A long-term study of the efficacy of treatment of localized prostate cancer

This paper presents a retrospective comparison of patients undergoing treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer. We reviewed the age, grade, and stage at diagnosis as well as the survival and recurrence rates of 222 patients treated for carcinoma of the prostate with either radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiotherapy (XRT) at four Army medical centers. Mean follow-up was 8.02 years (range 0.026–32.5 years). Stage and grade were similar in patients receiving either RP or XRT. Kaplan-Meier estimates showed that patients who underwent RP had a significantly greater disease-specific survival (p = 0.0001) and a significantly lower rate of distant metastases (p = 0.006) than did those who received XRT. There was no significant difference in the rate of local progression (p = 0.276) or in the mean time to local progression (XRT = 3.5, RP = 4.0 years) or to distant metastases (XRT = 3.79, RP = 4.52 years). Cox proportional hazards model incorporating age, stage, grade, and treatment type demonstrated that those patients who received XRT had more than two times the risk of dying of their disease than did those who underwent RP (risk ratio = 2.37; 95% confidence interval = 1.49–3.76). These data in similar groups of patients suggest that metastasis-free survival is improved in those who receive RP compared with XRT and that this translates into an enhanced survival advantage. Further study of larger groups of patients stratified by risk factors in randomized, prospective trials with longer follow-up will improve our ability to determine the best treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer.     

A 3-y prospective study of health-related and disease-specific quality of life in patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy or external beam radiotherapy

We assessed the longitudinal alteration of the quality of life (QOL) of patients with localized prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy or hormonoradiotherapy during 3-y follow-up. In addition, we examined the impact on QOL of initiation of second treatment after failure of primary treatment. In all, 135 patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy (RP) (N=84) or external beam radiotherapy with neoadjuvant hormone (XRT) (N=51) at our institute and who had a minimum follow-up of 3 y were included in this study. Data were collected prospectively, at baseline, at 3 months after treatment, at 1 y, and annually thereafter. QOL, generic and disease-targeted was evaluated using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Prostate Cancer QOL Questionnaire, the Sapporo Medical University Sexual Function Questionnaire, the International Prostate Symptom Index Quality of Life Score and similar questions regarding bowel function. Repeated-measures ANOVA revealed significantly different patterns of alteration in the domains of QOL, with the exception of several domains, between the RP and XRT groups. Rapid decline of sexual function and increase in sexual bothersomeness were followed by slight amelioration throughout follow-up in the RP group, and did not change thereafter in the XRT group. Overall satisfaction with urinary condition significantly improved after treatment and that with bowel condition was stable during follow-up in both of the groups. Failure of primary treatment and initiation of salvage treatment had no impact on QOL. This prospective study revealed longitudinal alteration of QOL status of patients undergoing treatment for localized prostate cancer, but did not yield any conclusions regarding effect of treatment failure and second treatment on QOL due to small sample size. It should be noted that different instruments for assessment of QOL can generate different outcomes.     

Health related quality of life in Japanese men after radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: We performed a retrospective survey of general and disease specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after radical prostatectomy (RP) and external beam radiotherapy (XRT) in Japanese men. METHODS: A total of 186 patients underwent RP and 78 underwent XRT for clinically localized prostate cancer between 2000 and 2002. We measured the general and disease specific HRQOL with the MOS 36-Item Health Survey and the University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index, respectively. Each treatment group was further divided into four subgroups according to the time scale. RESULTS: Patients from the RP group were significantly younger than those from the XRT group. The tumor characteristics differed significantly in their distributions among the treatment groups. Patients undergoing XRT had low scores in most of the general measures of HRQOL just after treatment, but after 6 months there were no differences between the treatment groups, except for the physical domains. The RP group was associated with worse urinary function, whereas the XRT group had worse bowel function and bother during the first 6 months after treatment. Thereafter, however, urinary and bowel domain did not differ between the groups. Both groups reported poor sexual function, although the RP group scored lower sexual bother. CONCLUSION: The patients who underwent RP had significantly worse urinary and better bowel function than those treated with XRT. Both treatment groups had decrements in sexual function throughout the post-treatment period; careful attention should be paid to this side-effect in preoperative counselling, especially in younger patients, regardless of the primary treatments.     

Survey of factors underlying treatment choice for patients with localized prostate cancer (radical prostatectomy vs extrabeam radiotherapy)

PURPOSE: Little is known regarding factors for decision-making on treatment by localized prostate cancer patients. We therefore conducted a survey series of cases for influence on treatment decision making, and also satisfaction after therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 51 patients with localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) were mailed original questionnaires about their treatment decision-making factors and satisfaction and the results compared between the two groups. RESULT: Some 48 (94.1%) patients responded to the questionnaire, 38 (79.2%) and 10 (20.8%) after RP and EBRT, respectively. The major factor determining the decision as to treatment approach was the physician in both groups (more than 90%). Excluding physicians, family or others were more important in the RP group than the EBRT group (p = 0.023). RP group patients desired removal of their prostate for cancer control, while, EBRT group patients favored the less invasive approach in consideration of side effects. Over 80% patients indicated they would definitely or probably choose the same treatment again, although some of the RP group would switch to watchful-waiting because of sexual dysfunction, urinary incontinence and the invasive nature of the procedure. CONCLUSION: Physicians are in a most important position to help patients understand prostate cancer and treatment, outcomes, and need to help them make their best choice, with appropriate follow up including mental care.     

Influence of nerve-sparing (NS) procedure during radical prostatectomy (RP) on margin status and biochemical failure

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether nerve-sparing procedure itself is a risk factor for biochemical recurrence in carefully selected patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We compared patients of our historical series who in retrospect were candidates for nerve-sparing (NS) procedure with a contemporary cohort of patients. With respect to stage migration and selection bias between these two groups we performed a multivariate analysis adjusting for all explanatory variables in the model. NS was performed in n = 723 patients (bilateral n = 359, unilateral n = 364) in comparison to n = 620 patients undergoing non-NS RP, comprising n = 756 patients within the favorable pT2 category. We examined the association of clinical and histopathological parameters in relation to PSA recurrence in uni- and multivariate analyses including NS as a variable. Furthermore, for each prostate lobe separately we determined whether surgical procedure (nerve-sparing vs. non-nerve-sparing RP) resulted in a positive margin. RESULTS: In univariate analysis there was no difference in pT2 (log rank p = 0.091), pT3a (log rank p = 0.171) and pT3b (log rank p = 0.110) cancers between patients treated with NS compared to non-NS surgery. The 3- and 5-year recurrence free survival rate for patients with pT2, pT3a and pT3b cancers treated by NS vs. non-NS were 96.3/94.9 vs. 94.9/90.8, 75.0/61.8 vs. 73.4/55.0 and 46/30 vs. 38/23. Multivariate regression analysis showed no association with PSA failure (p = 0.798) for patients who underwent NS. Capsular penetration (p < 0.001), lymph-node status (p < 0.001), seminal vesicle invasion (p < 0.001), surgical margin status (p = 0.0130), Gleason score (p < 0.001) and preoperative PSA (p = 0.005) were significantly associated with risk of failure. The positive margin rate per each prostate lobe in pT2 cancers was 6.5% vs. 5.1% in NS and non-NS cases, 10.3% vs. 17.3% in patients with extracapsular extension and 15.0% vs. 25.1% in cases with seminal vesicle invasion respectively. CONCLUSION: NS RP is an oncologically safe procedure provided that appropriate preoperative selection of patients by means of a validated nomogram is performed. Moreover, evaluation of positive margins in patients undergoing NS and non-NS RP revealed no evidence that adequacy of tumor excision is compromised by NS procedure.     

Comparison of Gleason scores from sextant prostate biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens.

OBJECTIVES: We compared the Gleason scores obtained from sextant prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens in patients with localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-one patients having a clinical diagnosis of localized prostate cancer underwent needle biopsy under transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) and RP. Grading and staging were assigned based on Gleason scores and the TNM system, respectively. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 65.5 +/- 13.43 years and mean PSA level was 14.69 +/- 3.95. Mean Gleason score for prostate biopsy and RP specimen were 5.85 +/- 0.7 and 6.34 +/- 1.44, respectively. With respect to clinical stage, there were 20 patients in stage 1 and 41 patients in stage 2 prostate cancer. Comparing the Gleason scores, the biopsy score was lower in 26 (42.26%) and higher than RP specimens in 7 (11.84%) cases, and there was agreement between the biopsy and RP specimens in 28 (45.9%) patients. The difference between the two Gleason scores was +/- 1 for 18 patients (29.5%) and +/- 2 or more for 17 patients (27.86%). CONCLUSION: In our study, high Gleason score biopsies with elevated PSA level (>10 ng/ml) were risk factors for extraprostatic extension, and we demonstrated that Gleason scores were significantly correlated with seminal vesicle and lymph node invasion (p < 0.05). The Gleason scores of biopsy and RP specimens agreed with 45.9% of TRUS-guided sextant prostate biopsies, and this ratio was 91.1% in moderately differentiated tumors Copyright 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel     

Radical prostatectomy versus high-dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer: effects on health-related quality of life

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of different treatments on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of men with localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 1997 and August 2002, 182 men diagnosed with prostate cancer (T1c to T3bN0M0) had radical prostatectomy (RP, 89) or (192)iridium high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT, 93) with external beam radiotherapy, and were followed for > or = 6 months. A postal survey was sent in which HRQoL was assessed using the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) QoL questionnaire, and disease-specific QoL using the University of California Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA-PCI). RESULTS: Questionnaire responses were obtained from 151 of 182 patients; there was no significant difference in SF-36 scale scores between men treated with RP or HDR-BT. In the UCLA-PCI, the HDR-BT group had better urinary function (P < 0.001) and sexual function scores (P= 0.043). Men treated with RP had better bowel bother scores (P = 0.027). In patients with > or = 2 years of follow-up, urinary function (P < 0.001) and sexual bother (P = 0.029) were better for men treated with HDR-BT than for men treated with RP. Men treated with HDR-BT had significantly better urinary function (P = 0.009) and sexual bother (P = 0.013) even than 30 men treated with unilateral nerve-sparing RP. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of HRQoL, RP and HDR-BT did not differ, but HDR-BT resulted in better urinary and sexual function than RP. When planning treatment, QoL concerns, including mental health issues associated with prostate cancer, need to be addressed with the patients, as do the potential side-effects.     

Fear of cancer recurrence in patients undergoing definitive treatment for prostate cancer: results from CaPSURE

PURPOSE: Contemporary cancer treatments have resulted in patients living longer but with the risk of disease recurrence. Studies suggest that fear of recurrence is a significant burden. We described fear of cancer recurrence in patients with prostate cancer undergoing treatment with radical prostatectomy (RP), radiation (XRT) or brachytherapy (BT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 519 patients (326 RP, 53 XRT, 140 BT) were identified from CaPSURE (Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor), a national longitudinal registry of men with prostate cancer. To be included in the study patients had to complete at least 1 pretreatment and 2 posttreatment health related quality of life questionnaires and have complete clinical information. Fear of cancer recurrence was assessed with a validated 5-item scale, and was described at baseline and up to 2 years after treatment. Multivariate linear regression was performed to determine significant predictors of fear of cancer recurrence. RESULTS: Men receiving XRT were older and had worse clinical disease characteristics than patients treated with RP or BT. For all groups fear of cancer recurrence was more severe before treatment and improved after treatment but did not change substantially in the 2 years thereafter. Regression revealed that only general health and mental health were important predictors of fear of cancer recurrence. No other general or disease specific health related quality of life domains or clinical characteristics contributed appreciable explanatory power. CONCLUSIONS: Fear of prostate cancer recurrence imposes a substantial burden in patients before and after treatment. Understanding the fear of cancer recurrence associated with different treatments can help physicians better counsel patients and promote psychological well-being.     

Health-related quality of life and satisfaction with care among older men treated for prostate cancer with either radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy

OBJECTIVE: To analyse health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and satisfaction with care across potential curative treatments for older patients newly diagnosed with prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective cohort study we recruited 115 older patients (> or =65 years) newly diagnosed with prostate cancer from the urology clinics of an urban academic and a Veterans' Administration (VA) hospital. Patients completed generic (Short Form-36), prostate-specific (University of California Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index) HRQoL, and Client Satisfaction with Care (CSQ-8) surveys before treatment with either radical prostatectomy (RP) or external beam irradiation (EBRT) and at 3, 6 and 12 months afterward. Clinical and demographic data were obtained via medical chart review. A repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to examine changes in generic and prostate cancer-specific HRQoL between treatments. Log-linear regression was used to analyse the factors associated with 12-month HRQoL scores, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to compare the return to baseline values for HRQoL. RESULTS: The RP group had significantly higher income, education and better general health than the EBRT group. Age (odds ratio 0.5, 95% confidence interval 0.32-0.82), non-VA hospital (28.8, 2-402) and prostate-specific antigen level at diagnosis (2.8, 1.05-7.5) were associated with RP. The analysis results indicated that the RP group had higher scores for generic HRQoL subscales of physical function (P = 0.019), role emotional (P = 0.037), vitality (P = 0.033) and general health (P = 0.05) than the EBRT group. A log-linear regression model for predicting the 12-month scores showed that RP was associated with higher scores for most of the generic HRQoL and bowel function (odds ratio 1.12, P = 0.03), urinary bother (1.6, P = 0.014) and bowel bother (1.5, P = 0.013). Being older was associated with a lower score on bowel function (0.98, P = 0.05) and sexual function (0.92, P = 0.05). Satisfaction with care was comparable between treatment groups at baseline and at the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients tolerate RP well from the HRQoL perspective and thus decisions for therapy in this age cohort should not be based primarily on age.     

Reconsidering the use of the International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire in evaluating the preoperative erectile function status of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), routinely used in patients being treated for localized prostate cancer, including potency-preserving, nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (RP), as many patients complain that the results of the IIEF over 4 weeks before RP are not representative. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 123 consecutive patients (mean age 64.6 years, range 52-78) who had endoscopic-extraperitoneal RP and who completed the IIEF. The interval between the diagnosis of the disease and surgery was >4 weeks in all. The patients completed the same questionnaire referring to the last 4 weeks before their prostate biopsy, as a modified index of their sexual status (IIEFm and EFm). RESULTS: The clinical stage of disease was cT1c (34.9%), cT2a (49.5%), cT2b (5.7%) and cT2c (9.9%) before RP. The mean IIEF score was 42.8 and the mean EF domain score was 16.9; the mean IIEFm was 54.9 and the EFm domain score was 23.7. All the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The IIEF questionnaire scores are influenced by many factors. Depression after a diagnosis of cancer, and the prostate biopsy-related symptoms, e.g. prostatitis, perineal pain and haemospermia, might compromise the patients' well-being and libido, and thus affect the IIEF scores before RP. We therefore suggest using the IIEFm and EFm scores before prostate biopsy to assess the patients' sexual status before any treatment for localized prostate cancer.     

Patients’ perspective of botulinum toxin‐A as a long‐term treatment option for neurogenic detrusor overactivity secondary to spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate patients’ perspective on whether they would consider botulinum toxin‐A (BTX‐A) injections as a long‐term treatment option for managing their neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) secondary to spinal cord injury (SCI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 72 patients with SCI and urodynamically confirmed NDO refractory to anticholinergics, who have had at least one or more injections with BTX‐A were invited to participate in a 5‐min telephone questionnaire covering various aspects of their treatment. Questions about patient satisfaction were rated on a scale from 1 to 10 (1, not satisfied; to 10, very satisfied).

RESULTS

Of the 72 patients surveyed, 48 (67%) were still actively undergoing repeat BTX‐A injections. The mean patient satisfaction score was 6.2. Of the 48 patients, 43 (90%) replied that they would consider continuing with BTX‐A injections as a long‐term treatment option. Only seven (15%) of patients still having BTX‐A injections would consider an alternative permanent surgical option in the next 5 years. Of those patients considering a one‐off permanent surgical solution, younger patients were likely to consider this at a later interval than those in an older group (Spearman’s correlation coefficient, ?0.52, 95% confidence interval ?0.78 to ?0.10, P = 0.02). The annual new patient recruitment rate was high (mean 14.4) and the annual withdrawal rate was low (mean 4.8).

CONCLUSION

With high satisfaction and low annual withdrawal rates, there are increasingly many patients on BTX‐A. Most consider continuing BTX‐A injections in the long term, increasing the future demand for this service. There is an urgent need for further research into optimizing the current delivery of an intradetrusor BTX‐A injection service for patients with NDO.     

Health related quality of life patterns in patients treated with interstitial prostate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer--data from CaPSURE

PURPOSE: We measured the impact brachytherapy monotherapy (BMT) has on general and disease specific health related quality of life (HRQOL) compared to patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 419 men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer who enrolled in CaPSURE (Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urological Research Endeavor) data base whose primary treatment was brachytherapy monotherapy (92) or radical prostatectomy (327). The validated RAND 36-Item Health Survey and the UCLA Prostate Cancer Index were used to measure HRQOL before treatment and at 6-month intervals during the first 2 years after treatment. RESULTS: Patients treated with BMT or RP did not differ greatly in general HRQOL after treatment. Both treatment groups showed early functional impairment in most general domains with scores returning to or approaching baseline in most domains 18 to 24 months after treatment. Patients treated with BMT had significantly higher urinary function scores at 0 to 6 months after treatment (84.5, SD 18.7) than patients treated with RP (63.3, SD 26.6). Urinary bother scores at 0 to 6 months after treatment were not significantly different between patients treated with BMT (67.7, SD 31.2) and those treated with RP (67.4, SD 29.1). Both treatment groups had decreases in sexual function that did not return to pretreatment levels. CONCLUSIONS: Overall BMT and RP are well tolerated procedures that cause mild changes in general HRQOL. Disease specific HRQOL patterns are different in patients treated with BMT or RP. Baseline and serial HRQOL measurements after treatment can provide valuable information regarding expected quality of life outcome after treatment for localized prostate cancer.     

Atypia in nonneoplastic prostate glands after radiotherapy for prostate cancer: duration of atypia and relation to type of radiotherapy

It is unknown how long postradiation atypia of benign prostate glands persists and whether the type of radiation is a factor. Forty-four cases consisting of 37 needle biopsies and 7 transurethral resections of the prostate seen in consultation (January 1997 to September 2000) were studied. In two men (5%), the cases were initially sent without a history of radiotherapy. Thirteen patients had minimal cancer (one core) with the remaining showing no residual tumor. Twenty patients were treated with interstitial radiotherapy (brachytherapy) (IRT), 17 with external beam radiation (XRT), and 7 with a combination of both (CT). The time interval between the treatment and tissue sampling ranged from 8 to 72 months (mean 3 months). Slides were reviewed blindly to the type of radiation and the time interval. Radiation-induced atypia in nonneoplastic glands, stromal fibrosis, and vascular changes was scored separately 0-3, with 0 showing no radiation injury and grade 3 showing prominent nuclear atypia, stromal fibrosis, and vascular hyalinization. We derived a combined score for the epithelial atypia from 0 to 300 (% of glands x grade) for each biopsy. For each case, an overall grade from 0 to 3 was given separately for the stromal and vascular changes. Cases were divided into three groups based on time between treatment and biopsy: <24 months (n = 14), between 24 and 48 months (n = 19), and >48 months (n = 11). Because the scores for epithelial atypia with IRT and CT were the same, we combined them into one group. There was more atypia in cases treated with IRT/CT (mean score 190) than XRT (mean score 105) (p <0.00001). There was also a greater degree of stromal fibrosis with IRT/CT than XRT (p <0.04). There was no correlation between the type of treatment and the effect on vessels. There was no change over time in epithelial atypia in men treated with IRT/CT. With XRT, there was less epithelial atypia in cases biopsied >48 months after treatment (mean score 57) compared with those with a shorter interval between biopsy and treatment (mean score 132) (p = 0.02). Radiation atypia in benign prostate glands may persist for a long time after the initial treatment, resulting in a significant pitfall in evaluating prostate biopsies. Prominent radiation effect (100% of the glands showing grade 2 and 3 atypia) was detected up to 72 months in one of the patients treated with IRT. In some cases, the clinician may not be aware of a prior remote history of radiation or does not relay this history to the pathologist. The pathologist must recognize radiation atypia without relying on the clinician to provide this history. The type of radiation therapy (IRT/CT vs XRT) is a major factor in the degree and duration of postradiation epithelial atypia.     

Permanent 125I-seed brachytherapy or radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparison considering oncological and quality of life results

OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality of life in patients with prostate cancer after permanent brachytherapy (BT) or radical perineal prostatectomy (RP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The American Brachytherapy Society recommends the permanent implantation of radioactive seeds as a monotherapy for patients with T1-T2aN0M0 prostate cancer and a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of < or = 10 ng/mL, a Gleason score of <7 and a prostate volume of <60 mL. Using these criteria, 132 patients with low-risk prostate cancer were selected; 52 had BT with 125I-seed implantation, 38 had RP with unilateral nerve-sparing (RP + NS) and 42 extended RP (RP group). Only patients with unilateral tumour on biopsy were considered. Before therapy and 6, 12 and 24 months afterward, patients completed questionnaires to assess perceived health and function. PSA relapse was diagnosed with a PSA of >0.1 ng/mL for patients in the RP groups, and three consecutive PSA increases for those after BT. RESULTS: Extraprostatic tumours were found in 18% of specimens taken during RP, and bilateral tumours in 63% of patients. After a mean follow-up of 27 months, there was PSA relapse in two of the 80 patients in the RP and RP + NS groups, and six of the 52 patients in the BT group; a significant difference, with a hazard ratio of 5.2. The acute morbidity was low in all groups. At 1 year, more than two incontinence pads were used by 5% of patients after RP and by 4% after BT. Similarly, at 1 year 15% of patients after RP and 13% after BT were bothered by urinary incontinence. Newly-developed fecal soiling was reported by 4%, 5% and 11% of the RP, RP + NS and BT groups respectively; none of the patients after RP and 4% after BT were bothered by this symptom. The duration and stiffness of erection was assessed after 1 year and reported to be equal or slightly decreased by a third after RP + NS and 38% after BT. Taking a 5-10 point difference as clinically relevant, role, emotional and social functioning were improved considerably after RP + NS than after BT, but sexual activity was impaired significantly after RP + NS than after BT. CONCLUSIONS: Both therapies showed typical acute and late morbidity; the most bothersome late symptoms were urinary incontinence for patients after RP and fecal soiling after BT. Sexual function was impaired significantly in patients who were potent before RP + NS, whereas after BT men reported only a minor change in sexual performance at 1 year. Tumour control after a median follow-up of 27 months was better after RP but biochemical recurrence may still occur after > or = 5 years; therefore the present results are not mature enough and there were too few patients to provide a more definitive statement. As approximately 18% of patients considered to be appropriate candidates for BT had tumours extending beyond the prostate capsule or invading the seminal vesicles, nomograms are needed for more accurate information before therapy.     

维吾尔族可摘局部义齿修复患者人格特征及满意度相关性研究

目的:探讨维吾尔族可摘局部义齿(Removable partial denture,RPD)患者人格特征与满意度的相关性。方法:选择新疆医科大学第一附属医院口腔修复科就诊的129例维吾尔族患者为研究对象,就患者基本情况、艾森克人格类型及修复1个月后满意度进行调查分析并对其结果进行总结分析。结果:维吾尔族可摘局部义齿修复患者年龄、性别、文化、对RPD相关知识的了解度、牙齿缺损数量均与RPD修复满意度显著相关(P0.05);维吾尔族的N量表得分均与满意度中的咀嚼能力、稳固性、舒适性呈显著负相关,P量表得分均与满意度中的美观性、语言力呈负相关,E量表得分与总体满意度显著正相关。结论:维吾尔族可摘局部义齿修复患者的人格特征影响其对RPD治疗满意度的评价     

Does the time from biopsy to surgery affect biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the time from biopsy to radical prostatectomy (RP) predicts the biochemical recurrence (BCR) after RP, as men diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer have several available treatment options and investigating these alternatives may delay the initiation of definitive therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified 3969 consecutive patients who had RP for clinically localized prostate cancer from 1987 to 2002; those eligible for the study had RP within a year of diagnosis. The interval between biopsy and RP was analysed both as a continuous and as a dichotomous variable (divided at 3 months). Multivariate analysis was used to evaluate the impact of time to RP on BCR. Subsets were also analysed for the effect of time to RP in patients considered to be at high risk of recurrence, with group 1 having a prostate specific antigen (PSA) level of > or = 20 ng/mL, a biopsy Gleason score of > or = 8, or clinical stage > or = T2c; and group 2 assessed as having a >40% probability of BCR using a preoperative nomogram. RESULTS: In all, 3149 patients met the inclusion criteria and had a mean (interquartile range) follow-up after RP of 5.4 (2.2-7.9) years. Multivariate analysis showed that the year of biopsy, PSA level before biopsy, clinical stage and biopsy Gleason score (all P < 0.001) were significantly associated with BCR after RP. The time to RP, treated either as a continuous variable (P = 0.252) or when categorized at 3 months (P = 0.939), failed to predict BCR. Further, the time to RP was not an independent predictor of BCR for patients at high risk of recurrence in group 1 (P = 0.147) or group 2 (P = 0.548). CONCLUSIONS: The time from biopsy to RP did not influence the probability of BCR for men who had RP within a year of diagnosis, even for those considered to be at high risk of BCR. Instead, the clinical and pathological features of the cancer provided the best estimate of the risk of BCR.     

Reasonable Delay of Surgical Treatment in Men with Localized Prostate Cancer - Impact on Prognosis?

PURPOSE: In many centers patients with clinically localized prostate cancer might be confronted with a delay in therapy due to not immediately available treatment capacity at that specific center. Furthermore, a growing amount of patients want to have a second or third opinion before they finally decide what therapeutic option to choose. We investigated whether a reasonable delay from diagnosis to definitive treatment impact recurrence free survival rates in men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) for localized prostate cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Preoperative data of 795 men treated for localized prostate cancer by RP between 1/1992 and 6/2000 were evaluated including pretreatment PSA, clinical stage and biopsy Gleason score. In addition, time from biopsy to the date of RP was obtained and investigated as a potential prognostic factor. The influence of the time gap between biopsy and surgery was statistically evaluated by univariate Cox regression analyses and Kaplan-Meier analyses; a multivariate Cox Modell was performed including all preoperative parameters. Relapse following RP was defined as a postoperative PSA level >0.1 ng/ml. RESULTS: Mean followup of the patients was 33 months (1-116 months). Twenty-five percent of the patients failed during that time period. Mean time gap between diagnosis and treatment was 62 days (median 54 days) ranging from 5 to 518 days. Univariate Cox regression analysis showed no significant correlation (p=0.062) of waiting time with recurrence rate. Multivariate Cox regression documented a highly significant association of PSA (p<0.001), clinical stage (p=0.001) and biopsy Gleason grade (p<0.001) but not not for time to treatment (p=0.841). In patients with high-grade cancer again no significant impact of treatment delay was found. CONCLUSION: Treatment delay in the investigated time span of a few months did not adversely affect recurrence free survival rates. Patients can be reassured that they can evaluate treatment options without compromising efficacy due to a delay in treatment.     

Determinants of long-term quality of life and voiding function of patients treated with radical prostatectomy or permanent brachytherapy for prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term quality of life (QoL) outcomes of three treatments for localized prostate cancer: radical prostatectomy (RP); brachytherapy monotherapy (BTM); and BT combined with external beam radiotherapy (BTC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In August 2000, questionnaires were mailed to men with T1c-T3 adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated with either RP, BTM ((103)Pd monotherapy) or BTC. Questionnaires included validated outcome measures, i.e. the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G), American Urological Association Symptom Score (AUA-SS), Urinary Function Questionnaire for men after RP, and the Brief Sexual Function Inventory. Returned questionnaires were assessed using cross-sectional analysis. RESULTS: Data from 214 patients were included in the analysis (60 RP, 102 BTM and 52 BTC); the median follow-up was 18.8, 25.5 and 29.9 months, respectively. There were differences between both BT groups and the RP group in total AUA-SS and obstructive subscale symptom scores, with the former having worse symptom scores at a longer follow-up. Differences in overall QoL were not detected between groups using the total FACT-G but the BTC group generally had worse scores in the physical well-being subscale. The BT groups had higher continence rates with time after treatment. Sexual function was better with BT initially, but these differences did not persist at a longer follow-up. There were significant correlations between the FACT-G and the urinary symptom scores, and the degree of sexual function. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients treated with BTM and RP have a different spectrum of side-effects, their overall long-term QoL is similar, with urinary and sexual function being the primary determinants of this outcome. Men treated with BTC have a worse QoL.     

E-cadherin expression as a marker of tumor aggressiveness in routinely processed radical prostatectomy specimens

OBJECTIVES: Approximately 30% of clinically localized prostate adenocarcinomas treated by radical prostatectomy (RP) will recur within 10 years. To prevent recurrence, new adjuvant therapies are in development that seek to treat high-risk patients after surgery. To identify patients as candidates for these treatments, improved biomarkers for predicting prognosis are needed. Reduced expression of E-cadherin has been proposed as a new marker for predicting prognosis in prostate adenocarcinoma. Since few studies have examined the relation between risk factors for disease progression and E-cadherin expression using routinely processed RP specimens, we used RP specimens to correlate downregulation of E-cadherin and pathologic stage at RP. METHODS: Primary adenocarcinomas (n = 76) from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded RP specimens were evaluated by immunohistochemistry against E-cadherin (HECD-1) using heat-induced epitope retrieval and automated staining (BioTek Solutions). Normal appearing prostate epithelium was used as an internal control for each specimen. Staining was scored as an estimate of the percentage of tumor cells in each specimen that showed strong plasma membrane staining. RESULTS: Specimens were divided into three categories with respect to Gleason score: intermediate (score 5 to 6, n = 31), intermediate to high (score 7, n = 25), and high (score 8 to 9, n = 20). For pathologic stage, specimens were divided into three categories: low stage/organ confined (pT2, n = 30), intermediate stage/limited extraprostatic extension (pT3a, n = 25), and high stage/seminal vesicle-pelvic lymph node metastases (pT3b-any pTN1, n = 21). In univariate analysis, reduced levels of E-cadherin correlated with advanced Gleason score (P = 0.003) and advanced pathologic stage (P = 0.008). In multivariate analysis, E-cadherin, preoperative prostate-specific antigen, and Gleason score all contributed independently to the prediction of high-stage disease (P<0.0001). Ten pelvic lymph node metastases from this same patient cohort were stained for E-cadherin. All were positive and 9 of 10 were moderately to strongly positive. CONCLUSIONS: Since essentially all patients in the high-stage category have a very high likelihood of disease recurrence, we conclude that the study of E-cadherin in a prospective manner as a potential biomarker of disease progression in patients with clinically organ-confined prostate cancer who undergo RP is warranted. Additionally, our finding that most metastatic tumor cells in pelvic lymph nodes express E-cadherin supports the notion that the establishment of the distant colonization and growth of metastatic tumor cells may be facilitated by expression or re-expression of previously downregulated E-cadherin. This would strongly suggest that irreversible genetic inactivation through mutation or allelic loss at 16q2.3 is probably not the mechanism of E-cadherin downregulation in most abnormally expressing primary prostate carcinomas.     

Psychiatric differences between liver transplant candidates with familial amyloid polyneuropathy and those with alcoholic liver disease

BACKGROUND: Psychiatric diagnoses are very common in liver transplant candidates, and such diagnoses are predictive of a poor clinical evolution and quality of life after transplantation. Also, nonadherence before the transplant is predictive of nonadherence after the transplant. METHODS: We studied the psychiatric and psychosocial profiles of 85 liver transplant candidates, comprising consecutive patients attending outpatient clinics of a liver transplantation unit at a public hospital. Interviews and questionnaires were used to measure personality traits, symptoms of anxiety and depression, social support, and adherence. These patients were broken into 3 groups: patients with familial amyloid polyneuropathy (n = 20), patients with alcoholic liver disease (n = 33), and patients with other liver diseases (n = 32). RESULTS: About 58% of patients had a current psychiatric diagnosis (24.8%, major depressive disorder, 22.3% generalized anxiety disorder, 8.3% adaptive disorder, 2.3% abuse of or dependence on substances other than alcohol). Current psychiatric diagnosis did not differ between patients with familial amyloid polyneuropathy and patients with alcoholic liver disease. Patients with alcoholic liver disease showed lower scores for 2 protective personality traits, social support and adherence to medication, than other patients. Patients with familial amyloid polyneuropathy showed higher scores for those traits. CONCLUSIONS: All patients waiting for a liver transplant should undergo psychiatric and psychological assessment. Some psychological characteristics such as personality traits and social support differ between clinical groups, so it may be useful to design different approaches for each group. Patients with alcoholic liver disease may require a special approach to improve adherence to medication.