Competency in electrocardiogram interpretation among internal medicine and emergency medicine residents

PURPOSE: Accurate interpretation of the electrocardiogram is critical, yet there are no evidence-based guidelines for assessing competency. Our study evaluated the ability of internal medicine residents and emergency medicine residents to interpret a variety of electrocardiograms. METHODS: The 120 participants included 87 internal medicine residents and 33 emergency medicine residents at two hospitals. Participants reported their sex, training level, adequacy of training, career interest in cardiology, and estimated electrocardiogram proficiency. They then took a test containing 12 electrocardiograms and recorded their diagnosis and certainty. Two cardiologists independently established the correct diagnoses. Two blinded, independent graders scored each electrocardiogram (0 = incorrect, 1 = partially correct, 2 = correct). RESULTS: The median proficiency was 6 out of 10, total electrocardiogram score was 15 of 24, and certainty was 33 of 48. There was no significant difference in overall competency between emergency medicine and internal medicine residents (14.0 vs 15.0, P = 0.239). Internal medicine residents interested in a cardiology career scored higher than those not interested in a cardiology career (17.3 vs. 14.1, P = 0.003). When analyzing the most critical diagnoses, we found that the mean score for ventricular tachycardia was 1.6 of 2.0, for myocardial infarction was 1.3 of 2.0, and for complete heart block was 0.8 of 2.0. Over half of the participants felt their electrocardiogram training was inadequate. CONCLUSION: Despite improvement in interpretation with clinical experience, overall performance was low. Research is needed to find optimal methods to improve electrocardiogram competency.     

Factors associated with career longevity in residency-trained emergency physicians.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that residency-trained emergency physicians who left the practice of emergency medicine do not differ significantly from those who continue to practice. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study using a mailed questionnaire. TYPE OF PARTICIPANTS: Eight hundred fifty-eight emergency medicine residency graduates from 1978 through 1982. METHODS: A mailed questionnaire was used to obtain data from the study population. Individuals who did not respond to the first mailing were sent a second survey six weeks later. A sample of 10% of nonrespondents was contacted by telephone and compared with respondents on five variables. Respondents were divided into physicians who continued to practice emergency medicine and those who had elected to leave the specialty. The variables used to compare the two groups included personal and professional demographics, career satisfaction, and satisfaction with training. chi 2, Fisher's exact t-test, and logistic regression were used to analyze the data with an a priori level of significance set at .05. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were 539 complete responses for a response rate of 62.8%. No statistical differences between responders and nonresponders were identified. The ten-year survival rate of respondents was 84.9%. Those who left emergency medicine were less likely to be board certified in emergency medicine (P less than .001), were more likely to be board certified in another field (P = .001), were less likely to work with residents during their emergency medicine practice (P = .009), and were more likely to report an annual gross income of less than $100,000 per year (P less than .001). Emergency physicians who have left the field were less likely to report being satisfied or very satisfied with their initial choice of emergency medicine as a specialty (P = .001). There was no difference in satisfaction with the quality of emergency medicine residency training (P = .183). CONCLUSION: Career longevity of residency-trained emergency physicians has been greater than early predictions. Interactions with residents, higher income, satisfaction with training decision, and board certification in emergency medicine are variables associated with a higher retention rate.     

Do physicians examine patients in contact isolation less frequently? A brief report

BACKGROUND: Patients who are hospitalized and infected with multidrug-resistant bacteria are usually placed in contact isolation, which requires hospital personnel to gown and glove before patient examination. Contact isolation with active culture surveillance appears beneficial in preventing the spread of drug-resistant infections; however, contact isolation may impede the ability to examine patients as a result of the additional effort required to gown and glove. We assessed whether patients who are hospitalized and placed under contact precautions are examined less often by second- and third-year medical residents (ie, senior medical residents), and attending physicians during morning rounds. METHOD: We conducted a prospective cohort study on the inpatient medical services at 2 university-affiliated medical centers. We directly observed senior medical residents and attending physicians during morning rounds, and recorded the contact precaution status of the patient and whether they were examined by either physician. RESULTS: Of a total of 139 patients, 31 (22%) were in contact isolation. Senior medical residents examined 26 of 31 patients (84%) in contact isolation versus 94 of 108 patients (87%) not in contact isolation (relative risk, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-1.14; P =.58). In comparison, attending physicians examined 11 of 31 patients (35%) in contact isolation versus 79 of 108 patients (73%) not in contact isolation (relative risk, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.79; P <.001). DISCUSSION: Attending physicians are about half as likely to examine patients in contact isolation compared with patients not in contact isolation.     

Clinical Gestalt and the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: Does Experience Matter?

STUDY OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether the accuracy of pretest assessment of the likelihood of pulmonary embolism (PE) was related to physician experience. We compared the accuracy of the subjective pretest probability assessment made by senior physicians (postgraduate year [PGY]-4+) to that of interns (PGY-1) and residents (PGY-2 and PGY-3) working in the emergency department of a large teaching hospital. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Urban, academic emergency department with an annual census of 48,000 patient visits. PATIENTS: Five hundred eighty-three adults evaluated for PE in the emergency department. INTERVENTIONS: Eligible patients had at least one diagnostic test ordered to workup PE. The physician treating the patient was asked whether he or she considered PE the most-likely diagnosis or whether an alternative diagnosis was most likely. This result was compared to the ultimate diagnosis. Physician experience was categorized by the number of years of training since medical school graduation. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: There was a trend toward increasing accuracy with increasing experience, demonstrated by the frequency of true-positive assessments (17% vs 20% vs 25%), true-negative assessments (89% vs 94% vs 96%), and likelihood ratio (1.49 vs 2.34 vs 3.33), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate determination of the pretest probability of PE appears to increase with clinical experience. However, the difference in accuracy between inexperienced and experienced physicians is not sufficiently large to distinguish between the two when determining whether clinical gestalt or a clinical prediction rule should be used to determine the pretest probability of PE.     

Problematic resident-patient relationships

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the study were to identify the characteristics of a problematic doctor-patient relationship from the perspective of primary care patients who are cared for by medical residents and to determine whether patients' perception of the relationship is a function of their demographic, clinical, or social attributes. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: An adult primary care practice in an academic medical center. PATIENTS: One hundred fifty-one patients whose primary care physicians were senior internal medicine residents. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients completed a questionnaire addressing several aspects of their doctor-patient relationship, the general health perception item on the SF-12, and items on social support from the Duke Social Support and Stress Scale. By design of the study, approximately half of the patients had been identified by their physicians as being in problematic relationships (n = 74) and half as being in satisfying relationships (n = 77). Among patients in relationships described as satisfying by their resident, 10% viewed the relationship as problematic. Of the patients involved in relationships described as problematic by the resident, 23% viewed their relationship as problematic (P = .03). Patients who rated the relationship as problematic were much more likely to also report low social support compared to patients involved in relationships described as satisfying (76% vs 16%; P < .001). Compared to residents involved in relationships described as satisfying by their patients, residents in problematic relationships were more likely to be described as being less accessible and less capable of handling medical complaints (P < . 001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients were more likely to describe the doctor-patient relationship as problematic if they felt that the resident was less accessible or less capable of handling medical complaints, or if they had low self-perceived social support.     

Liver stiffness measurement versus clinicians' prediction or both for the assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to estimate the additional value of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) with physicians' assessment of fibrosis based on epidemiological, clinical, and biological parameters. METHODS: One hundred forty-two unselected patients with chronic hepatitis C were included. Liver biopsy and LSM were performed simultaneously. First, four physicians (two junior residents with limited experience in hepatology and two senior hepatologists) independently predicted the stage of fibrosis according to the METAVIR classification, using clinical, epidemiological, and biological data. For the second step, they were informed of LSM values and could modify their first evaluation if necessary. Finally, the two successive evaluations were compared with the histological fibrosis score. RESULTS: Providing LSM values improved agreement between physicians and resulted in a better correlation between clinical impression and histological liver fibrosis. The diagnostic performances were only significantly improved with transient elastography for the diagnosis of cirrhosis where assessment improved in three of the four physicians (AUROC [area under receiver operating characteristic curve]: 0.76 vs 0.87, 0.80 vs 0.87, and 0.83 vs 0.89, all p < 0.05). Moreover, these performances were nearly similar for junior and senior physicians when LSM was provided with the AUROC ranging from 0.69 to 0.72 for significant fibrosis and 0.87 to 0.90 for cirrhosis. CONCLUSIONS: Providing LSM values to physicians results in a better estimation of liver fibrosis and a more accurate diagnosis of cirrhosis. Moreover, it allows physicians with limited experience to predict liver fibrosis as well as experienced hepatologists.     

Competency in chest radiography

BACKGROUND: Accurate interpretation of chest radiographs (CXR) is essential as clinical decisions depend on readings. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate CXR interpretation ability at different levels of training and to determine factors associated with successful interpretation. DESIGN: Ten CXR were selected from the teaching file of the internal medicine (IM) department. Participants were asked to record the most important diagnosis, their certainty in that diagnosis, interest in a pulmonary career and adequacy of CXR training. Two investigators independently scored each CXR on a scale of 0 to 2. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (n=145) from a single teaching hospital were third year medical students (MS) (n=25), IM interns (n=44), IM residents (n=45), fellows from the divisions of cardiology and pulmonary/critical care (n=16), and radiology residents (n=15). RESULTS: The median overall score was 11 of 20. An increased level of training was associated with overall score (MS 8, intern 10, IM resident 13, fellow 15, radiology resident 18, P<.001). Overall certainty was significantly correlated with overall score (r=.613, P<.001). Internal medicine interns and residents interested in a pulmonary career scored 14 of 20 while those not interested scored 11 (P=.027). Pneumothorax, misplaced central line, and pneumoperitoneum were diagnosed correctly 9%, 26%, and 46% of the time, respectively. Only 20 of 131 (15%) participants felt their CXR training sufficient. CONCLUSION: We identified factors associated with successful CXR interpretation, including level of training, field of training, interest in a pulmonary career and overall certainty. Although interpretation improved with training, important diagnoses were missed.     

Initial airway management skills of senior residents: simulation training compared with traditional training

BACKGROUND: Scenario-based training (SBT) with a computerized patient simulator (CPS) is effective in teaching physicians to manage high-risk, low-frequency events that are typical of critical care medicine. This study compares the initial airway management skills of a group of senior internal medicine residents trained using SBT with CPS during their first year of postgraduate training (PGY) with a group of senior internal medicine residents trained using the traditional experiential method. METHODS: This was a prospective, controlled trial that compared two groups of PGY3 internal medicine residents at an urban teaching hospital. One group (n = 32) received training in initial airway management skills using SBT with CPS in their PGY1 (ie, the simulation-trained [ST] group). The second group (n = 30) received traditional residency training (ie, the traditionally trained [TT] group). Each group was then tested during PGY3 in initial airway management skills using a standardized respiratory arrest scenario. RESULTS: The ST group performed significantly better than the TT group in 8 of the 11 steps of the respiratory arrest scenario. Notable differences were found in the ability to attach a bag-valve mask (BVM) to high-flow oxygen (ST group, 69%; TT group, 17%; p < 0.001), correct insertion of oral airway (ST group, 88%; TT group, 20%; p < 0.001), and achieving an effective BVM seal (ST group, 97%; TT group, 20%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Traditional training consisting of 2 years of clinical experience was not sufficient to achieve proficiency in initial airway management skills, mostly due to inadequate equipment usage. This suggests that SBT with CPS is more effective in training medical residents than the traditional experiential method.     

The compactEASIE is a feasible training model for endoscopic novices: A prospective randomised trial

BACKGROUND: The objective benefit of a training using the compact Erlangen Active Simulator for Interventional Endoscopy-simulator was demonstrated in two prospective educational trials (New York, France). The present study analysed whether endoscopic novices are able to reach a comparable level of endoscopic skills as in the above-described projects. METHODS: Twenty-seven endoscopic novices (medical students, first year residents) were enrolled in this prospective, randomised trial. The compact Erlangen Active Simulator for Interventional Endoscopy-simulator with an upper GI-organ package and blood perfusion system was used as a training tool. Basic evaluation of endoscopic skills was performed after a practical and theoretical course in diagnostic upper GI endoscopy followed by a stratified randomisation according to the rating in endoscopic skills into intensive (n=14) and control group (n=13). The intensive group was trained 12 times every second week over 7 months in 4 endoscopic disciplines (manual skills, injection therapy, haemoclip, band ligation) by skilled endoscopist (three trainees/simulator). Assessment was performed (single steps/overall) using an analogue scale from 1 to 10 (1=worst, 10=optimal performance) by expert tutors. The control group was not trained. Blinded final evaluation of all participants was performed in January 2003. RESULTS: We observed in all techniques applied a significant improvement of endoscopic skills and of the performance time in the intensive group compared to the control group (p<0.001). The comparison with the previous projects showed that the intensively trained novices achieved comparable levels of performance to the GI fellows in the New York and France Project (at least 80% of the median score in three out of four techniques). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic novices acquired notable skills in interventional endoscopy in the simulator by an intensive, periodical training using the compactEASIE.     

Brief report: Beyond clinical experience: Features of data collection and interpretation that contribute to diagnostic accuracy

BACKGROUND: Clinical experience, features of data collection process, or both, affect diagnostic accuracy, but their respective role is unclear. OBJECTIVE, DESIGN: Prospective, observational study, to determine the respective contribution of clinical experience and data collection features to diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: Six Internists, 6 second year internal medicine residents, and 6 senior medical students worked up the same 7 cases with a standardized patient. Each encounter was audiotaped and immediately assessed by the subjects who indicated the reasons underlying their data collection. We analyzed the encounters according to diagnostic accuracy, information collected, organ systems explored, diagnoses evaluated, and final decisions made, and we determined predictors of diagnostic accuracy by logistic regression models. RESULTS: Several features significantly predicted diagnostic accuracy after correction for clinical experience: early exploration of correct diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] 24.35) or of relevant diagnostic hypotheses (OR 2.22) to frame clinical data collection, larger number of diagnostic hypotheses evaluated (OR 1.08), and collection of relevant clinical data (OR 1.19). CONCLUSION: Some features of data collection and interpretation are related to diagnostic accuracy beyond clinical experience and should be explicitly included in clinical training and modeled by clinical teachers. Thoroughness in data collection should not be considered a privileged way to diagnostic success.     

Do physicians know when their diagnoses are correct?

OBJECTIVE: This study explores the alignment between physicians' confidence in their diagnoses and the "correctness" of these diagnoses, as a function of clinical experience, and whether subjects were prone to over-or underconfidence. DESIGN: Prospective, counterbalanced experimental design. SETTING: Laboratory study conducted under controlled conditions at three academic medical centers. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-two senior medical students, 72 senior medical residents, and 72 faculty internists. INTERVENTION: We created highly detailed, 2-to 4-page synopses of 36 diagnostically challenging medical cases, each with a definitive correct diagnosis. Subjects generated a differential diagnosis for each of 9 assigned cases, and indicated their level of confidence in each diagnosis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A differential was considered "correct" if the clinically true diagnosis was listed in that subject's hypothesis list. To assess confidence, subjects rated the likelihood that they would, at the time they generated the differential, seek assistance in reaching a diagnosis. Subjects' confidence and correctness were "mildly" aligned (kappa=.314 for all subjects, .285 for faculty, .227 for residents, and .349 for students). Residents were overconfident in 41% of cases where their confidence and correctness were not aligned, whereas faculty were overconfident in 36% of such cases and students in 25%. CONCLUSIONS: Even experienced clinicians may be unaware of the correctness of their diagnoses at the time they make them. Medical decision support systems, and other interventions designed to reduce medical errors, cannot rely exclusively on clinicians' perceptions of their needs for such support.     

B‐type natriuretic peptide in the evaluation and management of dyspnoea in primary care

Abstract. Burri E, Hochholzer K, Arenja N, Martin‐Braschler H, Kaestner L, Gekeler H, Hatziisaak T, Büttiker M, Fräulin A, Potocki M, Breidthardt T, Reichlin T, Socrates T, Twerenbold R, Mueller C (University Hospital Basel, Basel; University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland). B‐type natriuretic peptide in the evaluation and management of dyspnoea in primary care. J Intern Med 2012; 272: 504–513. Objectives. The rapid and accurate diagnosis of heart failure in primary care is a major unmet clinical need. We evaluated the additional use of B‐type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels. Design. A randomized controlled trial. Setting. Twenty‐nine primary care physicians in Switzerland and Germany coordinated by the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland. Subjects. A total of 323 consecutive patients presenting with dyspnoea. Interventions. Assignment in a 1 : 1 ratio to a diagnostic strategy including point‐of‐care measurement of BNP (n = 163) or standard assessment without BNP (n = 160). The total medical cost at 3 months was the primary end‐point. Secondary end‐points were diagnostic certainty, time to appropriate therapy, functional capacity, hospitalization and mortality. The final diagnosis was adjudicated by a physician blinded to the BNP levels. Results. Heart failure was the final diagnosis in 34% of patients. The number of hospitalizations, functional status and total medical cost at 3 months [median $1655, interquartile range (IQR), 850–3331 vs. $1541, IQR 859–2827; P = 0.68] were similar in both groups. BNP increased diagnostic certainty as defined by the need for further diagnostic work‐up (33% vs. 45%; P = 0.02) and accelerated the initiation of the appropriate treatment (13 days vs. 25 days; P = 0.01). The area under the receiver‐operating characteristics curve for BNP to identify heart failure was 0.87 (95% confidence interval, 0.81–0.93). Conclusions. The use of BNP levels in primary care did not reduce total medical cost, but improved some of the secondary end‐points including diagnostic certainty and time to initiation of appropriate treatment.     

Consistency of physicians' legal standard and personal judgments of competency in patients with Alzheimer's disease

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the consistency of physician judgments of treatment consent capacity (competency) for patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) when specific legal standards (LS) for competency are used, and to identify the LS most clinically relevant to experienced physicians. DESIGN: Control and AD patient participants were videotaped being administered a measure of capacity to consent to medical treatment. Study physicians viewed videotapes of these assessments individually and made competency judgments for each participant under different LS followed by their own personal judgment of competency. SETTING: A university medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 10 older controls and 21 patients with AD (10 with mild and 11 with moderate AD). Five physicians with experience assessing the competency of AD patients were recruited from the geriatric psychiatry, geriatric medicine, and neurology services of a university medical center. MEASUREMENTS: The 31 participants were videotaped performing on a measure of treatment consent capacity (Capacity to Consent to Treatment Instrument) (CCTI). The CCTI consists of two clinical vignettes (A-neoplasm and B-cardiac) that test competency under five LS. Vignette A and B assessments were videotaped separately for each participant (total videotapes for sample = 62). Each study physician viewed each videotaped vignette individually, made judgments under each of the LS (competent or incompetent), and then made his/her own personal competency judgment. Physicians were blinded to participant diagnosis. Within participant group, consistency of physician judgments was evaluated across LS and personal judgments using percentage agreement and kappa. Agreement between personal and LS judgments for the AD group was evaluated for each physician using logistic regression. RESULTS: As expected, physicians as a group generally demonstrated very high percentage agreement in their LS and personal competency judgments for the control group. For the AD group, mean percentage judgment agreement among physicians ranged from a high of 84% (LS1) (evidencing a treatment choice) to a low of 67% (LS3) (appreciating consequences of treatment choice). Mean percentage agreement for personal competency judgments was 76%. For the AD sample, kappa analyses for physicians as a group demonstrated significant agreement not attributable to chance for LS5 (understanding treatment situation/choices) (k = 0.57, P = .001), LS4 (providing rational reasons for treatment choice) (k = 0.39, P = .04), and also for personal judgments (k = 0.48, P = .009). Analysis of LS judgment agreement within physician indicated that physicians applied the LS as discrete standards. Within-physician and for the AD sample, personal competency judgments were associated significantly with judgments on LS5 (P = .001), LS4 (P = .004), and LS3 (P < .04). CONCLUSIONS: Experienced physicians demonstrated significant agreement assessing competency in AD patients when judgments were based upon specific legal standards. Personal competency judgments of physicians showed a substantially higher level of agreement than found in a previous study, where specific LS were not used. These results suggest that consistency of physician competency judgments can be enhanced if they are guided by knowledge of specific LS. Physicians' personal competency judgments were most closely associated with comprehension and reasoning LS, the most conservative and clinically appropriate standards for deciding competency.     

The effect of working serial night shifts on the cognitive functioning of emergency physicians

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether working 5 serial night shifts in the emergency department results in a decline in physician performance as measured with an intelligence test. METHODS: This study compared the cognitive functioning of emergency physicians who worked the day shift (7 AM to 5 pm) with those who worked 5 consecutive night shifts (11 pm to 7 am). The Fluid Scale of the Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test (KAIT) was administered to 16 emergency medicine residents. Half of the residents (group A) were tested while working day shifts, and the other half (group B) were tested after working 5 consecutive night shifts. After a minimum interval of 2 months, the residents were retested in reverse order, with group A tested after working night shifts and group B tested while working day shifts. RESULTS: A total of 16 emergency medicine residents were tested. A paired t test was used to determine whether day-shift KAIT scores are different from night-shift KAIT scores. The mean day-shift KAIT score was 119.1 (SD=7.7), and the mean night-shift KAIT score was 107.2 (SD=10.2). This difference was significant (mean difference=11.9; 95% confidence interval 7.0 to 16.8; P <.001), with the day-shift scores being statistically higher than the night-shift scores. CONCLUSION: Working a series of 5 night shifts results in a substantial decline in cognitive performance in physicians working in the ED.     

Real-time ultrasound for the detection of deep venous thrombosis

PURPOSE: Accurate diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is a clinical problem in emergency practice. A prospective trial was conducted comparing real-time ultrasound with contrast venography in the diagnosis of proximal DVT. METHODS: Seventy patients whose clinical presentations mandated diagnostic evaluation for DVT had real-time ultrasound of the involved leg followed by contrast venography. Initial readings of ultrasound and venography were compared with each other and with final readings to assess reliability of interpretation. RESULTS: Final ultrasound readings agreed with final venogram readings in all patients. Negative initial ultrasound readings agreed with final venogram readings in 56 of 56 patients (negative predictive value, 100%; 95% confidence interval, 94 to 100). Eighteen patients had positive initial ultrasound readings compared with 14 who had positive final venogram readings (positive predictive value, 78%; 95% confidence interval, 55 to 91). CONCLUSION: Negative real-time ultrasonography reliably excludes proximal DVT. Positive ultrasound reliably diagnoses proximal DVT only in experienced hands.     

Checking for breathing: evaluation of the diagnostic capability of emergency medical services personnel, physicians, medical students, and medical laypersons

STUDY OBJECTIVE: International guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) recommend determination of unconsciousness, breathlessness, and absence of pulse to diagnose cardiorespiratory arrest. Thus far, there have been no scientifically proven data available regarding the quality of assessing breathlessness. The study objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of checking for breathing in an emergency situation, to determine the necessary amount of time until diagnosis, and to document used techniques. METHODS: Four different populations were tested for their ability to assess breathlessness: emergency medical services (EMS) personnel, physicians, medical students, and laypersons. Each participant was asked to perform the diagnostic procedure twice, first with a breathing or not-breathing unresponsive test person and then with a modified megacode manikin (with the possibility of simulated respiratory function). The order of testing and the respiratory status were strictly randomized. Diagnostic accuracy, time interval to diagnosis, and used techniques were documented. RESULTS: A total of 261 persons were tested in 522 trials, with a median time interval of 12 seconds for obtaining a diagnosis. Regarding all participants, the correct diagnosis was achieved in 81.0% (EMS personnel, 89.7%; physicians, 84.5%; medical students, 78.4%; laypersons, 71.5%). Only 55.6% of all participants showed correct diagnostic skills (EMS personnel, 91.3%; physicians, 51.5%; medical students, 61.9%; laypersons, 18.5%). CONCLUSION: Checking for breathing was shown to be mostly inaccurate and unreliable. This diagnostic procedure takes more time than recommended in international guidelines. Therefore CPR training should focus more on the determination of breathlessness. Also, the guidelines for CPR should be revised.     

Predictors of advance directive restrictiveness and compliance with institutional policy in a long-term-care facility.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain factors influencing the level of advance directives selected by nursing home residents or surrogates and the time delay to documentation of these choices in the medical record after implementation of a facility-wide policy. DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study of nursing home residents followed from date of advance directive policy initiation or time of admission for a maximum of 21 months from study commencement. SETTING: A 315-bed multilevel nursing home. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred twenty-four nursing home residents (mean age 85, 74.9% female, 96.1% white). OUTCOME MEASURES: Level of advance directive status chosen--full code, do not resuscitate (DNR) or palliative care only--and date documented in the medical record. RESULTS: Factors predictive of restricted advance directives (DNR or palliative care) included age greater than 85 years (P = 0.025), documented use of a surrogate decision maker (P = 0.001), low physical function (P less than 0.001), low cognitive function (P less than 0.001), and having a nursing home-employed physician (P = 0.001). These results were confirmed using logistic regression models. Median time to directive documentation decreased from 54 days for residents admitted in the first quarter to 1 day for residents admitted in the fourth quarter of the year following initiation of an advance directive policy. CONCLUSION: In logistic models, nursing home-employed physicians were more likely to write restricted advance directive orders than community-based physicians even after controlling for resident age, cognitive status, and physical function. In addition, implementation of a formal nursing home advance directive policy can shorten time to physician documentation of resident advance directive status.     

Junior versus senior physicians for informing families of intensive care unit patients

To compare the effectiveness of information delivered to family members of critically ill patients by junior and senior physicians, we performed a prospective randomized multicenter trial in 11 French intensive care units. Patients (n = 220) were allocated at random to having their family members receive information by only junior or only senior physicians throughout the intensive care unit stay; there were 92 and 93 evaluable cases in the junior and senior groups, respectively, with no significant differences in baseline characteristics. Between Days 3 and 5, one family representative per patient was evaluated for comprehension of the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment in the patient; satisfaction with information and care; and presence of symptoms of anxiety and depression. No significant differences were found between the two groups for any of these three criteria. Family members informed by a junior physician were more likely to feel they had not been given enough information time (additional time wanted: 3 [0-6.5] vs. 0 [0-5] minutes, p = 0.01) and to have sought additional explanations from their usual doctor (48.9 vs. 34.4%, p = 0.004). Specialty residents, if given opportunities for acquiring experience, can become proficient in communicating with families and share this task with senior physicians.