Married men's first time experiences of early childbearing and their role in sexual and reproductive decision making: a qualitative study from rural Vietnam

Male partners' involvement in women's sexual and reproductive health has been increasingly emphasised in international health. A qualitative approach with open-ended qualitative interviews was used to explore young, married men's first time experiences of early childbearing, their sexual and reproductive decision making and the meanings they make of their role as husbands and fathers. The results offer a nuanced picture of the men's vulnerability in becoming young fathers and having to assume their role as family decision-makers, while still being inexperienced in matters related to the health of their wives and newborn child. Constraints to gender equality and traditional norms and values continue to pose barriers to both young men and women making independent decisions in relation to marriage and childbearing. Men's involvement is necessary in healthcare programmes designed to improve women's sexual and reproductive health and the health of the newborn. Young, first-time fathers, in particular, need support and empowerment.     

Evaluating men's involvement as a strategy in sexual and reproductive health promotion

Nearly 10 years has passed since the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development recognized men as legitimate targets for sexual and reproductive health promotion. This recognition was born of the experience of many health promoting agencies in the 1980s and 1990s who realized that without working with men, change would be very difficult or impossible. It was proposed that men should be involved because their active participation was crucial to the success of programs and to the empowerment of women. However, the idea that men should play an active role in health promotion has not been without its critics, who have posed serious questions about the efficacy of involving men and the effects their involvement would have on women and children. In an effort to examine the lessons learned from men's involvement, this paper reviews published evaluations of interventions that have targeted heterosexual men. Twenty-four studies that met the criteria for inclusion (reported on interventions in areas of sexual and reproductive health that targeted heterosexual men and contained evaluation data) were found. From their review of these studies, the authors suggest that there is some evidence that the use of media approaches may be a successful strategy and that there may be some problems with the application of some cognitive behavior change approaches. However, the fact that few interventions have targeted heterosexual men and have been the subject for detailed evaluation suggests that there is a need for more interventions and better evaluations, which would examine not only the process of men's involvement, but also their impact on the lives of both the men themselves and their families. The reality is that although perhaps no longer regarded as part of the problem, men have yet to be seen as part of the solution.     

Contraceptive decision-making in sexual relationships: young men's experiences,attitudes and values

Much attention has been focused on efforts to reduce unintended pregnancy by improving contraceptive use among high-risk women; however, there is limited information to guide interventions to engage young men in contraceptive decision-making. We conducted focus groups of young men, aged 19–26, from diverse racial backgrounds from low-income communities in the San Francisco Bay Area to examine social norms about sexual relationships and how they impact on contraceptive use. The data were analysed using content analysis. A range of relationships were described, however casual relationships predominated. While young men expressed strong desires to avoid pregnancy in casual relationships, the unpredictable nature of relationships, together with low communication and regard for the women involved, made stressing consistent contraceptive use among partners unlikely. The themes expressed by these young men about sex and behaviour in different relationships illustrate a spectrum of decision-making dilemmas and illustrate the inherent difficulty in fully engaging young men in contraceptive decision-making. A strategy is needed to address relationship values, dynamics and condom use beyond STI-prevention frameworks and young women's ability to make appropriate contraceptive choices in light of the inherent difficulties and uncertainty associated with casual relationships.     

Evidence and decision making: tobacco control policy and legislation in Vietnam

The Ministry of Health (MOH) in Vietnam is currently drafting the Tobacco Harm Prevention Law. The government requested the MOH to provide evidence on the strategies proposed in the draft law as part of its submission to the National Assembly. This study examines the availability and strength of evidence and its relationship to policy stakeholders' positions towards policy instruments proposed in the law. Several qualitative methods were employed including documentary analysis, key informant interviews, focus group discussion and a key stakeholders' survey. Contradictory findings were identified over the role of evidence. While there is high demand for local evidence, the availability and strength of evidence are not always aligned with stakeholders' positions with respect to different strategies. Stakeholders' positions are shaped by competing interests on the basis of their perceptions of the socioeconomic implications and health consequences of tobacco control. Claims of limited availability of evidence are often used to justify the maintenance of the status quo, a position that is seen to protect the state‐owned tobacco industry and state revenue. Local evidence of the impact of tobacco on population health is argued to be ‘one‐sided’ and evidence of selected interventions discounted. Compelling and comprehensive local evidence, including those addressing economic concerns, is acutely needed in order to proceed with the current legislation process. For evidence to play a critical role, it needs to engage those ministries responsible for the tobacco industry itself and the economic development. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Views of treatment decision making from adolescents with chronic illnesses and their parents: a pilot study

Objective Shared decision making may increase satisfaction with health care and improve outcomes, but little is known about adolescents’ decision‐making preferences. The primary purpose of this study is to describe the decision‐making preferences of adolescents with chronic illnesses and their parents, and the extent to which they agree. Design Survey. Setting and participants Participants were 82 adolescents seen at one of four paediatric chronic illness subspecialty clinics and 62 of their parents. Main variables Predictor variables include sociodemographics, health parameters, risk behaviour, and physical and cognitive development. The main outcome variable is preferences for decision‐making style. Results and conclusions When collapsed into three response categories, nearly equal percentages of adolescents (37%) and parents (36%) preferred shared decision making. Overall, the largest proportion of adolescents (46%) and parents (53%) preferred passive decision making compared to active or shared decision making. Across five response choices, 33% of pairs agreed. Agreement was slight and not significant. Improved general health perceptions (OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.59–0.99) and improved behaviour (OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.56–0.99) were significantly associated with parents’ preferences for less active decision making. Older age was significantly associated with agreement (OR 1.58, 95% CI = 1.09–2.30) between parents and adolescents. The paucity of significant predictor variables may indicate physicians need to inquire directly about patient and parent preferences.     

Shared decision making in consultations for hypertension: Qualitative study in general practice

BackgroundHypertension is mainly managed in primary care. Shared decision making is widely recommended as an approach to treatment decision making. However, no studies have investigated; in detail, what happens during primary care consultations for hypertension.AimTo understand patients’ and clinicians’ experience of shared decision making for hypertension in primary care, in order to propose how it might be better supported.DesignLongitudinal qualitative study.SettingFive general practices in south‐west England.MethodInterviews with a purposive sample of patients with hypertension, and with the health‐care practitioners they consulted, along with observations of clinical consultations, for up to 6 appointments. Interviews and consultations were audio‐recorded and observational field notes taken. Data were analysed thematically.ResultsForty‐six interviews and 18 consultations were observed, with 11 patients and nine health‐care practitioners (five GPs, one pharmacist and three nurses). Little shared decision making was described by participants or observed. Often patients’ understanding of their hypertension was limited, and they were not aware there were treatment choices. Consultations provided few opportunities for patients and clinicians to reach a shared understanding of their treatment choices. Opportunities for patients to engage in choices were limited by structured consultations and the distribution of decisions across consultations.ConclusionFor shared decision making to be better supported, consultations need to provide opportunities for patients to learn about their condition, to understand that there are treatment choices, and to discuss these choices with clinicians.Patient or Public ContributionA patient group contributed to the design of this study.     

Riverina men's study: An exploration of rural men's attitudes to health and body image

Aim:  To determine the attitudes of rural men to matters of health and body image.
Methods:  Focus group discussions were used to examine the attitudes of a sample of Australian rural men to matters of health and body image in the context of their eating and exercise behaviours. Forty-two rural men, aged 25–64 years, took part in four focus groups, one exclusively for farmers, in south-western New South Wales (NSW).
Results:  Results from these focus groups reveal that many of the masculine myths surrounding male behaviour in relation to health and ideas on body image persist among rural men in south-western NSW. Talking about health is not considered a male past-time; visiting health professionals is still seen as a last resort; being a 'big bloke' is perceived to be advantageous and heavy drinking is still considered an Australian male domain, especially among the younger men in the groups.
Conclusion:  The present study provides a deeper understanding of rural men's attitudes to body image issues and lifestyle behaviours, which is critical to helping change health outcomes for this hard-to-reach group.     

Women's reproductive decision making and abortion experiences in Cape Town,South Africa: A qualitative study

ABSTRACT

Unintended pregnancy is a significant public health issue in South Africa. Despite free services including contraception, women face structural and institutional barriers to accessing care. This qualitative study comprised interviews with 16 women aged 18 to 40 years and receiving post-abortion services at a public clinic in Cape Town. Data analysis revealed three main themes: personal journeys in seeking abortion, contraceptive experiences, and contrasting feelings of empowerment (in reproductive decision making) and disempowerment (in the health care system). Women perceived themselves as solely responsible for their reproductive health, but found it difficult to obtain adequate information or services.     

The structural influence of family and parenting on young people's sexual and reproductive health in rural northern Tanzania

This paper explores the structural role of the family and parenting in young people's sexual and reproductive health. The study involved eight weeks of participant observation, 26 in-depth interviews, and 11 group discussions with young people aged 14–24 years, and 20 in-depth interviews and 6 group discussions with parents/carers of children in this age group. At an individual level, parenting and family structure were found to affect young people's sexual behaviour by influencing children's self-confidence and interactional competence, limiting discussion of sexual health and shaping economic provision for children, which in turn affected parental authority and daughters' engagement in risky sexual behaviour. Sexual norms are reproduced both through parents' explicit prohibitions and their own behaviours. Girls are socialised to accept men's superiority, which shapes their negotiation of sexual relationships. Interventions to improve young people's sexual and reproductive health should recognise the structural effects of parenting, both in terms of direct influences on children and the dynamics by which structural barriers such as gendered power relations and cultural norms around sexuality are transmitted across generations.     

Adolescent pregnancy and young motherhood in rural Zimbabwe: Findings from a baseline study

Pregnant adolescents and young mothers comprise a vulnerable group, particularly in low and middle income countries, yet there is limited research describing this population, particularly in rural Zimbabwe. Using tablet-administered questionnaires concerning maternal and child health, sexual and reproductive health, psychosocial well-being and parenting, we recruited 442 pregnant and young mothers (14–24 years) with the support of social workers from health facilities. We found high levels of poverty amidst increased rates of marriage, including child marriage (almost 20%). Participants had poor sexual and reproductive health knowledge and uptake of contraception was low (only 35% respondents reported current use). Although almost 60% girls had completed Form 2, 24% had only completed Grade 1 and just 4% were still engaged in schooling. Girls reported inadequate social support amidst high caretaking responsibilities and change in relocation for marriage, compromising mental health. Most of the pregnancies were unintended (approximately 60%) which had consequences on attachment and parenting where roughly 40% of our sample reported difficulties and lack of enjoyment in caring for their babies. Investments in interventions that address these vulnerabilities for pregnant adolescents and young mothers, and capitalise on available resources, are critical to improve health and interrupt cycles of risk for the next generation.     

农村地区生殖健康/计划生育服务质量评估

目的 了解农村地区育龄男女对生殖健康／计划生育服务的利用情况和相关知识、态度、行为及保健需求。方法 采用定性研究的方法，于2001年对安徽、广东、青海、重庆4省(市)8个村的105名育龄男女分成16个小组进行专题小组讨论。结果 农村育龄妇女孕产期保健情况较好；村级孕产妇大多在乡镇卫生院分娩；妇女产后多采用宫内节育器避孕。育龄妇女中分别有72．5％，35．3％和70．6％的人了解有关生殖道感染／性传播疾病的传播途径、危害和预防措施。获取生殖健康知识的最佳形式是与医生和保健人员面对面地交流与咨询。结论 应加强孕产期保健工作，提高农村孕产妇的住院分娩率；为农村育龄男女提供完善的计划生育指导；并通过多种形式的健康教育，促进农村群众生殖健康水平的提高。     

Sustainable partnerships for integrated care: the role of decision making and its environment

This paper is intended to further the understanding of the role of the characteristics of decision making and its environment in the development of sustainable partnerships in health care, and to illustrate how this subject can be studied from a combined theoretical and methodological perspective. With the aid of a conceptual model covering sensitizing concepts from contingency theory (that refer to environmental characteristics--particularly institutions--the process course of decision making and its outcomes) and the case study methodology (explanation-building, triangulation, document study and interviews), two Dutch cases were analysed. The findings indicate which environmental characteristics are responsible for the differences in the process course and outcomes between the cases.     

A design process for using normative models in shared decision making: a case study in the context of prenatal testing

Background

Shared decision making (SDM) encourages the patient to play a more active role in the process of medical consultation and its primary objective is to find the best treatment for a specific patient. Recent findings, however, show that patient preferences cannot be easily or accurately judged on the basis of communicative exchange during routine office visits, even for patients who seek to expand their role in medical decision making (MDM).

Objective

The objective of this study is to improve the quality of patient–physician communication by developing a novel design process for SDM and then demonstrating, through a case study, the applicability of this process in enabling the use of a normative model for a specific medical situation.

Design

Our design process goes through the following stages: definition of medical situation and decision problem, development/identification of normative model, adaptation of normative model, empirical analysis and development of decision support systems (DSS) tools that facilitate the SDM process in the specific medical situation.

Case study

This study demonstrates the applicability of the process through the implementation of the general normative theory of MDM under uncertainty for the medical–financial dilemma of choosing a physician to perform amniocentesis.

Discussion

The use of normative models in SDM raises several issues, such as the goal of the normative model, the relation between the goals of prediction and recommendation, and the general question of whether it is valid to use a normative model for people who do not behave according to the model''s assumptions.