Bridge to transplantation with a Thoratec left ventricular assist device in a 17-kg child

A Thoratec left ventricular assist device (LVAD) was used to support a 7-year-old 17-kg boy with viral cardiomyopathy for 23 days before heart transplantation. The boy is still living more than 1 year posttransplant, and functional except for some spastic paresis of the left hand, a residual from a stroke during device support. He is the smallest person to be supported with this device. We discuss techniques for using the Thoratec in children.     

Bridge to transplantation with a Toyobo-NCVC left ventricular assist device in a 3-year-old girl

In Japan, no pulsatile ventricular assist devices are available specifically for use in children. Pumps designed for adults are thus often used in children. We report herein a case of end-stage heart failure in a 3-year old girl (height 100.4 cm; body weight 16.2 kg; body surface area 0.66 m2) who underwent implantation with an adult-sized Toyobo-NCVC left ventricular assist device (Toyobo-National Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan) in our unit. We started with the driving mode to "full-fill, full-empty" mode. The problem was difficult-to-treat hypertension due to excessive stroke volume induced by the left ventricular assist device. Aggressive administration of antihypertensive therapy was needed. Successful heart transplantation was performed in Germany 5 months after beginning support with the Toyobo-NCVC left ventricular assist device.     

Bridge to transplantation with a left ventricular assist device for systemic ventricular failure after Mustard procedure

In recent years the conservative techniques to treat degenerative mitral valve insufficiency have developed to such an extent mainly due to a better understanding of the physiology and pathology of the mitral valve and to the possibility to get predictable and satisfactory results. Still a challenge persists for the cardiac surgeon when he has to deal with complex reconstructions. The technique described seems to offer an even better surgical option for patients with complex lesions involving the posterior mitral leaflet, especially as far as the hemodynamic performance is concerned.     

Bridge to recovery with a left ventricular assist device for fulminant acute myocarditis

Acute fulminant myocarditis frequently causes circulatory collapse that is resistant to conventional therapy. We describe a case in which a patient with histologically confirmed viral myocarditis was supported by a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as a bridge to recovery. The LVAD was successfully weaned 3 weeks later.     

Feasibility of cell transplantation with a left ventricular assist device to improve the success rate of left ventricular assist device removal: the first experiment

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) greatly support heart recovery, but recurrent heart failure after LVAD removal limits their use as 'a bridge to recovery'. The combination of LVADs and cell transplantation (CTx) is expected to be effective to improve the success rate of LVAD removal. We investigated the feasibility of combined CTx therapy and LVAD support with a new heterotopic rat heart-lung transplantation model that could simulate LVAD support and LVAD removal. The heart and both lungs of a rat were heterotopically transplanted, and the heart was kept unloaded for two weeks. The heart was then reloaded for two weeks (LVAD group). Syngenic smooth muscle cells were transplanted into the hearts that had been unloaded for a week, and the hearts were kept unloaded for another week and then reloaded (CT-LVAD group). In the unloaded state, CTx could reduce the left ventricle (LV) volume more effectively than LVAD therapy alone (P<0.01) and maintain the LV volume even after the hearts were reloaded (P<0.01). The results suggest that CTx with LVAD support can prevent recurrent LV dilation after LVAD removal and improve the success rate of LVAD removal.     

Bridge to durable left ventricular assist device for refractory cardiogenic shock

Objective

The role of short-term mechanical circulatory support has increased in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. However, limited data exist on the outcomes of a bridge to a durable left ventricular assist device strategy using short-term mechanical circulatory support.

Fungal left ventricular assist device endocarditis

BACKGROUND: Infection remains as the most serious complication and represents a significant threat to patients during long-term mechanical circulatory support. Fungal infection is a particularly worrisome complication and left ventricular assist device (LVAD) endocarditis does pose a serious threat. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-five patients underwent TCI Heartmate LVAD implantation between July 1991 and December 1999 at our institution. Detailed medical records were kept prospectively for all patients, and a variety of infection-related endpoints were analyzed on patients with fungal LVAD endocarditis. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients (22%) developed fungal infections during LVAD support. Five (3%) of those met our criteria for the diagnosis of fungal LVAD endocarditis. Microbial portals of entry were identifiable in all cases. Infections were managed successfully in 4 patients (80%). CONCLUSIONS: The successful management of fungal LVAD endocarditis currently requires early recognition of potentially nonspecific signs and symptoms, and timely institution of antifungal therapy. In some cases with device-specific manifestations of LVAD endocarditis, device removal and replacement is necessary. In patients with clinical manifestations of sepsis and fungal driveline site or pocket infections without positive blood culture, urgent transplantation may be the appropriate management. In the setting of shortage in the donor supply, device removal and replacement is necessary.     

Heart transplantation in a patient with a left ventricular assist device and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection

We report a patient who underwent implantation of a DeBakey left-ventricular assist device and developed a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus drive line infection on postoperative day 304. The patient was forwarded to urgent heart transplantation with a successful outcome.     

Is bridging to transplantation with a left ventricular assist device a risk factor for transplant coronary artery disease?

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support is associated with coagulopathy, bleeding, increased blood transfusion, and increased anti-HLA antibody production. Increased anti-HLA antibody production is associated with early transplant rejection, transplant coronary artery disease (CAD), and decreased post-transplant survival rates. We asked whether bridging to transplantation with an LVAD increases the risk of transplant CAD. METHODS: We reviewed data for all adults (>18 years old) who underwent heart transplantation at our institution between 1988 and 2000. After exclusion of transplant recipients who survived <3 years, we divided the remaining cohort into 2 groups: those bridged to transplantation with LVADs (mean duration of support, 149 +/- 107 days, n = 29) and those in United Network for Organ Sharing Status 1 bridged to transplantation without LVADs (controls, n = 86). We compared groups in terms of disease cause, age, sex, donor age, panel-reactive antibody testing, crossmatching, pre- and post-transplant cholesterol concentrations, diagnosis of diabetes mellitus or treated hypertension, infections, calcium channel blocker use, transplant rejection, ischemic time, cytomegalovirus infection, pre-transplant transfusion, and incidence of transplant CAD (defined as any coronary lesion identified by coronary angiography). We considered p < 0.05 to be significant. RESULTS: The bridged and control groups were similar in all respects except mean ischemic time (217 +/- 58 minutes vs 179 +/- 67 minutes, p = 0.007), post-transplant cholesterol concentration (212 +/- 55 mg/dl vs 171 +/- 66 mg/dl, p = 0.007), and pre-transplant transfusion incidence (100% vs 22%, p < 0.001). The incidence of transplant CAD was similar in both groups during a 3-year follow-up period (28% vs 17%, p = 0.238) and during total follow-up (34% vs 35%, p = 0.969). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified cholesterol concentration at 1 year after transplantation as a significant predictor of CAD at 3 years after heart transplantation (p = 0.0029, odds ratio = 0.984). CONCLUSIONS: Bridging to transplantation with an LVAD does not increase the risk of transplant CAD. Nevertheless, aggressive prophylactic therapy to minimize potential risk factors for transplant CAD, such as increased cholesterol concentration, is warranted in all transplant recipients.     

Bridge to transplant with the Novacor left ventricular assist system.

The Novacor left ventricular assist system is an implantable, electrically powered, wearable system that has been successfully used as a bridge to transplant since 1984. The pump is placed anterior to the left posterior rectus sheath with the percutaneous drive line positioned in the right lower abdominal wall. The seamless polyurethane blood sac is compressed by two solenoid-driven pusher plates. The inflow and outflow valves are porcine prostheses. The use of wearable external power packs facilitate patient mobility and rehabilitation before transplantation and may provide long-term support to selected patients as an alternative to transplantation.