Immunogenicity and safety of a fully liquid aluminum phosphate adjuvanted Haemophilus influenzae type b PRP-CRM197-conjugate vaccine in healthy Japanese children: A phase III,randomized, observer-blind,multicenter, parallel-group study

BackgroundBroad use of monovalent Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) conjugate vaccines based on the capsular polysaccharide polyribosyl-ribitol phosphate (PRP), has significantly reduced invasive Hib disease burden in children worldwide, particularly in children aged <1 year. In Japan, PRP conjugated to tetanus toxoid (PRP-T) vaccine has been widely used since the initiation of public funding programs followed by a routine vaccination designation in 2013.MethodsWe compared the immunogenicity and safety of PRP conjugated to a non-toxic diphtheria toxin mutant (PRP-CRM₁₉₇) vaccine with the PRP-T vaccine when administered subcutaneously to healthy Japanese children in a phase III study. Additionally, we evaluated the immunogenicity and safety profiles of a diphtheria–tetanus acellular pertussis (DTaP) combination vaccine when concomitantly administered with either PRP-CRM₁₉₇ or PRP-T vaccines. The primary endpoint was the “long-term seroprotection rate”, defined as the group proportion with anti-PRP antibody titers ⩾1.0 μg/mL, after the primary series.ResultsLong-term seroprotection rates were 99.3% in the PRP-CRM₁₉₇ group and 95.6% in the PRP-T group. The intergroup difference (PRP-CRM₁₉₇ group – PRP-T group) was 3.7% (95% confidence interval: 0.099–7.336), demonstrating that PRP-CRM₁₉₇ vaccine was non-inferior to PRP-T vaccine (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the “short-term seroprotection rate” (anti-PRP antibody titer ⩾0.15 μg/mL) before booster vaccination was higher in the PRP-CRM₁₉₇ group than in PRP-T. Concomitant administration of PRP-CRM₁₉₇ vaccine with DTaP vaccine showed no differences in terms of immunogenicity compared with concomitant vaccination with PRP-T vaccine and DTaP vaccine. Although CRM₁₉₇ vaccine had higher local reactogenicity, overall, both Hib vaccines had acceptable safety and tolerability profiles.ConclusionThe immunogenicity of PRP-CRM₁₉₇ vaccine administered subcutaneously as a three-dose primary series in children followed by a booster vaccination 1 year after the primary series induced protective levels of Hib antibodies with no safety or tolerability concerns.Clinical trial registry: Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01379846     

Lasting immune memory against hepatitis B following challenge 10–11 years after primary vaccination with either three doses of hexavalent DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib or monovalent hepatitis B vaccine at 3, 5 and 11–12 months of age

BackgroundThe combined hexavalent diphtheria–tetanus–pertussis–hepatitis B-inactivated poliomyelitis – Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine (Infanrix hexa™; DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib: GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines) induces robust responses to the HBV component when administered at 3, 5 and 11–12 months of age. We assessed long term HBV antibody persistence 10–11 years after primary vaccination in infancy.MethodsAntibody persistence and immune memory were assessed post-primary vaccination at 3, 5, 11–12 months with DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib, or monovalent HBV vaccine (Engerix™ B, GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines) co-administered with DTPa-IPV/Hib (Infanrix™-IPV/Hib, GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines) in 185 children aged 11–12 years. Blood samples were collected before and 1 month after a challenge dose of Engerix™ B (10 μg dose).Results10–11 years after primary vaccination the percentage of subjects with persisting anti-HBs antibody concentrations ≥10 mIU/ml was 48.4% in the DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib group and 58.4% in the DTPa-IPV/Hib + HBV group. After the HBV challenge dose, the percentage with anti-HBs ≥100 mIU/ml increased from 14.7% to 93.6% in the DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib group and 19.1% to 94.4% in the DTPa-IPV/Hib + HBV group. Anti-HBs GMCs increased by at least 187-fold in each group. An anamnestic response (≥4-fold increase in initially seropositive or anti-HBs concentration ≥10 mIU/ml in initially seronegative subjects) was observed in 96.8% and 96.6% of subjects in the DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib and DTPa-IPV/Hib + HBV groups, respectively. No serious adverse events occurred that were considered related to challenge vaccination.ConclusionAdministration of HBV as part of a combination vaccine or as a monovalent vaccine induced long lasting immune memory against HBV in children primed at 3, 5 and 11 months of age. Antibody persistence and immune memory were similar, suggesting that protection afforded by DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib and monovalent HBV vaccines, is likely to be of similar duration. The administration of HBV challenge dose 10–11 years after the 3, 5, 11–12 months primary schedule induced strong anamnestic responses and was well tolerated.This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01138098.     

Post-licensure,phase IV,safety study of a live attenuated Japanese encephalitis recombinant vaccine in children in Thailand

BackgroundJapanese encephalitis is a mosquito-borne viral disease endemic in most countries in Asia. A recombinant live, attenuated Japanese encephalitis virus vaccine, JE-CV, is licensed in 14 countries, including Thailand, for the prevention of Japanese encephalitis in adults and children.MethodsThis was a prospective, phase IV, open-label, multicentre, safety study of JE-CV conducted from November 2013 to April 2015, to evaluate rare serious adverse events (AEs). JE-CV was administered to 10,000 healthy children aged 9 months to <5 years in Thailand as a primary (Group 1) or booster (Group 2) vaccination. Serious AEs (SAEs), including AEs of special interest, up to 60 days after administration were evaluated. Immediate Grade 3 systemic AEs up to 30 min after JE-CV administration were also described.ResultsThe median age of participants was 1.1 years in Group 1 and 3.8 years in Group 2. SAEs were reported in 204 (3.0%) participants in Group 1 and 59 (1.9%) participants in Group 2. Among a total of 294 SAEs in 263 participants, only three events occurring in two participants were considered related to vaccination. All three cases were moderate urticaria, none of which met the definition of AEs of special interest for hypersensitivity. AEs of special interest were reported in 28 (0.4%) participants in Group 1 and 4 (0.1%) participants in Group 2; none were considered related to vaccination. Febrile convulsion was the most frequently reported AE of special interest: 25 (0.4%) participants in Group 1; and 2 (<0.1%) in Group 2. There were no cases of Japanese encephalitis reported. No Grade 3 immediate systemic AEs were reported after any JE-CV vaccination.ConclusionsOur study did not identify any new safety concerns with JE-CV and confirms its good safety profile.This study was registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01981967; Universal Trial Number: U1111-1127-7052).     

Immunogenicity and safety of concomitant administration of meningococcal serogroup B (4CMenB) and serogroup C (MenC-CRM) vaccines in infants: A phase 3b,randomized controlled trial

BackgroundAfter implementation of routine infant MenC vaccination, MenB remains a serious cause of meningococcal disease, yet to be targeted by vaccination programs in several countries. This study (NCT01339923) investigated the immunogenicity and safety of MenC CRM-conjugated vaccine (MenC-CRM) concomitantly administered with MenB vaccine (4CMenB).MethodsInfants (N = 251) were randomised 1:1 to receive 4CMenB and MenC-CRM (Group 1) or MenC-CRM alone (Group 2) at 3 and 5 months (M3, M5) and a booster at 12 months of age (M12), and pneumococcal vaccine at M3, M5, M7, M12. Antibody responses to meningococcal vaccines were measured at M3, M6, M12, and M13. Non-inferiority of MenC-CRM response in Group 1 vs Group 2 was demonstrated at M6 and M13, if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (LL95%CI) of the difference in percentage of infants with hSBA titres ≥1:8 was >−10%. Sufficiency of MenB response was achieved if LL95%CI of the percentage of infants with hSBA titres ≥1:4 against fHbp, NadA and PorA strains was ≥70% at M6 or ≥75% at M13. Adverse events (AEs) were collected for 7 days post-vaccination, and serious AEs (SAEs) and medically attended AEs throughout the study.ResultsNon-inferiority of MenC response in Group 1 vs Group 2 (LL95%CI −6.4% [M6]; −5.2% [M13]) and sufficiency of MenB response in Group 1 (LL95%CI 92%, 90%, 89% [M6]; 97%, 92%, 93% [M13] against fHbp, NadA, PorA, respectively) were demonstrated. Higher rates of mild to moderate solicited AEs were reported in Group 1. Unsolicited AEs and SAEs incidences were similar across groups.ConclusionsConcomitant administration of MenC-CRM and 4CMenB in infants was immunogenic, resulting in non-inferior responses against MenC compared to MenC-CRM alone and demonstration of sufficient immune response to MenB, after primary and booster vaccination. Reactogenicity was higher for concomitant vaccines administration, but no safety concerns were identified.     

Efficacy and safety of a pentavalent live human-bovine reassortant rotavirus vaccine (RV5) in healthy Chinese infants: A randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled trial

BackgroundA randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial was conducted in healthy Chinese infants to assess the efficacy and safety of a pentavalent live human-bovine reassortant rotavirus vaccine (RotaTeq™, RV5) against rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE).Methods4040 participants aged 6–12 weeks were enrolled and randomly assigned to either 3 oral doses of RV5 (n = 2020) or placebo (n = 2020), administered ∼4 weeks apart. The participants also received OPV and DTaP in a concomitant or staggered fashion. The primary objective was to evaluate vaccine efficacy (VE) against naturally-occurring RVGE at least 14 days following the third dose. Key secondary objectives included: VE against naturally-occurring severe RVGE and VE against severe and any-severity RVGE caused by rotavirus serotypes contained in the vaccine, occurring at least 14 days after the third dose. All adverse events (AEs) were collected for 30 days following each dose. Serious AEs (SAEs) and intussusception cases were collected during the entire study. (ClinicalTrials.gov registry: NCT02062385).ResultsVE against RVGE of any-severity caused by any serotype was 69.3% (95% CI: 54.5, 79.7). The secondary efficacy analysis showed an efficacy of: 78.9% (95% CI: 59.1, 90.1) against severe RVGE caused by any serotype; 69.9% (95% CI: 55.2, 80.3) and 78.9% (95% CI: 59.1, 90.1) against any-severity and severe RVGE caused by serotypes contained in the vaccine, respectively. Within 30 days following any vaccination, 53.5% (1079/2015) and 53.3% (1077/2019) of participants reported at least one AE, and 5.8% (116/2015) and 5.7% (116/2019) reported SAEs in the vaccine and placebo groups, respectively. No SAEs were considered vaccine-related in recipients of RV5. Two intussusception cases were reported in recipients of RV5 who recovered after receiving treatment. Neither was considered vaccine-related.ConclusionsIn Chinese infants, RV5 was efficacious against any-severity and severe RVGE caused by any serotype and generally well-tolerated with respect to AEs.     

A phase 3, randomized,active-controlled study to assess the safety and tolerability of meningococcal serogroup B vaccine bivalent rLP2086 in healthy adolescents and young adults

BackgroundNeisseria meningitidis serogroup B (MnB) is an important cause of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD). A MnB vaccine (bivalent rLP2086, Trumenba^®) consisting of 2 factor H binding protein variants received accelerated approval in the United States for the prevention of IMD caused by MnB in individuals 10–25 years of age. This randomized, active-controlled, observer-blind study further assessed the safety and tolerability of bivalent rLP2086.MethodsEligible subjects ≥10 to <26 years were randomized (2:1) to receive bivalent rLP2086 at months 0, 2, and 6, or hepatitis A virus vaccine (HAV, Havrix^®) at months 0 and 6, and saline at month 2. The primary endpoints were serious adverse events (SAEs) throughout the study and medically-attended adverse events (MAEs) within 30 days after vaccination. Additional safety assessments included SAEs at other study intervals and adverse events (AEs) during the vaccination phase.ResultsOf 5712 subjects randomized, 84.6% (n = 3219) of bivalent rLP2086 recipients and 87.2% (n = 1663) of HAV/saline recipients completed the study. Throughout the study, SAEs were reported for 1.6% and 2.5% of bivalent rLP2086 and HAV/saline recipients, respectively. SAEs related to either vaccine were rare. MAEs occurred in 7.0% and 6.1% of subjects after vaccination 1; 5.5% and 6.1% after vaccination 2; and 5.3% and 5.5% after vaccination 3 in the bivalent rLP2086 and HAV/saline groups, respectively. A greater proportion of subjects reported AEs during the vaccination phase after bivalent rLP2086 compared with HAV/saline recipients; however, when reactogenicity events were excluded, the proportion between groups was similar.ConclusionThis safety study, the largest randomized, active-controlled trial evaluating a recombinant MnB vaccine, demonstrated that bivalent rLP2086 is safe and tolerable in healthy individuals ≥10 to <26 years of age.     

The immunogenicity and safety of a tetravalent measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine when co-administered with conjugated meningococcal C vaccine to healthy children: A phase IIIb,randomized, multi-center study in Italy

IntroductionMultiple vaccination visits and administrations can be stressful for infants, parents and healthcare providers. Multivalent combination vaccines can deliver the required number of antigens in fewer injections and clinic visits, while vaccine co-administration can also reduce the number of visits. This non-inferiority study was undertaken to evaluate the feasibility of co-administering a combined measles-mumps-rubella-varicella (MMRV) vaccine with conjugated meningococcal C (MenC) vaccine in a large cohort of healthy Italian toddlers.MethodsHealthy subjects aged 13–15 months were randomized (2:1:1) to receive single doses of either: co-administered MMRV + MenC at the same visit (MMRV + MenC group); or MMRV followed 42 days later by MenC (MMRV group); or MenC followed 42 days later by MMRV (MenC group). Blood samples were collected before and 43 days after vaccination. Antibody titers against MMRV were measured using ELISA. Functional-anti-meningococcal-serogroup activity (rSBAMenC) was assessed using a serum bactericidal test. Solicited local and general reactions were recorded for up to 4 and 42 days post-vaccination, respectively. Non-inferiority of MMRV + MenC to MMRV (post-dose-1 seroconversion rates) and MMRV + MenC to MenC (post-dose-1 seroprotection rates) was achieved if the lower limit (LL) of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the group difference was ⩾−10% for each antigen.Results716 subjects were enrolled in the study. At 42 days post-vaccination, the MMRV seroconversion rates were 99.3% (measles), 94.5% (mumps), 100% (rubella) and 99.7% (varicella) in the MMRV + MenC group, and 99.4%, 93.2%, 100% and 100%, respectively, in the MMRV group. The seroprotection rates against rSBA-MenC were 98.3% in the MMRV + MenC group and 99.3% in the MenC group. Non-inferiority was reached for all the vaccine antigens. The safety profiles were as expected for these vaccines.ConclusionThe immune responses elicited by co-administered MMRV + MenC were non-inferior to those elicited by MMRV or MenC alone and support vaccination of children with both vaccines at a single visit.Clinical Trials registration: NCT01506193.     

Hexavalent vaccines: What can we learn from head-to-head studies?

BackgroundThree hexavalent vaccines against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis, hepatitis B virus (HBV), and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) are licensed in Europe: Infanrix hexa (DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib), Hexyon (DT2aP-HBV-IPV-Hib) and Vaxelis (DT5aP-HBV-IPV-Hib).MethodsA systematic literature search was performed in various electronic databases to identify published peer-reviewed head-to-head studies comparing any licensed hexavalent vaccine to another.ResultsPredefined inclusion criteria were met by 12 articles. Individual studies concluded that the 3 hexavalent vaccines have acceptable safety profiles although some significant differences were observed in their reactogenicity profiles. The immunogenicity of DT2aP-HBV-IPV-Hib and DT5aP-HBV-IPV-Hib was non-inferior versus DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib. Some differences in immune responses to common antigens were observed, but their clinical relevance was not established. Anti-filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA) from pertussis and anti-polyribosylribitol phosphate (PRP) from Hib antibody concentrations tended to be higher, and anti-HBV and anti-pertussis toxin (PT) from pertussis antibody concentrations lower in DT2aP-HBV-IPV-Hib versus DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccinees. Anti-PT and post-primary anti-PRP antibody concentrations tended to be higher, and anti-HBV, anti-FHA, anti-pertactin from pertussis and post-booster anti-PRP antibody concentrations lower in DT5aP-HBV-IPV-Hib versus DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib recipients. Slightly lower immune responses towards most vaccine antigens were observed with 2 + 1 versus 3 + 1 schedules post-primary vaccination, suggesting that 2 + 1 schedules should only be considered in countries with very high vaccination coverage.ConclusionAlthough the licensed hexavalent vaccines are generally considered similar, analyses of immunogenicity data from head-to-head trials highlighted differences that could be related to differences in composition and formulation. In addition, the demonstrated non-inferiority of the immunogenicity of the more recent vaccines versus DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib does not allow a full bridging to similar efficacy, effectiveness and safety. The availability of DT3aP-HBV-IPV/Hib over > 20 years allowed to collect a wealth of data on its long-term immunogenicity, safety and effectiveness in clinical and post-marketing studies, and makes it a key pillar of pediatric immunization.     

Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of Infanrix™ when co-administered with meningococcal MenACWY-TT conjugate vaccine in toddlers primed with MenHibrix™ and Pediarix™

BackgroundCo-administration of an investigational quadrivalent meningococcal serogroups A, C, W and Y tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine (MenACWY-TT) with the fourth dose of diphtheria–tetanus–acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP) at age 15–18 months was investigated in 3-dose Haemophilus influenzae type b-meningococcal serogroups C/Y conjugate vaccine (HibMenCY-TT)-primed toddlers.MethodsInfants were randomized (5:1) and primed at 2, 4 and 6 months of age with HibMenCY-TT and DTaP-hepatitis B-inactivated poliovirus (DTaP-HBV-IPV) vaccine, or Hib-TT and DTaP-HBV-IPV (Control). HibMenCY-TT+ DTaP-HBV-IPV vaccinees were re-randomized (2:2:1) to receive MenACWY-TT at 12–15 months and DTaP at 15–18 months (MenACWY-TT group); MenACWY-TT co-administered with DTaP at 15–18 months (Coad group); or HibMenCY-TT at 12–15 months and DTaP at 15–18 months (HibMenCY-TT group). Controls received DTaP at 15–18 months. Only children in the HibMenCY-TT group received a fourth dose of Hib conjugate vaccine due to Hib conjugate vaccine shortage at the time of the study. DTaP immunogenicity and reactogenicity were assessed one month post-vaccination.ResultsPre-defined statistical non-inferiority criteria between Coad and Control groups were met for diphtheria, tetanus and filamentous haemagglutinin but not pertussis toxoid and pertactin. Following vaccination ≥99% of children had anti-diphtheria/anti-tetanus concentrations ≥1.0 IU/ml. Pertussis GMCs were lower in all investigational groups versus Control. In post hoc analyses, pertussis antibody concentrations were above those in infants following 3-dose DTaP primary vaccination in whom efficacy against pertussis was demonstrated (Schmitt, von König, et al., 1996; Schmitt, Schuind, et al., 1996). The reactogenicity profile of the Coad group was similar to DTaP administered alone.ConclusionRoutine booster DTaP was immunogenic with an acceptable safety profile when co-administered with MenACWY-TT vaccine in HibMenCY-TT-primed toddlers. These data support the administration of a fourth DTaP dose following a 4-dose HibMenCY-TT vaccination series, or co-administered with MenACWY-TT in HibMenCY-TT-primed children.     

Concomitant administration of a fully liquid,ready-to-use DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T hexavalent vaccine with a meningococcal serogroup C conjugate vaccine in infants

DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T or hexavalent vaccines are indicated for primary and booster vaccination of infants and toddlers against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, poliomyelitis and invasive diseases caused by Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib). The present study evaluates the safety and immunogenicity of a ready-to-use hexavalent vaccine when co-administered with a meningococcal serogroup C conjugate (MenC) vaccine in infants.This was a phase III, open-label, randomised, multicentre study conducted in Finland. Healthy infants, aged 46–74 days (n = 350), were randomised in a ratio of 1:1 to receive DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T vaccine at two, three and four months, either with a MenC vaccine co-administered at two and four months (Group 1; n = 175) or without MenC vaccine (Group 2; n = 175). All infants also received routine rotavirus and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines.The proportion of participants with an anti-HBs concentration ⩾10 mIU/mL assessed one month after the third dose of DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T vaccine was 97.5% [95%CI: 93.1–99.3] in the coadministration group and 96.1% [95%CI: 91.8–98.6] in the group without MenC vaccine. The proportion of participants with an anti-MenC SBA titre ⩾8 assessed one month after the second dose of MenC vaccine was 100% in the coadministration group. Both primary objectives were achieved.Secondary immunogenicity and safety analyses showed that co-administration of DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T and MenC vaccines did not impact the immune response to the antigens of each of the two vaccines. All vaccines were well tolerated and the safety profile of DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T vaccine was similar in both groups.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01839175; EudraCT number: 2012-005547-24.     

Immune response to second vaccination series of hepatitis B virus among booster dose non-responders

ObjectiveTo evaluate the response to second vaccination series among post-booster sero-negative children who had previously received compulsory HBV vaccination.Subjects and methodsAfter given a booster dose to 1070 children, 103 of them failed to generate anamnestic response (anti-HBs <10 IU/L). Only 91/103 children received additional two doses of recombinant HBV vaccine (i.e. 2^nd vaccination series) after 1 and 6 months post-booster. Blood sample was withdrawn aseptically one month later for quantitative assessment of anti-HBs to detect development of protective immune response (≥10 IU/L). Immunological vaccination failure was assigned to children who did not develop protective immune response after 2^nd vaccination series.ResultsProtective immune response was detected among 84/91 children (92.3%). While 7/91 (7.7%) whose age were ≥10 years did not respond and had post-booster undetectable anti-HBs. About 80% of children with post-booster detectable anti-HBs showed significant protective immune response (anti-HBs ≥100 IU/L) and higher GMT (299.1 ± 3.6 IU/L) compared to those with undetectable 60% and 106.2 ± 12.9 IU/L respectively (P < 0.05). No significant difference was detected as regards gender or residence, P > 0.05. All children with history of rheumatic fever (7 children) or diabetes mellitus (1 child) developed immune response after 2^nd vaccination series.ConclusionA booster dose of HB vaccine may be unable to induce sufficient immunological response in children who had undetectable anti-HBs titers. Revaccination for non-responders is an important procedure to increase HBV protection rate.     

Safety,tolerability, and immunogenicity of 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in older infants and young children in China who are naive to pneumococcal vaccination: Results of a phase 4 open-label trial

BackgroundThis postlicensure study was conducted to assess immunogenicity and safety of PCV7 catch-up regimens in previously unvaccinated older infants and young children in China.MethodsHealthy children 121 days to <72 months were grouped by age and immunized with 1 of 4 PCV7 dosing regimens. Serotype-specific IgG geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) and percentage of subjects with IgG ≥ 0.35 μg/mL were assessed before vaccination and 1 and 12 months postvaccination. The incidence of clinically important adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs), AEs leading to study withdrawal, and protocol-related AEs were assessed throughout the study.ResultsPrevaccination serotype-specific GMCs were generally low in subjects <24 months; the majority of children 24 to <72 months had IgG concentrations ≥0.35 μg/mL. One month postvaccination, GMCs were similar across groups for the 7 PCV serotypes, ranging from 3.95 to 13.02 μg/mL; the highest antibody levels were observed for serotype 14. Regardless of dosing regimen, >90% of subjects had IgG ≥ 0.35 μg/mL for each PCV serotype. At 12-month follow-up, IgG GMCs ranged from 0.65 to 5.19, and all remained above prevaccination IgG GMC; >70% of subjects had IgG ≥ 0.35 μg/mL. Older children generally had the most robust immune response both at 1 month postvaccination and during 12-month follow-up. PCV7 was well tolerated. Pyrexia, which was mild to moderate in severity, was the most common AE. Two subjects reported SAEs (n = 4), and there was 1 study withdrawal; none of these were considered treatment related.ConclusionIn China, PCV7 catch-up vaccinations given to older infants and young children naive to pneumococcal vaccines resulted in a robust immune response to all serotypes; this response persisted after 1 year. PCV7 was well tolerated in Chinese infants and children.     

A Phase III randomized,double-blind,clinical trial of an investigational hexavalent vaccine given at 2, 4, and 11–12 months

BackgroundCombination vaccines simplify vaccination visits and improve coverage and timeliness. DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib is a new investigational, fully-liquid, combination vaccine designed to protect against 6 infectious diseases, including 5 pertussis antigens and OMPC instead of PT as conjugated protein for Hib component.MethodsIn this multicenter, double-blind, comparator-controlled, Phase III study (NCT01480258) conducted in Sweden, Italy, and Finland, healthy infants were randomized 1:1 to receive one two immunization regimens. The DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib Group received the investigational hexavalent vaccine (DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib) and the Control Group received Infanrix-hexa (DTPa3-HBV-IPV/Hib) at 2, 4 and 11–12 months of age. Both groups received concomitantly Prevnar 13 (PCV13) and Rotateq (RV5) or Rotarix (RV1) at 2, 4 months of age and PCV13 at 11–12 months. Subjects administered RV5 received a 3rd dose at 5 months of age.ResultsA total of 656 subjects were randomized to the DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib Group and 659 subjects to Control Group. Immune responses to all vaccine antigens post-toddler dose were non-inferior in the DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib Group as compared to the Control Group. Additionally, the post-dose 2 and pre-toddler DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib anti-PRP responses were superior. The DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib Group responses to concomitant RV1 were non-inferior compared to the Control Group.Solicited adverse event rates after any dose were similar in both groups, except for higher rates of pyrexia (6.4% difference; 95% CI: 1.5, 11.3) and somnolence (5.8% difference; 95% CI: 1.7, 9.8) in the DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib Group. Vaccine-related serious adverse events occurred infrequently in the DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib Group (0.3%) and the Control Group (0.5%).ConclusionsThe safety and immunogenicity of DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib is generally comparable to Control when administered in the 2, 4, 11–12 month schedule. Early Hib responses were superior versus Control. DTaP5-HB-IPV-Hib could provide a new hexavalent option for pediatric combination vaccines, aligned with recommended immunizations in Europe.Study identification: V419-008CLINICALTRIALS.GOV identifier: NCT01480258     

Quadrivalent meningococcal (MenACWY-TT) conjugate vaccine or a fourth dose of H. influenzae–N. meningitidis C/Y conjugate vaccine (HibMenCY-TT) is immunogenic in toddlers who previously received three doses of HibMenCY-TT in infancy

BackgroundImmunogenicity and safety of a single dose of MenACWY-TT or a fourth dose of HibMenCY-TT were evaluated in the second year of life in HibMenCY-TT-primed toddlers.MethodsHealthy infants were randomized (5:1) and primed at 2, 4 and 6 months of age with HibMenCY-TT and diphtheria–tetanus–acellular pertussis–hepatitis B-inactivated poliovirus (DTaP–HBV–IPV) vaccine; or Hib-TT and DTaP–HBV–IPV (control). Recipients of HibMenCY-TT + DTaP–HBV–IPV were re-randomized (2:2:1) to receive MenACWY-TT at 12–15 months and DTaP at 15–18 months; MenACWY-TT co-administered with DTaP at 15–18 months; or HibMenCY-TT at 12–15 months and DTaP at 15–18 months. Controls received DTaP only at 15–18 months due to Hib conjugate vaccine shortage. Serum bactericidal activity using human complement (hSBA) and safety were assessed one month after meningococcal vaccination.ResultsAfter vaccination with MenACWY-TT at 12–15 months or MenACWY-TT + DTaP at 15–18 months, all subjects previously primed for serogroups C/Y had hSBA ≥1:8 for these serogroups. At least 96.1% also had hSBA ≥1:8 for serogroups A/W. All subjects in the HibMenCY-TT group had hSBA ≥1:8 for serogroups C/Y. All pre-defined statistical criteria for meningococcal immunogenicity were satisfied. All vaccination regimens had acceptable safety profiles.ConclusionChildren primed with three doses of HibMenCY-TT who then received a single dose of MenACWY-TT or a fourth dose of HibMenCY-TT had robust increases in hSBA titers for serogroups C/Y. These data provide support that MenACWY-TT, given with or without the fourth scheduled dose of DTaP could be administered as an alternative to a fourth dose of HibMenCY-TT in the second year of life.This study (110870/110871) is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00614614.     

Immunogenicity and safety of 11- and 12-valent pneumococcal non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae protein D-conjugate vaccines (11vPHiD-CV, 12vPHiD-CV) in infants: Results from a phase II,randomised, multicentre study

Background

We assessed 2 investigational 11- and 12-valent vaccines, containing capsular polysaccharides of 10 serotypes as in the pneumococcal non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae protein D-conjugate vaccine (PHiD-CV) and CRM₁₉₇-conjugated capsular polysaccharides of serotypes 19A (11-valent) or 19A and 6A (12-valent).

A phase 1, open-label,randomized study to compare the immunogenicity and safety of different administration routes and doses of virosomal influenza vaccine in elderly

BackgroundInfluenza remains a significant problem in elderly despite widespread vaccination coverage. This randomized, phase-I study in elderly compared different strategies of improving vaccine immunogenicity.MethodsA total of 370 healthy participants (⩾65 years) were randomized equally 1:1:1:1:1:1 to six influenza vaccine treatments (approximately 60–63 participants per treatment arm) at day 1 that consisted of three investigational virosomal vaccine formulations at doses of 7.5, 15, and 45 μg HA antigen/strain administered intradermally (ID) by MicronJet600™ microneedle device (NanoPass Technologies) or intramuscularly (IM), and three comparator registered seasonal vaccines; Inflexal V™ (Janssen) and MF59 adjuvanted Fluad™ (Novartis) administered IM and Intanza™ (Sanofi Pasteur) administered ID via Soluvia™ prefilled microinjection system (BD). Serological evaluations were performed at days 22 and 90 and safety followed-up for 6 months.ResultsIntradermal delivery of virosomal vaccine using MicronJet600™ resulted in significantly higher immunogenicity than the equivalent dose of virosomal Inflexal V™ administered intramuscularly across most of the parameters and strains, as well as in some of the readouts and strains as compared with the 45 μg dose of virosomal vaccine formulation. Of 370 participants, 300 (81.1%) reported ⩾1 adverse event (AE); more participants reported solicited local AEs (72.2%) than solicited systemic AEs (12.2%).ConclusionsIntradermal delivery significantly improved influenza vaccine immunogenicity compared with intramuscular delivery. Triple dose (45 μg) virosomal vaccine did not demonstrate any benefit on vaccine’s immunogenicity over 15 μg commercial presentation. All treatments were generally safe and well-tolerated.     

A Phase III,multicenter, randomized,double-blind,active comparator-controlled study to evaluate the safety,tolerability, and immunogenicity of V114 compared with PCV13 in healthy infants (PNEU-PED-EU-1)

BackgroundV114 (15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine [PCV]) contains all serotypes in 13-valent PCV (PCV13) and additional serotypes 22F and 33F. This study evaluated safety and immunogenicity of V114 compared with PCV13 in healthy infants, and concomitant administration with DTPa–HBV–IPV/Hib and rotavirus RV1 vaccines.MethodsV114 and PCV13 were administered in a 2+1 schedule at 2, 4, and 11–15 months of age. Adverse events (AEs) were collected on Days 1–14 following each vaccination. Serotype-specific anti-pneumococcal immunoglobulin G (IgG) was measured 30 days post-primary series (PPS), immediately prior to a toddler dose, and 30 days post-toddler dose (PTD). Primary objectives included non-inferiority of V114 to PCV13 for 13 shared serotypes and superiority of V114 to PCV13 for the two additional serotypes.Results1184 healthy infants 42–90 days of age were randomized 1:1 to V114 (n = 591) or PCV13 (n = 593). Proportions of participants with solicited AEs and serious AEs were comparable between vaccination groups. V114 met pre-specified non-inferiority criteria for all 13 shared serotypes, based on the difference in proportions of participants with serotype-specific IgG concentrations ≥0.35 μg/mL (response rate; lower bound of two-sided 95% confidence interval [CI] >−10.0) and IgG geometric mean concentration (GMC) ratios (lower bound of two-sided 95% CI >0.5), and pre-specified superiority criteria for serotypes 22F and 33F (lower bound of two-sided 95% CI >10.0 for response rates and >2.0 for GMC ratios). Antibody responses to DTPa–HBV–IPV/Hib and RV1 vaccines met pre-specified non-inferiority criteria, based on antigen-specific response rates to DTPa–HBV–IPV/Hib and anti-rotavirus IgA geometric mean titers.ConclusionsAfter a 2+1 schedule, V114 elicited non-inferior immune responses to 13 shared serotypes and superior responses to the two additional serotypes compared with PCV13, with comparable safety profile. These results support the routine use of V114 in infants.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04031846; EudraCT: 2018-003787-31     

Immunogenicity and safety of a 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and an MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccine after concomitant vaccination in ⩾60-year-old adults

BackgroundConcomitant administration of influenza and pneumococcal vaccines could be an efficient strategy to increase vaccine uptake among older adults. Nevertheless, immune interference and safety issues have been a concern when more than one vaccines are administered at the same time.MethodsSubjects aged ⩾60 years were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive MF59-adjuvanted trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (MF59-aTIV) + 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) (Group 1), PCV13 alone (Group 2), or MF59-aTIV alone (Group 3). Hemagglutination inhibition (HI) and opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) assays were used to compare immunogenicity after single or concomitant vaccination.ResultsA total of 1149 subjects (Group 1, N = 373; Group 2, N = 394; Group 3, N = 382) were available for the assessment of immunogenicity and safety. All groups met immunogenicity criteria for the influenza vaccine in older adults with similar seroprotection rates, seroconversion rates, and geometric mean titer (GMT) fold-increases, irrespective of concomitant vaccination. For each pneumococcal serotype, OPA titers increased markedly after the PCV13 vaccination, irrespective of the concomitant influenza vaccination. After concomitant administration, the non-inferiority criteria of GMT ratios were met for all three influenza subtypes and 13 pneumococcal serotypes. No vaccine-related serious adverse events occurred.ConclusionsConcomitant MF59-aTIV and PCV13 administration showed no interference with antibody response and showed good safety profiles.(Clinical Trial Number – NCT02215863).     

Immunogenicity and safety of 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) in children aged 2–5 years in China

BackgroundThe widespread use of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) has significantly decreased pneumococcal disease worldwide. However, China has not adopted PCVs in their national immunization schedules and had only approved these vaccines for children aged 2–15 months by 2020.MethodsIn an open-label trial, enrolled healthy children aged 2–5 years old were randomized 1:1 and divided into a 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) group and a Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine (Hib) group. Children in the PCV7 group received a single dose of PCV7, and the Hib group received a single dose of Hib vaccine. Blood samples were collected before and 6 months after vaccination. Immunogenicity and safety of PCV7 were assessed at prespecified time points.ResultsSix months after a single dose of PCV7, children in the PCV7 group for all 7 serotypes, IgG mean concentrations (GMCs) and opsonophagocytic geometric mean titres (GMTs) were significantly higher (P < .001) than at baseline, and the proportion of IgG ≥ 0.35 µg/mL ranged from 90.0% to 100%. Although the antibody level increased with age, preexisting antibodies did not induce hyporesponsiveness to PCV7. In the Hib group, the antibody levels were not significantly different or had changed slightly at 6 months. PCV7 was well tolerated in all age groups, and no serious adverse events (AEs) emerged during this study.ConclusionsA single dose of PCV7 was immunogenic and safe for Chinese children aged 2–5 years, and the preexisting antibodies against the PCV7 serotypes did not change the response to vaccination. The findings supported the effectiveness of PCV7 in this age group. PCVs with broader serotype coverage are expected to expand pneumococcal disease protection.     

Contrasting female-male mortality ratios after routine vaccinations with pentavalent vaccine versus measles and yellow fever vaccine. A cohort study from urban Guinea-Bissau

BackgroundIn addition to protection against the target diseases, vaccines may have non-specific effects (NSEs). Measles vaccine (MV) has beneficial NSEs, providing protection against non-measles deaths, most so for girls. By contrast, though protecting against diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis, DTP vaccine is associated with increased female mortality relative to male mortality. In 2008, Guinea-Bissau replaced DTP with the DTP-containing pentavalent vaccine (Penta; DTP-H. influenza type B-Hepatitis B) at 6, 10 and 14 weeks and yellow fever vaccine (YF) was to be given with MV. We investigated possible sex-differential mortality rates following Penta and MV+YF vaccination.MethodsBandim Health Project (BHP) registers vaccines given by the three government health centres in the study area and vital status through demographic surveillance. We assessed the association between sex and mortality by vaccination status in Cox proportional hazards models with age as underlying timescale. Follow-up was censored at a subsequent vaccination contact or after 6 months of follow-up.ResultsBetween September 2008 and April 2011, we registered 23,448 vaccination contacts for children aged 42–365 days; 17,313 were for Penta and 3028 for MV (2907 co-administered with YF). During follow-up 112 children died. The female/male mortality rate ratio was 1.73 (1.11–2.70) following Penta and 0.38 (0.12–1.19) after MV (p = 0.02 for same effect). Adjusting for maternal education or weight-for-age at the time of vaccination did not change the estimates.ConclusionPenta appears to have the same negative effects on mortality as those seen for DTP. Assessing post-vaccination mortality for boys and girls is necessary to improve the vaccination programme.