Polymerase chain reaction monitoring reduces the incidence of cytomegalovirus disease and the duration and side effects of antiviral therapy after bone marrow transplantation

Culture-based preemptive therapy with ganciclovir was shown to reduce the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease after bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Culture techniques did not detect CMV in 12% to 13% of patients before the onset of CMV disease. In a prospective study, 71 patients either received preemptive therapy based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique (37 patients) or on culture assays (34 patients). In both groups, therapy was continued until clinical signs disappeared and PCR negativity was documented. Twenty- two patients in the PCR group and 15 patients in the culture group received antiviral therapy. PCR allowed detection of the virus (median day, +32 v day +49; P = .006) and introduction of antiviral therapy (median day, +44 v day +54; P = .02) earlier than did culture assays. The incidences of CMV disease (2 of 37 v 8 of 34 in PCR group v culture group, respectively; P = .02) and CMV-associated mortality (0 of 37 v 5 of 34 in PCR group v culture group, respectively; P = .02) were decreased, and the duration of ganciclovir therapy (P < .001) was shorter in the PCR-monitored group. Incidence and median duration of severe neutropenia (less than 500/microL) were lower in the PCR group (two v eight episodes, P = .02; median duration, 1.5 v 5 days, P = .04), as was the incidence of nonviral infections during/after antiviral therapy (2 of 37 v 9 of 34; P = .012). Thus, preemptive therapy based on more sensitive detection methods such as the PCR assay reduces the incidence of CMV disease and CMV-related mortality. Additionally, stopping and withholding antiviral therapy in a PCR- negative patient is safe and allows reduction of the duration and side effects of antiviral therapy.     

A randomised trial comparing cytomegalovirus antigenemia assay vs screening bronchoscopy for the early detection and prevention of disease in allogeneic bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell transplant recipients

Preemptive antiviral therapy is often employed for CMV prevention following allogeneic BMT. Two common strategies are a screening bronchoscopy for CMV post-BMT or regular CMV antigenemia testing with ganciclovir administration for a positive result. In a randomised trial, we prospectively compared the efficacy of these two preemptive strategies. Consecutive patients were randomised to either a bronchoscopy for CMV on day 35 post BMT or weekly CMV antigenemia testing. If the bronchoscopy was positive for CMV, patients received preemptive ganciclovir for 8-10 weeks. If the antigenemia was positive for CMV, patients received a minimum of 2 weeks of preemptive ganciclovir. The primary endpoint was the development of active CMV disease. One hundred and eighteen allogeneic BMT patients were enrolled (60 in the antigenemia arm and 58 in the bronchoscopy arm). The two groups were comparable with respect to baseline demographic data, underlying disease, conditioning regimen, and immunosuppression. Active CMV disease developed in 7/58 (12.1%) patients in the bronchoscopy arm vs 1/60 patients (1.7%) in the CMV antigenemia arm (P = 0.022). Based on the screening test, 13.8% of patients received preemptive ganciclovir in the bronchoscopy arm vs 48.3% of patients in the antigenemia arm (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the rate of graft-versus-host disease, bacteremia, invasive fungal infections or mortality between the two groups. Preemptive therapy based on regular CMV antigenemia monitoring is superior to screening bronchoscopy for the prevention of CMV disease after allogeneic BMT.     

Recovery of HLA-restricted cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific T-cell responses after allogeneic bone marrow transplant: correlation with CMV disease and effect of ganciclovir prophylaxis

Protection from cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in immunocompromised hosts has been shown to correlate with recovery of the host virus- specific CD8+ T-cell response. The administration of ganciclovir to immunosuppressed transplant recipients as antiviral prophylaxis has reduced the early risk of CMV disease, but late disease is observed with increased frequency, suggesting that recovery of the CMV-specific T-cell responses necessary for protective immunity may be delayed in these patients. Therefore, we evaluated reconstitution of CMV-specific T-cell responses in 47 bone marrow transplant (BMT) recipients entered on a randomized placebo-controlled study of ganciclovir. The study drug was initiated at a mean of 24 days after BMT. At day 30 to 40, a minority of patients had recovery of T-cell immunity to CMV and the frequency of reconstitution was equivalent in patients randomized to ganciclovir or placebo. The failure of ganciclovir to effect early reconstitution may reflect the short duration of treatment. Early recovery was associated with the infusion of BM from a CMV seropositive donor (P = .07 for CD8+ cytotoxic T cell (CTL), P = .04 for CD4+ Th). Between day 40 and day 90, recovery of deficient CD8+ and CD4+ CMV- specific T-cell responses occurred in the majority of individuals that received placebo, but in a minority of ganciclovir recipients. Two cases of late-onset CMV disease occurred in ganciclovir recipients. In all patients, the presence of a CTL response to CMV conferred protection from subsequent CMV disease (P = .005), and these protective CTL responses are shown to be specific for structural virion proteins similar to the responses in immunocompetent CMV seropositive individuals. These data confirm the importance of CMV-specific T-cell responses and suggest that a delay in recovery of these responses as a result of ganciclovir prophylaxis may contribute to the occurrence of late CMV disease.     

Randomized multicenter trial of foscarnet versus ganciclovir for preemptive therapy of cytomegalovirus infection after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

The present study compared foscarnet with ganciclovir for preemptive therapy of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after allogeneic blood or marrow stem cell transplantation (SCT). Patients with CMV infection, as detected by weekly antigenemia or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in blood leukocytes, were randomized to intravenous therapy for 2 weeks with either foscarnet at 60 mg/kg or ganciclovir at 5 mg/kg administered every 12 hours; if CMV infection remained detectable, patients received an additional 2 weeks of intravenous foscarnet at 90 mg/kg or ganciclovir at 6 mg/kg given once daily for 5 days per week, after which therapy was stopped. Primary efficacy endpoint was the occurrence of CMV disease or death from any cause within 180 days after SCT. A total of 213 patients were treated with either foscarnet (n = 110) or ganciclovir (n = 103). Kaplan-Meier estimates of event-free survival within 180 days after SCT were similar in the 2 treatment groups (P =.6). During study treatment, severe neutropenia (< 0.5 x 10(9)/L) occurred in 11 (11%) patients on ganciclovir versus 4 (4%) patients on foscarnet (P =.04), and impaired renal function was observed in 5 (5%) patients on foscarnet versus 2 (2%) patients on ganciclovir (P =.4). Neutropenia or thrombocytopenia required discontinuation of ganciclovir in 6 (6%) patients but in no foscarnet-treated patient (P =.03). After allogeneic SCT, preemptive therapy of CMV infection with foscarnet shows similar efficacy as with ganciclovir, but is associated with a lower proportion of patients who develop severe neutropenia and who require discontinuation of antiviral therapy due to hematotoxicity.     

Risk-Adapted Preemptive Therapy for Cytomegalovirus Disease after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience in Korea

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains a major cause of infection in recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT) and results in significant mortality and morbidity. We present the results of CMV pp65 antigenemia-guided, risk-adapted preemptive therapy aimed at preventing CMV disease in allogeneic HSCT. Preemptive ganciclovir treatment was started when more than 5 CMV antigen-positive cells were detected in the low-risk group (with grade 0-I acute GVHD and matched related HSCT) and when any antigen-positive cells were seen in the high-risk group (with grade II-IV acute GVHD or matched unrelated HSCT). At least 1 episode of antigenemia was observed in 53 (59.6%) of 89 patients before day 100, and preemptive therapy was performed in 33 patients. CMV disease occurred in 6 patients (5 in the high-risk group and 1 in the low-risk group), and late CMV disease developed in 4 patients. Only 1 patient died of CMV pneumonitis before day 100. Neutropenia was observed in 51.5% of ganciclovir-treated patients, and coinfection/superinfection was observed in 42.4%. A strategy of ganciclovir treatment focusing on patients at higher risk could reduce the toxicity from the antiviral drug and be cost-effective. Extended surveillance for CMV disease using more sensitive diagnostic methods is necessary in high-risk patients.     

Management of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in liver transplant recipients

Cytomegalovirus(CMV) is one of the most common viral pathogens causing clinical disease in liver transplant recipients, and contributing to substantial morbidity and occasional mortality. CMV causes febrile illness often accompanied by bone marrow suppression, and in some cases, invades tissues including the transplanted liver allograft. In addition, CMV has been significantly associated with an increased predisposition to acute and chronic allograft rejection, accelerated hepatitis C recurrence, and other opportunistic infections, as well as reduced overall patient and allograft survival. To negate the adverse effects of CMV infection on transplant outcome, its prevention, whether through antiviral prophylaxis or preemptive therapy, is an essential component to the management of liver transplant recipients. Two recently updated guidelines have suggested that antiviral prophylaxis or preemptive therapy are similarly effective in preventing CMV disease in modest-risk CMV-seropositive liver transplant recipients, while antiviral prophylaxis is the preferredstrategy over preemptive therapy for the prevention of CMV disease in high-risk recipients [CMV-seronegative recipients of liver allografts from CMV-seropositive donors(D+/R-)]. However, antiviral prophylaxis has only delayed the onset of CMV disease in many CMV D+/Rliver transplant recipients, and such occurrence of lateonset CMV disease was significantly associated with increased all-cause and infection-related mortality after liver transplantation. Therefore, a search for better strategies for prevention, such as prolonged duration of antiviral prophylaxis, a hybrid approach(antiviral prophylaxis followed by preemptive therapy), or the use of immunologic measures to guide antiviral prophylaxis has been suggested to prevent late-onset CMV disease. The standard treatment of CMV disease consists of intravenous ganciclovir or oral valganciclovir, and if feasible, reduction in pharmacologic immunosuppression. In one clinical trial, oral valganciclovir was as effective as intravenous ganciclovir for the treatment of mild to moderate CMV disease in solid organ(including liver) transplant recipients. The aim of this article is to provide a state-of-the art review of the epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of CMV infection and disease after liver transplantation.     

Cidofovir for cytomegalovirus infection and disease in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients. The Infectious Diseases Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

A retrospective study was performed to collect information regarding efficacy and toxicity of cidofovir (CDV) in allogeneic stem cell transplant patients. Data were available on 82 patients. The indications for therapy were cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in 20 patients, primary preemptive therapy in 24 patients, and secondary preemptive therapy in 38 patients. Of the patients, 47 had received previous antiviral therapy with ganciclovir, foscarnet, or both drugs. The dosage of CDV was 1 to 5 mg/kg per week followed by maintenance every other week in some patients. The duration of therapy ranged from 1 to 134 days (median, 22 days). All patients received probenecid and prehydration. Ten of 20 (50%) patients who were treated for CMV disease (9 of 16 with pneumonia) responded to CDV therapy, as did 25 of 38 (66%) patients who had failed or relapsed after previous preemptive therapy and 15 of 24 (62%) patients in whom CDV was used as the primary preemptive therapy. Of the patients, 21 (25.6%) developed renal toxicity that remained after cessation of therapy in 12 patients. Fifteen patients developed other toxicities that were potentially due to CDV or the concomitantly given probenecid. No toxicity was seen in 45 (61.6%) patients. Cidofovir can be considered as second-line therapy in patients with CMV disease failing previous antiviral therapy. However, additional studies are needed before CDV can be recommended for preemptive therapy.     

Evaluation of the COBAS Amplicor HCMV Monitor for early detection and monitoring of human cytomegalovirus infection after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Early diagnosis of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection and the introduction of preemptive antiviral therapy have reduced HCMV-related mortality after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. A critical goal remains stratifying risk profiles and minimizing potential harm owing to antiviral overtreatment. We compared the commercially available standardized COBAS Amplicor CMV Monitor (CACM) to an in-house PCR assay, for the monitoring of HCMV infection. Seventy-two patients were surveyed by an in-house PCR of whole blood, quantitative viral load assessment by CACM and virus culture assays in a prospective and a retrospective study. A high concordance between CACM and PCR was documented. The viral load at onset correlated with the peak viral load (Spearman rank correlation R=0.634, P=0.0004). In patients developing HCMV disease, both viral loads were in trend higher (P=0.823, respectively P=0.053), and the viremic episodes longer (P=0.015), as compared to asymptomatically HCMV-infected patients. The serological pre-transplant status was the major risk factor for the development of HCMV disease, showing highest risk for seropositive patients receiving a seronegative graft, whereas donor type (related or unrelated) and graft type (bone marrow or peripheral blood mobilized stem cells) did not have an influence. HCMV infection proved to be a risk factor for the development of non-viral opportunistic infections (P=0.002).     

Prevention of cytomegalovirus infection and disease after lung transplantation: results using a unique regimen employing delayed ganciclovir

BACKGROUND: Many lung transplant programs employ lengthy regimens of IV ganciclovir therapy to prevent disease due to cytomegalovirus (CMV). In 1994, we introduced a regimen of delayed ganciclovir prophylaxis for CMV infection. This consisted of 2 weeks of IV ganciclovir therapy, initiated 3 to 4 weeks after transplantation, with subsequent viral monitoring and preemptive therapy as needed. When not receiving ganciclovir, patients received oral acyclovir, 800 mg tid, for 6 months. CMV-seronegative patients with seropositive donors also received four doses of CMV hyperimmune globulin. This study analyzes the CMV outcomes of 54 patients who received the delayed regimen compared to 33 historical control subjects who received only acyclovir prophylaxis (n = 28) or oral acyclovir and 2 to 4 weeks of ganciclovir early after transplantation (n = 5). METHODS: CMV detection was by shell vial culture or IgG seroconversion; after 1996, CMV detection was by blood antigenemia. The diagnosis of CMV disease also required a typical clinical syndrome or pathologic evidence of CMV. The main outcome was the actuarial incidence of CMV infection and disease. In order to account for the effect of other important risk factors for CMV infection, the time to CMV infection and disease was also studied as dependeant variables in a Cox proportional-hazard analysis, with the delayed regimen and other important risk factors as independent variables. RESULTS: The delayed regimen reduced the actuarial incidence of CMV infection from 80 to 48% (p < 0.001) and CMV disease from 31 to 10% (p < 0.01). No seropositive patient receiving the delayed regimen developed CMV disease. Twelve of the 54 patients in the study group required additional IV antiviral treatment, but the total use of ganciclovir averaged only 18 days per patient. In a Cox proportional-hazards model, the use of delayed ganciclovir was the only factor that showed a significant association with freedom from CMV infection (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24 to 0.75; p = 0.003) and CMV disease (HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.86; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: A regimen of CMV prophylaxis employing 2 weeks of IV ganciclovir initiated 3 to 4 weeks after lung transplantation followed by virologic monitoring and preemptive therapy as needed provides good protection against CMV disease.     

Clinical features of late cytomegalovirus infection after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Late cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease beyond day 100 after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has become an increasing problem after the introduction of preemptive ganciclovir (GCV) administration. To clarify the risk factors and outcome for late CMV reactivation and disease, we retrospectively analyzed the records of 101 Japanese adult patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT between 1998 and 2005 at our hospital. Fifty-one developed late positive CMV antigenemia, with a cumulative incidence of 53%. Recipient CMV seropositivity, the use of alemtuzumab, chronic GVHD, and high-dose steroids were significantly associated with late positive antigenemia. Eight patients developed late CMV disease, with a cumulative incidence of 8%, including retinitis and gastrointestinal disease. None progressed to a fatal disease. The use of alemtuzumab was identified as an independent significant risk factor for late CMV disease, although it was not associated with increased non-relapse mortality. Among the 51 patients with late positive antigenemia, 28 had consistently less than three positive cells, 25 of whom showed negative conversion without antiviral agents. In conclusion, late CMV antigenemia appeared to develop frequently, especially in patients with profound immune suppression; however, a fatal outcome could be prevented by optimal preemptive therapy. Low-level antigenemia may not require antiviral treatments.     

Current concepts on cytomegalovirus infection after liver transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common viral pathogen that negatively impacts on the outcome of liver transplantation. CMV cause febrile illness often accompanied by bone marrow suppression, and in some cases, invades tissues including the transplanted allograft. In addition, CMV has been significantly associated with an increased predisposition to allograft rejection, accelerated hepatitis C recurrence, and other opportunistic infections, as well as reduced overall patient and allograft survival. To negate the adverse effects of CMV on outcome, its prevention, whether through antiviral prophylaxis or preemptive therapy, is regarded as an essential component to the medical management of liver transplant patients. Two recent guidelines have suggested that antiviral prophylaxis or preemptive therapy are similarly effective in preventing CMV disease in modest-risk CMV-seropositive liver transplant recipients, while antiviral prophylaxis is the preferred strategy over preemptive therapy for the prevention of CMV disease in high-risk recipients [CMV-seronegative recipients of liver allografts from CMV-seropositive donors (D+/R-)]. However, antiviral prophylaxis has only delayed the onset of CMV disease in many CMV D+/R- liver transplant recipients, and at least in one study, such occurrence of late-onset primary CMV disease was significantly associated with increased mortality after liver transplantation. Therefore, optimized strategies for prevention are needed, and aggressive treatment of CMV infection and disease should be pursued. The standard treatment of CMV disease consists of intravenous ganciclovir or oral valganciclovir, and if feasible, one should also reduce the degree of immunosuppression. In one recent controlled clinical trial, valganciclovir was found to be as effective and safe as intravenous ganciclovir for the treatment of mild to moderate CMV disease in solid organ (including liver) transplant recipients. In this article, the authors review the current state and the future perspectives of prevention and treatment of CMV disease after liver transplantation.     

Sequential cytomegalovirus antigenemia monitoring in kidney transplant patients treated with antilymphocyte antibodies

BACKGROUND: Antilymphocyte antibodies (ALA) use is related to disseminated cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease after kidney transplantation. Strict surveillance of CMV infection, preemptive antiviral treatment or concomitant ganciclovir and ALA use are proposed as an attempt to prevent related clinical complications. Our objective was to describe the pattern of CMV infection, based on sequential antigenemia detection, after ALA treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty renal transplant patients were prospectively screened for CMV infection after ALA treatment. CMV antigenemia (pp65 antigen detection) was monitored twice a week in the first month and weekly until 60 days after the beginning of ALA therapy. Any positive value of antigenemia was considered CMV infection. RESULTS: Twenty-eight (93.3%) patients were CMV positive (IgG) before transplantation. The mean duration of ALA treatment was 12.1+/-2.4 days. Positive antigenemia was detected in 24 (80%) patients, a mean of 52.5+/-15 days after transplant and 44.7+/-14 days after the beginning of ALA treatment. The median antigenemia count was 7 positive cells/300,000 neutrophils (range: 1-227). Antigenemia preceded clinical symptoms by 5.8 days (0-28 days). Eighteen (75%) of 24 positive patients received ganciclovir treatment: 8 patients (26.7%) for viral syndrome, 2 patients (33.3%) for invasive disease, and 8 patients (26.7%) as part of preemptive therapy, asymptomatic with high antigenemia values. Six pp65-positive patients with low counts were followed up until a negative result and remained asymptomatic without any specific treatment. CONCLUSION: CMV infection was frequent after ALA treatment in this group and generally occurred late after completion of treatment. Antigenemia was a reliable tool to guide preemptive treatment in these patients, and such strategy is an alternative option compared to the prophylactic use of ganciclovir with ALA treatment.     

Varicella-zoster infection after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: incidence, risk factors and prevention with low-dose aciclovir and ganciclovir

We examined the incidence of herpes varicella-zoster virus (VZV) infection in 151 patients undergoing allogeneic BMT between August 1990 and September 1997 and who survived at least 3 months. Median follow-up was 17 (range 3.3-80.7) months. Herpes simplex virus antibody positive (HSV+) patients received aciclovir 1200 mg p.o. daily or 750 mg i.v. daily, in divided doses from day 0 to engraftment. Ganciclovir (5 mg/kg i.v. three times per week) was given in CMV+ patients (or if the donor was CMV+) from engraftment to day 84. Ganciclovir was continued or recommenced if a dose of greater than 20 mg of prednisone was used for the treatment of GVHD otherwise aciclovir was recommenced. In HSV+ patients not receiving ganciclovir, aciclovir 600 mg p.o. daily in divided doses was given until at least 6 months after BMT. Thirty-two patients developed VZV infection from 4.1 to 28 months after transplant. The estimated cumulative incidence of VZV was 13% (95% confidence interval 6-19%) at 12 months, 32% (22-42%) at 24 months and 38% (27-50%) at 28 months, with no further cases beyond that time. No patient developed VZV whilst receiving aciclovir or ganciclovir (P < 0.0001). However, there was a rapid onset of VZV following cessation of antiviral therapy (33% (20-46%) at 1 year post cessation). The presence of GVHD and the prior duration of antiviral prophylaxis were significant and independent risk factors for the development of VZV. Age, underlying disease, conditioning therapy or donor type were not. We conclude that 3-6 months of low-dose aciclovir and ganciclovir are effective at delaying the onset of VZV after allogeneic BMT, but may not affect the overall incidence of infection. Prolonged prophylaxis may be warranted in patients at high risk of infection, for example those patients with GVHD.     

Cytomegalovirus infection/disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease has historically been a main cause of death after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Since the introduction of prophylactic or preemptive therapy against CMV, the incidence of CMV disease has been successfully reduced. However, breakthrough CMV disease, particularly CMV gastrointestinal disease, remains one of the major infectious complications. Administration of an antiviral agent, ganciclovir, is often associated with myelotoxicity in HSCT recipients, and delayed immune reconstitution against CMV. Delayed immune reconstitution is a possible cause of the increasing incidence of late (more than 3 months after transplant) CMV disease after HSCT in this era of preemptive therapy. Foscarnet and valganciclovir are the available alternatives to intravenous ganciclovir. Foscarnet is not myelotoxic and has a toxicity profile different from ganciclovir. Valganciclovir, a prodrug of ganciclovir, has a higher bioavailability than oral ganciclovir and could be of clinical use, particularly in the outpatient setting or for patients requiring long-term antiviral therapy. Recent technological developments have enabled the visualization and isolation of CMV-specific T cells. Using these techniques, an individualized approach could be conducted based on each patient’s immune reconstitution against CMV. In this review, we summarize the recent progress and current knowledge of CMV infection and disease after allogeneic HSCT.     

Prevention and treatment of cytomegalovirus infection in organ transplant recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common viral pathogen in organ transplant recipients. The patients at highest risk of developing CMV disease are seronegative recipients of seropositive donors, and seropositive recipients who receive antilymphocyte agents such as OKT3 and antithymocyte globulin (ATG) for induction or for rejection. There have been many trials of CMV prevention, but they are difficult to compare with one another because of variability in definitions and end points. Two modalities that have been used to prevent CMV disease are prophylaxis and preemptive therapy. In prophylaxis all patients are given an antiviral agent in order to prevent CMV disease, while in preemptive therapy (also called targeted prophylaxis) only patients who are identified as ‘high risk’ are selected for treatment. Selected trials of prophylaxis and preemptive therapy in solid-organ recipients are reviewed. The factors to be considered in using one modality or the other are side effects from antivirals, cost of monitoring and antivirals, efficacy of the two modalities, and potential emergence of drug resistance. Sensitive tests that have been used for early diagnosis and monitoring of CMV are antigenemia and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Antigen pp65 is a lower matrix protein and can be detected in peripheral blood leukocytes. The sensitivity and specificity are high and vary from 89% to 100% and 92% to 96%, respectively. Currently, many authors believe that the antigenemia test is more useful than the PCR test. The antigenemia test is useful for viral monitoring as a guide for preemptive therapy after organ transplantation. Persistence of high counts of antigenemia may indicate inadequate antiviral therapy or emergence of resistance. Recurrence of positive antigenemia after treatment of CMV disease can be a sign of relapse. Transplant patients who develop resistance to antiviral drugs are usually seronegative recipients who receive an organ from a seropositive donor and have several courses of antivirals for CMV disease. Ganciclovir is the most frequent antiviral agent used in transplant recipients and is usually well tolerated. Resistance to ganciclovir may occur and is usually secondary to virus mutation in the UL97 gene. The availability of sensitive diagnostic tests such as pp65 antigenemia has made the early diagnosis of CMV possible in organ transplant recipients. CMV is being treated much earlier now, and progression to disseminated disease is uncommon. Prudent use of antiviral drugs will hopefully limit the problem of drug resistance.     

High incidence of ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus infection among lung transplant recipients receiving preemptive therapy.

Preemptive antiviral therapy in transplant patients is thought to be less likely to lead to antiviral resistance than is routine prophylaxis. Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seropositive lung transplant patients (R+) were assigned to receive pp65 antigen-guided ganciclovir therapy, and seronegative recipients of organs from seropositive donors (D+/R-) were assigned to receive initially preemptive and then routine ganciclovir prophylaxis. The incidence of infection with ganciclovir-resistant (ganR) CMV was assessed retrospectively. GanR CMV infection developed in 4 (9%) of 45 patients, at a median of 4.4 months (range, 3.1-6.6 months) after transplantation, and was more common among D+/R- patients than among R+ patients (3 of 11 vs. 1 of 34; P =.04). The incidence among patients who received preemptive therapy was similar to that among patients who received routine prophylaxis. All ganR isolates contained a UL97 mutation. GanR CMV infection occurs in nearly 10% of lung transplant recipients, despite preemptive antiviral therapy, and is more common among D+/R- patients.     

Two strategies for prevention of cytomegalovirus infections after liver transplantation

AIM: To analyze differences in patients' clinical course, we compared two regimes of either preemptive therapy or prophylaxis after liver transplantation.METHODS: This retrospective study was reviewed and approved by the institutional review board of the University of Leipzig. Cytomegalovirus(CMV) prophylaxis with valganciclovir hydrochloride for liver transplant recipients was replaced by a preemptive strategy in October 2009. We retrospectively compared liver transplant recipients 2 years before and after October 2009. During the first period, all patients received valganciclovir daily. During the second period all patients included in the analysis were treated following a preemptive strategy. Outcomes included one year survival and therapeutic intervention due to CMV viremia or infection.RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2010 n = 226 patients underwent liver transplantation in our center. n = 55 patients were D~+/R~- high risk recipients and were excluded from further analysis. A further 43 patients had to be excluded since CMV prophylaxis/preemptive strategy was not followed although there was no clinical reason for the deviation. Of the remaining 128 patients whose data were analyzed, 60 receivedprophylaxis and 68 were treated following a preemptive strategy. The difference in overall mortality was not significant, nor was it significant for one-year mortality where it was 10%(95%CI: 8%-28%, P = 0.31) higher for the preemptive group. No significant differences in blood count abnormalities or the incidence of sepsis and infections were observed other than CMV. In total, 19 patients(14.7%) received ganciclovir due to CMV viremia and/or infections. Patients who were treated according to the preemptive algorithm had a significantly higher rate risk of therapeutic intervention with ganciclovir [n = 16(23.5%) vs n = 3(4.9%), P = 0.003)].CONCLUSION: These data suggest that CMV prophylaxis is superior to a preemptive strategy in patients undergoing liver transplantation.     

Patient cytomegalovirus seropositivity with or without reactivation is the most important prognostic factor for survival and treatment-related mortality in stem cell transplantation from unrelated donors using pretransplant in vivo T-cell depletion with anti-thymocyte globulin

We evaluated the cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus as a risk factor for survival and treatment-related mortality (TRM) in 125 patients allografted from an unrelated donor between 1994 and 1999. All patients received pretransplant in vivo T-cell depletion using rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG). Only one patient had primary graft failure and severe grade III/IV graft-versus-host disease occurred in 14% of the patients. The overall survival (OS) at 3 years was 70% for CMV-negative patients (n = 76) and 29% in the seropositive cohort (n = 49) (P > 0.001). In multivariate analyses, CMV seropositivity remained an independent negative prognostic factor for OS (RR: 2.1; CI: 1.2-3.8; P = 0.014), apart from age > 20 years (RR: 2.74; CI: 1.2-3.8; P = 0.004) and late leucocyte engraftment (RR: 2.4; CI: 1.2-4.9; P = 0.015). The TRM for all patients was 27%. Despite monitoring for CMV antigenaemia and preemptive therapy with ganciclovir when reactivation occurred, seropositive patients had a three times higher risk of fatal treatment-related complications than seronegative patients. In multivariate analyses, CMV seropositivity remained the strongest independent negative factor for TRM (RR: 5.3; CI: 1.9-14.6; P = 0.002), followed by age > 20 years (RR: 4.8; CI: 1.3-18.1; P = 0.02) and delayed leucocyte engraftment (RR: 3.6; CI: 1.2-11; P = 0.02). The TRM was identical in seropositive patients with (n = 27) or without (n = 22) CMV reactivation (44% versus 50%). We conclude that CMV seropositivity, despite preemptive ganciclovir therapy and even without reactivation, is a major negative prognostic factor for survival as well as for TRM in unrelated stem cell transplantation using pretransplant in vivo T-cell depletion with ATG.     

Dynamics of cytomegalovirus replication during preemptive therapy with oral ganciclovir

The degree and dynamics of cytomegalovirus (CMV) replication were investigated in blood samples that were prospectively collected in the context of a placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy of preemptive oral ganciclovir for the prevention of CMV disease after liver transplantation. The degree of viral replication was strongly associated with progression to CMV disease or viremia (risk ratio, 8.8 and 51.5 among patients with virus loads < or =2860 and >2860 copies/10(6) peripheral blood leukocytes, respectively). Preemptive oral ganciclovir therapy diminished the incidence of CMV disease or viremia but did not completely suppress higher levels of CMV replication. Six (21%) of 29 patients had persistent CMV replication during preemptive oral ganciclovir therapy; 2 patients subsequently developed "breakthrough" CMV syndrome. This study identifies a relative cutoff virus load that predicts subsequent development of CMV disease and highlights the inability of oral ganciclovir to suppress CMV replication in a subset of patients.     

Cytomegalovirus pneumonia in adult autologous blood and marrow transplant recipients

CMV pneumonia is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among allogeneic BMT recipients. To assess the frequency, timing, risk factors and response to therapy of CMV pneumonia among autologous BMT recipients, we reviewed our experience with 795 patients. Sixteen (2%) patients were diagnosed with CMV pneumonia. The frequency was higher among patients who were seropositive than those who were seronegative (3.3% vs 0%, P = 0.008). Among seropositive patients, the frequency was higher among patients with hematological malignancies than patients with solid tumors (5.0 % vs 1.0%, P = 0.019). Eleven cases occurred <30 days, and five cases occurred >100 days post transplant. The overall CMV pneumonia-related mortality rate was 31%. Seven (78%) of nine patients treated with ganciclovir and IVIG prior to respiratory failure survived; neither of two patients treated after respiratory failure survived. Four of five (80%) untreated patients survived. In conclusion, CMV is a not infrequent cause of pneumonia among autologous BMT recipients. Risk factors include CMV seropositivity and an underlying hematological malignancy. A favorable response hinges on the prompt initiation of therapy. The survival of 25% of the patients without antiviral therapy suggests that the isolation of CMV from a BAL specimen occasionally reflects oropharyngeal contamination or that CMV pneumonia may sometimes be self-limited in more immunocompetent autologous BMT recipients.