Fluoride release from a glass ionomer cement.

The release of fluoride from a glass ionomer cement (ASPA) was compared with that from a silicate cement. Test specimens were shaken in a solution with hydroxyapatite for 7 weeks. The solution was changed every week and the fluoride taken up by the hydroxyapatite measured. The specimens released considerably more fluoride during each of the first 2 weeks than during each of the subsequent 5 weeks. The continued release did not decrease very much with time. Slightly more fluoride was released from the glass ionomer cement than from the silicate.     

Glass ionomer cements as a fluoride release system in vivo

Fluoride release to saliva from three glass ionomer cements, Vitrabond, Ketac-Fil, and ChemFil II, was followed for six weeks in vivo. Colony forming units (CFU) of S. mutans present in saliva before and after placement of glass ionomer restorations were analysed. Thirty-six children received 1-6 glass ionomer cement restorations of one of the three materials. Unstimulated saliva was collected and analysed before insertion of restorations (baseline measurement), immediately after treatment, after 3 weeks and after 6 weeks. The fluoride concentration was measured according to a method slightly modified from Ekstrand (1977) and Duckworth et al. (1987). Baseline concentration of fluoride was between 0.038 and 0.050 ppm. Immediately after placement of GIC restorations, fluoride concentrations increased to 0.8 for ChemFil II and 1.2 ppm for Ketac-Fil and Vitrabond. After 3 weeks, concentrations of released fluoride decreased about 35% for all three materials, and after 6 weeks, concentrations decreased another 30%. However, still after 6 weeks, the fluoride concentrations of unstimulated saliva was 10 times higher than the baseline values. The more restored teeth surfaces the higher was the saliva fluoride concentration found. The prevalence of S. mutants in saliva decreased after placement of the GIC restorations.     

Fluoride release from glass ionomer cement in vivo and in vitro

The aims of this study were to investigate in vivo the release of fluoride from three glass ionomer cements (GICs) Vitrebond, Ketac-Fil and ChemFil II into the saliva of preschool children for a 1-year period and also to study in vitro the release-absorption-release of fluoride from the same GICs for 16 weeks. In the first part of the study, glass ionomer restorations were placed in primary teeth in preschool children. Unstimulated saliva was collected and the fluoride in the saliva was measured before placement of the restorations, immediately after, after 3 weeks, after 6 weeks, and after 1 year. In the second part of the study, test specimens of GICs were placed in deionized water and the release of fluoride was measured weekly for 16 weeks. At week 12, samples were exposed to fluoride toothpaste. The concentration of fluoride in saliva was 0.04 ppm before placement of the restorations. After three weeks it had increased to 0.8 ppm and the level remained as high as 0.3 ppm even after 1 year. In the laboratory study the tested glass ionomer cements showed a capacity to absorb fluoride from the fluoride toothpaste and then release it. It is concluded that glass ionomer cement can act as a rechargeable slow release fluoride device.     

Mechanical and fluoride release properties of titanium tetrafluoride-added glass-ionomer cement

The aim of this study was to determine the fluoride-release and mechanical properties of a water-hardening glass-ionomer cement (GIC) (ChemFil Superior) when titanium tetrafluoride (TiF4) was added. Three experimental groups were prepared with TiF4 added to the liquid component of the material in concentrations of 0.5, 1, and 2%. The control group was the original form of the cement and free of TiF4. After the specimens (4 mm in diameter x 6 mm in length) were prepared, their compressive strength, microhardness, modulus of elasticity, and fluoride release were measured. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc test (Bonferroni/Dunn correction). The addition of TiF4 into GIC significantly reduced fluoride release from the material with the exception of 1% TiF4 (p < 0.0083). Compressive strengths of 0.5 and 1% TiF4-added GICs were higher than that of the original GIC, but it was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The differences among modulus of elasticity values of experimental and control groups were not significant (p > 0.05). Similarly, microhardness of GIC was not affected with TiF4 addition (p > 0.05).     

3种玻璃离子水门汀氟释放能力的体外研究

目的：对比研究3种玻璃离子水门汀在人工唾液中的氟释放能力。方法：选择FujiCem、FujiPlus和FujiI水门汀，分别制备10个直径4mm，高8mm的试样，每个试样浸入1ml人工唾液中，恒温37℃。采用离子选择电极分别于第1d、2d、3d、7d、14d、30d、90d测定3种材料的氟释放量。采用SPSS13．0软件进行统计分析。结果：3种材料均在第1d的氟释放量最高。第2d急剧下降，随后氟离子释放趋于平稳。在各个测量时间点，FujiCem的氟释放累积量最高，除了第1d外，FujiPlus释放量最低，且3种材料在90d测定的氟累积释放量总体均数间、组间两两比较均存在显著差异，P〈0．05，有统计学意义。结论：3种材料均能在一定时间内持续缓慢地向周围环境中释放氟离子，而FujiCem显示出更好的氟离子释放能力，在预防继发龋的发生方面具有一定的优势。     

The structure of experimental in vitro lesions around glass ionomer cement restorations in human teeth

Class V cavities were prepared at the amelo-cementum junction in sixty-eight extracted human teeth. Fifty-one were filled with glass ionomer cement (ASPA R′). ‘Secondary carious’ lesions were produced around thirty-five of the restorations by exposure to acidified gelatin. Thirty-three teeth served as controls of the effect of the preparation procedure, the conditioner, the ASPA liquid and the filling material proper on the cavity walls. Sixty 120 μm-thick longitudinal sections from the teeth with the restorations in situ were studied by polarized light microscopy and microradiography. The glass ionomer cement caused by itself a narrow zone of increased radiopacity in the dentine cavity wall. The ‘secondary caries’ pattern consisted of a subsurface outer lesion and a subsurface wall lesion as observed previously in corresponding experi ments with silicate fillings. Outer- lesions in enamel were more frequent than with silicate cement. In the cementum all the experimental teeth showed outer lesions. The wall lesions extended only slightly beyond the level of erosion of the restorations. Between the wall lesions (in dentine) or outer lesions (in cementum dentine) and the surface of the cavity wall, a zone of increased radiopacity was found, assumed to be due to reprecipitation of Ca and P promoted by release of fluoride from the filling material.     

Fluoride release and uptake characteristics of aesthetic restorative materials

The aims of this study were firstly to investigate the fluoride-releasing characteristics of two composite resins (Tetric and Valux Plus), two polyacid-modified resin composites (Compoglass and Dyract), and conventional glass-ionomer cement (Ceramfil beta). The second aim was to assess the fluoride uptake and subsequent release from the same range of materials. Fifteen discs (6 mm diameter and 1.5 mm height) were prepared for each material. Each disc was immersed in 4 ML of deionized water within a plastic vial. The release of fluoride was measured daily at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 15, 30 and 60 days. After daily fluoride release was measured for 60 days, samples were refluoridated in 1000-ppm sodium fluoride (NaF) solutions (pH 6.6) for 10 min and fluoride release was measured daily for a total of 5 days. The release of fluoride from aesthetic restorative materials was measured by using specific fluoride electrode and an ionanalyser. Results were statistically analysed by two-way repeated measure ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range test. The results revealed that all fluoride-containing materials (Ceramfil beta, Compoglass, Dyract, Tetric) released fluoride initially and the release was greatest at the first day. At any time during the test period Ceramfil beta released the most and Valux Plus did not release any detectable fluoride (P < 0.01). Sample exposures to 1000 ppm NaF solution increased the 24-h fluoride release from all fluoride-containing materials. This difference lasted only 24-48 h after exposure. Ceramfil beta had a tendency to recharge not seen with the other materials (P < 0.05).     

Fluoride release from a fluoride-containing amalgam, a glass ionomer cement and a silicate cement in artificial saliva

This study aimed to compare the fluoride release from a flouride-containing amalgam, a silicate cement and a glass ionomer cement in artificial saliva. After storing specimens in an artificial saliva for 7 weeks, the fluoride content in the solvent was measured by a spectrophotometric method. The fluoride release from silicate cement was about 5 times greater than from glass ionomer cement, which again showed a release 4 times greater than the fluoride-containing amalgam. The fluoride release relative to fluoride content in test specimens was greater from fluoride-containing amalgam and silicate cement than from glass ionomer cement.     

Fluoride release from a glass ionomer cement

abstract – The release of fluoride from a glass ionomer cement (ASPA®) was. compared with that from a silicate cement. Test specimens were shaken in a solution with hydroxyapadte for 7 weeks. The solution was changed every week and the fluoride taken up by the hydroxyapatite measured. The specimens released considerably more fluoride during each of the first 2 weeks than during each of the subsequent 5 weeks. The continued release did not decrease very much with time. Slightly more fluoride was released from the glass ionomer cement than from the silicate.     

Fluoride release from a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in a continuous-flow system. Effect of pH

Fluoride is added to many dental restorative materials, including glass-ionomer cements, for the specific purpose of leaching fluoride into the surrounding tissues to provide secondary caries inhibition. During the caries process, an acidic environment attacks the dental tissues as well as the glass-ionomer cement. We hypothesized that pH significantly affects the rate of release of fluoride from the glass-ionomer cement. A continuous-flow fluoride-measuring system that monitors the amount of fluoride released over time was used to determine the release of fluoride from a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (KetacFil). The results show that the release rate began with a fast burst of fluoride which quickly diminished to low levels in 3 days. Under neutral pH conditions, the rate of fluoride release at 72 hrs was significantly slower than at pH 4.     

Determination of fluoride ions released from resin-based dental materials using ion-selective electrode and ion chromatograph

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the quantities of total and free fluoride ions released from four resin-based composites containing fluoride (Heliomolar (HE), UniFil S (UF), Beautifil (BE) and Reactmer paste (RP)) and one glass ionomer cement (Ketac-Fil Plus Aplicap (KF)). METHODS: Five disk specimens of each material were prepared and the fluoride release was measured at 1, 2, 4, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days. The amounts of total and free fluoride ions released from materials were measured by using an ion-selective electrode (ISE) and ion chromatography (IC). Data were statistically analyzed using a t-test at a significant level of 0.05. RESULTS: For HE, fluoride release is undetectable using the ISE but was detected by the IC method. There were no significant differences in the free and total fluoride ions released from UF and BE (p>0.05). For RP, the free fluoride ions were significantly lower than the total fluoride ions after 4 days (p<0.05). KF showed significant difference between total and free fluoride ions at 7 and 28 days (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The nature of the fluoride incorporated into dental materials affected the amounts of free and total fluoride ions released from materials.     

Study of the fluoridated adhesive resin cement--fluoride release, fluoride uptake and acid resistance of tooth structures.

The objectives of this study, were to evaluate the fluoride release from fluoridate adhesive resin cement, fluoride uptake into surrounding tooth structures and the effect of their acid resistance. Several specimens were prepared using a plastic ring mould, from extracted human premolars, and prepared from enamel and dentin of the central area of the buccal surface of bovine teeth. The fluoride release rate of fluoridate adhesive resin cement (PN 200) per day was higher than other materials during the 7-day study period. Fluoride released and fluoride uptake by tooth structures was higher in the fluoridate adhesive resin cement. WDX analysis showed the fluoride concentration on dentin contact area was higher than that of enamel after 60 days of immersion in deionized water. The calcium release values were similar for enamel and dentin plates in the various test materials. The present findings indicated the important enhancement of tooth structure acid resistance by fluoridate material.     

Fluoride release from orthodontic band cements-a comparison of two in vitro models

Objectives. To compare, in vitro, the fluoride release from a conventional glass ionomer cement (Ketac-Cem), a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (3M-Multicure) and a polyacid modified composite (Ultra Band-Lok) using a banded tooth model and a disc model with the same mean cement weight.Methods. Forty pairs of caries-free third molars were collected and divided into two groups, each of 20 teeth. One tooth from each pair was banded with Ketac-Cem and the other with Ultra Band-Lok or 3M-Multicure; the average band size for each cement group was the same. Two coats of nail varnish were painted on each tooth to within 1mm of the band margin. Five discs (4.5mm diameter and 2mm depth) were prepared for each cement, these dimensions having been calculated so that the mean cement weight of the banded tooth model matched that of the disc model for each cement. The fluoride released into 2ml of deionised water, from each banded tooth or disc, was measured at regular intervals over 30 days using an Orion ion-selective electrode connected to an ion analyser.Results. At 30 days, for both banded tooth and disc models, the mean cumulative fluoride release was greatest from 3M-Multicure followed by Ketac-Cem, which in turn released more fluoride than Ultra Band-Lok. These differences were all significant (p<0.05). Despite having the same mean cement weight, the banded tooth model for Ketac-Cem and 3M-Multicure released approximately 3-4 times more cumulative fluoride than the disc model after 30 days (p<001). For Ultra Band-Lok, both models released comparable levels of fluoride (p>0.05).Conclusions. Cement type, specimen geometry and surface area appear to influence significantly fluoride release characteristics.     

Evaluation of a new 2-paste glass ionomer cement

A new 2-paste resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement, Fuji Ortho Band Paste Pak (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), for the placement of orthodontic bands, has been developed for easier handling. The aim of this study was to compare the fluoride release and uptake characteristics of this cement with that of 3 others commonly used to cement orthodontic bands: a conventional resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement, a polyacid-modified composite resin, and a conventional glass ionomer cement. Fluoride release was measured during a 28-day period. After the measurement on day 28, experimental samples were exposed to 1000 ppm sodium fluoride solution for 5 minutes, and fluoride release was then measured for 7 days. Initially, the new 2-paste resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement released the greatest amount of fluoride; the polyacid-modified composite resin released the least initially, and it continued to show the lowest values throughout the study. The fluoride uptake and release values of the new 2-paste resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement were statistically significantly higher than those of the conventional resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement or the conventional glass ionomer cement. The new 2-paste resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement might be a good alternative to conventional products for cementing orthodontic bands.     

Long-term F release from glass ionomer cements

Fluoride release from three commercial glass ionomer filling cements and three glass ionomer luting cements was measured in the laboratory over a 12-month period. Fluoride release from these glass ionomer cements was compared with that released from a silicate, silicophosphate, and a fluoride-containing polycarboxylate cement. The fluoride released from the glass ionomer cements throughout the one-year period was similar, both in quantity and pattern, to that released by the silicate cement. The silicophosphate cement tended to release fluoride in somewhat lesser amounts, while the amount of fluoride released by the polycarboxylate was negligible after the first few days. Analysis of these data indicates that these glass ionomer cements probably possess anticariogenic properties similar to those of silicate cement.     

Long-term fluoride release from a glass ionomer cement,a compomer,and from experimental resin composites

The aqueous phase of glass ionomer cements enables fluoride ions to diffuse and to be released from the material. The matrix of resin composites is much less hydrophilic, and fluoride incorporated in the material is only released in small amounts. It was the purpose of the present work to study the influence of resin matrix formulation on the fluoride release from experimental, fluoride-containing resin composites. The resin composites were based on methacrylate monomers and the adduct of maleic anhydride and HEMA (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate). The resin composites contained 1 w% or 5 w% of AlF3*3H2O. A glass ionomer cement and a compomer were used as controls. Five disks of each material were stored in distilled water at room temperature. By means of a fluoride sensitive electrode, the fluoride release from disk-shaped specimens was determined periodically over 3 years. The glass ionomer cement released the most fluoride (1.54 +/- 4 microg/cm2 after 1 year and 248 +/- 7 microg/cm2 after 3 years). The compomer released relatively little fluoride during the 1st year (30 +/- 1 microg/cm2) but after this time the rate of fluoride release became equal to that of the glass ionomer cement, resulting in a release of 122 +/- 8 microg/cm2 after 3 years. Regarding the resin composites, the fluoride release increased with the hydrophilicity and the acid character of the polymer matrix. The release, however, was significantly lower than that from the glass ionomer cement and the compomer and ranged from 1.2 +/- 0.07 to 42 +/- 3.9 microg/cm2 at 1 year and from 2.3 +/- 0.16 to 79 +/- 6 microg/cm2 at 3 years.     

Effect of curing method and storage condition on fluoride ion release from a fluoride-releasing resin cement

The purpose of this study was to evaluate fluoride ion release from a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Fuji IILC improved, FLC) and a fluoridated resin cement (Panavia F, PF) following different curing methods and storage conditions. The specimens, which were either light-cured (LC) or chemical-cured (CC), were stored in either distilled water (DW) or demineralizing solution (DS; pH 4.5) for 1, 3, 7, 15, 30, 60, and 90 days. Fluoride ion release was measured using a fluoride ion-specific electrode. Data (n = 5) were statistically analyzed using one- and three-way ANOVA (p = 0.05). A "burst effect" was observed in the first week from both materials. However, fluoride ion release from FLC was seven times higher than that from PF. Storage in demineralizing solution accelerated the amount of fluoride release from both materials. In addition, LC yielded a lower amount of fluoride ion release from both materials, as compared to CC. It was concluded that both curing mode and storage medium influenced the amount of fluoride release from the tested materials.     

A comparative study of fluoride uptake from dentin bonding agents and glass-ionomer cements in permanent and primary tooth enamel.

OBJECTIVE: Many fluoride-releasing dental materials are being sold on the basis of their cariostatic properties. However, the amount of fluoride release of these materials is still uncertain. The aim of this study was to determine the amount of fluoride uptake in primary and permanent tooth enamel from 1 conventional glass-ionomer cement (Fuji II), 1 resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (Fuji II LC), and 2 fluoride-releasing dentin bonding agents (Liner Bond 2 and Optibond) in vitro. METHOD AND MATERIALS: One hundred sixty caries-free primary and permanent molar teeth were assigned to the study. Materials were applied according to the manufacturer's instructions to standard windows created on the enamel surfaces. The amount of fluoride uptake by enamel was investigated by using a specific fluoride electrode and acid-etching biopsy technique. RESULTS: The amount of fluoride taken up from Fuji II and Fuji II LC by permanent and primary tooth enamel was found to be statistically significant. However, no significant fluoride uptake from Optibond and Liner Bond 2 was found. CONCLUSION: Fuji II and Fuji II LC glass-ionomer materials seemed to provide more effective fluoride release than did Optibond and Liner Bond 2 in permanent and primary enamel.     

Surface roughness and weight loss of esthetic restorative materials related to fluoride release and uptake.

The objective of this study was to assess the surface roughness of eight esthetic restorative materials and the relationship with weight changes during fluoride release and uptake. Five specimens each of ChemFil Superior, Fuji IX Dyract, Fuji II LC, Vitremer, Photac-Fil, Ketac-Silver, and Z100 (control) were prepared and immersed in 2 ml of artificial saliva at 37 degrees C. The changes in specimen weight and fluoride release were monitored for 12 weeks. This protocol was repeated after recharging the specimens with 1.23% APF gel for 12 more weeks. The immersed and fresh specimens for each material were then examined with SEM and surface profilometry. There was a significant weight loss for all glass ionomer cements following APF gel application (P < 0.01), which correlated with fluoride release (r = 0.89-0.98). Mean roughness (Ra) measurements and SEM showed that roughness increased from the resin composite to the conventional glass ionomer cements. The marked erosive effect of APF gel on glass ionomer restorations could increase surface colonization by plaque micro-organisms, and reduce the longevity of the restorations.     

Effect of a neutral citrate solution on the fluoride release of conventional restorative glass ionomer cements.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigates the effect of a neutral citrate solution on the fluoride release of 10 acid-base setting glass ionomer cements during 140 days at 37 degrees C. METHODS: Five disks of 10 acid-base setting restorative glass ionomers were prepared according to the manufacturer's instructions. These specimens were immersed individually in 25 ml of a 0.01 mol/l citrate solution with pH = 7. Over 140 days, the solutions were regularly renewed and the fluoride concentration eluted during each period was determined with a combined fluoride ion selective electrode. RESULTS: The cumulative fluoride release was the result of an initial high release that ceased after some time and a long-term of low fluoride release. The long-term fluoride release was higher in neutral citrate solution than in water. For some formulations the short-term fluoride release also was higher in neutral citrate solution than in water suggesting that the polysalt matrix composition could be important in this respect. SIGNIFICANCE: The fluoride release process is due not only to a loss of relatively loosely bound fluoride in the cement matrix, but also to the release of strongly bounded fluoride inducing a long-term fluoride release. The effect of citrate on the fluoride release process may increase depending on the acid (polyacrylic acid versus copolymers of polyacrylic acid) used for the polysalt formation in the hardening cement. Depending on the competition between the polyacrylate anion and the citrate anion for the metal cation extraction the fluoride release process may be retarded.