Long-term follow-up of common bile duct diameter after endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with common bile duct stones

Background and Aims  

To determine the time to normalization of common bile duct (CBD) diameter after endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction in patients with choledocholithiasis.     

Late biliary complications after endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones in patients older than 65 years of age with gallbladder in situ

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the nature and the frequency of biliary complications after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones in elderly patients with gallbladder in situ. METHODS: Between 1991 and 1993, 169 consecutive patients with gallbladder in situ, older than 65 years (79 +/- 8) had an endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis. Information on the early (<1 month) and late biliary complications, treatment and mortality were obtained by mail or phone calls from patients and general practitioners. Long-term data were obtained for 139 patients (82%). Mean follow-up was 56.5 months (80 months for patients still alive at the end of the study). RESULTS: Early complications occurred in 13 patients (10.8%). Seven patients had acute cholecystitis, present before the procedure in all cases; all were treated by surgery. Other early complications included cholangitis (n =7), mild acute pancreatitis (n =3), bleeding (n =1), perforation (n =1), biliary colic (n =1), pneumopathy (n =1) and bradycardia (n =1), all treated medically. Forty patients underwent early cholecystectomy, and 5 died during the first month without biliary disease. Late complications were thus assessed in 94 patients and occurred in 13 (14%), i.e around 2% per year. Complications were acute cholangitis (n=4), biliary pain (n =4), cholecystitis (n =2), abdominal pain (n =2) and jaundice due to sphincterotomy stenosis (n =1). Five patients had cholecystectomy, 1 a radiological drainage and 7 were treated medically. No death due to a biliary complication was observed. The presence of gallstones, the absence of gallbladder opacification at cholangiography were not prognostic factors for the recurrence of biliary symptoms. 65 patients (50%) died without biliary disease during the follow-up (actuarial death rate 10.5% per year). CONCLUSION: Late biliary complications after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for choledocholithiasis in patients with gallbladder in situ are rare (2% per year). Prophylactic cholecystectomy after sphincterotomy does not seem warranted in elderly patients, because of rare recurrent biliary symptoms, low mortality rate, and limited life expectancy.     

Endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones in patients 90 years of age and older

BACKGROUND: Little information is available on the outcomes of endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis in patients of advanced age (>/=90 years). METHODS: Endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed for choledocholithiasis in 22 patients aged 90 years or more (group A) and 381 aged 70 to 89 years (group B). Clinical features and early outcomes of endoscopic sphincterotomy were compared between the two groups. In group A, long-term results for a mean follow-up period of 33 months were assessed. RESULTS: Group A patients had a higher incidence of symptoms, acute cholangitis and concomitant diseases, as well as larger and more numerous gallstones than did group B patients. Endoscopic sphincterotomy was technically successful in 100% of group A patients and 98% of group B patients. The rate of early complications was low in both groups: 5% in group A and 7% in group B. No deaths related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography occurred in group A patients. Complete stone clearance was achieved in 86% of group A patients and 95% of group B patients. Group A required an emergency procedure, general anesthesia, multiple sessions, mechanical lithotripsy, and permanent biliary stent placement more frequently than group B. Late complications occurred in 5% of group A patients. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic sphincterotomy is safe and effective for the treatment of choledocholithiasis in patients 90 years of age or older. Biliary stent placement is a reasonable alternative treatment when stones prove to be difficult to extract.     

Risk factors predictive of late complications after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones: long-term (more than 10 years) follow-up study

OBJECTIVE: Widespread use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has extended the indications for endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) to young patients with choledocholithiasis; however, long-term results of ES and risk factors for late complications are largely unknown. METHODS: Between 1977 and 1990, 145 patients aged 60 yr or younger underwent ES for choledocholithiasis. Long-term outcomes of ES were investigated in the year 2000, and prognostic factors for late complications were multivariately analyzed. RESULTS: Long-term information was available in 135 cases (93.1%), with a median overall follow-up duration of 14.5 yr (range, 6.5-22.3 yr). There were neither biliary malignancies nor deaths attributable to biliary disease. Sixteen patients (11.9%) developed late complications, including choledochal complications (stone recurrence and/or cholangitis; 14 patients) and acute cholecystitis (two of 32 patients with the gallbladder in situ). Multivariate analysis identified two independent risk factors for choledochal complications: bile duct diameter > or = 15 mm and brown pigment stones at the initial ES. Choledochal complications were endoscopically manageable. All recurrent stones were brown pigment stones. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 12% of patients develop late complications after ES, but retreatment with ERCP is effective. ES is a reasonable alternative even in young patients with choledocholithiasis. Careful follow-up is necessary, however, particularly for patients with a dilated bile duct or brown pigment stones.     

Composition of common bile duct stones in Chinese patients during and after endoscopic sphincterotomy

AIM: Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) is a well-established therapeutic modality for the removal of common bile duct (CBD) stones. After ES there are still around 10% of patients that experience recurrent CBD stones. The aim of this study is to investigate the composition of CBD stones before and after ES and its clinical significance in Chinese patients. METHODS: From January 1996 to December 2003, 735 patients with CBD stones received ES at Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital and stone specimens from 266 patients were sent for analysis. Seventy-five patients had recurrent CBD stones and stone specimens from 44 patients were sent for analysis. The composition of the stones was analyzed by infrared (IR) spectrometry and they were classified as cholesterol or bilirubinate stones according to the predominant composition. Clinical data were analyzed. RESULTS: In the initial 266 stone samples, 217 (82%) were bilirubinate stones, 42 (16%) were cholesterol stones, 3 were calcium carbonate stones, 4 were mixed cholesterol and bilirubinate stones. Patients with bilirubinate stones were significantly older than patients with cholesterol stones (66±13 years vs56±17 years, P= 0.001). In the 44 recurrent stone samples, 38 (86%) were bilirubinate stones, 3 (7%) were cholesterol stones, and 3 were mixed cholesterol and bilirubinate stones. In 27 patients, both initial and recurrent stone specimens can be obtained, 23 patients had bilirubinate stones initially and 2 became cholesterol stones in the recurrent attack. In the four patients with initial cholesterol stones, three patients had bilirubinate stones and one patient had a cholesterol stone in the recurrent attack. CONCLUSION: Bilirubinate stone is the predominant composition of initial or recurrent CBD stone in Chinese patients. The composition of CBD stones may be different from initial stones after ES.     

Current management of the gallbladder after endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones

Background: Traditionally, a cholecystectomy is performed after successful endoscopic sphincterotomy and removal of common bile duct (CBD) stones, except in patients of advanced age or with substantial comorbidity. In practice, however, the gallbladder is left in situ more frequently now in patients without contraindications for surgery. The criteria by which patients are selected for an elective cholecystectomy are unclear. The aim of the present study was to establish the proportion of patients for whom a “wait-and-see” strategy was advised and to determine which, if any, patient characteristics had influenced this decision. Methods: This study included 71 patients, all younger than 80 years of age, with both CBD stones and a gallbladder containing stones in whom endoscopic clearance of bile duct stones was achieved. Results: Three patients underwent a cholecystectomy within 1 week because of acute cholecystitis. Among the remaining 68 patients, cholecystectomy was recommended for 42 patients and a wait-and-see strategy was advised for 26 patients. Patient characteristics were identical in both groups except for the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA) score. The ASA score was higher in the wait-and-see group, but 69% of the patients in this group had an ASA score of I or II. Six patients in the wait-and-see group had symptoms; five patients underwent cholecystectomy. The outcome of surgery was no worse in this group than in the cholecystectomy group. Conclusions: Selection of patients for either elective cholecystectomy or wait-and-see was not based on established criteria but mainly dependent on preference of the specialist. The outcome of surgery, indicated in 23% of the patients in the wait-and-see group was comparable with elective cholecystectomy. A controlled trial comparing both treatment options in patients younger than 80 years of age should be performed. (Gastrointest Endosc 1997;46:514-9.)     

Early postoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy for retained common bile duct stones

Endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed within 28 days after cholecystectomy in 20 patients with retained common bile duct stones, of whom 15 (75%) underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy within the first week of surgery. Stone extraction was successful in all patients and no immediate complications were noted. Early endoscopic sphincterotomy for retained common bile duct stones was safe and effective in the early postoperative period.     

Risk factors for recurrence of primary bile duct stones after endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy (EST) is a well-established procedure for bile duct stone extraction. Bile duct stones can be classified as primary or secondary. However, few data are available on the recurrence of primary and secondary bile duct stones after EST. Therefore risk factors for the recurrence of primary bile duct stones after EST were prospectively studied. METHODS: Between 1991 and 1997, 61 patients underwent EST for primary bile duct stones. All met the following criteria: (1) previous cholecystectomy without bile duct exploration, (2) detection of bile duct stones at least 2 years after initial cholecystectomy. Mean follow-up was 2.2 years. Fourteen patients were lost to follow-up. The recurrence of primary bile duct stones was defined as the detection of bile duct stones no sooner than 6 months after complete clearance of primary bile duct stones. RESULTS: The overall recurrence rate of primary bile duct stones was 21% (10 of 47). Two significant risk factors for recurrence were identified by multivariate analysis: (1) patients with a bile duct diameter of 13 mm or greater after stone removal had recurrences more frequently than those with a duct diameter of 13 mm or less, and (2) patients whose papilla was located on the inner rim or deep within a diverticulum, so that the papillary orifice was not visible endoscopically, had more frequent recurrences than patients with a papilla outside the diverticulum, or no peripapillary diverticulum. CONCLUSION: The independent risk factors for recurrence of primary bile duct stones were sustained dilation of the bile duct even after complete removal of stones and location of the papilla on the inner rim or deep within a diverticulum.     

Long-term follow-up study of patients after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis

Late complications have been examined in 96 patients consecutively treated for choledocholithiasis by endoscopic sphincterotomy in the years 1976 to 1980. Forty-four of the patients (46%) had the gallbladder in situ. Patients treated for short-term complications--that is, in the 1st month after sphincterotomy--are not included in this study. The mean length of follow-up study was 4.1 years (range, 2 months to 8 years and 9 months). Late bile duct symptoms occurred in seven patients (7%): three (6.8%) in patients with the gallbladder in situ and four (7.6%) in cholecystectomized patients. Stones were found in the common bile duct in three of these patients, one with and two without the gallbladder. The median duration from sphincterotomy to late complication was 8 months (range, 2 months to 5 years). Six of the patients had cholangitis, and the seventh had jaundice with abdominal pain. Two of the patients died of their complications. In conclusion, our results indicate that the frequency of late complications to endoscopic sphincterotomy is low and apparently independent of possible prior cholecystectomy.     

Comparison of endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones

Endoscopic treatment for bile duct stones is low-invasive and currently considered as the first choice of the treatment. For the treatment of bile duct stones, papillary treatment is necessary, and the treatments used at the time are broadly classified into two types; endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation where bile duct closing part is dilated with a balloon and endoscopic sphincterotomy(EST) where bile duct closing part is incised. Both procedures have advantages and disadvantages. Golden standard is EST, however, there are patients with difficulty for EST, thus we must select the procedure based on understanding of the characteristics of the procedure, and patient backgrounds.     

Prospective comparative study of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of large bile duct stones in patients above 45 years of age

Abstract Objective. Although endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) with limited endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) showed excellent outcomes for treatment of large bile duct stones, hemorrhage and recurrence of stones are problematic complications. Recent studies suggest that EPLBD alone is safe and effective for removal of large bile duct stones. This study aimed to determine the therapeutic outcomes and safety of EPLBD, compared with ES, for removal of large bile duct stones. Material and methods. Eighty-three patients above 45 years of age with bile duct stones >1 cm in diameter were randomized to EPLBD and ES groups for removal of common bile duct stones from September 2010 to August 2011. Prophylactic gabexate mesilate was given to all patients. Results. Baseline characteristics were not significantly different, except diabetes and gallbladder stones between the EPLBD group (n = 40) and ES group (n = 43). The overall complete stone removal rate in each group was 97.5% (39/40) and 95.3% (41/43), respectively (p = 0.600). Requirement of mechanical lithotripsy was not significantly different between the EPLBD and ES group (10% vs. 21%, p = 0.171). Complete ductal clearance in one session was achieved in 82.4% and 81.4% of cases in each group, respectively (p = 0.577). There were no differences in complication rates between the EPLBD and ES group; pancreatitis, 5.0% vs. 7.0%; hemorrhage, 10.0% vs. 16.3%; acute cholangitis, 5.0% vs. 2.3%, and perforation, 2.5% vs. 0%. Conclusions. The therapeutic outcomes and complications of EPLBD for removal of large bile duct stones are comparable to those of ES.     

Prospective comparative study of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of large bile duct stones in patients above 45 years of age

Abstract

Objective. Although endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) with limited endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) showed excellent outcomes for treatment of large bile duct stones, hemorrhage and recurrence of stones are problematic complications. Recent studies suggest that EPLBD alone is safe and effective for removal of large bile duct stones. This study aimed to determine the therapeutic outcomes and safety of EPLBD, compared with ES, for removal of large bile duct stones. Material and methods. Eighty-three patients above 45 years of age with bile duct stones >1 cm in diameter were randomized to EPLBD and ES groups for removal of common bile duct stones from September 2010 to August 2011. Prophylactic gabexate mesilate was given to all patients. Results. Baseline characteristics were not significantly different, except diabetes and gallbladder stones between the EPLBD group (n = 40) and ES group (n = 43). The overall complete stone removal rate in each group was 97.5% (39/40) and 95.3% (41/43), respectively (p = 0.600). Requirement of mechanical lithotripsy was not significantly different between the EPLBD and ES group (10% vs. 21%, p = 0.171). Complete ductal clearance in one session was achieved in 82.4% and 81.4% of cases in each group, respectively (p = 0.577). There were no differences in complication rates between the EPLBD and ES group; pancreatitis, 5.0% vs. 7.0%; hemorrhage, 10.0% vs. 16.3%; acute cholangitis, 5.0% vs. 2.3%, and perforation, 2.5% vs. 0%. Conclusions. The therapeutic outcomes and complications of EPLBD for removal of large bile duct stones are comparable to those of ES.     

Outcomes of endoscopic sphincterotomy vs open choledochotomy for common bile duct stones

BACKGROUND Endoscopic sphincterotomy(EST) for the management of common bile duct stones(CBDS) is used increasingly widely because it is a minimally invasive procedure. However, some clinical practitioners argued that EST may be complicated by post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)pancreatitis(PEP) and accompanied by a higher recurrence of CBDS than open choledochotomy(OCT). Whether any differences in outcomes exist between these two approaches for treating CBDS has not been thoroughly elucidated to date.AIM To compare the outcomes of EST vs OCT for the management of CBDS and to clarify the risk factors associated with stone recurrence.METHODS Patients who underwent EST or OCT for CBDS between January 2010 and December 2012 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Follow-up data were obtained through telephone or by searching the medical records. Statistical analysis was carried out for 302 patients who had a follow-up period of at least 5 years or had a recurrence. Propensity score matching(1:1) was performed to adjust for clinical differences. A logistic regression model was used to identify potential risk factors for recurrence, and a receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was generated for qualifying independent risk factors.RESULTS In total, 302 patients undergoing successful EST(n = 168) or OCT(n = 134) were enrolled in the study and were followed for a median of 6.3 years. After propensity score matching, 176 patients remained, and all covariates were balanced. EST was associated with significantly shorter time to relieving biliary obstruction, anesthetic duration, procedure time, and hospital stay than OCT(P <0.001). The number of complete stone clearance sessions increased significantly in the EST group(P = 0.009). The overall incidence of complications and mortality did not differ significantly between the two groups. Recurrent CBDS occurred in18.8%(33/176) of the patients overall, but no difference was found between the EST(20.5%, 18/88) and OCT(17.0%, 15/88) groups. Factors associated with CBDS recurrence included common bile duct(CBD) diameter > 15 mm(OR =2.72; 95%CI: 1.26-5.87; P = 0.011), multiple CBDS(OR = 5.09; 95%CI: 2.58-10.07; P< 0.001), and distal CBD angle ≤ 145°(OR = 2.92; 95%CI: 1.54-5.55; P = 0.001). The prediction model incorporating these factors demonstrated an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.81(95%CI: 0.76-0.87).CONCLUSION EST is superior to OCT with regard to time to biliary obstruction relief, anesthetic duration, procedure time, and hospital stay and is not associated with an increased recurrence rate or mortality compared with OCT in the management of CBDS.     

Endoscopic papillary balloon intermittent dilatation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones

AIM: To compare the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic papillary balloon intermittent dilatation (EPBID) and endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) in the treatment of common bile duct stones. METHODS: From March 2011 to May 2012, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was performed in 560 patients, 262 with common bile duct stones. A total of 206 patients with common bile duct stones were enrolled in the study and randomized to receive either EPBID with a 10-12 mm dilated balloon or EST (103 patients in each group). For both groups a conventional reticular basket or balloon was used to remove the stones. After the procedure, routine endoscopic nasobiliary drainage was performed. RESULTS: First-time stone removal was successfully performed in 94 patients in the EPBID group (91.3%) and 75 patients in the EST group (72.8%). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of operation time between the two groups. The overall incidence of early complications in the EPBID and EST groups was 2.9% and 13.6%, respectively, with no deaths reported during the course of the study and follow-up. Multiple regression analysis showed that the success rate of stone removal was associated with stone removal method [odds ratio (OR): 5.35; 95%CI: 2.24-12.77; P=0.00], the transverse diameter of the stone (OR: 2.63; 95%CI: 1.19-5.80; P=0.02) and the presence or absence of diverticulum (OR: 2.35; 95%CI: 1.03-5.37; P=0.04). Postoperative pancreatitis was associated with the EST method of stone removal (OR: 5.00; 95%CI: 1.23-20.28; P=0.02) and whether or not pancreatography was performed (OR: 0.10; 95%CI: 0.03-0.35; P=0.00). CONCLUSION: The EPBID group had a higher success rate of stone removal with a lower incidence of pancreatitis compared with the EST group.     

内镜下乳头括约肌小切开联合气囊扩张术在胆总管结石治疗中的应用价值

目的探讨内镜下乳头括约肌小切开联合气囊扩张术在胆总管结石治疗中的效果和安全性。方法选取胆总管结石患者46例行乳头括约肌小切开联合气囊扩张术取石,观察治愈率,近期、远期并发症。结果取石成功率为95.7%;近期并发症发生率为6.5%,其中急性胰腺炎1例,胆管炎2例,远期并发症发生率为4.4%,反流性胆管炎、结石复发各1例。结论内镜下乳头括约肌小切开联合气囊扩张术治疗胆总管结石,与乳头括约肌切开取石术同样有效,且安全性更好,操作更简单。     

Recurrence of bile duct stones after endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation combined with limited sphincterotomy: long-term follow-up study

Background/Aims

Endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation combined with limited endoscopic sphincterotomy (EPLBD+ES) is promising for the treatment of common bile duct (CBD) stones. The aim of this study was to clarify the recurrence rate and the risk factors for CBD stones after EPLBD+ES.

Methods

In total, 100 patients who underwent EPLBD+ES from 2006 to 2007 were evaluated retrospectively. One hundred and nine patients who were treated with endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) from 2004 to 2005 were set as the historical control group. Various risk factors for the recurrence of bile duct stones were analyzed.

Results

Of the 209 patients, the duration of follow-up was 32.5±4.5 months in the EPLBD+ES group and 31.8±6.0 months in the ES group. The recurrence rate of CBD stones was 11.0% (11/100) in the EPLBD+ES group and 13.8% (15/109) in the ES group (p=0.546). The cumulative recurrence rate of stones was not significantly different between the EPLBD+ES and ES groups (log rank, p=0.537). Univariate analysis showed that the diameter of the CBD (≥22 mm) was the only predictive variable that could differentiate recurrence from nonrecurrence in the EPLBD+ES group. Multivariate analysis revealed that the diameter of the bile duct was the only risk factor for stone recurrence (p=0.022; odds ratio, 1.175; 95% confidence interval, 1.023 to 1.348).

Conclusions

The recurrence rate of CBD stones after EPLBD+ES is comparable to that of the ES group, and a dilated CBD appears to increase the risk of bile duct stone recurrence.     

十二指肠乳头切开术联合球囊扩张术在肝外胆管结石内镜治疗中的作用

目的 探讨十二指肠乳头切开术(EST)联合十二指肠乳头球囊扩张术(EPBD)在肝外胆管结石内镜治疗中的安全性及其疗效.方法 164例肝外胆管结石患者接受内镜取石治疗,其中78例取石前进行EST联合EPBD治疗(EST+ EPBD组),其余86例取石前进行单一EST治疗(EST组),对比分析2组并发症发生率、结石取净率和碎石发生率.结果 EST+ EPBD组出现高淀粉酶血症3例、轻症急性胰腺炎2例,EST组出现高淀粉酶血症5例、轻症急性胰腺炎3例、出血2例,2组均未出现重症急性胰腺炎、穿孔等严重并发症.EST+ EPBD组并发症发生率为6.4％( 5/78),略低于EST组的11.6％ (10/86)(x2=1.340,P=0.288);结石取净率为100.0％ (78/78),明显高于EST组的93.0％( 80/86)(x2=5.649,P=0.030);碎石发生率为33.3％( 26/78),明显低于EST组的60.5％(52/86)(x2=12.073,P=0.001).结论 EST联合EPBD应用肝外胆管结石内镜治疗中安全、有效,对于结石大、乳头条件差的患者效果尤其明显.