Cytomegalovirus prophylaxis with valganciclovir in African-American renal allograft recipients based on donor/recipient serostatus

There is a paucity of data examining the efficacy of valganciclovir (VGC) for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in kidney transplant patients, particularly with regard to utilization of a risk-stratified dosing regimen. Eighty adult African-American (AA) renal allograft recipients transplanted from November 3, 2001 to May 28, 2003 and followed for 22 +/- 8 months received VGC once daily for 90 d post-transplant dosed according to donor/recipient (D/R) serostatus: high risk (D+/R-) received 900 mg (n = 12); moderate risk (D+/R+, D-/R+) received 450 mg (n = 60); and low risk (D-/R-) received no prophylaxis (n = 8). Thymoglobulin or basiliximab was used for induction, and mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone, and either tacrolimus or sirolimus for maintenance immunosuppression. Only six patients (7.5%) developed symptomatic CMV infection diagnosed by pp65 antigenemia, three in the high-risk (25%) and three in the moderate-risk (5%) group (p = 0.02). All patients were on tacrolimus for at least 3 months prior to diagnosis. There were no cases of tissue-invasive disease, resistance to treatment, or recurrence. D+/R- serostatus was the only significant independent predictor for CMV infection using multivariate analysis (odds ratio 10.5; p = 0.04). Thymoglobulin induction was not associated with CMV infection. None of 43 patients who were exposed to sirolimus for >30 d developed CMV infection, vs. six of 37 who were not (p = 0.006). We conclude that VGC dosed according to D/R serostatus provides safe and effective CMV prophylaxis in AA renal allograft recipients.     

Cytomegalovirus infection in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION: In this open-label multicenter study, 205 simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant recipients between 1998 and 2000 were randomly assigned to tacrolimus or cyclosporine-microemulsion (ME). All patients received concomitant rATG induction therapy, mycophenolate mofetil and short-term corticosteroids. We report the 3-year data related to the occurrence, severity and effect of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections. The type of CMV prophylaxis and treatment was at the discretion of the investigator. RESULTS: The overall incidence of CMV infection was 34% with no difference in incidence between the tacrolimus and cyclosporine-ME treatment arms. Statistically significant fewer CMV infections occurred among patients who received ganciclovir (22%) than those who did not receive prophylaxis (42%; P = .0075) or were treated with acyclovir (43%; P = .0066). The CMV infection rate according to donor recipient CMV serological status was: D-/R- group 11%, which was lower than the D-/R+ group at 40% (P = .0035), the D+/R+ group at 37% (P = .0024), or the D+/R- group at 52% (P = .00001). Among the last three groups, the infection rate was lower in patients on ganciclovir than those with no prophylaxis or on acyclovir (22% vs 64%; P = .00001). The incidence of acute rejection episodes was higher among patients without ganciclovir prophylaxis. No difference was observed in actuarial patient, kidney, or pancreas survival rates between patients with versus without infection. CONCLUSIONS: Ganciclovir prophylaxis effectively prevented CMV infection in SPK transplant recipients, especially in higher risk groups. An effect of CMV prophylaxis on the incidence of rejection is possible.     

Effect of donor-recipient cytomegalovirus serologic status on outcomes in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant recipients

Diabetic patients undergoing simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SKPT) may be at high risk for developing cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. To study this issue, we analyzed 297 SKPT patients enrolled into a multicenter trial of two daclizumab dosing strategies versus no antibody induction in combination with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. Complete donor (D) and recipient (R) CMV serology values were available in 294 cases and were distributed as follows: 86 (29%) D+/R-. Eighty-six (29%) D+R+; 45 (16%) D-/R+; 77 (26%) D-/R-; CMV antiviral prophylaxis was center specific, but 98% of patients received either ganciclovir or acyclovir. No differences existed in demographic or transplant characteristics or immunosuppressive regimens among the four groups except that more African-American SKPT recipients were CMV positive at transplant (P <.001). At 6 months, no differences were seen in patient and graft survival rates (GSR) and the incidence of acute rejection (AR) among the groups. However, the CMV D+/R- group had a significantly higher incidence of CMV infection/disease (14%) than the other groups collectively (4%, P <.05). Most cases of CMV infection/disease occurred greater than 3 months posttransplant when prophylaxis was discontinued. In the D-/R- group, the pancreas GSR was higher (94% vs 86% in the remaining three groups) and the incidence of AR was lower (16% vs 25% in the remaining three groups, both P =.09). Primary CMV exposure remains a major risk factor for CMV infection/disease, but does not have an adverse impact on short-term outcomes. Conversely, protective CMV seronegative matching may have a beneficial effect on outcomes.     

Risk factors and impact of cytomegalovirus disease in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The relevance of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in simultaneous pancreas kidney (SPK) transplant recipients in the modern era of immunosuppression and antiviral therapeutics is largely unquantified. We sought to determine the risk factors of CMV disease and its impact on SPK transplant outcomes in recipients all receiving a consistent regime of maintenance immunosuppression and CMV prophylaxis. METHODS: This is a retrospective, single center study of 100 consecutive SPK transplant recipients. All received maintenance immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and prednisone. CMV prophylaxis consisted of a short course of parenteral gancyclovir followed by oral gancyclovir. Recipients at high-risk (D+/R-) for CMV also received CMV hyperimmune globulin. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for CMV disease and risk factors for adverse outcomes in SPK transplantation were determined. The effect of duration of prophylaxis on timing and severity of CMV disease in high-risk (D+/R-) SPK transplant recipients was also evaluated. RESULTS: The actual 1-year rate of CMV disease was 17.0% (12.0% noninvasive, 5.0% tissue invasive); and according to donor and recipient CMV serological status was: D-/R+: 0%; D-/R-: 2.8%; D+/R+: 25.6%; and D+/R-: 40.6%. Multivariate analysis showed transplantation of organs from a donor with positive CMV serology to be predictive of CMV disease with a relative risk of 63.37 (P=0.0052). In the high-risk (D+/R-) subgroup, the duration of prophylactic therapy delayed onset of CMV disease, but had minimal effect on severity. Invasive CMV disease was an independent predictor of mortality but did not decrease kidney or pancreas allograft survival. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of SPK transplantation have improved in the current era of modern immunosuppression, yet CMV remains an important pathogen. The serological status of the organ donor and the duration of CMV prophylaxis are predictive of who and when CMV disease may occur. Nevertheless, new strategies that reduce risk and severity of CMV disease are still needed.     

Infectious enteritis after intestinal transplantation: incidence, timing, and outcome

BACKGROUND: The study reviews the incidence, timing, and outcome of infectious enteritis (IE) after intestinal transplantation (ITx). METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent ITx at a single institution between 1991 and 2003 was undertaken using database and medical records. Standard statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of 33 ITx recipients, 13 (39%) developed 20 culture- or biopsy-proven episodes of IE. Recipient demographics included the following: 10 males, median age 34 (10-585) months, 11 liver + intestine grafts, and two isolated intestine grafts. Infections were diagnosed a median of 76 days (32-1,800 days) after ITx. There were 14 viral (one cytomegalovirus, eight rotavirus, four adenovirus, one Epstein-Barr virus), three bacterial (Clostridium difficile), and three protozoal (one Giardia lamblia, two Cryptosporidium) infections. The bacterial infections tended to present earlier than the viral infections, and the most frequent presenting symptom was diarrhea. Complete resolution was achieved in 17 (94%) incidences with the appropriate antimicrobial or conservative therapy. It was interesting that there were seven rejection episodes documented by biopsy at the approximate time of diagnosis of IE. There were two graft losses: one because of adenoviral enteritis and one because of rejection after rotavirus enteritis. Three-year patient survival is 74% with no deaths directly attributable to IE. CONCLUSIONS: IE can occur in 39% of recipients after ITx. Viral agents are the cause in two thirds of the cases. With supportive care and appropriate treatment, resolution is possible in the majority of cases. Differentiating rejection and infection on histopathology can be difficult and relies on cultures and immunostaining.     

Who among cytomegalovirus-seropositive liver transplant recipients is at risk for cytomegalovirus infection?

A vast majority of the transplant recipients are cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seropositive (R+). We sought to assess variables predictive of CMV infection, specifically in R+ liver transplant recipients. Study patients comprised 182 consecutive liver transplant recipients who survived at least 14 days after transplantation. Surveillance testing was used to detect CMV infection. Pre-emptive therapy was employed for the prevention of CMV disease, however, no antiviral prophylaxis was used for CMV infection. CMV infection developed in 32.5% (38 of 117) of R+ patients, 84.6% (33 of 39) of R-/D+, and 3.8% (1 of 26) of R-/D- patients. In R+ patients, Hispanic race (21.6% vs. 7.8%, P = 0.06), donor CMV seropositivity (73.7% vs. 45.6%, P = 0.005), and hepatocellular carcinoma (23.7% vs. 6.3%, P = 0.05) correlated with a higher risk of CMV infection. In a multivariate model, Hispanic race (OR: 3.5, 95% CI: 1.03-11.6, P = 0.045), donor CMV serostatus (OR: 4.0, 95% CI: 1.6-10.2, P = 0.003) and hepatocellular carcinoma (OR: 5.8, 95% CI: 1.6-20.5, P = 0.006) were all significant independent predictors of CMV infection. The aforementioned variables did not portend a higher risk of CMV infection in R-/D+ patients; donor CMV seropositivity overwhelmed all other risk factors in R- patients (P < 0.00001). In conclusion, CMV-seropositive liver transplant recipients at risk for CMV infection can be identified based on readily assessable variables. Preventive strategies may be selectively targeted toward these patients.     

Cell-Mediated Immunity to Predict Cytomegalovirus Disease in High-Risk Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Late-onset cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease commonly occurs after discontinuation of antiviral prophylaxis. We determined the utility of testing CD8+ T-cell response against CMV as a predictor of late-onset CMV disease after a standard course of antiviral prophylaxis. Transplant patients at high-risk for CMV disease were enrolled. CD8+ T-cell-mediated immunity (CMI) was tested using the QuantiFERON-CMV assay at baseline, 1, 2 and 3 months posttransplant by measurement of interferon-γ response to whole blood stimulation with a 21-peptide pool. The primary outcome was the ability of CMI testing to predict CMV disease in the first 6 months posttransplant. There were 108 evaluable patients (D+/R+ n = 39; D-/R+ n = 34; D+/R- n = 35) of whom 18 (16.7%) developed symptomatic CMV disease. At the end of prophylaxis, CMI was detectable in 38/108 (35.2%) patients (cutoff 0.1 IU/mL interferon-γ). CMV disease occurred in 2/38 (5.3%) patients with a detectable interferon-γ response versus 16/70 (22.9%) patients with a negative response; p = 0.038. In the subgroup of D+/R- patients, CMV disease occurred in 1/10 (10.0%) patients with a detectable interferon-γ response (cutoff 0.1 IU/mL) versus 10/25 (40.0%) patients with a negative CMI, p = 0.12. Monitoring of CMI may be useful for predicting late-onset CMV disease.     

Infectious complications after multivisceral transplantation in adults

It is thought that multivisceral transplantation requires high levels of immunosuppression and therefore, patients run an increased risk of infection. We retrospectively reviewed our center's experience with clinically relevant infectious complications. PATIENTS: Between 2000 and 2005, 10 adult patients underwent multivisceral transplantation. Two immunosuppression protocols were used: between 2000 and 2003, a high immunosupression protocol (six patients; daclizumab induction, tacrolimus trough levels >20 ng/mL and steroids) and an immunomodulatory, low imunosuppression scheme from 2003 onward (four patients; ATG induction, tacrolimus levels 5 to 10 ng/mL, no steroids). Standard antimicrobial prophylaxis consisted of vancomycin, meropenem, and amphotericin B. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis was used in all but first two cases. Donor and recipient CMV status were D+/R+ (n = 7), D+/R- (n = 2), D-/R+ (n = 1). RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 627 days (range, 19 to 2207 days). A total of 47 infectious episodes were recorded in all patients (range 1 to 14 per patient). The etiology was bacterial in 32 (69%), viral in 8 (17%), and fungal in 7 (14%) cases. The most frequent were catheter related (n = 13) followed by respiratory (n = 7), intraabdominal (n = 6), and wound infections (n = 5). Symptomatic viral infection of the graft (CMV gastritis or enteritis, adenoviral enteritis) was also encountered. Epstein-Barr virus was transiently detected in the serum of nine patients, one of whom later developed posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). Three deaths all among patients receiving high immunosuppression were owing to infectious complications: pulmonary PTLD at 4 months posttransplantation, ruptured mycotic aneurysm after 8 weeks, and sepsis after 3 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Infections accounted for a high morbidity after multivisceral transplantation, representing the leading cause of mortality. Exhaustive monitoring, early antimicrobial intervention, and lower immunosuppression may improve the outcome.     

Impact of valganciclovir prophylaxis on the development of severe late-cytomegalovirus disease in high-risk solid organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: With the introduction of prolonged prophylaxis with valganciclovir in cytomegalovirus (CMV) donor/recipient serodiscordance (D+/R-) patients, concerns about a high incidence of late and invasive CMV disease associated with mortality have emerged. We compared the characteristics of CMV disease in D+/R- patients receiving prolonged valganciclovir prophylaxis with R+ patients. METHODS: We prospectively followed all solid organ transplant recipients from January 2004 to December 2005. CMV prophylaxis with valganciclovir or ganciclovir was administered as follows: donor- recipient serodiscordance (D+/R-), 12 weeks; induction with antithymocyte globulin or acute rejection episodes requiring steroid pulses, 15 to 30 days; and CMV R+ double kidney-pancreas, 15 days. Transplant characteristics and the development of CMV disease variables were collected for all patients. We defined 2 groups according to the risk of CMV disease: CMV donor/recipient mismatch (D+/R-) and recipient CMV-positive (R+) groups. RESULTS: During the study period we performed 481 solid organ transplantations: 237 kidney, 34 kidney-pancreas, 157 liver, 38 heart, 13 liver-kidney, and 2 heart-kidney. Overall, 36 patients developed CMV disease (7.5%). CMV donor-recipient mismatch (D+/R-) was associated with a greater risk of CMV disease compared with CMV-positive recipients (16% vs 7%; P = .036). Prophylaxis against CMV was longer in the D+/R- group (mean days 73 vs 15; P < .001). CMV disease appeared later in the D+/R- than in R+ group (mean days 123 vs 59; P < .001). We observed a trend toward a lower incidence of tissue-invasive CMV disease among the D+/R- group compared with the R+ group without significance (14% vs 41%; P = .382). Three patients died in the first 30 days after the onset of CMV disease, all of them in the R+ group. CONCLUSIONS: In our setting, high-risk patients (D+/R-) receiving prolonged prophylaxis with valganciclovir developed later CMV disease, but this was neither more tissue-invasive nor more life-threatening than in the R+ group.     

Early and Late Virological Monitoring of Cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr Virus, and Human Herpes Virus 6 Infections in Small Bowel/Multivisceral Transplant Recipients

Background

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) are the major causes of graft failure and posttransplantation mortality among small bowel and multivisceral transplantations (SB/MVT). Little is known about human herpes virus 6 (HHV-6) infections in transplant recipients.

Study Purpose

The purposes of this study were to analyze the clinical relevance of CMV, EBV, and HHV-6 infections after small bowel transplantation and to establish whether routine monitoring for HHV-6 infection should be recommended for the prevention of severe complications in this population.

Methods

Ten adult patients were monitored based on CMV, EBV, and HHV6 DNA quantifications in blood and biopsy tissue samples. Three patients were monitored for at least 5 months (early period) and 7 patients were monitored for 1 to 5 years after transplantation (late period).

Results

In the early period, despite prophylaxis all 3 patients developed symptomatic CMV infections: 1 fever/diarrhea, 1 enteritis and rejection, as well as 1 fever and pneumonia. Only 1 patient developed EBV and HHV-6 infections. The average time of onset of CMV infection was 3 months after transplantation and only 24 days for HHV6 infection. In the late period, of the 7 SB/MVT recipients only 1 developed an EBV infection at 2 years after transplantation. No CMV or HHV-6 infections were identified in any patient.

Conclusions

CMV infection is a major cause of organ disease and rejection in the early period after transplantation. EBV infection in adult recipients must be considered also in the late period, particularly in association with severe immunosuppression. Because HHV-6 infection occurs earlier than CMV/EBV, it may serve as an indicator for more intense virological surveillance.     

Multivariate analysis of the influence of donor and recipient cytomegalovirus sero-pairing on outcomes in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation: the South-Eastern Organ Procurement Foundation Experience

The purpose of this study was to determine if donor (D) and recipient (R) CMV sero-pairing at the time of simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SKPT) subsequently influenced outcomes in a large cohort of patients with long-term follow-up. Between January 1, 1997 and December 31, 1999 complete data were available on 723 primary SKPTs performed at South-Eastern Organ Procurement Foundation member institutions. For purposes of this study, four groups were defined: D+/R-, n = 203 (28%); D+/R+, n = 206 (28%); D-/R+, n = 156 (22%); and D-/R-, n = 158 (22%). Patient and graft survival rates for the study groups were computed by Kaplan-Meier estimates and tests of equality of survival curves were performed utilizing both the log-rank and Wilcoxon test statistics. A multivariate analysis was performed using a Cox proportional hazards model and logistic regression. A total of 56% of Ds were CMV+ and 50% of Rs were CMV-. D serostatus was not, but R serostatus was, a significant independent risk factor for patient and kidney, but not pancreas, graft survival rates in the uncensored analysis. When examining the CMV D/R groups in both univariate and multivariate fashion, CMV sero-pairing was not an independent risk factor for death, graft loss, or rejection. However, when considering CMV sero-pairing as a binary variable (D-/R- versus all other D/R groups), 6-year patient, kidney, and pancreas graft survival rates were significantly higher in the D-/R- group (P < .05). In conclusion, CMV seronegativity is present in half of diabetic patients at the time of SKPT, and protective CMV seronegative matching confers a long-term survival advantage.     

Predictive factors for cytomegalovirus infection after orthotopic liver transplantation using an ultrasensitive polymerase chain reaction assay

The predictive factors for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in de novo liver transplant patients were determined at 3 months posttransplantation. We included all consecutive patients except those who died or who had lost their graft within 1 month posttransplant. We recorded both donor (D) and recipient (R) data. Immunosuppression utilized tacrolimus, steroids, with or without mycophenolate mofetil, and/or induction therapy with anti-CD25 monoclonal antibodies. CMV prophylaxis was administered only to those at high risk of CMV infection, namely, D+/R- patients. These cases received intravenous ganciclovir at 500 mg/d for the first 2 weeks followed by oral ganciclovir at 500 mg for the following 3 months. The median time to CMV infection was 1 month. The significant predictive factors for CMV infection were D/R CMV status, (P = .002): D+/R+ versus other patients (P = .01), D-/R- versus other patients (P = .002), D+ versus D- (P = .009). In addition infection was associated with the original liver disease (hepatitis C virus infection or alcohol-related cirrhosis; P = .03), R+ vs. R- (P = .03), donor age (<45 or >45 years; P = .01), lymphocyte count at M2 (< or >1300/mm(3); P = .02), hemoglobin levels at 1 and 3 months, and platelet and white blood cell counts at day 7. The independent predictive factors were recipient CMV sero-status (R+ vs R-; odds ratio = 10.2), donor age >45 years (odds ratio = 11.4) and lymphocyte count at M2 <1300/mm(3) (odds ratio = 7.33). This study showed that the major factors associated with CMV infection were recipient CMV status, donor age, and lymphocyte count.     

Delayed-onset primary cytomegalovirus disease after liver transplantation.

Clinical practice guidelines recommend antiviral prophylaxis to cytomegalovirus (CMV) donor-positive/recipient-negative (D+/R-) liver transplant recipients. We assessed the outcome of this strategy by determining the incidence, clinical features, and risk factors of CMV disease among CMV D+/R- liver transplant recipients who received antiviral prophylaxis. Sixty-seven CMV D+/R- liver transplant recipients (mean age+/-standard deviation: 49.5+/-11.4 years; 75% male) received oral ganciclovir [n=9 (13%)] or valganciclovir [n=58 (87%)] prophylaxis for a median duration of 92 days (interquartile range: 91-100). No breakthrough CMV disease was observed during antiviral prophylaxis. However, primary CMV disease was observed in 2%, 25%, 27%, 27%, and 29% of patients at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively, after antiviral prophylaxis was stopped. The incidence of delayed-onset primary CMV disease was similar between those who received oral ganciclovir and valganciclovir. Nine (47%) patients had CMV syndrome, 8 (42%) had gastrointestinal CMV disease, and 2 (11%) had CMV hepatitis. Female patients (P=0.01) and younger age at transplant (P=0.03) were associated with an increased risk, whereas diabetes mellitus (P<0.001) was significantly associated with a lower risk of delayed-onset primary CMV disease. Allograft loss or mortality occurred in 8 (12%) patients during the median follow-up period of 3.31 (range: 0.8-5.9) years. No significant association was observed between CMV disease and patient and allograft survival. In conclusion, CMV disease remains a common complication in CMV D+/R- liver transplant patients during the contemporary era of antiviral prophylaxis. Female patients and younger patients are at increased risk of delayed-onset primary CMV disease.     

Infectious enteritis after intestinal transplantation: incidence, timing, and outcome

AIM: To review the incidence, timing, and outcome of infectious enteritis after intestinal transplantation (IT). METHOD: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing IT at a single institution between 1991 and 2003 was analyze with standard statistical tools. RESULTS: Among 33 IT recipients, 13 (39%) developed 20 culture- or biopsy-proven episodes of infectious enteritis. The recipient demographics were 77% men and median age 2.6 years. Infections were diagnosed at a median of 76 days (32 to 1800) after IT. There were 14 viral (CMV one, rotavirus eight, adenovirus four, EBV one, three bacterial (Clostridium difficile), and three other infections (Giardia lamblia one, cryptosporidium two). Complete resolution was achieved in 17 (94%) infectious after appropriate antimicrobial or conservative therapy. Interestingly, there were six rejection episodes following infectious enteritis. Grafts were lost to rejection after rotaviral enteritis (n = 1) and adenoviral enteritis misdiagnosed as rejection (n = 1). Patient and graft survival were not adversely affected by infections. CONCLUSIONS: Infectious enteritis occurs frequently after IT. Viral agents are the cause in two-thirds of cases. With supportive care and appropriate treatment, resolution is possible in the majority of cases. Differentiating rejection and infection by histopathology can be difficult.     

Gancyclovir prophylaxis in high risk patients

The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease between seronegative recipients who received a CMV seropositive kidney (D+/R-) and seropositive recipients who received a CMV seropositive kidney (D+/R+). Among 42 patients included in the study, 26 were D+/R-, and the other 16 were D+/R+. Immunosuppression was based on cyclosporine (n = 12), tacrolimus (n = 28), or other agents (n = 2). Twenty-four seronegative patients were treated with gancyclovir for 3 months. The 16 D+/R+ patients did not receive CMV prophylaxis. Two D+/R- patients did not receive gancyclovir prophylaxis because of various health problems just after the surgery. Over the year post-renal transplant, there were 10 (23.8%) episodes of CMV disease. The two D+/R- patients who were not treated with gancyclovir developed CMV disease. The incidence of disease was higher in patients who were given cyclosporine (41.7% vs 17.9%). In conclusion, sero negative patients who received a kidney from a seropositive donor had greater risk of developing CMV disease. Despite gancyclovir treatment, the incidence was higher than in D+/R+ cases without treatment.     

Long-term results of CMV hyperimmune globulin prophylaxis in 377 heart transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) has emerged as the most important pathogen to affect the post-operative course after heart transplantation. We performed a retrospective analysis to evaluate the efficiency of CMV hyperimmune globulin (CMVIG) prophylaxis in preventing CMV disease in aggressively immunosuppressed patients after heart transplantation. METHODS: We studied 377 heart transplant recipients who received quadruple-immunosuppressive therapy and CMVIG as sole CMV prophylaxis. The study population was categorized into 4 groups according to donor and recipient CMV serology at the time of transplantation (D+/R+, D+/R-, D-/R+, D-/R-) and was monitored for CMV immediate early antigen in peripheral blood cells, in urine sediments, and in throat washings; for the presence of serum CMV immunoglobulin M and CMV immunoglobulin G; and for clinical evidence of CMV-related symptoms. In addition, we compared the incidence of cardiac allograft vasculopathy and infection among the groups. RESULTS: During the first 5 years after transplantation, CMV disease developed in 79 patients (20.96%). Comparison among the groups showed significantly increased risk for CMV disease in allograft recipients of organs from seropositive donors (D+, 27.31%; D-, 11.33%; p = 0.0003). We observed 6 CMV-associated deaths, all in CMV-antibody-negative recipients. Additionally CMV-positive recipients had a greater incidence of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (p = 0.048), and a greater overall infection rate (p = 0.0034). CONCLUSIONS: Cytomegalovirus hyperimmune globulin administration prevents CMV disease and infection in aggressively immunosuppressed heart transplant recipients. Because fatal CMV disease in CMV-negative recipients of organs from seropositive donors could not be prevented with CMVIG alone, we recommend the additional use of prophylactic ganciclovir in this CMV-mismatched population.     

Prophylactic Versus Preemptive Oral Valganciclovir for the Management of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Adult Renal Transplant Recipients

Prophylaxis reduces cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease, but is associated with increased costs and risks for side effects, viral resistance and late onset CMV disease. Preemptive therapy avoids drug costs but requires frequent monitoring and may not prevent complications of asymptomatic CMV replication. Kidney transplant recipients at risk for CMV (D+/R-, D+/R+, D-/R+) were randomized to prophylaxis (valganciclovir 900 mg q.d. for 100 days, n=49) or preemptive therapy (900 mg b.i.d. for 21 days, n=49) for CMV DNAemia (CMV DNA level>2000 copies/mL in >or=1 whole blood specimens by quantitative PCR) assessed weekly for 16 weeks and at 5, 6, 9 and 12 months. More patients in the preemptive group, 29 (59%) than in the prophylaxis group, 14 (29%) developed CMV DNAemia, p=0.004. Late onset of CMV DNAemia (>100 days after transplant) occurred in 11 (24%) randomized to prophylaxis, and none randomized to preemptive therapy. Symptomatic infection occurred in five patients, four (3 D+/R- and 1 D+/R+) in the prophylactic group and one (D+/R-) in the preemptive group. Peak CMV levels were highest in the D+/R- patients. Both strategies were effective in preventing symptomatic CMV. Overall costs were similar and insensitive to wide fluctuations in costs of either monitoring or drug.     

Cytomegalovirus transmission in mismatched solid organ transplant recipients: Are factors other than anti-viral prophylaxis at play?

Although antiviral prophylaxis has reduced cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNAemia and disease in seronegative solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients (R-) receiving seropositive donor organs (D+), its impact on CMV transmission is uncertain. Transmission, defined as CMV antigenemia/CMV DNAemia and/or seroconversion by year 2, and associated demographic risk factors were studied retrospectively in 428 D+/R- and 429 D-/R- patients receiving a SOT at our center. The cumulative transmission incidence was higher for lung (90.5%) and liver recipients (85.1%) than heart (72.7%), kidney (63.9%), and pancreas (56.2%) recipients (p < .001) and was significantly lower in living (50.1%) versus deceased donor (77.4%, p < .001) kidney recipients despite identical antiviral prophylaxis. In multivariate analysis, only allograft type predicted transmission risk (HR [CI] lung 1.609 [1.159, 2.234] and liver 1.644 [1.209, 2.234] vs kidney). For 53 D+ donating to >1 R- with adequate follow-up, 43 transmitted to all, three transmitted to none, and seven transmitted inconsistently with lungs and livers always transmitting but donor-matched heart, kidney or kidney-pancreas allografts sometimes not. Kidney pairs transmitted concordantly. CMV transmission risk is allograft-specific and unchanged despite antiviral prophylaxis. Tracking transmission and defining donor factors associated with transmission escape may provide novel opportunities for more targeted CMV prevention and improve outcome analysis in antiviral and vaccine trials.     

肾移植术后巨细胞病毒感染的选择性防治方案

目的 探讨根据受者风险状态采取预先治疗策略防治肾移植术后巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染的有效性和安全性.方法 60例肾移植患者随机分为普遍预防治疗组(普遍预防组)和预先控制治疗组(预先控制组),每组30例.两组肾移植术后均接受14 d的基础治疗(静脉滴注更昔洛韦250 mg/d),随后普遍预防组继续口服更昔洛韦,至术后90 d;预先控制组中的高危患者继续口服更昔洛韦,直至术后90 d,中危患者中仅CMV pp65抗原阳性者静脉滴注更昔洛韦,至CMV pp65抗原转阴后停药,低危患者在基础治疗后不再使用更昔洛韦.研究期为6个月,期间监测两组患者的CMV pp65抗原和CMV DNA,以及血常规、尿常规、肝功能、肾功能和排斥反应发生情况.结果 普遍预防组13例(43.3%,13/30)出现抗原血症,有5例(16.7%,5/30)的CMV DNA载量持续升高,其中1例(3.3%,1/30)发展成为CMV病.预先控制组14例(46.7%,14/30)出现抗原血症,有4例(13.3%,4/30)的CMV DNA载量持续升高,其中2例(6.7%,2/30)发展为CMV病.普遍预防组和预先控制组急性排斥反应发生率分别为16.7%(5/30)和6.7%(2/30);其它感染总的发生率分别为16.7%(5/30)和20%(6/30).两个组6个月时的人、肾存活率均为100%,其血肌酐的差异也无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 根据受者风险状态采取预先治疗策略能有效防治肾移植术后CMV感染,其效果与普遍预防策略相当.     

CMV infections after two doses of daclizumab versus thymoglobulin in renal transplant patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil, steroids and delayed cyclosporine A.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a major complication after renal transplantation and is involved in graft rejection. The anti-interleukin-2-receptor antibody daclizumab reduces the incidence of acute rejection without increasing the incidence of CMV infection. METHODS: This multicentre, randomized trial compared safety and efficacy, at 1 year, of two doses of daclizumab (54 patients, group D) with thymoglobulin (55 patients, group T) plus delayed cyclosporine (CsA), MMF (mycophenolate mofetil) and steroids in first cadaver kidney transplant patients. Primary criterion was CMV infection/syndrome/disease. D+/R- patients received oral ganciclovir prophylaxis for 90 days. RESULTS: Status for CMV was identical in the both groups. The incidence of CMV infection/syndrome/disease was 39% in group D versus 51% in group T (NS). Time to onset of CMV replication was delayed in group D (P = 0.015) and mean number of pp65-positive cells was lower at 4 and 6 months (P < 0.001). Incidence of symptomatic CMV episodes was not reduced in whole group D (5.6% versus 16.4%, NS), but lower in D+/R+ and D-/R+ patients without chemoprophylaxis, compared to group T (2.8% versus 21.6%, P = 0.028). Patient and graft survivals and incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection were identical. CONCLUSIONS: Limited dosing regimen of daclizumab with MMF, steroids and delayed CsA introduction was safe and effective. The incidence of CMV infection was not significantly different, but without chemoprophylaxis, clinical manifestations and viral replication were reduced with this regimen.