CDK4/6 inhibition in early and metastatic breast cancer: A review

Breast cancer (BC) is responsible for 14% of cancer-related deaths in women [1]. Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors are a new class of selective drugs, offering an effective and tolerable treatment. CDK4/6 inhibitors induce cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase, and may thereby prevent tumour progression. Three CDK4/6 inhibitors have been tested in clinical BC trials: palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Commission (EMA) have approved palbociclib for the treatment of patients HR+ HER2- locally advanced or metastatic BC (aBC) in combination with an aromatase inhibitor as initial therapy in postmenopausal women or in combination with fulvestrant in women who have received prior endocrine therapy. Ribociclib has been approved by the FDA in combination with an aromatase inhibitor as initial therapy for postmenopausal women with HR+ HER2- aBC. Moreover, CDK4/6 inhibitors have shown promising results in the (neo)adjuvant setting. In this review, the principal completed and ongoing clinical trials in aBC are reviewed for both the metastatic as (neo)adjuvant setting. Tables will provide a complete overview of the ongoing clinical trials. At last, the future perspectives of these CDK4/6 inhibitors are discussed.     

Molecular mechanisms of resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer: A review

Deregulation of the cyclin D-CDK4/6-INK4-RB pathway leading to uncontrolled cell proliferation, is frequently observed in breast cancer. Currently, three selective CDK4/6 inhibitors have been FDA approved: palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib. Despite promising clinical outcomes, intrinsic or acquired resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors has limited the success of these treatments; therefore, the development of various strategies to overcome this resistance is of great importance. We highlight the various mechanisms that are directly or indirectly responsible for resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors, categorizing them into two broad groups; cell cycle-specific mechanisms and cell cycle-nonspecific mechanisms. Elucidation of the diverse mechanisms through which resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors occurs, may aid in the design of novel therapeutic strategies to improve patient outcomes. This review summarizes the currently available knowledge regarding mechanisms of resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors, and possible therapeutic strategies that may overcome this resistance as well.     

Comparison of treatment-related adverse events of different Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in metastatic breast cancer: A network meta-analysis

BackgroundPalbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib have all been approved in combination with endocrine therapy in hormone-receptor positive, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer. While the efficacy of these drugs appears similar, differences in safety and tolerability are apparent.MethodsWe searched PubMed and ASCO, ESMO and SABCS proceedings to identify randomized trials of palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib. Data on common and serious adverse events (AE) were extracted for each approved drug. The odds ratio for each AE and the hazard ratio for progression-free survival were calculated relative to endocrine therapy alone. A network meta-analysis was then performed for each endocrine therapy backbone (aromatase inhibitor (AI) or fulvestrant) to compare ribociclib and abemaciclib to palbociclib.Results8 trials were included in the analysis and comprised 2799 patients receiving cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors palbociclib: 873 patients; ribociclib: 1153 patients; abemaciclib: 773 patients. In 5 trials (1524 patients), the endocrine therapy backbone was an AI and in 3 trials (1275 patients) it was fulvestrant. Compared to palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib showed significantly lower grade 3–4 neutropenia, but significantly higher GI toxicity. Treatment discontinuation was higher with abemaciclib than other drugs. Efficacy of the 3 drugs was similar. Compared to palbociclib, for AI backbone, the HR for PFS for ribociclib was 0.98 and for abemaciclib 1.02. For fulvestrant backbone, the HR were 0.88 and 0.93 respectively.ConclusionsPalbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib have comparable efficacy, but differences in safety and tolerability. Abemaciclib has worse tolerability with significantly higher treatment discontinuation likely due to GI toxicity.     

Mechanisms of therapeutic CDK4/6 inhibition in breast cancer

Cyclin dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors have advanced the treatment of metastatic breast cancer by targeting the cell cycle machinery, interrupting intracellular and mitogenic hormone signals that stimulate proliferation of malignant cells. Preclinical evidence demonstrated that derangements of cyclin D1, CDK4/6, and retinoblastoma expression are common in breast cancer, and suggested a therapeutic benefit from interrupting this axis required for cell cycle progression. Studies of cell lines and animal models of breast cancer have demonstrated the complex interplay between the cell cycle and estrogen receptor and human epidermal growth receptor 2 signaling, which informs our understanding of synergistic use of CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy, as well as mechanisms of resistance to endocrine therapy. Interestingly, estrogen receptor activity leads to upregulation of cyclin D1 expression, but the estrogen receptor is also in turn activated by cyclin D1, independent of estrogen binding. Early CDK inhibitors were nonspecific and limited by systemic toxicities, while the current generation of CDK4/6 inhibitors have shown promise in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Preclinical investigations of the three CDK4/6 inhibitors approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib) lend further insight into their mechanism of action, which will hopefully inform the future use and refinement of these therapies. Finally, we summarize evidence for additional novel CDK4/6 inhibitors currently in development.     

Abemaciclib induces atypical cell death in cancer cells characterized by formation of cytoplasmic vacuoles derived from lysosomes

In the cell cycle, the G₁/S transition is controlled by the cyclin‐dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6‐cyclin D complex. Constitutive activation of CDK4/6 dysregulates G₁/S transition, leading to oncogenic transformation. We found that 3 CDK4/6 inhibitors, abemaciclib, ribociclib, and palbociclib, exerted a cytocidal effect as well as a cytostatic effect at the G₁ phase in cancer cell lines, including A549 human non–small cell lung cancer cells. Among these inhibitors, abemaciclib exhibited the most potent cytotoxic effect. The cell‐death phenotype induced by abemaciclib, which entailed formation of multiple cytoplasmic vacuoles, was not consistent with apoptosis or necroptosis. Abemaciclib blocked autophagic flux, resulting in accumulation of autophagosomes, however vacuole formation and cell death induced by abemaciclib were independent of autophagy. In addition, methuosis, a cell‐death phenotype characterized by vacuole formation induced by excessive macropinocytosis, was excluded because the vacuoles did not incorporate fluorescent dextran. Of note, both formation of vacuoles and induction of cell death in response to abemaciclib were inhibited by vacuolar‐type ATPase (V‐ATPase) inhibitors such as bafilomycin A1 and concanamycin A. Live‐cell imaging revealed that the abemaciclib‐induced vacuoles were derived from lysosomes that expanded following acidification. Transmission electron microscopy revealed that these vacuoles contained undigested debris and remnants of organelles. Cycloheximide chase assay revealed that lysosomal turnover was blocked by abemaciclib. Furthermore, mTORC1 inhibition along with partial lysosomal membrane permeabilization occurred after abemaciclib treatment. Together, these results indicate that, in cancer cells, abemaciclib induces a unique form of cell death accompanied by swollen and dysfunctional lysosomes.     

Racial disparities in neutrophil counts among patients with metastatic breast cancer during treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment - The three CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) approved for use in HR-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC), palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib,...     

Drug-drug interactions in breast cancer patients treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors

CDK4/6 inhibitors are a new class of anticancer drugs used for the treatment of women with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer with disease progression following endocrine therapy. Polypharmacy is a well-known problem in advanced cancer causing potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs), which, in turn, may limit the therapeutic value of CDK4/6 inhibitors. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms underlying potential DDIs in patients taking CDK4/6 inhibitors may be useful in decision-making processes and represent an important step towards treatment personalization. The present review is aimed at describing the potential DDIs that might occur in breast cancer patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitors based on direct evidence from the literature and mechanistic considerations tailored on specific class of drugs used in combination.     

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer: preliminary results and ongoing studies

The cyclin D-cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6-inhibitors (CDK4/6i) induce cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase what eventually can prevent the proliferation of cancer cells. The CDK4/6i have changed the landscape of treatment options for ER-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Currently, palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in this setting. This success encouraged the researchers to examine CDK4/6i activity in (neo)adjuvant setting. In this review, clinical data to date and ongoing clinical trials with palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib in the early breast cancer are discussed. A literature search of these topics was carried out using PubMed and data reported at international oncology meetings and clinicaltrials.gov were included. Currently, we have the early promising data from Phase II clinical trials of CDK4/6i efficacy in the neoadjuvant setting in women with HR-positive breast cancer. Moreover, there are numerous studies that are in progress today in (neo)adjuvant setting.     

Cyclin‐dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors suppress tumor growth in extramammary Paget’s disease

Extramammary Paget’s disease (EMPD) is a rare adnexal neoplasm commonly seen in the genital areas among the senior population. The prognosis of advanced EMPD is not favorable; thus, the development of potential treatments has long been sought. Cyclin‐dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors such as abemaciclib and palbociclib have been proven effective against metastatic breast cancer; however, no studies have addressed CDK4/6 inhibitors as an EMPD treatment. We herein examine the efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors against an EMPD patient‐derived xenograft (PDX) model. Abemaciclib (50 mg/kg/day) or palbociclib (120 mg/kg/day) was given orally to tumor‐bearing NOD/Scid mice over a 3‐week period. We also investigated the protein expression levels of CDK4/6 and cyclin D1 through immunohistochemical staining using EMPD clinical samples. Treatment with abemaciclib or palbociclib as a single agent was found to significantly suppress tumor growth in EMPD‐PDX. The Ki‐67‐positive ratio of the treated EMPD‐PDX tumors was significantly lower than that of the nontreated tumors. Clinically, the expression levels of CDK4 and cyclin D1 were significantly higher in the EMPD tumor cells than in the normal epidermis. Our results suggest that CDK4/6 inhibitors could be novel and potent therapeutics for the treatment of EMPD.     

HMGB1 is a key factor for tamoxifen resistance and has the potential to predict the efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in women. Hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer (HR + BC) is the most common pathological type of breast cancer, of which the main treatment method is endocrine therapy. Unfortunately, primary or acquired drug resistance greatly limits its efficacy. In recent years, the newly launched CDK4/6 inhibitors could effectively reverse endocrine resistance in breast cancer. However, considering their expensive price and side effects, it is particularly important to find out effective biomarkers and screen sensitive patients. Here, we found through bioinformatics analysis that high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) expression increased in endocrine-resistant HR + BC. In clinical specimens, the higher expression of HMGB1 was associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) for HR + BC patients with endocrine therapy after surgery. For endocrine-resistant breast cancer, compared with HMGB1-negative patients, HMGB1-positive patients who received CDK4/6 inhibitors treatment benefited more in PFS. Moreover, we demonstrated that HMGB1 promoted tamoxifen resistance by combining with the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and activating nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) pathway. CDK4/6 inhibitors could downregulate the expression of HMGB1 and suppress the TLR4-NF-κB pathway, and in turn reverse tamoxifen resistance. These results illuminated the critical role of HMGB1 in the process of tamoxifen resistance, explained the mechanism of CDK4/6 inhibitors reversing tamoxifen resistance, and suggested the feasibility of HMGB1 as a potential biomarker for screening sensitive patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitors.     

CDK4/6-Inhibitoren beim Mammakarzinom

The cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 inhibitors palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib have demonstrated significant improvements in progression-free survival in numerous clinical trials in metastasized hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer. Since palbociclib and ribociclib were approved in Germany, CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with antihormonal therapy have been a standard treatment in first- and also in second-line therapy. Abemaciclib, the third CDK4/6, inhibitor will be approved in Germany this year. Side effects, particularly neutropenia, are well managed in daily routine by dose reductions and dose interruptions. The necessary intensive treatment monitoring has to be adhered to precisely, in order to administer treatment in the form of a well-tolerated maintenance therapy. Several clinical trials in the neo-/adjuvant setting are currently in progress, in order to transfer the survival advantage from the metastasized situation into early breast cancer. The aim of this article is to elucidate the mode of action, efficacy, and side effects of the CDK4/6 inhibitors, and to put them in a current clinical context.     

Identification of Smurf2 as a HIF-1α degrading E3 ubiquitin ligase

The major adaptive response to hypoxia involves hypoxia-inducible factor HIF-1α which is regulated by von Hippel Lindau (VHL) E3 ligase. We previously observed a stabilization of HIF-1α by cyclin-dependent kinases CDK1 and CDK4/6 that is independent of VHL, hypoxia or p53, and found that CDK4/6 inhibitors destabilize HIF-1α under normoxia and hypoxia. To further investigate the molecular mechanism of HIF-1α destabilization by CDK1 or CDK4/6 inhibitors, we performed a proteomic screen on immunoprecipitated HIF-1α from hypoxic colorectal cancer cells that were either untreated or treated with CDK1 inhibitor Ro3306 and CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib. Our proteomics screen identified a number of candidates that were enriched in palbociclib-treated hypoxic cells including SMAD specific E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 2 (Smurf2). We also identified a HIF-1α peptide that appeared to be differentially phosphorylated after palbociclib treatment. Gene knockdown of SMURF2 increased basal expression of HIF-1α even in the presence of Ro3306 or two different CDK4/6 inhibitors, palbociclib and abemaciclib. Overexpression of Smurf2 inhibited expression of HIF-1α and enhanced HIF-1α ubiquitination in normoxia. Proteasome inhibitor MG-132 partially rescued HIF-1α expression when Smurf2 was overexpressed. Smurf2 overexpression also inhibited HIF-1α expression level in two other cell lines, SW480 and VHL-deficient RCC4. Overexpression of SMURF2 mRNA is correlated with improved disease-free survival and overall survival in clear cell renal cell cancer. Our results unravel a previously unknown mechanism involving Smurf2 for HIF-1α destabilization in CDK4/6 inhibitor-treated cells, thereby shedding light on VHL-independent HIF-1α regulation.     

CDK4/6抑制剂在激素受体阳性进展期乳腺癌治疗中的研究进展

内分泌治疗因其兼具良好的疗效及安全性,是激素受体阳性进展期乳腺癌患者的重要治疗手段。近年来内分泌领域进展迅速,很多新型药物相继出现,其中包括多种可以逆转或延迟内分泌耐药的周期蛋白依赖性激酶(cyclin-dependent kinase,CDK)4/6抑制剂。CDK4/6抑制剂联合内分泌治疗可为激素受体阳性进展期乳腺癌患者带来生存获益、延迟至化疗时间,正逐渐改变国内外激素受体阳性进展期乳腺癌的治疗模式。本文将就CDK4/6抑制剂在激素受体阳性进展期乳腺癌中的治疗进展进行综述。     

CDK inhibitors in cancer therapy,an overview of recent development

Dysregulated cell division, which leads to aberrant cell proliferation, is one of the key hallmarks of cancer. Therefore, therapeutic targets that block cell division would be effective for cancer treatment. Cell division is mainly controlled by a complex composed of cyclin and cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs). To date, the CDK inhibitors (CDKIs), specifically the ones that block the enzyme activity of CDK4 and CDK6 (CDK4/6), have been approved by FDA for the treatment of metastatic hormone receptor positive breast cancer. However, due to the non-selectivity and significant toxicity, most of the first generation CDK inhibitors (so called pan-CDK inhibitors that target several CDKs), have not been approved for clinical application. Despite this, great efforts and progress have been made to enable pan-CDK inhibitors application in the clinical setting. Notably, the development of combination therapy strategies in recent years has made it possible to reduce the toxicity and side effects of pan-CDK inhibitors. Thus, as a combination therapy approach, pan-CDK inhibitors regain great potential in clinical application. In this review, we introduced the CDK family members and discussed their major functions in cell cycle controlling. Then, we summarized the research progress regarding CDK inhibitors, especially those other than CDK4/6 inhibitors. We reviewed first-generation pan-CDKIs Flavopiridol and Roscovitine, and second-generation CDKIs Dinaciclib, P276-00, AT7519, TG02, Roniciclib, RGB-286638 by focusing on their developing stages, clinical trials and targeting cancers. The specific CDKIs, which targets to increase specificity and decrease the side effects, were also discussed. These CDKIs include CDK4/6, CDK7, CDK9, and CDK12/13 inhibitors. Finally, the efficacy and discrepancy of combination therapy with CDK inhibitors and PD1/PDL1 antibodies were analyzed, which might give insights into the development of promising strategy for cancer treatment.     

Therapy after cyclin-dependent kinase inhibition in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: Resistance mechanisms and novel treatment strategies

Endocrine therapy has been the standard of care for patients with metastatic hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer since the 1970s, improving survival while avoiding the toxicities associated with cytotoxic chemotherapy. However, all HR-positive tumors ultimately develop resistance to endocrine therapy. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors have more recently become an important component of the management of this breast cancer subtype, significantly delaying time to the disease progression and improving survival when combined with endocrine therapy. However, as with endocrine therapy alone, treatment resistance remains a universal phenomenon. As more women receive CDK4/6 inhibitors as part of their treatment, the management of de novo and acquired resistance to combined CDK4/CDK6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy regimens has emerged as an important clinical challenge. Several resistance mechanisms have been described, including alterations in the CDK4/6/cyclin D complex or its major effector retinoblastoma protein (pRb), bypass signaling through other cyclin/CDK complexes and activation of upstream signaling pathways, in particular the PI3K/mTOR pathway, but robust biomarkers to predict resistance remain elusive, and the role for continuing CDK4/6 inhibitors after progression remains under investigation. Novel strategies being evaluated in clinical trials include the continuation of CDK4/6 inhibitors through progression, as well as triplet therapy combinations with PI3K inhibitors or immune checkpoint inhibitors.     

CDK4/6抑制剂的联合治疗模式

 细胞周期素依赖激酶（CDKs）抑制剂联合内分泌治疗已经用于晚期乳腺癌的治疗。除了内分泌治疗，CDK4/6抑制剂还可以联合表皮生长因子受体（EGFR）抑制剂、磷脂酰肌醇-3激酶（PI3K）/哺乳动物雷帕霉素靶蛋白（mTOR）抑制剂、化学治疗、免疫治疗、分子靶向治疗和其他治疗。联合治疗模式克服了CDK4/6抑制剂的耐药并提高了临床疗效，开启了肿瘤精准治疗的一扇新窗口。     

Limited clinical activity of palbociclib and ribociclib monotherapy in advanced cancers with cyclin D-CDK4/6 pathway alterations in the Dutch DRUP and Australian MoST trials

The Dutch Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP) and the Australian Cancer Molecular Screening and Therapeutic (MoST) Program are similar nonrandomized, multidrug, pan-cancer trial platforms that aim to identify signals of clinical activity of molecularly matched targeted therapies or immunotherapies outside their approved indications. Here, we report results for advanced or metastatic cancer patients with tumors harboring cyclin D-CDK4/6 pathway alterations treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors palbociclib or ribociclib. We included adult patients that had therapy-refractory solid malignancies with the following alterations: amplifications of CDK4, CDK6, CCND1, CCND2 or CCND3, or complete loss of CDKN2A or SMARCA4. Within MoST, all patients were treated with palbociclib, whereas in DRUP, palbociclib and ribociclib were assigned to different cohorts (defined by tumor type and alteration). The primary endpoint for this combined analysis was clinical benefit, defined as confirmed objective response or stable disease ≥16 weeks. We treated 139 patients with a broad variety of tumor types; 116 with palbociclib and 23 with ribociclib. In 112 evaluable patients, the objective response rate was 0% and clinical benefit rate at 16 weeks was 15%. Median progression-free survival was 4 months (95% CI: 3-5 months), and median overall survival 5 months (95% CI: 4-6 months). In conclusion, only limited clinical activity of palbociclib and ribociclib monotherapy in patients with pretreated cancers harboring cyclin D-CDK4/6 pathway alterations was observed. Our findings indicate that monotherapy use of palbociclib or ribociclib is not recommended and that merging data of two similar precision oncology trials is feasible.     

The implementation of CDK 4/6 inhibitors and its impact on treatment choices in HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer patients: A study of the Dutch SONABRE Registry

In August 2017, cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy have been reimbursed in the Netherlands for patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+), HER2 negative (HER2?) advanced breast cancer (ABC). This study evaluates the implementation of CDK4/6 inhibitors and changes in treatment choices in the Netherlands. All patients diagnosed with HR+/HER2? ABC in 2009 to 2018 in seven hospitals were selected from the Southeast Netherlands Advanced Breast cancer (SONABRE) registry. The 2-year cumulative use of CDK4/6 inhibitors since reimbursement date (August 2017) was assessed using competing-risk methodology in two cohorts. The first cohort included patients with ABC diagnosis between August 2017 and December 2018. The second cohort included patients with ABC diagnosis between 2009 and August 2017, and still alive on August 1, 2017. In addition, treatment choices in the first three lines of therapy in calendar years 2009 to 2018 were evaluated for the total study population. Among patients diagnosed since August 2017 (n = 214), 50% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 43-57) received CDK4/6 inhibitors within 2 years beyond diagnosis. Of eligible patients diagnosed before August 2017 (n = 417), 31% (95% CI = 27-36) received CDK4/6 inhibitors within 2 years following reimbursement. Another 20% of both cohorts are still CDK4/6 inhibitor naïve and on first-line therapy. The use of chemotherapy decreased in first two lines of therapy between 2009 and 2018 (first-line: 29%-13%; second-line: 26%-19%). The implementation rate of CDK4/6 inhibitors since reimbursement is currently 50% within 2 years beyond diagnosis and is expected to increase further. The implementation of targeted therapy decreased the use of chemotherapy as first-line therapy.     

First-Line Treatment for Endocrine-Sensitive Bone-Only Metastatic Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

In the last decade, several clinical trials have investigated novel endocrine combinations for the first-line treatment of hormone receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer. Nevertheless, the use of combinations for the first-line treatment of bone-only disease is widely discussed as a result of its indolent natural history. We performed a comprehensive search of phase 3 randomized clinical trials published in the literature through September 2018. Our aim was to explore the role of the new endocrine approaches in bone-only metastatic breast cancer, suggesting a possible strategy for their selection. In particular, we evaluated the comparative risk of adverse event occurrence during these treatments. A total of 6 studies were deemed suitable for meta-analysis: the Monaleesa-2, Monaleesa-7, Monarch-3, Paloma-2, SWOG, and Alliance trials. Overall, the novel strategies were shown to improve progression-free survival in bone-only disease (hazard ratio = 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.86; P = .003). Combinations with cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors improved progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.75; P < .001) with an acceptable toxicity profile. Abemaciclib was associated with increased anemia and gastrointestinal toxicity (especially diarrhea), whereas palbociclib was associated with increased leukopenia (but not neutropenia) compared to the other compounds. Increased aspartate aminotransferase levels were reported for both ribociclib and abemaciclib. The combination of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors and endocrine therapy represents an effective and well-tolerated approach for first-line treatment in bone-only disease settings. Because no direct comparison between the 3 cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors is available, the selection of the most appropriate treatment should be based on toxicity profile as well as patient preference and copathologies.