Outcomes of pregabalin in lumbar-disease patients with depression

Background

The anti-seizure drug pregabalin is currently used for peripheral neuropathic pain, including degenerative lumbar disease with a neuropathic component. Although there are many reports associated with pregabalin, treatment outcome in low back pain (LBP) patients with depression remains uncertain. This study investigated the outcomes of pregabalin in LBP patients with depression.

Methods

We assessed 64 patients (29 men and 35 women) using a Visual Analogue Scale, a Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Mean age was 63.3 years (range 20–81), and mean duration of disease was 69.8 months (range 3–576). The patients were divided into two groups according to SDS: normal (n = 37) and depressed group (n = 27).

Results

Pregabalin significantly reduced both SDS and ODI in the depressed group (p < 0.05). Effect size was larger for both SDS and ODI in the depressed group than in the normal group. Pain was significantly relieved, even in the depressed group (p < 0.01). Pain reduction was achieved by the direct effect of pregabalin, as well as indirect effects attributed to change in depressive symptoms. Although both somnolence and dizziness were detected, the use of hypnotic agents was decreased in half of cases. Somnolence did not influence the analgesic effects of the drug or psychotic state.

Conclusions

This investigation indicated that pregabalin is safe and effective for reducing both LBP and mood disturbance in patients with depression.     

Waist circumference is associated with locomotive syndrome in elderly females

Background

Central obesity has been proved to be a strong risk factor for numerous health-related problems as well as mortality. However, there have been no studies on the relationship between central obesity and locomotive syndrome (LS). The present study investigated the influence of central obesity on LS.

Methods

A total of 217 females between the ages of 60 and 79 years (mean 68.2 ± 5.0 years) who completed the questionnaires, physical examination and physical performance tests in the Yakumo study in 2011–2012 were enrolled in this study. Participants were assessed according to the 25-Question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS-25), visual analog scale (VAS) for lower back pain (LBP) and knee pain, and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ). LS was defined as having a score of >16 points on the GLFS-25. Height, weight, waist circumference (WC), hip circumference, % body fat and bone mineral density were measured. Body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio were calculated. The timed up-and-go test, one-leg standing time with eyes open, 10-m gait time and maximum stride were assessed. Back muscle strength and grip strength were measured. The relationships between obesity-related parameters and GLFS-25, RDQ, VAS and physical performance tests were analyzed.

Results

The GLFS-25, LBP and knee pain showed significant correlation with most of obesity-related parameters. Among obesity-related parameters, WC was most strongly related to the GLFS-25, LBP and knee pain. When participants were stratified by WC, larger WC was significantly associated with a higher GLFS-25 score, higher prevalence of LS and higher VAS for LBP and knee pain as well as poorer results in some physical performance tests even after adjustment by age.

Conclusions

The present study revealed that central obesity is significantly associated with LS, and WC can be a useful parameter to assess the risk of LS in elderly women.     

Validity of a single-item measure to assess leg or back pain as the predominant symptom in patients with degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine

Purpose

Recent studies suggest that the location of predominant pain (back or leg) can be a significant predictor of the outcome of surgery for degenerative spinal disorders. However, others challenge the notion that the predominant symptom can be reliably identified. This study examined the validity of a single item used to determine the most troublesome symptom.

Methods

A total of 2,778 patients with degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine scheduled for surgery with the goal of pain relief completed a questionnaire enquiring as to their most troublesome symptom [“main symptom”; back pain (BACK) or leg/buttock pain (LEG)]. They also completed separate 0–10 graphic rating scales for back pain (LBP) and leg/buttock pain (LP) intensity. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was used to determine the accuracy with which the “LP minus LBP” score was able to classify patients into their declared “main symptom” group. Sub-studies evaluated the test–retest reliability of the patients’ self-rated pain scores (N = 45) and the agreement between the main symptom declared by the patient in the questionnaire and that documented by the surgeon after the clinical consultation (N = 118).

Results

Test–retest reliability of the back and leg pain scores was good (ICC_2,1 of 0.8 for each), as was patient–surgeon agreement regarding the main symptom (BACK or LEG) (κ value 0.79). In the BACK group, the mean values for pain intensity were 7.3 ± 2.0 (LBP) and 5.2 ± 2.9 (LP); in the LEG group, they were 4.3 ± 2.9 (LBP) and 7.5 ± 1.9 (LP). The area under the curve for the ROC was 0.95 (95 % CI 0.94–0.95), indicating excellent discrimination between the BACK and LEG groups based on the “LP minus LBP” scores. A cutoff score >0.0 for “LP minus LBP” score gave optimal sensitivity and specificity for indicating membership of the LEG group (sensitivity 79.1 %, specificity 95.7 %).

Conclusions

The responses on the single item for the “main symptom” were in good agreement with the differential ratings on the 0–10 pain scales for LBP and LP intensity. The cutoff >0 for “LP minus LBP” for classifying patients as LEG pain predominant seemed appropriate and suggests good concurrent validity for the single-item measure. The single item may be of use in sub-grouping patients with the same disorder (e.g. spondylolisthesis) or as an indication in surgical decision-making.     

Effect of depression and neuropathic pain using questionnaires on quality of life in patients with low back pain; cross-sectional retrospective study

Purpose

The present study investigated the percentage of low back pain (LBP) patients who have depressive symptoms and neuropathic pain and analyzed the effects of these on the quality of life (QOL) in these patients.

Methods

Of the 650 new patients with LBP that visited the hospital between June 2012 and December 2013, 309 patients who completed questionnaires to assess LBP and QOL were included in the study. The questionnaire included demographic items, the self-rated depression scale (SDS)-Zung, the Japanese version of the PainDETECT questionnaire (PDQ-J), numerical pain rating scale (NRS), and QOL assessments. The patients were divided into two groups according to their SDS-Zung scores: a nondepressed group with SDS scores <40 and a depressed group with SDS-Zung scores ≥50.

Results

One hundred twenty-five patients (40.5 %) were classified as nondepressed and 63 (20.4 %) as depressed. The mean PDQ-J score was higher in depressed patients than in nondepressed patients. The frequency of neuropathic pain was greater in depressed patients, with neuropathic pain observed in 17 of the 63 (27 %) depressed LBP patients and 11 of the 125 (9 %) nondepressed LBP patients. The SDS-Zung and PDQ-J scores of LBP patients were correlated significantly (r = 0.261, p < 0.001). Depressed patients had higher pain NRS scores and lower QOL scores compared with nondepressed patients.

Conclusions

Both the depressed patients and those with neuropathic LBP had a higher level of pain, greater pain-related disability, and poorer QOL compared with nondepressed patients. This is the first study to use the SDS-Zung and PDQ-J screening questionnaires to estimate the presence of neuropathic pain associated with depressive symptoms in LBP patients and to evaluate the impact of these on QOL.

     

Prognosis of chronic low back pain in patients presenting to a private community-based group exercise program

Purpose

To examine the prognosis and prognostic factors for patients with chronic low back pain presenting to a private, community-based, group exercise program.

Methods

A total of 118 consecutive patients with chronic LBP were recruited. Baseline assessments included socio-demographic characteristics, back pain history and clinical examination findings. Primary outcome measures were pain intensity and disability at 3, 6 and 12 months. Potential prognostic factors to predict pain intensity and disability at 12 months were assessed using a multivariate regression model.

Results

112 (95 %) participants were followed up at 12 months. The majority of participants were female (73 %), had high educational levels (82 %) and resided in suburbs with a high socio-economic status (99 %). Pain intensity improved markedly during the first 6 months (35 %) with further minimal reductions up to 12 months (39 %). Interestingly, disability improved to a greater degree than pain (48 % improvement at 6 months) and continued to improve throughout the 12 months (60 %). Baseline pain intensity accounted for 10 % of the variance in the 1 year pain outcomes. Duration of current episode, baseline disability and educational level accounted for 15 % of the variation in disability at 12 months.

Conclusions

During a period of 12 months, patients with chronic LBP presenting to a private, community-based, group exercise program improved markedly, with greater improvements in disability than pain. The predictors investigated accounted for only 10 and 15 % of pain and disability outcomes, respectively.     

Evaluation of a new type of titanium mesh cage versus the traditional titanium mesh cage for single-level, anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion

Study design

A retrospective review of prospectively collected data in an academic institution.

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new type of titanium mesh cage (TMC) in single-level, anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF).

Methods

Fifty-eight patients consecutive with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) from cervical degenerative spondylosis and isolated ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament were treated with a single-level ACCF using either a new type of TMC (28 patients, group A) or the traditional TMC (30 patients, group B). We evaluated the patients for TMC subsidence, cervical lordosis (C2–C7 Cobb and Cobb of fused segments) and fusion status for a minimum of 30 months postoperatively based on spine radiographs. In addition, neurologic outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores. Neck pain was evaluated using a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS).

Results

The loss of height of the fused segments was less for group A than for group B (0.8 ± 0.3 vs. 2.8 ± 0.4 mm) (p < 0.01); also, there was a lower rate of severe subsidence (≥3 mm) in group A (4 %, 1/28) than in group B (17 %, 5/30) (p < 0.01). There were no differences in the C2–C7 Cobb and Cobb of fused segments between the groups preoperatively or at final follow-up (p > 0.05), but the Cobb of fused segments immediately postoperative were significantly less for group B than for group A (p < 0.01). All patients, however, had successful fusion (100 %, each). Both groups had marked improvement in the JOA score after operation (p < 0.01), with no significant differences in the JOA recovery ratio (p > 0.05). The postoperative VAS neck pain scores for group A were significantly less than that for group B (p < 0.05); severe subsidence was correlated with neck pain.

Conclusions

The new type of TMC provides comparable clinical results and fusion rates with the traditional TMC for patients undergoing single-level corpectomy. The new design TMC decreases postoperative subsidence (compared to the traditional TMC); the unique design of the new type of TMC matches the vertebral endplate morphology which appears to decrease the severity of subsidence-related neck pain in follow-up.     

A 5–22-year follow-up study of stemmed alumina ceramic total elbow arthroplasties with cement fixation for patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Background

We determined mid to long-term results of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) by use of unlinked elbow prostheses with solid alumina ceramic trochleae, and ceramic ulnar stems (stemmed Kyocera type I; SKC-I) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Patients and methods

Fifty-four elbows of 39 patients were available for detailed clinical and radiographic review after a follow-up period of at least 5 years. The mean follow-up period was 12.6 years (range 5–22 years). Clinical condition before and after surgery was assessed by use of a modified version of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS; 0–100 points) and a Japan Orthopaedic Association Elbow score (JOA score; 0–100 points). The radiographs were reviewed and loosening was defined as a progressive radiolucent line >1 mm wide that was completely circumferential around the prosthesis. Clinical records of post-operative events affecting the elbows were used for survival analysis of the prostheses using the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results

The average modified MEPS and JOA scores improved significantly from 39.7 ± 14.3 to 44.7 ± 9.4, respectively, pre-operatively, to 89.7 ± 15.4 and 83.1 ± 12.8, respectively, post-operatively (P < 0.0001). The functional assessment score also improved from 4.9 ± 2.8 to 8.5 ± 3.3 points (P < 0.0001). With loosening or implant revision defined as end points, the likelihood of survival of the prosthesis for up to 20 years was 92.6 % (95 % confidence interval (CI), 85.6–100.0) or 86.3 % (95 % CI 75.0–97.6), respectively.

Conclusion

Satisfactory clinical results were obtained after TEA using SKC-I prostheses, which provided excellent pain relief and functional range of motion. The results of our study reveal the high reliability over a long period of the cemented SKC-I prosthesis with an alumina ceramic component.     

Milde Ganzkörperhyperthermie in Kombination mit stationärer multimodal orientierter Schmerztherapie

Purpose

A randomized controlled clinical trial was implemented to evaluate the effectiveness of combined mild hyperthermia therapy (body core temperature 38.4?°C) and multimodal inpatient rehabilitation for patients suffering from chronic low back pain when compared to multimodal pain therapy alone.

Patients and methods

A total of 88 patients were randomly assigned to the combined or single therapeutic schemes according to a block randomization scheme. According to the trial inclusion criteria all patients suffered from chronic low back pain and showed morphological degeneration. All patients underwent a 12-day inpatient multimodal pain therapy, which was complemented with a 6-session schedule of mild hyperthermia therapy for the intervention group (1 h at 38.6?°C). On admission and 3 months after treatment the study patients were asked to complete an interview assessment with the Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire (Oswestry disability index). The change in the Oswestry disability index total score (%) 3 months after versus before therapy was defined as the primary clinical endpoint of the investigation. The patients in the control group and in the intervention group had a median age of 50 years. In the intervention group 70?% of the patients were female and 55?% reported having half to full time employment compared to 55 % and 43?% in the control group, respectively.

Results

On admission the control patients reported a median Oswestry disability index of 64?% and on recall the same of 64?%. The intervention group showed median Oswestry disability index estimates of 60 % and 66?%, respectively. The changes in the overall Oswestry disability index after 3 months differed significantly with an estimated 6?% for the intervention group versus 0?% for the control group (Wilcoxon p?=?0.050).

Conclusion

When combined with a multimodal inpatient lower back pain functional therapy in patients showing morphological degeneration, the mild hyperthermia therapy demonstrated statistically significant, although not clinically relevant benefits in comparison to the multimodal treatment alone. However, regarding the moderate overall patient-related benefits as measured in terms of the Oswestry disability index, the benefit of the underlying multimodal therapy concept implementation must be critically discussed irrespective of its combination with mild hyperthermia therapy.     

Can decompression surgery relieve low back pain in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis combined with degenerative lumbar scoliosis?

Introduction

Decompression with fusion is usually recommended in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) combined with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS). However, elderly patients with LSS and DLS often have other comorbidities, and surgical treatment must be both safe and effective. The aim of this study was to investigate whether decompression surgery alone alleviates low back pain (LBP) in patients with LSS and DLS, and to identify the predictors of postoperative residual LBP.

Materials and methods

A total of 75 patients (33 males and 42 females) with a mean age of 71.8 years (range 53–86 years) who underwent decompression surgery for LSS with DLS (Cobb angle ≥ 10°) and had a minimum follow-up period of 1 year, were retrospectively reviewed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system for the assessment of lumbar spinal diseases (JOA score). Radiographic measurements included coronal and sagittal Cobb angles, apical vertebral rotation (Nash-Moe method), and anteroposterior and lateral spondylolisthesis. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the predictors of residual LBP after surgery.

Results

Forty-nine patients had preoperative LBP, of which 29 (59.1 %) experienced postoperative relief of LBP. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the degree of apical vertebral rotation on preoperative radiography was significantly associated with postoperative residual LBP (odds ratio, 8.16, 95 % confidence interval, 1.55–83.81, p = 0.011).

Conclusion

A higher degree of apical vertebral rotation may therefore be an indicator of mechanical LBP in patients with LSS and DLS. Decompression with fusion should be recommended in these patients.     

Early neurological recovery course after surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective study with 2-year follow-up using three different functional assessment tests

Purpose

Though surgical decompression is today a common option for treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), little is known about the exact postoperative early neurological recovery course. The purpose of this study was to analyze the functional recovery, its dynamics, its intensity and its pattern, in the early postoperative period after surgical decompression for CSM.

Methods

A prospective non-controlled observational study was performed from March 2006 to July 2008, and included consecutive patients with CSM who underwent surgical decompression. Functional assessments were done before the operation, at 1 month, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after surgery using three tests: the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) test, the nine-hole peg test (9HPT) and the Crockard walking test.

Results

Sixty-seven patients were included (mean age of 61 years). The global JOA score improved after surgery, reaching statistical significance at 1 month (from 11.5 ± 2.6 to 13.6 ± 2.0 points, p = 0.0078), then settling to a plateau till the end of follow-up at 24 months (12.7 ± 2.6 points). The 9HPT and the Crockard test did not show any significant improvement after surgery.

Conclusions

Neurological recovery after surgical decompression has been proved to be very fast during the first month, but stabilizes afterwards. The JOA score is the best assessment to reveal neurological improvement in the early recovery course.     

Validation of the Simplified Chinese version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI)

Purpose

To translate the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) into Simplified Chinese and then validate it for Mainland Chinese patients with low back pain (LBP).

Methods

A total of 120 consecutive patients with LBP >3 months who visited our outpatient clinic from December 2011 to March 2012 were asked to complete a questionnaire booklet including the following: (1) the Roland Morris disability questionnaire (RMQ) (Fan et al. in Spine 37(10):875–880, 2012), (2) the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) (Zhang et al. in Int J Med Sci 9(7):521–526, 2012), (3) the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (Liu et al. in Spine 34(11):1211–1216, 2009), (4) visual analogue scale (VAS) measure of pain, and (5) COMI. These patients were also asked to complete a second COMI questionnaire and a transition questionnaire (5-point Likert scale: better, a little better, no change, a little worse, worse) and to return the second COMI questionnaire via mail within 1 month.

Results

The floor effects for the COMI items ranged from 5.8 to 12.5 %. High values (28.3, 27.5, and 25.8 %, respectively) were found for symptom-specific quality of life, social disability, and work disability. Regarding the ceiling effects, the social and work disabilities were relatively high at 17.5 and 24.2 %, respectively. For other items, the values ranged from 0 to 14.2 %. Neither floor nor ceiling effects were found for the COMI summary score. Excellent correlations were found between the COMI pain scores and VAS scores (Rho = 0.89) and between the COMI pain and the SF-36 bodily pain domain (Rho = 0.84). Other individual items and summary scores showed a very good correlation (Rho = 0.54–0.72) with the corresponding questionnaires except for “symptom-specific well-being” (0.31–0.45). One-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to determine the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The ICC for the entire COMI score was 0.91 (95 % CI 0.85–0.94) and 0.81–0.86 for the two pain scores (back and leg). The “minimum detectable change’’ (MDC 95 %) for the COMI summary score was 1.91 points. No significant difference in the mean values was found for the repeated scores of individual items or the summary score.

Conclusion

The Simplified Chinese version of COMI showed satisfactory reliability and good psychometric properties. This concise questionnaire is suitable for widespread use in Mainland China.     

A prospective,cluster-randomized controlled trial of exercise program to prevent low back pain in office workers

Purpose

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of an exercise program focusing on muscle stretching and endurance training on the 12-month incidence of low back pain (LBP) in office workers.

Methods

A 12-month prospective cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted in healthy office workers with lower-than-normal trunk extension flexibility or trunk muscle endurance. Healthy office workers (n = 563) were randomly assigned at the cluster level into either intervention (n = 282) or control (n = 281) groups. Participants in the intervention group received an exercise program that included daily stretching exercise and twice-a-week muscle endurance training. Those in the control group received no intervention. The 12-month incidence of LBP was the primary outcome. Secondary outcome were pain intensity, disability level, and quality of life and health status. Analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazard models.

Results

Over the 12-month follow-up, 8.8 % of participants in the intervention group and 19.7 % in the control group developed incidence of LBP. Hazard rate ratios showed a protective effect of the exercise program for LBP (HR = 0.37, 95 % CI 0.22–0.64) after adjusting for biopsychosocial factors. There was no significant difference in pain intensity, disability, and quality of life and health status between those who reported incidence of LBP in the intervention and control groups.

Conclusion

An exercise program consisting of muscle stretching and endurance training is an effective intervention to reduce incident LBP for office workers with lower-than-normal trunk extension flexibility or trunk muscle endurance.     

Correlation of low back pain caused by lumbar spinal stenosis and depression in women: a clinical study

Objective:

Low back pain (LBP) due to spinal stenosis may be one of the most debilitating symptoms to decrease the quality of life. The cause and effect association of LBP and depression is vague. Pain may also be a somatization symptom of depression. This is more frequent in the female population. This clinical study was designed to evaluate the correlation between the level of back pain caused by lumbar spinal stenosis and depression in the female population.

Method:

The study included 50 consecutive female patients with spinal stenosis. The stenosis diagnosis is made by neurological examination and neuro-imaging. The study group was psychiatrically evaluated and grouped as those with and without depression. Visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI) and Hamilton Depression Scale (HDS) were utilized in initial evaluation of the group.

Results:

Twenty-one patients with lumbar spinal stenosis had depression (DLS Group) and 29 did not (LSS Group). Mean HDS scores were 8.97 and 32.48 for Group LSS and Group DLS, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the VAS scores of the groups (the mean VAS scores were 5.6 and 7.6, for groups LSS and DLS, respectively). The mean ODI values for LSS (65.24?±?4.58) and DLS (75.1?±?6.7) groups were also significantly different. In Group DLS, there were positive correlations between ODI and VAS with HDS (p?Conclusion: Our findings indicated a relationship between lumbar spinal stenosis associated pain levels and depression. However, the cause and result relationship still needs to be established yet.     

Low back pain does not improve with surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse

Introduction and hypothesis

Our goal was to determine if there is a correlation between low back pain (LBP) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) by assessing for change in LBP after surgical correction of prolapse.

Methods

Patients undergoing POP surgery were recruited to participate. They completed the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), a validated back pain questionnaire, at their preoperative and postoperative visits at 1, 3, and 6 months. A higher ODI score (0–100) represents more severe disability. A 9-point change represents a minimal clinically important difference (MCID). The primary outcome was the change in ODI scores from preoperative to 3 months postoperative. We analyzed ODI scores with repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Power analysis showed that a sample size of 50 was needed for 88 % power to resolve a MCID on ODI.

Results

A total of 51 patients were recruited and 43 (84 %), 34 (67 %), and 36 (71 %) completed the 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up, respectively. The mean ODI scores at the preoperative and the 1-, 3-, and 6-month postoperative visits were 15, 19, 9, and 9. The mean ODI score from preoperative to 3 months postoperative improved by 5 points [confidence interval (CI) ?9.2 to ?0.5, p?=?0.03]. Of the participants 7 (20.6 %, CI 11–35 %) experienced a MCID improvement, 24 (70.6 %, CI 56–83 %) reported no substantial change, and 3 (8.8 %, CI 3–20 %) experienced a MCID worsening.

Conclusions

Our study found a statistically significant but not clinically significant improvement of LBP after surgical repair of prolapse.     

Clinical outcomes following sublaminar-trimming laminoplasty for extensive lumbar canal stenosis

Purpose

Current surgical approaches for treatment of lumbar canal stenosis are often associated with relatively high rates of reoperation and recurrent stenosis. We have developed a new approach for treatment of this condition: sublaminar-trimming laminoplasty. To describe the surgical approach of sublaminar-trimming laminoplasty and to assess associated outcomes.

Methods

Patients with extensive lumbar canal stenosis who received sublaminar-trimming laminoplasty from 2006 to 2008 were considered for inclusion in the study. The surgery comprised aspects of laminotomy and laminectomy. The following were assessed before surgery and 3 years after surgery: leg and back pain by visual analog scale (VAS), extent of disability by Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), severity of back pain by Japanese Orthopedic Association Score for Back Pain (JOA), walking tolerance, and leg numbness. Complications were noted.

Results

A total of 49 patients were included in the study (mean age 65.6 ± 10.6 years). VAS leg and back pain, ODI, and JOA scores significantly changed from before surgery to 3 years after surgery (P < 0.001). Mean changes (95 % confidence interval) were ?6.2 (?6.7, ?5.7), ?4.3 (?4.8, ?3.8), ?21.4 (?23.4, ?19.5), and 13.4 (12.1, 14.7) for leg pain, back pain, ODI, and JOA scores, respectively. Patients experienced significant improvements in walking tolerance and leg numbness (P < 0.001). There were no instances of recurrent stenosis or postoperative spinal instability. Complications included intraoperative dural tear (n = 2), postoperative urinary tract infection (n = 2), and inadequate decompression and junctional stenosis during follow-up (both n = 1).

Conclusion

Sublaminar-trimming laminoplasty shows promise as an effective treatment for extensive lumbar canal stenosis.     

Clinical outcomes of two minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for lumbar degenerative diseases

Background

There are two modified TLIF, including MIS-TLIF and TLIF through Wiltse approach (W-TLIF). Although both of the two minimally invasive surgical procedures can be effective in the treatment for lumbar degenerative diseases, no comparative analysis has been made so far regarding their clinical outcomes.

Objective

To compare the clinical outcomes of MIS-TLIF and W-TLIF for the treatment for single-segment degenerative lumbar diseases.

Methods

Ninety-seven patients with single-segment degenerative lumbar disorders were included in this study. Forty-seven underwent MIS-TLIF surgery (group A). For group B, fifty patients underwent W-TLIF. The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, the visual analog scale (VAS) of low back pain (LBP) and leg pain, MRI score and atrophy rate of CSA, interbody fusion rate were assessed during the postoperative follow-up.

Results

Incision length, blood loss, operative time, CPK, and postoperative incision pain VAS were better in group A (P < 0.05). The seconds of intraoperative fluoroscopy in groups A and B were 76 ± 9 and 7 ± 2, respectively (P < 0.05). In group B, The blood loss and CPK at L5-S1 were significantly higher than those at L4-5. Postoperative JOA scores, VAS of leg pain, and fusion rate were statistically the same between the two groups. VAS of LBP, MRI score, and atrophy rate of CSA was better in group A than in group B (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Both methods are effective in the treatment for lumbar degenerative disease. MIS-TLIF has less blood loss, shorter surgical incision, and less lower postoperative back pain, while W-TLIF is less expensive for hospital stay with lower exposure to X-rays.

     

A predictive model for disability in patients with lumbar disc herniation

Background

Lumbar disc herniation may influence patients’ daily activities and social interactions; however, no predictive models of disability could be found for patients with lumbar disc herniation. We aimed to explore predictive factors for disability in patients with lumbar disc herniation.

Methods

The sample included 216 patients recruited from the orthopedic outpatient clinics at a medical center in northern Taiwan. Data were collected on patients’ pain, fatigue, depression, disability, and demographics. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis was used in model verification. Path analysis was used to investigate causal relationships between disability and other factors.

Results

In path analysis, the most influential factor affecting the disability level was the pain level (standardized regression coefficient, b = 0.746), followed by the fatigue level (b = 0.138) and depression level (b = 0.100). The depression level was directly affected by the fatigue level (b = 0.416) and the pain level (b = 0.367), the fatigue level was directly affected by the pain level (b = 0.538), and the pain level was directly affected by age (b = 0.140) and previous surgery (b = 0.260).

Conclusions

We recommend that health-care providers regularly assess and treat pain and depression to reduce/prevent disability among patients with lumbar disc herniation, even among those who are apparently functioning well in the community.     

Dose response and structural injury in the disability of spinal injury

Introduction

In traumatic injury there is a clear relationship between the dose of energy involved, structural tissue damage and resultant disability after recovery. This relationship is often absent in cases of non-specific chronic low back pain that is perceived by patients as attributed to a workplace injury. There are many studies assessing risk factors for non-specific low back pain. However, studies addressing causality of back pain are deficient.

Purpose

To establish whether there exists a causal relationship between structural injury, low back pain and spinal disability.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of prospectively gathered validated spinal outcome measures [Oswestry disability index (ODI), low back outcome score (LBO), modified somatic perception (MSP), modified Zung depression index (MZD)] between patients with healed high energy thoracolumbar spinal fractures and patients with self-perceived work-related low back pain. Causality was established according to two of Bradford Hill’s criteria of medical causality, temporal and dose–response relationships.

Results

Twenty-three patients with spinal fractures (group 1) of average age 44 years were compared to 19 patients with self-reported back pain in the workplace pursuing claims for compensation (group 2) of average age 48 years. Both groups were comparable in terms of age and sex. The average ODI in group 1 was 28 % (SD 19) compared to 42 % (SD 19) in group 2 (P < 0.05). Similarly, LBOS was 39.7 versus 24.3 (P < 0.05), MSP 4.3 versus 9.3 (P < 0.05) and MZD 20.2 versus 34.8 (P < 0.05) in groups 1 and 2, respectively.

Conclusion

Despite high-energy trauma and significant structural damage to the spine, patients with the high energy injuries had better spinal outcome scores in all measures. There is no ‘dose–response’ relationship between structural injury, low back pain and spinal disability. This is the reverse of what would be anticipated if structural injury was the cause of disability in workplace reported onset of low back pain.     

Improvement in low back pain following spinal decompression: observational study of 119 patients

Study design

Prospective clinical observational study of low back pain (LBP) in patients undergoing laminectomy or laminotomy surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

Objectives

To quantify any change in LBP following laminectomy or laminotomy spinal decompression surgery.

Patients and methods

119 patients with LSS completed Oswestry Disability Index questionnaire (ODI) and Visual Analogue Scale for back and leg pain, preoperatively, 6 weeks and 1 year postoperatively.

Results

There was significant (p < 0.0001) reduction in mean LBP from a baseline of 5.14/10 to 3.03/10 at 6 weeks. Similar results were seen at 1 year where mean LBP score was 3.07/10. There was a significant (p < 0.0001) reduction in the mean ODI at 6 weeks and 1 year postoperatively. Mean ODI fell from 44.82 to 25.13 at 6 weeks and 28.39 at 1 year.

Conclusion

The aim of surgery in patients with LSS is to improve the resulting symptoms that include radicular leg pain and claudication. This observational study reports statistically significant improvement of LBP after LSS surgery. This provides frequency distribution data, which can be used to inform prospective patients of the expected outcomes of such surgery.     

Prevalence of low back pain and factors associated with chronic disabling back pain in Japan

Purpose

This study aimed to report lifetime and 4-week low back pain (LBP) prevalence and examine factors associated with chronic LBP and back pain disability over a lifetime in a Japanese adult population.

Methods

In February 2011, 1,063,083 adults aged 20–79 years registered as internet research volunteers were randomly selected to participate in a questionnaire survey. The data from 65,496 respondents were analyzed to calculate age-standardized lifetime and 4-week prevalence. Chronic LBP and back pain disability were defined as LBP lasting for ≥3 months and a consecutive ≥4-day-long absence, respectively. Factors associated with chronic disabling back pain over a lifetime were examined by multiple logistic regression modeling.

Results

The lifetime LBP prevalence was 83 % and 4-week prevalence was 36 %; majority of the respondents had disability-free LBP. Smoking [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.17; 95 % CI: 1.05, 1.30], lower educational level (aOR: 1.21; 95 % CI: 1.09, 1.34), history of disabling back pain among family members and/or significant others (aOR: 1.46; 95 % CI: 1.27, 1.67), occupational LBP (aOR: 1.34; 95 % CI: 1.16, 1.55), traffic injury (aOR: 2.81; 95 % CI: 2.07, 3.81), compensated work injury (aOR: 2.42; 95 % CI: 1.92, 3.05), radiating pain (aOR: 4.94; 95 % CI: 4.45, 5.48), low back surgery (aOR: 10.69; 95 % CI: 9.02, 12.68), and advice to rest upon back pain consultation (aOR: 3.84; 95 % CI: 3.36, 4.40) were associated with chronic disabling back pain over a lifetime.

Conclusions

LBP is common in Japan as in other industrialized countries. The association between the advice to rest and chronic disabling back pain supports recent treatment guidelines emphasizing continuation of daily activities.