Performance evaluation of three automated human immunodeficiency virus antigen-antibody combination immunoassays

Three fourth-generation antigen/antibody combination assays (Elecsys, AxSYM, Architect HIV) and two third-generation (AxSYM, Centaur) HIV antibody immunoassays were evaluated. The evaluation panel of 479 samples included: nine tissue culture derived HIV-1 strains at four different p24 antigen concentrations (n=36), a p24 antigen sensitivity panel (n=10), 149 HIV-1 or HIV-2 confirmed antibody positive samples, ten anti-HIV-1 positive low titer samples, three seroconversion panels (n=21), and 253 HIV negative samples. The Architect had the best sensitivity for detection of HIV-1 antigen across eight HIV-1 subtypes, followed by the AxSYM while the Elecsys could not detect the highest antigen concentration evaluated (25 pg/mL) for eight of nine virus isolates. All assays showed 100% sensitivity for detection of HIV-1, group M, group O, and HIV-2 antibody positive samples. The Architect Ag/Ab Combo assay detected the first positive bleed of the three seroconversion panels and detected infection 4-26 days earlier than the third generation assays. Based on evaluation of 253 negative samples, assay specificity varied from 98.0% to 99.6%. The Architect HIV Ag/Ab Combo exhibited the best performance for specificity and detection of p24 antigen leading to closure of seroconversion window and demonstrating its utility for early diagnosis of HIV infection.     

Reduction of Diagnostic Window by New Fourth-Generation Human Immunodeficiency Virus Screening Assays

In order to reduce the diagnostic window between the time of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and laboratory diagnosis, new screening enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) which permit the simultaneous detection of HIV antigen and antibody have been developed. Two fourth-generation assays, HIV DUO (Biomérieux) and HIV Combi (Boehringer Mannheim), for the combined detection of HIV antigen and antibody, were compared with a third-generation assay (HIV-1/HIV-2 3rd Generation Plus enzyme immunoassay [EIA]; Abbott) and a p24 antigen test (HIV-1 Ag monoclonal; Abbott). A total of 17 seroconversion panels, 15 cell culture supernatants infected with different HIV type 1 (HIV-1) subtypes, and 255 potentially cross-reactive serum samples were tested. Ten seroconversions were detected an average of 8.1 days earlier with HIV DUO and 7.5 days earlier with HIV Combi than with the third-generation ELISA. Overall, in the 17 seroconversion panels tested, HIV DUO detected HIV-1 infection an average of 4.8 days and HIV Combi detected infection an average of 4.4 days earlier than HIV-1/HIV-2 3rd Generation Plus EIA. HIV antigen was detected with HIV DUO and HIV Combi in all of the 15 cell culture supernatants infected with different HIV-1 subtypes, including subtype O. With fourth-generation assays, considerably fewer false-positive results (n = 4 to 6) were obtained, in comparison with the third-generation EIA (n = 18). Fourth-generation assays permit an earlier diagnosis of HIV infection than third-generation antibody screening assays through the detection of p24 antigen, which may be present in serum samples from individuals with recent HIV infection prior to seroconversion.     

Could the new HIV combined p24 antigen and antibody assays replace p24 antigen specific assays?

The performance of twelve HIV combined p24 antigen and antibody assays available in Europe were compared. The assays were examined with a total of 1983 samples that included 1005 unselected HIV negative samples, 7 HIV-1 p24 Ag reference samples with HIV-1 Ag, 10 samples of a HIV antigen sensitivity commercial panel, 124 samples of 31 p24 antigen panels of different HIV-1 subtypes, 168 members of 24 HIV-1 seroconversion panels, 559 HIV-1 (groups M and O) antibody positive samples and 110 HIV-2 antibody positive samples. The specificity ranged from 99.4 to 100%. Ten of the 12 assays detected all anti-HIV positive samples irrespective of genotype while two assays missed one sample each (one subtype F and one subtype C). The combined assays could be classified into three groups. The first includes two assays (Enzygnost HIV Integral and Vironostika Ag/Ab) that have a clinical sensitivity similar to the two antibody only assays. The second includes the seven assays that detected infection after the p24 antigen only assay and show a delay from 3.3 to 5.17 days after HIV-1 RNA. The third group detected the infection before the p24 antigen assay and less than 3 days after nucleic acid testing (NAT). The improved ability to detect p24 Ag, at levels similar to specific HIV Ag assays, suggests that these new HIV combined Ag/Ab assays could replace p24 antigen only assays in situations for blood or organ screening when NAT is not feasible or not affordable.     

Performances of four fourth‐generation human immunodeficiency virus‐1 screening assays

Fourth‐generation human immunodeficiency virus‐1 (HIV‐1) screening assays have improved sensitivity, but vary in performance characteristics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate four different fourth‐generation HIV‐1 assays. These assays included the AxSYM HIV Ag/Ab Combo (Abbott diagnostics, Delkenheim, Germany), ARCHITECT HIV Ag/Ab Combo (Abbott), Elecsys 2010 HIV Combi (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany), and Elecsys HIV Combi PT (Roche). A total of 1,306 samples that included 1,225 clinical samples and 81 samples consisting of seroconversion panels, an HIV‐1 p24 antigen sensitivity panel, and dilution series of HIV‐1 lysates and HIV‐1 antibodies were tested. All of the assays had sensitivities of 100% on clinical samples. The specificities of the AxSYM, ARCHITECT, Elecsys 2010 HIV Combi, and Elecsys HIV Combi PT were 99.6, 99.6, 99.0, and 99.5%, respectively. Of the 81 samples with different levels of HIV antigen or antibody and/or subtypes, Elecsys HIV Combi PT and ARCHITECT HIV Ag/Ab Combo showed better analytical sensitivities than the other two assays. In summary, the performance characteristics of AxSYM, ARCHITECT, and Elecsys HIV Combi PT were comparable and satisfactory for clinical samples. ARCHITECT HIV Ag/Ab Combo and Elecsys HIV Combi PT have the higher analytical sensitivities, and would be preferable for reducing the window period. J. Med. Virol. 84:1884–1888, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Improved Detection of Hepatitis B Virus Surface Antigen by a New Rapid Automated Assay

The performance of hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen (HBsAg) screening assays is continuously improved in order to reduce the residual risk of transfusion-associated hepatitis B. In a multicenter study, a new automated rapid screening assay, Elecsys HBsAg (Roche Diagnostics), was compared to well-established tests (Auszyme Monoclonal [overnight incubation] version B and IMx HBsAg [Abbott]). Included in the evaluation were 23 seroconversion panels; sera from the acute and chronic phases of infection; dilution series of various HBsAg standards, HBV subtypes, and S gene mutants; and isolated anti-HBV core antigen-positive samples. To challenge the specificity of the new assay, sera from HBsAg-negative blood donors, pregnant women, and dialysis and hospitalized patients and potentially cross-reactive samples were investigated. Elecsys HBsAg showed a higher sensitivity for HBsAg subtypes ad, ay, adw2, adw4, ayw1, ayw2, ayw4, and adr detection in dilution series of different standards or sera than Auszyme Monoclonal version B and/or IMx HBsAg. Acute hepatitis B was detected in 11 to 16 of 23 seroconversion panels between 2 and 16 days earlier with Elecsys HBsAg than with the alternative assays. Elecsys HBsAg and Auszyme Monoclonal version B detected HBsAg surface mutants with equal sensitivity. The sensitivity and specificity of Elecsys HBsAg were 100%. Auszyme Monoclonal version B had a 99.9% specificity, and its sensitivity was 96.6%. IMx HBsAg showed a poorer sensitivity and specificity than the other assays. In conclusion, Elecsys HBsAg permits earlier detection of acute hepatitis B and different HBV subtypes than the alternative assays. By using highly sensitive HBsAg screening assays, low-level HBsAg carriers among isolated anti-HBV core antigen-positive individuals can be detected.     

Seven human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antigen-antibody combination assays: evaluation of HIV seroconversion sensitivity and subtype detection

In this study, we evaluated the performance of two prototype human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antigen-antibody (Ag-Ab) combination assays, one from Abbott Laboratories (AxSYM HIV Ag-Ab) and the other from bioMerieux (VIDAS HIV Duo Ultra), versus five combination assays commercially available in Europe. The assays were Enzygnost HIV Integral, Genscreen Plus HIV Ag-Ab, Murex HIV Ag-Ab Combination, VIDAS HIV Duo, and Vironostika HIV Uniform II Ag-Ab. All assays were evaluated for the ability to detect p24 antigen from HIV-1 groups M and O, antibody-positive plasma samples from HIV-1 groups M and O, HIV-2, and 19 HIV seroconversion panels. Results indicate that although all combination assays can detect antibodies to HIV-1, group M, subtypes A to G, circulating recombinant form (CRF) A/E, and HIV-1 group O, their sensitivity varied considerably when tested using diluted HIV-1 group O and HIV-2 antibody-positive samples. Among combination assays, the AxSYM, Murex, and VIDAS HIV Duo Ultra assays exhibited the best antigen sensitivity (at approximately 25 pg of HIV Ag/ml) for detection of HIV-1 group M, subtypes A to G and CRF A/E, and HIV-1 group O isolates. However, the VIDAS HIV Duo Ultra assay had a lower sensitivity for HIV-1 group M and subtype C, and was unable to detect subtype C antigen even at 125 pg of HIV Ag/ml. The HIV antigen sensitivity of the VIDAS HIV Duo and Genscreen Plus combination assays was approximately 125 pg of HIV Ag/ml for detection of all HIV-1 group M isolates except HIV-1 group O while the sensitivity of Vironostika HIV Uniform II Ag-Ab and Enzygnost HIV Integral Ag-Ab assays for all the group M subtypes was >125 pg of HIV Ag/ml. Among the combination assays, the AxSYM assay had the best performance for detection of early seroconversion samples, followed by the Murex and VIDAS HIV Duo Ultra assays.     

Multicenter evaluation of a new, automated enzyme-linked immunoassay for detection of human immunodeficiency virus-specific antibodies and antigen

A collaborative multicenter study was conducted to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and precision of a three-step, fully automated, qualitative microparticle-based enzyme-linked immunoassay (AxSYM HIV Ag/Ab Combo; Abbott Laboratories), designed to simultaneously detect (i). antibodies against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and/or type 2 (HIV-2) and (ii). HIV p24 antigen. A significant reduction in the HIV seroconversion window was achieved by combining detection of HIV antibodies and antigen into a single assay format. For 22 selected, commercial HIV seroconversion panels, the mean time of detection with the combined-format HIV antigen-antibody assay was reduced by 6.15 days compared to that with a similar third-generation single-format HIV antibody assay. The quantitative sensitivity of the combination assay for the p24 antigen (17.5 pg/ml by use of the p24 quantitative panel VIH SFTS96') was nearly equivalent to that of single-format antigen tests. The combination assay demonstrated sensitive (100%) detection of anti-HIV immunoglobulin in specimens from individuals in CDC stages A, B, and C and from individuals infected with different HIV-1 group M subtypes, group O, or HIV-2. The apparent specificity for hospitalized patients (n = 1938) was 99.90%. In a random population of 7900 volunteer blood donors, the specificity (99.87%) was comparable to that of a third-generation single-format HIV antibody assay (99.92%) on the same donor specimens. In addition, the combination assay was robust to potential interfering specimens. The precision of the combination was high, with intra- and interrun variances of 相似文献   

Evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of six HIV combined p24 antigen and antibody assays

In this study, we evaluated the performance of six HIV combined p24 antigen and antibody (Ag/Ab) assays versus two third-generation anti-HIV antibody assays. The assays were evaluated using p24 antigen panel of 31 HIV-1 subtypes (n = 124), 25 HIV-1 seroconversion panels (n = 176), HIV-1 antibody positive samples including group M subtypes and group O (n = 559), HIV-2 positive samples (n = 110), and unselected HIV negative samples from four French private laboratories (n = 1005). The results showed that overall HIV combined Ag/Ab assays present better performance, when compared to antibody-only assays. However, some differences were observed in the sensitivity of the six HIV combined Ag/Ab assays evaluated. The AxSYM and Murex Combo assays had the best sensitivity score in this study and reduced the window period by 2.0-2.35 days relative to antibody only assays and 1-2.17 days relative to the other combined Ag/Ab assays. Among combined HIV Ag/Ab assays, Genscreen Plus and AxSYM Combo presented the highest specificity, with 99.9% and 99.8%, respectively.     

Quantitative detection of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antigen by the Enzymun-Test: comparison with alternative assays and nucleic acid sequence-based amplification of HIV type 1 RNA.

A new modular automated enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (Enzymun-Test HIV Ag: Boehringer Mannheim) for quantitative human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antigen detection was evaluated by testing a panel of 1,506 serum samples, including seroconversions, dilution series, follow-up samples from patients under antiretroviral therapy, single serum specimens from HIV-seropositive individuals in different stages of infection, potentially cross-reactive samples, and sera from HIV-negative hospitalized patients. The Abbott HIV type 1 (HIV-1) antigen monoclonal antibody assay served as the reference assay, and nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (Organon Teknika) for quantitative amplification of HIV-1 RNA was used for follow-up of patients under antiretroviral chemotherapy. The Boehringer Mannheim and Abbott EIAs showed concordant results for the early detection of HIV antigen in all the seroconversion panels. The follow-up samples from 29 HIV-infected individuals under antiretroviral therapy gave divergent results between both antigen tests. For the detection of HIV antigen in single serum samples from HIV-infected patients in different stages of HIV infection, a higher number of positive samples was detected with the Abbott HIV-1 antigen monoclonal antibody assay in samples from patients in stages II and III of HIV infection. The Enzymun-Test detected three or more positive samples than did the Abbott assay among the samples of patients with AIDS. The concordance on a sample-to-sample basis between the Boehringer Mannheim and Abbott EIAs was 98.6%. The sensitivity of the Enzymun-Test in comparison to the reference assay was 97.2%; the specificity was 98.8%. Although no close correlation could be found between the amount of viral RNA in serum detected by nucleic acid sequence-based amplification and the concentration of HIV antigen, a high HIV-1 RNA copy number was mostly associated with high levels of HIV antigen. In conclusion, the Enzymun-Test permits accurate HIV antigen detection and offers, in contrast to previous assays, the possibility of completely automated detection.     

Performance comparison of the 4th generation Bio-Rad Laboratories GS HIV Combo Ag/Ab EIA on the EVOLIS™ automated system versus Abbott ARCHITECT HIV Ag/Ab Combo,Ortho Anti-HIV 1 + 2 EIA on Vitros ECi and Siemens HIV-1/O/2 enhanced on Advia Centaur

BackgroundA multisite study was conducted to evaluate the performance of the Bio-Rad 4th generation GS HIV Combo Ag/Ab EIA versus Abbott 4th generation ARCHITECT HIV Ag/Ab Combo. The performance of two 3rd generation EIAs, Ortho Diagnostics Anti-HIV 1 + 2 EIA and Siemens HIV 1/O/2 was also evaluated.ObjectiveStudy objective was comparison of analytical HIV-1 p24 antigen detection, sensitivity in HIV-1 seroconversion panels, specificity in blood donors and two HIV false reactive panels.Study designAnalytical sensitivity was evaluated with International HIV-1 p24 antigen standards, the AFFSAPS (pg/mL) and WHO 90/636 (IU/mL) standards; sensitivity in acute infection was compared on 55 seroconversion samples, and specificity was evaluated on 1000 negative blood donors and two false reactive panels.ResultsGS HIV Combo Ag/Ab demonstrated better analytical HIV antigen sensitivity compared to ARCHITECT HIV Ag/Ab Combo: 0.41 IU/mL versus 1.2 IU/mL (WHO) and 12.7 pg/mL versus 20.1 pg/mL (AFSSAPS); GS HIV Combo Ag/Ab EIA also demonstrated slightly better specificity compared to ARCHITECT HIV Ag/Ab Combo (100% versus 99.7%). The 4th generation HIV Combo tests detected seroconversion 7–11 days earlier than the 3rd generation HIV antibody only EIAs.ConclusionBoth 4th generation immunoassays demonstrated excellent performance in sensitivity, with the reduction of the serological window period (7–11 days earlier detection than the 3rd generation HIV tests). However, GS HIV Combo Ag/Ab demonstrated improved HIV antigen analytical sensitivity and slightly better specificity when compared to ARCHITECT HIV Ag/Ab Combo assay, with higher positive predictive values (PPV) for low prevalence populations.     

Evaluation of two new automated assays for hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) detection: IMMULITE HBsAg and IMMULITE 2000 HBsAg

In recent years the diagnostic industry has developed new automated immunoassays for the qualitative detection of hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen (HBsAg) in serum and plasma samples that are performed on analyzers that permit a high-speed throughput, random access, and primary tube sampling. The aim of the present study was the evaluation of two new automated HBsAg screening assays, IMMULITE HBsAg and IMMULITE 2000 HBsAg, from Diagnostic Products Corporation. The new HBsAg assays were compared to well-established tests (Auszyme Monoclonal [overnight incubation, version B], IMx HBsAg, AxSYM HBsAg, and Prism HBsAg [all from Abbott] and Elecsys HBsAg [Roche Diagnostics]). In the evaluation were included seroconversion panels, sera from the acute and chronic phases of infection, dilution series of various HBsAg standards, HBV subtypes and S gene mutants. To challenge the specificity of the new assays, sera from HBsAg-negative blood donors, pregnant women, and dialysis and hospitalized patients and potentially cross-reactive samples were investigated. IMMULITE HBsAg and IMMULITE 2000 HBsAg, although not as sensitive as the Elecsys HBsAg assay, were equivalent to the AxSYM HBsAg assay and showed a higher sensitivity than the Auszyme Monoclonal B and IMx HBsAg systems for detection of acute infection in seroconversion panels. The specificities (100%) of both IMMULITE assays on unselected blood donors and potentially interfering samples were comparable to those of the alternative assays after repeated testing. In conclusion, the new IMMULITE HBsAg and IMMULITE 2000 HBsAg assays show a good sensitivity for HBsAg detection compared to other well-established tests. The specificity on repeatedly tested samples was equivalent to that of the alternative assays. The rapid turnaround time, primary tube sampling, and on-board dilution make it an interesting assay system for clinical laboratory diagnosis.     

Shortening of the diagnostic window with a new combined HIV p24 antigen and anti-HIV-1/2/O screening test

Because antibodies to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are absent in the very early phase of HIV infection, there remains a slight residual risk for HIV transmission by blood donations by viremic but antibody negative donations. To shorten the diagnostic window between infection and the detection of antibodies, Enzygnost® HIV Integral (Dade Behring, Germany) was developed. With this new test, HIV p24 antigen and HIV antibodies can be detected simultaneously in a single test. In a multicenter study the new screening assay has been compared with various tests that detect only HIV antibodies or HIV p24 antigen and with assays which permit a simultaneous detection of HIV antigen and HIV antibodies. The new assay showed 100% sensitivity for the detection of antibodies to HIV-1, groups M (n=1102) and O (n=55), and HIV-2 (n=289). In 23 out of 52 seroconversion panels, seroconversion was detected 2–18 days earlier with the new combined antigen/antibody test compared to single antibody tests. All samples from a viral load panel (n=451), all samples containing p24 antigen (n=302), and all but one of the cell culture supernatants (n=38) infected with various HIV-1 subtypes or HIV-2 were identified reliably by the new test. The specificity of the assay for 4002 unselected blood donors was 99.78% initially and 99.80% after retesting. Potentially interfering factors had no systematic influence on specificity. By testing for p24 antigen, which is present prior to the onset of antibody production in some cases of recent HIV infection, the new assay reduces the diagnostic window as compared to third generation screening assays, thus permitting an earlier diagnosis of HIV infection.     

Fourth-Generation Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for the Simultaneous Detection of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Antigen and Antibody

The VIDAS HIV DUO Ultra, a fourth-generation immunoassay under development for the simultaneous detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) p24 antigen and antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2, was evaluated. The enzyme-linked fluorescence immunoassay, performed on the automated VIDAS instrument, is claimed to detect early and established HIV infection. The assay was challenged with a total of 2,847 samples that included 74 members of 10 seroconversion panels, 9 p24 antigen-only-reactive members of a panel of group M clades, 503 consecutively collected samples from individuals seeking care in the University of Maryland Medical System, 1,010 samples from U.S. blood donors, 1,141 samples from patients in a high-incidence population in Trinidad, 83 samples from a clinic for sexually transmitted diseases in the Bahamas, 10 confirmed HIV-1 group O samples, and 16 confirmed HIV-2 samples from the Cote d'Ivoire. Reference tests were U.S. Food and Drug Administration-licensed HIV antibody screening, p24 antigen tests, HIV confirmatory assays, and the Roche Diagnostics Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor. The VIDAS HIV DUO Ultra demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 99.5% specificity overall, with a 99.7% specificity in low-risk individuals. The analytical sensitivity, as assessed by seroconversion panels and p24 antigen in samples, was equivalent to the sensitivity of the reference assays used to characterize these panels. The VIDAS HIV DUO Ultra is accurate, offers potential advantages over conventional HIV testing for time and cost savings, has walk-away capability, and correctly identifies both early and established HIV infections.     

Evaluation of 14 commercial HIV-1/HIV-2 antibody assays using serum panels of different geographical origin and clinical stage including a unique seroconversion panel

The performance of 14 commercially available HIV-1/2 antibody assays were compared using well-characterized serum panels containing in total 1500–1800 sera. The panels included consecutive HIV-negative blood donor sera from Sweden, unselected blood donor and patient sera from Tanzania and unselected sera from outpatient clinics in Guinea-Bissau. Furthermore selected HIV-1 antibody positive sera from Sweden and Tanzania and HIV-2 antibody positive sera from Guinea-Bissau were included in the panels. The HIV-1 antibody positive sera were from individuals at various stages of HIV infection, from primary infection, to asymptomatic phase and late stage disease. 12 of the 14 assays identified correctly all HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibody positive sera. One Tanzanian HIV-1 antibody positive sample with complete banding pattern on Western blot was not detected by two of the ELISAs employing synthetic peptides. There were small differences in sensitivity between the assays when used for analysis of seroconversion panels. The most sensitive assay, Abbott IMx HIV-1/HIV-2 III Plus detected antibodies in all nine samples collected from four individuals during the first week after onset of symptoms of primary HIV-1 infection. Most of the assays became reactive during the second week after onset of symptoms and the least sensitive assays were reactive from the third week. The assays showed a high specificity ranging from 99.2 to 100% when used for analysis of Swedish blood donor sera, while most of the assays showed a significantly lower specificity, 91.9–99.6%, when used for testing African specimens.     

Comparative evaluation of the VIDAS HIV DUO Ultra assay for combined detection of HIV-1 antigen and antibodies to HIV

The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of the combined antigen and antibody HIV screening assay VIDAS HIV DUO Ultra (BioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) in comparison with two other combined tests: the former version of the same test (VIDAS HIV DUO, BioMérieux) and the AxSYM HIV Ag/Ab Combo assay (Abbott Laboratories, Rungis, France). A prospective study was performed on serum specimens received on a routine basis for HIV testing: 1443 blood samples were tested with the three assays. Sensitivity was 100% for the three tests. Specificity assessed on repeated false-positive samples was 99.86, 99.03 and 99.65% for VIDAS HIV DUO Ultra, VIDAS HIV DUO and AxSYM HIV Ag/Ab Combo, respectively. In addition, 14 seroconversion panels were tested with the VIDAS DUO Ultra and AxSYM HIV Ag/Ab Combo assays. For four of these panels, a positive signal was detected one blood sampling point earlier with the VIDAS DUO Ultra assay, corresponding to a higher sensitivity of the HIV antigen test. These results indicate that the VIDAS HIV DUO Ultra exhibits an improved specificity with comparison to the former version of this assay and an excellent sensitivity for early detection of HIV seroconversion.     

Performance evaluation of Elecsys HIV Duo on cobas e 801 using clinical samples in China

The prevalence and incidence of human immunodeficiency viruses (HIV) infection are rapidly increasing, and novel HIV genotypes are emerging. This study evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of Elecsys HIV Duo assay in population with the epidemic of multiple genotypes of HIV-1 infection. Specificity of the Elecsys HIV Duo assay was determined using 3039 serum samples from patients receiving routine HIV-1 screening tests in China. Sensitivity was assessed with seroconversion panels. Additional 67 positive from newly diagnosed HIV-1 infected samples were also included to test assay performance on various HIV-1 genotypes. The assay performance was compared with that of the Elecsys HIV Combi PT assay. The genotypes of all HIV-1 positive samples were determined with phylogenetic analyses on the 1.1 kb Pro-RT region of pol gene for drug resistance tests. The Elecsys HIV Duo assay had a slightly higher specificity (99.93% vs 99.84%) and equivalent sensitivity to Elecsys HIV Combi PT assay. Seventy-two HIV-1 positive samples, including 12 antigens positive samples, were distinguished by Elecsys HIV Duo. Among them, 43 samples were circulating recombinant form (CRF)01_AE, followed by 13 of CRF07_BC, 10 of subtype B, 4 of URF_0107, 1 of URF_01B and 1 of CRF02_AG. The Elecsys HIV Duo assay showed good performance for the Chinese population with an epidemic of multiple HIV genotypes.     

Evaluation of the performance of a new automated HIV combination assay

BackgroundMore and more countries test for HIV infection using combination assays that simultaneously detect p24 antigen and HIV antibodies.ObjectiveTo assess the performance of a new HIV combo assay: LIAISON^® XL murex HIV Ab/Ag HT.Study designThe assays were examined with a total of 3090 samples that included 769 selected HIV antibody-negative samples, 1849 unselected HIV samples, 15 HIV-1 p24 Ag reference samples, 90 primary HIV-1 infection (PHI) samples, 167 HIV-1 antibody-positive samples (well characterized of groups M and O), 95 HIV-1 antibody-positive samples and 105 HIV-2 antibody-positive samples.ResultsThe specificity of the LIAISON^® XL murex HIV Ab/Ag HT was 99.7%. The analytical sensitivity of Ag p24 of the LIAISON^® XL murex HIV Ab/Ag HT was 0.58 IU/mL and 9.93 pg/mL when using WHO and French national standards, respectively. All screened HIV subtypes was identified by this assay. Also, 90 PHI specimens were detected by this screening assay.ConclusionThe sensitivity and specificity of the LIAISON^® XL murex HIV Ab/Ag HT assay are high. Hence the assay offers automated high-throughput screening with ability to detect primary infection.     

Comparative evaluation of three FDA-approved HIV Ag/Ab combination tests using a genetically diverse HIV panel and diagnostic specimens

BackgroundHIV Ag/Ab combination assays are recommended by CDC for routine screening and several HIV Ag/Ab combination tests are now FDA-approved. Maintaining high specificity and consistent sensitivity across diverse HIV strains is critical for these assays to accurately detect HIV infection and expedite delivery of patient results.ObjectivesTo evaluate performance of three FDA-approved HIV tests: ARCHITECT HIV Combo (Abbott), ADVIA Centaur HIV Combo (Siemens) and BioPlex HIV Ag-Ab (Bio-Rad).Study designSensitivity and specificity were evaluated using an extensive panel of 28 HIV infected human specimens and 17 cultured virus isolates representing multiple genotypes, 6 seroconversion panels, 4 human samples with acute infection, WHO p24 standard and 4020 clinical specimens.ResultsThe p24 limit of detection (LOD) for the WHO standard was 0.19 IU/ml, 0.70 IU/ml, and 1.77 IU/ml in BioPlex, ARCHITECT, and Centaur respectively. The distribution of LODs across 15 HIV-1 isolates was substantially narrower in ARCHITECT (5–33 pg/ml) than in BioPlex (11–198 pg/ml) and Centaur (6–384 pg/ml). All assays detected antibodies to the majority of HIV-1 and HIV-2 variants. However, reduced sensitivity was observed for Centaur in detection of antibodies to HIV-1 group M (CRF02_AG), O and N variants. BioPlex and ARCHITECT showed better seroconversion sensitivity than Centaur, detecting one bleed (3–7 days) earlier in 4 (BioPlex) and 3 (ARCHITECT) of 6 seroconversion panels. ARCHITECT demonstrated the highest specificity (99.90–100%) compared to BioPlex (99.80%) and Centaur (99.42%).ConclusionsThe overall performance of ARCHITECT and BioPlex was superior to Centaur, especially for detection of acute HIV infection.