Influence of definition and location of hypotension on outcome following severe pediatric traumatic brain injury

OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of definition and location (field, emergency department, or pediatric intensive care unit) of hypotension on outcome following severe pediatric traumatic brain injury. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Harborview Medical Center (level I pediatric trauma center), Seattle, WA, over a 5-yr period between 1998 and 2003. PATIENTS: Ninety-three children <14 yrs of age with traumatic brain injury following injury, head Abbreviated Injury Score > or = 3, and pediatric intensive care unit admission Glasgow Coma Scale score <9 formed the analytic sample. Data sources included the Harborview Trauma Registry and hospital records. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The relationship between hypotension and outcome was examined comparing two definitions of hypotension: a) systolic blood pressure <5th percentile for age; and b) systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg. Hospital discharge Glasgow Outcome Score <4 or disposition of either death or discharge to a skilled nursing facility was considered a poor outcome. Pediatric intensive care unit and hospital length of stay were also examined. Systolic blood pressure <5th percentile for age was more highly associated with poor hospital discharge Glasgow Outcome Score (p = .001), poor disposition (p = .02), pediatric intensive care unit length of stay (rate ratio 9.5; 95% confidence interval 6.7-12.3), and hospital length of stay (rate ratio 18.8; 95% confidence interval 14.0-23.5) than systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg. Hypotension occurring in either the field or emergency department, but not in the pediatric intensive care unit, was associated with poor Glasgow Outcome Score (p = .008), poor disposition (p = .03), and hospital length of stay (rate ratio 18.7; 95% confidence interval 13.1-24.2). CONCLUSIONS: Early hypotension, defined as systolic blood pressure <5th percentile for age in the field and/or emergency department, was a better predictor of poor outcome than delayed hypotension or the use of systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg.     

Interrater reliability of cardiac output measurements by transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound: implications for noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in the ED

INTRODUCTION: Hemodynamic monitoring is an important aspect of caring for the critically ill patients boarding in the emergency department (ED). The purpose of this study is to investigate the interrater agreement of noninvasive cardiac output measurements using transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound technique. METHODS: This is a prospective observational cohort study performed in a 32-bed adult ED of an academic tertiary center with approximately 65000 annual patient visits. Patients were enrolled after verbal consent over a 7-month period. The raters were ED personnel involved in patient care. Paired measurements of cardiac index (CI) and stroke volume index (SVI) were obtained from a transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound cardiac output monitor. RESULTS: A convenience sample of 107 (50 women and 57 men) patients with a median age of 49 (32, 62) years was enrolled. One hundred two paired measurements were performed in 91 patients in whom adequate Doppler ultrasound signals were obtainable. The raters included 35 emergency medicine attending physicians, 31 emergency medicine residents, 80 medical students, 47 nurses, and 11 emergency medical technicians. Cardiac index range was 0.6 to 5.3 L/min per square meter, and SVI range was 7.7 to 63.0 mL/m(2). The correlation of CI measurements between 2 raters was good (r(2) = 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-1.00; P < .001). Likewise, SVI measurements between 2 raters also showed acceptable correlation (r(2) = 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.96; P < .001). Interrater reliability was strong for CI (kappa = 0.83 with 92.2% agreement) and SVI measurements (kappa = 0.72 with 88.2% agreement). Most patients had an interrater difference below 10% in CI and SVI measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency department personnel, regardless of their role in patient care, are able to obtain reliable cardiac output measurements in ED patients over a wide range of CI and SVI. Transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound technique may be an alternative to traditional invasive hemodynamic monitoring of critically ill patients presenting to the ED.     

Duplex Ultrasound in the Emergency Department for the Diagnostic Management of Clinically Suspected Deep Vein Thrombosis

Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy and safety of an emergency duplex ultrasound (EDUS) evaluation performed by emergency physicians in the emergency department.
Methods: Consecutive adult patients suspected of having their first episode of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) presenting to the emergency department were included in the study. All examinations were performed by emergency physicians trained with a 30-hour ultrasound course. Based on EDUS findings, patients were classified into one of three groups: normal, abnormal, and uncertain. Patients with abnormal and uncertain findings were initially treated as having a DVT. Patients with normal EDUS findings were discharged from the emergency department without anticoagulant therapy. A formal duplex ultrasound evaluation was repeated by a radiologist in all patients within 24–48 hours. Patients with normal findings on duplex ultrasound evaluation were followed up for symptomatic venous thromboembolism for up to one month.
Results: A total of 399 patients were studied. The EDUS findings were normal in 301 (75%), abnormal in 90 (23%), and uncertain in eight (2%). All abnormal test results were confirmed by the formal duplex ultrasound evaluation, and three patients (0.8%) with uncertain findings on EDUS examination were subsequently diagnosed as having a distal DVT (positive predictive value, 95% [95% confidence interval, 92% to 95%]; negative predictive value, 100% [95% confidence interval = 99% to 100%]). No patients with normal findings on EDUS examination died or experienced venous thromboembolism at the one-month follow-up.
Conclusions: EDUS examination yielded a high negative predictive value and good positive predictive value, allowing rapid discharge and avoiding improper anticoagulant treatment.     

Lung Ultrasound Findings Are Associated with Mortality and Need for Intensive Care Admission in COVID-19 Patients Evaluated in the Emergency Department

Lung ultrasound (LUS) has recently been advocated as an accurate tool to diagnose coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. However, reports on its use are based mainly on hypothesis studies, case reports or small retrospective case series, while the prognostic role of LUS in COVID-19 patients has not yet been established. We conducted a prospective study aimed at assessing the ability of LUS to predict mortality and intensive care unit admission of COVID-19 patients evaluated in a tertiary level emergency department. Patients in our sample had a median of 6 lung areas with pathologic findings (inter-quartile range [IQR]: 6, range: 0–14), defined as a score different from 0. The median rate of lung areas involved was 71% (IQR: 64%, range: 0–100), while the median average score was 1.14 (IQR: 0.93, range: 0–3). A higher rate of pathologic lung areas and a higher average score were significantly associated with death, with an estimated difference of 40.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4%–68%, p = 0.01) and of 0.47 (95% CI: 0.06–0.93, p = 0.02), respectively. Similarly, the same parameters were associated with a significantly higher risk of intensive care unit admission with estimated differences of 29% (95% CI: 8%–50%, p = 0.008) and 0.47 (95% CI: 0.05–0.93, p = 0.02), respectively. Our study indicates that LUS is able to detect COVID-19 pneumonia and to predict, during the first evaluation in the emergency department, patients at risk for intensive care unit admission and death.     

Implementation of a bundle of quality indicators for the early management of severe sepsis and septic shock is associated with decreased mortality

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the outcome implications of implementing a severe sepsis bundle in an emergency department as a quality indicator set with feedback to modify physician behavior related to the early management of severe sepsis and septic shock. DESIGN: Two-year prospective observational cohort. SETTING: Academic tertiary care facility. PATIENTS: Patients were 330 patients presenting to the emergency department who met criteria for severe sepsis or septic shock. INTERVENTIONS: Five quality indicators comprised the bundle for severe sepsis management in the emergency department: a) initiate central venous pressure (CVP)/central venous oxygen saturation (Scvo2) monitoring within 2 hrs; b) give broad-spectrum antibiotics within 4 hrs; c) complete early goal-directed therapy at 6 hrs; d) give corticosteroid if the patient is on vasopressor or if adrenal insufficiency is suspected; and e) monitor for lactate clearance. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients had a mean age of 63.8 +/- 18.5 yrs, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score 29.6 +/- 10.6, emergency department length of stay 8.5 +/- 4.4 hrs, hospital length of stay 11.3 +/- 12.9 days, and in-hospital mortality 35.2%. Bundle compliance increased from zero to 51.2% at the end of the study period. During the emergency department stay, patients with the bundle completed received more CVP/Scvo2 monitoring (100.0 vs. 64.8%, p < .01), more antibiotics (100.0 vs. 89.7%, p = .04), and more corticosteroid (29.9 vs. 16.2%, p = .01) compared with patients with the bundle not completed. In a multivariate regression analysis including the five quality indicators, completion of early goal-directed therapy was significantly associated with decreased mortality (odds ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.79; p = .01). In-hospital mortality was less in patients with the bundle completed compared with patients with the bundle not completed (20.8 vs. 39.5%, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a severe sepsis bundle using a quality improvement feedback to modify physician behavior in the emergency department setting was feasible and was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality.     

Operational performance of validated physiologic scoring systems for predicting in-hospital mortality among critically ill emergency department patients

OBJECTIVES: New Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II, Morbidity Probability Model at admission (MPM0 II), and Logistic Organ Dysfunction System (LODS) have all demonstrated high accuracy for predicting mortality in intensive care unit populations. We tested the prognostic accuracy of these instruments for predicting mortality among a cohort of critically ill emergency department patients. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Urban, tertiary emergency department, census >100,000. PATIENTS: Nontrauma emergency department patients admitted to an intensive care unit, aged >17 yrs, with initial emergency department vital signs consistent with shock (systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg or shock index >1.0), and with agreement of two independent observers for at least one sign and symptom of inadequate tissue perfusion. INTERVENTIONS: Emergency department variables needed for calculation of each scoring system were prospectively collected, and published formulas were used to calculate the probability of in-hospital death for each scoring system. The main outcome was actual in-hospital mortality. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the predictive ability of each scoring system. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Ninety-one of 202 patients (45%) were included. The mean age was 56 +/- 16 yrs, 42% were female, the mean initial systolic blood pressure was 84 +/- 13 mm Hg, and the average length of stay in the emergency department was 4.2 +/- 2.0 hrs. The in-hospital mortality rate was 21%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for calculated probability of in-hospital mortality for SAPS II was 0.72 (95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.87), for MPM0 II 0.69 (95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.84), and for LODS 0.60 (95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Using variables available in the emergency department, three previously validated intensive care unit scoring systems demonstrated moderate accuracy for predicting in-hospital mortality.     

Unexpected Events during the Intrahospital Transport of Critically Ill Patients

Objectives: To examine unexpected events (UEs) that occur during the intrahospital transport of critically ill emergency department patients.
Methods: This was a prospective observational study of consecutive intrahospital transports between March 2003 and June 2004. The escorting emergency physician completed the data collection document either during or immediately after the transport. This document detailed equipment-related UEs, patient instability and invasive line-related UEs, whether the UEs required intervention, and whether the UEs were potentially life threatening (serious UEs).
Results: Of 339 transports observed, 230 (67.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 62.6% to 72.7%) were associated with 604 UEs. Overall, there was a median of 1.0 UE per transport (range, 0–16). There were 277 (45.9%; 95% CI = 41.8% to 49.9%) UEs related to equipment, 158 (26.2%; 95% CI = 22.7% to 29.9%) related to patient instability, 156 (25.8%; 95% CI = 22.4% to 29.6%) related to equipment lines, and 13 (2.2%, 95% CI = 1.2% to 3.8%) miscellaneous UEs. The most common UEs were oxygen saturation probe failures, lead and line tangles, hypotension, and the wearing off of sedation and/or paralysis. Most UEs (478 [79.1%]; 95% CI = 75.6% to 82.3%) required an intervention. Emergency physicians had a significantly lower UE rate than residents. Thirty serious UEs occurred; 5.0% (95% CI = 3.4% to 7.1%) of UEs and 8.9% (95% CI = 6.2% to 12.5%) of transports were associated with a serious UE. The most common were severe hypotension, decreasing consciousness requiring intubation, and increased intracranial pressure.
Conclusions: Unexpected events during the intrahospital transport of critically ill patients from the emergency department are common and can be potentially life threatening. Transporting physician experience is associated with UE rate. Strict adherence to and review of existing transport guidelines is recommended.     

Impact of delayed transfer of critically ill patients from the emergency department to the intensive care unit

OBJECTIVE: Numerous factors can cause delays in transfer to an intensive care unit for critically ill emergency department patients. The impact of delays is unknown. We aimed to determine the association between emergency department "boarding" (holding admitted patients in the emergency department pending intensive care unit transfer) and outcomes for critically ill patients. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional analytical study using the Project IMPACT database (a multicenter U.S. database of intensive care unit patients). Patients admitted from the emergency department to the intensive care unit (2000-2003) were included and divided into two groups: emergency department boarding >or=6 hrs (delayed) vs. emergency department boarding <6 hrs (nondelayed). Demographics, intensive care unit procedures, length of stay, and mortality were analyzed. Groups were compared using chi-square, Mann-Whitney, and unpaired Student's t-tests. SETTING: Emergency department and intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Patients admitted from the emergency department to the intensive care unit (2000-2003). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Main outcomes were intensive care unit and hospital survival and intensive care unit and hospital length of stay. During the study period, 50,322 patients were admitted. Both groups (delayed, n = 1,036; nondelayed, n = 49,286) were similar in age, gender, and do-not-resuscitate status, along with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score in the subgroup for which it was recorded. Among hospital survivors, the median hospital length of stay was 7.0 (delayed) vs. 6.0 days (nondelayed) (p < .001). Intensive care unit mortality was 10.7% (delayed) vs. 8.4% (nondelayed) (p < .01). In-hospital mortality was 17.4% (delayed) vs. 12.9% (nondelayed) (p < .001). In the stepwise logistic model, delayed admission, advancing age, higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, male gender, and diagnostic categories of trauma, intracerebral hemorrhage, and neurologic disease were associated with lower hospital survival (odds ratio for delayed admission, 0.709; 95% confidence interval, 0.561-0.895). CONCLUSIONS: Critically ill emergency department patients with a >or=6-hr delay in intensive care unit transfer had increased hospital length of stay and higher intensive care unit and hospital mortality. This suggests the need to identify factors associated with delayed transfer as well as specific determinants of adverse outcomes.     

Adherence to resuscitation guidelines during prehospital care of cardiac arrest patients.

OBJECTIVE: The impact of prehospital care after the return of spontaneous circulation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients is not known. This study describes adherence to the resuscitation guidelines, factors associated with poor adherence and possible impact of prehospital postresuscitation care on the outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-seven Finnish out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients hospitalized during 1 year, were analyzed retrospectively. Patient and arrest characteristics, prehospital postresuscitation care and survival to hospital discharge were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Forty percent of the patients received care accordant with the guidelines. Male sex (P=0.045), witnessed arrest (P=0.031), initial ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia rhythm (P=0.007) and the presence of an emergency physician (P=0.017) were associated with care in line with the current guidelines. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, age over median (odds ratio=3.6, 95% confidence interval 1.5-8.6), nonventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia initial rhythm (odds ratio=4.0, 95% confidence interval 1.6-9.8), administration of adrenaline (odds ratio=7.0, 95% confidence interval 2.3-21.4) and unsatisfactory prehospital postresuscitation care (odds ratio=2.5, 95% confidence interval 1.1-6.3) were associated with a failure to survive up to hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Less than 50% of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients received prehospital postresuscitation care compatible with the current guidelines. Markers of poor prognosis were associated with unsatisfactory care, which in turn was more frequent among the patients who did not survive to hospital discharge. The importance of the guidelines should be highlighted in the future.     

ED evaluation of the pediatric trauma patient by ultrasonography

The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of ultrasound examination of pediatric trauma patients by emergency physicians. Pediatric (age less than 18 years) trauma patients presenting to the emergency department of a level I trauma center were prospectively examined with bedside ultrasound during the secondary survey of their trauma resuscitation. Examinations were performed by emergency medicine residents and attending physicians who had completed an 8-hour course on trauma ultrasonography. Trauma physicians providing care to the patient were blinded to the results of the examination. In 47 children (median age 9 years) computed tomography of the abdomen/pelvis or laparotomy were also performed and served as gold standards to verify the presence or absence of free fluid in the abdomen. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the ultrasound examination for the detection of free fluid in the abdominal cavity was 75% (95% confidence interval [CI] 36% to 95%), 97% (95% CI 81% to 100%), and 92% (95% Cl 77% to 98%). Positive and negative predictive values were 90% (95% CI 46% to 100%) and 92% (95% CI 74% to 99%), respectively. Ultrasound examinations took an average of 7 minutes and 36 seconds, although this did not take into consideration delays created by interruptions for other diagnostic tests or procedures. An emergency physician and radiologist agreed on blinded interpretations of 83% of the examinations (kappa = 0.56). Bedside ultrasonography is a reliable and rapid method for screening traumatized children for the presence or absence of free fluid in the peritoneum even in the hands of novice sonographers.     

Personal digital assistants change management more often than paper texts and foster patient confidence.

INTRODUCTION: Rapid retrieval of information, including drug treatment options, is critical to emergency department practice. OBJECTIVES: To assess feasibility and patient acceptance of personal digital assistants and to determine the scope of management changes. METHODS: Emergency medicine residents (EMRs, n = 18) and emergency medicine attending (EMAs, n = 12) used personal digital assistants with drug database and clinical references. Text versions were also available in the emergency department. We did a prospective, random, cross-over time-motion study, recording retrieval time, source, and changes to patient care for 16 and 8 h for EMRs and EMAs, respectively. We surveyed patients for confidence in EMRs and EMAs with personal digital assistants, and perceived efficiency. RESULTS: EMRs accessed paper (n = 131) or personal digital assistant (n = 181) information on 92.3% of patients (n = 17, both). They accessed personal digital assistant on 61.4% of patients vs. 44.5% with texts (odds ratio 1.99, 95% confidence interval 1.4-2.80). Mean access times were 9.3 and 9.4 s, respectively, +1.4 for both. Personal digital assistant access was 75%/25% between pharmacopeia and clinical resource. Personal digital assistants changed drug choice in 39/181 patients (21.5%), and other management (diagnosis, treatment or disposition) in 15/181 patients (8.3%). Odds ratio for change in management for personal digital assistant vs. paper was 2.00 (95% confidence interval 1.11-3.60). We surveyed patient perception for 198 of 295 patients (67.1%). Fifty percent reported more confidence in their EMRs and EMAs with a personal digital assistant, while 5% reported less confidence. Sixty percent agreed strongly that there is too much medical information to remember. CONCLUSIONS: Personal digital assistants are feasible in an academic emergency department and change management more often than texts. EMRs accessed personal digital assistants more often than paper texts. Patient perceptions of physicians who use personal digital assistants are neutral or favorable.     

Initiation of thrombolytic therapy for patients with acute myocardial infarction by emergency physicians: The Hong Kong experience

Abstract Objectives: To compare door-to-needle time and complications for eligible acute myocardial infarction patients receiving thrombolytic therapy in the emergency department and in the coronary care unit. Methods: A prospective study was performed involving all patients with acute myocardial infarction who received thrombolytic therapy either in the emergency department or the coronary care unit during the period January 1995 to March 1996. Patients’ time interval between registration in ED and receiving thrombolytic therapy (door-to-needle time) was the main audit parameter. Other emergency department information collected included inappropriate administration of thrombolytic therapy and the occurrence and management of complications of thrombolytic therapy. Results: In the United Christian Hospital, Hong Kong, 148 patients with acute myocardial infarction received thrombolysis. Sixty-eight cases (group A) received thrombolysis in the emergency department and 80 cases underwent thrombolysis in the coronary care unit. The 80 cases in the coronary care unit included 47 cases (group B) whose diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction and eligibility for thrombolysis were established in the emergency department, and 33 cases (group C) in which there were difficulties in diagnosis or exclusion of contraindications for thrombolysis. The mean door-to-needle times were 31.3 min in group A (95% CI, 27.6–35.1), 54 min in group B (95% CI, 47.8–60.2) and 171.8 min in group C (95% CI, 121.8–211.8). Inappropriate use of thrombolysis in the emergency department occurred in 2.9% of all cases. The most common complication of thrombolysis in the emergency department was hypotension (4.4%). All cases were successfully managed in the emergency department. There was one case of anaphylaxis during streptokinase infusion that required resuscitation in the emergency department. There were no deaths of patients receiving thrombolysis in the emergency department. Conclusion The initial experience of a regional hospital in Hong Kong supports the view that initiation of thrombolytic therapy in the emergency department can achieve a more favourable door-to-needle time without compromising the care of acute myocardial infarction patients.     

A pilot study of emergency medical technicians' field assessment of intoxicated patients' need for ED care

Objective

Alcohol–intoxicated individuals account for a significant proportion of emergency department care and may be eligible for care at alternative sobering facilities. This pilot study sought to examine intermediate-level emergency medical technician (EMT) ability to identify intoxicated individuals who may be eligible for diversion to an alternative sobering facility.

Methods

Intermediate-level EMTs in an urban fire department completed patient assessment surveys for individual intoxicated patients between May and August 2010. Corresponding patient medical records were retrospectively reviewed for diagnosis, disposition, and blood alcohol content. Statistical analysis was conducted to determine correlates of survey response, diagnosis, and disposition; and survey sensitivity and specificity were calculated.

Results

One hundred ninety-seven patient transports and medical records were analyzed. Emergency medical technicians indicated 139 patients (71%) needed hospital-based care, and 155 patients (79%) had a primary ethanol diagnosis. Fourteen patients (7%) were admitted to the hospital, and EMTs identified 93% of admitted patients as requiring hospital-based care. Overall sensitivity and specificity of the survey were 93% (95% confidence interval, 66.1-99.8) and 40% (95% confidence interval, 33.3-47.9), respectively.

Conclusion

Intermediate-level EMTs may be able to play an important role in facilitating triage of intoxicated patients to alternate sobering facilities.     

Randomized, controlled trial on the effect of a 20% mannitol solution and a 7.5% saline/6% dextran solution on increased intracranial pressure after brain injury

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this pilot study was to compare the effects of equimolar doses of hypertonic saline and dextran solution (HSD, Rescueflow) with 20% mannitol solution for reduction of increased intracranial pressure. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled, crossover trial in the intensive care unit of a large teaching hospital. SETTING: Academic hospital and tertiary referral center for neuroscience. PATIENTS: Nine patients with an intracranial pressure of >20 mm Hg were recruited and received two treatments of each, HSD and 20% mannitol, in a randomized order. INTERVENTION: Equimolar, rapid intravenous infusions of either 200 mL of 20% mannitol or 100 mL of 7.5% saline and 6% dextran-70 solution (HSD) over 5 mins. MEASUREMENTS: Intracranial pressure, blood pressure, serum and urine sodium and osmolality, and urine output. MAIN RESULTS: Treatments reduced intracranial pressure with both mannitol (median decrease, 7.5 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval, 5.8-11.8) and HSD (median decrease, 13 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, 11.5-17.3). HSD caused a significantly greater decrease in intracranial pressure than mannitol (p = .044). HSD had a longer duration of effect than mannitol (p = .044). CONCLUSION: When given in an equimolar, rapid, intravenous infusion, HSD reduces intracranial pressure more effectively than mannitol.     

Effect of an Independent‐capacity Protocol on Overcrowding in an Urban Emergency Department

Objectives: The authors hypothesized that a new strategy, termed the independent‐capacity protocol (ICP), which was defined as primary stabilization at the emergency department (ED) and utilization of community resources via transfer to local hospitals, would reduce ED overcrowding without requiring additional hospital resources. Methods: This is a before‐and‐after trial that included all patients who visited an urban, tertiary care ED in Korea from July 2006 to June 2008. To improve ED throughput, introduction of the ICP gave emergency physicians (EPs) more responsibility and authority over patient disposition, even when the patients belonged to another specific clinical department. The ICP utilizes the ED as a temporary, nonspecific place that cares for any patient for a limited time period. Within 48 hours, EPs, associated specialists, and transfer coordinators perform secondary assessment and determine patient disposition. If the hospital is full and cannot admit these patients after 48 hours, the EP and transfer coordinators move the patients to other appropriate community facilities. We collected clinical data such as sex, age, diagnosis, and treatment. The main outcomes included ED length of stay (LOS), the numbers of admissions to inpatient wards, and the mortality rate. Results: A total of 87,309 patients were included. The median number of daily patients was 114 (interquartile range [IQR] = 104 to 124) in the control phase and 124 (IQR = 112 to 135) in the ICP phase. The mean ED LOS decreased from 15.1 hours (95% confidence interval [CI] = 14.8 to 15.3) to 13.4 hours (95% CI = 13.2 to 13.6; p < 0.001). The mean LOS in the emergency ward decreased from 4.5 days (95% CI = 4.4 to 4.6 days) to 3.1 days (95% CI = 3.0 to 3.2 days; p < 0.001). The percentage of transfers from the ED to other hospitals decreased from 3.5% to 2.5% (p < 0.001). However, transfers from the emergency ward to other hospitals increased from 2.9% to 8.2% (p < 0.001). Admissions to inpatient wards from the ED were significantly reduced, and admission from the emergency ward did not change. The ED mortality and hospital mortality rates did not change (p = 0.15 and p = 0.10, respectively). Conclusions: After introduction of the ICP, ED LOS decreased without an increase in hospital capacity.     

Association between out-of-hospital emergency department transfer and poor hospital outcome in critically ill stroke patients

Introduction

Transfer of critically ill patients from outside emergency department has the potential for delaying the admission to the intensive care unit. We sought to determine the effect of outside emergency department transfer on hospital outcomes in critically ill patients with stroke.

Methods

We designed a retrospective cohort analysis using a prospectively compiled and maintained registry (Cerner Project IMPACT). Patients with acute ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage admitted to our intensive care unit from our emergency department and transfers from outside emergency department within 24 hours of stroke between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2008, were selected for the analysis. Data collected included demographics, admission physiologic variables, Glasgow Coma Scale, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, and total intensive care unit and hospital length of stay. Primary (poor) outcome was a composite of death or fully dependent status at hospital discharge, and secondary outcomes were intensive care unit and hospital length of stay. To assess for the impact of outside emergency department transfer on primary and secondary outcomes, demographic and admission clinical variables were used to construct logistic regression models using the outcome measure as a dependent variable.

Results

A total of 448 patients were selected for analysis. The mean age was 65 ± 14 years, of which 214 (48%) were male and 282 (65%) white, 152 (34%) were patients with acute ischemic stroke, and 296 (66%) were patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. The median hospital length of stay was 7 days (interquartile range, 4-11 days) and median intensive care unit length of stay was 2 days (interquartile range, 1-3 days). Overall hospital mortality was 30%, and outside emergency department transfer increased the odds of poor outcome by 2-fold (65% vs 34%; P = .05). Multivariate regression analysis showed that age (odds ratio [OR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.1), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score >14 (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.3-2.7), Glasgow Coma Scale <12 (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.4-2.8), do-not-resuscitate status (OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 2.2-5.9), and outside emergency department transfers (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.02-1.8) were independently associated with poor outcome. Outside emergency department transfer was not significantly associated with secondary outcomes.

Conclusion

These data suggest that in critically ill patients with stroke, transfer from outside emergency department is independently associated with poor outcome at hospital discharge. Further research is needed as to identify the potential causes for this effect.     

Sensitivity of routine intensive care unit surveillance for detecting myocardial ischemia

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of routine intensive care unit surveillance compared with frequent 12-lead electrocardiogram monitoring for detecting electrocardiogram evidence suggestive of prolonged myocardial ischemia in vascular surgery patients. DESIGN: Prospective cohort trial. SETTING: Intensive care unit. PARTICIPANTS: We studied 149 patients undergoing elective infrainguinal or aortic vascular surgery who were admitted to the intensive care unit postoperatively. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were simultaneously monitored with a 10-electrode/12-lead electrocardiogram obtained every 2 mins (criterion standard) and routine intensive care unit surveillance that included standard monitoring (five-electrode/two-lead electrocardiogram with ST segment trends and routine 12-lead electrocardiogram) and clinical assessment for detecting myocardial ischemia. The results of the criterion standard were not available to the caregivers. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We measured the ability of routine intensive care unit surveillance to detect the first 20 mins of electrocardiogram evidence suggestive of myocardial ischemia, defined as ST segment depression or elevation of >/=1 mm in two consecutive leads, during the first postoperative day. Seventeen patients (11%) had electrocardiogram evidence suggestive of prolonged myocardial ischemia, the majority of which occurred in leads V2-V4. The sensitivity of routine intensive care unit surveillance for detecting the first episode of electrocardiogram evidence suggestive of prolonged myocardial ischemia in a patient was 12% (95% confidence interval, 7-17%), and the specificity was 98% (95% confidence interval, 95-100%) with a positive predictive value of 40% (95% confidence interval, 32-48%), a negative predictive value of 90% (95% confidence interval, 85-94%), a positive likelihood ratio of 6, and a negative likelihood ratio of 1. The sensitivity of routine intensive care unit surveillance for detecting all episodes was 3% (95% confidence interval, 2-3%) and the specificity 99% (95% confidence interval, 99-100%) per 20-min monitoring interval, with a positive predictive value of 17% (95% confidence interval, 16-18%), negative predictive value of 95% (95% confidence interval, 95-96%), positive likelihood ratio of 3, and negative likelihood ratio of 1. CONCLUSIONS: Routine intensive care unit surveillance has low sensitivity for detecting electrocardiogram evidence suggestive of prolonged myocardial ischemia compared with frequent 12-lead electrocardiograms. Because detecting electrocardiogram evidence suggestive of prolonged postoperative myocardial ischemia is important, physicians should consider alternative strategies to detect myocardial ischemia.     

Why Bystanders Decline Telephone Cardiac Resuscitation Advice

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate and reason for refusal of telephone‐based cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) instruction by bystanders after the implementation of the dispatch center’s systematic telephone CPR protocol. Methods: Over a 15‐month period the authors prospectively collected all case records from the emergency medical services (EMS) dispatch center when CPR had been proposed to the bystander calling in and recorded the reason for declining or not performing that the bystander spontaneously mentioned. All pediatric and adult traumatic and nontraumatic cases were included. Situations when resuscitation had been spontaneously initiated by bystanders were excluded. Results: During the study period, dispatchers proposed CPR on 264 occasions: 232 adult nontraumatic cases, 17 adult traumatic cases, and 15 pediatric (traumatic and nontraumatic) cases. The proposal was accepted in 163 cases (61.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 54.6% to 66.5%), and CPR was eventually performed in 134 cases (51%, 95% CI = 43.2% to 55.3%). In 35 of the cases where resuscitation was not carried out, the condition of the patient or conditions at the scene made this decision medically appropriate. Of the remaining 95 cases, 55 were due to physical limitations of the caller, and 33 were due to emotional distress. Conclusions: The telephone CPR acceptance rate of 62% in this study is comparable to those of other similar studies. Because bystanders’ physical condition is one of the keys to success, the rate may not improve as the population ages. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2010; 17:1012–1015 © 2010 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine     

Focused Training of Emergency Medicine Residents in Goal-directed Echocardiography: A Prospective Study

OBJECTIVES: To determine if a focused transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) training course would improve the accuracy of completion and interpretation of a goal-directed TTE by emergency medicine residents. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational, educational study of the impact of a focused training course on the change in physician performance on pre- and postcourse examinations testing competency in goal-directed TTE defined by five criteria: 1). image orientation, 2). anatomy identification, 3). chamber size grading, 4). ventricular function estimation, and 5). pericardial effusion identification. Subjects included were emergency medicine residents with between ten and 20 hours of noncardiac ultrasound didactics and between 20 and >150 proctored noncardiac ultrasound examinations. All underwent five hours of focused echocardiography didactics and one hour of proctored practical echocardiography training designed and implemented by an emergency physician ultrasound director and a cardiologist. Before the start of the training course, participants completed two examinations: 1) written 23-question test on the above concepts and 2) performance of a TTE on a healthy subject testing 16 elements that define a properly performed examination. After the training course, participants again completed both examinations. RESULTS: A total of 21 emergency medicine residents qualified for and underwent standardized testing and training. The percentage correct on the precourse written examination was 54% (95% CI = 50% to 59%), and the postcourse examination score was 76% (95% CI = 71% to 80%) (p < 0.005, paired t-test). The percentage correct on the precourse practical examination was 56% (95% CI = 51% to 60%), and the postcourse examination score was 94% (95% CI = 91% to 96%) (p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: A focused six-hour echocardiography training course significantly improved emergency medicine residents' percentage scores on both written and practical examinations testing essential components required for correct goal-directed TTE performance and interpretation.