Efficacy of a new bivalent vaccine of porcine circovirus type 2 and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (Fostera™ PCV MH) under experimental conditions

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a new bivalent vaccine (Fostera™ PCV MH, Zoetis) of porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in growing pigs under experimental conditions. A total of 80 pigs were randomly divided into 8 groups (10 pigs per group). The pigs were administered the bivalent vaccine intramuscularly as a 2.0 mL dose at 21 days of age based on the manufacturer's instructions. Three weeks after vaccination, the pigs were inoculated with either PCV2 (intranasal route) or M. hyopneumoniae (intratracheal route) or both. Regardless of the type of inoculation, vaccinated pigs after challenge exhibited effective reduction of clinical signs, PCV2 viremia levels and mycoplasma nasal shedding, and lung and lymphoid lesion when compared to unvaccinated challenged pigs. Vaccinated challenged pigs had significantly higher (P < 0.05) levels of PCV2-specific neutralizing antibodies, and numbers of PCV2-and M. hyopneumoniae-specific interferon-γ secreting cells compared to unvaccinated challenged pigs. This study demonstrates that the bivalent vaccine is able to protect pigs against either PCV2 or M. hyopneumoniae infection or both based on clinical, microbiological, immunological, and pathological evaluation.     

A single blind randomized phase 3 study to evaluate safety and immunogenicity of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (HAPIBEVTM) in 1-15 years-old healthy hepatitis A vaccine-naïve children

The Biological E inactivated hepatitis A (HAPIBEV™) vaccine was developed by importing the Healive® vaccine bulk from China and fill-finish it in India. Healive® vaccine is approved in China for both children and adults. This study assessed the safety and immunogenicity of HAPIBEV™ vaccine as compared to the Havrix 720® vaccine of GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) pharmaceuticals when administered intramuscularly (IM) 6 months apart in 1–15 years old hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccine naive children in India.This Phase 3, single blind, parallel, randomized, active-controlled, two-arm study was conducted at 8 centers in India in healthy HAV vaccine–naive children. Subjects were stratified into 2 age subsets (1–7 and 8–15 years) and randomly assigned to either BE-HAPIBEV™ or GSK’s Havrix® vaccine and administered 2 IM injections 6 months apart. The immunogenicity evaluations included: (1) proportion of subjects who achieved the following at Day 210 from baseline: (a) seroconversion (≥20 mIU/mL) with anti-HAV immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies, (b) ≥4-fold increase in anti-HAV IgG antibodies, and (c) ≥2-fold increase in anti-HAV IgG antibodies concentration who were already seroconverted at baseline and (2) geometric mean concentrations (GMC) of anti-HAV IgG antibodies at baseline and Day 210. Safety was evaluated throughout the study.A total of 467 (89.8%) subjects completed the study. The non-inferiority criterion was met by HAPIBEV™ vaccine as seroconversion rates in both vaccine groups were 100%. Overall, other immunogenicity evaluations were either similar in both vaccine groups or higher in the HAPIBEV™ group compared with the Havrix® group. The safety profile was also comparable between HAPIBEV™ and Havrix® groups. The most common adverse event (AE) was injection site pain, and the majority of AEs were mild in severity. The HAPIBEV™ vaccine demonstrated an immunological and safety profile on par with Havrix® in 1–15 years old healthy HAV vaccine-naive Indian children.This study is registered with clinical trial registry of India bearing no: CTRI/2019/04/018384 on 02 Apr 2019.     

Immunogenicity of an adjuvanted SARS-CoV-2 trimeric S-protein subunit vaccine (SCB-2019) in SARS-CoV-2-naïve and exposed individuals in a phase 2/3, double-blind,randomized study

BackgroundWe evaluated immunogenicity of SCB-2019, a subunit vaccine candidate containing a pre-fusion trimeric form of the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S)-protein adjuvanted with CpG-1018/alum.MethodsThe phase 2/3, double-blind, randomized SPECTRA trial was conducted in five countries in participants aged ≥ 18 years, either SARS-CoV-2-naïve or previously exposed. Participants were randomly assigned to receive two doses of SCB-2019 or placebo administered intramuscularly 21 days apart. In the phase 2 part of the study, on days 1, 22, and 36, neutralizing antibodies were measured by pseudovirus and wild-type virus neutralization assays to SARS-CoV-2 prototype and variants, and ACE2-receptor-binding antibodies and SCB-2019–binding antibodies were measured by ELISA. Cell-mediated immunity was measured by intracellular cytokine staining via flow cytometry.Results1601 individuals were enrolled between 24 March and 13 September 2021 and received at least one vaccine dose. Immunogenicity analysis was conducted in a phase 2 subset of 691 participants, including 428 SARS-CoV-2-naïve (381 vaccine and 47 placebo recipients) and 263 SARS-CoV-2-exposed (235 vaccine and 28 placebo recipients). In SARS-CoV-2-naïve participants, GMTs of neutralizing antibodies against prototype virus increased 2 weeks post-second dose (day 36) compared to baseline (224 vs 12.7 IU/mL). Seroconversion rate was 82.5 %. In SARS-CoV-2-exposed participants, one SCB-2019 dose increased GMT of neutralizing antibodies by 48.3-fold (1276.1 IU/mL on day 22) compared to baseline. Seroconversion rate was 92.4 %. Increase was marginal post-second dose. SCB-2019 also showed cross-neutralization capability against nine variants, including Omicron, in SARS-CoV-2-exposed participants at day 36. SCB-2019 stimulated Th1-biased cell-mediated immunity to the S-protein in both naïve and exposed participants. The vaccine was well tolerated, no safety concerns were raised from the study.ConclusionsA single dose of SCB-2019 was immunogenic in SARS-CoV-2-exposed individuals, whereas two doses were required to induce immune response in SARS-CoV-2-naïve individuals. SCB-2019 elicited a cross-neutralizing response against emergent SARS-CoV-2 variants at antibody levels associated with clinical protection, underlining its potential as a booster.Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04672395; EudraCT: 2020-004272-17.     

Immunogenicity and safety of fully liquid DTaP₅-IPV-Hib compared with DTaP₃-IPV/Hib when both coadministered with a heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) at 2, 3, 4, and 12 to 18 months of age: a phase III, single-blind, randomised, controlled, multicentre study

This study compared immunogenicity and safety of DTaP₅-IPV-Hib to DTaP₃-IPV/Hib coadministered with PCV7 at 2, 3, and 4 months (primary series) and a fourth-dose booster at 12-18 months of age. Seroprotection rates for DTaP₅-IPV-Hib were high (noninferior to DTaP₃-IPV/Hib for the primary series) for antigens common to both vaccines and PCV7 antigens. Geometric mean concentration (GMC) for Hib antibodies were higher in the DTaP₅-IPV-Hib group than the DTaP₃-IPV/Hib group after the primary series and booster dose; GMCs or titers for other antigens were generally similar between groups after the primary series and booster dose. Safety profiles were similar between groups.