Delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) in early knee osteoarthritis.

Delayed contrast-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) is a noninvasive technique to study cartilage glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content in vivo. This study evaluates dGEMRIC in patients with preradiographic degenerative cartilage changes. Seventeen knees in 15 patients (age 35-70) with arthroscopically verified cartilage changes (softening and fibrillations) in the medial or lateral femoral compartment, knee pain, and normal weight-bearing radiography were included. MRI (1.5 T) was performed precontrast and at 1.5 and 3 hr after an intravenous injection of Gd-DTPA(2-) at 0.3 mmol/kg body weight. T(1) measurements were made in regions of interest in medial and lateral femoral cartilage using sets of five turbo inversion recovery images. Precontrast, R(1) (R(1) = 1/T(1), 1/s) was slightly lower in diseased compared to reference compartment, indicating increased hydration (P = 0.01). Postcontrast, R(1) was higher in diseased than in reference compartment at 1.5 hr, 3.45 +/- 0.90 and 2.64 +/- 0.58 (mean +/- SD), respectively (P < 0.01), as well as at 3 hr, 2.94 +/- 0.60 and 2.50 +/- 0.37, respectively (P = 0.01). The washout of the contrast medium was faster in diseased cartilage as shown by a higher R(1) at 1.5 than at 3 hr in the diseased but not in the reference compartment. In conclusion, dGEMRIC can identify GAG loss in early stage cartilage disease with a higher sensitivity at 1.5 than 3 hr.     

Delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) and T2 characteristics of human knee articular cartilage: topographical variation and relationships to mechanical properties.

The macromolecular structure and mechanical properties of articular cartilage are interrelated and known to vary topographically in the human knee joint. To investigate the potential of delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC), T1, and T2 mapping to elucidate these differences, full-thickness cartilage disks were prepared from six anatomical locations in nonarthritic human knee joints (N = 13). Young's modulus and the dynamic modulus at 1 Hz were determined with the use of unconfined compression tests, followed by quantitative MRI measurements at 9.4 Tesla. Mechanical tests revealed reproducible, statistically significant differences in moduli between the patella and the medial/lateral femoral condyles. Typically, femoral cartilage showed higher Young's (>1.0 MPa) and dynamic (>8 MPa) moduli than tibial or patellar cartilage (Young's modulus < 0.9 MPa, dynamic modulus < 8 MPa). dGEMRIC moderately reproduced the topographical variation in moduli. Additionally, T1, T2, and dGEMRIC revealed topographical differences that were not registered mechanically. The different MRI and mechanical parameters showed poor to excellent linear correlations, up to r = 0.87, at individual test sites. After all specimens were pooled, dGEMRIC was the best predictor of compressive stiffness (r = 0.57, N = 77). The results suggest that quantitative MRI can indirectly provide information on the mechanical properties of human knee articular cartilage, as well as the site-dependent variations of these properties. Investigators should consider the topographical variation in MRI parameters when conducting quantitative MRI of cartilage in vivo.     

Three-dimensional delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) at 1.5T and 3.0T

PURPOSE: To implement and validate a three-dimensional (3D) T1 measurement technique that is suitable for delayed gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) and can be easily implemented with clinically available pulse sequences at 1.5T and 3.0T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 3D inversion-recovery prepared spoiled gradient-echo (IR-SPGR) imaging pulse sequence with variable TR was used to implement a 3D T1 measurement protocol. The 3D T1 measurements were validated against a gold-standard single-slice 2D IR T1 measurement protocol in both phantoms and in vivo, in both asymptomatic volunteers and volunteers with osteoarthritis (OA). RESULTS: T1 measurements in phantoms showed a statistically significant correlation between the 2D and 3D measurements at 1.5T (R2=0.993, P<0.001) and 3.0T (R2=0.996, P<0.001). In vivo application demonstrated the feasibility of using this 3D IR-SPGR sequence to evaluate the molecular status of articular cartilage throughout the knee joint with 0.63x0.63x3.0 mm spatial resolution within a 20-minute acquisition, even with the measurement parameters set for the higher T1(Gd) of cartilage at 3T (range=400-900 msec mean T1 within a region of interest (ROI) in cartilage, compared to 200-600 msec mean T1 at 1.5T). CONCLUSION: This 3D T1 measurement protocol may prove useful for the evaluation and follow-up of cartilage dGEMRIC indices in clinical studies of OA.     

Image registration improves human knee cartilage T1 mapping with delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC)

Objectives

To evaluate the effect of automated registration in delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) of the knee on the occurrence of movement artefacts on the T1 map and the reproducibility of region-of-interest (ROI)-based measurements.

Methods

Eleven patients with early-stage knee osteoarthritis and ten healthy controls underwent dGEMRIC twice at 3?T. Controls underwent unenhanced imaging. ROIs were manually drawn on the femoral and tibial cartilage. T1 calculation was performed with and without registration of the T1-weighted images. Automated three-dimensional rigid registration was performed on the femur and tibia cartilage separately. Registration quality was evaluated using the square root Cramér–Rao lower bound (CRLB_σ). Additionally, the reproducibility of dGEMRIC was assessed by comparing automated registration with manual slice-matching.

Results

Automated registration of the T1-weighted images improved the T1 maps as the 90% percentile of the CRLB_σ was significantly (P?<?0.05) reduced with a median reduction of 55.8 ms (patients) and 112.9 ms (controls). Manual matching and automated registration of the re-imaged T1 map gave comparable intraclass correlation coefficients of respectively 0.89/0.90 (patients) and 0.85/0.85 (controls).

Conclusions

Registration in dGEMRIC reduces movement artefacts on T1 maps and provides a good alternative to manual slice-matching in longitudinal studies.

Key Points

? Quantitative MRI is increasingly used for biomedical assessment of knee articular cartilage ? Image registration leads to more accurate quantification of cartilage quality and damage ? Movement artefacts in delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) are reduced ? Automated image registration successfully aligns baseline and follow-up dGEMRIC examinations ? Reproducibility of dGEMRIC with registration is similar to that using manual slice-matching     

Utility of delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI (dGEMRIC) for qualitative evaluation of articular cartilage of patellofemoral joint

Delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) was used for the measurement of relative proteoglycan depletion of articular cartilage in the patellofemoral (PF) joint following a proprietary protocol, which was compared with the X-ray images, proton density weighted MR images (PDWI) and arthroscopic findings. The study examined 30 knees. The ages ranged from 16 to 74 (average 40.3) years. The Gd-DTPA^2–containing contrast medium was used in a single dose. The subjects were made to exercise the knee joint for 10 min; and MR images were taken 2 h after intravenous injection of contrast medium. T1-calculated images were produced and the region of interest (ROI) was set as follows. (1) ROI1: entire articular cartilage in a slice through the center of the patella. (2) ROI2: low signal region in T1-calculated images, which were set in a blind fashion by two observers. (3) ROI3: articular cartilage on one side that includes ROI2 where low signal region were detected (medial or lateral). ROI3 was set to examine the contrast of ROI2 with surrounding articular cartilage. The average T1 values of ROI1 was 393.5±33.6 ms for radiographic grade 0 and 361.3±11.1 ms for grade I, which showed a significant difference (P=0.036). The T1 value of ROI2 was 351.6±28.2 ms for grade I, 361.9±38.3 ms for grade II, 362.1±67.7 ms for grade III, and 297.8±54.1 ms for grade IV according to arthroscopic Outerbridge classification. All cases, that demonstrated decrease of T1 values on dGEMRIC (ROI2), showed abnormal arthroscopic or direct viewing findings. The ratio (ROI3/ROI2) in cases of only slight damage classified as Outerbridge grade I (6 cases) was an average of 1.04±0.02 and was 1.0 or greater in all cases, thereby indicating well-defined contrast with the surrounding cartilage. The diagnosis of damage in articular cartilage was possible in all 16 cases with radiographic K–L grade I on dGEMRIC, while the intensity changes were not found in 10 of 16 cases on PDWI. The dGEMRIC with a single-dose would be useful on a diagnosis of the area demonstrating early relative proteoglycan depletion in the articular cartilage of the PF joint prior to any discernible changes in the subchondral bone on X-ray images and exceeds to plain MR images for examining deterioration of articular cartilage.     

Three-dimensional delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) for in vivo evaluation of reparative cartilage after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation at 3.0T: Preliminary results

PURPOSE: To use a 3D gradient-echo (GRE) sequence with two flip angles for delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) to evaluate relative glycosaminoglycan content of repair tissue after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a phantom study, T1-mapping based on a 3D-GRE sequence with different flip angle combinations was compared with a standard inversion recovery (IR) sequence at 3.0T. Fifteen patients were examined after MACT in the knee at "3-13 months" (group I) and "19-42 months" (group II). The delta relaxation rate (deltaR1) calculated for repair tissue and normal hyaline cartilage was measured and mean values were compared in different postoperative intervals using analysis of variance. RESULTS: The flip angle combination 35/10 degrees provided the best agreement with IR sequence for short and long T1 values. The mean deltaR1 for repair tissue was 2.49 versus 1.04 at the intact control site in group I and 1.90 compared with 0.81 in group II. Differences from repair tissue to control sites showed statistically significance for both groups; no significant difference was found between groups. CONCLUSION: The 3D dual flip angle dGEMRIC technique optimized for cartilage imaging is comparable to standard T1 IR technique for T1 mapping. Furthermore, the preliminary in vivo study demonstrates the feasibility of the technique in the evaluation of MACT patients.     

Differentiating normal hyaline cartilage from post-surgical repair tissue using fast gradient echo imaging in delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI (dGEMRIC) at 3 Tesla

The purpose was to evaluate the relative glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content of repair tissue in patients after microfracturing (MFX) and matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT) of the knee joint with a dGEMRIC technique based on a newly developed short 3D-GRE sequence with two flip angle excitation pulses. Twenty patients treated with MFX or MACT (ten in each group) were enrolled. For comparability, patients from each group were matched by age (MFX: 37.1 ± 16.3 years; MACT: 37.4 ± 8.2 years) and postoperative interval (MFX: 33.0 ± 17.3 months; MACT: 32.0 ± 17.2 months). The Δ relaxation rate (ΔR1) for repair tissue and normal hyaline cartilage and the relative ΔR1 were calculated, and mean values were compared between both groups using an analysis of variance. The mean ΔR1 for MFX was 1.07 ± 0.34 versus 0.32 ± 0.20 at the intact control site, and for MACT, 1.90 ± 0.49 compared to 0.87 ± 0.44, which resulted in a relative ΔR1 of 3.39 for MFX and 2.18 for MACT. The difference between the cartilage repair groups was statistically significant. The new dGEMRIC technique based on dual flip angle excitation pulses showed higher GAG content in patients after MACT compared to MFX at the same postoperative interval and allowed reducing the data acquisition time to 4 min.     

Delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC): intra- and interobserver variability in standardized drawing of regions of interest

Purpose: To establish the reproducibility of a standardized region of interest (ROI) drawing procedure in delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of cartilage (dGEMRIC).

Material and Methods: A large ROI in lateral and medial femoral weight-bearing cartilage was drawn in images of 12 healthy male volunteers by 6 investigators with different skills in MRI. The procedure was done twice, with a 1-week interval. Calculated T1-values were evaluated for intra- and interobserver variability.

Results: The mean interobserver variability for both compartments ranged between 1.3% and 2.3% for the 6 different investigators without correlation to their experience in MRI. Post-contrast intra-observer variability was low in both the lateral and the medial femoral cartilage, 2.6% and 1.5%, respectively. The larger variability in lateral than in medial cartilage was related to slightly longer and thinner ROIs.

Conclusion: Intra-observer variability and interobserver variability are both low when a large standardized ROI is used in dGEMRIC. The experience of the investigator does not affect the variability, which further supports a clinical applicability of the method.     

Influence of knee positions on T2, T*2, and dGEMRIC mapping in porcine knee cartilage

We examined the influence of flexed knee positions on cartilage MR assessments. Sagittal T₂, T*₂, and delayed gadolinium‐enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) maps of the femoral cartilage were obtained in eight 6‐month‐old porcine femorotibial joints in the extended knee position (position A: flexion 0° and femoral shaft in parallel with the amplitude of static field), flexed knee position (position B: flexion 40° and femoral shaft oriented at 40° to the amplitude of static field), and oblique‐placed knee‐extended position (position C: flexion 0° and femoral shaft oriented at 40° to the amplitude of static field). Comparison of the MR parameters between positions A and C showed isolated influence of the magic‐angle effect, and comparison between positions A and B showed effects of knee flexion. Proteoglycan and hydroxyproline content in cartilage specimen at each region of interest had no significant correlation with T₂, T*₂, and dGEMRIC values. At the central zone, located on a weight‐bearing area and parallel to the amplitude of static field, T₂/T*₂/dGEMRIC values increased by 6.8/11/0.8% at position C and by 24/44/31% at position B compared with position A. There was a significant increase in T₂ and T*₂ values at position B compared with those at position A. The substantial changes in T₂, T*₂, and dGEMRIC were shown in response to knee flexion, presumably due to the compounding influence of the magic‐angle effect and change in the intra‐articular biomechanical condition. Magn Reson Med, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Glycosaminoglycan distribution in cartilage as determined by delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC): potential clinical applications

OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe a range of in vivo observations of glycosaminoglycan distribution in knee cartilage using the delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage technique. CONCLUSION: The index of glycosaminoglycan distribution, T1(Gd), can exceed 500 msec (denoting high glycosaminoglycan) or can be less than 300 msec, with focal areas as low as 240 msec. Compartmental differences, as well as focal defects within the knee, were observed in patients who had sustained injuries to the ligaments and menisci of the knee or who had chronic osteoarthritis. Overall, these results suggest the need for further research into the biochemical changes seen during disease progression and the effects of therapeutic interventions.     

Magnetic resonance imaging ofarticular cartilage injuries of the knee

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a widely available, powerful imaging modality in the United States that has rapidly become a mainstay for evaluation of the musculoskeletal system, largely because of its unparalleled depiction of most osseous and soft-tissue pathology. The application of MRI to detect cartilage injuries has evolved to the point where it is possible to noninvasively diagnose cartilage lesions that previously required an invasive examination, eg, arthrography or arthroscopy. However, successful cartilage imaging requires knowledge of the unique technical considerations and limitations of MRI. In this chapter we review current state-of-the-art knee MRI for three groups of chondral disorders: acute osteochondral fractures, osteochondritis dissecans, and degenerative lesions. The role of MRI in osteochondral fractures includes the demonstration of purely chondral intra-articular fragments and the identification of associated injuries, especially previously unrecognized subchondral bruises. MRI may also play a role in surveillance for osteochondral sequelae after injury. For osteochondritis dissecans, MRI can provide evidence supporting the diagnosis of a loose fragment and may aid in the evaluation of cartilage overlying osteochondral defects. Current MRI techniques can show moderate and severe lesions of chondromalacia and chondrosis. Newer techniques show potential for diagnosing these degenerative conditions at earlier stages when the changes are mild. We review these issues and provide examples showing the MRI appearance of common articular injuries.     

A Phase I clinical trial of the knee to assess the correlation of gagCEST MRI,delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage and T2 mapping

PurposeOsteoarthritis (OA) is associated with the loss of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) during disease progression, which can be detected by glycosaminoglycan chemical exchange-dependent saturation transfer (gagCEST) MRI. Delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) is considered one of the standard methods for GAG quantification in vivo. This Phase I study assessed the correlation between gagCEST MRI and dGEMRIC in determining cartilage GAG concentration. Standard T2 mapping was used as a comparator with the two other methods.Materials and methodsEight athletic volunteers with no known knee diseases were recruited in this study. The sagittal images of both knees in each volunteer were obtained by a 3 T MRI system. GAG concentration was calculated based on fixed charge density (FCD) within articular cartilage as calculated by T1 values obtained from dGEMRIC sequences. Magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry (MTR_asym) of the CEST spectrum at 1 ppm was determined with gagCEST MRI. T2 values were calculated using a multi-echo turbo spin echo (TSE) sequence. The Pearson correlations among MTR_asym were calculated from gagCEST analysis.ResultsThere was moderate correlation (correlation coefficient r = 0.55) between dGEMRIC and gagCEST MRI results. T2 had a low correlation (r = −0.30) with gagCEST and no correlation with dGEMRIC (r = 0.003). Both gagCEST and dGEMRIC were able to distinguish between high GAG concentration cartilage compartments (higher than 210 mM) and low GAG cartilage compartments (lower than 210 mM).ConclusiondGEMRIC was shown to be a more accurate and sensitive clinical imaging tool in evaluating cartilage GAG levels in vivo. While GagCEST showed less sensitivity to GAG concentration variations than dGEMRIC, further improvements may yet enable gagCEST to be a clinically robust methodology.     

Steady-state diffusion-weighted imaging of in vivo knee cartilage.

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has strong potential as a diagnostic for early cartilage damage, with clinical impact for diseases such as osteoarthritis. However, in vivo DWI of cartilage has proven difficult with conventional methods due to the short T2. This work presents a 3D steady-state DWI sequence that is able to image short-T2 species with high SNR. When combined with 2D navigator correction of motion-induced phase artifacts, this method enables high resolution in vivo DWI of cartilage. In vivo knee images in healthy subjects are presented with high SNR (SNR = 110) and submillimeter in-plane resolution (0.5 x 0.7 x 3.0 mm(3)). A method for fitting the diffusion coefficient is presented which produces fits within 10% of literature values. This method should be applicable to other short-T2 tissues, such as muscle, which are difficult to image using traditional DWI methods.     

磁共振延迟增强软骨成像技术对正常及退变软骨的定量研究

目的：探讨磁共振延迟增强软骨成像对正常及退变软骨的定量研究价值。方法：69例正常及OA（退行性骨关节炎,osteoarthritis）患者经静脉注射Gd-DTPA对比剂1．5—2h后在3．0T磁共振下扫描,包括正常组（n=29）和0A组（n=40）。其中OA组按照kellgren-Lawrence评分又分为轻度OA组（n=20）、中度OA组（n=11）及重度OA组（n=9）。采用3DLL技术及后处理软件得到T,mapping图像,测量中层面内侧、中问及外侧T1值及上、中及下层面平均T1值,并进行统计学分析。结果：正常组、轻度OA组、中度OA组及重度OA组平均T1驰豫值分别为（512．59±72．30）ms、（458．03±55．89）in8、（405．89±57．30）ms及（357．92±36．74）ms。采用单因素方差分析,正常及OA组髌软骨Tl值有明显的差异（F=17．70,P=0．00〈0．05）。结论：磁共振延迟增强软骨成像技术可以敏感反映出关节软骨生化成分的改变,对关节软骨退变诊断具有一定指导价值。     

New scans from old: digital reformatting knee MRI

Purpose: To determine the accuracy of cartilage volume and bone areas measured from a 3D knee MRI sequence reformatted in different planes.Methods: MRI of 16 adult subjects (9 females, 7 males, age range 45–68 years) were acquired in the sagittal plane using a 3D T1-weighted fat suppressed spoiled gradient echo sequence. Medial and lateral tibial cartilage volumes were determined by processing images acquired in the sagittal plane and from the same image data reformatted in the coronal plane. Tibial plateau areas were determined by processing images acquired in the sagittal plane and reformatted in the axial plane.Results: Cartilage volumes calculated from the original sagittal acquisition and data reformatted into the coronal plane were similar. The average over- or under-estimation of the lateral and medial cartilage volume from the reformatted coronal scans compared to the sagittal sequences was 4.6% and 9.8% respectively. Similar medial and lateral tibial plateau areas were obtained when the sagittal data was reformatted in the axial plane. The average over- and under-estimate of lateral and medial tibial plateau areas from the reformatted axial scans compared to the originally acquired sagittal sequences was 6.5% and 6.8% respectively.Conclusion: Knee data acquired via MRI in one plane can be reformatted into different planes, providing comparable cartilage volumes and bone areas. As different planes through the knee may provide better visualization of different joint structures, this method may be useful clinically and as a research tool, while avoiding the cost associated with the prolonged scanning times associated with acquiring multiple planes.     

Impact of motion on T1 mapping acquired with inversion recovery fast spin echo and rapid spoiled gradient recalled‐echo pulse sequences for delayed gadolinium‐enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) in volunteers

Purpose:

To evaluate the impact of motion on T1 values acquired by using either inversion‐recovery fast spin echo (IR‐FSE) or three‐dimensional (3D) spoiled gradient recalled‐echo (SPGR) sequences for delayed gadolinium‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) in volunteers.

Materials and Methods:

Single‐slice IR‐FSE and 3D SPGR sequences were applied to perform dGEMRIC in five healthy volunteers. A mutual information‐based approach was used to correct for image misregistration. Displacements were expressed as averaged Euclidean distances and angles. Averages of differences in goodness of fit (Δχ²) tests and averages of relative differences in T1 values (ΔT1) before and after motion correction were computed.

Results:

Maximum Euclidean distance was 3.5 mm and 1.2 mm for IR‐FSE and SPGR respectively. Mean ± SD of Δχ² were 10.18 ± 8.4 for IR‐FSE and ?1.37 ± 5.5 for SPGR. Mean ± SD of ΔT1 were 0.008 ± 0.0048 for IR‐FSE and ?0.002 ± 0.019 for FSPGR. Pairwise comparison of Δχ² values showed a significant difference for IR‐FSE, but not for 3D‐SPGR. Significantly greater variability in T1 values was also noted for IR‐FSE than for 3D‐SPGR.

Conclusion:

Involuntary motion has a significant influence on T1 values acquired with IR‐FSE, but not with 3D‐SPGR in healthy volunteers. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010;32:394–398. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

     

Quantification of T(2) relaxation changes in articular cartilage with in situ mechanical loading of the knee

PURPOSE: To devise a method for producing in vivo MRI images of the knee under physiologically significant loading, and to compare and evaluate the changes in cartilage characteristics before and during in situ compression of the knee. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 26 asymptomatic subjects were imaged on a 1.5 Tesla Philips Intera scanner using a commercially available knee coil. Routine anatomical images were followed by T(2) map acquisition. These scans were repeated following in situ compression of the knee using a MR compatible loading jig. RESULTS: Following loading to body weight, several regions of femoral cartilage show early alteration of T(2) relaxation time, most significantly in the medial and lateral peripheral zones. There were no significant changes in the tibial cartilage. CONCLUSIONS: The results establish the feasibility of measuring changes on MRI with in situ axial loading.     

Gd-DTPA2)-enhanced MRI of femoral knee cartilage: a dose-response study in healthy volunteers.

The negatively charged contrast agent Gd-DTPA2- distributes inversely to the cartilage fixed charged density. This enables structural cartilage examinations by contrast-enhanced MRI. In line with the development of a clinically applicable protocol for such examinations, this study describes the temporal pattern of Gd-DTPA2- distribution in femoral knee cartilage at three different doses in healthy volunteers. Nineteen volunteers (ages 21-28 years) were examined with a 1.5T MRI system. Quantitative relaxation rate measurements were made in weight-bearing central parts of femoral cartilage using sets of five turbo inversion recovery images with different inversion times. The cartilage was analyzed before and four times (1-4 h) after an intravenous injection of Gd-DTPA2- at single, double, and triple doses: 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 mmol/kg body weight, respectively. The increase in R1 postcontrast was linearly dose-related at all times. The highest R1 values were registered at 2 and 3 h postcontrast, suggesting 2 h to be optimal in the clinical situation. The triple dose indicated a subtle compartmental difference in men, with higher contrast distribution medially than laterally. Results suggest that the triple dose is needed to detect minor cartilage matrix differences.     

In vivo transport of Gd-DTPA(2-) in human knee cartilage assessed by depth-wise dGEMRIC analysis

Purpose:

To investigate the transport of Gd‐DTPA^2? in different layers of femoral knee cartilage in vivo.

Materials and Methods:

T₁ measurements (1.5 Tesla) were performed in femoral knee cartilage of 23 healthy volunteers. The weight‐bearing central cartilage was analyzed before contrast and at eight time points after an intravenous injection of Gd‐DTPA^2?: 12–60 min (4 volunteers) and 1–4 h (19 volunteers). Three regions of interest were segmented manually: deep, middle, and superficial.

Results:

Before contrast injection, a depth‐wise variation of T₁ was observed with 50% higher values in the superficial region compared with the deep region. In the deep region, the uptake of Gd‐DTPA^2? was not detected until 36 min and the concentration increased until 240 min, whereas in the superficial region, the uptake was seen already at 12 min and the concentration decreased after 180 min (P < 0.01). There was a difference between medial and lateral compartment regarding bulk, but not superficial Gd‐DTPA^2? concentration. The bulk gadolinium concentration was negatively related to the cartilage thickness (r = ?0.68; P < 0.01).

Conclusion:

The depth‐wise and thickness dependent variations in Gd‐DTPA² transport influence the interpretation of bulk dGEMRIC analysis in vivo. In thick cartilage, incomplete penetration of Gd‐DTPA² will yield a falsely too long T₁. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2011;. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.