systolic or diastolic blood pressure after epidural analgesia when compared to baseline values or levels in untreated hypertensive controls. We conclude that this form of analgesia should be offered to hypertensive patients purely for its analgesic effect and not as a method for blood pressure control.     

Epidural analgesia and placental blood flow during labour in pregnancies complicated by hypertension

Placental blood flow was measured during the first stage of labour in pregnancies complicated by essential hypertension or severe pre-eclampsia using a 133Xe clearance technique before and after segmental epidural analgesia. Analgesia was produced with 0.5 per cent plain bupivacaine in six patients with essential hypertension and in 11 patients with severe pre-eclampsia. After segmental epidural analgesia the placental blood flow was slightly but insiginificantly improved in most of the patients with pre-eclampsia and in half of the patients with essential hypertension, thus suggesting this analgesic method to be safe in hypertensive pregnancies in the absence of any substantial change in systemic blood pressure.     

Sympathoadrenal activity,maternal, fetal,and neonatal responses after epidural anesthesia in the preeclamptic patient

This study confirms that preeclamptic patients have higher plasma levels of catecholamine than those of normal patients. It also demonstrates that epidural analgesia when administered to the preeclamptic patient during labor is followed by a significant reduction in the plasma levels of catecholamines without any adverse effects on maternal blood pressure, uterine activity, fetal heart rate, or the neonate.     

The effect of continuous epidural analgesia on cesarean section for dystocia in nulliparous women

Epidural analgesia in labor is generally accepted as safe and effective and therefore has become increasingly popular. However, little is known regarding the effect of epidural analgesia on the incidence of cesarean section for dystocia in nulliparous women. During the first 6 months of 1987 we studied 711 consecutive nulliparous women at term, with cephalic fetal presentations and spontaneous onset of labor. Comparison of 447 patients who received epidural analgesia in labor with 264 patients who received either narcotics or no analgesia was performed. The incidence of cesarean section for dystocia was significantly greater (p less than 0.005) in the epidural group (10.3%) than in the nonepidural group (3.8%). There remained a significantly increased incidence (p less than 0.005) of cesarean section for dystocia in the epidural group after selection bias was corrected and the following confounding variables were controlled by multivariate analysis: maternal age, race, gestational age, cervical dilatation on admission, use of oxytocin, duration of oxytocin use, maximum infusion rate of oxytocin, duration of labor, presence of meconium, and birth weight. The incidence of cesarean section for fetal distress was similar (p greater than 0.20) in both groups. There were no clinically significant differences in frequency of low Apgar scores at 5 minutes or cord arterial and venous blood gas parameters between the two groups. This study suggests that epidural analgesia in labor may increase the incidence of cesarean section for dystocia in nulliparous women.     

Effective epidural blood patch volumes for postdural puncture headache in Taiwanese women.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Epidural blood patch (EDBP) is the most commonly used method to treat postdural puncture headache (PDPH). The optimal or effective blood volume for epidural injection is still controversial and under debated. This study compared the therapeutic efficacy of 7.5 mL blood vs. 15 mL blood for EDBP via epidural catheter injection. METHODS: Thirty-three patients who suffered from severe PDPH due to accidental dural puncture during epidural anesthesia for cesarean section or epidural analgesia for labor pain control were randomly allocated into two groups. EDBP was conducted and autologous blood 7.5 mL or 15 mL was injected via an epidural catheter in the semi-sitting position in Group I (n = 17) and II (n = 16), respectively. For all patients in both groups, the severity of PDPH was registered on a 4-point scale (none, mild, moderate, severe) and assessed 1 hour, 24 hours and 3 days after EDBP. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two groups of patients at all time points with respect to the severity of PDPH. Two patients in Group I and nine in Group II developed nerve root irritating pain during blood injection (p < 0.05). No systemic complications were noted in both groups of patients throughout EDBP injection. CONCLUSION: We conclude that injection of 7.5 mL autologous blood into the epidural space is comparable to 15 mL blood in its analgesic effect on PDPH, but with less nerve root irritating pain during injection.     

Epidural analgesia and the course of delivery in term primiparas

OBJECTIVES: Epidural analgesia provides the most effective pain control during labor. Of great concern is its influence on the course of delivery and perinatal complications. DESIGN: The aim of the study was to assess the effect of epidural analgesia on the course of delivery and perinatal outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 609 deliveries among 1334 (323 women with epidural analgesia (53%) and 548 without epidural analgesia (47%)) met the following criteria: primipara, singleton, live pregnancy, > =37 weeks' gestation, cephalic presentation of a fetus, lack of contraindication for vaginal delivery. The incidence of instrumental deliveries and fetal distress, duration of the first, second and third stage of labor, perinatal outcome, perinatal complications and perinatal blood loss and were analyzed. RESULTS: The incidence of fetal distress during second stage of labor was significantly higher in the epidural group (12.69 vs. 6.99%, P=0.02). The incidence of fetal distress during first stage of labor did not differ in both groups (10.53% vs. 8.74%, NS). Cesarean sections rate was similar in epidural and non-epidural group (17.7 vs. 18.2%, NS). Among vaginal deliveries duration of the first and second stage of labor was longer in epidural group (6.5+/-2.4 vs. 5.4+/-2.5 godz., P=0,000003 and 47.3+/-34.8 vs. 29.1+/-25.8 min., P=0.000003) and this was independent of period of time between onset of first stage of labor and epidural analgesia. Oxitocin use was significantly more frequent in the epidural group (20.6 vs. 10.3%, P<0.004). There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of instrumental vaginal deliveries, 1 and 5-minute Apgar scores, length of third stage of labor and perinatal blood loss in patients with and without epidural analgesia. Perinatal outcome did not depend on previous use of epidural analgesia or mode of analgesia for the operation in cesarean section subgroup. CONCLUSION: Epidural labor analgesia is associated with slower progress of labor but has no adverse effect on perinatal outcome and perinatal complications.     

A comparison between the effectiveness of epidural analgesia and parenteral pethidine during labor

The study was aimed to define parturients' opinion on either epidural analgesia or intravenous pethidine, and to determine the effect of both analgesics after delivery. We interviewed and examined 401 consecutive parturients who requested analgesia during the beginning of their active stage of labor. Of those, 131 women requested and underwent epidural analgesia, and 270 received parenteral pethidine. The pain experienced before admission of any analgesia, was significantly higher in the epidural group than in the parental group (mean visual analog scale (VAS) score 8.9 and 8.4, respectively; P=0.004). However, after analgesics, women from the epidural analgesia experienced significantly less pain during labor as compared to those receiving pethidine (mean VAS scores 5.05 vs. 9.14, respectively; p<0.001). The pain scores 24 h after labor were significantly lower in patients who underwent epidural analgesia (1.69 vs. 2.13, respectively; p<0.001). We conclude that epidural analgesia is more effective than parenteral analgesia in pain and discomfort relief. This method is helpful also the day after delivery. Thus, epidural analgesia should be strongly recommended to all patients who do not have any medical contraindications to this method of treatment.     

Epidural analgesia and its effect on umbilical artery flow velocity waveform patterns in uncomplicated labour and labour complicated by pregnancy-induced hypertension

Umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms were obtained using continuous-wave Doppler ultrasound to examine the effect of epidural analgesia on peak systolic/least diastolic ratio (A/B ratio) in 38 women in uncomplicated labour, and 12 women with pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH). In the uncomplicated group there was no significant change in A/B ratio after epidural analgesia, but in the PIH group there was significant correlation between the fall in mean blood pressure and the fall in A/B ratio at 30 min after induction of epidural analgesia (r = 0.85, p less than 0.001). This suggests that epidural analgesia in PIH is associated with a reduction in placental resistance and may be beneficial to the fetus.     

The effect of epidural analgesia upon fetal and neonatal status

The effect of epidural analgesia on the fetal and neonatal status was studied in 72 patients who received a standard epidural block during labor. Recordings were made of maternal blood pressure, fetal heart rate, and uterine contractions. Observations on the neonates continued to the day of discharge from the hospital. A control group of 100 patients who received either no analgesia during labor or a form of pain relief other than epidural block was also studied. The control patients were monitored for obstetric indications and therefore are not strictly comparable to the study group. The study group of patients was subdivided into 4 groups (SG1 to SG4). Twenty-four patients in SG2 received oxytocin and did not develop hypotension; 7 patients in SG3 did not receive oxytocin and developed hypotension; 20 patients in SG4 neither received oxytocin nor developed hypotension. Significant fetal heart rate (FHR) decelerations were seen in 55 per cent of the study patients; these occurred most frequently in those patients who developed hypotension (71 per cent) but also developed in 40 per cent of those patients whose blood pressure remained stable. The most common significant FHR pattern was that of late deceleration, occurring in 33.3 per cent of the study group of patients. Of the neonates from the study group of mothers, 9.7 per cent had low Apgar scores compared to 17 per cent of the control neonates. The majority recovered shortly after the 5 minute Apgar observation and continued normally until the day of discharge.     

Effect of lumbar epidural analgesia on lower urinary tract function in the immediate postpartum period

Summary. Urodynamic investigations including cystometry and electronic simultaneous urethro-cystometry were made in 27 primiparae between 2 and 5 days after delivery to assess possible effects of lumbar epidural analgesia on the function of the lower urinary tract. Three groups of patients were studied: 11 patients had vaginal delivery without epidural analgesia, 11 patients with similar obstetrical characteristics were delivered vaginally with epidural analgesia, and five others were delivered by caesarean section under epidural analgesia. The group of patients who were delivered vaginally under epidural analgesia had a significantly higher incidence ( n = 4) of hypotonic bladders as determined by cystometry than the group without epidural analgesia ( n = 0), ( P < 0 05). The maximum cystometric capacity was significantly greater ( P < 0.05) in the group who delivered vaginally with epidural analgesia than in the group without epidural analgesia, as well as the caesarean section group (with epidural analgesia), ( P < 0.01). Possible side effects of epidural analgesia implied by these results are discussed and a method for surveillance of urethro-vesical function both during labour and after parturition is proposed.     

Epidural analgesia for obstetrics: a maternal, fetal, and neonatal study

The effect of lumbar epidural (LE) and caudal epidural (CE) analgesia on the fetal heart rate and fetal acid-base status (pH and base excess) of 41 patients was studied during first- and second-stage analgesia in a controlled research delivery room environment. All patients had baseline parameters which made it possible to observe the effects of the epidural technique upon the fetal heart rate, pH, and base excess. Certain neonatal parameters were recorded to evaluate the epidural effect upon the neonate's postdelivery period. These included Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes, umbilical cord arterial and venous blood gases, and neonatal blood gases from the umbilical artery in the first hour after birth. There was an increase in late deceleration after epidural block despite segmental analgesia with minimal lidocaine dosages and the absence of hypotension. However, unless second-stage embarrassment or hypotension occurred, no significant deterioration of the acid-base status was noted. The greatest incidence of late deceleration was noted when epidural analgesia was combined with oxytocin. For the few toxemia patients studied, the epidural technique did not prove hazardous. These intrapartum regional analgesic techniques (LE and CE) do not appear to present a hazard to the normal fetus or the fetus at mild risk. Nevertheless, discretion would dictate that these techniques be restricted with evidence of combined antepartum and intrapartum fetal compromise.     

Effect of lumbar epidural analgesia on lower urinary tract function in the immediate postpartum period

Urodynamic investigations including cystometry and electronic simultaneous urethro-cystometry were made in 27 primiparae between 2 and 5 days after delivery to assess possible effects of lumbar epidural analgesia on the function of the lower urinary tract. Three groups of patients were studied: 11 patients had vaginal delivery without epidural analgesia, 11 patients with similar obstetrical characteristics were delivered vaginally with epidural analgesia, and five others were delivered by caesarean section under epidural analgesia. The group of patients who were delivered vaginally under epidural analgesia had a significantly higher incidence (n = 4) of hypotonic bladders as determined by cystometry than the group without epidural analgesia (n = 0), (P less than 0.05). The maximum cystometric capacity was significantly greater (P less than 0.05) in the group who delivered vaginally with epidural analgesia than in the group without epidural analgesia, as well as the caesarean section group (with epidural analgesia), (P less than 0.01). Possible side effects of epidural analgesia implied by these results are discussed and a method for surveillance of urethrovesical function both during labour and after parturition is proposed.     

Placental intervillous blood flow measured by inhaled 133Xe clearance in relation to induction of epidural analgesia.

A method of determining placental intervillous blood flow (IBF) using an inhaled 133Xe technique is described. The method was used to investigate the effect on IBF of epidural analgesia with an initial dose of 37.5 mg bupivacaine. There was no statistically significant reduction in IBF following the initial dose of bupivacaine in spite of a small but statistically significant reduction in mean blood pressure. There was no significant correlation between the change in mean blood pressure and the percentage change in IBF following epidural block although the single largest percentage reduction in IBF was associated with the largest fall in mean blood pressure.     

Maternal behavior toward her newborn infant. Potential modification by peridural analgesia or childbirth preparation

The effects of sophrology and epidural analgesia on early relationship between the mother and her child were studied on a simple of 190 deliveries. The mothers were observed during and just after delivery. Mothers who had been separated from their child before the end of the observation were excluded from the study. The patients had the choice between epidural analgesia or prenatal care with sophrology. Participation to prenatal courses has statistically a positive effect on the relation between the mother and her child (p less than 0.01). Instead, epidural analgesia and posture have very limited effect on this factor. However, a trend to more interaction is found in multipari and patients who didn't choose epidural analgesia.     

The effect of a rapid change in availability of epidural analgesia on the cesarean delivery rate: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to quantitatively estimate the effect of a rapid introduction or withdrawal of on-demand epidural analgesia on the cesarean delivery rate. STUDY DESIGN: MEDLINE and meeting abstracts were searched for studies reporting the cesarean delivery rate immediately before and after a rapid change in the availability of epidural analgesia. Nine studies reporting data on 37,753 patients were selected. Meta-analysis was performed to estimate the means and 95% confidence intervals for the changes in rates of total cesarean deliveries, cesarean deliveries among nulliparous women, cesarean deliveries for dystocia, and operative vaginal deliveries. RESULTS: There was no significant change in the overall cesarean delivery rate with an increase in the availability of epidural analgesia. Similarly, the rates of cesarean deliveries among nulliparous patients, of cesarean deliveries for dystocia, and of operative vaginal deliveries did not significantly differ between periods of high and low epidural analgesia availability. CONCLUSION: A rapid change in the availability of epidural analgesia is not associated with any increase in the cesarean delivery rate.     

The effect of ephedrine on intrapartum fetal heart rate after epidural analgesia

OBJECTIVE: Adverse fetal heart rate (FHR) changes occur frequently during the first 30 minutes after epidural analgesia. The aim of this study was to estimate whether intravenous administration of ephedrine during induction of epidural analgesia can reduce the frequency of adverse FHR changes. METHODS: We prospectively studied 145 term singleton deliveries where epidural analgesia was administered. The patients were randomly allocated before the administration of epidural analgesia to receive an intravenous infusion of 10 mg ephedrine, after epidural induction, followed by a continuous infusion for 60 minutes of 20 mg ephedrine (study group) or to receive no ephedrine (control group). The FHR tracing was evaluated for 20 minutes before and 40 minutes after initiating epidural analgesia. Demographic data and clinical and delivery outcome were assessed and compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Injection of ephedrine significantly reduced the rate of major FHR changes appearing 15-25 minutes after induction of epidural analgesia in the study group compared with the control group (2/72 compared with 11/73, respectively; P = .009). To avoid 1 case of adverse FHR changes, 6.8 women should be treated with ephedrine. Maternal and fetal characteristics and outcome and mode of delivery were similar in the 2 groups. Mean arterial pressure was significantly higher in the study group from the time of analgesia induction and during the subsequent 25 minutes. Maternal heart rate was transiently reduced in the study group only. CONCLUSION: Ephedrine administration during the time of epidural analgesia initiation can reduce the frequency of adverse FHR changes commonly observed immediately afterward.     

Comparative evaluation of carticaine and bupivacaine in epidural anesthesia in cesarean section

Lumbar epidural anaesthesia with Carticain (Ultracain) has been applied in 25 Caesarean Sections. The resulting data (waiting period, effective length and quality of the analgesia, blood pressure drop, postoperative phase, newborn state, side effects) have been compared with those of Bupivacain (Marcain) used for the same purpose. Carticain is fitted for purposes of obstetrical anaesthesia, even more than Bupivacain, owing to its slighter blood-pressure diminishing effect, and shorter waiting period.     

Epidural analgesia is associated with an increased incidence of postoperative complications in patients requiring an abdominal hysterectomy for early stage endometrial cancer

Objective

Analgesia and early quality of recovery may be improved by epidural analgesia. We aimed to assess the effect of receiving epidural analgesia on surgical adverse events and quality of life after laparotomy for endometrial cancer.

Methods

Patients were enrolled in an international, multicentre, prospective randomised trial of outcomes for laparoscopic versus open surgical treatment for the management of apparent stage I endometrial cancer (LACE trial).The current analysis focussed on patients who received an open abdominal hysterectomy via vertical midline incision only (n = 257), examining outcomes in patients who did (n = 108) and did not (n = 149) receive epidural analgesia.

Results

Baseline characteristics were comparable between patients with or without epidural analgesia. More patients without epidural (34%) ceased opioid analgesia 3–5 days after surgery compared to patients who had an epidural (7%; p < 0.01). Postoperative complications (any grade) occurred in 86% of patients with and in 66% of patients without an epidural (p < 0.01) but there was no difference in serious adverse events (p = 0.19). Epidural analgesia was associated with increased length of stay (up to 48 days compared to up to 34 days in the non-epidural group). There was no difference in postoperative quality of life up to six months after surgery.

Conclusions

Epidural analgesia was associated with an increase in any, but not serious, postoperative complications and length of stay after abdominal hysterectomy. Randomised controlled trials are needed to examine the effect of epidural analgesia on surgical adverse events, especially as the present data do not support a quality of life benefit with epidural analgesia.     

Obstetric analgesia and immunoreactive endorphin peptides in maternal plasma during labor

We studied the effect of obstetric analgesia on maternal plasma levels of immunoreactive endorphin peptides (ir-EP) during labor and the postpartum period in three groups of parturients: group I (n = 22) had no analgesia, group II (n = 20) received pethidine intramuscularly, and group III (n = 10) had continuous epidural analgesia. Initial levels of ir-EP were similar in all three groups. Patients without any medication and patients on pethidine showed a significant rise in ir-EP in late labor and at delivery. Epidural analgesia was characterized by constant levels of ir-EP during labor and an insignificant rise at delivery.     

Does the station of the fetal head during epidural analgesia affect labor and delivery?

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the station of the fetal head when lumbar epidural analgesia is administered influences the duration or the mode of delivery in low-risk laboring women. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 131 consecutive cases of low-risk parturients at term who requested intrapartum epidural analgesia. Obstetric outcome of 65 parturients who underwent epidural analgesia when the fetal head was low in the birth canal was compared to 66 patients whose fetal head station was above the ischial spine. RESULTS: Both groups were similar in their obstetric characteristics. Cervical dilatation when performing the epidural analgesia was similar in both groups. The duration of labor and mode of delivery, as well as percentage of malpositions, were not significantly different in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The station of the fetal head while initiating epidural analgesia does not influence the duration of labor or the mode of delivery. Therefore, there is no justification to delay epidural analgesia in labor until the presenting fetal part is engaged.