Poor outcome of the PCA and Harris-Galante hip prostheses. Randomized study of 171 arthroplasties with 9-year follow-up.

155 patients (171 hips) with a mean age of 50 years (24-64) were randomized to uncemented PCA (84 hips) or Harris-Galante type I (87 hips) total hip arthroplasty. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were done regularly. The improvements in the Harris hip and pain scores did not differ. Osteolysis developed in 5 PCA and 17 Harris-Galante hips. 13 hips in the PCA and 16 in the Harris-Galante (HG) group were revised because of mechanical failures and 1 hip (HG) because of infection after a mean follow-up of 9 years. Decreased 10-year survival rate, based on revision as end-point, was noted for the PCA (85%), compared with the Harris-Galante cup (99%). The corresponding survival rate of the PCA stem (96%) was higher than that observed for the Harris-Galante design (86%). When radiographic failures were included, the survival rates of the 4 different components dropped to between 73% and 94%. These findings indicate that further revisions will be necessary and continuous radiographic follow-up is indicated to enable revision before severe bone destruction has occurred. Although the PCA and the Harris-Galante designs differed as regards the survival of the individual components, the overall clinical and radiographic survival rates of these cementless total hip arthroplasties were poor.     

The Harris-Galante cementless THA: a 19- to 25-year follow-up study

The goal of this study was to evaluate the long-term survivorship of primary cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) using Harris-Galante porous I acetabular and Harris-Galante porous femoral components. From July 1985 to December 1991, we performed primary cementless THA on 76 hips (70 patients). Twenty-nine patients (31 hips) died due to causes unrelated to the THA, and 6 patients (7 hips) were lost to follow-up. Of 76 hips (70 patients) studied, 38 hips (35 patients) were available for follow-up at a mean 22.5 years (range, 19-25 years) postoperatively. Mean patient age at index procedure was 51.2 years (range, 42-65 years). Average Harris Hip Score was 40.5 points preoperatively and 85.8 points at final follow-up. No patient had an early or late postoperative deep infection. Radiographically, the acetabular component fixation was stable in all 38 hips. The femoral component was bone-ingrown in 26 hips, stable-fibrous in 10, and unstable in 2. One unstable hip required revision of the femoral component. Dissociation of the polyethylene liner occurred in 3 hips without fractures of the metal locking tines and required revision of the polyethylene liner and the articular head. A total of 4 hips had documented revision, and 1 femoral component failed radiographically. The survival rate with the endpoint defined as revision surgery and radiographic loosening was 86.8% at 22.5 years of follow-up. Mean polyethylene wear was 0.085 mm/year (range, 0.031-0.15 mm). This study found that the Harris-Galante porous I acetabular and Harris-Galante porous femoral components produce excellent long-term results.     

Revision of a cemented acetabular component to a cementless acetabular component. A ten to fourteen-year follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Although cementless acetabular components are routinely used in revision hip surgery, few investigators have evaluated the retention and efficacy of these components in the long term. In the current study, the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a series of arthroplasties performed by one surgeon with a cementless acetabular component were assessed at a minimum of ten years. METHODS: From 1986 through 1988, sixty-one consecutive revision total hip arthroplasties were performed in fifty-five patients because of aseptic failure of one or both components of a prosthesis in which both components had been cemented. Twenty-eight patients (thirty-two hips) were alive at a mean of 12.9 years (range, 11.5 to 14.3 years) after the operation. In all of the patients, the acetabular component was revised to a porous-coated Harris-Galante component inserted without cement, and the femoral component was revised to an Iowa component affixed with contemporary cementing techniques. The hips were evaluated clinically and radiographically at a minimum of ten years subsequent to the index revision. No hips were lost to follow-up. RESULTS: None of the acetabular components required revision because of aseptic loosening. Two hips (3%) demonstrated radiographic evidence of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component. The polyethylene liner was exchanged during the follow-up period in eight hips. CONCLUSION: After a minimum of ten years of follow-up, cementless acetabular fixation in revision hip arthroplasty had produced durable results that were markedly better than those reported for acetabular fixation with cement.     

Second-generation cementless total hip arthroplasty. Eight to eleven-year results.

BACKGROUND: Second-generation cementless femoral components were designed to provide more reliable ingrowth and to limit distal osteolysis by incorporating circumferential proximal ingrowth surfaces. We examined the eight to eleven-year results of total hip arthroplasty with a cementless, anatomically designed femoral component and a cementless hemispheric acetabular component. METHODS: Ninety-two consecutive primary total hip arthroplasties with implantation of a femoral component with a circumferential proximal porous coating (Anatomic Hip) and a cementless hemispheric porous-coated acetabular component (Harris-Galante II) were performed in eighty-five patients. These patients were prospectively followed clinically and radiographically. Six patients (seven hips) died and five patients (seven hips) were lost to follow-up, leaving seventy-four patients (seventy-eight hips) who had been followed for a mean of ten years (range, eight to eleven years). The mean age at the time of the arthroplasty was fifty-two years. RESULTS: The mean preoperative Harris hip score of 51 points improved to 94 points at the time of final follow-up; 86% of the hips had a good or excellent result. Thigh pain was reported as mild to severe after seven hip arthroplasties. No femoral component was revised for any reason, and none were loose radiographically at the time of the last follow-up. Two hips underwent acetabular revision (one because of dislocation and one because of loosening). Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed with revision or loosening of any component as the end point. The ten-year survival rate was 96.4% +/- 2.1% for the total hip prosthesis, 100% for the femoral component, and 96.4% +/- 2.1% for the acetabular component. Radiolucencies adjacent to the nonporous portion of the femoral component were seen in sixty-eight (93%) of the -seventy-three hips with complete radiographic follow-up. Femoral osteolysis proximal to the lesser trochanter was noted in four hips (5%). No osteolysis was identified distal to the lesser trochanter. Periacetabular osteolysis was identified in twelve hips (16%). Five patients underwent exchange of the acetabular liner because of polyethylene wear. CONCLUSIONS: This second-generation cementless, anatomically designed femoral component provided excellent clinical and radiographic results with a 100% survival rate at ten years. The circumferential porous coating of this implant improved ingrowth and prevented distal osteolysis at a mean of ten years after the arthroplasty.     

Total hip arthroplasty performed without cement in patients with femoral head osteonecrosis who are less than 50 years old

Seventy-two cementless total hip arthroplasties were performed by a single surgeon in 58 patients with the diagnosis of femoral head osteonecrosis. All patients were less than 50 years old (mean, 37 years). The mean follow-up was 84 months with a minimum of 48 months. Good-to-excellent results were maintained at final follow-up in 94% of the hips. Revision rate was 1.5% each for the cups and the stems. Mechanical failure rate was 7.6% for the cups, and 6% for the stems. If the results were analyzed excluding the data from the group of patients who received the Mittelmeier prostheses, the mechanical failure rates for the cups was 0% and for the stems was 4.2%. The probability of survival for the entire series using revision as the endpoint was 96.9% at 11 years. Survival probability decreased to 88.5% if radiographic failures were included. Excluding the Mittelmeier prostheses, survival probability was estimated to be 100% for the cups using both revision and radiographic failures as endpoints; for the stems, the survival probability was 98.0% using revision as the endpoint and 95.8% including radiographic failures. Femoral osteolysis was observed in 1.5% of the hips. No hip had acetabular osteolysis. No measurements of polyethylene wear were attempted in this study. These results appeared superior to total hip arthroplasties done with early cementing techniques in this population of young patients with femoral head osteonecrosis.     

Minimum ten-year results of primary bipolar hip arthroplasty for degenerative arthritis of the hip

BACKGROUND: Bipolar hip arthroplasty has been advocated by some as an alternative to total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of degenerative arthritis of the hip. We sought to assess the results of this procedure at our institution after a minimum duration of follow-up of ten years. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of 152 patients (173 hips) who underwent primary bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative arthritis of the hip with a cementless femoral component between 1983 and 1987. Of the original cohort of 152 patients, ninety-two patients (104 hips) were available for clinical and radiographic review at a mean of 12.2 years postoperatively. At the time of the latest follow-up, self-administered Harris hip questionnaires were used to assess pain, mobility, activity level, and overall satisfaction with the procedure. Biplanar hip radiographs were made to evaluate bipolar shell migration, osteolysis, and femoral stem fixation. RESULTS: At the time of the latest follow-up, nineteen patients (nineteen hips) had undergone revision to total hip arthroplasty because of mechanical failure, and three patients (three hips) were awaiting revision because of symptomatic radiographic mechanical failure. Twelve acetabular revisions were performed or scheduled for the treatment of pelvic osteolysis or protrusio acetabuli secondary to component migration. Acetabular reconstruction required bone-grafting, an oversized shell, and/or a pelvic reconstruction ring. The overall rate of mechanical failure was 21.2% (twenty-two of 104 hips), with 91% (twenty) of the twenty-two failures involving the acetabular component. Reaming of the acetabulum at the time of the index arthroplasty was associated with a 6.4-fold greater risk of revision. The rate of implant survival, with revision because of mechanical failure as the end point, was 94.2% for femoral components and 80.8% for acetabular components at a mean of 12.2 years. Of the remaining sixty-nine patients (eighty-one hips) in whom the original prosthesis was retained, seventeen patients (24.6%) rated the pain as moderate to severe. Nearly 30% of patients with an intact prosthesis required analgesics on a regular basis. Radiographs were available for fifty-eight hips (including all of the hips with moderate to severe pain) after a minimum duration of follow-up of ten years; twenty-eight of these fifty-eight hips had radiographic evidence of acetabular component migration. CONCLUSIONS: This bipolar cup, when used for hemiarthroplasty in patients with symptomatic arthritis of the hip, was associated with unacceptably high rates of pain, migration, osteolysis, and the need for revision to total hip arthroplasty, especially when the acetabulum had been reamed. To the extent that these findings can be generalized to similar implant designs with conventional polyethylene, we do not recommend bipolar hemiarthroplasty as the primary operative treatment for degenerative arthritis of the hip.     

Cementless total hip arthroplasty in Chinese patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head

This study was designed to evaluate the midterm (> or = 5 years) clinical and radiographic outcomes of the cementless total hip arthroplasty in 64 Chinese patients (72 hips), which revealed that the mean Harris hip score increased from an average of 44.0 points before operation to 92.4 points at the last follow-up. Excellent results were achieved in 60 hips (83%). No loosening of the components was observed radiographically. No revision of the femoral components was required. Only one focal area of pelvic osteolysis in 1 hip (1%), which requires a revision, and some small focal areas of femoral osteolysis in 12 hips (17%) were observed. The mean linear wear rate was 0.125 mm/y. The survival rate of the acetabular and femoral components for radiographic loosening was 100% (95% confidence interval, 0.93-1.0) and for revision was 98.61% (95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.0). This study indicated that the cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head has a satisfactory midterm clinical and radiographic outcomes, but the long-term effect should be further studied.     

Fifteen-Year to Twenty-Year Results of Cementless Harris-Galante Porous Femoral and Harris-Galante Porous I and II Acetabular Components

This study examined long-term survivorship of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) using cementless Harris-Galante porous femoral and Harris-Galante porous I or II acetabular components. Of 113 hips (101 patients) studied, 60 hips (53 patients) were available for follow-up at a mean of 17.2 years after surgery. A total of 10 hips had documented revision, and 2 hips had failed radiographically. The average Harris hip score was 82. Radiographically, 12 hips demonstrated eccentric wear, 8 had osteolysis, and 1 had a broken tine. The overall survival rate was 87.7%; the mean volumetric wear rate was 74.96 mm³; and the mean polyethylene linear penetration rate was 0.153 mm/y, similar to that of well-cemented THA in other series. This long-term outcome for an early-generation cementless THA is promising and provides a standard by which to judge the newer generation of cementless implants.     

Acetabular reconstruction with impacted morcellized cancellous bone autograft and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty: a 10- to 17-year follow-up study

During the period 1979 through 1986, 69 acetabular reconstructions in 63 patients were performed with the use of autologous morcellized bone-grafts because of acetabular bone stock loss. Nine cases (10 hips) were lost to follow-up. Eleven patients (12 hips) died <10 years after surgery; none had a revision. The results for the remaining 43 patients (47 hips) were reviewed at an average interval of 12.3 years (range, 10-17 years). No preoperative Harris hip score was available. The average Harris hip score at follow-up was 88 (range, 60-100). Radiographically, all grafts united. One hip developed a deep infection. Three other hips (6%) were revised because of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component. An additional 3 acetabular components were considered radiographic failures. Excluding the infected case, the overall survival rate of these acetabular reconstructions with a revision as endpoint was 94% at an average follow-up of 12.3 years. Reconstruction of acetabular bone stock loss with autologous morcellized bone-grafts is an attractive technique with a good potential for long-term success.     

Poor results of the cementless total hip arthroplasty with a nonporous coated acetabular component: AcSys Shearer Cup

Background This study followed patients for a minimum of 7 years after primary total hip arthroplasty using cementless acetabular components and evaluated their outcomes. Methods We followed 73 patients (75 hips), who had undergone total hip arthroplasty with cementless nonporous coated acetabular components (3M AcSys Shearer Cup) for a mean of 9.8 years (range 7–13 years). There were 61 women and 12 men with a mean age of 53 years (range 27–69 years) at surgery. The diagnosis was primary osteoarthritis in 9 hips, osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia in 58 hips, osteonecrosis of the femoral head in 6 hips, and rheumatoid arthritis in 2 hips. Results Three cups were revised because of aseptic loosening, and one cup was revised following removal of the prosthesis due to deep infection. Radiographic loosening was observed in 22 hips at the latest follow-up. The survival rate at 10 years was 94.7% with revision as the endpoint and 72% with radiographic loosening as the endpoint. The Merle d'Aubigné and Postel hip score showed significant improvement postoperatively and was maintained well even in cases showing radiographic loosening. Conclusions The intermediate radiological results with the AcSys Shearer Cup were unsatisfactory because of the high loosening rate, although the revision rate was low. The nonporous outer surface and the poor fixation mechanism between the metal shell and liner may have contributed to the high failure rate. Regular radiological review is recommended when this cup is used because early loosening is often painless.     

Long-term results of total hip arthroplasty with a cemented custom-designed swan-neck femoral component for congenital dislocation or severe dysplasia: a follow-up note

BACKGROUND: This follow-up study updates the results in a consecutive series of nineteen cemented total hip replacements with a swan-neck femoral component in patients with congenital dislocation or severe hip dysplasia. The series was previously reported on in 1993. METHODS: The patients were petite, with an average height of 152 cm and an average weight of 50 kg, and the femoral canals could not accommodate an off-the-shelf femoral component. Sixteen of the nineteen hips were available for follow-up at an average of 13.3 years (range, eleven to twenty years). Fourteen hips had up-to-date clinical and radiographic examinations. RESULTS: At the time of the latest follow-up, thirteen hips were rated as excellent; two, as good; and one, as a failure because of loosening of both components requiring revision eleven years after the index operation. Another hip required acetabular revision because of loosening fifteen years after the index operation. The rates of femoral and acetabular component revision were 6% and 12.5%, respectively. Radiographic analysis demonstrated that no femoral component was loose. One cup was definitely loose at 19.5 years, and three cups were possibly loose at an average of fourteen years. The radiographic rate of acetabular loosening was 33%. The total rate of cup failure (radiographic loosening and revision) was 43%. CONCLUSIONS: The excellent clinical and radiographic results associated with the swan-neck femoral component, and the 94% rate of survival, at an average of 13.3 years (range, eleven to twenty years) indicate that the biomechanical objectives of this custom-designed prosthesis for patients with congenital dislocation or severe hip dysplasia were met. On the basis of this favorable long-term experience, we still use this prosthesis when the anatomic abnormality cannot be adequately addressed by use of a commercially available prosthetic component.     

Hybrid total hip arthroplasty in patients under the age of fifty: A five- to ten-year follow-up

In 37 patients, 45 total hip replacements were performed using contemporary cementing techniques, an uncemented Harris-Galante I acetabular component and a cemented precoated Iowa femoral component in patients under the age of 50 at the time of their surgery; 36 patients with 43 hybrid hips were living, 1 patient with 2 hybrid hips was decreased. No patients were lost to follow-up. At 5- to 10-year follow-up, eight hips were revised for aseptic loosening. No acetabular components, and eight femoral components (18%) were revised for aseptic loosening. When looking at radiographic results, including revision as well as those components that were probably or definitely loose on radiographs, 0 acetabular components and 11 femoral components (24%) were radiographically loose. These results demonstrate the excellent durability of the uncemented Harris-Galante acetabular component in the younger patient. However, the Iowa grit-blasted methyl methacrylate precoated femoral component had a magnitude increase in the prevalence of revision for aseptic femoral loosening when compared to the senior author's long-term Charnley results in this age group. The authors attribute the failure to the rough surface finish applied to the femoral component. However, the polymethyl methacrylate proximal precoating and the femoral component design may also contribute to the femoral failures.     

Revision total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years old. Clinical and radiologic results after 4 years

Since 1979, all revision total hip arthroplasties performed in Sweden have been entered into a prospective multicenter study. Between 1979 and 1982, 65 patients (67 hips) younger than 55 years old required revision arthroplasty because of aseptic loosening. These patients were followed clinically and radiographically for 2-6 years (mean, 4 years). Thirteen patients requiring a second revision because of a recurrent aseptic loosening and one because of subluxations were classified as failures and were not included in the final follow-up study. In the remaining 52 hips (50 patients), the results, rated by the Harris hip score, were good or excellent in 15 hips (29%), fair in 9 hips (17%), and poor in 28 hips (54%). Early complications were rare. Ten hips in 10 patients had radiographic signs of gross loosening of the acetabular or femoral component. mechanical failure, defined as gross loosening or a second revision, was identified in 36% of hips included in the study (n = 67). Revision hip arthroplasty using cement in young and middle-aged patients with cemented primary arthroplasty gave a high rate of failure, because of aseptic loosening. The use of alternative methods and techniques must be explored for revision surgery in younger patients.     

Total hip arthroplasty with a cementless acetabular component and a cemented femoral component in the treatment of Chinese patients with femoral head necrosis

The purpose of this study was to evaluate midterm clinical and radiographic outcomes associated with hybrid total hip arthroplasty in a consecutive series of 86 Chinese patients (93 hips) with osteonecrosis of the femoral head, which revealed that the mean Harris hip score increased from 39 +/- 6.0 points before operation to 90.4 +/- 4.6 points at the latest follow-up. There was pelvic osteolysis in one hip (1%), which required revision, and some small focal areas of femoral osteolysis in 12 hips (13%) were observed. The mean linear wear rate was 0.143 +/- 0.05 mm/y (0.02-0.45 mm/y). No loosening of the components was observed radiographically. The survival rate of the acetabular and femoral components for revision was 98% (95% confidence interval, 0.96-1.0) and 100% (95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.0). Hybrid total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head had a satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcome at a minimum 5 years of follow-up. Because polyethylene wear and osteolysis cannot be avoided, the long-term effect should be further studied.     

Cementless acetabular fixation at fifteen years. A comparison with the same surgeon's results following acetabular fixation with cement

BACKGROUND: Loosening of the acetabular component is the major long-term problem associated with total hip arthroplasty with cement. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the minimum thirteen-year results associated with cementless acetabular components that had been inserted by a single surgeon and to compare them with the results associated with cemented acetabular components that had been inserted by the same surgeon. METHODS: One hundred and twenty consecutive, nonselected primary total hip replacements were performed in 108 patients with use of a Harris-Galante-I cementless acetabular component and a cemented femoral component with a 28-mm head. The patients were evaluated clinically with use of a standard terminology questionnaire, and they were evaluated radiographically for loosening, component migration, wear, and osteolysis. The rates of revision for aseptic loosening and radiographic evidence of loosening for this cohort were compared with the rates for four previously reviewed consecutive series of hips in which the acetabular component had been inserted with cement. All patients were managed by the same surgeon, were followed for thirteen to fifteen years, and were evaluated with use of the same two criteria (revision and loosening) as the end points for Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients (seventy-two hips) were living and forty-two patients (forty-eight hips) had died after thirteen to fifteen years of follow-up. No acetabular component had been revised because of aseptic loosening, and no acetabular component had migrated. With revision of the acetabular component for any reason as the end point, the survival rate was 81% +/- 8% at fifteen years. With revision of the acetabular component for clinical failure (osteolysis, wear, loosening, or dislocation) as the end point, the survival rate was 94% +/- 8% at fifteen years. Among the seventy hips with at least thirteen years of radiographic follow-up, five had pelvic osteolysis and three had had revision of a well-fixed acetabular component because of pelvic osteolysis secondary to polyethylene wear. The mean linear wear rate was 0.15 mm/yr (0.12 mm/yr when one outlier was excluded). CONCLUSIONS: In terms of fixation, Harris-Galante-I cementless acetabular components performed better than did cemented 22-mm-inner-diameter Charnley acetabular components as well as 28-mm-inner-diameter all-polyethylene and metal-backed acetabular components that had been inserted by the same surgeon. However, the rate of wear was greater in association with the Harris-Galante-I cementless components than it was in association with the Charnley cemented all-polyethylene components.     

The Harris-Galante porous-coated, hemispherical, polyethylene-lined acetabular component in patients under 50 years of age: a 12- to 16-year review

We have reviewed 70 Harris-Galante uncemented acetabular components implanted as hybrid hip replacements with cemented stems between 1991 and 1995 in 53 patients whose mean age was 40 years (19 to 49). The mean follow-up was for 13.6 years (12 to 16) with no loss to follow-up. We assessed the patients both clinically and radiologically. The mean Oxford hip score was 20 (12 to 46) and the mean Harris hip score 81 (37 to 100) at the final review. Radiologically, 27 hips (39%) had femoral osteolysis, 13 (19%) acetabular osteolysis, and 31 (44%) radiolucent lines around the acetabular component. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed for the outcomes of revision of the acetabular component, revision of the component and polyethylene liner, and impending revision for progressive osteolysis. The cumulative survival for revision of the acetabular component was 94% (95% confidence interval 88.4 to 99.7), for the component and liner 84% (95% confidence interval 74.5 to 93.5) and for impending revision 55.3% (95% confidence interval 40.6 to 70) at 16 years. Uncemented acetabular components with polyethylene liners undergo silent lysis and merit regular long-term radiological review.     

Factors influencing the longer-term survival of uncemented acetabular components used in total hip revisions

BACKGROUND: There are few longer-term follow-up reports of the results and complications of the use of cementless acetabular components in revision hip arthroplasty. In this study, we analyzed the clinical and radiographic results to determine the factors that affect longer-term survival of titanium-fiber-metal-coated acetabular components. METHODS: During a fourteen-year period, one surgeon performed 211 consecutive unselected cementless acetabular revisions in 194 patients with a mean age of sixty-two years. The same technique was used for all revisions: the component was impacted and was fixed with multiple screws, and bone deficiencies were augmented with supplemental bone graft. Both the acetabular and the femoral components were revised in 142 hips, whereas an isolated acetabular revision was performed in sixty-nine hips. All 211 revisions were included in a survivorship analysis to twelve years. Prospectively determined clinical results in 135 hips and radiographic results in 131 hips were available at a minimum of five years postoperatively. RESULTS: Seven acetabular components were removed: three, because of infection; one, because of recurrent dislocation; and three, because of mechanical loosening. There was asymptomatic radiographic loosening of one additional acetabular component, for a total rate of aseptic loosening of 2%. The twelve-year prosthetic survival rate was 95% (95% confidence interval, 91% to 99%), with failure defined as component removal for any reason. There was no significant difference in the rate of survival of the cup or femoral component between the sixty-nine hips treated with isolated acetabular revision and the 142 hips in which both components were revised. There was a significant difference in the rate of dislocation between the hips treated with isolated acetabular revision (dislocation in fourteen hips, 20%) and those in which both components had been revised (dislocation in eleven hips, 8%; p = 0.03), but there was no difference in component survival if a dislocation occurred. There was a significant association between a patient weight of >82 kg and acetabular failure (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: This titanium-fiber-metal-coated hemispheric component fixed with multiple screws had a twelve-year survival rate of 95% when used in an unselected, consecutive series of acetabular revisions. The rate of dislocation was significantly higher in the patients treated with isolated acetabular revision, and routine postoperative bracing is now recommended for that group.     

Cementless acetabular revision for aseptic failure of cemented hip arthroplasty

This study is a 5- to 11-year retrospective followup of 40 hips in 33 patients with cementless acetabular revision for aseptic failure of a cemented total hip arthroplasty. A porous coated, Harris-Galante acetabular component was used in all revisions. Thirty-eight of the 40 hips received acetabular bone grafting at revision. The mean Harris Hip Score improved from 51 points just before the index cementless revision to 87 points at the most recent followup. Twenty-nine of 40 (73%) hips were classified as having a good or excellent result. Radiolucencies were observed in seven of the 40 (18%) hips at the most recent followup, but none of these radiolucencies were complete or progressive. Five of the 40 (13%) hips were rated as failures and required repeat revision. Two (5%) of these failures were caused by aseptic loosening, with both hips having severe acetabular bone damage at the time of the index revision. This failure rate for aseptic loosening was less than that reported for cemented acetabular revision, thereby confirming the efficacy of cementless acetabular components in revision hip surgery in the intermediate term.     

Cementless acetabular reconstruction and structural bone-grafting in dysplastic hips

BACKGROUND: Studies of acetabular reconstruction with use of cement and bulk bone graft have demonstrated increasing rates of cup failure in patients with dysplastic hips seven years after total hip arthroplasty. Comparable data on the long-term results of bulk bone-grafting done in conjunction with cementless implants are limited. The aim of this study was to review the clinical and radiographic results of autologous bulk bone-grafting in conjunction with a cementless cup. METHODS: From 1987 to 1992, forty-seven patients (forty women and seven men, with an average age of 50.4 years) who had developmental dysplasia of the hip underwent fifty-six total hip arthroplasties and received a structural graft in combination with a cementless Harris-Galante type-I cup. All patients were followed prospectively. In fifty-five hips, implant migration was measured with single-image radiographic analysis. RESULTS: After an average duration (and standard deviation) of 10.2 +/- 2.9 years, three patients (four hips) had died. In the surviving patients, four implants had been revised and two had radiographic evidence of loosening. With use of revision and loosening as end points, the eleven-year survival rates were 91.6% and 88.9%, respectively. Of the fifty implants that had no loosening, fourteen had measurable cup migration, thirty-five had no migration, and one implant could not be measured. All migrations but one were progressive. With loosening used as the end point, the survival rate at eleven years was 100% for the implants with no migration; however, the survival rate for the cups that had migrated was 69.3% (p = 0.0012). CONCLUSIONS: The eleven-year survival rate for the spherical press-fit cups in combination with bulk bone-grafting is satisfactory, given the complexity of these reconstructions. However, the difference between the survival of the implants that had migrated and those that had not was significant. We expect that the thirteen implants with progressive acetabular migration at the time of the latest follow-up are at risk for loosening, which will increase the revision rate for this series in the coming years.     

The fate of revised uncemented acetabular components in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

The results of patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had revision hip arthroplasty have been studied infrequently. The purpose of this study was to review the authors' clinical and radiographic experiences and outcomes with revision hip arthroplasty. Revision total hip arthroplasties were done on 28 patients (30 hips). All hips had morselized bone grafting and four hips had bulk allografts for segmental defects. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 50 years (range, 20-74 years). Patients were followed up for 4 to 15 years (mean, 7 years). At the latest followup, 14 hips (13 patients) of the 30 hips (47%) had good and excellent Harris hip score ratings. Mechanical failures included six hips (five patients) that had revision arthroplasty and two hips (two patients) that had resection arthroplasty. Six other hips (five patients) had poor Harris hip score ratings. The Kaplan-Meier survivorship curve for failure of the acetabular component revealed an 89% chance of survivorship curve for failure of the acetabular component revealed an 89% chance of survival at 60 months and a 44% chance of survival at 108 months. Based on the results of this study, revision hip arthroplasty for acetabular loosening with a cementless acetabular prosthesis has a low rate of success in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.