Immunohistochemistry in diagnostic surgical pathology of the prostate

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) can play an important role in diagnostic surgical pathology of the prostate. Basal cell markers, such as the 34betaE12 antibody and antibodies directed against cytokeratin 5 and 6 or p63, are very useful for demonstration of basal cells as their presence argues against a diagnosis of invasive prostatic carcinoma (PC). However, several benign mimickers of PC, including atrophy, atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), nephrogenic adenoma, and mesonephric hyperplasia, can stain negatively with these markers, and thus, a negative basal cell marker immunostain alone does not exclude a diagnosis of benignancy. Although there are examples in the literature of high grade PC that stain focally with some of the basal cell markers, these cases are usually readily diagnosed based on H&E appearances and are unlikely to be confused with these benign mimickers. Alpha-methylacyl-coenzyme-A racemase (AMACR) is a sensitive marker of PC (except for a few uncommon variants: atrophic, foamy gland, and pseudohyperplastic variants), and its detection by immunohistochemical staining in atypical prostatic lesions can be very useful in confirming an impression of adenocarcinoma. AMACR expression can also be identified in high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), prostatic atrophy, AAH, and benign prostatic glands, and accordingly, a diagnosis of PC should not be based solely on a positive AMACR immunostain, especially when the luminal staining is weak and/or noncircumferential. The use of AMACR/basal cell antibody cocktails has been found to greatly facilitate the distinction between PC and its benign mimickers, especially when only limited tissue is available for staining. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) and prostate specific acid phosphatase (PSAP) are both quite sensitive and fairly specific markers of PC (there are a few nonprostatic tumors that can express one or both), and are both very helpful in establishing or confirming the diagnosis of PC when the differential diagnosis includes other tumors that can involve the prostate such as urinary bladder urothelial carcinoma. 34betaE12, p63, thrombomodulin, and uroplakin III are additional urothelial associated markers useful in this differential diagnosis. CDX2 and villin are useful markers to diagnostically separate colonic adenocarcinoma from PC. AMACR positivity and negative basal cell marker reactions are useful to confirm the presence of residual PC after hormonal or radiation therapy. Pan-cytokeratin, PSA, and PSAP can also highlight subtle infiltrates of PC with hormonal or radiation therapy effect. PSA and PSAP immunohistochemical stains are valuable in confirming metastatic carcinoma as being of prostatic origin and should always be utilized in the diagnostic evaluation of metastatic adenocarcinoma of unknown primary origin in males.     

Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (P504S)/34betaE12/p63 triple cocktail stain in prostatic adenocarcinoma after hormonal therapy

Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) has recently been shown to be a highly sensitive marker for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. However, there is limited information concerning its utility as a marker for prostate carcinoma after hormonal therapy. Our current investigation was conducted to evaluate the expression of AMACR in patients with prostate carcinoma after hormonal therapy and assess its diagnostic utility in combination with p63 and high molecular weight cytokeratin (34betaE12) staining. Prostate tissues from 49 patients who had been treated with hormonal therapy were immunohistochemically analyzed for AMACR, 34betaE12, and p63 expression by a triple antibody cocktail stain. The staining intensities and the percentages of positively staining tumor cells were recorded. The correlations between AMACR expression and metastatic status, associated hormonal therapy regimens, and the extent of hormone therapy effect were analyzed. All malignant acini were completely negative for both basal cell markers (34betaE12 and p63). Tumor cells failed to demonstrate expression of AMACR in 14 (29%) of 49 cases. In the remaining 35 cases (71%), positive immunostaining for AMACR was noted, but with variable intensities and percentages of cells stained. Positive staining for AMACR in benign glands was not seen in any case. In all cases, basal cells were strongly stained by p63 in benign acini with a mean positive percentage of 96%. Similarly, basal cells in benign acini displayed moderate staining intensities for 34betaE12 in 3 (7%) of 41 cases and strong immunostaining for this marker in the remaining 38 cases (93%); the mean percentage of positive cells was 92%. alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase expression may be substantially diminished or entirely lost in prostate carcinoma after hormonal therapy. This variation in AMACR expression does not correlate with the metastatic status, the modality of hormonal therapy, or the extent of therapy-related effect. It is important that pathologists be aware that some hormonally treated prostate carcinomas do not express AMACR, and that immunostaining in such cases must be interpreted with caution. A triple cocktail stain using AMACR, 34betaE12, and p63 can be helpful in evaluating prostate specimens for the presence of residual or recurrent carcinoma after hormonal therapy for cancer.     

Heterogeneous expression of alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase in prostatic cancer correlates with Gleason score

AIMS: Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) is a sensitive and specific immunohistochemical marker of prostatic malignancy, staining 80-100% of prostatic cancers with absent staining in benign glands. However, positive staining in benign conditions as well as low rates of AMACR reactivity in prostatic cancer variants have been described. Preliminary use of AMACR immunohistochemistry in our institution has suggested lower specificity and sensitivity for prostatic cancer than initially proposed. The aim of this study was to establish true rates of AMACR reactivity in prostatic cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS AND RESULTS: AMACR immunohistochemistry was performed on sections from 57 prostatic cancers and 44 BPH resections. Ninety-one percent of cancers were AMACR+, with diffuse (> 75%) tumour staining in 53% of cases. Thirty-eight percent of tumours showed heterogeneous expression (1-75% tumour staining). This was significantly correlated with increased Gleason score. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) was AMACR+ in 87% of cancers. Eleven percent of BPH showed moderate or strong staining in benign glands, focally mimicking the malignant staining pattern. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms heterogeneous AMACR expression in prostatic cancer and shows a correlation with Gleason score. Positive staining in BPH is also documented, thus emphasizing the importance of interpreting AMACR immunohistochemistry in the context of other findings in a diagnostic setting.     

Stratified epithelium in prostatic adenocarcinoma: a mimic of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

Typically glands of prostatic adenocarcinoma have a single cell lining, although stratification can be seen in invasive carcinomas with a cribriform architecture, including ductal carcinoma. The presence and diagnostic significance of stratified cells within non-cribriform carcinomatous prostatic glands has not been well addressed. The histomorphological features and immunohistochemical profile of cases of non-cribriform prostatic adenocarcinoma with stratified malignant glandular epithelium were analyzed. These cases were identified from needle biopsy cases from the consultation files of one of the authors and from a review of 150 consecutive in-house needle biopsy cases of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemistry was performed utilizing antibodies reactive against high molecular weight cytokeratin (34betaE12), p63 and alpha-methylacyl-coenzyme-A racemase (AMACR). A total of 8 cases were identified, including 2 from the 150 consecutive in-house cases (1.3%). In 4 cases, the focus with glands having stratified epithelium was the sole carcinomatous component in the biopsy, while such a component represented 5-30% of the invasive carcinoma seen elsewhere in the remaining cases. The main attribute in all these foci was the presence of glandular profiles lined by several layers of epithelial cells with cytological and architectural features resembling flat or tufted high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, but lacking basal cells as confirmed by negative 34betaE12 and/or p63 immunostains in all cases. The AMACR staining profile of the stratified foci was variable, with 4 foci showing positivity, and 3 foci being negative, including two cases that displayed AMACR positivity in adjacent non-stratified prostatic adenocarcinoma. Prostatic adenocarcinoma with stratified malignant glandular epithelium can be identified in prostate needle biopsy samples harboring non-cribriform prostatic adenocarcinoma and resembles glands with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. These 'PIN-like' carcinomas can present in pure form. Recognition of this pattern of prostatic adenocarcinoma is necessary to correctly diagnose such cases as invasive carcinoma.     

Using an AMACR (P504S)/34betaE12/p63 cocktail for the detection of small focal prostate carcinoma in needle biopsy specimens

We assessed the usefulness of immunohistochemical analysis with a 3-antibody cocktail (alpha-methylacyl coenzyme A racemase [AMACR, or P504S], 34betaE12, p63) and a double-chromogen reaction for detection of limited prostate cancer in 138 needle biopsy specimens, including 82 with small foci of prostatic adenocarcinoma and 56 benign prostates. When carcinoma was present, red cytoplasmic granular staining (AMACR) in the malignant glands and cells and dark brown nuclear (p63) and cytoplasmic (34betaE12) staining in basal cells of adjacent nonmalignant glands were found. Of 82 cases of small foci of prostatic adenocarcinoma, 78 (95%) expressed AMACR; all malignant glands were negative for basal cell staining. All benign glands adjacent to malignant glands were recognized easily by basal cell marker positivity and little or no AMACR expression. No benign glands were simultaneously positive for AMACR and negative for basal cell markers (specificity, 100%). There were no differences in intensity and numbers of positive glands with double-chromogen staining compared with using 1-color staining. Our results indicate that immunohistochemistry with a 3-antibody cocktail and double chromogen is a simple and easy assay that can be used as a routine test, which overcomes the problems of studying small lesions in prostate needle biopsies with multiple immunohistochemical stains.     

Utility of alpha-methylacyl coenzyme A racemase (p504s antibody) as a diagnostic immunohistochemical marker for cancer.

Alpha-methylacyl-coenzyme A racemase (AMACR; P504S) is a mitochondrial and peroxisomal enzyme involved in the metabolism of branched-chain fatty acid and bile acid intermediates. Recently, AMACR has been demonstrated to be overexpressed in localized and metastatic prostate cancer and in high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia but not in normal prostatic glands, suggesting that it may be an important tumor marker. This study examines AMACR expression in a variety of human cancers to assess its viability as a tumor marker in the clinical setting. Two hundred sixty-three cancers from different sites were examined in three multitumor tissue micro arrays, which included two or three tissue cores (1.0 mm in diameter) from each neoplastic and normal tissue specimen. Cancers studied included breast (94 cases), prostate (38), lung (28), endometrium (27), colon (29), ovary (26), and melanoma (21). Normal tissues in the microarray were prostate (15), lung (6), endometrium (5), colon (4), ovary (2), and skin (3). Sections were immunostained, after prior pressure cooker antigen retrieval, using rabbit monoclonal AMACR antibody (1:40) (Zeta Corp, Sierra Madre, CA) and horseradish peroxidase-labeled polymer conjugated secondary antibody (Envision, Dako, Carpinteria, CA). A section of prostate cancer and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia was used as positive control. Protein expression was scored as negative, weak (faint cytoplasmic or granular apical staining), moderate (diffuse granular cytoplasmic stain), and strong (diffuse intense cytoplasmic stain). Only moderate and strong staining was considered as positive staining, based on prior work. AMACR protein overexpression was found in several cancers, including prostate (34/38 [89.5%]), colon (13/29 [44.8%]), lung (4/28 [14.3%]), melanoma (2/21 [9.5%]), endometrium (2/27 [7.4%]), and breast (3/94 [3.2%]). None of the ovarian cancers (26 cases) demonstrated AMACR overexpression. AMACR expression was not present in any of the normal tissues nor in benign prostatic tissue associated with prostate carcinomas. This study suggests that AMACR is potentially an important tumor marker, particularly for prostate and colon cancer. It may be a useful adjunct to an immunohistochemical panel employed in the differential diagnosis of colon versus ovarian and breast carcinoma; the latter two infrequently express AMACR.     

Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase/P504S overexpression in colorectal carcinoma is correlated with tumor differentiation.

Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR)/P504S is an enzyme involved in the metabolism of branched-chain fatty acids. Little is known about correlation of AMACR expression with colorectal carcinoma (CRC) differentiation and prognosis. We investigated the expression of AMACR in 106 cases of primary CRC, and in 47 lymph nodes with metastatic CRC by immunohistochemical analysis. These cases were divided into 3 groups according to the histologic differentiation of the primary tumors. group A included 50 cases of histologically well and moderately differentiated CRCs, 20 of these with lymph node metastasis; group B included 23 cases of well and moderately differentiated CRCs, histologically similar to group A, except these tumors had small foci (less than 20%) of high-grade carcinoma, and 10 of these had lymph node metastasis; group C included 33 cases of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and undifferentiated carcinoma, 17 with lymph node metastasis. The results showed the overall positive rates of expression in primary and metastatic CRCs were 59.4% and 46.8%, respectively. Expression in groups A (76.0%) and B (69.6%) was much higher than that in group C (27.3%). In group B, although overexpression of AMACR in primary tumors was similar to that of group A, it was only seen in 30.0% of group B metastatic tumors, which was similar to the rate of expression in group C (23.5%). In contrast, rates of expression in group A primary and metastatic tumors were similar (80.0% and 75.0%). Positive staining for AMACR in benign epithelium adjacent to tumor was rare (<2%). No relation was found between AMACR expression and overall survival. Our findings support the view that the expression of AMACR in CRC is correlated with tumor differentiation.     

Is there a role for fatty acid synthase in the diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma?: A comparison with AMACR

Our aim was to compare the usefulness of fatty acid synthase (FASn) with that of α-methylacyl coenzyme-A racemase (AMACR) in the diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma. The expression of these 2 markers was compared in a tissue microarray containing 62 foci of benign glands and 36 foci of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Similar to AMACR, there was significantly higher FASn expression in adenocarcinoma compared with that in benign glands. The optimal accuracy rate and area under curve (AUC) by receiver operating characteristic analysis for FASn were not significantly different from those for AMACR (accuracy, 80% vs 87%; AUC, 0.942 vs 0.956; P for both, > .05). Moreover, in cases with coexistent malignant and benign glands on the same core, FASn could selectively distinguish a proportion of cases (17/21 [81%]) similar to using AMACR. We conclude that FASn may aid in the diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma, at least to supplement AMACR as another positive marker of carcinoma and potentially increase diagnostic accuracy.     

抗体鸡尾酒AMACR/P63/34βE12在前列腺良恶性病变鉴别诊断中的应用价值

目的:探讨抗体鸡尾酒AMACR/P63/34βE12在前列腺良恶性病变鉴别诊断中的应用价值。方法:收集2001~2005年111例前列腺手术切除标本，其中前列腺腺癌39例，高级别前列腺上皮内瘤（high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasias，HGPIN）29例，非典型性腺瘤样增生（atypical adenomatous hyperplasia, AAH）3例，前列腺结节性增生（benign prostatic hyperplasia, BPH）40例。作抗体鸡尾酒AMACR/P63/34βE12的免疫标记，观察3种抗体在各类病变中的表达情况。结果:39例前列腺腺癌AMACR全部呈阳性，癌巢周围无基底细胞残存（P63/34βE12阴性）。29例高级别前列腺上皮内瘤变，14例（48.3%）腺泡上皮AMACR呈阳性，29例腺泡上皮周围有连续或不连续的基底细胞（P63/34βE12阳性）。3例非典型性腺瘤样增生中2例腺泡上皮AMACR呈弱阳性；3例腺泡上皮周围有较连续的基底细胞（P63/34βE12中度阳性）。40例前列腺结节性增生，腺泡上皮AMACR染色均呈阴性，周围有连续的基底细胞（P63/34βE12强阳性）。结论:鸡尾酒抗体AMACR/P63/34βE12标记前列腺组织，能够同时高特异性和敏感性地检测出前列腺腺癌细胞（或非典型增生的腺泡上皮细胞）和基底细胞，为前列腺腺癌与高级别上皮內瘤变、非典型性腺瘤样增生、前列腺结节性增生的鉴别诊断提供有力的证据。     

Utility of immunohistochemistry for alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase in distinguishing atrophic prostate cancer from benign atrophy

Small atrophic prostate cancers on needle biopsy are rare and difficult to distinguish from benign atrophy on needle biopsy. We report on a study of 23 needle biopsy specimens with small foci of atrophic prostate cancer from the consult service of one of the authors. In 19 cancer cases the atrophic component was pure; in 4 cases it was dominant with a minor (<5%) nonatrophic cancer component. These atrophic cancers and 16 cases of florid benign atrophy on needle biopsy were examined by immunohistochemistry for alpha-methylacyl-CoA-racemase (AMACR). All cases of cancer and atrophy were verified immunohistochemically with antibodies to basal cells (34betaE12 and p63). AMACR staining were scored as 1+ (5% to 25% of glands expressing AMACR), 2+ (26% to 50% of glands expressing AMACR), or 3+ (>50% of glands expressing AMACR). Positive staining was defined as staining above that of surrounding benign glands. AMACR was expressed in 69.6% of atrophic prostate cancers (3+, 11 cases; 2+, 3 cases; 1+, 2 cases); 30.4% (7 cases) of atrophic prostate cancer exhibited no AMACR expression. In the 4 cases with a few glands of ordinary (nonatrophic) prostate cancer, the nonatrophic cancer demonstrated more intense and a greater extent of AMACR staining. Fourteen cases (87.5%) of benign atrophy showed no AMACR expression. In 2 cases (12.5%) of benign atrophy, background immunostaining made it difficult to assess AMACR expression. We conclude that AMACR immunostaining alone is not sufficiently discriminatory in the differential diagnosis of atrophic prostate cancer versus benign atrophy. Atrophic prostate cancers are not as frequently or as strongly positive as ordinary prostate cancer. Using a panel of immunostains including AMACR, 34betaE12 and p63 (positive AMACR immunostaining along with negative basal cell markers) is recommended in the differentiation of atrophic prostate cancer and benign atrophy.     

Analysis of alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (P504S) expression in high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia

Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR), also known as P504S, is a recently identified molecular marker for prostate cancer. The expression of AMACR/P504S has also been observed in high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), a precursor lesion of prostate cancer. However, a detailed study focusing on the analysis of AMACR/P504S expression in high-grade PIN has not been performed. In this study, we analyzed AMACR/P504S expression by immunohistochemistry in 3954 prostatic ducts and acini with high-grade PIN from 140 prostatectomy specimens. AMACR/P504S immunoreactivity was measured as negative (0), weakly positive (+1), moderately positive (+2), and strongly positive (+3). AMACR/P504S immunoreactivity was detected in 90.0% (126/140) of high-grade PIN cases, although only 41.5% (1642/3954) of prostatic glands involved by PIN showed AMACR/P504S immunoreactivity. A significantly higher AMACR/P504S-positive rate (56.0%) was found in isolated high-grade PIN glands adjacent to cancer (distance less than 5 mm) compared with those away from cancer (distance more than 5 mm; 14%, P < 0.0001). High-grade PIN glands adjacent to cancer also showed a higher (P < 0.0004) AMACR/P504S intensity (1.62) than did those away from cancer (1.11). Our results suggest that PIN strongly positive for AMACR/P504S might be more closely associated with cancer than PIN negative or weakly positive for AMACR/P504S. This study provides additional evidence to link high-grade PIN as a precursor lesion to prostatic adenocarcinoma.     

Alpha-methylacyl coenzyme A racemase immunoreactivity in partial atrophy of the prostate

It was reported that 15 of 19 consultation cases of prostatic partial atrophy were a-methylacyl coenzyme A racemase (AMACR)-positive. We investigated partial atrophy cases from a single institution using a standard AMACR immunostaining method. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed using an antibody cocktail containing p63, high-molecular-weight keratin (34bE12), and AMACR antibodies on 122 foci of partial atrophy. AMACR staining was analyzed in partial atrophy (n = 122) and compared with adjacent benign glands (n = 122) and prostatic carcinomas (n = 28). Of 122 foci of partial atrophy, 38 (31.1%) showed AMACR immunoreactivity. Typically, AMACR staining was weak or moderate. In addition, 82 (67.2%) showed patchy to negative distribution of basal cells. Partial atrophy may show AMACR immunoreactivity when using a 34bE12, p63, and AMACR antibody cocktail staining method. Compounding this problem, focal lack of basal cells may be seen. However, the AMACR staining pattern of partial atrophy is usually comparable to that of adjacent benign glands and substantially different from adenocarcinoma.     

Variation of alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase expression in prostate adenocarcinoma cases receiving hormonal therapy

alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) is widely used as a diagnostic marker of prostate adenocarcinoma. It is also used to identify residual adenocarcinoma cells in posthormonal therapy cases. However, there have been very few studies on the relationship between hormonal therapy, which is also called androgen withdrawal therapy and AMACR expression. Here, we carried out a study on AMACR expression in paired pre- and posthormonal therapy prostate adenocarcinoma cases using an immunohistochemical method and a digital imaging system to elucidate the relationship between AMACR expression and hormonal therapy. This study showed that AMACR expression was decreased in 65 of 98 paired cases after hormonal therapy (Mann-Whitney U test, P < .05). Wilcoxon analysis also demonstrated a difference in the AMACR digital average expression in all 98 cases (P < .0001). However, this variation in AMACR expression did not seem to have any relevance to the response to hormonal therapy (P = .5386). We propose that AMACR, as a diagnostic marker, should be carefully used in posthormonal therapy cases. Further investigation of the relationship between AMACR expression and androgen or androgen receptors may provide new insight into novel preventive and curative medicine for prostate adenocarcinoma.     

Prospective evaluation of AMACR (P504S) and basal cell markers in the assessment of routine prostate needle biopsy specimens

Distinguishing benign prostate glands from malignant ones, based purely on morphology, on prostatic core needle biopsy specimens (PNBs) may prove difficult, particularly if the suspicious focus is small. In recent years, several immunohistochemical markers, including the basal cell cocktail (BCC), 34betaE12 and p63, and the prostate cancer (PCa) biomarker alpha-methylacyl-CoA-racemase (AMACR), have been used as adjuvants to morphology, in these diagnostically challenging cases. We prospectively address the diagnostic utility of using the BCC, in combination with the commercially available AMACR monoclonal antibody, P504S, on PNBs that required immunohistochemistry (IHC) studies to make a diagnosis. The goals of this prospective study were to assess the day-to-day practice in an academic setting, to determine how often these IHC tests were used on routine PNBs, and to establish how often a combination of the BCC and P504S were helpful in diagnosing prostate cancer. A total of 772 prospectively collected PNB cases were examined over a 7-month period. IHC staining was performed in 171 cases (22%); 123 cases were stained with the BCC in addition to the commercially available monoclonal AMACR antibody. In 86 of these 123 cases (70%), both stains contributed to the final diagnosis: PCa in 44 cases, benign in 33 cases and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in 9 cases. Of the remaining 37 cases (30%), 18 were called benign or PCa, based solely on appropriate staining with the BCC, with AMACR being noncontributory because the focus of interest had been cut through (12 cases), there was negative staining with AMACR (in 4 PCa cases), or there was positive staining with AMACR (in 2 benign cases showing atrophy). Nineteen of 37 cases were diagnosed as atypical small acinar proliferation. In these 19 cases either the focus had been cut through on one or both of the stains (11 cases), both AMACR and BCC failed to work (2 cases), AMACR was positive in the presence of patchy BCC staining (1 cases), AMACR was negative in the absence of BCC staining (3 cases), or despite appropriate staining the focus consisted of 1 gland and was considered too small to call carcinoma (2 cases). Additional IHC stains were performed in 171 of 772 cases; of these, 123 had sufficient material to perform both the BCC and P504S. The BCC when used in combination with AMACR rendered a diagnosis in almost 70% of cases. Using these stains in combination may be a better approach in diagnostically difficult cases as it increases the likelihood that a definitive diagnosis can be rendered while decreasing the likelihood of an equivocal diagnosis. However, a limitation of this approach is the loss of tissue in these small lesions, suggesting that combining AMACR and the BCC on a single slide would be superior to using either marker separately.     

Comparison of annexin II, p63 and alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase immunoreactivity in prostatic tissue: a tissue microarray study

BACKGROUND: Current ancillary markers for diagnosis in prostate biopsies include p63 and alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR). Annexin II (ANXII), a calcium and phospholipid binding protein, is lost in prostate cancer. AIMS: To investigate ANXII expression in order to assess its utility as a novel diagnostic marker in comparison to p63 and AMACR. METHODS: Using immunohistochemistry on six tissue microarrays, ANXII, p63, and AMACR expression was analysed from 210 radical prostatectomy cases. Staining was evaluated in benign and atrophic glands, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), and prostatic adenocarcinoma. Separate scores were given for ANXII, AMACR and p63 expression. RESULTS: Diffuse cytoplasmic expression of ANXII correlated with p63 reactivity in basal cells. Benign glands were positive for ANXII in 286/292 cores (98%) and negative for AMACR in all 292 cores. HGPIN showed heterogeneous expression of AMACR and ANXII. A significantly larger proportion of HGPIN glands were correctly identified as ANXII negative than as positive for AMACR. ANXII loss in prostate cancer was found in 282/320 cores (88%) and correlated with positive AMACR expression (272/320 cores, 85%), which was not statistically significant. There was no statistically significant correlation between ANXII scores and the clinical parameters examined. CONCLUSIONS: Immunohistochemical staining for ANXII is a consistent and reliable marker of prostatic neoplasia. The findings of this study suggest the potential utility of ANXII as a diagnostic aid in prostate cancer histopathology.     

Differential expression of alpha-methylacyl-coenzyme A racemase in colorectal carcinoma bears clinical and pathologic significance

alpha-methylacyl-coenzyme A racemase (AMACR) is a recently discovered biomarker that is shown to be overexpressed in some prostatic carcinomas and associated with prostatic cancer progression. Given that AMACR plays an important role in peroxisomal beta-oxidation of branched-chain fatty acids from red meat and dairy products, and that consumption of red meat may increase risk of developing colon cancer as suggested by epidemiological studies, it is plausible to explore the function of AMACR in colorectal carcinoma. A few previous studies have indeed observed overexpression of AMACR in 45% to 69% of the colorectal carcinomas. However, the clinical and pathologic characteristics of such AMACR expressers have not been investigated. In this study, the immunohistochemical expression pattern of AMACR of 163 patients with primary colorectal carcinoma treated primarily with surgical resection was analyzed and correlated with tumor pathologic features (tumor location, histologic type, grade, pathologic stage, lymph node and distant metastasis) and patient outcome (disease-specific survival). The results showed variable positive staining for AMACR in 123 (75%) of 163 tumors, and moderate to strong staining in 63 (39%) of 163. Lack of staining or low-intensity staining appeared to correlate significantly with mucinous histology (P < .001), poor tumor differentiation (P = .021), and presence of lymphovascular invasion (P = .032). Patients whose tumors showed lack of staining or low-intensity staining also had a significantly worse 5-year disease-specific survival (P < .012), as did patients whose tumors had lymphovascular invasion, or were of high American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage. On multivariate analysis, AMACR staining and AJCC staging remained independent predictors for patient outcome. Thus, our data suggest that AMACR expression in colorectal carcinoma correlates with certain tumor pathologic characteristics (histologic type, differentiation, and lymphovascular invasion) and patient outcome. Additional confirmatory studies are needed to establish the significance of AMACR as a prognostic marker for colorectal carcinoma. Further investigation on interaction between AMACR and other known colorectal cancer development pathways may provide new insights on colorectal carcinogenesis.     

Exfoliative sputum cytology of cancers metastatic to the lung

Although largely replaced by fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and bronchoscopy, cytological examination of sputum for exfoliated malignant cells still is considered a valuable initial diagnostic test in patients presenting with a lung mass. Thirty-five cases of secondary/metastatic tumors involving the lung and diagnosed on sputum were retrospectively reviewed from our cytopathology files for a period of 22 yr (1980-2001). Clinical history and the relevant histopathological material were examined and correlated with the cytological findings. In all cases, a history of malignancy was known. Cytological diagnoses included colonic adenocarcinoma (7 cases); non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL; 5 cases); malignant melanoma (MM; 5 cases); breast carcinoma (5 cases); Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL; 3 cases); pancreatic adenocarcinoma (2 cases); prostatic adenocarcinoma (2 cases); and 1 case each of urothelial carcinoma, endometrial carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, hepatic small-cell carcinoma, squamous-cell carcinoma (cervix), and leiomyosarcoma (LMS). Cellular preservation was optimal in all cases. The smear background was relatively clean in 25 (71%) cases and predominantly inflamed and/or necrotic in 10 (29%) cases. In non-lymphoid tumors (27 cases), isolated single malignant cells were seen in 7 (26%) cases (all cases of MM and prostatic adenocarcinoma), whereas 20 (74%) cases displayed fragments with intact tumor architecture. Overall, only 10/35 (29%) cases showed noticeable tumor-cell necrosis. In one case (LMS), cell block sections were used for immunoperoxidase (IPOX) studies with positive staining for desmin and actin. Exfoliation of cancer cells in sputum from secondary tumors in the lung is a rare phenomenon in current-day practice, with metastatic colonic adenocarcinoma seen most commonly. Intact tumor architecture was observed in exfoliated cells in 75% of the cases.     

Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (P504S) expression in evolving carcinomas within benign prostatic hyperplasia and in cancers of the transition zone

Carcinomas of the transition zone (TZ) constitute approximately 20% of all prostate cancers. The TZ is the site of origin of grade 1 and grade 2 cancers, the most well-differentiated of the Gleason grade tumors, as well as for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). In this regard, grade 1 carcinoma has architectural features that closely mimic gland-rich BPH nodules. Although a relationship between cancers arising in this zone and BPH has been suspected, such an association remains undefined. To gain insight into the origin, development, and progression of cancers arising in the TZ, we used a highly specific rabbit monoclonal antibody (P504S) directed against alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) to study the expression of the enzyme in 25 cases of evolving and fully developed carcinomas of this zone. AMACR has been proposed as a new molecular marker for prostate cancer, because the enzyme is reportedly overexpressed in high-grade dysplasias, also termed prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, a purported precursor of prostatic carcinoma, and in all grades of prostatic carcinoma of the peripheral zone. Using P504S, P63, or antikeratin 34beta E12 antibodies, we found it possible to define areas of transition from hyperplasia to carcinoma in 6 BPH nodules. In 3 other cancer-containing BPH nodules, staining for AMCAR was observed in benign hyperplastic glands that were juxtaposed to carcinoma. Enzyme expression was also evident in 5 additional cases in which BPH was found adjacent to cancer. In contrast; AMACR was not visualized in any other BPH nodules that we studied. Thus, using the enzyme as a marker, we document for the first time that some carcinomas of the TZ arise from an AMCAR-positive transition lesion within a subset of BPH nodules. Moreover, the finding of enhanced AMACR expression in benign glands within cancer-containing nodules as well as in BPH lesions adjacent to carcinoma suggests that in some cases, up-regulation of the enzyme may precede morphological evidence of neoplastic transformation. AMACR was lightly expressed in transition lesions and grade 1 carcinomas but more strongly expressed in higher-grade TZ cancers, suggesting that enzyme expression is enhanced with progression in this zone. Because AMACR is involved in the beta oxidation of branched fatty acids and their derivatives, enhanced expression of the enzyme in evolving carcinomas in BPH nodules, as well as its up-regulation in juxtaposed morphologically benign glands and grade 1 carcinomas, suggests that increased utilization of fatty acids may play an important role in carcinoma development and progression in the TZ.     

假增生型前列腺癌的病理学特征

目的探讨假增生型前列腺癌（PHPA）的临床病理特征及其发生率和生物学行为。方法复查上海交通大学附属第六人民医院2005年1月1日-2006年12月31日860例直肠B超引导下前列腺穿刺活检和46例前列腺癌根治手术切片,对疑有PHPA组织作34βE12（或CK5／6）、p63和AMACR单项免疫组织化学标记（EnVision法）和34βE12／p63／AMACR鸡尾酒抗体双重免疫组织化学标记,将在1个组织块中PHPA占该组织块中癌总量的面积百分比〉60％的病例归入本组,并作病理学分析。结果PHPA在穿刺活检和前列腺癌根治标本中的发生率分别为7．0％和15．2％。66．7％的PHPA与普通型前列腺癌直接移行,76．7％在其他组织块中有普通型癌。PHPA占穿刺活检中癌总量的比例为5％～100％,占根治标本中癌总量的比例为1％～30％。PHPA以大中腺泡增生为主,癌细胞分化较好,排列有极性,腔内常有残存淀粉样小体,低倍镜下类似良性前列腺增生。但腺泡排列紧密,腔内有嗜酸性结晶体和颗粒状无定形物质,核增大,有大核仁,免疫标记AMACR阳性,基底细胞标记阴性,在20项提示恶性的形态学指标中10项出现几率966．7％。PHPA虽然分化较好,但66．7％的PHPA有间质浸润,6．7％有神经浸润,3．3％有腺外浸润,3．3％发生骨转移,肿瘤分布部位周围带多于移行带。结论PHPA的实际发生率不低,绝大多数与普通型癌并存,由于形态学类似良性,肿瘤细胞量又不占多数,因此在诊断中容易被忽视,PHPA高分化前列腺癌不同,应属于Gleason3级的中分化腺癌。