Clinical prediction of normotension in borderline hypertensive men--a 10 year study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate 24-h ambulatory blood pressure measurements (ABPM) as a tool for long-term prediction of future blood pressure (BP) status in high normal and low stage 1 hypertensives. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 165 men from a population screening program with diastolic BP (DBP) 85-94 mmHg and a systolic BP (SBP) < 150 mmHg performed a 24-h ABPM. Ten years later, 120 participants (73%) returned for renewed measurements. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blood pressure status at 10 years. RESULTS: At the 10-year follow-up, 53% of the participants were classified as hypertensive (HT) (BP > or = 140/90 or taking anti-hypertensive medication) and 47% were classified as normotensive (NT) (BP < 140/90 mmHg). There was no significant baseline differences in office SBP levels between those who were normotensive or hypertensive at follow-up (136/91 versus 138/92 mmHg), whereas both SBP and DBP night-time levels were significantly lower in the future normotensives as compared to the future hypertensives (107/69 versus 112/74 mmHg, P < 0.01). Using recommended normalcy night-time ABP levels of < 120/75 mmHg in addition to office BP (140/90) at baseline, over 85% of the subjects were correctly classified provided they met both clinic and ambulatory night-time criteria for HT and NT classification at baseline. CONCLUSION: The use of ABPM in addition to office BP's in patients with borderline hypertension greatly increases the possibility of identifying those individuals who are at a very small risk of developing future hypertension. This could potentially lead to considerable savings in both patient anxiety, physician time and resource consumption.     

Isolated systolic hypertension: data on a cohort of young subjects from a French working population (IHPAF)

Elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH)--systolic blood pressure (SBP) > or =140 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) <90 mmHg--have increased mortality and morbidity. The aim was to study the incidence of ISH in a younger population of between 15 and 60 years of age, and to measure pulse pressure (PP), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) in these subjects. The study population consisted of 27 783 subjects, aged 15-60 years, untreated for hypertension (HT) from a cohort of employees formed to study the incidence of HT in the French working population (AIHFP). BP and HR were measured with a validated, automatic device after 5, 6 and 7 min at rest. The prevalence of ISH was 6.9% in men, 2.3% in women. This prevalence was over 5% in young men and increased at 40-44 years; it was negligible in young women, but increased at 50-54 years to about 10% (ie to the same level as in men of the same age): PP in subjects with ISH (46.9 mmHg) was significantly higher than in the normotensive group (NT-40.9 mmHg); it was comparable in both young men (65.5 mmHg) and older men (66 mmHg); it was higher in men (63.1 mmHg) than in women (61.5 mmHg). HR was higher in ISH than in NT and it was higher in women ( approximately 5 bpm) in whom it decreased with age. The prevalence of ISH is not negligible in HT (30% men, 25% women), with a high prevalence in young subjects and elevated PP, MAP and HR values. These data should be taken into account as elevated ISH, PP and HR are considered as cardio-vascular risk factors.     

Is the white coat effect an alert reaction?

Is the white coat effect an alert reaction? In this cross-sectional study we compared the white coat effect on systolic blood pressure with the systolic blood pressure reactivity obtained during a stress test. The influence of the sympathetic system (LF band of systolic BP) and the parasympathetic system (HF band of pulse rate) on white coat systolic blood pressure and stress test systolic blood pressure were analysed. We stratified 174 subjects into two groups, according to their blood pressure: hypertensives (HT, n=44, BP>140/90 mmHg) and normotensives (NT, n=130). The BP was recorded during an occupational health consultation, over 24 hours, and beat to beat during a stress test (Finapress). White coat systolic BP was calculated as the difference between the consultation BP and the average systolic BP over 24 hours. The white coat systolic BP was not related with an increase in pulse rate. In contrast, during the stress test the increases in systolic BP and pulse rate were correlated (r=0.44; p<0.001). The white coat systolic BP was lower than the stress test systolic BP in the NT (6.6 +/- 7.2 vs 23 +/- 12 mmHg; p<0.001) and in the HT (16 +/- 11 vs 29 +/- 17 mmHg; p<0.001). The HT had a lower parasympathetic index than the NT (0.45 +/- 0.43 vs 0.92 +/- 0.83 bpm2; p<0.001). In the HT the white coat systolic BP was positively correlated with the stress test systolic BP (r=0.47: p<0.01) and negatively with the parasympathetic activity index. In conclusion, for recently diagnosed and untreated HT an early alteration of the parasympathetic system reveals that the white coat effect is a low amplitude alert reaction.     

Urinary angiotensinogen level is correlated with blood pressure level and proteinuria in patients with masked hypertension

Urinary <AQ: Please check whether all the edits made in this paper convey your intended meaning, and correct if necessary.>angiotensinogen (UAGT) level is an index of the intrarenal-renin angiotensin system status and is significantly correlated with blood pressure (BP) and proteinuria in patients with hypertension (HT). We aimed to investigate the possible relationship between UAGT levels and albuminuria in masked hypertensives. A total of 96 nondiabetic treated hypertensive patients were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups: masked hypertensives (office BP <140/90 mmHg and ambulatory BP ≥130/80 mmHg) and controlled hypertensives (office BP <140/90 mmHg and ambulatory BP <130/80). The mean UAGT/UCre level and urinary albumin–creatinine ratio (UACR) of masked hypertensives were higher than those of controlled hypertensives (7.76 μg/g vs 4.02 μg/g, p < 0.001 and 174.21 mg/g vs 77.74 mg/g, p < 0.001, respectively). A significant positive correlation was found between UAGT/UCre levels and ambulatory systolic BP and diastolic BP levels in patients with masked HT, but this was not found with office SBP or DBP levels. Importantly, UAGT/UCre levels showed a significant positive correlation with UACR in both groups, but correlation of the UAGT levels with UACR was more pronounced in masked hypertensives (r = 0.854, p < 0.001 vsr = 0.512, p < 0.01). As a result, UAGT level was increased in patients with masked HT, which was associated with an elevation in albuminuria. Overproduction of the UAGT may play a pivotal role in development of proteinuria.     

Pravastatin decreases blood pressure in hypertensive and hypercholesterolemic patients receiving antihypertensive treatment.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that the lipid-lowering agents, statins, may help reduce blood pressure (BP). The goal of the present study was to characterize the effect of pravastatin on BP in hypercholesterolemic and hypertensive patients already receiving antihypertensive drugs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty-two patients with hypercholesterolemia were retrospectively studied before and after 3 months of treatment with pravastatin. Forty-four patients had hypertension (HT group) and were receiving antihypertensive treatment, while the remaining 38 patients were normotensive (NT group). Patients in the HT group were further subdivided into those with uncontrolled or controlled BP. Pravastatin treatment significantly reduced systolic BP (SBP) in the HT group (134+/-16 to 130+/-13 mmHg, p<0.005) but not in the NT group (124+/-10 to 123+/-9 mmHg, p=0.52), despite the fact that treatment significantly reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in both groups (HT group 178+/-27 to 132+/-17 mg/dl, p<0.0001; NT group 169+/-27 to 125+/-21 mg/dl, p<0.0001). Further, pravastatin significantly decreased SBP in the uncontrolled BP group (148+/-7 to 138+/-12 mmHg, p<0.005) but not in the controlled BP group (122+/-10 to 123+/-9 mmHg, p=0.72). CONCLUSION: Concomitant use of statins and antihypertensive drugs could result in improved BP control in hypertensive patients with hypercholesterolemia.     

The study of aortic stiffness in different hypertension subtypes in dialysis patients.

The aim of this study was to validate whether differences in aortic stiffness are responsible for the differences in cardiovascular mortality among hypertension subtypes. Twenty hundred and fifty continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients were included in the present study. They were classified into four groups: normotensives (n=92) with systolic blood pressure (SBP) <140 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) <90 mmHg; isolated systolic hypertensives (ISH, n=84) with SBP > or =140 mmHg and DBP <90 mmHg; isolated diastolic hypertensives (IDH, n=21) with SBP <140 mmHg and DBP > or =90 mmHg; and systolic-diastolic hypertensives (SDH, n=53) with SBP > or =140 mmHg and DBP > or =90 mmHg. Aortic stiffness was assessed by pulse pressure, central pressure parameters and pulse wave velocity. The IDH group had more male patients and a lower mean age than the other groups. The percentage of diabetes in the ISH group was higher than that in the other groups. The comparisons of aortic stiffness showed that the ISH and SDH groups had higher aortic stiffness than the normotension and IDH groups. The aortic stiffness in the ISH group was also higher than that in the SDH group, but there was no significant difference in aortic stiffness between the normotension and IDH groups. In conclusion, this study showed that aortic stiffness was significantly different among different hypertension subtypes, which might be an underlying cause of the differences in cardiovascular mortality among the hypertension subtypes.     

Blood pressure measurements by the Keito machine. Evaluation versus office blood pressure by physicians

BACKGROUND: The Keito machine offers automatic measurements of blood pressure (BP), height and weight on insertion of coins and has been introduced in pharmacies. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study comparing automatic BP measurements by the Keito machine to office BP measurements by physicians. METHODS: Patients scheduled for pre-catheterisation screening participated in the study. Their BP was first measured using the Keito machine, then by physicians. Office BP was recorded as the last of three consecutive BP measurements recorded with one-min intervals after a five-min rest in the sitting position. In a sub-study BP was measured simultaneously during the Keito measurement by a physician. RESULTS: In 390 consecutive patients average BP was significantly lower with the Keito machine compared to office BP measurements made by the physicians (136/75+/-19/8 mmHg versus 141/79+/-21/10 mmHg, both p<0.001). The correlation coefficient (r) was 0.56 (p<0.001) for systolic BP (SBP) and 0.53 (p<0.001) for diastolic BP (DBP). Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference (+/-2 SD) for SBP and DBP of -5 (+/-37) and -4 (+/-17) mmHg, respectively. When defining hypertension (HT) as office SBP> or =140 and/or DBP> or =90 mmHg, the Keito method diagnosed 83% of the systolic and 62% of the diastolic hypertensive population correctly. The classification of systolic and diastolic normotensive was correct in 61% and 86%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Agreement between office and Keito BP is poor. The Keito machine underestimates SBP on average by 5 mmHg and DBP by 4 mmHg, which may be of significance for diagnosing HT and starting anti-hypertensive therapy. However, the difference can be much larger in individual patients. Therefore, the Keito machine cannot be recommended for medical screening of HT or as a replacement for follow-up by physicians.     

Is masked hypertension an artefact due to the blood pressure measurement method and threshold effects?

From results of office and home measurements of blood pressure (BP), patients can be classified as "hypertensive (HT)", "normotensive (NT)", "office hypertensive (OH)" or "masked hypertensive (MH)" by crossing the classifications obtained from each method. It seems that 9 to 20% of patients could be MH with a prognosis close to HT (SHEAF study). OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that at least one part of the prevalence of MH would be an artefact due to the difference between the methods of measurements (shygmomanometer vs semi-automatic device) and/or due to different definitions of office hypertension (OHT). To determine the impact of different definitions of OHT on the prevalence of MH. METHODS: During the course of a phase IV study, BP was measured with the same semi-automatic device (OMRON 705CP) both at doctor's office (3 measurements at 1-minute intervals) and at home, by the patient himself (3 measurements in the morning and in the evening at 1-minute intervals over the 7 days before the visit). Following definitions were used: Office HT: SBP > or =140 mmHg, DBP > or =90 mmHg, SBP > or =140 mmHg or DBP > or =90 mmHg; Home HT: SBP > or =135 mmHg, DBP> or =85 mmHg, SBP > or =135 mmHg or DBP > or =85 mmHg. Another definition of office HT was used SBP > or =135 mmHg, DBP > or =85 mmHg SBP > or =135 mmHg or DBP > or =85 mmHg. RESULTS: 575 patients were analysed. Results from the two methods of measurements are closed but significantly different (difference for SBP: 3.2 +/- 16.5 mmHg; p < 0.0001; difference for DBP: 1.4 +/- 10.3 mmHg; p = 0.002)     

Enhanced blood pressure response to isometric handgrip exercise in patients with essential hypertension: effects of propranolol and prazosin

To elucidate whether a difference exists in blood pressure (BP) elevation during isometric handgrip exercise (IHG) between essential hypertensives (EHT) and normotensives (NT), IHG was carried out in 12 NT and 46 EHT under constant sodium intake using a new instrument. The acute effects of propranolol and prazosin on IHG were also examined in EHT. The change in systolic BP (delta SBP) during IHG in EHT, delta SBP = 61 +/- 21 mmHg, was markedly greater than that in NT, delta SBP = 28 +/- 4 mmHg. Among EHT, delta BP increased with increasing severity of hypertension. Neither the changes in plasma norepinephrine nor in epinephrine during IHG showed significant differences between EHT and NT. The pressor response during IHG could not be suppressed by propranolol, but about 30% suppression of BP was observed during IHG with prazosin. It is concluded from these findings that EHT have an exaggerated BP response to IHG that is due to increased post-junctional alpha 1-adrenoceptors.     

Ambulatory blood pressure in the young adult with hypertension history during childhood]

The tendency of subjects to maintain their relative position within the distribution of blood pressure (BP) has been defined as "tracking". Regarding this phenomenon, the purpose of the study was to evaluate the interest of ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) in the assessment of arterial hypertension in young adults (YA) with childhood hypertension history (CHH). 52 subjects, 20.1 +/- 2.4 years old, 26 men, 26 women issued from a cohort of 150 children with high BP levels (greater than 97.5 th percentile) during their infancy (school check-up), were included in the study. An ABPM was performed with space-labs system 90202 from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m., measurements every 15 minutes (37.6 +/- 7.4 readings). Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) was determined with echocardiography, (Penn convention). Office BP, measured with mercury apparatus in lying and standing position, was respectively, 131.0 +/- 14.6/81.9 +/- 9.7 and 130.1 +/- 14/86.6 +/- 9.9. According to JNC 1988, this casual BP identified 40 normotensives (NT), 9 borderlines (BL) and 5 hypertensives (HT); 10 of them had a "high normal" diastolic BP (85-90 mmHg) ABP recordings of the study group were compared to day-time reference values of NT. Three subgroups are individualized: G1 NT, G2 HT, G3 BL. [table; see text] *p: less than 0.001; p: less than 0.01. Wall thickness (WTh) and LVMI were significantly higher in hypertensives (G2 + G3) than in normotensives (G1): [table; see text] There was a significant correlation between LVMI and mean systolic ABP (p less than 0.01: r = 0.44), but not with office SBP.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Variability Is Increased in Diabetic Hypertensives

The purpose of this study was to examine the possible difference in the 24-hr BP profile—including short-term BP variability, assessed as the standard deviation—between diabetic and non-diabetic hypertensives. We measured 24-hr ambulatory BP in 11 diabetic hypertensives (diabetic HT) and 10 non-diabetic hypertensives (non-diabetic HT) who were hospitalized for the educational program in our hospital and were under stable salt intake. Renal function and sleep apnea were also estimated. There were no significant differences in 24-hr systolic BP (141 mmHg vs. 135 mmHg, ns), daytime systolic BP (143 mmHg vs. 138 mmHg, ns), and nighttime systolic BP (135 mmHg vs. 130 mmHg, ns) between diabetic HT and non-diabetic HT. The values of 24‐hr HR (69.7 beats/min vs. 65.2 beats/min, ns) and 24-hr HR variability (9.9 beats/min vs. 10.1 beats/min, ns) were also similar between the groups. Interestingly, diabetic HT had a significantly greater 24-hr systolic and diastolic BP variability than non-diabetic HT (18.2 mmHg vs. 14.5 mmHg, p < 0.05; 11.5 mmHg vs. 9.6 mmHg, p < 0.05, respectively). The values for creatinine clearance, urinary protein excretion, and apnea-hypopnea index were similar between the groups. Bivariate linear regression analysis demonstrated that fasting blood glucose was the primary determinant of 24-hr diastolic BP variability (r = 0.661, p < 0.01). Multiple stepwise regression analysis revealed that fasting blood glucose was a significant and independent contributor to 24-hr systolic BP variability (r = 0.501, p < 0.05). Taken together, these results demonstrate that BP variability is increased in diabetic hypertensives. Furthermore, it is possible that an elevation of fasting blood glucose may contribute to the enhanced BP variability in hypertensives.     

Development of hypertension over 6 years in a birth cohort of young middle-aged men: the Cardiovascular Risk Factor Study in southern Sweden (CRISS)

OBJECTIVES: To explore the development of hypertension (HT) in a cohort of young middle-aged men. DESIGN: Prospective birth-cohort study of men surveyed over 6 years. SETTING: Helsingborg County Hospital, Sweden, 1990-97. SUBJECTS: A total of 628 men born in 1953-54, all surveyed at 37, 40 and 43 years of age. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), S-cholesterol, body mass index (BMI), alcohol consumption, ethnicity. HT was defined as SBP > or = 140 mmHg and/or DBP > or = 90 mmHg, or ongoing treatment. Using SBP < 130 mmHg and DBP < 85 mmHg as reference, the odds of conversion to HT in men with high normal blood pressure (BP) (SBP 130-139 mmHg and DBP 85-89 mmHg) was investigated. RESULTS: At age 37, 243 men (39%) had reference BP, 167 (26%) had high normal BP and 218 (35%) were hypertensive. Corresponding numbers at age 40 were 265 (42%), 166 (27%) and 197 (31%); and at age 43, 180 (29%), 142 (22%) and 306 (49%), respectively. High normal BP at baseline was associated with the development of HT both at age 40 (odds ratio (OR)=2.45 confidence interval (CI): 1.42-4.22) and at age 43 (OR=2.46, CI: 1.59-3.80), independent of other cardiovascular disease risk factors and ethnicity. The progression to HT was predicted also by S-cholesterol, alcohol consumption, BMI and weight gain. CONCLUSIONS: Over a short-term period, a substantial proportion of young middle-aged men with high normal BP develop HT with overweight and alcohol consumption as important determinants. These findings have implications for the prevention, screening and medical care of HT in this target population.     

Predictive factors for masked hypertension within a population of controlled hypertensives

CONTEXT: Prevalence of masked hypertension (MH) is far from negligible reaching 40% in some studies. The SHEAF study (Self measurement of blood pressure at Home in the Elderly: Assessment and Follow-Up) and others clearly showed that masked hypertension (MH) as detected by home blood pressure measurement (HBPM) is associated with poor cardiovascular prognosis. OBJECTIVE: Systematic HBPM to detect MH is not yet routine. The aim of this work is to better define the clinical profile of masked hypertensives within a population with controlled office blood pressure (BP) and the factors associated with a higher prevalence of MH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: BP was measured at the clinic by the doctor and at home by the patient himself. Risk factors for MH were analysed in a cohort of 1150 treated hypertensive patients over the age of 60 (mean age 70 +/- 6.5, 48.9% men) with controlled office BP. (SBP < 140 mmHg and DBP < 90 mmHg). RESULTS: 463 patients (40%) were masked hypertensives (SBP > or = 135 mmHg or DBP > or = 85 mmHg at home). Three parameters were associated with MH (odds ratio OR): office SBP (OR = 1.110), male gender (OR = 2.214) and age (OR = 1.031). Decision trees showed a 130 mmHg SBP was an efficient threshold to propose HBPM with a higher probability to detect MH. Subsequent variables were male gender and age over 70 in males. CONCLUSION: To detect masked hypertension, it would be logical to first of all select patients whose office SBP is between 130 and 140 mmHg.     

Morning rise of blood pressure assessed by home blood pressure monitoring is associated with left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients receiving long-term antihypertensive medication.

To assess the influence of morning rise of systolic blood pressure (SBP) as assessed by home blood pressure monitoring on the left ventricular mass index (LVMI) in relation to the blood pressure control status, we evaluated M-mode cardiac echocardiography in 626 hypertensive subjects (412 men and 214 women; mean age, 61.3+/-10.1 years) who were receiving antihypertensive medication. The subjects were requested to measure their blood pressure at home in the morning and evening over a 3-month period. They were distributed into the following four groups by the average (ME Ave) and the difference (ME Dif) of the morning and evening SBP. The well-controlled hypertensives with a morning rise of SBP (ME Ave<135 mmHg and ME Dif>or=10 mmHg; n=45; 7.2%) had a greater LVMI (122.9+/-22.7 vs. 92.7+/-15.6 g/m2, p<0.001) than the well-controlled hypertensives without a morning rise of SBP (ME Ave<135 mmHg and ME Dif<10 mmHg; n=367; 58.6%). The uncontrolled hypertensives with a morning rise of SBP (ME Ave>or=135 mmHg and ME Dif>or=10 mmHg; n=91; 14.5%) also had a greater LVMI (136.8+/-21.9 vs. 100.2+/-17.5 g/m2, p<0.001) than the uncontrolled hypertensives without a morning rise of SBP (ME Ave>or=135 mmHg and ME Dif<10 mmHg; n=123; 19.6%). A stepwise multivariate regression analysis revealed that the ME Dif was the most important factor related to the LVMI (r2=35.1% for all subjects, p<0001; r2=39.7% for men, p<0.001; and r2=18.7% for women, p<0.001). These results suggest that morning rise of blood pressure is an important factor influencing the development of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients on antihypertensive medication.     

Usefulness of the alpha1-blocker doxazosin as a third-line antihypertensive drug.

It has been reported that a substantial majority of hypertensives receive insufficient blood pressure (BP) control. As combination therapy for the treatment of hypertension, Ca channel blockers (CCBs), angiotensin II (AII) receptor blockers (ARBs), and/or AII-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are mainly prescribed, while the efficacy of alpha(1)-blockers in such combination therapy remains unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a low dose of an alpha(1)-blocker added to combination therapy with CCBs and either ARBs or ACE inhibitors for the treatment of hypertension. Subjects were 41 hypertensive patients (23 women and 18 men, mean age 66+/-12 years) who had been followed at the National Kyushu Medical Center. All patients showed poor BP control despite haven taken a combination of CCBs and ARBs or ACE inhibitors for more than 3 months. Doxazosin at a dose of 1 to 2 mg was added to each treatment regimen. The changes in various clinical parameters, including BP and blood chemistry, following the addition of doxazosin were then evaluated. The mean follow-up period was 170 days. BP decreased from 152+/-14/81+/-12 mmHg to 135+/-14/70+/-11 mmHg after the addition of doxazosin at a mean dose of 1.5 mg/day (p<0.001). When good systolic blood pressure (SBP) control was defined as <140 mmHg, the prevalence of patients with good SBP control increased from 24% to 61% (p<0.01). Similarly, the prevalence of patients with good diastolic blood pressure (DBP) control (<90 mmHg) increased from 78% to 98% (p<0.01). Patients whose SBP decreased more than 10 mmHg (n=25) showed significantly higher baseline SBP, serum total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels compared to those who showed less SBP reduction (<10 mmHg) (n=16, p<0.01). Comparable BP reductions were obtained between obese (body mass index [BMI] > or =25, DeltaBP at 3 months: -15+/-15/-12+/-9 mmHg, n=18) and non-obese (BMI<25, DeltaBP: -14+/-19/-7+/-8 mmHg, n=23) patients. The results suggest that addition of a low dose of the alpha(1)-blocker doxazosin effectively reduces BP in patients taking CCBs and ARBs or ACE inhibitors. Thus, doxazosin seems to be useful as a third-line antihypertensive drug.     

Ambulatory blood pressure variability is increased in diabetic hypertensives

The purpose of this study was to examine the possible difference in the 24-hr BP profile--including short-term BP variability, assessed as the standard deviation--between diabetic and non-diabetic hypertensives. We measured 24-hr ambulatory BP in 11 diabetic hypertensives (diabetic HT) and 10 non-diabetic hypertensives (non-diabetic HT) who were hospitalized for the educational program in our hospital and were under stable salt intake. Renal function and sleep apnea were also estimated. There were no significant differences in 24-hr systolic BP (141 mmHg vs. 135 mmHg, ns), daytime systolic BP (143 mmHg vs. 138 mmHg, ns), and nighttime systolic BP (135 mmHg vs. 130 mmHg, ns) between diabetic HT and non-diabetic HT. The values of 24-hr HR (69.7 beats/min vs. 65.2 beats/min, ns) and 24-hr HR variability (9.9 beats/min vs. 10.1 beats/min, ns) were also similar between the groups. Interestingly, diabetic HT had a significantly greater 24-hr systolic and diastolic BP variability than non-diabetic HT (18.2 mmHg vs. 14.5 mmHg, p < 0.05; 11.5 mmHg vs. 9.6 mmHg, p < 0.05, respectively). The values for creatinine clearance, urinary protein excretion, and apnea-hypopnea index were similar between the groups. Bivariate linear regression analysis demonstrated that fasting blood glucose was the primary determinant of 24-hr diastolic BP variability (r = 0.661, p < 0.01). Multiple stepwise regression analysis revealed that fasting blood glucose was a significant and independent contributor to 24-hr systolic BP variability (r = 0.501, p < 0.05). Taken together, these results demonstrate that BP variability is increased in diabetic hypertensives. Furthermore, it is possible that an elevation of fasting blood glucose may contribute to the enhanced BP variability in hypertensives.     

Subjects with essential hypertension are more sensitive to the inhibition of 11 beta-HSD by liquorice

In this intervention study, we have investigated if hypertensive patients are more sensitive to liquorice-induced inhibition of 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (11 beta-HSD) type 2 than normotensive (NT) subjects and if the response depends on gender. Healthy volunteers and patients with essential hypertension (HT), consumed 100 g of liquorice daily, for 4 weeks, corresponding to a daily intake of 150 mg glycyrrhetinic acid. Office, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (BP) and blood samples were measured before, during and after liquorice consumption. Effect on cortisol metabolism was evaluated by determining the urinary total cortisol metabolites and urinary free cortisol/free cortisone quotient (Q). The mean rise in systolic BP with office measurements after 4 weeks of liquorice consumption was 3.5 mmHg (p<0.06) in NT and 15.3 mmHg (p=0.003) in hypertensive subjects, the response being different (p=0.004). The mean rise in diastolic BP was 3.6 mmHg (p=0.01) in NT and 9.3 mmHg (p<0.001) in hypertensive subjects, the response also being different (p=0.03). Liquorice induced more pronounced clinical symptoms in women than in men (p=0.0008), although the difference in the effect on the BP was not significant. The increase in Q was prominent (p<0.0001) and correlated to the rise in BP (p=0.02). The rise in BP was not dependant on age, the change in plasma renin activity or weight. We conclude that patients with essential HT are more sensitive to the inhibition of 11 beta-HSD by liquorice than NT subjects, and that this inhibition causes more clinical symptoms in women than in men.     

广州茶涪街社区高血压病的发病率、知晓率及治疗依从性研究

目的 了解广州市荔湾区茶涪街社区高血压病的发病率、知晓情况及依从性,为进一步做好高血压病的预防提供资料。方法随机抽取该社区住户中年龄≥20岁的居民2420名（社区总人口的8．77％）,给予问卷调查并测量血压。判定高血压的标准为：收缩压≥140mmHg和（或）舒张压≥90mmHg。判定单纯收缩期高血压的标准为收缩压≥140mmHg且舒张压〈90mmng。结果该社区20岁以上人员高血压病的发病率为16．12％,其中58．72％的高血压患者没有认识到自己患有高血压。在既往确诊病例中,70．19％的患者对降压治疗无良好的依从性。单纯收缩期高血压的发病率为4．71％。年龄≥60岁的高血压病患者中有43．56％为单纯收缩期高血压。结论广州市荔湾区茶涪街社区高血压病高发。有超过一半的高血压患者对自己患有高血压病不知晓。在老年高血压患者中,单纯收缩期高血压患者不少。大部分患者依从性差,仅少部分患者可将血压控制在理想水平。在社区内定期对居民血压进行普查并进行宣教是必要的。     

Greater change of orthostatic blood pressure is related to silent cerebral infarct and cardiac overload in hypertensive subjects.

Greater change of postural blood pressure (BP) is often seen in elderly hypertensives and is recognized as a risk factor for cognitive decline and poorer cerebrovascular outcome, but its clinical significance still remains to be clarified. We performed a head-up tilting test, ambulatory BP monitoring, and brain MRI in 59 hypertensives and 27 normotensive subjects. We measured plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels at rest to assess cardiac burden. The 59 hypertensive patients were classified into 3 groups: an orthostatic hypertension (OHT) group with orthostatic increase in systolic BP (SBP) > or = 10 mmHg (n=16); an orthostatic hypotension (OHYPO) group with orthostatic SBP decrease < or = -10 mmHg (n=18); and an orthostatic normotension (ONT) group with neither of these two patterns (n=25). A group of 27 normotensive subjects (NT) was also included as a control. Plasma BNP (72 +/- 92 vs. 29 +/- 24 pg/ml, p < 0.05) and BNP/ANP ratio (4.6 +/- 3.3 vs. 2.4 +/- 1.5, p < 0.05) were significantly higher in the OHYPO than in the NT group. The BNP/ANP ratio was also higher in the OHT than in the NT group (5.1 +/- 3.9 vs. 2.4 +/- 1.5, p < 0.01). The number of silent cerebral infarct (SCI), prevalence of SCI and number of multiple SCIs was the highest in the OHT group, followed in order by the OHYPO, ONT and NT groups. Blood pressure and left ventricular mass index were not significantly different among the 3 hypertensive groups. In conclusion, hypertensive patients with greater change of postural BP (OHT and OHYPO) were shown to have increased risk of advanced silent brain lesions and greater cardiac burden.     

Arterial stiffness is increased in hypertensive centenarians

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to assess the relationship between blood pressure and arterial stiffness in Polish centenarians. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 59 centenarians with the mean age of 101.3 years. Peripheral blood pressure was estimated upon mean value of three measurements and arterial stiffness by pulse wave analysis (PWA). Pressure waveforms were recorded from the radial artery and the waveform data were then processed by SphygmoCor to produce the estimated aortic pressure waveform. All subjects were divided into the three subgroups: normotensives (< 140/ 90 mmHg), systolic hypertensives (ISH, SBP > or = 140 and DBP < 90 mmHg) and systolo-diastolic hypertensives (> or = 140/90 or treated). RESULTS: The mean values of peripheral BP for the entire group were: 149.5/76.8 mmHg for SBPP/DBPP and 136.1/ 77.8 mmHg for central SBPC/DBPC, respectively. The mean value of pulse pressures were: 72.7/58.4 mmHg for peripheral (PPP)/central (PPc). Arterial stiffness indices calculated from PWA were: 96.6%, 33.2% and 32.2% for peripheral (AIxP), central (AIxC) and central normalized for heart rate (AIxC75) augmentation indexes, respectively. The PPc was the lowest in the normotensive group (40.1 mmHg) when compared both with the ISH group (71.1 mmHg) and the systolo-diastolic group (58.1 mmHg). The lowest arterial stiffness indices (AIxp, AIxC75) calculated from PWA were found in the normotensive group: 85.4% and 28.5%, comparing with 96.1% and 33.7% in the ISH group and 104.8% and 32.9% for the systolo-diastolic group. CONCLUSIONS: In centenarians, similarly to younger subjects, those with hypertension present with arterial stiffness.