Combined epidural-spinal opioid-free anaesthesia and analgesia for hysterectomy

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are major problems after gynaecological surgery. We studied 40 patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy, allocated randomly to receive opioid-free epidural-spinal anaesthesia or general anaesthesia with continuous epidural bupivacaine 15 mg h-1 or continuous bupivacaine 10 mg h-1 with epidural morphine 0.2 mg h-1, respectively, for postoperative analgesia. Nausea, vomiting, pain and bowel function were scored on 4- point scales for 3 days. Patients undergoing general anaesthesia had significantly higher nausea and vomiting scores (P < 0.01) but significantly lower pain scores during rest (P < 0.05) and mobilization (P < 0.01). More patients undergoing general anaesthesia received antiemetics (13 vs five; P < 0.05), but fewer received supplementary opioids on the ward (eight vs 16; P < 0.05). We conclude that opioid- free epidural-spinal anaesthesia for hysterectomy caused less PONV, but with less effective analgesia compared with general anaesthesia with postoperative continuous epidural morphine and bupivacaine.      

Effects of epidural administration of local anaesthetics or morphine on postoperative nitrogen loss and catabolic hormones

To examine the effects of postoperative epidural analgesia with local anaesthetics or morphine on the excess nitrogen loss after upper abdominal surgery and to assess the roles of catabolic hormones in the nitrogen loss, urinary excretion of nitrogen and catecholamines and plasma concentrations of cortisol and glucagon were measured in three groups of patients undergoing elective gastrectomy. Group G patients received the operation under general anaesthesia, and their postoperative pain was relieved by intermittent injections of analgesics. Group PE received prolonged epidural analgesia with local anaesthetics during and after surgery. Group EM received epidural analgesia intra-operatively and epidural morphine postoperatively. Urinary nitrogen excretion during the first three postoperative days was significantly less in the PE and EM groups than in the G group, and the PE group excreted slightly less nitrogen than the EM group. In the G group, urinary excretion of adrenaline increased mainly on the day of operation, and noradrenaline chiefly on postoperative days. These catecholamine responses were almost completely abolished in the PE group, and significantly inhibited in the EM group. Plasma cortisol response was most remarkable shortly after the operation and then decreased in all groups, but was significantly lower in the two epidural groups than in the G group throughout the study. Plasma glucagon increased postoperatively in all groups, and the increase was less pronounced in both epidural groups than in the G group. These results suggested that an elevated sympathetic activity, represented by increased noradrenaline excretion and elicited by painful nociceptive and sympathetic nervous afferents, is responsible for the postoperative nitrogen loss which is mediated by glucagon and cortisol.     

Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia do not affect energy expenditure after major abdominal surgery

Our objective was to determine the effect of perioperative epidural anaesthesia and analgesia on the increase in energy expenditure which accompanies major elective abdominal surgery in a prospective, randomized study. Eight patients undergoing elective resections of the colon and/or rectum received general anaesthesia alone (nitrous oxide, oxygen, and isoflurane, supplemented with intravenous fentanyl to a maximum of 10 μg · kg^?1), and 12 patients received perioperative epidural anaesthesia and analgesia using lidocaine (carbonated lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 1:200,000, 20 ml over 30 min) and morphine (preservative-free morphine 0.10 mg · kg^?1 after catheter insertion and 0.05 to 0.10 mg · kg^?1 every 12 hr as needed until the morning following surgery) via a lower lumbar catheter in addition to general anaesthesia. Respiratory gas exchange was measured using a metabolic cart and canopy system early on the morning of surgery, six hours postoperatively, and on the first and second postoperative mornings. Parenteral analgesic administration (P < 0.001) and visual analogue pain scores (P < 0.05) were lower in the patients receiving epidural anaesthesia and time to first parenteral analgesia was longer (P< 0.005). Oxygen consumption, carbon dioxide production, and energy expenditure increased after surgery (all P < 0.001) but were very similar in the two groups (all P ≥ 0.8) before and after surgery. Despite substantial effects on postoperative pain, we conclude that oxygen consumption and energy expenditure following major abdominal surgery are not diminished by perioperative epidural anaesthesia and analgesia.     

Epidural analgesia attenuates the systemic stress response to upper abdominal surgery: a randomized trial

The effects of combined general anaesthesia and epidural analgesia in various endocrine and metabolic parameters were studied before, during, at the end, and 72 h after upper abdominal surgery, in an effort to further elucidate the role of epidural analgesia in the endocrine and metabolic response. 50 patients were randomly assigned into groups A and B, which received general anaesthesia alone and combined general anaesthesia and epidural analgesia, respectively. The effects of surgical stress in the plasma concentration of ACTH (P <0.001), cortisol (P <0.01), aldosterone (P <0.05), FFA (P <0.05) and glucose (P <0.01) were significantly less pronounced in the group of patients who received combined general anaesthesia and epidural analgesia. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in regard with plasma TSH, T3, T4, glucagon or Na+ concentration. These results indicate that the combination of general anaesthesia and epidural analgesia attenuate, but does not inhibit, the endocrine and metabolic response to upper abdominal surgery.     

Effect of piroxicam in addition to continuous thoracic epidural bupivacaine and morphine on postoperative pain and lung function after thoracotomy

Twenty-eight patients scheduled for lung resection with lateral thoracotomy and postoperative chest drains during combined thoracic epidural bupivacaine plus morphine and general anaesthesia were studied. Postoperative pain treatment was continuous epidural infusion of bupivacaine 0.25% 5 ml h-1 plus morphine 0.2 mg h-1 for 48 h and, in addition, the patients received rectal piroxicam 40 mg randomly and double-blind 12 h and 1 h before surgery and 20 mg 24 h-1 postoperatively or placebo. Pain was evaluated at rest, during cough and mobilisation, together with pulmonary function (FEV1, FVC, PEFR) and sensory level of analgesia repeatedly for 48 h. The results showed efficient pain relief, but without differences in pain scores or need for supplementary analgesics between the two groups. Pulmonary function decreased similarly in the two groups. Thus we were unable to show enhanced analgesia by supplementing an otherwise effective low-dose epidural bupivacaine and morphine treatment with piroxicam after thoracic surgery with chest drains.     

Thoracic epidural anaesthesia for coronary artery bypass graft surgeryEffects on postoperative complications

We have performed a retrospective analysis of the peri-operative course of 218 consecutive patients who underwent routine coronary artery bypass graft surgery in this institution. All patients received a standardised general anaesthetic using target-controlled infusions of alfentanil and propofol. One hundred patients also received thoracic epidural anaesthesia with bupivacaine and clonidine, started before surgery and continued for 5 days after surgery. The remaining 118 patients received target-controlled infusion of alfentanil for analgesia for the first 24 h after surgery, followed by intravenous patient-controlled morphine analgesia for a further 48 h. Using computerised patient medical records, we analysed the frequency of respiratory, neurological, renal, gastrointestinal, haematological and cardiovascular complications in these two groups. New arrhythmias requiring treatment occurred in 18% of the thoracic epidural anaesthesia group of patients compared with 32% of the general anaesthesia group (p = 0.02). There was also a trend towards a reduced incidence of respiratory complications in the thoracic epidural anaesthesia group. The time to tracheal extubation was decreased in the epidural group, with the tracheas of 21% of the patients being extubated immediately after surgery compared with 2% in the general anaesthesia group (p < 0.001). There were no serious neurological problems resulting from the use of thoracic epidural analgesia.     

Pre-emptive analgesia with ketamine, morphine and epidural lidocaine prior to total knee replacement

Purpose

Pre-emptive analgesia can improve postoperative pain management. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of ketamine as a pre-emptive analgesic as previous studies have shown the involvement of N-methyl-D-Aspartate (NMDA) receptor in neuroplasticity.

Methods

Forty-five ASA 1–2 patients, undergoing unilateral total knee replacement were studied. In the study groups, epidural lidocaine was used as the primary anaesthestic. Patients received ketamine + morphine epidurally 30 min either before (group EB) or after skin incision (group EA). Group G patients received general anaesthesia and ketamine + morphine were given 30 min after skin incision via an epidural catheter used for postoperative pain control. Epidural morphine and ketamine in lidocaine was given to all patients at the end of surgery and every 12 hr for three days for analgesia supplemented with PCA morphine. The time until first PCA trigger, morphine consumption, pain scores, satisfaction scores, and morphine related side effects were recorded at 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hr after surgery.

Results

Epidural ketamine plus morphine with lidocaine before surgical incision produced better pain relief and patient satisfaction than when given after incision. A longer time to PCA and decreased morphine consumption were observed in group EB than in group G. In group EA, epidural anaesthesia also produced some pre-emptive analgesic effect compared with general anaesthesia shown by decreased morphine consumption.

Conclusions

Administration of ketamine plus morphine with epidural lidocaine anaesthesia before surgery provided improved postoperative analgesia compared with general anaesthesia alone or when analgesics were given after skin incision.     

A comparison of the effects on postoperative pain relief of epidural analgesia started before or after surgery

In a randomized, prospective clinical study pain relief and pulmonary function were compared after upper abdominal surgery when thoracic epidural analgesia was instituted either before or after surgery. Twenty-six patients admitted for surgery to treat gastro-oesophageal reflux received thoracic epidural analgesia as an adjunct to general anaesthesia either before or after surgery. Twelve patients received epidural mepivacaine 20 mg mL(-1) and morphine perioperatively. Another 14 patients received an epidural bolus of bupivacaine 2.5 mg mL(-1) and morphine after skin closure. Bupivacaine 2.5 mg mL(-1) with morphine was adminstered to all patients for three postoperative days. No intergroup differences were found regarding pain at rest and mobilization. The requirement for additional analgesics was similar in both groups as well as peak expiratory flow. Thoracic epidural analgesia that had already been induced before surgery, and was continued into the postoperative period, does not seem to add any advantage regarding pain relief and lung function compared with thoracic epidural analgesia instituted in the immediate postoperative period.     

A comparative study of patient-controlled epidural fentanyl and single dose epidural morphine for post-caesarean analgesia

In a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study, 23 patients who had undergone Caesarean delivery under epidural anaesthesia were assessed to evaluate the effectiveness of patientcontrolled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with fentanyl compared with a single dose of epidural morphine for postoperative analgesia. Group A (n = 11) received epidural fentanyl 100 μg intraoperatively, then self-administered a maximum of two epidural fentanyl boluses 50 μg (10 μg · ml^?1) with a lockout period of five minutes for a maximum of two doses per hour. Group B (n = 11) received a single bolus of epidural morphine 3 mg (0.5 mg · ml^?1) intraoperatively and received the same instructions as Group A but had their PCA devices filled with 0.9% NaCl. Patients were assessed up to 24 hr for pain, satisfaction with pain relief, nausea and pruritus using visual analogue scales (VAS). The treatments for inadequate analgesia, nausea and pruritus as well as time to first independent ambulation were recorded. The ventilatory response to carbon dioxide challenge was measured at four and eight hours. Pain relief, satisfaction with pain relief, and the use of supplemental analgesics were similar in both groups. The mean 24 hr dose of epidural fentanyl used by group A patients was 680 μg. Pruritus was less common in Group A patients at the 8 and 24 hr observation periods (P < 0.0125). Both groups experienced the same degree of nausea and clinically unimportant respiratory depression. We conclude that PCEA with fentanyl provides analgesia equal to a single dose of epidural morphine and may be suitable for patients who have experienced considerable pruritus after epidural morphine adminstration.     

Epidural analgesia with 4 mg of morphine after caesarean section: modulating effect of epidural block compared to general anaesthesia

Forty patients had epidural catheters placed for analgesia in active labour. For caesarean section patients in the epidural (EA) group (n = 20) had epidural anaesthesia with 0.5% bupivacaine supplemented if necessary with 2% lidocaine with adrenaline. Patients in the general anaesthesia (GA) group (n = 20) had standardized general anaesthesia for surgery. In both groups 4 mg of morphine in 8 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was given epidurally after delivery of the baby. During the first 3 h of the postoperative period, as long as the epidural block was effective, patients in the EA group experienced significantly less pain. At 6, 12 and 24 h pain estimations were equal in both groups. Patients in the EA group consumed significantly less pain medication during the first 24 h after surgery (P = 0.0002). Itching was less frequent in the GA group (P = 0.011). It is concluded that epidural administration of 4 mg of morphine produces more effective postoperative pain relief when emergency caesarean section is conducted under epidural than when it is conducted under general anaesthesia.     

Postoperative analgesia with epidural morphine after hip operations (author's transl)

80 patients undergoing hip surgery under lumbar epidural block have been studied (double blind) for postoperative analgesia. There were 4 groups, of 20 patients each, who received a single epidural injection of 0 mg, 2 mg or 4 mg morphine in 1 ml of saline added to 6 ml bupivacaine 0.5% or 4 mg morphine in 6 ml saline. In the morphine groups analgesia lasted between 37 and 50 hours. No neurological side-effects or severe respiratory depression have was observed; but a significant rise of paCO2 was found. Other side-effects were nausea/vomiting and the need for catheterisation in about 50% of patients. We conclude, that the indications for epidural analgesia with morphine have to be chosen carefully.     

Pre-incisional epidural ketamine, morphine and bupivacaine combined with epidural and general anaesthesia provides pre-emptive analgesia for upper abdominal surgery

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that N-methyl-D-asparate (NMDA) receptor antagonists provide a pre-emptive analgesic effect in humans. This study investigated the benefits of pre-emptive analgesia for upper abdominal surgery, using pre-incisional epidural ketamine + morphine + bupivacaine (K+M+B) treatment for achieving postoperative pain relief. METHODS: Sixty ASA 1-2 patients scheduled for upper abdominal surgery were allocated to three groups in a randomized, single-blinded study. Patients in the control group (I) received general anaesthesia followed by an infusion of normal saline. Group II and III patients received general anaesthesia with a continuous epidural infusion of 2% lidocaine. Thirty minutes after the incision in groups I and II, an epidural pain control regimen was administered using ketamine (10 mg) and morphine (1 mg) in 10 ml of 0.085% bupivacaine (K+M+B). Group III patients also received K+M+B, but it was administered 10 min after the 2% lidocaine injection and 30 min before skin incision. All patients received an epidural pain control regimen (q12 h) for 3 days after their first injection. Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine was used to control subsequent postoperative pain. During the 3-day period following surgery, duration to PCA trigger (h), morphine consumption (mg), pain intensity at rest and when coughing/moving, and analgesic-related adverse effects were recorded. The VAS scale (0-10) was used to assess pain intensity. RESULTS: Median times to first PCA trigger were 1.2 (0.5-2.0) h, 3.0 (0.7-4.2) h, and 4.0 (2.5-7.5) h for groups I, II, and III, respectively. Both the incident and resting pain scores were consistently lower for group III patients than groups I and II. The number of PCA triggers (all attempts/successful triggers) during the day following surgery were 14.0 (3-30)/8.0 (3-24) times, 10.0 (3-23)/6.0 (2-20) times, and 7.0 (3-12)/4.5 (1-10) times for groups I, II, and III. Total morphine consumption for the 3-day observation period was 12.5 (3-42) mg, 10.5 (2-29) mg, and 6.0 (1-20) for groups I, II, and III, respectively. CONCLUSION: Pre-incisional epidural K+M+B treatment combined with continuous epidural anaesthesia and general anaesthesia provides an ideal pre-emptive analgesic therapy, exhibiting better postoperative pain relief than general anaesthesia and post-incisional K+M+B treatment.     

Effects of epidural bupivacaine and epidural morphine on bowel function and pain after hysterectomy

A comparison was made of the effects of continuous epidural analgesia with bupivacaine and intermittent epidural morphine on bowel function after abdominal hysterectomy. The duration of postoperative ileus was assessed as the time from the end of operation to the first postoperative passage of flatus and feces. Twenty-two patients were randomly allocated to two equal groups. An "epidural morphine" group received general anesthesia and epidural morphine for postoperative pain relief, and an "epidural bupivacaine" group was given combined general anesthesia and epidural anesthesia with 0.5% bupivacaine intraoperatively and epidural analgesia with 0.25% bupivacaine postoperatively. Epidural morphine or bupivacaine was given for 42 h postoperatively. Pain intensity (visual analog scale) was low in both groups, but lower (P less than 0.05) in the epidural bupivacaine group. The time to first passage of flatus was 22 +/- 16 h in the epidural bupivacaine group and 56 +/- 22 h in the epidural morphine group (P less than 0.001). The time to first postoperative passage of feces was shorter (P less than 0.05) in the former than in the latter 57 +/- 44 h vs 92 +/- 22 h). The patients of the epidural bupivacaine group started intake of oral fluids earlier (P less than 0.01) and to a greater extent (P less than 0.05) than those in the epidural morphine group. It is concluded that the duration of postoperative ileus after hysterectomy is shorter when epidural bupivacaine is given for postoperative pain relief than when this is achieved by epidural morphine.     

Enhanced pain management for post-gastrectomy patients with combined epidural morphine and fentanyl

Purpose

To determine whether clinical advantages could be demonstrated by epidural fentanyl given in addition to epidural morphine for postgastrectomy analgesia.

Methods

One-hundred and twenty two patients undergoing elective gastrectomy were prospectively studied in a randomised, double-blind fashion. All patients received epidural lidocaine 1.5% with epinephrine (1:200,000) followed by light general anaesthesia for surgical anaesthesia. They were assigned to four groups according to the combinations of each epidural opioid: 2 mg morphine alone, 2 mg morphine + 100μg fentanyl, 4 mg morphine alone, and 4 mg morphine + 100 μg fentanyl. Morphine and fentanyl were given epidurally approximately 60 and 15 min, respectively, before the completion of surgery.

Results

Addition of epidural fentanyl to both doses of morphine not only decreased intensity of pain associated with coughing during the early postoperative period, but also prolonged the time until the first analgesic request at each morphine dose studied. Of the combination doses, 4 mg morphine + 100 μg fentanyl provided the longest time to the first request for analgesic, and was associated with least amount of postoperative analgesic supplement and best patient satisfaction without increasing incidence of side effects.

Conclusion

The addition of 100 μg fentanyl to 2 mg or 4 mg epidural morphine provides clinical advantages over morphine alone for post-gastrectomy analgesia.     

A Controlled Study on the Effect of Epidural Analgesia with Local Anaesthetics and Morphine on Morbidity after Abdominal Surgery

A hundred patients scheduled for elective abdominal surgery were randomized to either general anaesthesia (low-dose fentanyl) and systemic morphine for postoperative pain or combined general anaesthesia and epidural analgesia with etidocaine 1.5% intraoperatively (T4-S5) and bupivacaine 0.5% 5 ml/4 h for 24 h and morphine 4 mg/12 h for 72 h. Postoperative pain was better controlled by the epidural regimen (P less than 0.0001). We found no significant reduction in postoperative mortality (6% to 2%), pneumonia (28% to 20%), cardiac dysrhythmia (10% to 5%) and wound complications (14% to 11%) by the epidural analgesic regimen. The incidence of deep venous thrombosis (125I-fibrinogen scan) was 32% after general anaesthesia and low-dose heparin and 34% after epidural analgesia with no prophylactic antithrombotic treatment (P greater than 0.9). Postoperative weight loss and decrease in serum-albumin and serum-transferrin, as well as the reduction in haemoglobin and the need for postoperative transfusions, were similar in the two groups. Convalescence, as assessed by postoperative fatigue, restoration of bowel function (flatus, bowel movement and food intake) and the time until the patients were self-aided at their preoperative level, was not reduced by epidural analgesia. Since 50% of the patients in each group suffered from one or more of the above-mentioned postoperative complications, this epidural regimen was not effective in reducing postoperative morbidity after major abdominal surgery despite the achievement of adequate pain relief.     

The effect of lumbar epidural analgesia on the development of deep vein thrombosis of the legs after open prostatectomy

The occurrence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was studied by the 125-I-fibrinogen uptake test in 38 patients subjected to retropubic prostatectomy. The patients were randomly allocated to two groups: continuous lumbar epidural analgesia for up to 24 hours and general anaesthesia with intermittent positive pressure ventilation. Two of the 17 patients in the epidural group (12%) developed DVT in contrast 11 of the 21 patients in the general anaesthetic group (51%). The difference between the groups was significant. It is concluded that epidural analgesia offers a protection against postoperative DVT and is worth further investigation.     

Blood pressure and heart rate during orthostatic stress and walking with continuous postoperative thoracic epidural bupivacaine/morphine

Thirty-one patients scheduled for elective cholecystectomy performed through a mini-laparotomy, were randomized to received either combined thoracic epidural anaesthesia/light general anaesthesia and postoperative balanced analgesia with continuous epidural bupivacaine 10 mg · h^-1 and morphine 0.2 mg · h^-1 for 38 h after surgery plus systemic ibuprofen 600 mg · 8 h^-1 (N = 15) or general anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia with systemic morphine and ibuprofen 600 mg · 8 h^-1 (N = 16). During postoperative epidural infusion sensory blockade to pinprick was Th4 to L1, and analgesia at rest and during mobilisation was superior compared to systemic morphine and NSAID. There were no significant differences between groups in haemodynamic responses (BP and heart rate) during rest, orthostatic stress and after walking assessed before, 24 and 48 h after operation except for a clinically unimportant lower heart rate (approximately 10 bpm) 48 h after surgery at rest and during orthostatic stress in the epidural group. There was no significant difference between groups in number of patients with a reduction > 20 mmHg (2.7 kPa) in systolic blood pressure during orthostatic stress (two in each group at 24 h) or in number of episodes of dizziness, nausea or vomiting during rest or mobilisation. These results do not support the common belief that low-dose thoracic epidural bupivacaine/morphine may prevent ambulation due to sympathetic blockade or to impaired cardiovascular adaptation to the upright position.     

A comparison of postoperative analgesia following spinal or epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean section

Postoperative analgesia, using a patient-controlled analgesia system, was studied in 32 women after elective Caesarean section performed under either spinal or epidural anaesthesia. Patients who had spinal anaesthesia had significantly higher pain scores and morphine consumption during the first 4 h postoperatively than patients who had epidural anaesthesia. This situation was reversed between 4 to 8 h postoperatively with patients who had had epidurals having significantly higher pain scores despite higher morphine consumption. After 8 h there was little difference in pain scores or morphine use between the two groups. Total morphine consumption in the first 24 h postoperatively was not significantly different between the two groups.     

Effect of epidural versus general anaesthesia on peroperative blood loss during retropubic prostatectomy

Peroperative blood loss, arterial blood pressure and central venous pressure were studied in patients subjected to retropubic prostatectomy. The patients were randomly allocated to two groups, continuous lumbar epidural analgesia for up to 24 hours and a thiopentone-oxyg n-nitrous oxide-alcuronium-pethidine sequence with intermittent positive pressure ventilation. The mean peroperative blood loss during operations under epidural analgesia was significantly less than that under general anaesthesia (370±34 ml vs. 59035 ml, mean SE). Only one patient out of 17 cases of epidural analgesia needed a peroperative blood transfusion, in contrast to 5 out of 21 general anaesthesias. Both the arterial systolic and diastolic pressures, and central venous pressure were significantly lower under epidural analgesia than general anaesthesia. It was concluded that decreased arterial and venous pressure were responsible for the reduced blood loss under epidural analgesia.     

Severe respiratory depression after epidural morphine in a patient with myotonic dystrophy

We describe a patient with myotonic dystrophy who underwent cholecystectomy, and developed severe respiratory depression following epidural administration of morphine to provide post-operative analgesia. At preoperative assessment, he demonstrated near normal vital capacity and maximal voluntary ventilation, but the presence of chronic ventilatory failure with a resting value of PaCO₂ 51 mmHg. Anaesthesia was produced by a combination of epidural and light general anaesthesia without intravenous anaesthetics, narcotics or neuromuscular relaxants. Five hours after epidural administration of 2 mg morphine, the patient developed severe respiratory depression with a PaCO₂ of 93 mmHg. Intravenous naloxone resulted in transient improvement in minute volume, suggesting that epidural morphine was responsible for the depression. Epidural morphine can cause unexpected respiratory depression, even at a small dose, because of the sensitivity of the respiratory centre to morphine in patients with myotonic dystrophy.